The power of collective intelligence

next GENER

LABS ATION

RAFFLES DISCOVERY STUDIO

innovation THE RDS FRAMEWORK

GATHERING §  2345 students surveyed

§  44 teachers interviewed

DATA

95% of students found the technologies experimented in class relevant to their subject

95% of students felt more engaged as a result of the technologies used in class

HAD TO SAY ABOUT

what the STUDENTS THE LESSONS

ENGAGING

INTERACTIVE

enjoyable

IMPOSSIBLE not to pay attention

refreshing

HAD TO SAY ABOUT

what the STUDENTS TECHNOLOGY

CLICKER

INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD hand-held ANSWERING DEVICE

HAD TO SAY ABOUT

what the TEACHERS THE LESSONS

INCREASED MOTIVATION to explore new methods of pedagogical designs and deliveries

BETTER UNDERSTANDING of the differentiated learning needs of the class

REDESIGNED CONTENT resulted in higher student engagement

STUDENT COLLABORATION is greatly enhanced and efficiently archived

FULL PARTICIPATION from the students in the class

STUDENT-DIRECTED LEARNING is easier to achieve

NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE in classroom management

CUSTOMISED TRAINING SESSIONS helped with successful delivery of experiments

FINDINGS §  Pedagogical innovation

comes through strong design and content mastery.

KEY

FINDINGS §  There is a need to provide

support to teachers in managing change and innovation

KEY

FINDINGS §  Teachers strong in pedagogy

are more likely to grow more in their TPACK than teachers strong in technology but not in pedagogy or content

KEY

RDS v2

RDS v1

PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATION

TIME INVESTMENT BY TEACHER P

ο

PΔ

Current Classroom Reference Point

Next Gen Lab v1 (NGL)

Pο – Pedagogical Translation for Technology PΔ – Pedagogical Transformation with Technology