nlii new orleans jan. 25-28 2003 vision impossible? arts and science approaches to learner-centred...
TRANSCRIPT
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Vision Impossible?
Arts and Science approaches tolearner-centred practice
Cyprien LomasJoanne NakonechnySophia Nussbaum
Ulrich RauchUniversity of British Columbia
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
The University of British Columbia
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Mixed-Mode (hybrid) Projects
•Inquiry into teaching with technology to increase the
effectiveness of learning outcomes
Objective: develop 2 mixed-mode courses
•Arts (English 111: Approaches to Non- Fictional Prose)
•Science (Chemistry 121/123: Introduction to Scientific Research (Lab course)
Projects: • High level of autonomy • Central funding: $200,000/year• Year two of a two year project
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Learning Mode
Deep structure vs surface structure learning:
•Concepts difficult for novice learners
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Learning Mode Applied
English:
Guided Discovery
•Concepts applied in an experimental environment
•Lab > development of experimental skills and
knowledge
•Concepts developed in an exploratory environment
•Forum/papers > development and
recognition of argumentative strategies
Chemistry:
Guided Inquiry
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
What do we need?
Development of seamless mixed-mode learning
environment:
•Effective technology that allows students and instructors to shape the learning experience.
•Guidance to facilitate students’ deep structure learning
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Chem 123 Lab
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
English 111
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Tools
• Effective learning tools, both digital, and print technology, that allows student and instructors to
shape the learning experience.
• Ability of the medium to carry the ‘voices’ of participants (students & instructors)
• Technology to facilitate ‘Personalized Learning’
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Customizable
parameters can be partially modified
Commercial or open- source
VL, WebCT (container)
Flexible
Parameters can be completely modified
shared Lab manual
(malleable)
Rigid
parameters cannot be modified
Bridging to the Lab (product)
calculator
(prescriptive)
Tool Development
Rigidity Continuum
Author Control
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Tool Outcomes
• pedagogical goals need to drive tool development
• Combination of tools works well• Seamless integration
• provide scaffolding for students to approach
materials
• development of seamless mixed-mode learning
environment is complex and labour intensive
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
• Resources (tools): seamless, author control
• Learning Environment: •author control <-->student needs
• Pedagogical goals: •deep structure (conceptual) learning
• Team process: Integrated teams
• Institutional support:•recognition of multiple development paths
Lessons Learned
NLIINew Orleans
Jan. 25-28 2003
Thank You
•Cyprien Lomas [email protected]•Joanne Nakonechny [email protected]
•Sophia Nussbaum [email protected]•Ulrich Rauch [email protected]