New gTLDs: Getting to the Next Round GDD Summit | 17 May 2016

| 2

Overview of Current Work

Discussion: New gTLD Overall

Issues / Demand for additional New

gTLDs?

Work Tracks

What are the Key Issues? (15 min)

Path Forward to Address Key Issues

Questions?

1 2 3

4 5 6

Session Agenda

Overview of Current Work Karen Lentz, ICANN

| 4

Reviewing the New gTLD Program

ProgramReviews•  ICANNsupportsstudiesandanalysistoinformmul5stakeholderassessment

oftheProgram'sprogresstowarditsgoals•  EnablesICANNtocapturemul5plestakeholderexperiencesinthelaunch

andopera5onoftheProgramandapplythoselessonslearnedmovingforward

PolicyDevelopment•  GNSOisresponsibleforrecommendingsubstan5vepoliciesrela5ngto

gTLDs•  Nowconduc5ngworkonpossiblepolicychanges:

•  NewgTLDSubsequentProceduresPDPwillevaluatetheexperiencesofthe2012roundandproposepolicyrecommenda5ons,ifnecessary,forchangestosubsequentprocesses.

•  ReviewingRightsProtec5onMechanisms(inAllgTLDs)PDPwilltoreviewanddeterminewhethermodifica5onstoexis5ngRPMsareneeded.

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

q  CDAR Root Stability

Competition, Choice, and Trust (CCT) Review Team

q  Consumer/Registrant Surveys

q  Economic Studies

þ  Rights Protection Mechanisms

þ  Program Implementation

q  DNS Abuse

New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP

49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63

CCT Review Team Work and Inputs

Policy Development Processes (PDPs)

q  Trademark Clearinghouse

ICANN Meetings

Independent Reviews

Current Quarter

New gTLD Overall Issues Jeff Neuman, Valideus USA

| 7

Charter

•  OriginalPolicyRecommenda5ons:Astheoriginalpolicyrecommenda5onsasadoptedbytheGNSOCouncilandICANNBoardhave“beendesignedtoproduceasystemizedandongoingmechanismsforapplicantstoproposenewtop-leveldomains”,thosepolicyrecommenda5onsremaininplaceforsubsequentroundsoftheNewgTLDProgramunlesstheGNSOCouncilwoulddecidetomodifythosepolicyrecommenda5onsviaapolicydevelopmentprocess.

•  IssuestoAddress:•  Clarifying,amendingoroverridingexis5ngpolicyprinciples,

recommenda5ons,andimplementa5onguidance;•  Developingnewpolicyrecommenda5ons;•  Supplemen5ngordevelopingnewimplementa5onguidance

| 8

Impressions of the 2012 Round?

“Attheendofthefirstapplica3onround,whenalltheapplica3onshavebeendealtwith,willthegTLDprogramlookmorelikeanexerciseinwastedresourcesthananimportantcyberspaceinnova3on?”

-- Looking Back on the First Round of New gTLD Applications: Implications for the F u t u r e o f D o m a i n N a m e R e g u l a t i o n b y J a c q u e l i n e D . L i p t o n , https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/gcig_no31web.pdf

| 9

Overall Questions •  ShouldthereinfactbenewgTLDsubsequentproceduresandifnot,whatare

thejus5fica5onsforandramifica5onsofdiscon5nuingtheprogram?

•  Predictability:Howcanchangestotheprogramintroduceda\erlaunch(e.g.,digitalarchery/priori5za5onissues,namecollision,registryagreementchanges,publicinterestcommitments(PICs),etc.)beavoided?

•  Compe55on,ConsumerTrust,andConsumerChoice:Didtheimplementa5onmeetordiscouragethesegoals?–CCTReviewTeam.

•  CommunityEngagement:Howcanpar5cipa5onfromthecommunitybebe_erencouragedandintegratedduringthepolicydevelopmentprocess,implementa5on,andexecu5on?

•  TLDDifferen5a5on?Brands,Geos,Communi5es–Doesonesizefitall?

•  Applica5onOrder:ShouldtherebeaBrandroundbeforeothers?

| 10

VS

•  In1999thecommunitycametoconsensusthatthereshouldbenewgTLDstos5mulatecompe55on

•  HavingnewgTLDswoulds5mulateinnova5on

•  Expecta5onthattherewillbenewgTLDssodidn'tapplyinthefirstround

•  Couldbeviewedasan5-compe55venottogoforward;couldbeacompe55vedisadvantageifthereisnotanewroundforthosewhodidnotapplyinthefirstround.

•  Addi5onalbrandscouldhelppropelthecurrentlevelofregistra5onsand/orsuccess

•  TopromotemorediversityinnewgTLDs•  Tofurtherenhanceconsumerchoice,

consumertrust,andcompe55on

Yes No

•  NewgTLDshasbeenaplaygroundforrampantfraudandabusefortrademarkholdersandothers.

•  ToomanyTLDsarefailing.•  NumbersofRegistra5onsshowfailureof

newgTLDs.•  Issueoffuturedemandgiventhesecond

leveldomainsthatareavailable•  Wedon'thaveasuccessbartosay

whetheragivenmetricis/isnotasuccess

•  Domainsboughtforspecula5vepurposesnotuse

•  Applicantsgamedthesystemtogetaroundbackgroundchecks

Should there be Additional New gTLDs?

| 11

Should we Add New gTLDs in “Rounds”?

Rounds (Pros) •  Predictabilityofcycles•  Morecosteffec5veifevalua5onproceduresareextensiveandrepe55ve•  Rightsholders(includingRegistries)donothavetobeontheirtoescon5nuously,watchingfor

newapplica5ons.•  Iden5calapplica5ons-conten5onsets--areeasiertomanage.Alsoarguablymorefairtohave

conten5onsetsratherthanfirstcome,firstserved.•  Globalrulesandboardac5onscanaddressallnewapplicantspriortoaround.Soroundsallow

forconsistencyinrules.•  Roundsteeuptheapplica5onsforauc5onsbe_erthanacon5nuingopenapplica5onwindow.•  Roundsallowforsubsequentreviewsandacycleofimprovement.

Rounds (Cons) •  Ar5ficial5mebarriers•  Addinglatency,increasing5metomarket•  Createsar5ficialdemandandar5ficialscarcity•  Timingbetweenroundsmayleaduptoar5ficialpentupdemand

| 12

If not Rounds, Then What?

Brainstorm Ideas

Work Streams

| 14

Work Stream 1: Process / Support/Outreach: •  ApplicantGuidebook(AGB):IstheAGBtherightimplementa5onoftheGNSO

recommenda5onsforallpar5es(ROs,RSPs,EscrowProviders)?•  ClarityofApplica5onProcess:Howcantheapplica5onprocessavoiddeveloping

processesonanas-neededbasis(e.g.,clarifyingques5onprocess,changerequestprocess,customersupport,etc.)

•  Accredita5onPrograms:AsthereappearstobealimitedsetoftechnicalserviceandEscrowproviders,wouldtheprogrambenefitfromanaccredita5onprogramforthirdpartyserviceproviders?Ifso,wouldthissimplifytheapplica5onprocesswithasetofpre-qualifiedproviderstochoosefrom?

•  Systems:HowcanthesystemsusedtosupporttheNewgTLDProgram,suchasTAS,CentralizedZoneDataService,Portal,etc.bemademorerobust,userfriendly,andbe_erintegrated?

•  Applica5onFees:Evaluateaccuracyofcostes5matesand/orreviewthemethodologytodevelopthecostmodel.

•  SupportforApplicantsFromDevelopingCountries

| 15

Work Stream 2: Legal / Regulatory

•  ReservedNamesListandMechanismforRelease•  BaseRegistryAgreement/Differen5a5on?•  PICs?Isthistherightswaytoimplementrestric5ons?•  RegistrantProtec5ons•  ContractualCompliance•  Registry/RegistrarSepara5on•  RegistrarNon-Discrimina5on•  TLDRollout•  2ndLevelRPMs–[RightsProtec5onMechanismsPDP]•  GlobalPublicInterest/GACAdvice/Safeguards•  IGO/INGOProtec5ons•  ClosedGenerics

| 16

Work Stream 3: String Contention / Objections & Disputes

•  FreedomofExpressionvs.GACAdvice,communityprocessesandreservednames

•  StringSimilarityEvalua5ons(effec5ve?Fair?Efficient?)•  Objec5ons–Reviewrulesaroundstanding,fees,consolida5on,consistencyofoutcomes?Appeals?OversightoverProcess/

•  RoleofIndependentObjector•  AccountabilityMechanisms•  CommunityApplica5onsandCommunityPriorityEvalua5ons

| 17

Work Stream 4: Internationalized Domain Names

Interna5onalizedDomainNamesandUniversalAcceptance:Considerhowtoencourageadop5onofgTLDs.EvaluatewhetherrulesaroundIDNsproperlyaccountedforrecommenda5onsfromIDNWG.Determineandaddresspolicyguidanceneededfortheimplementa5onofIDNvariantTLDs.

| 18

Work Stream 5: Technical & Operations

•  SecurityandStability:Weretheproperques5onsaskedtominimizetherisktotheDNSandensurethatapplicantswillbeabletomeettheirobliga5onsintheregistryagreement?

•  Shouldtherebenon-scoredques5onsandifso,howshouldtheybepresented?

•  Werethepropercriteriaestablishedtoavoidcausingtechnicalinstability?

•  ApplicantReviews:Technical/Opera5onalandFinancial:WereFinancialandTechnicalcriteriadesignedproperlytoallowapplicantstodemonstratetheircapabili5eswhileallowingevaluatorstovalidatetheircapabili5es?

•  NameCollision:Whatmeasuresmaybeneededtomanagerisksfor2012-roundgTLDsbeyondtheir2yearanniversaryofdelega5on,orgTLDsdelegatedpriortothe2012round?

What are the Key Issues That Must be Resolved Prior to Additional New gTLDs?

What is the Path Forward?

Questions