neutron and gamma ray measurements for fusion...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Neutron and gamma ray measurements
for fusion experiments and spallation sources
Carlo Cazzaniga
Supervisor: prof.ssa Claudia RiccardiExternal supervisor: dr. Marco Tardocchi1
1) Istituto di Fisica del Plasma “Piero Caldirola”
2
Overview
● Motivation
● Gamma ray spectroscopy for fusion plasmas with the LaBr3 detector
● Development of neutron detectors
– Gas detector for thermal neutrons
– Proton recoil spectrometers for fast neutrons
3
Why is fast ion physics important in fusion research?
● The Tokamak is the most promising configuration for magnetic confinement fusion
Good confinement of alphas is essentially required in realizing a nuclear fusion reactor
Need for diagnostics → neutron and gamma spectrometers
4
Neutron detectors for spallation sources
Why do we need new thermal neutron detectors?
● The shortage of 3He has triggered the search for effective alternative neutron detection technologies
Why wide do we need a wide energy range neutron spectormeter?
● Spectrum up to 800 MeV
● Study of single event effects due to atmospheric neutrons
ISIS spallation source
6
Why measuring γ-rays?
● Gamma-rays are emitted from reactions of fast ions (E>0.5 MeV) with impurities
4α + 9Be → 1n + 12C*
→ 12C + γ (4.44 MeV)
● Studies of fast ions physics → α particles confinement
Informations from gamma-ray spectroscopy:
● Good energy resolution → peak shape analysis (Doppler broadening)
● High rate → to follow transients associated with MHD instabilities
7
The LaBr3 scintillator
Good energy resolution:
• High light yield (63000 photons per MeV)
High efficiency (25% for 4.44 MeV gammas)
• Big volume (3’’x6’’ cylinder)
• High Z and high density (5.08 g/cm3)
High rate capability (up to 2MHz):
• Fast scintillation time (16 nsec)
• PMT with active voltage divider
• ADC acquisition (400 MHz, 14 bit)
8
Validation with radioactive sources
Peak Eγ (keV)
R (%)
137Cs 662 3.360Co 1173 2.560Co 1333 2.4
Good energy resolution thanks to high light yield.
Spectral shape as expected (full energy peaks, compton edges, backscatt. peak)
Good agreement with MCNP simulation.
Small difference is ascribed to minor differences between the MCNP model and the actual experimental setup
9
Detector setup at JET
● The detector is now installed at JET above the roof lab.
● It shares the vertical line of sight with other gamma-ray detectors (HPGe, NaI)
~4m
LaBr3
LaBr3
10
Fast ion studies using γ−ray emission spectroscopy at JET
● Low density plasmas with high ICRH (Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating) RF power
● Several γ-ray peaks are observed from different reactions among fast ions and impurities, such as 9Be(α,nγ)12C, 12C(d,pγ)13C and 9Be(d,pγ )10Be, and have energies from Eγ = 3 to 4.5 MeV.
11
Detector response to neutron background
● Inelastic scattering → gammas
● (n,2n) → gammas + more neutrons → inelastic scattering → gammas
● Delayed counts:
79Br (n,2n) 78Br → 78Se + β+ (τ = 9 min) (e.p. 2.6 MeV)
81Br (n,2n) 80Br (90%) → 80Kr + β- (τ = 25 min)(e.p. 2 MeV)
(10%) → 80Se + β+ (τ = 25 min)(e.p. 0.4 MeV)
elastic inelastic (n,2n) Radiative capture
others
2.5 MeV La139: 3 bBr81: 2 bBr79: 2 b
La139: 2 bBr81: 1.8 bBr79: 1.8 b
0 ≈ 10-2 b 0
14 MeV La139: 4 bBr81: 3 bBr79: 2 b
La139: 0.6 bBr81: 0.3 bBr79: 0.3 b
La139: 1.5 bBr81: 1 bBr79: 1 b
≈ 10-3 b < 0.2 b
Cross sections relevant for fusion neutron background
12
Outline of measurements and simulations
Fusion plasmas
● AUG (DD reaction, 2.5 MeV neutrons)
● JET (DD reaction, 2.5 MeV neutrons)
Frascati Neutron Generator (FNG)
● DD reaction, 2.5 MeV neutrons
● DT reaction, 14 MeV neutrons
Simulations
● Simple model: mono-energetic neutrons on crystal only
● Simulation of produced gamma rays
● Simulation of detector response
13
Neutron induced background spectrum
Simulations of 2.5 MeV neutrons agree with data
Different measurements confirm it's neutrons
14
High rate neutron measurements at JET
• Temporal evolution of the counting rate of the LaBr3 spectrometer and JET total neutron yield measured with the fission chambers for discharge #82539.
• DD plasmas with high NBI (Neutral Beam Injection) have a high neutron yield, mostly from beam-plasma reactions
15
Measured (linear fit) Predicted (MCNP + transport)
slope 0.88 · 10-10 (0.9 ± 0.3) · 10-10
intercept 2 · 103 1.5 · 103
16
How to handle neutron background on ITER?
TO DO NEXT
● Detailed MCNP simulations
● Characterization of neutron shielding (6LiH)
● Line of sight optimization
● Neutron flux at this position: up to ~ 108 – 109 neutron cm-2 s-1
on the detector: 5 109 – 5 1010 neutrons / sec
18
bGEM for thermal neutrons
The 10 B(n,α)7 Li reaction → thermal neutrons
Neutron conversion Charge particle detector
GEM (Gas Electron Multiplier) ElectronsElectrons
IonsIons
60 %
40 %
● Single Boron Layer: Low efficiency (1%)
● Three-dimensional structures: What efficiency can we achieve?
19
Testing the prototype
IN THE LAB
● Calibration with X-ray sources
● Gain as function of measurement parameters
● Response to background gamma rays
AT THE NEUTRON SOURCE
● First measurement of thermal neutron with single converter layer
Assembly of the bGEM detector using the cathode with single converter layer.
20
Characterization of a GEM detector
Peak position changes with the gain
Photo-peak of 55Fe (6 keV)
21
Experimental test at ISIS● The bGEM detector successfully measured the thermal neutron beam
profile
● a TOF measurement was performed
● Beam Profile Measurement and detector counting rate using Cd filters (imaging)
● Thermal neutron efficiency as a function of the detector gain
23
TPR detection principle
● Energy range
● Efficiency
● Energy resolution
choose
● Target thickness and area
● Angle and distance
● Proton spectrometer (type, material, dimensions)
● Acquisition system
24
TPR for fusion● Two prototype of proton spectrometers
(YAP and LaBr3 scintillators) tested in the
lab with X and gamma rays
● Gamma and neutron background evaluated through MCNP simulations and measurements at FNG
Peak Energy
LaBr3
Resolution
YAP Resolution
Cs137 662 keV 4.2% 5.5%Co60 1172 keV 3.5% 3.8%Co60 1333 keV 3.7% 3.8%
25
TPR for spallation sources
● neutrons
n
YAP 1''x1''
Phototube
Mounting in Milano
Test at ISIS spallation source
Pulse acquired with digital system
26
Results of first test at ISIS
● Some recoil protons observed, but bkg is too high
● T must stand for Telescope → need for delta E detector
Gamma flashesFast neutron events
27
Conclusion
The LaBr3 gamma ray
spectrometer
Gas detector with boron layer
Proton recoil spectrometers
Diamond detectors
What is the right measurement technique for your application?
28
Courses
● Schools
● Sokendai Asian Winter School 2011: " New direction of plasma physics and fusion science for future energy "
● 11th Kudowa Summer School: "Towards Fusion Energy"● MCNPX Intermediate Workshop
● Classes
● Radioattività● Introduzione alla fisica dello stato solido
29
Publications
Papers on peer-reviewed journals
● C. Cazzaniga et al. “Response of the LaBr3 gamma-ray spectrometer to fusion neutrons”, to be submitted
● M. Nocente, M. Garcia-Munoz, G. Gorini, M. Tardocchi, A. Weller, S. Akaslompolo, R. Bilato, V. Bobkov, C. Cazzaniga, B. Geiger, G. Grosso, A. Herrmann, V.G. Kiptily, M. Maraschek, R. McDermott, J.M. Noterdaeme, Y. Podoba, G.Tardini and the ASDEX Upgrade Team, "Gamma-ray spectroscopy measurements of fast ions on ASDEX Upgrade", Nucl. Fusion 52 (2012) 094021
Conference proceedings
● C. Cazzaniga, M. Nocente, M. Tardocchi, L. Giacomelli, G. Croci, C. Riccardi and G. Gorini, “The LaBr3 Gamma Ray Spectrometer for
ITER diagnostics”, proceedings of the 11th Kudowa Summer School, “Towards Fusion Energy”, June 11-15, 2012
● Nocente, M. Angelone, C. Cazzaniga, I. Chugunov, R.C. Pereira, G. Croci, D. Gin, G. Grosso, A. Neto, A. Olariu, S. Olariu, M. Pillon, A. Shevelev, J. Sousa, M. Tardocchi and G. Gorini,“Gamma-ray measurements and neutron sensitivity in a fusion environment”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on “Fusion for Neutrons and Subcritical Nuclear Fission”, Varenna, 2011