neurological risk at younger ages - nittoli schoonbee...neurological risk at younger ages 2012 aaim...

22
Neurological Risk at Younger Ages 2012 AAIM Triennial Paul J. Nittoli, MD MassMutual Financial Group John Schoonbee, MBChB Swiss Re Presentation Objectives Discuss risk stratification of seizure disorders for both disability and life underwriting: clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and lifestyle factors Discuss mortality assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: risk implications of clinical features, diagnostic findings, and disease- modifying medication use

Upload: others

Post on 28-Mar-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Neurological Risk at Younger Ages

2012 AAIM Triennial

Paul J. Nittoli, MDMassMutual Financial Group

John Schoonbee, MBChBSwiss Re

Presentation Objectives

• Discuss risk stratification of seizure disorders for both disability and life underwriting: clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and lifestyle factors

• Discuss mortality assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: risk implications of clinical features, diagnostic findings, and disease-modifying medication use

Brief History of Epilepsy

• 4500-1500 BC: described in Ayurvedic literature (‘apasmara’ = loss of consciousness)

• 1000 BC: described in a Babylonian tablet as supernatural

• 400 BC: Hippocrates’ monograph disputes supernatural cause

• 130-200 AD: Galen theorized it a brain disorder with manifestations governed by the moon (‘lunatics’)

• 1494: Malleus Maleficarum links seizures with witchcraft

• 1800s: John Harvey Kellogg (of corn flake fame) attributed epilepsy to masturbation

Temkin. The Falling Sickness: A history of Epilepsy from the Greeks to the Beginnings of Modern Neurology. 2nd ed. 1971. The Johns Hopkins University Press

Seizure Disorders: Defining Terms

• “an excessive and disorderly discharge of central nervous system tissue on muscle”– John Hughlings Jackson MD, 1870

• Motor (convulsive)

• Sensory

• Autonomic

• Psychic

• Epilepsy: A) 2 unprovoked seizures 24 hrs apart; B) 1 seizure within the context of a predisposing cause

Seizure Disorders: Defining Terms

• Partial (focal) seizures – focal onset• Simple – no alteration of consciousness

• Complex – impaired consciousness

• Generalized seizures – bilateral onset, presumption of impaired consciousness

• Secondary generalization of partial seizures

• Absence (petit mal)

• Tonic +/- clonic (grand mal)

• Juvenile seizure disorders

• Pseudoseizures

Electroencephalogram

• “excessive and disorderly discharge” of cortical neurons

• Anticonvulsants are most effective at blocking propagation of neural activity from the seizure focus

• Asymptomatic interictalspikes may be present

• Absence of epileptiformdischarges does not rule out a seizure disorder

Alternative AED Uses

• Valproic acid: psychiatric, analgesic

• Carbamazepine: psychiatric, analgesic

• Gabapentin: psychiatric, analgesic, menopausal sx

• Lamotrigine: psychiatric, analgesic

• Topiramate: psychiatric, analgesic, substance abuse, obesity

• Levetiracetam: psychiatric, autism, Tourette syndrome

• Primidone: essential tremor, LQTS

• Phenobarbital/ethosuximide/phenytoin: AED only

Seizure Recurrence after AED

Withdrawal• Poor prognostic factors

• Abnormal (sleep-deprived) EEG• Abnormal brain MRI• Poor control with monotherapy• Certain epileptic syndromes (JME)• FHx of seizure disorder• <2-5 years seizure-free on treatment

» 65-75% of pre-adolescents (≤12yo) & 60% of adults who are seizure-free x several years (mean 3 yrs) and w/o negative indicators will remain seizure-free off AEDs)

Neurology 1996;47:600

• Risk windows for relapse in children• 50% during 1st 3-6 months• 60-80% within 1st year• >80% within 1st 5 years

Nonpharmacologic Seizure

Management• Surgery

• Usually done for intractable epilepsy• Generalization improvement• Focal seizures often not ameliorated and may worsen• Residual neurological deficits• Best outcomes: unilateral temporal or hippocampal loci

• Vagal nerve stimulation• Palliative not curative• Partial seizures

• Ketogenic diet• Failure of AED control• Mimics starvation – little or no carbs (Crisco)• Effectiveness: 1/3-1/3-1/3

Occupational and Lifestyle

Precautions

• Motor vehicle operation

• Water• Swimming

• Bathing

• Boating

• Heights

• Fire (esp. cooking-related burns)

• Power tools

• Sports

Epileptic Syndromes - Infancy

• Seizures within 24-48 HOL are often indicative of severe cerebral insult (less common are benign familial & idiopathic neonatal convulsions – begin 48-72 HOL and remit by 2-6 mos)

• Simple febrile seizure• Ages 6mos-5yo, <15 min duration, recurrent in 1/3

• 2x risk for epilepsy c/w general population risk

• West Syndrome/Infantile Spasm• Recurrent trunk/limb flexion “salaam seizures”

• Hypsarrhythmia (severely disordered EEG)

• Remit by 4-5 yo but may have residual mental impairment or seizure disorder

Epileptic Syndromes - Childhood

• Lennox-Gastaut syndrome – poor px

• Rolandic epilepsy• Benign childhood epilepsy w/ centrotemporal spikes

• Onset 5-9yo, disappears during adolescence

• Auto Dom, control w/monotherapy

• Absence (petit mal) seizures• 3Hz spike-and-wave pattern diagnostic

• Complex seizure disorder

• Good AED response; nearly ½ develop GTCS

Epileptic Syndromes - Adolescence

• Most common window of clinical presentation

• Idiopathic seizures

• Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy• Peak incidence 12-18 yrs

• Complex seizure disorder in most

• Control w/low dose monotherapy

• Lifelong seizure risk

Epileptic Syndromes - Adulthood

• Idiopathic

• Trauma

• Intracranial mass lesions

• Intracranial vascular lesions (blood isepileptogenic)

• Infections

• Metabolic encephalopathies

• Substance abuse

Pseudoseizures

• Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

• 20-50% of referrals to tertiary epilepsy centers

• Somatoform disorder vs. factitious

• Typically begin in adolescence but incidence in all ages; 70% female

• Dx by video-EEG monitoring (gold std), provocative techniques, and CPK measurement

Epilepsy-related Mortality

• Japanese population of an epilepsy center (1765); 43 deaths over an 8-year period– Accidents 30% (drowning & head injury)

– SUDEP 23%

– Status epilepticus 16%

– Suicide 14% (all temporal lobe epilepsy)

– Other 16%Fukuchi T, et al. Epilepsy Res 2002;51:233.

• Other community-based studies in Western countries show most of the mortality in accidents and “other” (CNS tumors, vascular disease, pneumonia)Lhatoo SD, et al. Epilepsia 2005;46 s11:36

Status Epilepticus

• Continuous seizures for >1 hour

• Neuronal death: combination of systemic and

CNS- specific factors (intraneuronal calcium)

• Mortality increases with age

• Frequently the initial presentation in children

• Mortality risk is defined by age, etiology, and

ability to achieve control (<5% mortality directly

attributable to SE)

Sudden Unexpected Death in

Epilepsy (SUDEP)• Defined as SUD with or without evidence of a seizure in

a person without identified status epilepticus or toxicological, traumatic, anatomical cause

• Cardiopulmonary etiologies postulated

• Low incidence in community-based cohort: 0.35-2.7/1000 p-yrsLhatoo SD, et al. Epilepsia 2005;46 s11:36

• Risk factors• Males, age 20-40

• Frequent GTC seizures, polytherapy

• Treatment noncompliance

• AlcoholHesdorffer DC, et al. Epilepsia 2011;52:1150

Mohanraj R, et al. Lancet Neurol

2006;5:481

• 890 newly dx 8/91 => 5/01; f/up until 10/03

• Age-gender match to general population

(Scotland) ; avg age 31

• Overall SMR 1.42 (n=890;d=93)• Tx non-responders SMR 2.54 (n=318; d=42)

• Tx responders SMR 0.95 (n=462;d=41)

• Tx unknown response (n=110;d=10)

• Chronic epilepsy data not shown• Unsuccessful tx w/1-9 meds (median 3)

• Treatment response not recorded

Survival Newly-Dx Epilepsy by

Lesion on Brain Imaging

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0 2 4 6 8

Years

% S

uviv

al

Cryptogenic

Symptomatic

Mohanraj R, et al. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:481

Strauss D, Shavelle R, et al. JIM

2003;35:155• CA Dept. of

Developmental Services– 80,682 persons, ages 5-65

yo: 47K w/epilepsy out of 506K total [p-yrs], 266 epilepsy deaths out of 1523 total

– No assist for gait/stairs; ≤moderate MR; no “degenerative illnesses” or “idiopathic epilepsy”(presumably genetic)

– Epilepsy prevalence 10X general population

MR EDR

Epilepsy w/o Events <12

mos

111% 0.3

Epilepsy w/ Event <12

mos (not GTC)

237% 3.0

GTC <12 mos 293% 5.3

Status epilepticus <12

mos

371% 6.4

CDDS pop w/o epilepsy

c/w CA gen’l pop

171% 1.1

Approach to Epilepsy Risk

Assessment• Age

• Occupation/Avocation/MVR

• Seizure type• Focal vs. generalized

• Simple vs. complex

• Seizure Control• Frequency

• Number of AEDs in use

• Altered neuroanatomy• Brain injury/depressed skull fx

• Encephalitis

• SDH/AVM

• CVA

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

• Protons in water align

with the magnetic field of

the MRI coils

• A radiofrequency pulse

causes precession about this alignment

• After the pulse is turned

off, the protons “relax” to

their previous alignment

• Different tissue types

“relax” at different rates

MRI Terminology

• T1 – fat light, H2O dark (blackholes-MS/lacune; white-WMH); used with Gd contrast (active MS plaque)

• T2 – H2O light, fat dark (top right); white-MS plaque,lacune, WMH

• T2 FLAIR – free H2O dark, edema fluid light (bottom right)

• DWI – diffusion-weighted imaging (+) from minutes up to 2 weeks after acute ischemia

What can cause T2 Lesions on MRI?

• Demyelinating Disease

• Infectious illness

• Migraines

• Ischemic disease

• Neurofibromatosis

• Small vascular anomalies

• Unidentified Bright Objects

Multiple Sclerosis

• Lesions separated by space & time– Clinical exam – attack = neuro disturbance ≥

24hrs

– MRI – Gd/T1 or T2

– Lumbar puncture/CSF – oligoclonal IgGbands in CSF

• If suspicion of MS without meeting full criteria → clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)

MS – Signs & Symptoms

• Sensorimotor deficits (many CNS areas)

• Ataxia (parietal lobe/cerebellum/brainstem)

• Neurogenic bladder (multiple CNS areas)

• Internuclear ophthalmoplegia (abbrev. INO; brainstem)

• Facial pain/tic douloureux/trigeminal neuralgia (brainstem; trigeminal nerve)

• Lhermitte sign (cervical spinal cord)

• Cognitive impairment (50% eventually; diffuse cerebral disease)

• Optic neuritis (20% initial sx; optic nerve)

MS – Clinical Subtypes

MS Treatment

• Steroids

• Interferon (IFN)– beta-1a (2 preps, A & R), beta-1b (B)

• Other Immune Modulator – glatiramer acetate (C)

• Lymphocyte Sequestration – fingolimod

• ?mechanism – teriflunomide, BG-12

• Monoclonal Antibody – natalizumab

• Immunosuppressive Agent – mitoxantrone

Oral cladribine development withdrawn by Merck

What Is the Impact of MS on Mortality?

• Uncommon disease(s) + variable clinical course +

expect decades of life after onset = need for large cohort

followed for many years to estimate and categorize risk

• Danish study Onset 1948-86 122,373 p-yr

MS + CIS gen’l pop controls

– SMR from onset = 3.25

– EDR from onset = 13.0/1000 p-yr

– Median survival time from onset = 30 yrs

– Median survival time from diagnosis = 25 yrs(Brønnum-Hansen. Neurology. 1994;44:1901)

(Pokorski RJ. JIM. 1997;29:100)

Underwriting MS – Forks in the Road

• Diagnosis

Indefinite Definite

CIS/ON Early Stage Late Stage

MS – Unfavorable Prognosis =

High Risk

• Immobility- think paralysis or quadriplegia

• Primary or secondary progression

• Brain atrophy & cognitive decline

• Multiple black holes on MRI

• Renal function

• Suicide/MDD/substance abuse

• “novel therapy”• Bee stings, cobra venom, pregnant cow milk

• Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI)

MS – Favorable Prognosis = Better Risk

• ♀ (higher prevalence; better outcomes)

• Younger age @ onset (pivot = 40yo)*

• Low relapse rate in early disease (first 2 years)*

• Complete recovery after relapse*

• Sensory/CN/ON as initial sx (motor/cerebellar worse pxas initial sx)*

• Lower lesion burden & accretion by MRI*

• EDSS = 0-3, 5 yrs after dx

• Response to disease-modifying MS drugs

(*early stage prognostic factors > Scott. Neurology. 2000;55:689.)

Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale

• 10 point scale ranging from no disability (0.0) to death (10.0)

• “Functional systems” used for scores < 4.0

• “Cerebral” = cognition & mood

• Emphasizes ambulation

• Key breakpoints

– 3.0 moderate disability, fully ambulatory

– 6.0 at least unilateral ambulatory assist

– 7.0 wheelchair-dept; indept transfers

Generally, disability correlates with risk(Kurtzke. Neurology. 1983;33:1444.)

EDSS & Mortality

• Canadian study - MS clinic - diagnosis 1972-1985 - insured controls

# EDSS Death MR

1394 0.0-3.5 33 1.60

789 4.0-7.0 58 1.84

165 ≥7.5 24 4.44

2384 115 2.00

(Sadovnick. Neurology. 1992;42:991)

ABCR Drugs – Positive Factors

• In the short-term, they have been shown to reduce relapse-related EDSS progression; frequency of relapses; and MRI characteristics of inflammation

• IFNβ1a vs. placebo in delaying CDMS after CIS w/+MRI: CHAMPS Trial (Jacobs. NEJM. 2000;343:898) RR=0.56 p=0.002

• Other ABCR trials reduce progression to CDMS by ~30%

• For u/w purposes, ABCR drugs are equivalent

IFN Reduces RRMS => SPMS Progression

Trojano M. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:300.

• Observational, non-randomized study, median f/u 5.7 yrs (up to 7 yrs)

• 1103 treated

• 401 untreated (refused; contraindicated; early drug d/c; no relapses in 2yrs & EDSS<3)

• Various ABR drugs

• End points: Secondary progressive dz; stable EDSS 4 or 6

SP EDSS 4 EDSS 6

HR-progression from first visit to end point

0.38

p<0.0001

0.70

p=0.0174

0.60

p=0.0304

Shirani A, et al. JAMA 2012;308(3):247Derfuss T, et al. JAMA 2012;308(3):290

• Well designed observational study failed to show IFN reduced disability progression over a long term (>5yrs)– IFN-treatment group

– 2 untreated groups• Contemporary untreated• Historical untreated

• Caveats– Bias against tx of benign disease

– Underpowered

• IFN reduction in long-term disability, “although plausible, remains unproven”

ABCR Caveats

• Need 6-12 months to determine efficacy• Barriers to Use

– Injection-site reactions– Depression– Flu-symptoms– Fatigue– Headache

• Adherence to therapy– Adherence = acceptance + persistence + compliance– 60-75% adhere for 2-5 yr (IFN)– Adherence rates similar to insulin for type 2 diabetes– Majority who discontinue do so in the first 2 yrs (ABCR)– Other studies show first 6 mos indicative of persistence

(Costello. Medscape J Med. 2008;10:225)

(Tremlett HL. Neurology. 2003;61:551)

% Developing MS vs. MRI Lesion at Presentation

69

82

4

12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

CIS & abnl MRI CIS & nl MRI

5 years

10 years

Sailer et al. Neurology

1999;52:599

MS Risk After Optic Neuritis Based on MRI Lesion Load

• Cumulative Probablility of MS vs. Lesions at Dx

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 Lesions 1-2 Lesions 3+ Lesions

5Years

10Years

15Years

ON Study Group. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:727.

MS Risk After Optic Neuritis Based on MRI Lesion Load

• Conditional Probablility of MS vs. Lesions at Dx

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 lesions 1+ lesions

0-5Years

6-10Years

11-15Years

ON Study Group. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:727.

Approach to MS Risk Assessment

• MRI

• Lesion burden & accretion

• Black holes

• Relapse rate

• Frequency

• Proximity to pre-lapse baseline

• Clinical subtype

• EDSS – 3 & 6 are important scores

• Disease-modifying therapy

• Response to treatment

• Medication choice

• Markers of high risk