nboa financial sustainability: both sides of the spectrum research project isacs head of school...
TRANSCRIPT
NBOA
Financial Sustainability:Both Sides of the
SPECTRUM Research Project
ISACS Head of School ConferenceChicago, IllinoisJanuary 2015
With generous support from:
NBOA
Jeffrey Shields, FASAE, CAEBrief Introduction
• More than 15 years of experience working with business officers in higher education and independent schools
• Has served as NBOA President and CEO since 2010
• NBOA serves 1,150 independent schools nationwide, 13 FTE, $4 million budget, headquartered in Washington, DC
• Previously Senior Vice President, National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO)
• Certified Association Executive (CAE)• Fellow, American Society of
Association Executives (FASAE)• Trustee, Online School for Girls• Trustee, Georgetown Day School
NBOA
Program Goals
• Discuss the financial climate for independent schools leading up to, and including, the economic downturn in 2008 and 2009
• Explore the prominent models promulgated throughout the community to address independent school financial sustainability
• Share insights on the methodology, definition and initial findings from the Spectrum Research Project along with other considerations to secure your school’s financial health
NBOA
•Tuitions up 30% (real dollars) over 10 years
•Overall staff up 32% over 10 years
•Student: teacher ratios getting smaller
•Financial aid grant dollars up 38%
•Enrollment up 20%
Before the economic “winds” changed
NBOA
“New Normal”•Charge only what people can pay•Design your program to that revenue number
“Full Steam Ahead”•Charge what it costs•CPI + 2 or more when needed
Prevalent Models
NBOA
: The New Normal
• Increase enrollment without increasing staff
• “Sunset” an old program for every new one• Right size: re-think class size, workload, # of
teacher specialists, assistants, school size
• Devote 1/3rd of each fundraising dollar raised to endowment
NBOA
•Decide whether you are a price, product, or process school (you can’t be all 3!)
•Acknowledge that the 20th century “factory” model of education will not prepare students for the 21st century
•Design a 21st century school that individualizes learning using technology
•Dedicate 2% of your budget to faculty professional development
: 21st Century Model
NBOA
2013 NBOA Business Officer Survey In response to the economic decline, what strategies did you implement?
Most popular strategies
• Increase average class size
• Increase teaching loads
• Increase employee contributions for benefits
• 26.4% were going to increase the average class size, but only 11.7% did
• 58.8% were going to decrease planned salary increases, but only 32.3% did
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Increase average number of students per classroom 9.9% 11.6% 10.7% 11.7% 5.5%
Increase teaching load 9.1% 8.1% 10.9% 12.8% 3.2%
Eliminate student programs 1.6% 2.2.% 1.4% 2.7% 1.0%
Reduce the number of faculty FTEs 7.4% 7.9% 11.5% 18.0% 4.9%
Reduce the number of staff/administrative FTEs 8.0% 11.0% 14.4% 17.8% 6.7%
Decreased planned salary increases 6.2% 9.3% 14.0% 32.3% 7.8%
Reduce salaries 0.6% 2.0% 2.3% 4.0% 0.7%
Reduce benefits 3.4% 5.5% 7.4% 12.2% 2.1%
Increase the employee contribution for benefits 8.3% 13.2% 12.7% 11.7% 4.4%
% of Respondents Who Implemented Strategy by Survey Year
NBOA
Strategic Reactions► Increase Number of Students Per Classroom
Planned Implemented
2010 Survey 26.4% 11.7%
2011 Survey 19.9% 10.7%
2012 Survey 16.2% 11.6%
2013 Survey 17.9% 9.9%
NBOA
Strategic Reactions► Increase Teaching Load
Planned Implemented
2010 Survey 26.6% 12.8%
2011 Survey 18.4% 10.9%
2012 Survey 14.2% 8.1%
2013 Survey 14.8% 9.1%
NBOA
Strategic Reactions► Increase Employee Contribution for Benefits
Planned Implemented
2010 Survey 17.5% 11.7%
2011 Survey 20.7% 12.7%
2012 Survey 13.5% 13.2%
2013 Survey 18.1% 8.3%
NBOA
Strategic Reactions► Same goes for:
- Reduce Faculty FTE
- Reduce Staff / Admin FTE
- Decrease Planned Salary Increases
- Reduce Salaries
- Reduce Benefits
Source: NBOA Business Office Survey 2009-12
NBOA
13 Years of Tuition or…?
NBOA
There is NO Silver Bullet
NBOA
The Future…?
NBOASource: NAIS and US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Tuition Increases: CPI versus Reality
2002 2013 (CPI Only) 2013 Actual
Day 14000 17700 22700
Boarding 27400 34575 46800
$2,500
$7,500
$12,500
$17,500
$22,500
$27,500
$32,500
$37,500
$42,500
$47,500 ● Average yearly CPI increase for the past 12 years is 1.96%.
● Has your school had a tuition increase in any given year that was less than 2%?
● It’s not just about affordability, but about managing expectations.
NBOA
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
Average To-tal FTE
We’re Adding Employees
Source: NBOA Business Office Surveys 2008-13
NBOA
Independent School Revenue StreamsIn general, all operating revenues fall into one of four buckets, and you only have direct control over one of them - tuition.
Tuition
Fundraising
Endowment
Auxiliary Services
NBOA
Independent School ExpensesGreatest % of your budget, in descending order (typical school)
Compensation and Benefits
Facilities
Financial Aid (actually a revenue offset, but for our purposes we will discuss it here)
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
NBOA
SPECTRUM Project Overview
• Objectives and Methodology• Definition of Financial Health• Identification of High Performing Schools• Common Traits Among High Performing Schools in the Project
With generous support from:
NBOA
Objectives
• Learn what great schools are doing that sets them apart.
• Investigate best practices in financial management of independent schools.
Approach
• Jim Collins “Good to Great” matched pair research.
• Compare high-performers to typical to learn what separates them apart.
NBOA
1 3 5
2 4 6
Background research
Quantitative data collection
Qualitativedata collection
Background research
Define financial health of
independentschools
Identify high-performing
school group & “others”
Analysis
NBOA
Process to DevelopDefinition of Financial Health
Background Research
NBOA Panel of Experts
Financial Health of Independent
Schools Defined
Presented at Annual Meeting
Spring 14’
NBOA
Financially healthy schools have the resources to sustain their operations for the long term, relative to their individual missions. These schools have successfully developed and implemented financial plans for both operations and facilities. These plans, funded in part with tuition and fees, also maintain financial reserves which adequately cover all current and projected future obligations.
NBOA SPECTRUM Research Project: Definition of Financial Health
NBOA
SAMPLE Data Points to Distinguish HPS From Others
•Operating Cash Flow Margin
•Financial Aid/Gross Tuition
•Annual Giving•Philanthropic Support
•Primary Selectivity
•Debt Burden•Calculated Age of Facility
•Days Cash on Hand
NBOA
•Definition of financial health used as criteria in selecting 12 schools for “high-performing schools” (HPS) group
•Eight “typical” schools selected for comparison group (others)
Identifying High-performing Schools
NBOA
1. Lean2. Collaborative and focused on clarity
and outcomes3. Academically rigorous4. Guided (not governed by strategic
plan)5. Debt-averse
Common Traits Among High-Performing Schools in SPECTRUM
NBOA
6. Disciplined endowment draw7. Focused on benchmarking8. Top-down decision-making9. Quality, not quantity, in budget
training
Common Traits Among High-Performing Schools in SPECTRUM
NBOA
IMHO: Other Considerations toHelp Secure Your School’s
Financial Future 1. “Know where the mission lives in your budget”
2. Elevate and integrate the role of the business officer at your school
3. Increase classroom capacity without increasing cost…how?
a. Use of Technology
b. Classroom size
c. Faculty professional development and support
4. Provide financial aid to support your mission and within your school’s resources
5. Reduce or eliminate dependency on annual giving and endowment…how?
a. Charge what it costs or reduce your program or both?
b. Fundraise for following year
NBOA
Register now at http://www.nboa.org/events/annual-meeting