new standard for employer responsiveness
DESCRIPTION
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness. Rachael Fidler HTP. Aims of the New Standard. The 2006 FE Reform White Paper mandated a New Standard that could accredit: Responsiveness to business needs Excellence in delivering vocational training A commitment to continuous improvement - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness
Rachael FidlerHTP
Aims of the New Standard• The 2006 FE Reform White Paper mandated a New
Standard that could accredit:• Responsiveness to business needs• Excellence in delivering vocational training• A commitment to continuous improvement• Accrediting specialisation
• The aim is to bring clarity to the market- 1badge that can be nationally promoted, by bringing together all the other marks.
• Part A is about individual employers and how your organisation relates/interacts with their employers
• Part B is about the SECTOR and groups of employers and the outcomes are about how your specialism affects change in your sector specialism
• Part B is a whole new application
Action for Business
• Initial readiness check & mystery shop findings
• HTPs adopted approach• Highlighted evidence• Identified areas for action• Critical success factors• Concerns
Initial Readiness Check
• Initial WBL trial site• Mystery shop report:
√ Contacts were polite and helpful√ Levels of information, advice and guidance were
good√ Staff appeared very knowledgeable
< Systematic gathering of LMI< A knowledge of WBL terminology was, in some
instances, assumed
Initial Readiness Check
• In 8 areas HTP met over 50% of the indicators, in 3 areas all indicators were fully met
• In the remaining 4 areas less than 50% of indicators were not evidenced at the readiness check
Initial Readiness Check
• Key strengths
– All staff were aware of company’s mission & targeted occupational sectors
– A wide range of LMI is collected at all levels– Employers are engaged in all stages of the delivery
process– Delivery of training assessment is highly flexible– Annual employer surveys are conducted and
inform planning– H&S & EO have a high profile
Initial Readiness Check
Key strengths
– All staff participate in an annual appraisal and CPD is supported
– Training facilities are excellent– All reception staff have undergone appropriate
training– Regular reviews highlight employers not currently
engaged in training and actions are evidenced– The organisation actively seeks and promotes
partnership and networking
Initial Readiness Check
Areas for development
– Some employer data is paper based making market analysis and strategic marketing difficult
– Clearer Service Standards must be set and monitored across the company
– Employer targets must be explicit across all areas of the business
– Marketing plans and budgets require formalising– Dissemination of HTPs pricing policy across all
products requires wider dissemination
HTPs ApproachImprove Employer Engagement
Benchmark against A4B standards
Identification of evidence and gaps
Generate options
Evaluateagainst
objective
Implementation Plan
Implement
Review progress
Key Action Areas• Ensure visibility and dissemination of
the overarching annual planning cycle
• Formalise marketing activity and improve the analysis marketing activity
• Extend commercial development plans to inform long term business strategy
Critical Success Factors
• Systematic gathering of LMI
• Effectively tracking the employer journey
• Ensuring the ethos and culture of employer engagement is embedded and sustained across the organisation
Concerns• Validity and costs of LMI data
• Creating/sourcing and costs of a CRMS
• Ensuring systems are adhered to
The story so far• Asked if we would like to Test the NS• Went through testing• Unofficially told we would have passed
including section 5 due to the marks• Decided to Fast Track• Wrote and submitted application, couldn’t
do Part B
Assessment• 2 assessors • 3 days, 4 centres staff individually and in
groups all levels• Evidence• Employer validation- we prepared our
employers!• Key area section 5, 300 points
Submission• HTP submission for The New Standard was a very
comprehensive and credible document that covered all aspects of their business.
• In presenting the submission HTP provided many examples of both process and specific illustrations of practice.
• Through the document and on the verification visit they were able to substantiate the rigour of their procedures and the extent to which they are embed in the ethos of the business.
Strategy • The relationship with employers is
recognised as the foundation of the business and their ability to maintain their reputation.
Fundamentals• The selection and skill set of employees is good and the
organisational structure creates clear links across the employer journey whilst maintaining a high degree of interaction between teams supported by structured meetings/reviews.
Respond• The TNA approach is well defined and does focus on the
employer and their business needs and then compares this to existing staff skills and abilities. There is evidence of long term TNA planning for their major clients.
• Information systems are well developed in the business providing for issues to be addressed at an early stage and for activities to be undertaken concurrently so speeding up responsiveness and flexibility.
deliver• The delivery activity is integrated into the define/propose
activity to ensure a seamless experience for the employer and the learner and feedback is obtained and acted on at all stages.
Relate• Extensive interaction with employers is evident and
feedback approaches result in an extensive range of data to
inform planning and improvement activity.
Perform• Performance measurement is mapped well across the
indicators of the New Standard and demonstrates a well embedded approach. Feedback measures are in place and provide a ready and direct source of information.
• Outcomes are assessed on a case by case basis with a scoring system incorporated into the review that provided both qualitative and quantitative data for reviews.
Improve• Extensive interaction with employers is evident and
feedback approaches result in an extensive range of data to inform planning and improvement activity.