new orleans sewerage and water board - swbno.org mitigation/hazard mitigation... · sewerage and...
TRANSCRIPT
Introductions
About the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans
Hazard Mitigation Planning
Mitigation Projects
Summary
Public Comments
Wrap-Up
Agenda
Team Introductions
Sewerage and Water BoardMarcia St. Martin, Executive Director
Emergency Management OperationsJason HigginbothamTom Miller
Environmental Affairs DivisionGordon Austin Harvey Stern
Community and Intergovernmental RelationsRobert Jackson
GAEA Engineering ConsultantsTonja Koob, PhD, PE, LEED, AP, CFM - Consulting Engineer
Lambert EngineersPaul Seldes, FPEM, CHS-III - Hazard Mitigation Consultant & Project ManagerDennis Lambert, PE
What is “Hazard Mitigation”?
Any sustained measures undertaken to reduce or eliminate the risks posed by natural and/or manmade hazards on a place and its population.
Hazard Mitigation Plan:
A plan to reduce a community’s risk and exposure to disasters
Local governments must have a local hazard mitigation plan to apply for certain federal grant programs
What is a Hazard Mitigation Plan?
It all boils down to two basic questions:
1.What hazards present the greatest risk to the region and its citizens?
2.What are the most effective ways to reduce those risks?75% of Louisiana’s natural disaster
declarations in the past decade involved flooding.
Louisiana has more repetitively flooded properties than any other state.
What is “Hazard Mitigation”?
Hazard mitigation measures can include structural projects like levees, dams, or building safe rooms…
What is “Hazard Mitigation”?
… non-structural projects like acquisition, elevation, retrofit of buildings, or vegetation management…
What is “Hazard Mitigation”?
…regulatory & policy practices like enacting or enforcing building codes, permits, or land use policies…
What is “Hazard Mitigation”?
…training and educational programs for communities, local and State agencies…
Regulatory Requirements
The Stafford Act - Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ActDMA 2000 – Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000HMGP – Hazard Mitigation Grant Program44 CFR 201 – Code of Federal Regulations
Plan must be submitted to State (GOHSEP) and FEMA for approval.DMA 2000 requires the plan be updated every 5 years
More information on HMGP available at http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/hmgp/index.shtmThe State of Louisiana Hazard Mitigation Plan: http://gohsep.la.gov/mitigation/statehazmitplan_08/hazmitigatpln_08.htm
Why does the Sewerage & Water Board need a plan?
The purpose of this project is to develop a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) that complies with the HMGP (Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) and classifies the Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans as a single, local jurisdiction. As a single, local jurisdiction with a LHMP, the S&WB is directly eligible for various FEMA grant funding programs and reimbursements.This LHMP represents a “new” local plan. Prior hazard planning for the S&WB was conducted under the City of New Orleans.
Planning Process Overview
There is a lot of jargon that is used to describe the planning process. We’ll try to be jargon free.
This graphic shows the process recommended by FEMA. We’ll go thru this step-by-step.
How is the Plan Structured?
Introduction and processIdentification of hazards and threats from natural or manmade sourcesAssessment of risks to populations, property, economiesCritical Facility DataAssessment of capability for hazard mitigationAction plans to reduce riskPlan Implementation and Maintenance
Phase 1 – Organize Resources
Assess Community Support
Build the Planning Team
Engage the Public*
Organize resources and process
Phase 2 – Assess Risks
Risk assessment answers the fundamental question that fuels the natural hazard mitigation planning process: "What would happen if a natural hazard event occurred in this area?"
Risk assessment is the process of measuring the potential loss of life, personal injury, economic injury, and property damage resulting from natural hazards by assessing the vulnerability of people, buildings, and infrastructure to natural hazards.
Hazards – Identification & Profiles
proposed hazardsHurricane/tropical cyclone – flood Hurricane/tropical cyclone – wind
Flood Levee Failure
Earthquake Storm Surge
Tornado Hazardous Materials
Pandemic Cyber Attack
Terrorism/Civil Unrest Hailstorm
Disaster aftermath Subsidence
Severe storms Drought
Lightning Wildfire
Severe Heat/Cold Winter Storm
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment
Flood Risk, high winds and other hazards can be based on historical dataOther hazards (storm surge, subsidence) can be assessed on estimations of future risk
Vulnerability Assessment
As part of the assessment we also:
1.Assess relative importance or “criticality” of facilities
2.Assess risk to facilities from different hazards, based upon estimated losses
The S&WB network is widespread and complex and serves as part of the perimeter defense for the City
of New Orleans.
Critical Facilities
Algiers Water PlantAlgiers Water TankAlgiers Intake 1 & 2Carrollton Water PlantCarrollton Intake 1 & 2Carrollton Power Generation Plant*Drainage Pumping Stations (21)East Bank STPMichoud Water TankSewer Pumping Stations (66) *West Bank Sewerage Treatment Plant (STP)
* Not identified in original City plan
Critical Facility Mapping
S&WB network and Katrina inundation
S&WB network – population density
S&WB network – primary care facilities (hospitals)
S&WB network – emergency services (police/fire/EMS)
Estimating Potential Losses
Loss Estimation Table based on hazard profileEstimate loss to structure
Estimate loss to contents
Estimate loss of use
Estimate human loss Hazard Type Moderate Criteria (Yellow) High Criteria (Orange) Extreme Criteria (Red)
Floods Structures prone to less than
1 foot flooding
Structures prone to 1 to 4 feet flooding "Mobile homes in floodplain Critical facilities in floodplain Structures in floodway
Tornadoes Pre-wind code structures Historic buildings Critical facilities
Mobile homes "Pre-wind code critical facilities Overhead power lines
Coastal Storms
Structures near the shoreline Structures in the 100-year floodplain
Pre-flood or pre-wind code structures near the shoreline (including A or X zones) Critical facilities near the shore-line (including A or X zones) "
Structures located in coastal V zones
Wildfires
Structures in close proximity to areas with light or medium fuels with slopes less than 40%
Structures in close proximity to areas with medium fuels with slopes 41-60%
Critical facilities in close proximity to areas with medium fuels and slopes 41 percent+ Other structures in close proximity to areas with medium fuels and slopes 61 percent+ " Other structures in close proximity to areas with heavy fuels and slopes 41 percent+ "
Phase 3 – Develop a Mitigation Plan
The data gathered in the previous phases and the information revealed in the hazard profiles and loss estimation will be used to develop mitigation goals and objectives.
Mitigation goals are guidelines that explain what you want to achieve.
Mitigation objectives are statements that detail how those goalswill be achieved.
Phase 3 – Develop a Mitigation Plan
1. Review the findings of Phase 1 & 22. Note the causal factors for each hazard3. Note the hazard characteristics4. Note which important and/or critical assets identified
in Phase 2 are located in hazard areas.5. Identify specific characteristics of assets in hazard
areas that contribute to their vulnerability6. Develop a list of problem statements based on these
findings.7. Conduct a local capability assessment8. Develop goals and objectives
Plan & Strategy
Develop a Mitigation Plan
Range of actions consideredExisting Structures
Future Structures
Analysis of mitigation actions
Prioritization MethodologyBenefit Cost Analysis (BCA)
S Social Mitigation actions are acceptable to the community if they do not adversely affect a particular segment of the population, do not cause relocation of lower income people, and if they are compatible with the community’s social and cultural values.
T Technical Mitigation actions are technically most effective if they provide long- term reduction of losses and have minimal secondary adverse impacts.
A Administrative Mitigation actions are easier to implement if the jurisdiction has the necessary staffing and funding
P Political Mitigation actions can truly be successful if all stakeholders have been offered an opportunity to participate in the planning process and if there is public support for the action.
L Legal It is critical that the jurisdiction or implementing agency have the legal authority to implement and enforce a mitigation action.
E Economic Budget constraints can significantly deter the implementation of mitigation actions. Hence, it is important to evaluate whether an action is cost- effective, as determined by a cost benefit review, and possible to fund.
E Environmental Sustainable mitigation actions that do not have an adverse effect on the environment, that comply with Federal, State, and local environmental regulations, and that are consistent with the community’s environmental goals, have mitigation benefits while being environmentally sound.
STAPLEE Criteria for Mitigation
Mitigation Actions
No. Priority Description Project Cost
EstimatePossible
Funding
Sources
Time/Duration Goals &
ObjectivesLead Manager Hazards
1 H Dwyer Intake Canal Construction $9,300,000 Parish
Budget/
USACOE
2006 Improve
drainage in
Eastern
New
Orleans
Sewerage and
Water Board
of New
Orleans
Floods,
Hurricanes,
Thunderstorms
2 H Pump Station Upgrade ‐
Drainage Pumping
Station (DPS) #6$8,600,000 Parish
Budget/
Jefferson
Parish
2006‐2009 Increases
the water
pumping
capacity of
Uptown
and
Lakeview
Sewerage and
Water Board
of New
Orleans,
Jefferson
Parish
Floods,
Hurricanes,
Thunderstorms
3 H Construction of Concrete lined canals on
Florida Avenue from DPS #19 to Peoples
Avenue
$42,700,000 Parish
Budget/
USACOE
2006‐2009 Increases
drainage of
Gentilly,
Bywater,
and Upper
9th Ward
Sewerage and
Water Board
of New
Orleans
Floods,
Hurricanes,
Thunderstorms
Monitor and Update the Plan
The plan is typically a “living” document
DMA 2000 requires that plans are updated every 5 years
The plan should also be evaluated and revised following actual disasters
Evaluate the process
Implement the Plan
FEMA Recovery Work to Date
SWB Estimated Project Costs $385,844,865.89
Currently Obligated by FEMA 255,353,592.81
Total Paid by State to SWB 154,141,042.60
•Katrina Recovery Sewer Program•Katrina Recovery Water Program•Katrina Recovery Drainage Program•Storm Proofing Program•SSERP Program•SELA•Submerged Roads Program•Other Projects
Anticipated Projects
•16 of 83 SPS currently operating at design capacity•Contracts 3632, 3634, 3658 and 3660
Repair 26 stations by September 2010Scheduled to bid November 2009
•Contracts 3676, 3659, 3677 and 3678Repair of 11 stations by December 30, 2010scheduled to bid December 2009
•Contracts 3633 and 3671Repair of 12 SPS by April 2011scheduled to bid in Dec 2009 and Jan 2010
•Contracts 3630, 3631 and 3672Repair of 12 SPS by July 11, 2011scheduled to bid January 2010
•Contracts 3673 and 3674 repair of 6 SPS by 2012 and 2013scheduled to bid Dec 2009 and Jan 2010
Repairs to 67 SPS - Valued at over $50 million
Katrina Recovery Sewer Program
Katrina Recovery Water Program
•Structural Repairs to Buildings at Central Yard Garage #1, Garage #2, Annex Building, Generator Room, Administration Building, Machine and Mill Shop, Shed #6, Tire shop, Body Shop
•EBWWTP Administration Building Replacement
•Structural Repairs to Buildings at Carrollton PlantMeter Shop, Water Intake #1, Water Gallery, Welding and Fabrication Building, Old Filter Building, Boiler Room, High and Low Lift, Frequency Changer
•Carrollton Power Plant Repair
Katrina Recovery Drainage
•Repairs to 11 Underpass Drainage Stations
•Repairs to Drainage Pumping Stations 19, 4, 13 and D
SELA
•Florida Ave Canal Phase I to bid in fall of 2009-1300 feet of 50x15 u box plus major utility relocations
•General DeGaulle Crossings to bid in fall of 2009-Expansion of drainage under six vehicular bridges
•Napoleon Ave Canal Phase 1 to bid January 2010-4300 linear feet of U box Claiborne to Carondelet
•Claiborne Canal Phase 1 to bid March of 2010-New box culvert from Monticello to Leonidas
•Jefferson Ave canal Phase 1 to bid June of 2010-New box culvert from Claiborne to Dryades
Storm Proofing of Drainage Facilities
Ten Projects to bid in 2009-2010•15 MW Generator at Carrollton Plant in 2009•60 Hz underground electrical feeder•Carrollton Plant Perimeter •River Intakes Structural Hardening•DPS 5 Pumps, Generator and Hardening•DPS 20 and DPS 6 Structural Hardening•DPS 13 Generator and Structural Hardening•DPS 7 Generator and Structural Hardening•DPS 1, 2, 4, 12, 19 and I-10 Structural Hardening•DPS 11, 14 and 16 Structural Hardening
$204,000,000 in storm proofing projects
SSERP
•Program to remediate sanitary sewer defects
•Under force majeure since Katrina
•Negotiations on going to modify decree
•Completion deadlines anticipated for 2015
Next Meeting
Next meeting to be held prior to plan adoption.
The date, time and location will be advertised
Contact
For more information or questions contact:
Mr. Jason Higginbotham
Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans
Emergency Management Operations625 St. Joseph St.—Room 117, NO 70165
(504) 585-2020
Questions & Comments
Hazard Mitigation Plan ConsultantsLambert Engineers, LLC
Paul G. Seldes – Hazard Mitigation Consultant
504-529-7687