nhs airedale, wharfedale and craven ccg pharmacy first ... · review list of conditions and...
TRANSCRIPT
Version 1
NHS Airedale, Wharfedale and Craven
CCG Pharmacy First Self Care Service
Pharmacy First - 10 Month Evaluation 18th September 2014 – 17th July 2015
Anonymised Version
Produced by Dr Rachel Urban, Research and Evaluation Manager, Community Pharmacy West Yorkshire
1
SUMMARY OF EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Pharmacy First was introduced mid-September
2014 within 31 pharmacies which serve
patients within Airedale, Wharfedale and
Craven (AWC) CCG. The service supports
patients to self-care through the provision of
advice, printed information and, where
necessary, supplied medication from a defined
formulary by the pharmacist. All patients
registered with a GP within AWC can be
signposted to Pharmacy First. The Pharmacy
First service is only available to those exempt
from prescription charges, to whom
medication is supplied free of charge. Patients
attending the pharmacy who are not exempt
from prescription charges can access free
advice under the community pharmacy
essential service - self-care and can be offered
the purchase of a medicine. The cost of all
medicines for conditions included within
Pharmacy First is less than the current
prescription charge.
Overall, in the first ten months, Pharmacy First has shown to be a cost-effective way to manage patients
presenting with minor ailments. A number of consultations for minor ailments were delivered through
this service with the estimated release of approximately 117 hours GP time across 16 practices, improving
GP access. Most of the patients were under 10 years old with over half of those being under 5 years. The
majority of patients were treated for self-limiting viral symptoms such as cough, cold, sore throat and
fever and were provided with symptomatic relief for their symptoms. The cost for medication was low
(per patient £1.92 and per item £1.54). Including the service fee of £4.50 this equates to an average
consultation cost per patient of £6.42 (exc VAT). This is lower than several other schemes which have
previously been evaluated, most likely due to the differences in both service fees and formulary.
The feedback from patients was positive with most patients indicating that they would be willing to re-
use the service and would recommend it to others. The variation of number of patients consulting the
self-care service per pharmacy and practice is positively skewed, with the majority of patients visiting a
small number of pharmacies and being from a small number of practices. It is unclear whether this is due
to pharmacy or GP practice promotion of the service in these areas, whether these practices have a higher
rate of minor ailment consultations or some other reason for example levels of high deprivation.
2
A number of further actions could be taken improve the success of the service. These are outlined in the
summary of recommendations below.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Determine potential reason in the variation of uptake through discussion with pharmacy and GP
practice staff and analysis of minor ailment consultation rates in GP practices pre and post-
implementation.
Consider further ways to increase promotion of the service amongst staff and patients to ensure
appropriate use and referral
Consider joint GP CP meetings to improve understanding of service between providers and
improve understanding, engagement, referral rates and use plus explore the perceived barriers
eg amount of paperwork
Work with GP practices to ensure that Pharmacy First is embedded into their triage systems and patient pathways
Review other reasons why the uptake is less than that of other areas eg mapping to social
deprivation
Conduct GP read code analysis to determine whether Pharmacy First is being reused by the same
patients
Continue to work with NHS111 to ensure Pharmacy First is an integral part of the urgent care
provision in the CCG area.
Review list of conditions and formulary with the Pharmacy First project group and devise a further
business case to expand the service to include further conditions such as head lice, diarrhoea and
vomiting, mild eczema, heartburn/indigestion and constipation.
Remind pharmacies of the requirement to provide written information in accordance with the
service specification where appropriate
Promote increased recording of patient access to Pharmacy First on GP electronic health record.
3
1 INTRODUCTION
Pharmacy Self-Care Schemes or Minor Ailment Schemes (MASs) are commissioned locally to promote self-
care through a consultation with the pharmacist.1,2,3 They have the opportunity to provide treatment and
symptomatic relief, where appropriate, using a defined formulary for self-limiting and easily treatable
conditions that do not require medical intervention. Approximately 30% of consultations within general
practice are for minor ailments of which approximately 60% can be treated by a community pharmacist.1
A systematic review published in 2013 has shown that MASs provide a suitable alternative to GP
consultation and decrease re-consultation rates in GP practices, with most patients reporting complete
resolution of symptoms.2 This leads to a decrease in GP prescribing costs and the number of consultations
for minor ailments.2
In September 2014, Pharmacy First was commissioned by AWC CCG, following the success of Pharmacy
First in Bradford City CCG.3 It provides the CCG population with rapid access to a pharmacist for self-care
advice and, where necessary, medication from a defined formulary for a range of minor ailments. The
ultimate aim is to provide a more appropriate alternative to the use of general practice or other health
care providers (e.g. A&E, Out of Hours Urgent Care) for minor ailments, potentially releasing capacity
within general practice through the provision of a more cost-effective service. The service is aimed at
patients who use GP or Out of Hours services when they have a minor ailment rather than self-care or
purchasing medicines over-the-counter (OTC). It is hoped that this service will change patient behaviours,
educating and assisting patients in how to access self-care and the appropriate use of healthcare services.
The service supports patients to self-care through the provision of advice, printed information and, where
necessary, supplied medication from a defined formulary by the pharmacist. All patients registered with
a GP within AWC can be signposted to Pharmacy First. The Pharmacy First service is only available to
those exempt from prescription charges, to whom medication is supplied free of charge. Patients
attending the pharmacy who are not exempt from prescription charges can access free advice under the
community pharmacy essential service - self-care and can be offered the purchase of a medicine. The
cost of all medicines for conditions included within Pharmacy First is less than the current prescription
charge (see service specification and service guide for further details accessed at www.cpwy.org ).
2 SERVICE
Pharmacy First was introduced mid-September 2015 within 31 pharmacies which serve patients within
AWC. The presenting patient must currently be registered with a GP within AWC CCG and be suffering
from an ailment which is included in the service. The following conditions can be managed within the
Pharmacy First service:
Cough
Cold
Earache
Sore throat
Threadworms
Teething
Athletes foot
Thrush
Hay fever
Fever
Sprains and strains
Blocked nose
Version 1
These conditions can be treated using medication listed in the Pharmacy First formulary (see table 1):
Table 1 Pharmacy First Formulary
Formulary
Beclometasone 50 mcg nasal spray (200 sprays)
Cetirizine solution 5mg/5ml (200ml) SF
Cetrizine 10mg tablets (30)
Chlorphenamine Syrup (150 ml) SF
Chlorphenamine Tablets 4 mg (30)
Clotrimazole 500mg pessary (1)
Clotrimazole cream 1% (20g)
Ephedrine 0.5% nasal drops (10ml)
Fluconazole 150 mg Cap (1)
Ibuprofen suspension 100mg/5ml (100ml) SF
Ibuprofen tablets 200mg (24)
Ibuprofen tablets 400mg (24)
Lidocaine alone or with Cetalkonium /Cetylpyridiniumteething gel (10/15g)
Loratadine syrup 5mg/5ml (100ml)
Loratadine 10mg tablets (30)
Mebendazole suspension (30ml)
Mebendazole 100mg tablet (1)
Mebendazole 100mg tablet (4)
Miconazole 2% cream (30g)
Paracetamol 500 mg Tablets (32)
Paracetamol soluble tabs 500mg (24)
ParacetamolSusp SF 120 mg / 5 ml (100ml) SF
ParacetamolSusp SF 250 mg / 5 ml (100ml) SF
Sodium chloride 0.9% nasal drops (10ml)
Pharmacists can supply any brand of product as long as the active ingredients are the same and pack size is at least
the size specified above (i.e. larger packs can be supplied). The products supplied must not be POM packs and
each product must be supplied with a corresponding Patient Information Leaflet.
The formulary products can be used for any of their licensed indications at licensed doses and therefore
pharmacists can also treat: self-limiting pain, fungal infections (Ringworm, Candida interigo) and headache (this
list not exhaustive) if an eligible patient present with these symptoms or conditions.
The pharmacist assesses the patient’s condition using a structured approach to responding to symptoms (see
table 2), then provides information and where appropriate medication according to the formulary (see table 1).
The Airedale, Wharfedale & Craven Pharmacy First service does not include any cough preparations within their
formulary. The rationale being there is no good evidence from trials that cough medicines are effective or reduce
the severity / length of a cough. Cough medicines are considered to be drugs of limited clinical value and GPs are
encouraged not to prescribe them. Additionally the MHRA has stated that cough medicines containing
5
antihistamines, cough suppressants, expectorants, or decongestants should be avoided in children under 6.
Patients presenting with a cough are managed by the provision of information (oral and printed) regarding the
management of coughs.
Table 2 Summary of assessment and provision of advice
Assessment Provision of advice
The pharmacist identifies:
Nature and duration of symptoms
Concurrent medication and medical conditions
Exclusion of any serious disease / alarm / red flag symptoms
If the patient is pregnant/ breastfeeding
If any medication has already been supplied / taken for the ailment Symptoms
The pharmacist provides advice on:
Expected symptoms
What is normal
Probable duration of symptoms
Self-care messages: What patients can do for themselves to help manage the ailment
Where (and when) to go for further advice / treatment if necessary e.g. If the cough lasts for more than 3 weeks visit your GP
Antibiotic stewardship message
Data from each consultation is recorded on PharmOutcomes® (a data capture system which pharmacy use to
claim for service provision).
3 METHOD OF EVALUATION
All data inputted on to PharmOutcomes was evaluated from 18th September 2014 – 17th July 2015. This included
patient feedback questions asked at the end of each Pharmacy First consultation. Data was extracted into Excel
and reported using descriptive statistics. Questionnaires were devised to gain opinions from GP practice staff
and pharmacy staff. The GP questionnaire was distributed via SurveyMonkey® (to GPs, Practice Nurses and
Practice Managers) and the pharmacy staff questionnaire using both paper-based questionnaires and
SurveyMonkey®.
6
4 RESULTS
Overview
Over the ten month evaluation period 31 community pharmacies, conducted a total of 874 consultations. The
range of consultations per pharmacy varied from one to 164 with a mean of 28 consultations per pharmacy and
a median of 12 consultations per pharmacy. The top 5 pharmacies delivered just over half of all consultations
(52.6% - 460/874), with the pharmacy who delivered the most consultations delivering almost double that of the
second highest pharmacy (see figure 1). Of the 874 consultations 509 (58.2%) were delivered in a private
consultation room, the rest in a private area of the pharmacy (365/874 – 41.8%).
Figure 1 Percentage of consultations delivered per pharmacy
Patient Demographics
Of the 874 patients seen 476 (54.5%) were female and 398 (45.5%) male. Just over 50% (53.0% - 463/874) of the
patients seen were under 10 years old (see figure 2), with the majority of those being under 5 years old (31.6%,
277/874). Thus, the majority were exempt from prescription charges due to being under 16 (see figure 3). The
majority of patients described themselves as White - British (57.7% - 504/874). With the next highest ethnic
category being Asian or Asian British – Pakistani (32.6% - 285/874) (see figure 4). Thirty-seven per cent (321/874)
of patients accessing the service lived within BD21, with a large number from BD20 (31.1% - 272/874) and BD22
(19.3% - 169/874) also using the service (see figure 5).
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Co
nsu
ltat
ion
s
Pharmacy
7
Figure 2 Age of patients using Pharmacy First
Figure 3 Exemption status of patients using Pharmacy First
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
A -
un
der
16
yea
rs o
f ag
e
B -
16
, 17
or
18
in f
ull-
tim
e e
du
cati
on
C -
60
yea
rs o
f ag
e o
r o
ver
D -
has
val
id m
ate
rnit
y e
xem
pti
on
cert
ific
ate
E -
has
val
id m
edic
al e
xem
pti
on
cert
ific
ate
F -
has
val
id p
resc
rip
tio
n p
re-
pay
me
nt
cert
ific
ate
H -
get
s In
com
e Su
pp
ort
or
inco
me
rela
ted
ESA
K -
get
s in
com
e b
ased
Jo
bse
eke
rsA
llow
ance
L -
is n
ame
d o
n c
urr
en
t H
C2
ch
arge
sce
rtif
icat
e
M -
is e
nti
tled
or
nam
ed o
n v
alid
NH
STa
x C
red
it E
xem
pti
on
Ce
rtif
icat
e
S -
has
a p
artn
er w
ho
ge
ts P
ensi
on
Cre
dit
gu
aran
tee
cred
it
Pat
ien
ts
Exemption Status
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99
Pat
ien
ts
Age
8
Figure 4 Ethnicity of Patients using Pharmacy First
Figure 5 Post code area of patients using Pharmacy First
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Wh
ite
- B
riti
sh
Asi
an o
r A
sian
Bri
tish
- P
akis
tan
i
Asi
an o
r A
sian
Bri
tish
-B
angl
ades
hi
Wh
ite
- O
ther
Pre
fer
no
t to
say
Mix
ed -
Wh
ite
and
Bla
ck A
fric
an
No
t st
ated
Bla
ck o
r B
lack
Bri
tish
- A
fric
an
Mix
ed -
Wh
ite
and
Asi
an
Asi
an o
r A
sian
Bri
tish
- In
dia
n
Mix
ed -
Wh
ite
and
Bla
ckC
arib
bea
n
An
y o
ther
eth
nic
gro
up
Wh
ite
- G
ypsy
or
Iris
h T
rave
ller
Asi
an o
r A
sian
Bri
tish
- C
hin
ese
Asi
an o
r A
sian
Bri
tish
- O
ther
Asi
an B
ackg
rou
nd
Bla
ck o
r B
lack
Bri
tish
- O
the
rB
lack
Bac
kgro
un
d
Pat
ien
ts
Ethnicity
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
BD21 BD20 BD22 LS29 BD23 BD16 BD24
Pat
ien
ts
Postcode
9
Practices
The patients using the service were registered at 16 practices, however 81.6% of consultations within the service
came from 7 practices (see figure 6). The mean number of patient visits per GP practice was 54.6 visits and the
median 51 visits (range 1-186 visits). The range per 1000 practice population was 27.6 - 0.2 consultations with
mean 5.4 consultations and median 4.4 consultations (see figure 7).
Figure 6 Registered practice of patients using Pharmacy First
Figure 7 Number of patient consultations per 1000 practice population
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
Co
nsu
ltat
ion
s
GP Practice
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
B K C J L P F I O G H D M A E N
Nu
mb
er o
f co
nsu
ltat
ion
s p
er 1
00
0 p
ract
ice
po
pu
lati
on
GP practice
10
The Consultation
Figure 8 Distribution of patient consultations throughout day Monday to Sunday
The peak time of day for consultations was 4pm, with 86 consultations (9.8%) being on a Saturday or Sunday and
87 (10.0%) consultations being out of hours on a weekday (before 8am or after 6pm); total 19.8% (173/874) out
of hours (see figure 8).
Patients presented at the pharmacy with a total of 37 different symptoms. 116 (13.3%) patients presented with
two different presenting complaints. The majority of patients presented at the pharmacy for symptomatic relief
of viral symptoms e.g. runny nose and sore throat with or without a cough or a fever. Ninety-one per cent
(792/874) patients were treated in the pharmacy and did not require any onward referral to other services. Only
17 (1.9%) patients were referred urgently to either the GP or NHS 111, one patient was referred to the dentist.
The remainder were referred to the GP for non-urgent appointments (7.3%, 64/874).
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Co
nsu
ltat
ion
s
Hour of Day
11
Figure 9 Presenting Symptoms treated as part of Pharmacy First
Supply of Medication
A total of 1092 medications were supplied to patients. At least one medicine was supplied in 92.6% (809/874)
consultations to either treat or provide symptomatic relief of their symptoms. The range of medicines supplied
varied from 0 to 3 medicines with most people receiving one medicine (62.4%, 545/874) (see figure 10). Most
commonly patients were supplied with an analgesic/antipyretic (see figure 11). The cost per patient was £1.92
(£2.31 inc VAT) and cost per item was £1.54 (£1.85 inc VAT). Including the service fee of £4.50 this equates to
an average consultation cost per patient of £6.42 (£6.81 inc VAT). The total cost of the service (consultation fee
+ cost of medication) for the first ten months was £5492.41 (£5828.59 inc VAT) (assuming all consultations were
claimed).
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
Feve
r w
ith
ou
t vi
ral s
ymp
tom
s
Vir
al S
ymp
tom
s w
ith
Co
ugh
Vag
inal
Th
rush
Hay
fe
ver
Vir
al S
ymp
tom
s w
ith
ou
t C
ou
gh
Thre
adw
orm
s
Eara
che
Sore
Th
roat
On
ly
Hea
dac
he
/Mig
rain
e
Pai
n-
Oth
er
Alle
rgy
sym
pto
ms-
ski
n
Teet
hin
g
Fun
gal s
kin
infe
ctio
ns
Ras
h/d
erm
atit
is (
no
t al
lerg
ic/
fun
gal)
Pai
n-
Mu
scu
losk
ele
tal
Pai
n-
Bac
k p
ain
Pai
n-
De
nta
l
Co
ugh
On
ly
Infe
ctio
n
Ch
icke
n P
ox
Eye
Oth
er
sto
mac
h
Ton
silli
tis
Alle
rgy
sym
pto
ms
Po
st-v
acci
nat
ion
sym
pto
ms
Pai
n -
no
t sp
ecif
ied
Co
nge
stio
n b
lock
ed n
ose
Co
ld S
ore
Bit
e
Ora
l Th
rush
War
t
Thru
sh (
mal
e)
UTI
Mo
uth
Ulc
ers
Pat
ien
ts
Presenting Complaint
12
Figure 10 Number of medicines supplied per patient
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
No medicines One medicine Two Medicines Three Medicines
Pat
ien
ts
Number of Medicines
13
Figure 11 Medication provided to the patient following consultation
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Par
ace
tam
ol S
usp
SF
12
0 m
g /
5 m
l (1
00
ml)
SF
Ibu
pro
fen
su
spen
sio
n 1
00
mg/
5m
l (1
00
ml)
SF
Par
ace
tam
ol 5
00
mg
Tab
lets
(3
2)
Clo
trim
azo
le c
ream
1%
(2
0g)
Par
ace
tam
olS
usp
SF
25
0 m
g /
5 m
l (1
00
ml)
SF
Clo
trim
azo
le 5
00
mg
pe
ssar
y (1
)
Ibu
pro
fen
tab
lets
40
0m
g (2
4)
Ch
lorp
he
nam
ine
Syr
up
(1
50
ml)
SF
Par
ace
tam
ol S
usp
SF
25
0 m
g /
5 m
l (1
00
ml)
SF
Mic
on
azo
le 2
% c
ream
(3
0g)
Lid
oca
ine
alo
ne
or
wit
h C
etal
kon
ium
/C
etyl
pyr
idin
ium
teet
hin
g ge
l (1
0/1
5g)
Meb
end
azo
le s
usp
ensi
on
(3
0m
l)
Lora
tad
ine
10
mg
tab
lets
(3
0)
Meb
end
azo
le 1
00
mg
tab
let
(4)
Cet
iriz
ine
10
mg
tab
lets
(3
0)
Flu
con
azo
le 1
50
mg
Cap
(1
)
Ibu
pro
fen
tab
lets
20
0m
g (2
4)
Sod
ium
ch
lori
de
0.9
% n
asal
dro
ps
(10
ml)
Par
ace
tam
ol s
olu
ble
tab
s 5
00
mg
(24
)
Cet
iriz
ine
so
luti
on
5m
g/5
ml (
20
0m
l) S
F
Meb
end
azo
le 1
00
mg
tab
let
(1)
Par
ace
tam
olS
usp
SF
25
0 m
g /
5 m
l (1
00
ml)
Lora
tad
ine
syr
up
5m
g/5
ml (
10
0m
l)
Ch
lorp
he
nam
ine
Tab
lets
4 m
g (3
0)
Eph
ed
rin
e 0
.5%
nas
al d
rop
s (1
0m
l)
Bec
lom
etas
on
e 5
0 m
cg n
asal
sp
ray
(20
0 s
pra
ys)
Cet
rizi
ne
10
mg
tab
lets
(3
0)
Ch
lorp
he
nam
ine
Syr
up
(1
50
ml)
Pat
ien
ts
Medication
14
Figure 12 Leaflet provided to patient during consultation
All patients were provided with verbal advice during the consultation. This varied depending on the patient’s
presenting complaint/symptoms. The majority of patients were provided with written information from
patient.co.uk (see figure 12). One Hundred and seventy patients received get better without antibiotics
information (19.5%) and 41 patients received a leaflet on managing cough (4.7%) despite 13.6% (119/874)
patients having cough recorded as their presenting complaint.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Pri
nte
d in
form
atio
n n
ot
app
rop
riat
e /
su
itab
le f
or
pat
ien
t
Pat
ien
t.co
.uk
Hea
lth
info
rmat
ion
leaf
let
Self
Car
e Fo
rum
Fac
tsh
eet
NH
S C
ho
ice
s In
form
atio
nP
resc
rip
tio
n
PIL
Ver
bal
Ad
vice
Pat
ien
ts
Printed Information Provided
15
Patient Experience Captured on PharmOutcomes®
Figure 13 Action the patient would have taken if Pharmacy First was not available
The majority of patients (80.7%, 705/874) stated they would have used the GP had they not accessed the service
(see figure 13). Using this information and assuming the average GP consultation is 10 minutes4 this has released
705 x 10 = 7050 minutes = 117 hours 30 minutes practice time across AWC (see table 3). The mean time released
per practice was 7 hours 21 minutes, with a median of 5 hours 40 minutes. Using a fee of £575 for A&E
attendance the overall savings from the service for the first eight months is £627.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Go
ne
to
GP
Bo
ugh
t p
rod
uct
Cal
led
NH
S 1
11
Do
ne
no
thin
g
Go
ne
to
Acc
iden
t an
d E
mer
gen
cy
Co
nta
cted
Ou
t-O
f-H
ou
rs G
P
Pat
ien
t d
id n
ot
answ
er
qu
est
ion
Go
ne
to
den
tist
Pat
ien
ts
Action taken
16
Table 3 Number of hours released per practice
GP Practice Hours Min
One Medicare @ North Street, 151 North Street, Keighley, Bradford BD21 3AU (B83602) 28 30
Farfield Group Practice, St.Andrews Surgeries, West Lane,Keighley, West Yorkshire BD21 2LD (B83021) 17 0
Crosshills Group Practice, Crosshills Health Centre, Holme Lane, Crosshills, Keighley, West Yorkshire BD20 7LG (B82020) 16 0
Ling House Medical Centre, 49 Scott Street, Keighley, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD21 2JH (B83008) 12 50
Haworth Medical Practice, Heathcliffe Mews, Haworth, Keighley BD22 8DH (B83027) 9 10
Silsden Group Practice, Silsden Health Centre, Elliott Street, Silsden, Keighley, West Yorkshire BD20 0DG (B83006) 8 0
Kilmeny Surgery, 50 Ashbourne Road,Ingrow, Keighley, West Yorkshire BD21 1LA (B83033) 7 20
Springs Medical Centre, Ilkley Moor Doctors Group, Springs Medical Centre, Springs Lane, Ilkley LS29 8TH (B83624) 5 40
Holycroft Surgery, The Health Centre, Oakworth Road, Keighley BD21 1SA (B83023) 5 40
Fisher Medical Centre, Millfields, Coach St, Skipton, North Yorkshire BD23 1EU (B82028) 3 50
Dyneley House Surgery, Newmarket Street, Skipton, North Yorkshire BD23 2HZ (B82053) 1 20
Grange Park Surgery, Grange Road, Burley-In-Wharfedale, Ilkley LS29 7HG (B83019) 1 0
Townhead Surgery, Townhead Surgeries, Settle, North Yorkshire BD24 9JA (B82007) 30
Oakworth Medical Practice, 3 Lidget Mill, Oakworth, Keighley BD22 7HN (B83061) 20
Grassington Medical Centre, 9 Station Road, Grassington, North Yorkshire BD23 5LS (B82099) 10
Ilkley & Wharfedale Medical Practice, Ilkley & Wharfedale Practice, Springs Lane, Ilkley LS29 8TQ (B83002) 10
Total 117 30
17
Figure 14 How the patient found out about the service
Most patients were informed about the service by their GP practice (42.4%, 371/874). Over 95% of patients
(96.1%, 840/874) stated that they would recommend the service to a friend, the remainder either did not
respond (2.3%, 20/874), were not sure (1.5%, 13/874). Only one out of 874 said they would not recommend the
service (0.1%).
Most patients felt that Pharmacy First had increased their confidence to self-care without seeing a doctor (93.2%,
815/874), with 95.4% (834/874) saying that they would use the Pharmacy First next time they needed advice.
Three patients (0.3%) did not feel more confident to self-care, 5 (0.5%) did not know whether they felt more
confident or were unsure (18 (2.1%) patients did not respond). Five patients (0.6%) felt they would not use
Pharmacy First in future, 22 (2.5%) were unsure and one (0.1%) did not know. The remainder did not respond
(1.3, 12/874).
The overall patient outcomes are summarised in figure 16.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Info
rmed
by
GP
su
rger
y
Info
rmed
by
ph
arm
acy
Use
d b
efo
re
Wo
rd o
f m
ou
th
Info
rmed
by
NH
S 1
11
Po
ster
Pat
ien
t d
id n
ot
answ
er
qu
est
ion
Med
ia /
Soci
al m
edia
/ o
nlin
e
Wo
rk
Pat
ien
ts
Method
18
Figure 16 Overall patient outcome
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Advice and medicationsupply
Non-urgent referralwith advice
Advice only Non-urgent referralwith advice and
medication
Urgent referral
Co
nsu
ltat
ion
s
Outcome
19
GP Practice Staff Opinion
A total of 13 GP practice staff responded to the questionnaire. Not every respondent answered each question
which accounts for the difference in denominators. Six respondents suggested that there should be additional
conditions included in Pharmacy First (see table 4). Seven also suggested further medications to be included in
the formulary (see table 5). Most practice staff (9/12) felt they were well informed about the service before it
started. Leaflets and posters were specifically mentioned plus information from the practice pharmacist in one
instance. In contrast, one person added:
‘We were given info for display but not explained to how the actual service would work in pharmacies
regarding medications’
And another:
‘[we had] lack of Promotional Patient Posters compared to Bradford CCG. Nil in Local Papers’
Table 4 Conditions to add to Pharmacy First suggested by GP Practice Staff
Condition Number of respondents
Eye Problems 4
Diarrhoea 1
Emergency Contraception 1
Otitis externa 1
UTI 1
Oral Contraception 1
Table 5 Medications to add to the Pharmacy First formulary suggested by GP Practice Staff
Medication Number of respondents
Chloramphenicol eye drops/ eye ointment 4
Gaviscon 1
Lactulose 1
Loperamide 1
Fucithalmic eye ointment 1
Otomise/Sofradex 1
Nitrofurantoin for UTI 1
Oral contraception 1
Eleven respondents stated that they had promoted the service within the GP practice, one was unsure.
Promotion was conducted through the display of posters, leaflets, messages on display screens, reception staff
advice, and doctor triaging. Nine members of GP staff felt that there was more that could be done to promote
the service. This included increased local media and advertising, for example, TV adverts, promotion in
community centres and mosques, informing schools and playgroups and bigger posters. Two GP practices
20
highlighted lack of clarity amongst their staff of which ailments were included in the service. Another member
of staff felt the service was ‘too complex for patients to understand’. With another adding:
‘[There is] lots of confusion amongst patients about what they can expect from PF. Many different
schemes across the country all doing different things so patients get confused about what is covered
and what isn't.’
Only four members of staff reported that their practice routinely recorded that the patient had used Pharmacy
First on the practice electronic health record. Six specified that they did not, the remainder did not respond.
None of the respondents expanded on their answer.
Only two members of staff felt that Pharmacy First had decreased the number of patients attending the GP
practice; one felt it had increased. A couple of staff added that they felt the patients did not trust the
pharmacist as much as the GP. Others found it difficult to tell whether there had been a change in numbers as
their numbers of consultations for minor ailments were so high.
‘We actively promote PF so this must have made a difference but demand is so high that is it hard to quantify.’
Only 2 members of practice staff felt that Pharmacy First had had a positive influence on relationships between them and the pharmacy, one didn’t know and another felt that they only ‘tend to receive feedback when it is negative’.
Overall, despite some negative comments, Pharmacy First was deemed a worthwhile service by most GP
practice staff (8/11) . The main reason provided was the reduction in patients needing to see the GP, increasing
capacity. It was felt that this would increase the more people used it and would be helped with further
promotion. The comments are summarised in Table 6.
Table 6 GP practice staff comments on overall value of the service
If patients knew how it worked
Patients can get advise straightaway and the problem actioned
If all pharmacies are involved and their remit is extended
As it stands , it is not making the impact it could
Prevents appointments for minor self-managed illnesses
Fantastic scheme if everyone was on board and giving out a unified message to patients.
In my practice's experience this does not provide a worthwhile service. Pharmacists often send the patients back to the GP - to take back the workload. Perhaps if it was better advertised and more treatments could be issued then it may work. Conjunctivitis is a common minor illness that pharmacists can manage so why has this been left off the list?
Very, keep banging on about it & someone may take notice
In theory but doesn’t seem to have impacted on patients behaviour. Hasn't reduced our workload.
But it could be if it were worthwhile and efficient
Very low uptake from our patients. Takes longer for them to fill in a form with the pharmacist than speak over the telephone and get a prescription
Yes - why don't you look at making some real impact and savings instead of fluffing about around the edges?
21
Respondents provided various comments on what was liked about the service. These included the ease and
quickness of the service with lack of waiting times. One commented that Pharmacy First had
‘Taken off some demand from General Practice. Given staff an option to give to the patient instead of
having to squeeze an appointment in or give an urgent appointment for a minor ailment.’
Practice staff felt that the service could be improved through increased education, promotion and advertising
of the service of the service and expanding the number of conditions which can be treated. Suggestions
included:
‘Having dedicated clinics in pharmacy so patients know they can get health advice between certain hours instead of being signposted by the practice.’
and
‘[A reduction in] bureaucracy - pharmacists avoid it because it require such a lot of paperwork. Be clearer about what it includes and WHEN - i.e at what age’
Pharmacist Opinion
Twenty-two members of pharmacy staff completed the feedback survey. Thirteen suggested further
medications which should be included within Pharmacy First (see table 7).
Table 7 Medications to add to the Pharmacy First Formulary suggested by Pharmacy Staff
Medication Number of Respondents
Chloramphenicol eye drops/ eye ointment 9
Head lice treatment 4
Aciclovir cream 3
Hydrocortisone cream 3
Indigestion remedies 3
Cough Preparations 3
Constipation remedies/ Lactulose 2
NSAID gel 2
Bonjela adult and child 1
Benzydamine oral spray 1
Miconazole oral gel 1
Sodium Bicarbonate ear drops 1
Miconazole HC 1
Throat lozenges 1
Loperamide 1
Miconazole oral gel 1
Beclomethasone nasal spray 1
Co-codamol 8/500 tablets 1
Emollient 1
Cystitis treatment 1
Diarrhea treatment 1
22
Figure 17 Resources found useful by pharmacy staff
The majority of respondents felt that NHS choices, patient.co.uk and the “Pharmacy First Cough leaflet” were
most useful (see figure 17). Most respondents (20/22) did not seek out further resources for the service as they
felt that there were enough supplied, however one used the product patient information leaflets and another
made an A3 poster to display outside the pharmacy.
They also felt the service was straight forward and easy to carry out: ‘it is quite simple to follow and effective’
However, there was agreement that the service would be easier to deliver if there was increased promotion,
less paperwork, better understanding and communication with GP practices and more medication available.
Others suggested that better knowledge of the service by the whole pharmacy team would improve delivery
when the usual pharmacist was not working. It was suggested by one contractor that there was a
‘perception by patients that it is easy a way to access 'free medicines' Some contractors simply tick boxing and giving medication out.’
One individual thought that ‘The fact that we were asked not to really push the service too much’ had contributed to the low uptake.
The staff suggested that the service would be easier to conduct if the formulary was extended, the form filling
decreased, pharmacy support staff were able to provide the service and GP staff were better informed of the
service to be able to explain it better to patients, referring more appropriately.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
NH
S C
ho
ice
s
Pat
ien
t.co
.uk
Hea
lth
info
rmat
ion
leaf
lets
Ph
arm
acy
Firs
t C
on
sult
atio
n R
eco
rdfo
rm
Ph
arm
acy
Firs
t C
ou
gh L
eafl
et
Ph
arm
acy
Firs
t G
et
bet
ter
wit
ho
ut
anti
bio
tics
leaf
let
Self
Car
e Fo
rum
Fac
tsh
eets
Ph
arm
acy
Firs
t G
et
bet
ter
wit
ho
ut
anti
bio
tics
leaf
let
(eas
y re
ad v
ersi
on
)
Po
ster
s
Ph
arm
acy
Firs
t co
ugh
leaf
let
(eas
yre
ad v
ersi
on
)
Trea
t Yo
urs
elf
Be
tter
Web
site
List
of
AW
C G
P p
ract
ices
Ph
arm
acy
Firs
t
Serv
ice
Gu
ide
Cre
dit
Car
ds
Wh
en s
ho
uld
I w
orr
y?
Serv
ice
Spec
ific
atio
n
NH
S C
ho
ice
s In
form
atio
nP
resc
rip
tio
n
Win
do
w S
tick
ers
Self
Car
e Fo
rum
Ph
arm
acy
Staf
f
REsource
23
Nearly all respondents (20/21) felt the information received prior to starting the service prepared them
sufficiently to conduct the service adding that the training was informative and well-explained allowing the
service to be initiated easily. One pharmacy added:
‘Absolutely brilliant induction to the service. Cannot fault the delivery in any way. Well done!’
In contrast another member of pharmacy staff stated:
‘We had not received any information around this service. Staff are not aware that they should offer this service.’
Figure 18 Helpfulness of Support received from CPWY
The majority of respondents felt that the support received from Community Pharmacy West Yorkshire was
helpful, specifically the training evening and service guide (see figure 18).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Very Helpful Helpful Not Sure Unhelpful Very Unhelpful
Nu
mb
er o
f P
har
mac
y St
aff
Level of Helpfulness
24
Figure 19 Ease of completing PharmOutcomes®
PharmOutcomes® was thought to be easy and straight forward to use in the majority of cases (see figure 19).
‘All the input data was in the same format as the written sheet so it was easy to deal with the patient and then enter the data later.’
One member of staff had tried to enter the data directly on to PharmOutcomes® during a consultation, but had
found this difficult another had had difficulties logging on to the system initially but had subsequently resolved
these issues.
Half (10/20) of the respondents felt that Pharmacy First had improved relationships with their GP practice.
Two felt they already had a good relationship. A number also reported that despite the relationship being
improved there were still some issues with inappropriate referrals due to GP practice staff not understanding
the limitations of the service. One person felt that the doctor sometimes undermined the pharmacist for cough
consultations and that the referral process could be improved.
Pharmacy staff felt that their relationship with the patients had improved (12/20) with the patient putting more trust and confidence in the pharmacist. Several felt that the patient was more likely to visit the pharmacy for advice and medication before going to the GP surgery:
‘The scheme has reinforced the view by many patients that it is good to ask their pharmacist before visiting their surgery as this may avoid having to see a Dr altogether or confirm that they do need to see a Dr and they will not be wasting their time.’
‘They struggle to see GP's so is useful to visit pharmacist first where they can get advice and now medicines if needed’
‘Patients find it a lot easier to treat minor condition from pharmacy than waiting for two weeks to see the GP.’
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Very Easy Fairly Easy Unsure Fairly Difficult Very Difficult
Per
cen
tage
Ph
arm
acis
ts
Ease of Use
25
‘Patients ‘love being able to access pharmacy as opposed to GP - great for out of hours’
Overall, pharmacy staff felt that Pharmacy First worked well especially the accessibility, increased patient
interaction and the claim process. They also felt the service could be improved further through better
understanding and promotion to patients by GP practice staff, especially amongst reception staff. This would
increase referrals and the appropriateness of referrals. Most felt access would also be increased through
increasing the formulary and increased advertising. Other suggestions included GPs notifying patients that
they could have seen a pharmacist for their ailment during a GP consultation, better referral through NHS111,
recorded messages on GP answering services and repeat counterfoils and allowing the pharmacists to promote
more to patients.
‘I think receptionist training in GP practices is the most important improvement that could be made
because their impact as the face of the surgery is key to referrals and saving Dr's time. Also, the 111 service
are still making inappropriate referrals to Pharmacies with the minor ailment scheme and causing a lot of
damage to the reputation of the scheme. Including telling patients they can get prescription only medicines
and then when the patient rings 111 back to say they can't, 111 sends them to another pharmacy on the
minor ailment list where they still can't get prescription only medicine. Expanding the list of minor ailments
that can be treatment within the pharmacy e.g. conjunctivitis’
5 DISCUSSION
Over the first ten months, a number of consultations for minor ailments were delivered through this pharmacy service with the estimated release of approximately 117 hours GP time. The number of consultations and amount of time released is not as large as demonstrated in other schemes. The exact reason for this is unclear. It could be attributable to differences in population and eligibility for the scheme or lack of awareness by patients and practice staff as indicated by questionnaire respondents. Some practice staff felt they had noticed a difference in demand for appointments for common ailments. Joint GP staff and community pharmacy staff meetings may help to improve understanding of the service between providers and improve understanding, engagement, referral rates and use. Further work to compare uptake within different areas according to demographics may be useful, for example weighting for population size and social deprivation.
Most of the patients were under 10 years old with over half of those being under 5 years. The majority of patients were treated for self-limiting viral symptoms such as cough, cold, sore throat and fever and were provided with symptomatic relief for their symptoms. The top formulary items supplied were similar to those provided within the Scottish minor ailment scheme and the Bradford City service, although in Scotland they also provided number of emollients and head lice treatments not available within this service.3,6
Positively, approximately one in five patients used the service in the out of hours period, when their usual GP would be closed. This may reduce demand on out of hours services and allow patients to attend at a more convenient time, especially where patients are unable to attend during working hours. The volume of printed information distributed to patients as part of the scheme was low considering it is an essential aspect. Reiteration of the importance of dissemination of printed information is needed.
The cost for medication was low (per patient £1.92 and per item £1.54 exc VAT). This is lower than medicines in
the Scotland MAS6 and other schemes reported in the recent systematic review.2 Including the service fee of
26
£4.50 this equates to an average consultation cost per patient of £6.42. This is also lower than several other
schemes which have previously been evaluated and all of which were published more than 5 years ago.2 This
variation is most likely due to the differences in both service fees and formulary.
The variation of number of patients consulting Pharmacy First per pharmacy and practice is positively skewed,
with the majority of patients visiting a small number of pharmacies and being from a small number of practices.
It is unclear whether this is due to pharmacy or GP practice promotion of the service in these areas, whether
these practices have a higher rate of minor ailment consultations or some other reason such as level of
deprivation. It would be useful to analyse GP read codes to determine whether the same patients are reusing
the service. This relies on the GP practices routinely recording this information. It would also be useful to weight
the number of consultations per practice using a measure of deprivation to compare practice uptake to see if
this has influenced numbers.
Feedback from GP practice staff and pharmacy staff was in the main positive with several people feeling the
service was worthwhile and had improved access, and working relationships between practice staff and
pharmacy staff. There were several mentions of the paperwork being too onerous which has not previously been
raised in other areas and needs exploring further. All suggested the service could be further improved through
increased understanding of the service, promotion of the service to patients and extension of the current
formulary.
Limitations
Other studies have looked at the impact of minor ailment schemes on general practice prescribing for minor
ailments and also the number of re-consultation rates. It is not possible to evaluate this with current available
data, however the potential use of PACT and practice date could be explored for future evaluation of the service.
The GP time released was based on the patients specifying where they would have gone this may differ from
where they may have gone had the service not been in place. The patient opinion data was collected by the
pharmacists providing the service which may have biased the results due to the patient not wanting to offend
the pharmacist. Although the same was found through the patient feedback questionnaire, albeit a small
number of respondents.
Recent links with NHS 111 have embedded Pharmacy First into their triage pathways. There is potential to
show further cost savings through data from NHS 111 once this data is available.
6 CONCLUSIONS
Overall, in the first ten months, Pharmacy First has shown to be a cost-effective way to manage patients
presenting with minor ailments. A number of consultations have been delivered through community pharmacies
releasing an estimated 117 hours GP time. The findings for this service are in line with the findings of other minor
ailment schemes, however uptake has been lower than other areas which needs to be explored further. A
number of further actions could be taken improve the record keeping and to strengthen the evaluation. These
are outlined in the summary of recommendations below.
27
Recommendations
Determine potential reason in the variation of uptake through discussion with pharmacy and GP practice
staff and analysis of minor ailment consultation rates in GP practices pre and post- implementation.
Consider further ways to increase promotion of the service amongst staff and patients to ensure
appropriate use and referral
Consider joint GP CP meetings to improve understanding of service between providers and improve
understanding, engagement, referral rates and use plus explore the perceived barriers eg amount of
paperwork
Work with GP practices to ensure that Pharmacy First is embedded into their triage systems and patient pathways
Review other reasons why the uptake is less than that of other areas eg mapping to social deprivation
Conduct GP read code analysis to determine whether Pharmacy First is being reused by the same
patients
Continue to work with NHS111 to ensure Pharmacy First is an integral part of the urgent care provision
in the CCG area.
Review list of conditions and formulary with the Pharmacy First project group and devise a further
business case to expand the service to include further conditions such as head lice, diarrhoea and
vomiting, mild eczema, heartburn/indigestion and constipation.
Remind pharmacies of the requirement to provide written information in accordance with the service
specification where appropriate
Promote increased recording of patient access to Pharmacy First on GP electronic health record.
7 REFERENCES
1) Watson MC. Community Pharmacy Management of Minor Illness. MINA study Report. Final Report to
Pharmacy Research UK. 2014. Accessed at http://www.pharmacyresearchuk.org/waterway/wp-
content/uploads/2014/01/MINA-Study-Final-Report.pdf on 26th June 2014.
2) Paudyal V, Watson MC, Sach T, Porteous T, Bond CM, Wright DJ, Cleland J, Barton G, Holland R. Are
pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes a substitute for other service providers? A systematic review.
Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(612):e472-81.
3) Community Pharmacy West Yorkshire. Bradford City CCG Self Care Service. Pharmacy First - 8 Month
Evaluation. (2014) Accessed at http://www.cpwy.org/doc/795.pdf
4) Curtis L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care2011. PSSRU. 2011. Accessed at
http://www.pssru.ac.uk/archive/pdf/uc/uc2011/uc2011.pdf on 26th June 2014.
5) National tariff payment system 2014/15. Annex 5A - National prices. Accessed at
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-tariff-payment-system-2014-to-2015 on 26th
June 2014.
6) National Services Scotland (NHS). Prescribing & Medicines: Minor Ailments Service (MAS). Financial Year
2013/14. Information Services Division. Accessed at https://isdscotland.scot.nhs.uk/Health-
Topics/Prescribing-and-Medicines/Publications/2014-06-24/2014-06-24-Prescribing-
MinorAilmentsService-Report.pdf?12537783385 on 26th June 2014.