new sam guckenheimer product owner, visual studio product line … · 2019. 12. 16. · for (target...

63
Sam Guckenheimer Product Owner, Visual Studio Product Line [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 18-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Sam Guckenheimer

    Product Owner, Visual Studio Product Line

    [email protected]

  • 7

    49

    340

    2,400

    17,000

    120,000

    840,000

    5,900,000

    41,000,000

    290,000,000

    2,000,000,000

    1. Scrum Team Size

    2. Scrum of Scrums 2.6 Dunbar’s Number

    4. Microsoft Developer Division

    8. Our Customers (Users)

    11. Our Customer’s Customers

    6. Microsoft Employees

    This

    experience

    report

  • − Industry Trends

  • For (target customer personas in identified

    segment)

    Who are

    dissatisfied with

    (the current …alternatives)

    Our solution is a (product category)

    That provides (key problem-solving capability)

    Unlike (the product alternative)

    We have

    assembled

    (key scenarios and QoS for your

    solution)

    Adapted from Geoffrey A. Moore, Crossing the Chasm (New York: Harper Collins, 1991, 1992, 2002), p. 154.

  • http://www.ideo.com/cbd

  • Feature

    Absent

    Feature Fully

    Implemented

    Cu

    sto

    mer

    Dis

    gu

    sted

    C

    ust

    om

    er

    Delig

    hte

    d

    Must-haves

    (remove dissatisfiers)

    Exciters/

    Delighters/

    Energizers

    “Linear” features

    (satisfiers)

    Indifferent

    features

  • 21

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

    Satisfaction

    Im

    po

    rtan

    ce

    Opportunities Not Opportunities

    Immediate Opportunities – Important & Unsatisfied

    Important & Satisfied

    Lower Priority Opportunities

    Unimportant & Satisfied

  • Team observing

    Stickies and

    Voting sheets

    Customers

  • Importance to

    your business Satisfaction

    with Existing Notes

    Most

    important

    Least

    important

    Does the existing

    functionality meet

    your needs?

    Pain (mark with 'x')

    (mark with 'x') Yes No Don't

    know Once I work with something I can’t find it again

    I can’t tell what changed from build to build, especially over time

    I don’t know who is the expert of a given area

    I need another pair of eyes on my code

  • Means to the Interactive Discussion

  • 27

    Suit the action to the word, the word to the action, ….and …hold as 'twere the

    mirror up to nature Hamlet III:2

  • Pillar

    Scenario Scenario

    Epic: Why buy or upgrade

    Contains Customer Promises:

    What if you could ….?

    E Experience Theme:

    Let me show you how….?

    Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature User Story / Product Backlog Item:

    Product capability to enable

    Rele

    ase

    Pla

    nn

    ing

    Sp

    rin

    t P

    lan

    nig

    & Exe

    cuti

    on

  • − Pain: Waste in Developer-Tester Interaction

    − VS 2010 Scenario: No More No Repro − What if you could reduce your bug reactivation by 80%?

    − Experiences − As a tester, I can explore the app and file a bug that

    automatically captures full motion video, complete action log, IntelliTrace logs from the servers and snapshot of virtualized test environment.

    − As a developer, I can open the bug, see what happened both in the UI and at multiple tiers, debug offline − backwards from actual fault to root cause, and click into the code editor to fix the fault. When I check-in the fix, I can automatically generate a test to prevent regression.

    − Quality of Service (NFR): It all has to be fast enough to keep us in the groove.

  • http://www.ideo.com/cbd

  • http://www.ideo.com/cbd

  • 36

    Money - Microsoft Visual C#.NET [design] - Money.cs

    Run Test

    Test Explorer

    Scope By

    Browse By

    Solution

    All Tests by Area

    Serv

    er E

    xplo

    rer

    Test Explorer

    Suggested Tests

    | Suggested T… | Reason | Test Run...

    Suggested Tests

    Start Page BugID26005

    Review Bug Details

    View Source History

    Select Workspace

    Walk Through Trace

    Deploy and Run Tests

    Submit Changes

    Title

    Status

    Build

    Reported By

    Assigned To

    Description

    Exchange Rate Mismatch

    Active

    2.1.SP1

    Renee

    See Attached Screenshots

    Melvis

    Properties Dynamic Help

    Properties

    Solution1

    SystemTests

    UnitTests

    testdollar(int)

    testEquals(object)

    testfranc(int)

    testMoney(int,string)

    testPlus(Money)

    testToString()

    testPlus1(Money)

    testPlus1(M…

    testdollar(int)

    testEquals(o...

    testfranc(int)

    testMoney(i...

    testPlus(Mo...

    testToString()

    Explicit

    Explicit

    Previous Cov...

    Previous Cov...

    Explicit

    Calls testdoll...

    Explicit

    Start Page BugID26005

    Money.cs

    Money.Money Plus(Money)

    Money - Microsoft Visual C#.NET [design] - Money.cs

    Task List OutputTest Results

    ! | | | Description | File

    Task List

    BugID 26005

    BugID 26008

    Bug: Exchange Rates don’t match …

    Bug: Conversion Rate error in calc ...

    Test Results Task List | Output

    Test Results

    | Name | Result | Test Log | Test Output

    View Results All Selected Tests By Type

    Executed 7 of 7, 1 Error, 0 skipped

    Create Report

    !

    testdollar(int)

    testEquals(object)

    testfranc(int)

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    UnitTest1

    UnitTest2

    UnitTest3

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Check In

    Class View

    Class ViewSolution Explorer

    Bases and Interfaces

    dollar(int)

    Equals(object)

    franc(int)

    Money(int,string)

    Plus(Money)

    ToString()

    Amount

    Currency

    amount

    Money

    money

    Money

    InvalidCurrencyException

    Bases and Interfaces

    InvalidCurrencyException()

    Test Results Task List | Output

    | Name | Result | Test Log | Test Output

    Test Results

    View Results All Selected Tests By Type - Last Run

    Executed 7 of 7, 1 Error, 0 skipped

    Create Report

    !

    testdollar(int)

    testEquals(object)

    testfranc(int)

    testMoney(int,string)

    testPlus(Money)

    testToString()

    testPlus1(Money)

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Fail

    UnitTest1

    UnitTest2

    UnitTest3

    UnitTest4

    UnitTest5

    UnitTest6

    UnitTest7

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Pointer

    Fail

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Pass

    Code coverage in source

    editor after test runs.

    Code under test

    hyperlinked to tests.

    Integrated unit testing displays test

    results directly in VS, hyperlinked to

    source.

    Test case manager makes all

    tests across team accessible

    and runnable by everyone

    (based on permission).

    During code editing, VS

    displays list of suggested

    (prioritized) tests applicable

    to changed code.

    Coverage summary also in

    class view.

    Sample Wireframe

  • Connected Systems Server Area Prioritization (MVP Summit)

    10 10

    9

    8 8 8

    6

    5

    3

    2

    0

    1

    2

    4

    3

    4 4

    7

    9

    4

    12

    17

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    Diagnostic

    timeline logging

    and viewing

    Service

    Implementation

    integratedd with

    Workflow

    Contract First

    Design

    Top Down

    Design

    Designing and

    Implementing a

    Single Service

    Test Framework

    Integration

    Application

    Deployment

    Database Design Programming

    Model and

    design

    experience

    Authoring and

    Customizing

    Guidance

    Integrated tools

    support for

    legacy systems

    Areas

    # "

    Do

    ts"

    Experiences

    within scenario

    “Invest more”

    ranking by

    audience

    “Invest less”

    ranking by

    audience

  • http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=we+the+people

  • http://www.ideo.com/cbd

  • Security

    Lots of Audiences

    Architects

    Information

    Workers

    Practical

    Programmer

    s

    Business

    Analysts

    Testers

    Developer

    Build

    Masters

    Dev

    Managers

    Complexity

    Kings

    Vital

    Vendors

    Technical

    Decision

    Makers

    Network

    Admins

    Designers

    Business

    Students

    Database

    Admins

    Authors

    Trainers

  • High Touch – Dedicated PG resources

    working with customer. Expect case

    study, course-correcting feedback,

    reference, etc.

    Managed – Access to private

    resources with managed

    support channels and early

    readiness. NDA required;

    expect feedback.

    Public – Access to

    published resources and

    support via traditional pre-

    release feedback channels.

    No set expectations.

    Dog

    Food VSIP

    Beta

    Influencer

    TAP

    Social

    Public

    Managed

    High

    Touch

  • Status review rolls up features and experiences

    back into value props to assess release

    readiness

    Drilldown from value prop shows detailed

    feature status

  • 50 50

    How well are we

    estimating hours?

    And burning down

    the tasks?

    How quickly are

    implementing

    requirements?

    Which impediments

    are still open?

    Are we removing

    impediments in time?

  • 51

    Are we making

    progress on running

    test plans?

    Are build failures

    blocking progress?

    How quickly are we

    fixing bugs?

    How fast is code

    changing?

    Are the tests covering

    the code on builds?

    Do the “fixes” actually

    fix the bugs?

  • 52

    How quickly are we

    fixing bugs and what’s

    our current debt?

    What are our weekly

    find/fix/closure rates?

    How is the debt

    distributed by priority?

    What is still open right

    now?

  • 53

    Are we making

    progress on running

    test plans?

    Are test cases ready to

    run?

    What are the current test

    results for each requirement?

    How much testing is

    manual?

    What are the causes

    of failure?

  • Все счастливые семьи похожи друг на

    друга, каждая несчастливая семья

    несчастлива по-своему.

  • Kegan & Lahey, Harvard Business Review, Nov 2001.

  • © 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.

    The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.