north sydney foreshore access strategy · north sydney foreshore access strategy 1.0 introduction...

Berrys Bay

ST

TCHISON ST

ALB

OXLEY

XLEY

ST

RRIIVVEERR

RD

ST

IGH

ST

Balls Head

Bay

Lavender

Bay

Neutral

BayMosman

Bay

PORT JACKSON

BERRY ISLAND

RESERVE

TELOPEA

ST

XPRESSWAYAATTCCHHIISSOONN LLAA

AALLBBAANNYY LLAA HHUU

MMEE

LLAA

BORONIA

DONNELLY RD

ST

HAMI

LTON

WWAR

RIN

AVE

MASSEY STRO

NG

ST

MORDEN ST

CHURC

HILL

OO

PARK

AVE

PROSPECTCC AVE

RD

LLLAAA

TTTT ATT RD

ANBROOK

AVE

ST

RDEDDUUCCAATIOONN

LALA

AL LIST ER

BBAA

RR RRYY

BENNETT

ALF

RED

T

ERNEST

AAVE

Y

AVAA E

LYTT

O

BBAARRDD

SSLLGD

N SFALCON

SST

ODIE

TUCC K

ERSTT

CARLOWST

CCAASS S

INSS

LALL

CASSIN AVE

PA

RIDGE

ST

REN

ST

HHAARN

EETTEEETT

SSTT

WWAARR

DDSSTTSSSS

HAMPDEN ST

WA

LKER

STELLI

O TT

ST

BERRY

ST

DEN

I SO

NST

ITT L

ES P

RIN

GST

SSSTTTMIL

L ER

ST

S T

Y

ST

HAZE ST

ST

KK IINNGG

LLAANN

EE

RD

SINCCLAIAAR ST

RD

McHATTONNES

T

HARRIOTROWS

BAY

RROS

SSTT

HORRACE ST

LARKIN

RD

WOOLCOTT

HEA

D

WOOD ST

ST

HEA

D

DRIVE

BALL

S

MILR

AY

RD

AVE

SHIR

LEY

CABLE ST

AVE

TRYON

PRI

MOUNTST

ST

EEDDWWDDDD

AARDD

STT

HUR

ST

AARRTTHHUURR

LLNN

MIDDDLEMISS

S

D

ST

BESHELL UR

R OW

AY

ST

WYC

OM

BE

RD

BADDEN

RD

NO

RTH

WHALIN

LLIITT

TTLL EE

McDO

PP

A

Gore

Cove

Careening Cove

McMahons Point

Milsons Point

RobertsonsPoint

Kirribilli Point

Kurraba PointKu

JAM

E SP L

M

WWH

EE

Kirribilli Wharf

High StreetWharf

CremorneWharf

Old CremorneO

McMahon'sPointWharfr

BELL

SA

VE

LLAANN GG

LLEY

AVE

SST

MAC

P HER

S ON

MIL

LER

S T

S T

CAMMERAY PARK

ST LEONARDS PARK

CREMEE

ORN

E

RESE

BALLS

PRIMROSE PARK

SMOOTHEY

PA

RK

PARK

BRENNANPARK

BLUES POINT

RESERVE

KEKK STER TOTT NPARAA KK

INT

RESERVE

CREM ORNE

RESERVE

BADANGIRESERVE

LANAA

GLEY

P LLAA CCAAAA

EE

LOOOO KOU

MO

OD

IEL

ARE

SERVRR

COL I

NDIAA

RREESSEE

RRVVEE

LADY GOWRIELLOOOOKKOOUUTTUUU

OYSTER COVE RESERVEOY

DORIS FIFFTTT ONPARAA K

NORTH SYDNEYCIVIC CENTRE

GORE

COVE

FRED H UTLEY

MATER GARAA DENSS

BADANGIRESERVE

NNIICCHOL

STSRRERR ET

CCLO

WILLLLOOOO

BOA

TBBTTUUII

LLDDEERR

SW

ALKLL

SUGAR WORKSGRESERVE

SINCLAL IRSTREEEE T

PPEEDDEESSTTRRIIAANNLLIINNKK

ARBYRDENS

EX BP SITE

EXC O

AL

LOAOO

DE R

/CA

LTEX

SITE

KKINNG

STRROO

AADD

RESE

RVE R I

D GE

S TREE

ETR O

AG

OODG

C LORR SRR UUSS

RRE

HIGH STREETRESERVE

DENOS L

BLUE

RRDD

LLS

GA

WA

RREX

P RES

SWAYAA

BRO O

KST

LL

Prepared by:

Environmental Partnership (NSW) Pty Ltd April 2007

Prepared for:

NORTH SYDNEY FORESHORE ACCESS STRATEGY

North Sydney Council200 Miller StreetNorth Sydney NSW 2060

This page intentionally left blank for double sided printing

April 2007


CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

1.0 INTRODUCTION 111.1 Purpose of the Foreshore Access Strategy 111.2 Study Process 111.3 An Access Vision 121.4 How to use the Access Strategy 12

2.0 EXISTING ACCESS REVIEW 132.1 Existing Access System 132.2 Accessing the System 152.3 Missing Links 162.4 Facilities 17

3.0 ACCESS MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK 193.1 Generally 193.2 Management Objectives 193.3 Access Management Framework 203.4 Walking Tracks System 293.5 Review of Access Strategies 30 3.5.1 Upgrade Existing Access 30 3.5.2 New Tracks 30 3.5.3 Open Grassed Routes 30 3.5.4 Links Adjoining Privately Owned

Foreshores 31 3.5.5 Intertidal Access 32 3.5.6 Roadside Links 33 3.5.7 Craft Access 33

4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM 354.1 General Principles 354.2 Elements of the Access Hierarchy and related

Design Principles 364.2.1 Walking Tracks (AS 2156) 37 - All Access Track (Class 1) 37 - Walking Path (Class 2) 38 - Walking Track (Class 3) 39 - Hiking Track (Class 4) 404.2.2 Shared Use Trails 414.2.3 Footpaths adjoining roads 424.2.4 Boardwalks 434.2.5 Grassed Access Links 444.2.6 Dedicated Open Space 454.2.7 Intertidal Access 464.2.8 Craft Access 47 Dinghy Storage & Launching 474.2.9 Craft Access 48 Kayak Storage & Launching 484.3 Material Finishes 49

5.0 ACCESS PLAN 515.1 Generally 515.2 The Access Plan 515.2.1 Gore Cove - Area 1 565.2.2 Balls Head Bay - Area 2 585.2.3 Berrys Bay - Area 3 605.2.4 Lavender Bay - Area 4 625.2.5 Milsons Point to Kirribilli - Area 5 645.2.6 Careening Cove - Area 6 665.2.7 Neutral Bay - Area 7 685.2.8 Shell Cove - Area 8 705.2.9 Mosman Bay - Area 9 725.2.10 Middle Harbour - Willoughby and Long Bay

- Area 10 74

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION 776.1 Criteria for priorities decision making 776.2 Design and Materials lifecycle assessment 796.3 Costs Framework 806.4 Action Plan Overview 816.5 Action Plans 846.6 Monitoring & Evaluation 96

7.0 APPENDIX 977.1 Background Review 977.2 Capital Works Costs 1057.3 Public Exhibition Review of Submissions 107

April 2007


1.0 IntroductionSydney Harbour is a magnet for both residents of the city and visitors alike, drawing us to its foreshores and to its waters for recreation, exercise, and to experience its physical beauty.

North Sydney local Government area is blessed with a signifi cant portion of the harbour foreshores (18.6km) with approximately 60% of these as public reserves and parklands.

Access to the foreshores has become a major community issue and a key aim of local government and other land managers. However sustainable and responsible access is not merely a matter of quantity, and physical provision. Quality of access experience and a balanced consideration of other values including ecology and habitat and cultural heritage are the fundamental requirements.

With quality of experience and sustainability as guiding principles – extension of access to bridge missing links can be rationally pursued.

This strategy examines the existing foreshore access system in this context to identify where missing links to continuous access can be sustainably addressed, and where opportunities to extend access through redeveloping sites should be pursued.

The strategy also identifi es an access plan and establishes priorities for ongoing implementation and enhancement of existing access.

2.0 The Access VisionNorth Sydney Council has identifi ed the following vision for foreshore access:

To promote and improve access links to the North Sydney foreshore for the local and wider community from both the land and the water to continue sustainable use and enjoyment of Sydney Harbour as a unique waterfront environment.

Fundamental to North Sydney’s vision is that provision of access is enhanced both in quantitative terms (as in extent of access) and in qualitative terms (in relation to recreational, visual, and environmental values).

3.0 Existing Access SystemForeshore access in North Sydney can be expressed in several key zones, each with distinguishing characteristics:a) West of Harbour Bridge - relatively continuous foreshore accessb) East of Harbour Bridge to Cremorne Reserve - nodal foreshore parks (bay heads

or points) with roadway linksc) Cremorne Reserve - continuous foreshore access through reserve / parklandd) Middle Harbour - nodal foreshore parks (bay heads or points) with predominantly

steep roadway links

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

West of Harbour Bridge

East of Harbour Bridge

Cremorne Reserve

Middle Harbour

Environmental Partnership (NSW)

4.0 Access StrategiesThe existing access system and opportunities to enhance access and bridge missing links generate a range of different forms of access each of importance to the overall integrated access system. These include:

1. Upgrade Existing LinksWhile there is a fundamental need and desirability to address ‘missing links’ in the overall access system as most appropriate, it is also important to maintain and improve access where required for safety, experiential quality, or other compliance with Standards.

2. New TracksNew tracks will be designed and implemented to address missing links and to improve access to existing tracks and paths.

3. Open Grassed RoutesThere are a number of locations across the foreshore where access is formed by maintained grassed areas without formalised access paths.

4. Links Adjoining Privately Owned ForeshoresDedicated Open SpaceWhere large foreshore properties are subject to redevelopment, Council and State Government planning controls may require the developer to provide dedicated open space to the foreshore frontage.

Rights of WaySubject to legal negotiations and formalisation rights of way offer potential to address missing links to privately owned foreshore areas.

BoardwalksBoardwalks are raised structures over water that can address gaps in land based access.

5. Intertidal AccessMany parts of the Harbour foreshore offer sandy beaches or rock platforms that can afford temporary access at low tide.

6. Roadside LinksRoadside links or on street footpaths are a fundamental and highly signifi cant part of the function and character of foreshore access in North Sydney.

7. Craft AccessAncillary to walking access to the foreshore is the provision of storage and launching access for water based recreation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Balls Head Road

Kurraba Point Reserve

Open space to the front of Wondakiah

Right of way

Boardwalk - Neutral Bay

Beach area to Badangi Reserve

April 2007


5.0 The Foreshore Access PlanThe strategy identifi es an overall access plan as a series of precinct plans – which identify for each area:• Existing access• Pressures• Opportunities

General planning and investigation actions include the following:Ecological mapping• Identify locations and distribution of sensitive habitat areas including intertidal

zones• Review against access strategy routes• Identify problem areas for detailed examination, review of alternatives, and ongoing

monitoring until addressed

Signage strategy• Compile a coordinated approach for signage which defi nes a hierarchy of unifi ed

signage types, which integrates appropriate aspects of existing signage, and provides a principle for their location including track diffi culty grades

• Consider signage to railway stations as key link to foreshore access system• Strategy to consider the relationship of linkages to adjoining LGA’s and land

managers (eg NPWS / SHFT)• Ongoing programme of signage installation

Heritage• Compile locations and nature of areas and elements of heritage signifi cance to

foreshore open space and relevant private lands• Ascertain heritage values / issues relevant to a specifi c site where works are being

considered• Integrate heritage consideration into resolution of site specifi c designs

Safety audit• Identify areas of poor visual safety and security through site inspection and public

reporting• Review specifi c sites to ascertain cause and potential resolution: - management of vegetation - provision of improved lighting - review of track alignment

Access monitoring and recordingPut in place monitoring programme for cost effective cyclical observations of usage levels, issues, maintenance, and community feedback

Facilitation of intertidal access• Review operational implications of intertidal access with NSW Maritime - confi rm

responsibilities• Liaise with NSW Maritime regarding ongoing programme to facilitate intertidal

access

Community liaison• Continue programme for regular interaction between Council and organised

walking groups to enable reporting of issues, and monitoring feedback• Put in place maintenance responsiveness that enables issues to be addressed in

timely fashion

Liaison with transport authoritiesLiaise with transport authorities to improve public transport effectiveness to nodal open spaces and foreshore access system

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


View conservation / management• Identify views and vistas to be conserved• Integrate conservation of views to relevant Council planning controls• Integrate vegetation management into relevant Council planning controls

Planning controls / mechanismsInvestigate potential for incorporation of mechanisms within Council planning policies to facilitate future foreshore access (land dedication, rights of way, easements) to important missing links.

The actions defi ned for each of the precincts include:Gore Cove• Investigate design opportunity for path upgrade to Russell Street to improve grade

/ accessibility• Potential to upgrade pathways through Smoothey Park to shared pedestrian /

cycleways to accommodate commuter access• Improve lighting to Smoothey Park to provide safer commuter route to

Wollstonecraft Station.• Potential for future access across existing residential properties and Fisheries site

if redevelopment of these properties was to occur, providing extension of Gore Cove Track access to Berry Island and water access.

• Review opportunities for implementation formalised pedestrian crossings to Russell Street and River Road.

Balls Head Bay• Wayfi nding signage to better identify public access to Oyster Cove Reserve.• Orientation point at junction of Balls Head Road and Horace Street as key access

marker to Coal Loader, BP site, Balls Head Reserve and Gore Cove, including distances to key destinations.

• Provision of improved viewing area to Horace Street capitalising on existing views to Iron Cove and Balmain.

• Provision of formalised footpath to western side of Balls Head Road and improved crossing facilities / amenity in conjunction with landscape works currently under implementation.

• Potential for unifi ed path treatment / connection from HMAS Waterhen to Coal Loader. Further development of this access connection may incorporate an identifi able / consistent path treatment including landscaping to connect Coal Loader, BP site and Balls Head as an important open space loop.

• Development of Coal Loader site will provide new open space and access opportunities, including north-south pathway through the Coal Loader site linking to Balls Head Bushland tracks, harbour access link stairs from upper terrace of Coal Loader to the harbour’s edge. Also facilities to be developed as part of NSW Maritime as part of the redevelopment of the Coal Loader Wharf including pedestrian access to top deck, and publicly accessible lower level dinghy and kayak storage and launching area.

• Review shared access effectiveness to Balls Head Drive and implement further pedestrian safety measures if required.

• Maintenance and upgrade works to Balls Head Reserve to improve quality and usability of existing access.

• Maintenance works to Badangi Track.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Smoothey Park asphalt pathway

Horace Street steps

April 2007


Berrys Bay• Potential for upgrading of Balls Head lookout and picnic areas.• Maintenance and upgrade works to tracks and maintained viewing / rest areas

to Balls Head Reserve to enhance and rationalise existing access to enable more effi cient maintenance.

• Quarantine Station redevelopment, incorporating community based use of existing buildings and public access

• Incorporate public access into redevelopment of working waterfront site to ensure continuous accessible foreshore pathway connection from BP site parklands to Balls Head Reserve, including access through Quarantine Station site.

• Provide dinghy / kayak storage facilities and launching pontoon - possible locations under consideration include working waterfront site, Quarantine Station, and the BP Dolphin Wharf in consultation with NSW Maritime. Provision of access to and upgrade of the existing Dolphin Wharf for recreational and commuter (ferry) boating access in consultation with NSW Maritime and Sydney Ferries.

• Provision of access steps down foreshore embankment in BP site parkland to allow access to waters edge.

• Potential formalisation of grassed access link to Waverton Park foreshore.• Proposed provision and upgrade of Commodore Street stairway link as identifi ed

in 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy. • Potential that a portion of rail lands to the rear of Noakes may provide improved

access connection to the eastern side of Berrys Bay• Stairway connection to Blues Point Reserve to establish loop access - requires

access from Blues Point Road to be formally defi ned as a public access route as access currently occurs / appears as private driveway.

• Potential future access from Sawmillers Reserve to Blues Point through planning mechanisms such as land dedications.

Lavender Bay• 33 East Crescent Street - foreshore access steps to be maintained and existing deck

structure to be rebuilt. Opportunities for continuation of foreshore access to be closely monitored and pursued (eg redevelopment of sites).

• Refurbishment of stairs from East Crescent Street to McMahons Point Wharf as identifi ed in 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy.

• Preparation of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan - scheduled 2006/2007• Additional dinghy storage facilities to Lavender Bay (Quibaree Park) to consolidate

existing use.• Refurbishment and potential relocation of amenities block to Quibaree Park as

identifi ed in 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy.• Lighting of Lavender Bay foreshore walk to Milsons Point to improve commuter

use and safety.• Potential incorporation of barbeque facilities to Lavender Bay parklands to enhance

foreshore use.• Potential for long term use of rail lands as public open space.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Quibaree Park

View from Balls Head Reserve lookout


Milsons Point to Kirribilli• Potential cross park link through Bradfi eld Park.• Proposed amenities block to Bradfi eld Park adjoining Olympic Drive.• Enhancement of north-south access path to foreshore adjoining Broughton

Street.• Potential to incorporate pedestrian and feature lighting to area of Dr Mary Booth

Reserve and Kirribilli Foreshore Reserve foreshore walkways to improve use as commuter link.

• Lift access to Sydney Harbour Bridge pedestrian walkway to improve accessibility for a wide range of users.

• Investigate opportunities for long term potential access to be achieved around Kirribilli Point in liaison and consultation with Federal Government.

Careening Cove• Upgrade of boat ramp access to Milson Park in collaboration with Sydney Flying

Squadron.• Refurbishment of access stairs from Milson Park to High Street as identifi ed in 2004

Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy.

Neutral Bay• Proposed refurbishment of amenities block to Kesterton Park (completed 2006).• Future development of Platypus site to incorporate public access connections

including potential boardwalk link to Kesterton Park.• Potential future access through Captain Cook Cruises marina if site is redeveloped

or through access negotiations with relevant land owners.• Potential future access across Customs Marine Headquarters.• Any redevelopment to incorporate continuation of link from eastern foreshore to

Anderson Park.• Access link to Nutcote (home of May Gibbs) - design underway.• Potential to rebuild boat slipway at Kurraba Point Reserve and provide formal

dinghy storage racks within the Reserve.• Potential incorporation of barbeque facilities to enhance foreshore use of Kurraba

Point.• Upgrade access connection into Kurraba Point Reserve.• Potential improvements to Hodgson Lookout area including playground

upgrade.

Shell Cove• Potential to incorporate dinghy storage facility to Council jetty.• Potential to provide consolidated dinghy storage points and designated track

access to mitigate current impacts.• Future potential to provide disabled access from Bogota Avenue along western

side of Cremorne Reserve.• Lighting upgrade to Cremorne Reserve (completed 2006).

Mosman Bay• Upgrade of asphalt pavement surface to Lower Spofforth Walk.• Potential for additional formal lookout to Robertsons Point.

Middle Harbour• Targeted footpath upgrade to key walking routes.• Improved signage to direct users to foreshore access routes.• Formalisation of grassed access link to Tunks Park to West Street to provide

enhanced entrance - potential joint project with Willoughby City Council.• Potential for formalised dinghy storage to Tunks Park.• Improved access at Folly Point including consolidation of dinghy storage (design

underway).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Informal dinghy storage to Folly Point

Cremorne Reserve

Dilapidated slipway - Kurraba Point

View from Milson Park

Dr Mary Booth Reserve

April 2007


1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose of the Foreshore Access StrategyEnvironmental Partnership were commissioned in April 2006 to prepare an Access Strategy for the North Sydney Foreshore by North Sydney Council.

The key objectives of the Access Strategy as outlined in Council’s brief were:• To investigate and document the existing and potential foreshore access points• To investigate and identify the opportunities and constraints of completing the

missing links in the continuous access along North Sydney’s foreshore• To investigate and identify the opportunities and constraints of improving water

based access to the foreshore (ie. soft access facilities such as pontoons and dinghy storage)

• To assess community expectations and concerns regarding foreshore access• To identify alternative mechanisms for achieving improved foreshore access (ie.

acquisitions, boardwalks, pathways, pontoons)• To identify the opportunities and constraints implementing the mechanisms• To investigate funding sources (ie. s94, grants, capital works budgets)• To make general and specifi c recommendations to Council for implementing

specifi c foreshore access improvements projects, including time frames and priorities.

1.2 Study ProcessThe development of the plan has involved a review of the objectives for access to the foreshore, and the issues that need to be addressed in the resolution of an Access Management Framework. The framework aims to guide long term decision making and has in turn informed the development of design and materials principles identifi ed in an Access Hierarchy for foreshore access improvements.

The table below summarises the main phases of the study process.

develop access plan

review existing access routes

review access issues

confi rm foreshore access objectives

develop principles for foreshore access

compile staged action plan

review costings

review staging priorities

develop foreshore design principles

community consultation


1.3 An Access VisionIt is Council’s long term goal to provide a continuous walkway along the foreshores of North Sydney. In keeping with this goal, the following vision for foreshore access provides a broad directive for future access provision and improvement.

To promote and improve access links to the North Sydney foreshore for the local and wider community from both the land and the water to continue sustainable use and enjoyment of Sydney Harbour as a unique waterfront environment.

Fundamental to North Sydney’s vision is that provision of access is enhanced both in quantitative terms (as in extent of access) and in qualitative terms (in relation to recreational, visual, and environmental values).

1.4 How to use the Access StrategyThe Access Strategy is aimed to function at several levels:

• In considering and responding to existing access constraints and opportunities Refer to Section 2.0 Existing Access Review

• In considering and resolving responses to typical access planning, implementation, and management issues

Refer to Section 3.0 Access Management Framework

• In defi ning broad principles for each element of an access hierarchy that are to be considered in future planning and detailed design of access linkages

Refer to Section 4.0 Access Hierarchy

• In defi ning the general alignment and relationship of key access elements for development in ongoing planning and design

Refer to Section 5.0 Access Plan

• In defi ning implementation staging of access opportunities to the foreshore Refer to Section 6.0 Implementation

1.0 INTRODUCTION

April 2007


2.0 EXISTING ACCESS REVIEW

2.1 Existing Access SystemThe existing access system to North Sydney is both infl uenced and characterised by a number of factors. These factors effectively impact upon or in some cases determine the extent and quality of foreshore access and include: - Open space provision and distribution - Topography - Water access - Materials

Open Space Provision and DistributionNorth Sydney is fortunate to have a large number of foreshore open spaces including bushland areas that provide access to much of the foreshore. However the areas of greatest expanse or continuity are generally focused to the western side of the Harbour Bridge. This has created a signifi cant difference in the extent of foreshore access across the LGA. Typically the character of access to the western side of the bridge is focused on open space and bushland areas as the major avenues to access. To the eastern side of the bridge and to Middle Harbour access is predominantly to on street footpaths with more nodal open spaces at bay heads or points. In these areas continuous access is sparse and is commonly disjointed without a clear direction to the foreshore access. Cremorne Reserve is the most continuous section of foreshore access to the eastern side of the Bridge, and is in itself a unique recreational and access resource. The reserve combines residential frontages with a well defi ned and accessible foreshore system.

The provision of open space areas also provides a variety of access experiences varying across formal parks, newly developed or soon to be developed sites and bushland areas. Formal park areas typifi ed by wide expanses of grass, allow for active recreation along the foreshore and also provide large gathering spaces for events on the Harbour such as regattas or the new years eve fi reworks. Newly developed parks such as the former BP site, offer a different landscape experience with the designs capitalising on the industrial history of the area. It is anticipated that other park developments such as the Coal Loader will also focus on the working waterfront character as a key design consideration.

The bushland areas of North Sydney provide one of the most unique foreshore experiences across the Harbour. The areas of bushland including Berry Island and Balls Head Reserve establish the character and atmosphere of more remote bushland providing distinct relief from the surrounding urban environment.

TopographyOne of the most infl uential factors affecting access across all areas of North Sydney is the steep topography of the area. This has signifi cant impact on the accessibility and usability of foreshore areas, in many areas preventing disabled access. The steep topography also creates the need for stairway access to many areas along the foreshore again inhibiting access to many users. A positive consequence of the steep topography to the water is that many areas across North Sydney provide panoramic views of the Harbour and the City. This has greatest impact to areas where access is limited to on street footpaths, providing views to the foreshore without being able to physically access it.

The steep terrain across the LGA also impacts upon the availability of water based access. In many areas the water is visible, however the steep nature of the edge prevents access.

Grassed open space to Berry Island

BP Parklands

Sawmillers Reserve

Steep access down to Folly Point

Stair access from East Crescent Street



Water AccessThe available water based access can generally be characterised by the natural areas of access including beach areas, or areas of gently sloping edge and the constructed access facilities which includes slipways, pontoons and jetties.

The demand for dinghy / small craft storage is such that informal storage occurs at many areas across North Sydney. This type of informal craft storage will generally be as simple as the dinghy or kayak stood against a tree or fence and affi xed with small chains or rope and padlocks. Generally informal storage occurs adjoining the areas where boats are moored, and are utilised to access these boat moorings. In many areas the presence of informal craft storage creates an identifi able Sydney Harbour character that refl ects the use and enjoyment of the Harbour. In other areas such as Cremorne Reserve, the informal storage is having negative environmental impacts as users track off the main formal path and create new tracks to the waters edge leading to erosion. Formal storage facilities are available however these are limited currently to Quibaree Park and Willoughby Street, Careening Cove, and are not currently meeting the demand.

MaterialsA variety of materials or access types are utilised across the existing access system, generally responding to use and the surrounding environment. Bushland areas such as Berry Island utilise informal dirt or soil tracks which provide minimal impact to the bushland environment. Maintenance access to some bushland areas is diffi cult and the informal tracks also offer a low maintenance solution to access. An issue with these type of tracks however, is the rough surface and varying width which makes them unsuitable for disabled access. Similarly there are many areas of open space grassed access which lack formal, hardened path surfaces which may also limit disabled access opportunities. These open areas however, provide both access to the foreshore and opportunities for active recreation.

Concrete and asphalt paths are commonly utilised across the access system and are relatively effi cient materials in terms of initial costs and recurring maintenance. There are some areas such as the Lower Spofforth Walk where the asphalt pavement is in poor condition and requires replacement. An issue with concrete pathways, evident in some areas of Cremorne Reserve is the shifting / lifting of pavements creating potential trip hazards.

As previously noted there are many areas across North Sydney that provide stair access. These stairs of varying quality and condition, with many sections on steep inclines limiting the use potential of these access points. Stairways are generally either concrete or stone, with many areas such as Balls Head Reserve providing informal stone steps to the waters edge.

On street footpath access is a core component of the existing access system, particularly to the western side of the Harbour Bridge and Middle Harbour. Footpaths vary in pedestrian amenity with some streets such as Elamang Street to Kirribilli / Careening Cove providing footpath access to both sides of the street at a relatively easy grade and street tree planting. Other footpaths such as John Street in Berrys Bay, is very narrow, ascends a very steep slope and the footpath provision ceases at the junction of the railway bridge overpass, forcing pedestrians onto the roadway.

Boardwalks have been utilised in different areas across the existing access system. Both timber and steel grated boardwalks and decks have been used and provide in some cases an opportunity for foreshore access to be achieved across areas where land based access is not possible. The BP site parkland has used boardwalks extensively as an access mechanism that ‘fl oats’ above the rocky or undulating ground surface below.


Boat ramp to Tunks Park

Informal dirt track

Asphalt path

Concrete path

April 2007



2.2 Accessing the SystemThe existing foreshore access system can be accessed by essentially fi ve modes: - Public transport including trains, ferries and buses - Private vehicles - Pedestrian or walking - Cycle access - Water based access

It is Council’s goal to encourage use of public transport through ongoing enhancement of the transport system. The western side of the Harbour Bridge is well served by trains with stations at Milsons Point, North Sydney, Waverton and Wollstonecraft. The stations are important nodes for the initial connection to the foreshore. On road and through open space linkages provide pedestrians / commuters further connection from the stations down to the foreshore. Ferries play an integral role to the transport system of North Sydney with wharves scattered from McMahons Point to Cremorne. Important commuter links commence from the wharves, and the location of these at the waters edge makes them ideal opportunities to extend and continue foreshore access. Additional ferry stops to the west of the Harbour Bridge should be encouraged, for example by incorporating facilities in the refurbishment of the BP site Dolphin Wharf in Berrys Bay or the Coal Loader Wharf in Balls Head Bay. Buses are also an important component of the available public transport generally providing services to major roads and signifi cant commuter routes.

Vehicular access is one of the most common forms of access to the foreshore, especially for visitors to the North Sydney area. There is limited parking facilities to the extent of the foreshore access system. This has been previously identifi ed in the 2003 Foreshore Parks and Reserves Plan of Management as a perceived restriction to use and appreciation of North Sydney’s foreshore open space. The Plan of Management identifi ed the areas where a lack of parking is most signifi cant are at Cremorne Reserve, Kurraba Reserve, Milson Park, Blues Point Reserve and Berry Island Reserve. With development of major regional sites such as the BP parklands and new sites at the Coal Loader and HMAS Platypus it appears that a lack of carparking will continue to be an access connection pressure and ways to increase turnover of parking in these areas needs to be considered. However ongoing commitment to the improvement of the public transport system should aim to offset an increased demand for parking.

Walking / pedestrian access to the foreshore system is generally via on road footpaths which vary in quality. It is notable for pedestrians that generally, given the topography of North Sydney access down to the foreshore will be a relatively easy walk down hill, whereas the access back up to train stations or main roads will be up very steep footpath routes. Walking access may therefore not be achievable by all users including the elderly, children or people with prams etc. Generally walking routes are fairly direct and most walks are generally signposted. However walking access much of the Middle Harbour area is very convoluted without clear orientation to walking routes.

Bicycle access to North Sydney’s foreshore is generally restricted to undefi ned on road routes. Similarly to the pedestrian access, the routes from the foreshore may be incredibly steep limiting use. The nature of the cycle access to roadways also limits use, generally limiting this to experienced cyclists. The 2004 North Sydney Bike Plan identifi ed a number of recommendations including proposed routes across the LGA. The proposed works identifi ed by this plan will involve a variety of cycle access treatments including on road bike lanes, shared bike / parking lanes, shared road space and shared footways. There are also only a few areas of bike parking facilities currently available across North Sydney which may also currently inhibit cycle access.

Wollstonecraft Station

Bus services to Blues Point

Cremorne Wharf

Car and trailer parking facilities to Tunks Park

Council jetty to Shell Cove



2.3 Missing LinksMissing links or discontinuous foreshore access occurs at several areas across North Sydney. Generally missing links occur where the continuity of publicly owned land is broken. Typically the breaks in continuous access occur at sections of State or Federally owned land, working waterfront zones or strips of private residential land use.

Some State or Federal Government strategic waterfront sites, such as the HMAS Waterhen or Government House to Kirribilli Point, have high security seemingly preventing any public access into these sites. This effectively makes any access opportunities through or across these sites very diffi cult. Other areas of working waterfront such as boatyards have a high intensity of use that requires careful design to ensure safe public access whilst not unduly impeding site operations. It is also important to recognise that remaining working sites on the Harbour help to sustain an identifi able working Harbour image, contributing to the overall character of the foreshore system. However with careful design, particularly at the site development stage public access can be facilitated through these sites, thereby balancing these two important objectives.

Stretches of privately owned residential properties that create gaps in continuous access are common across North Sydney, but are more focused to the eastern side of the Harbour Bridge and Middle Harbour where gaps in access are frequent. Access opportunities to these areas are often limited, in some areas private ownership of land extends to the low water mark preventing intertidal access.

Working waterfront to Berrys Bay

Path access to front of HMAS Waterhen

HMAS Platypus

Residential properties to Neutral Bay

2.2 Accessing the System (continued)Water based access into the foreshore access system is another potential access route, and provides another interesting aspect to the recreational opportunities of the Harbour foreshore. Limited storage facilities for small craft and few wharf and launching areas where boats can pull up to the shore currently restrict the amount of use that can be supported.

April 2007



2.4 FacilitiesFacilities along the existing foreshore access system have signifi cant infl uence on the intensity of use of foreshore areas. Facilities may generally include toilets, playgrounds and barbeques. Other facilities that are more focused on water based use of the foreshore include boat ramps or launching areas, and formal storage facilities.

Toilet facilities are generally within foreshore parks and reserves. These are scattered across the LGA and Council has endeavoured to create a generally uniform amenities block structure and have previously identifi ed in the 2004 Draft Foreshore Access Strategy that facilities to some foreshore areas require refurbishment. The current provision of toilet facilities is of a sustainable nature to support the current foreshore access.

Playgrounds are also present within many of the foreshore parks and reserves. These are an important facility for use of the foreshore by children and families. The play areas are of varying quality but they are generally quite small and provides the greatest play opportunities to small children. A childrens bicycle track is also provided in Brightmore Reserve, which appears to be a well used local facility. Fitness equipment is also available to Tunks Park which provides a recreational resource for older children and adults utilising the park.

Barbeque facilities are provided at Balls Head Reserve and have recently been installed to Primrose Park and Tunks Park. Barbeques provide a facility that promotes use of parks for family picnics and gatherings and generally encourage a longer use of the foreshore open space areas. The Access Plan suggests areas where additional barbeque facilities could enhance use of the foreshore access system. Specifi c locations should be assessed and determined through site specifi c consultation and design.

Boating access to the water is an important use that needs to be supported by specialised facilities such as boat ramps and storage facilities. Tunks Park has a boat launching ramp that is well utilised and is complemented with car and boat trailer parking. Other boat launching facilities are also provided at Milson Park, Quibaree Park and Blues Point Reserve. Formal boat storage facilities are currently available at Quibaree Park and Willoughby Street, Careening Cove. Due to the limited availability of formal boat / dinghy storage facilities, informal storage occurs across many areas. These points are generally focused to areas adjoining boat moorings, where water access is relatively easily achieved.

Toilet facilities to Berry Island

Playground - Berry Island

Playground - Kesterton Park

Formal storage facility - Quibaree Park

Willoughby Street boatshed

Informal dinghy storage

April 2007


3.0 ACCESS MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

3.1 GenerallyThe Access Management Framework has been compiled to provide a basis for decision making related to planning, implementation, and management of access to the foreshore. The Framework has informed the development of the access hierarchy, the access plan, and the review of staging strategies.

It is aimed that the Framework will provide an ongoing tool for access decision making.

3.2 Management ObjectivesThe Access Strategy refl ects and responds to a series of fundamental objectives resolved from past planning and consultation for the foreshores and integration with the Sharing Sydney Harbour Plan (refer Appendix 7.1). Listed below are overall objectives for foreshore access planning, implementation, and management

Environmental Sustainability• Biodiversity values are protected and enhanced where appropriate including core

habitat areas, corridors, and unstable or sensitive ecosystems• Access via public transport is encouraged, and a network for pedestrian /cycle

movement that facilitates and encourages non-vehicular transport is provided Social Sustainability• Path connections for pedestrian / cycle access link the foreshore and adjoining

communities, incorporating continuous foreshore access to areas where environmental and socially sustainable and of demonstrable community benefi t

• The access network provides for usage at a variety of levels and abilities from fi tness and training to family recreation.

• Community involvement in ongoing access management Diversity• A variety of visual, environmental, and recreational experiences is afforded by an

access network catering to a wide range of capabilities

Social Equity• Access for people with disabilities to the foreshore is maximised whilst limiting

adverse visual or environmental impacts• Foreshore access provides a balance between community needs and values and

private residential amenity and values

• Regional usage of major foreshore open spaces is recognised in access provision

Responsiveness• Access facilities can adapt to changing social and economic infl uences and

recreational trends as feasible without impact on other foreshore values



3.3 Access Management FrameworkThe Access Management Framework following has been compiled from study team review and investigations along with outcomes of meetings with Councillors, Council staff and the Access Management Community Workshop held in June 2006.

The Framework following aims to provide the background to decision making and problem solving contained in the Access Strategy.

The Framework presents information under the following headings:

Management objectives aims of foreshore access management

Management issues problems to be addressed or opportunities to be optimised

Management strategies proposed response to the identifi ed issues

Detailed actions actions arising in planning, implementation and management of access

Please remove this page & insert A3 Access Management Framework

April 2007



3.4 Walking Tracks SystemWalking tracks are one of the most common facilities within open space areas and occur across a range of landscapes, to suit a variety of users, and are managed by a number of different authorities. Walking tracks form one of the principal components of the foreshore access network in North Sydney.

The Australian Standard AS 2156 - 2001 Walking Tracks, aims to provide a unifi ed approach to planning, implementation, and management of walking tracks with the stated objectives of providing:‘... management authorities with guidance for walking track classifi cation and signage in order to provide consistency of information to users of walking tracks. This is intended to minimise risk, preserve natural features and enhance recreation opportunities associated with the use of walking tracks.’

The Standard defi nes a series of categories of access which each identify specifi c requirements for:- surface treatment- width- path gradient / accessibility

As Council implements access improvement and management works, it should review applicable categories to individual track systems and apply the appropriate design criteria. Council may also consider ongoing mapping of these categorisations as works are implemented.

A summary of these is listed following.

Description of track

Class 1 “All Access Track”

Class 2 “Graded Track”

Class 3 “Walking Track”

Class 4 “Hiking Track”

Class 5 “Marked Route”

Class 6 “Unmarked Route”

Surface Hard surface suitable for wheel chair access e.g. concrete, asphalt, paver, timber boardwalk

Generally a hard surface dependent on level of usage e.g. concrete, asphalt, bitumen, pavers, boardwalk

Generally a modifi ed surface e.g. bitumen, gravel, mulch, board & chain

Distinct surface often without major modifi cation e.g. gravel, mulch, natural surface

Limited modifi cation to natural surface and track alignment may be indistinct in places

No modifi cation of the natural environmenteg. Wilderness Areas

Width Constant 1200-2000mm

Constant 900-1800mm

Variable 400-1200mm

Variable 600mm max

N/A N/A

Path Gradient / Access Requirements

Compliant with AS1428 Design for Access and Mobility (refer general requirements page)

1:10 max gradient

Minimal steps

No steeper than 1:10 preferred but may exceed this gradient for short lengths dependent on soil stability

Steps may be common

Limited by environmental and maintenance considerations

May include steep sections of unmodifi ed surfaces

Likely to include steep sections of unmodifi ed surfaces

Example Very high use track with links to accessible facilities eg. Cremorne Point

Very high use tracks located adjoining focal points, lookouts eg. Lavender Bay

High use tracks in high visitation areas eg. BP Waverton

Medium use tracks in high visitation areas, high use tracks in low visitation areas eg. Gore Cove

Low use Occasional use routes



3.5 Review of Access StrategiesThere are a number of strategies that must play a role in the ongoing enhancement and management of foreshore access in North Sydney. All of these exist currently at locations around the LGA’s shoreline. The Foreshore Access Strategy aims to defi ne the role of these strategies as part of the overall access system and to apply a consistent set of parameters in terms of function, design, and management (refer 4.2 Elements of the Access System and related design principles).

3.5.1 Upgrade Existing AccessWhile there is a fundamental need and desirability to address ‘missing links’ in the overall access system as most appropriate, it is also important to maintain and improve access where required for safety, experiential quality, or other compliance with Standards.

Availability of resources will require that priorities balanced between addressing missing linkages and upgrading existing links. Criteria for high priority upgrade works may include:- potential to support other accessible facilities- improve access to public transport or accessible recreation areas- link to access routes of universal accessibilityGenerally upgrade works should respond to design and materials requirements for the applicable track category.

3.5.2 New TracksNew tracks will be designed and implemented to address missing links and to improve access to existing tracks and paths. While the Access Plans (Section 5.0) identify generally where new links are required, each of these must be subject to a comprehensive design process including:- detailed site appraisal- community consultation- designThis is to ensure that each project most effectively meets community needs and integrates as many complementary open space objectives (ie. is multi objective) and feasible eg. bushland management, erosion, maintenance effectiveness.

Design and materials will respond to the applicable track category.

3.5.3 Open Grassed RoutesAccess to a number of locations along the foreshore, is formed by maintained grassed areas without a defi ned track route. Often these may be distinctive open spaces (eg. in bay heads) that link areas of bushland track and / or on road path links. As such these connections are an important component of the foreshore access network.

The grassed links offer a variation in walking surface and offer a more open perspective of the Harbour. Generally the Access Plans recommend that grassed links are retained ‘as is’, to conserve the diversity they provide and the specifi c foreshore park character they contribute to.

In examining the functionality of many of these connections, access objectives in isolation may suggest that it is desirable to formalise some links to enhance universal access or better direct access. While this may be appropriate in the future in certain cases, generally the existing open grass character is an important aspect of the identity and landscape qualities of these open spaces. In addition the open spaces may support active or passive recreational opportunities that may be compromised by the incursion of path access. As such based on current usage and open space objectives the Access Plans do not recommend any existing grassed links for formalisation.

Balls Head Road

Balls Head Reserve lookout area

Kurraba Point Reserve

Blues Point

April 2007


3.5.4 Links Adjoining Privately Owned ForeshoresGenerally missing links in the overall foreshore access network will fall into one of four scenarios in terms of land ownership:i. smaller residential allotments under individual private ownershipii. larger private or public sites subject to residential developmentiii. larger private sites or previously closed public lands that are expected to transition

to public useiv. State / Federally owned land (Kirribilli House etc.)For type iii, Council can anticipate that public open space and related access provision will be implemented in the future (eg. HMAS Platypus in Neutral Bay).

For types i and ii, Council must pursue opportunities to provide foreshore access as feasible to the specifi c site. This may include the following (refer also to 3.5.5 Intertidal Access):Dedicated open spaceWhere large foreshore properties are subject to redevelopment, Council and State Government planning controls may require the developer to provide dedicated open space to the foreshore frontage for the purposes of public recreation and access. Key requirements for dedicated open space include:- Provide minimum width of 20 metres of public land on larger sites (5m width

target to individual lots) to enable realisation of multiple public objectives (riparian enhancement along with revegetation) and access provision where compatible with environmental objectives. In addition, adequate width is required to promote a sense of public domain.

- Design of the foreshore open space must be undertaken in coordination with adjoining development planning and design to ensure elements complement and support each other in a sustainable manner (for example tree planting integrated with view corridor provision for buildings, pedestrian access through working waterfront sites etc).

- Generally, whilst it is noted that the total foreshore access is a combination of experiences, accessways where provided should recognise that direct alignment adjacent the waters edge is preferable, as long as it does not adversely impact on other requirements eg. access to certain zones (eg. natural foreshore edge with high habitat value) could be set back from the edge to promote conservation values.

Rights of wayWhere privately owned land directly adjoins the mean high water mark without public open space provision, and where missing links to access have been identifi ed as a priority, rights of way for public access may be considered. This will involve a managed / controlled access way of limited width that achieves access (generally over a short distance) between two means of important access continuity.

Rights of way are subject to legal negotiation and formalisation which must consider maintenance and management responsibilities for the access, and the relationship of access to adjoining uses (and related mitigation of impacts).

Typical application of rights of way may include ‘working waterfronts’ where maritime related activities require design mechanisms which permit safe public access across the waterfront whilst avoiding adverse impacts on site operations. These situations may include gated controls which enable management of work related access, and control public access at these times.


Open space to the front of Wondakiah

Right of way between Wondakiah and Horace Street steps

Potential operating mode for working waterfront site Berrys BaySource: Berrys Bay Waverton Foreshore Access Clouston, October 2004


Rights of way (continued)Generally design or provision of rights of way should aim to provide a width of 2-5 metres, with alignment as close to the foreshore as possible. The access paths through rights of way should be comprised of materials that match adjoining paths, and provision of security control fencing or barriers should be considered to defi ne edges to private lands. The use of level changes is also an effective way to defi ne private / public land.

BoardwalksBoardwalks are raised structures that provide elevated access generally over a short distance to address gaps in land based access. Typically the limited examples of boardwalks in North Sydney are water based structures located within the intertidal zone. At Berry Island an on grade deck structure also exemplifi es the benefi ts and potential of boardwalks to control, direct, and continue land based access.

Water based boardwalks offer very limited long term access potential due to:- visual impacts (from land and water)- potential for environmental impacts- high capital and recurrent maintenance costsIt is recommended that alternative mechanisms for access are pursued, with water based boardwalks considered where no alternative access provision can be provided.

It is also noted that generally NSW Maritime does not support water based boardwalks because:- high capital cost- high maintenance cost- impact on adjoining private land holders.

In any situation where Council may consider a waterbased boardwalk (ie. below mean high water mark) NSW Maritime compliance is required before the structure can proceed. As such it is unlikely that such structures would be supported by NSW Maritime unless specifi c justifi cation could be provided that this was the only viable option and that identifi ed core issues could be addressed. Nevertheless, meeting these criteria does not guarantee that a structure would be supported.

3.5.5 Intertidal AccessMany parts of the Harbour foreshore are fl anked by sandy beaches or rock platforms that potentially afford temporary access at low tide at varying degrees of diffi culty. Where these foreshore are not of signifi cant habitat value or environmentally sensitive, provision of intertidal access may be an appropriate solution to foreshore under private ownership or to public foreshores where the land based access is otherwise problematic.

Rights of way across jetty access may be required which might include provision of steps or other mechanisms.

Generally pursuit of intertidal access will be focused on high priority missing links between open spaces or major foreshore connections due to the long term proposition of lease review and jetty consolidation. The exception may be foreshores where limited private jetty access exists, but continuity of public access at low tide could be achieved.

Due to the diffi culty of access over the intertidal zone, these must be effectively signposted. Management and liability controls must be resolved between Council and NSW Maritime. Council will liaise with NSW Maritime for the ongoing implementation of these connections.


Boardwalk - Neutral Bay

Boardwalk - Berrys Bay


Intertidal access to the front of private development to Neutral Bay

April 2007


3.5.6 Roadside LinksRoadside links through footpaths to street corridors are a fundamental and highly signifi cant part of the function and character of foreshore access in North Sydney. The roadside path network provides important connections between open space based access and also affords wonderful framed views of the Harbour in its urban context that are a signifi cant part of the ‘Sydney Harbour’ experience.

It is important that these views are identifi ed and recognised for integration into planning controls that will confi rm their conservation in any ongoing redevelopment of the foreshores, and in potential management / maintenance requirements for private revegetation.

In addition it is appropriate that roadside links that connect access of high categorisation and related importance be considered for potential upgrading in terms of width, surfacing, and amenity shade tree planting. Further it is vital that coordinated wayfi nding signage integrates roadside path links with the broader foreshore access system, destinations and public transport.

3.5.7 Craft AccessAncillary to walking access to the foreshore is physical storage and launching access for water based recreation. Primarily this includes:- dinghies for private vessel access- kayaks and canoesLarger craft access is formed on boat ramps and is not considered in this study. The informal storage of dinghies and other craft is of concern at some locations where access to the foreshore and launching are a cause of environmental degradation.

In addition, in some cases the cluttered informal storage of dinghies has an undesirable visual impact, while conversely in several bays where concentrations are not excessive, and shores are heavily vegetated - the informal character of storage is attractive and appropriate.

As such, storage and formalisation of storage through lockers or racks must be agreed site specifi cally. Council will pursue opportunities to provide storage to existing structures (such as at Quibaree Park). In some areas launching is problematic and would benefi t from some form of formalisation by steps, pontoons etc.


Shirley Road footpath

Boat ramp -Tunks Park

Informal dinghy storage - Folly Point

Boat storage at Careening Cove

April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Based on the preceding strategies a hierarchy has been resolved for access improvements to the foreshores of North Sydney that responds to the key areas of access need, and establishes the means for coordinating planning and design and materials treatments across the foreshore access system.

Design principles have been developed which aim to facilitate an appropriate level of coordination to access planning in which common goals and approaches can be implemented as site specifi c design responses.

Specifi c design and materials principles including references to relevant design standards are provided for the proposed access hierarchy in section 4.2. In section 4.1 below, general principles derived from the Access Management Framework and which will apply across all access components are summarised.

4.1 General Principles

Environmental Sustainability• Access planning implementation and management must ensure that the principles

and function of habitat corridors and nodes are supported through the access system

• Use access system to direct and control public use of the foreshore in a way that minimises unsustainable impacts on biodiversity values whilst optimising interpretation and enjoyment of those values

• Align access outside habitat corridors as a preferred approach• Use access to provide a buffer / barrier between maintained landscape areas and

natural vegetation zones• Monitor impacts of existing access where in proximity to sensitive habitat areas• Consider alternative access (eg alternative route or raised boardwalk access) or

removal of access to areas of unsustainable impact• Access planning to provide linkages between transport nodes and foreshore

destination reserves and access links• Tracks and paths to appropriately refl ect their function and role through width

and surfacing• Improve wayfi nding and interpretation of natural and cultural values through a

coordinated signage approach• Access system to optimise safety and security of users along trails and particularly

through isolated areas - as such maintain clear sight lines and a cleared / maintained corridor along isolated alignments where appropriate

• Consider potential for phased upgrade of existing access routes to enhance use• Provide ongoing monitoring to review usage levels, and confi rm priorities

Social Sustainability• Access planning to provide an integrated system of access of a variety of levels

that: - links public transport to destination foreshore open spaces and foreshore

access corridors - links residential precincts to destination foreshore open spaces and

foreshore access corridors• Connections enabling continuous foreshore access are developed as a priority• Role of intertidal access optimised where sustainable• Track surfaces and design must be maintenance effective• Access design and materials must consider whole of life maintenance and integrate

design life cycle factors in decision making• Address missing links through the most sustainable and effective implementation

strategy for the specifi c site• Involve community through coordinated liaison and interaction with organised

walking groups


Social Equity• The access system will optimise the extent of the access network that is accessible

to all users as appropriate • Consider potential for phased upgrade of existing access routes to enhance use

and accessibility • Review all missing links on the basis of their community benefi t • Provision of access paths and facilities to cater for users at both a local and visitor

level• Improve relationship and function of public transport in servicing foreshore

access• Conserve important harbour views from access network

Responsiveness• Access structures shall have regard for an appropriate lifecycle design recognising

the potential for future changes to access needs to the foreshore• Where possible adaptability and fl exibility should be built into planning and

implementation• The access network will provide linkages from the public transport network to the

foreshore• Access design to be responsive to community need - whilst shared use routes

may be practical and necessary (resources), usage patterns to be monitored to review need / potential to split pedestrian and cycle access to enhance function and enjoyment for users

• Access directs users to points of interest, and links these points and related recreational facilities and amenity

4.2 Elements of the Access Hierarchy and related Design PrinciplesThe following principles detail functional, planning, design, materials and management principles proposed to apply to each component of the access hierarchy.

Generally these should be considered in precinct planning design other than where clear rationale to diverge from the coordinated approach is identifi ed and approved by Council.

4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

All Access Track (Class 1)Defi nitionMajor pedestrian access track. Usage- Landings required to grades in excess of 1v:33h- Handrail required to grades in excess of 1v:19h- Recreational walking track linking to destination

facilities- Track alignment providing scenic experience and

appreciation of foreshore views- Access provision for all ability levels- Local pedestrian (loop) access- Fitness / training use

Design principles• Implemented as long term high use pedestrian

access path• Hard surfaced pedestrian path• Will link local area park entries with major destination

facilities in the access system• Mark with major entry wayfi nding and interpretive

signage• Short duration before linkages with destinations,

loop and shared access (15 minutes = 1.5km)• Link to access system to adjoining streets• Use to define maintained grassed areas where

possible for maintenance effectiveness

Relevant Standards:• AS 2156 Walking Tracks - Class 1

Maintenance• Long term design life for design and materials

treatments• Regular checking of path surfacing for cracks or other

defl ections in accordance with Council’s site specifi c requirements

Design requirements

Width: 1200 - 1800mm consistent width

Grade: Compliant with AS 2124:- not to exceed 1v:14h- landings required in excess of 1v:33h- handrail required in excess of 1v:19h- alternative ramped access where steps occur- tactile surface indicators (TGSI’s) required

Alignment: See Design Principles

Materials: Exposed aggregate concrete or Asphalt, or paved surface

Boardwalk / deck option to match path width to sensitive land areas

Handrails: eff fall height > 3.0 = Type A(as per AS 2156) eff fall height > 1.5 = Type A eff fall height > 1.0 = Type B

4.2.1 Walking Tracks (AS 2156)


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Walking Path (Class 2)Defi nitionSecondary pedestrian access track linking to other access loops.

Usage- recreational walking track linking to destination

facilities- track alignment providing scenic experience and

appreciation of foreshore views- access provision for most ability levels- local pedestrian (loop) access- Fitness / training use

Design principles• Implemented as long term moderate use pedestrian

access path• Hard surfaced pedestrian path• Links to other access paths• Mark with secondary wayfi nding and interpretive

signage• Moderate duration before linkages with destinations,

loop and shared access (25 minutes - 2.5km)• Use to define maintained grassed areas where

possible for maintenance effectiveness


Maintenance• Long to medium term design life for design and

materials treatments• Regular checking of path surfacing for cracks or other


Design requirements

Width: 900 - 1200mm consistent width

Grade: Max grade - 1v:10h Minimise steps


Materials: Exposed aggregate concrete or asphalt


Handrails: eff fall height > 3.0 = Type A(as per AS 2156) eff fall height > 1.5 = Type B eff fall height > 1.0 = Type C


April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Walking Track (Class 3)Defi nitionSecondary pedestrian access track linking to other track components of the access system - typically within bushland areas.

Usage- recreational walking track- track alignment providing scenic experience and

appreciation of natural environment- access provision for able bodied walkers- local pedestrian (loop) access- Fitness / training use

Design principles• Implemented as medium term moderate to low use

pedestrian access path• Stabilised surfaced pedestrian path with hard surface

where required to erodible areas• Links to other walking tracks and access loops • Mark with low key wayfinding and interpretive

signage• Apply design strategies and control measures to limit

use by trail bikes and mountain bikes• Moderate to long duration before linkages with

destinations, loop and shared access (60 minutes = 6km)


Maintenance• Short to medium term design life for design and

materials treatments• Regular checking of path surfacing for cracks or other


Design requirements

Width: 500-1200mm variable width

Grade: No steeper than - 1v:10h preferred but acceptable in short lengths dependant on soil stability

Steps may be common


Materials: Asphalt or Exposed agg concrete to erodible sections

Stabilised gravel

Crushed sandstone


Handrails: eff fall height > 3.0 = Type C(as per AS 2156) eff fall height > 1.5 = Type C eff fall height > 1.0 = Type D



4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Hiking Track (Class 4)Defi nitionMinor walking access link. Generally linking to higher level walking track access.

Usage- low level usage recreational walking track linking to

minor park features and hard to access areas- access provision for experienced walkers only

Design principles• Implemented as long term low use pedestrian access

path• Links to walking tracks and walking paths• Avoid linkages to cycle use tracks• Mark with minor wayfinding and interpretive

signage• Apply design strategies and control measures to limit

use by trail bikes and mountain bikes• Moderate to long duration before linkages with

destinations, loop and shared access (60 minutes = 4-5km)


Maintenance• Short to medium term design life for design and

materials treatments• Regular checking of path surfacing for erosion and

other disturbance

Design requirements

Width: 750 mm max variable width

Grade: Variable within limitations of soil stability

Steps may be common


Materials: Distinct surface often without major modifi cation eg gravel / natural soil

Handrails: eff fall height > 3.0 = None(as per AS 2156) eff fall height > 1.5 = Type D eff fall height > 1.0 = Type C


April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Defi nitionHigh use routes that facilitate both cycle and pedestrian access, as well as providing maintenance / authorised vehicle access.

Usage- Local cycle (loop) access- Local pedestrian (loop) access- Fitness / training use- Recurrent maintenance access (light vehicle)

Design principles• Implemented as one of several options as main

access:i Multiple use trail - single path surface catering for

multiple usesii Divided cycle and pedestrian trails• Hard surfaced cycle / pedestrian path• Locate alignment as close as possible to major

destination facilities• Locate as close as possible to major entry / access

points and carparking facilities• Locate as close as possible to toilet and water

amenities at regular intervals along route• Mark with major wayfinding and interpretive

signage• Possible role as part of recurrent maintenance access

(maximum small rigid truck loading)• Possible role as part of designated emergency access

routes (structural design for loadings above small rigid truck)

iii Consider visual / spatial impact of larger width paths to foreshore open space

iv Integrate provision for ‘family cycling’ - low speed parent and children use where possible (eg. private local loops)

Relevant Standards• Austroads 14 Bicycles• AS 2156 Walking Tracks - Class 1




Design requirements

Width: Refer Figure 6-19 Austroads Part 14 Bicycles

Grade: Generally 1v:25h max over 140m max

Alignment: Dual use & cycle only: min radius 50m

Materials: - Asphalt or concrete - Boardwalk to match path width (requires 1.2-1.4m handrails for

drops over 1.0m)

4.2.2 Shared Use Trails

SCENARIO OVERALL WIDTH OF

PATH

PREDOMINANT PATH PURPOSEtypical circumstances of use

A 2.0m Commuting & local access- constrained conditions- ‘tidal fl ow’- low use

B 2.5m Commuting & local access- regular use- 20 km/h

C 3.0m Commuting- frequent & concurrent use

in both directions- 30 km/h+

D 3.0m Recreation- regular use- 20 km/h

E 3.5m Commuting & recreation (concurrent)- frequent & concurrent use

in both directions- 30 km/h+

F 4.0m Major recreational path- 20 km/h- heavy & concurrent use in

both directions

Extract from Figure 6-19 Shared Use Path OperationSource: Austroads Part 14 Bicycles


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Defi nitionAn important component of the foreshore access system incorporating on street footpaths.

Usage- Local pedestrian (loop) access- Fitness / training use- Connections to and between open space based

access

Design principles• High level of pedestrian amenity provided through

street trees and other appropriate landscape treatments

• Hard surfaced pedestrian path• Coordinate design / materials with access system and

adjoining streets• Mark with wayfi nding signage to identify appropriate

foreshore routes

Relevant Standards:• Austroads Part 13• AS 1428 Design for Access & Mobility




Design requirements

Width: Preferably 1500mm and above

Grade: Aim to comply with AS 1428

Alignment: N/A

Materials: Concrete

4.2.3 Footpaths adjoining roads

April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Defi nitionLow impact access surface for sensitive on grade situations. Use of boardwalks to ‘over water’ situations to Sydney Harbour is not supported by NSW Maritime.

Usage- Access links to steep topography- Access links to sensitive areas

Design principles• Locate to control access to sensitive habitat areas• Locate to minimise disturbance of steep or erosion

prone ground

Relevant Standards:• Building Code of Australia• Review standards applicable to access to which

boardwalk connects


treatments• Regular checking for cracks or other deflections

in accordance with Council ’s s ite specif ic requirements

Design requirements

Width: To match adjoining path systems

Grade: To comply with adjoining path systems and the level of disabled accessibility applicable

Alignment: N/A

Materials: Hardwood / steel decking with timber or steel frame

4.2.4 Boardwalks


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Defi nitionGrassed areas to parks and other foreshore open spaces through which foreshore access routes pass, connecting other forms of access links.

Usage- Connection between path access- Connections between paths and street public

domain

Design principles• Maximise width to reduce potential for formation of

‘goat tracks’• Generally avoid formalisation (eg hard surface)

unless based on sound usage principles and where of sustainable visual and functional impact to open space

Relevant Standards:• Not applicable

Maintenance• Subject to general park maintenance

Design requirements

Width: Not applicable

Grade: Generally under 1:4 for maintenance Aim to provide disabled suitable grades when linking paths catering for disabled access

Alignment: Preferably wide zones to minimise development of goat tracks

Materials: Not applicable

4.2.5 Grassed Access Links

April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Defi nitionPotential land dedications to private development sites to provide for public foreshore access.

Usage- To link public access- To provide access to the foreshore (eg steps and

dinghy launching)

Design principles• Integrate with environmental objectives for

foreshore• Consider setting back from foreshore in some areas

to enable foreshore (overhanging) vegetation• Consider stepped levels from foreshore to boundary

of private space to reinforce public / private boundary and enhance private views over public foreshore

Relevant Standards:• Standards as applicable to adjoining areas

Maintenance• Land dedication subject to recurrent Council

maintenance• Community title areas subject to maintenance by

owner group

Design requirements

Width: Preferably minimum 15 metres up to 30-35 metres

Grade: To integrate with maximum grades of adjoining path systems Alignment: Between development and foreshore

Materials: Path treatments should match and integrate with adjoining open space

4.2.6 Dedicated Open Space


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Defi nitionUse of natural foreshores at low tide to provide access across privately owned foreshores.

Usage- To provide linkages between publicly owned

foreshores spaces in front of privately owned land.

Design principles• To be undertaken under direction and coordination

of NSW Maritime• Subject to environmental assessment for sensitive

foreshore ecology• Consider means of negotiating jetties and other

obstructions• Provide appropriate signage regarding usage

limitations

Relevant Standards:• NSW Maritime requirements

Maintenance• Monitor for environmental and other impacts

Design requirements

Width: Not applicable

Grade: Not applicable

Alignment: To minimise impacts on private residential security and amenity

Materials: Not applicable

4.2.7 Intertidal Access

April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Dinghy Storage & LaunchingDefi nition

Facilities providing for access to the water by dinghies and associated storage for craft.

Usage

- Mooring owners- Local boat owners / users

Design principles:

• Implemented as formal facilities where impacts of informal access and storage are causing erosion / compaction etc.

• Formal facilities implemented (ie racks or storage) where intensity of use is high

• Informal facilities maintained where use is not creating negative environmental or visual impacts

• Utilise existing structures (eg wharves / jetties) where possible

• Locate launching facilities with practical vehicle access as appropriate

• Locate as close to carparking areas where appropriate

• Locate adjoining track / path access

• Mark major facilities with major wayfinding signage

• Mark informal facilities with low level wayfi nding signage as appropriate

Relevant Standards:• Occupational Health and Safety requirements


treatments• Regular checking of intensity of use to monitor

impacts of informal areas

Design requirements

Surfacing: Crushed sandstone / stabilised gravel Timber or steel runners for transition

Materials: Galvanised steel racks

4.2.8 Craft Access


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

Kayak Storage & LaunchingDefi nition

Facilities providing for access to the water by dinghies and associated storage for craft.

Usage

- Kayak owners for exercise / recreational use

Design principles:

• Implemented as formal facilities where impacts of informal access and storage are causing erosion / compaction etc.

• Formal facilities implemented where intensity of use is high and visual impact is manageable

• Informal facilities maintained where use is not creating negative environmental impacts

• Utilise existing structures (eg wharves / jetties) where possible

• Integrate with launching facilities or appropriate natural edge for safe launching

• Locate adjoining track / path access

• Mark major facilities with major wayfinding signage

• Mark informal facilities with low level wayfi nding signage as appropriate

Design requirements

Materials: Running rail with wearing surface (eg crushed sandstone or gravel) to base

Racks to areas where visual impact is manageable

Relevant Standards:• Occupational Health and Safety requirements


treatments• Regular checking of intensity of use to monitor

impacts of informal areas

4.2.9 Craft Access

April 2007


4.0 ACCESS SYSTEM

4.3 Material FinishesThe following summary identifi es the preferred materials treatments as outlined in the descriptions of the preceding elements of the trail hierarchy.

ConcreteConcrete provides an attractive path treatment, that is particularly suited to areas of intense use. Concrete fi nishes should be consistent with surrounding pavements (broomed, exposed aggregate etc.).

AsphaltAsphalt paths are a highly cost effective path treatment that can be used in a number of situations. Asphalt is a particularly successful material for utilisation in bushland areas as it comfortably sits within bushland landscapes.

Asphalt will generally be laid on a stabilised basecourse with edge restraints.

BoardwalkTimber, steel, precast concrete, or recycled plastic boardwalks are suitable for pedestrian access. Cycle access to boardwalks can only be in a low speed environment and is generally not suitable on steel or recycled plastic surfaces due to slip potential.

Stabilised GravelStabilised decomposed granite gravel is likely to be used as a drainable surface alternative to hard pavements to pedestrian areas. Consideration needs to be given for slopes and drainage to avoid erosion of gravel pavements.

Crushed SandstoneCrushed sandstone is preferred to stabilised granite gravel to lower priority pedestrian / walking trails due to its fi ner compaction / texture, and inert nature with required to native vegetation impacts. Regard needs to be given for slopes and drainage to avoid erosion of crushed sandstone pavements.

Soil TracksInsitu soil tracks formed and maintained by regular use will occur as secondary / tertiary level of walking track access for temporary (short term) access provision, and some maintenance access routes. This surface needs to be maintained for erosion / gullying and can be supplemented by an overlay of crushed sandstone.

Crushed sandstone

Asphalt pavement

Soil track

Stabilised gravel

Steel boardwalk

Concrete

April 2007


5.0 ACCESS PLAN

5.1 GenerallyThe Access Plan has been developed to identify the key missing links in the existing access system. In the preparation of the Plan, the study has also reviewed the existing foreshore access through mapping and on site reviews. From this review a series of issues and opportunities have been outlined for detailed sections of the access system. These opportunities are further examined and prioritised in Section 6.0 Implementation, which establishes specifi c areas for which access improvements are a priority.

5.2 The Access PlanThe Access Plan on the following page, identifi es the overall elements of the foreshore access system across North Sydney. Further detailed precinct plans are also provided following highlighting the issues and opportunities to individual areas.

A strong community desire has been for the provision of continuous foreshore access, although the access system may in reality be less frequently used for this type of broad ranging pedestrian activity. While the precincts developed following may not be linked in all areas by open space / foreshore connections, continuous access is possible by on road footpath links, which are recognised as an important component of the North Sydney foreshore access system.

Please remove this page & insert A3 Overall Access Plan

April 2007


5.2 The Access Plans

5.2.1 Gore Cove - Area 1

5.2.2 Balls Head Bay - Area 2

5.2.3 Berrys Bay - Area 3

5.2.4 Lavender Bay - Area 4

5.2.5 Milsons Point to Kirribilli - Area 5

5.2.6 Careening Cove - Area 6

5.2.7 Neutral Bay - Area 7

5.2.8 Shell Cove - Area 8

5.2.9 Mosman Bay - Area 9

5.2.10 Middle Harbour - Willoughby and Long Bay - Area 10

5.0 ACCESS PLAN



EXISTING ACCESSThe existing foreshore access to Gore Cove generally commences from the transport node of Wollstonecraft Station or the major vehicular access route of Shirley Road. Shirley Road is also a major pedestrian route with footpaths generally to both sides of the street with high pedestrian amenity provided by tree canopy to grassed verges. Shirley road terminates at Berry Island Reserve, providing a direct route to the harbour foreshore.

Two bushwalks are provided within Gore Cove, the fi rst is the Gore Cove Track which begins from Smoothey Park, travels through Gore Reserve and connects to Shirley Road opposite Badangi Reserve. From this point the footpath connects pedestrians to Berry Island Reserve. A second bushwalk, the Gadyan Track, is provided around the Berry Island headland. Along the Gore Cove Track there is a connection point to Vista Street, Lane Cove which then provides further foreshore access to Holloway Park in Lane Cove. There is also a bridge connection from Smoothey Park into Lane Cove (St Giles Avenue).

There are only a few points where water access is available within Gore Cove and these are not formalised and do not appear to be highly used. There is however informal dinghy storage occurring adjoining the Fisheries site on Shirley Road.

The access system within Gore Cove comprises a number of materials or access types including the following:• Informal dirt or soil tracks to the Gore Cove Track and Gadyan Track• Sections of timber boardwalk to the Gore Cove Track and Gadyan Track• Asphalt paths to Smoothey Park• On street concrete footpaths, predominantly with grassed verge and tree planting

PRESSURES• Bush tracks and much of the footpath access is not suitable for disabled access due to the steep topography of the

area. The rough surface of the bush tracks also inhibits suitability for disabled access.• High commuter use of Smoothey Park access paths as commuter link to and from Wollstonecraft Station.• Potential problem of lighting levels to Smoothey Park as commuter access connection.• The footpath to Russell Street adjoining Smoothey Park is on the opposite side of the street posing a potential safety

issue in crossing the road.• Potential residential encroachment onto bushland area to Shirley Road (head of Gore Cove Track).• Limited access to water.• Limited dinghy storage given number of moorings in Gore Cove (43).

OPPORTUNITIESThere are limited opportunities to improve foreshore access to Gore Cove as the level of access provided currently is generally appropriate given the topography and nature of the area. There is also greater water access opportunities currently available within Balls Head Bay. Some potential improvement strategies include:• Investigate design opportunity for path upgrade to Russell Street to improve grade / accessibility• Potential to upgrade pathways through Smoothey Park to shared pedestrian / cycleways to accommodate commuter

access• Improve lighting to Smoothey Park to provide safer commuter route to Wollstonecraft Station.• Potential for future access across existing residential properties and Fisheries site if redevelopment of these properties

was to occur, providing extension of Gore Cove Track access to Berry Island, and water access.• Investigate opportunities to implement formalised pedestrian crossings to Russell Street and River Road.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Wollstonecraft Station & Shirley Road Bridge connection to Lane CoveSmoothey Park asphalt pathway

April 2007



Gadyan Track - Berry Island

Gore Cove Track - Shirley Road

Informal dinghy storage adjoining Fisheries site - Shirley Road

5.0 ACCESS PLAN



EXISTING ACCESSBalls Head Bay is generally well served by a diverse range of foreshore access opportunities. From the eastern side of Berry Island, continuous foreshore access is achieved up to the Horace Street steps adjoining the HMAS Waterhen site. However access through Oyster Cove Reserve essentially feels quite private as it adjoins the large development estate of Wondakiah. Similarly a small access connection is provided at Bridge End which also feels very private as it is enclosed by adjoining development but provides an important local access connection into Badangi Reserve. From the Horace Street steps, there is limited access connections to the Coal Loader with no formal footpath to the western side of Balls Head Road. A shared access road provides a loop around Balls Head, providing the initial access to the many bush tracks that traverse the headland reserve.

Intertidal and water access is provided at several locations including the beach area to Badangi Reserve that is well utilised by local residents. There are also a areas to the tracks of both Berry Island and Balls Head that provide glimpses of the water and in some areas the terrain is such that access to the water is possible. Informal kayak and dinghy storage currently occurs to the bottom of the Horace Street steps, a small stone jetty is also available for public use at the foot of the Ross Street steps.

Materials and access types to Balls Head include:• Informal dirt or soil tracks to the bushwalks of Berry Island, Badangi Reserve and Balls Head Reserve. The rough nature

of these tracks prevents disabled access in these areas.• Deck areas to Oyster Cove Reserve.• Intertidal beach access.• Steep concrete steps to Horace Street and other areas of more informal stone steps.• On street concrete footpath access with varying levels of pedestrian amenity.• Asphalt paths• On street gravel paths

PRESSURES• Due to the steep topography of the area disabled access is not widely available.• The viewing area to the Horace Street termination does not provide a high level of amenity or accessibility.• The footpath connection adjoining the HMAS Waterhen site is of poor quality.• The tracks and facilities (lookouts etc) provided in Balls Head Reserve are degraded.

OPPORTUNITIES• Wayfi nding signage to better identify public access to Oyster Cove Reserve. Landscape improvements to integrate

public access link with typical open space / public domain character.• Signage at railway stations to identify access to foreshore system.• Orientation point at junction of Balls Head Road and Horace Street as key access marker to Coal Loader, BP site, Balls

Head Reserve and Gore Cove, incorporating distances to key destinations.• Provision of improved viewing area to Horace Street capitalising on existing views to Iron Cove and Balmain.• Provision of formalised footpath to western side of Balls Head Road and improved crossing facilities / amenity in

conjunction with landscape works currently under implementation.• Potential for unifi ed path treatment / connection from HMAS Waterhen to Coal Loader. Further development of this

access connection may incorporate an identifi able / consistent path treatment including landscaping to connect Coal Loader, BP site and Balls Head as an important open space loop.

• Development of Coal Loader site will provide new open space and access opportunities, including north-south pathway through the Coal Loader site linking to Balls Head Bushland tracks, harbour access link stairs from upper terrace of Coal Loader to the harbour’s edge. Also facilities to be developed as part of NSW Maritime as part of the redevelopment of the Coal Loader Wharf including pedestrian access to top deck, and publicly accessible lower level dinghy and kayak storage and launching area.

• Review shared access effectiveness to Balls Head Drive and implement further pedestrian safety measures if required.

• Maintenance and upgrade works to Balls Head Reserve to improve quality and usability of existing access.• Maintenance works required to Badangi Track.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

April 2007



5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Horace Street steps

Informal dinghy and kayak storage to Horace Street steps

Access through Oyster Cove Reserve


5.2.3 Berrys Bay - Area 3EXISTING ACCESSBerrys Bay is currently afforded with a high percentage of foreshore open space. However along the eastern foreshore access is not continuous, and water access points are limited. To the western foreshores, access is currently not available from the area to the back of the Quarantine Station site through the working waterfront area to the newly developed BP site parklands. In this section continuation of access is currently achieved by shared roadway or footpath facilities. From the BP site north access is provided along the pathway to Larkin Street and Woolcott Street. Access continues through Waverton Park as an informal grass link. The park also provides connections up to residential areas via Woolcott and Larkin Streets.

To the eastern shores, foreshore access is blocked at the Noakes Boatyard site which forces access onto poor footpath facilities and steep slopes through to Sawmillers Reserve. From Sawmillers Reserve access is again directed onto footpath street access where existing residences between the Reserve and Blues Point have land ownership to the low water mark inhibiting the access potential to Blues Point. Blues Point Reserve provides some of the most impressive views of the Harbour with access along the seawall. The Reserve lacks a loop connection around the foreshore which could potentially be provided with some shared access over private driveways.

Informal dinghy storage currently occurs to Waverton Park where access steps to the beach area have recently been implemented. Informal craft storage also occurs to the end of John Street and to Sawmillers Reserve. There are also several informal areas where water access can be achieved including stone steps off the Balls Head Reserve tracks.

The Berrys Bay foreshore access includes the informal dirt tracks of Balls Head Reserve, road links, footpath connections and through park or open space linkages.

PRESSURES• Voids to continuous foreshore access in several areas: - Balls Head Reserve to BP site through working waterfront - Noakes Boatyard - Sawmillers Reserve to Blues Point• Access to Blues Point Reserve does not provide loop connection along the foreshore.• Balls Head Reserve tracks and facilities are generally degraded.• Limited access to intertidal zone / waters edge from BP site parkland.

OPPORTUNITIES• Potential for upgrading of Balls Head lookout and picnic areas including identifi cation of views to be protected.• Maintenance and upgrade works to tracks and maintained viewing / rest areas to Balls Head Reserve to enhance and

rationalise existing access to enable more effi cient maintenance.• Quarantine Station redevelopment, incorporating community based use of existing buildings and public access.• Incorporate public access into redevelopment of working waterfront site to ensure continuous accessible foreshore

pathway connection from BP site parklands to Balls Head Reserve, including access through Quarantine Station site. Access provision to ensure:

- Access at most times to the front of the working waterfront - Access is a fundamental condition of lease of the site - Consideration is given to ownership of the land enabling public access.• Provide dinghy / kayak storage facilities and launching pontoon - possible locations under consideration include

working waterfront site, Quarantine Station, and the BP Dolphin Wharf in consultation with NSW Maritime. Provision of pedestrian access to, and upgrade of the existing Dolphin Wharf for recreational and commuter (ferry) boating access in consultation with NSW Maritime and Sydney Ferries.

• Provision of access steps down foreshore embankment in BP site parkland to allow access to waters edge.• Potential formalisation of grassed access link to Waverton Park foreshore.• Proposed provision and upgrade of Commodore Street stairway link as identifi ed in 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore

Access Strategy. • Potential that a portion of rail lands to the rear of Noakes may provide improved access connection to the eastern

side of Berrys Bay.• Stairway connection to Blues Point Reserve to establish loop access - requires access from Blues Point Road to be

formally defi ned as a public access route as access currently occurs / appears as private driveway.• Investigate potential future access from Sawmillers Reserve to Blues Point through planning mechanisms such as

land dedication.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

April 2007


5.2.3 Berrys Bay - Area 3

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

View from Sawmillers Reserve to Blues Point

Street access to Blues Point Road

Blues Point



EXISTING ACCESSForeshore access to Lavender Bay is a combination of open space, on road footpaths and designated access paths. Some of the most impressive views of the Harbour Bridge and the water are provided within Lavender Bay and at Blues Point. Open space vantage points are provided in the open space areas of Blues Point Reserve, Henry Lawson Reserve and Quibaree Park.

The areas of street footpath access to the western side of the Bay, provide framed, postcard type glimpses to the Harbour, Harbour Bridge and Circular Quay and are generally quiet, one-way streets with well defi ned footpath areas. Concrete stairs from Bayview Street provide a connection into Quibaree Park and appear to be part of a popular fi tness (ie. jogging) route. Concrete stairs are also provided connecting East Crescent Street to McMahons Point Wharf. From Quibaree Park continuous access is provided along the Lavender Bay foreshore, alongside Luna Park and connecting into Bradfi eld Park at Milsons Point. Lighting has been proposed by Council to be completed to the Lavender Bay foreshores between Quibaree Park and Milsons Point of walk due to its high commuter use.

Soft access to the water via small beach areas is available at both Blues Point and at Quibaree Park. Quibaree Park provides excellent water access opportunities with both beach areas and wharf facilities. Formal dinghy and craft storage is also provided to the back of the park, within a disused rail arch. A small section of over water boardwalk off East Crescent Street however is currently closed due to structural damage and safety concerns.

The access to Lavender Bay incorporates the following access types and materials:• Asphalt and concrete paths• On street footpaths to generally quiet residential streets• Open space grassed areas• Timber boardwalk to the Lavender Bay foreshore• Stone and concrete stairs

PRESSURES• Boardwalk area to East Crescent currently closed due to structural and safety

problems, as well as ongoing ownership disputes.• Further demand for dinghy storage.• Limited parking availability.

OPPORTUNITIES• 33 East Crescent Street - foreshore access steps to be maintained and existing deck

structure to be rebuilt. Opportunities for continuation of foreshore access to be closely monitored and pursued (eg redevelopment of sites).

• Refurbishment of stairs from East Crescent Street to McMahons Point Wharf as identifi ed in 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy.

• Preparation of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan - scheduled 2006/2007• Additional dinghy storage facilities to Lavender Bay (Quibaree Park) to consolidate

existing use.• Refurbishment and potential relocation of amenities block to Quibaree Park as

identifi ed in 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy.• Lighting of Lavender Bay foreshore walk to Milsons Point to improve commuter

use and safety.• Potential incorporation of barbeque facilities to Lavender Bay parklands to enhance

foreshore use.• Potential for long term use of rail lands as public open space.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Blues Point Reserve

Access stairs to East Crescent Street

View from East Crescent Street

Boardwalk - East Crescent Street

Quibaree Park

April 2007



5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Boat access - Quibaree Park

Formal dinghy storage - Quibaree Park

Lavender Bay foreshore


5.2.5 Milsons Point to Kirribilli - Area 5

EXISTING ACCESSThe foreshore path to Milsons Point and connection through to the Dr Mary Booth Lookout provides access to the foreshore with impressive views across the Harbour to the Opera House. This area incorporates a variety of materials including recently completed steel grated boardwalk and stairs in contrast to existing sandstone cliff and walling. Beyond this point the Milsons Point to Kirribilli zone is the fi rst area on the eastern side of the Harbour Bridge where a signifi cant shift to on street footpath access occurs.

The footpath access to streets in Kirribilli is of varying quality with several narrow streets of limited footpath width. However, there are many areas to these footpaths that provide attractive framed views to the City and the Harbour and maintain the visual and cultural interest of the walking routes. There are also areas such as Lady Gowrie Lookout and Kirribilli Wharf where panoramic views are provided up the Harbour towards the Heads and which provide stopover / rest points for walkers.

Potential informal access to the water is limited to the foreshore to the Dr Mary Booth Lookout. Water access along this part of the foreshore includes what appears to be disused ocean pool areas formed through sandstone walling.

The access types and materials used to the Milsons Point and Kirribilli area include:• Concrete and asphalt pathways• Steel grated boardwalks (with rubber mountings to reduce noise)• Concrete and informal stone steps• On street footpaths• Gravel paths

PRESSURES• Some sections of footpath access are quite narrow with streetscapes generally

more oriented towards vehicular access rather than pedestrian amenity.• Gaps in access to the foreshore to Kirribilli Point and to the western areas of Kirribilli

occur due to large Commonwealth land holdings (eg. Government House) and long runs of private residential ownership.

• Limited physical access to the water.

OPPORTUNITIES• Potential cross park link through Bradfi eld Park.• Proposed amenities block to Bradfi eld Park adjoining Olympic Drive.• Enhancement of north-south access path to foreshore adjoining Broughton

Street.• Potential to incorporate pedestrian and feature lighting to area of Dr Mary Booth

Reserve and Kirribilli Foreshore Reserve foreshore walkways to improve use as commuter link.

• Lift access to Sydney Harbour Bridge pedestrian walkway to improve accessibility for a wide range of users.

• Investigate opportunities for long term potential access to be achieved around Kirribilli Point in liaison and consultation with Federal Government.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Pathway to Milsons Point

Jeffreys Street Wharf

Pathway to Dr Mary Booth Lookout

Water access

Footpath to Waruda Street

View from Lady Gowrie Lookout

April 2007


5.2.5 Milsons Point to Kirribilli Point - Area 5

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

On street footpath access - Kirribilli

Views to the water between buildings

Framed views to the City



EXISTING ACCESSForeshore access to Careening Cove continues the access through Kirribilli, around the foreshore of the Cove to Kesterton Park. Access is predominantly based on street footpaths, with sections of foreshore open space to Wrixton Park and Milson Park. From Milson Park, concrete stairs link through to High Street where footpath access provides connection to Kesterton Park.

Footpath access to Elamang Street to the eastern edge of the Cove provides framed views to the water and is generally a pleasant walk with footpaths to both sides of the street and street trees providing additional pedestrian amenity.

A formal boatshed facility and fl oating pontoon is provided to the termination of Willoughby Street (Wrixton Park) and additional water access is also available from Milson Park.

ISSUES• Generally the access to Careening Cove is appropriate and sustainable given the

residential nature of the foreshore. • Council has highlighted the need to refurbish the access stair link from Milson

Park to High Street in the 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy.

OPPORTUNITIES• Upgrade of boat ramp access to Milson Park in collaboration with Sydney Flying

Squadron.• Refurbishment of access stairs from Milson Park to High Street as identifi ed in 2004

Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Elamang Street

View down Willoughby Street

Wrixton Park

Council boat storage facility

Working waterfront - Elamang Street

Marina area adjoining Milson Park

April 2007



5.0 ACCESS PLAN

View from Milson Park

Stair access from Milson Park to High Street

Stair connection to High Street View down High Street



EXISTING ACCESSAccess to the foreshore at Neutral Bay is predominantly provided by on street footpaths with open space areas at Kesterton Park, Anderson Park and Kurraba Point Reserve. Areas where open space foreshore access is currently not available include the HMAS Platypus site on the western side of the Bay and sections of residential foreshore to the western (Adderstone Avenue) and eastern foreshores, however this site has recently come under public ownership and future redevelopment of the site should incorporate public access connections to the foreshore. Access is also cut off at several points of private residences and the Captain Cook Cruises marina and Australian Customs building.

The on street footpath connections are of varied quality and adjoin / cross major vehicular routes at Clark Road and Kurraba Road. However these sections of access are relatively short and adequate footpaths are provided.

Access to the water is available at several points including a small beach area adjoining the Captain Cook Cruises marina, to the bottom of Ben Boyd Road Park, beach areas to Hayes Street, Neutral Bay and Kurraba Wharves, and a dilapidated slipway at Kurraba Point Reserve.

Access types and material treatments to Neutral Bay include:• Asphalt and concrete paths• On street footpaths• Open, informal grassed links• Timber boardwalk• Public access through private development to Hayes Street foreshore.

ISSUES• Current missing link through Platypus site.• Foreshore open space access voids at Captain Cook Cruises marina and Customs

complex - however limited potential for ongoing access to east due to private residential uses.

• Limited dinghy storage given number of moorings (46).• Boardwalk to termination of Hayes Street does not provide any link to other sites

(is cut off by Customs building).• Access down into Kurraba Point Reserve is unsurfaced and very steep, and is also

poorly signposted.• Existing slipway to Kurraba Point Reserve requires rebuilding.

OPPORTUNITIES• Proposed refurbishment of amenities block to Kesterton Park (completed 2006).• Future development of Platypus site to incorporate public access connections

including potential boardwalk link to Kesterton Park.• Potential future access through Captain Cook Cruises marina if site is redeveloped

or through access negotiations with relevant land owners.• Potential future access across Customs Marine Headquarters.• Any redevelopment to incorporate continuation of link from eastern foreshore to

Anderson Park.• Access link to Nutcote (home of May Gibbs) - design underway.• Potential to rebuild boat slipway at Kurraba Point Reserve and provide formal

dinghy storage racks within the Reserve.• Potential incorporation of barbeque facilities to enhance foreshore use of Kurraba

Point.• Upgrade access connection into Kurraba Point Reserve.• Potential improvements to Hodgson Lookout including playground upgrade.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

High Street Wharf

View from Kesterton Park to Platypus site

Footpath to Clark Road

Anderson Park

Residential proper ties to western foreshore

Captain Cook Cruises Marina

April 2007



5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Customs complex

Boardwalk to Hayes Street

Access path into Kurraba Point ReserveKurraba Point ReserveDilapidated slipway - Kurraba Point



EXISTING ACCESSForeshore open space access to Shell Cove is focused on the western side of the Cove to Cremorne Reserve, with street footpath access along Shell Cove Road the only access to the eastern side. A small Council jetty is however located off Shell Cove Road accessed down steep concrete stairs providing water access opportunities to the east side of the Cove.

The access path around Cremorne Reserve commences off Bogota Avenue and creates an access loop around the foreshore to Roberstons Point linking to Mosman Bay and Mosman LGA. At the entrance off Bogota Avenue, there is a small beach area at (the much lower) water level, that appears to be well utilised for craft access by surrounding residents. Further formal stepped access connections to the Cremorne Reserve path are also provided at the Sirius Street playground and a narrow concrete stair connection off Milson Road.

MacCallum Pool also lies within Cremorne Reserve providing a free, publicly accessible ocean pool. Cremorne Wharf provides an important transport link to the adjoining urban residential areas.

Robertsons Point is a small bushland area that can be accessed from Milson Road or through Wulworra Avenue. It has a small playground and has a contrast of formal grassed areas with tree planting, with bushland to the edges.

Informal dinghy storage currently occurs at points around Cremorne Reserve, and in some cases is causing negative environmental impacts such as erosion via informal tracks from the main path to the water’s edge. These areas are generally focused adjoining the beach area at the head of the Cove. The rock platform to the water’s edge also offers potential water access for users of the Reserve, however formal access tracks are not provided.

The access types and materials to Shell Cove range from:• On street footpaths with varying level of pedestrian amenity• Asphalt and concrete paths• Concrete and informal stone stairs

PRESSURES• Informal dinghy storage to Cremorne Reserve is causing environmental impacts

(erosion etc).• High intensity of use to Cremorne Reserve.• Lighting to Cremorne Reserve to provide adequate safety for users (completed

2006).• Lack of formal dinghy storage.• Lack of disabled access to all of Cremorne Reserve.

OPPORTUNITIES• Potential to incorporate dinghy storage facility to Council jetty.• Potential to provide consolidated dinghy storage points and designated track

access to mitigate current impacts.• Future potential to provide disabled access from Bogota Avenue along western

side of Cremorne Reserve.• Lighting upgrade to Cremorne Reserve (completed 2006).

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Council jetty - Shell Cove Road

On street footpath access

Bogota Avenue entrance to Cremorne Reserve

Beach area off Bogota Avenue

Informal kayak storage - Cremorne Reserve

April 2007



5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Concrete pathway - Cremorne Reserve

Cremorne Reserve - Sirius Street access

Cremorne Reserve



EXISTING ACCESSMosman Bay provides the extension of the Cremorne Reserve access path from Robertsons Point, providing foreshore access along the eastern edge of the Bay. The Sydney Amateur Sailing Club is located along this access path off Green Street. Access continues to the northern end of the Cremorne Reserve walk up to Hunts Lookout and Lower Spofforth Walk. In this area narrow access continues into Mosman via Harnett Park.

Robertsons Point is a small bushland area which combines a section of more formal grass and tree plantings with bushland to the edges. There are several informal tracks that provide access to the rock / cliff edge enabling panoramic views towards Mosman. There is also a lookout at the point, which provides spectacular views across the Harbour. There is also a small lighthouse off the point.

Foreshore open space access to Mosman Bay is a combination of asphalt and concrete paths and small sections of on street footpath access at the northern extent. Stairways are also used to the Lower Spofforth Walk area.

Access to the water is available from the Sailing Club and Old Cremorne Wharf. There is also an access track near the amenities black which provides access down to the rock platform and the water.

The walk provides an interesting harbourside character of bushland waters edge transitioning into heritage residential architecture and related garden landscapes.

PRESSURES• High intensity of use to Cremorne Reserve.• Informal dinghy storage to Cremorne Reserve.• Some areas of access to Hunts Lookout and into Mosman are very narrow.• Areas of Lower Spofforth Walk have asphalt pavements in poor condition.

OPPORTUNITIES• Upgrade of asphalt pavement surface to Lower Spofforth Walk.• Potential for additional formal lookout to Robertsons Point.

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Robertsons Point

View from Robertsons Point to Mosman

Mosman Bay

Track to Robertsons Point

April 2007



5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Asphalt pathway - Cremorne Reserve

Cremorne Reserve

Mosman Bay from Hunts Lookout



EXISTING ACCESSForeshore access to Middle Harbour is provided to nodal park areas, however is predominantly focused on street footpath linkages. The area is typically very steep and many footpath connections are diffi cult to access. Access to the foreshore is discontinuous largely due to large stretches of privately owned residential properties and the steep topography to the waters edge.

Tunks Park provides the access connection to the northern extent of the LGA. The access through the park is to open grass and the access into the park from West Street to the top of the park is not defi ned. Tunks Park is generally an active recreation zone, with fi tness stations and large expanses of maintained grass. Primrose Park is another active recreation area along the foreshore access route. Adjoining this is Brightmore Reserve which is another open grassed park that also has a childrens bike track.

Formal boating facilities are available at Tunks Park, with a boat ramp, jetty and formal car and trailer parking areas. Informal dinghy storage currently occurs to Tunks Park and extensively at Folly Point where a high number of boats are stored to the rock platform and park slope to the water. A small bush track is provided from Folly Point, off Cammeray Road, which provides a linkage through to Primrose Park.

PRESSURES• Footpath provision to many areas is very steep and footpath quality varies, with

some sections of narrow path.• Access is generally very discontinuous and highly convoluted (access directions

are often very unclear).• Intensity of dinghy storage to Folly Point is creating erosion and limiting usability

of the Point by other users.• Access connection to Tunks Park from West Street poorly defi ned.

OPPORTUNITIES• Targeted footpath upgrade to key walking routes.• Improved signage to direct users to foreshore access routes.• Formalisation of grassed access link to Tunks Park to West Street to provide

enhanced entrance - potential joint project with Willoughby City Council.• Potential for formalised dinghy storage to Tunks Park.• Improved access at Folly Point including consolidation of dinghy storage (design

underway).

5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Access stairs to Marks Street

Access into Tunks Park from Quarry Street

Tunks Park

Tunks Park boat ramp

April 2007



5.0 ACCESS PLAN

Footpath to Cammeray Road

Informal dinghy storage to Folly Point

Foreshore to Primrose Park

April 2007


6.1 Criteria for priorities decision makingThe Access Plans outlined in Section 5.0 provide the long term vision for implementation of improved foreshore access in North Sydney. Within this overall framework, a variety of issues will infl uence the phasing of the ongoing programme including availability of funding, land tenure and existing leasing arrangements.

This Access Strategy aims to defi ne the most effective use of Council’s resources to implement new access connections that will provide the greatest improvement to the existing access system.

In establishing priorities, decision making aims to realise the following broad objectives for access development as identifi ed earlier:

• Biodiversity values are protected and enhanced where appropriate including core habitat areas, corridors, and unstable or sensitive ecosystems

• Heritage values (Aboriginal and European) are protected and enhanced • Access via public transport is encouraged, and a network for pedestrian /cycle

movement that facilitates and encourages non-vehicular transport is provided• Path connections for pedestrian / cycle access link the foreshore and adjoining

communities, incorporating continuous foreshore access to areas where environmental and socially sustainable and of demonstrable community benefi t

• The access network provides for usage at a variety of levels and abilities from fi tness and training to family recreation.

• Community involvement in ongoing access management• A variety of visual, environmental, and recreational experiences is afforded by an

access network catering to a wide range of capabilities• Access for people with disabilities to the foreshore is maximised whilst limiting

adverse visual or environmental impacts• Foreshore access provides a balance between community needs and values and

private residential amenity and values• Regional usage of open spaces to be recognised in access provision• Harbour views conserved from foreshore access routes• Access facilities can adapt to changing social and economic infl uences and

recreational trends as feasible without impact on other foreshore values

In the context of these broad objectives the following detailed criteria have also been applied in resolving a fi nal staging strategy:

Function / Design• Access planning to provide linkages between transport nodes and foreshore

destination reserves and access links• Access system to optimise safety and security of users along trails and particularly

through isolated areas - as such maintain clear sight lines and a cleared / maintained corridor along isolated alignments where appropriate

• Links public transport to destination foreshore open spaces and foreshore access corridors

• Links residential precincts to destination foreshore open spaces and foreshore access corridors

• Connections enabling continuous foreshore access are developed as a priority• Role of intertidal access optimised where sustainable• Access directs users to points of interest, and links these points and related

recreational facilities and amenity

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION


Environment• Access planning implementation and management must ensure that the principles

and function of habitat corridors and nodes are supported through the access system.

• Use access system to direct and control public use of the foreshore in a way that minimises unsustainable impacts on biodiversity values whilst optimising interpretation and enjoyment of those values.

• Align access outside habitat corridors as a general approach• Use access to provide a buffer / barrier between maintained landscape areas and

natural vegetation zones• Monitor impacts of existing access where in proximity to sensitive habitat areas• Consider alternative access (eg alternative route or raised boardwalk access) or

removal of access to areas of unsustainable impact• Address missing links through the most sustainable and effective implementation

strategy for the specifi c site

Quality of Experience• Involve community through coordinated liaison and interaction with organised

walking groups• The access system will optimise the extent of the access network that is accessible

to all users as appropriate• Broader and local community benefi t of missing links• Cater for users at both a local and visitor level• Conserve important harbour views from access network

Linkages that address multiple criteria should be ranked higher in staging priority than those that address less criteria.

PrioritiesBased on the realisation of access objectives and the above criteria, a series of priorities can be broadly applied to the Access Plans and broader planning and investigation actions identifi ed in the Access Management Framework. These include:

High target for completion in 1-4 years

Medium target for completion in 4-6 years

Low target for completion in 7+ years

Ongoing

Complete

Ultimately a range of factors will infl uence actual ability to implement works, however this prioritisation can provide a good guide.

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

April 2007


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.2 Design and Materials lifecycle assessmentIn designing for access structures it is important that the design and application of materials refl ect required life spans and the most effective use of resources. The availability of capital works funding will inevitably limit the scope of implementation possible in specifi c timeframes.

However it is important that resources are not spread too thinly in implementing access. It may be preferable to implement a lesser extent of good quality and durable infrastructure than covering further ground with lesser quality infrastructure that will require replacement too soon in the future.

The following table indicates indicative lifecycle costs of the main access infrastructure treatments that are discussed in this plan. The resolution of the most appropriate treatment should take into account the availability of existing and future funding and the immediate / vs future community objectives and needs of access.

Material Anticipated lifespan to major renewal

Supply and install cost - m2

Capital / renewal costs - 10 yearsexcl. escalation

Capital / renewal costs - 30 yearsexcl. escalation

Crushed sandstone

5 years $25.00/m2 $45.00/m2 $155.00/m2

Basecourse 5 years $18.00/m2 $36.00/2 $126.00/m2

Asphalt on base

10 years $50.00/2 $50.00/2 $110.00/m2

Concrete 20 years $60.00/m2 $60.00/m2 $120.00/m2


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.3 Costs FrameworkThe following table summarises the costs assumptions that have been included in the review of likely implementation costs for the 2 year phase one access programme, and in the Action Plan.

Item Description Cost Unit

1.0 Tracks

1.1 Concrete (nominal 1.5m wide) $180.00 lin/m

1.2 Asphalt (without edge - nominal 1.5m wide) $135.00 lin/m

1.3 Crushed sandstone (nominal 1.2m wide) $45.00 lin/m

1.4 Stabilised gravel (nominal 1.2m wide) $35.00 lin/m

2.0 Steps (nominal 1.2m wide)

2.1 Timber (nominal 1.2m wide) $650.00 lin/m

2.2 Steel (nominal 1.2m wide) $1200.00 lin/m

2.3 Concrete (nominal 1.2m wide) $1100.00 lin/m

2.4 Sandstone (nominal 1.2m wide) $1500.00 lin/m

3.0 Boardwalk

3.1 Boardwalk - on grade (eg 500-700mm above ground level) $750.00 lin/m

3.2 Boardwalk - elevated (1.0m plus over water) $1750.00 lin/m

4.0 Furniture

4.1 Seat $2000.00 each

4.2 Bench $2000.00 each

4.3 Picnic Table $2500.00 each

4.4 Fencing - black plastic coated chainwire $70.00 l/m

5.0 Boat Racks

5 racks with crushed sandstone base and timber sleeper running bands

$7500.00 per 5

6.0 Signage

Wayfi nding sign to park $1500.00 each

Wayfi nding sign to street $1500.00 each

Interpretive signage $3000.00 each

7.0 Landscape Enhancement

Recreation / make good to edge of track works (nominal 1.5m each side)

$80.00 lin/m

April 2007


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.4 Action Plan OverviewThe Action Plans as outlined in Section 6.5 provide a listing of component access projects as identifi ed on the Access Plans in Section 5.2.

The overview below summarises the high priority and ongoing works identifi ed for each area.1. Gore CoveNo works of high priority

2. Balls Head Bay• HMAS Waterhen Ongoing liaison with Department of Defense to monitor status of access

opportunities to HMAS Waterhen• Coal Loader Detailed design and documentation planning underway• Balls Head Drive Review shared access effectiveness to Balls Head Drive and implement further

pedestrian safety measures if required• Wayfi nding signage to Oyster Cove Reserve to better identify public access• Orientation marker and information / signage to junction of Balls Head Road and

Horace Street to provide direction and information regarding key access routes and points of interest (Coal Loader, Balls Head Reserve, BP Parklands, Waverton Park and Gore Cove)

• Path formalisation and beautifi cation works adjoining HMAS Waterhen (western side Balls Head Road) and extension of unifi ed footpath connection to Coal Loader and BP Parklands

• Coal Loader construction works in accordance with 2005 masterplan subject to progressive implementation

3. Berrys Bay• Working waterfront sites Ongoing liaison and consultation with NSW Maritime to determine and realise

access provisions across Working Waterfront sites to south of BP parklands• Quarantine Station site Pursue access opportunities with NSW Maritime through Quarantine Station site

(as it is being redeveloped - adaptive reuse)• Dolphin Wharf Ongoing liaison and consultation with NSW Maritime regarding status and berthing

potential of Dolphin Wharf - note: NSW Maritime does not support small boat access to the wharf

• Noakes Boatyard - rail land access Liaison with State Rail Authority and investigation into potential to utilise rail lands

to the rear of Noakes Boatyard to enable enhanced access to eastern area of Berrys Bay

• Sawmillers Reserve to Blues Point Monitor privately owned foreshore sites between Sawmillers Reserve and Blues

Point to carry out opportunities to implement planning mechanisms including potential acquisition to enable land based foreshore access

• Balls Head Reserve Prepare a coordinated plan for Balls Head Reserve including paths, lookout areas,

signage and furniture to guide future upgrade works• Provision of public access stairway from Blues Point to Blues Point Road

including landscape enhancement works to promote public access and prevent carparking


4. Lavender Bay• 33 East Crescent Monitor and pursue extension of foreshore access from existing boardwalk area• State Rail land Ongoing liaison with State Rail to monitor status of disused rail land for future

potential as public open space• Quibaree Reserve - dinghy storage Investigate opportunities for increased dinghy storage to Quibaree Reserve• Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan - scheduled 2006/2007 Prepare coordinated masterplan for Lavender Bay Parklands (including Quibaree

Reserve) to guide landscape and access improvements. Plans to investigate impacts of access on open space / landscape character.

• Pedestrian lighting to Lavender Bay Foreshore including lighting design and electrical engineering components

(investigations as part of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan)• Implement dinghy storage• Implement landscape and access improvements to Quibaree Reserve (investigations as part of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan and Council funding

for access / landscape improvements to Quibaree, Watt and Clark Park)• Refurbishment of amenities block to Quibaree Park (investigations as part of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan)

5. Milsons Point to Kirribilli Point• Sydney Harbour Bridge Pursue opportunities to implement lift access to Sydney Harbour Bridge pedestrian

walkway in conjunction with RTA.• Kirribilli Point Liaison with Federal Government to monitor opportunities for public access to

Kirribilli Point• Footpath monitoring Monitor footpath condition to important on street routes• Proposed amenities block to Bradfi eld Park adjoining Olympic Drive• Provide signage to street footpath routes• Maintain consistent footpath surface quality and material to important footpath

connections

6. Careening Cove• Boat ramp access upgrade to Milson Park in collaboration with Sydney Flying

Squadron

7. Neutral Bay• HMAS Platypus Ongoing liaison and consultation for planning of access and public domain to

HMAS Platypus site• Ongoing liaison with NSW Maritime to determine and realise long term access

link from Kesterton Park to HMAS Platypus as open space to be developed• Adderstone Avenue link Liaison with residential property owners to Adderstone Avenue to investigate

potential for right of way access from HMAS Platypus• Customs Marine Headquarters Liaison and monitoring of Customs Marine Headquarters to assess potential

for access across the site and future potential for the site to come under public ownership

• Captain Cook Cruises

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

April 2007


Liaison and monitoring of Captain Cook Cruises Marina to assess potential for access across the site

• Nutcote to Hayes Street Investigate feasibility of access connection from Nutcote to Hayes Street including

review and monitoring of privately owned foreshore properties through this zone

• Neutral Bay - Eastern Foreshores Monitor redevelopment to eastern side of Neutral bay to incorporate continuation

of access link to / from Anderson Park• Kurraba Point formalised dinghy storage and refurbishment to existing boat

ramp

8. Shell Cove• Disabled access design review Undertake design review of Cremorne Reserve paths to provide ramped

connection from existing path to adjoining street at Bogota Street to enable disabled access

• Dinghy storage to Cremorne Reserve Investigate most ecologically sustainable means of supporting dinghy storage

and access in the bay of Shell Cove • Ramp works to Bogota Avenue to facilitate disabled access to western side of

Cremorne Reserve

9. Mosman BayNo works of high priority

10. Middle Harbour - Willoughby and Long Bay • Intertidal access Liaison with NSW Maritime in regards to potential for intertidal access to Willoughby

Bay (see also 1.0 Planning and Investigation - Item 1.1 and 1.5)• Folly Point Undertake coordinated plan for Folly Point incorporating access, launching and

dinghy storage facilities (design underway)• Access connections - Mosman Liaise with Mosman Council regarding potential for future access connections into

Mosman including connection to open space areas of Quakers Hat Bay• Footpath monitoring Monitor footpath condition to important on street routes• Formalised access paths, dinghy storage and launching facilities to Folly Point• Provide signage to street footpath routes• Maintain consistent footpath surface quality and material to important footpath

connections

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION


6.5 Action Plans

1.0 Planning and Investigation

Item Description Supporting documents /

strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority

1.1 Ecological mapping- Identify locations and distribution of sensitive habitat areas

including intertidal zones- Review against access strategy routes- Identify problem areas for detailed examination, review of

alternatives, and ongoing monitoring until addressed

H

1.2 Signage strategy- Compile a coordinated approach for signage (integrating relevant

components of previous work) which defi nes a hierarchy of unifi ed signage types, which integrates appropriate aspects of existing signage, and provides a principle for their location

- Consider incorporation of signage to railway stations as important link to foreshore access system

- Strategy to consider the relationship of linkages to adjoining LGA’s and land managers (eg NPWS / SHFT)

- Ongoing programme of signage installation

H

1.3 Safety audit- Identify areas of poor visual safety and security through site

inspection and public reporting- Review specific sites to ascertain cause and potential

resolution: - management of vegetation - provision of improved lighting - review of track alignment

H

1.4 Heritage- Compile locations and nature of areas and elements of heritage

significance to foreshore open space and relevant private lands

- Ascertain heritage values / issues relevant to a specifi c site where works are being considered

- Integrate heritage consideration into resolution of site specifi c designs

H

1.4 Access monitoring and recordingPut in place monitoring programme for cost effective cyclical observations of usage levels, issues, maintenance, and community feedback

H

1.5 Facilitation of intertidal access- Review operational implications of intertidal access with NSW

Maritime - confi rm responsibilities- Liaise with NSW Maritime regarding ongoing programme to

facilitate intertidal access

H

1.6 Community liaison- Continue programme for regular interaction between Council

and organised walking groups to enable reporting of issues, and monitoring feedback

- Put in place maintenance responsiveness that enables issues to be addressed in timely fashion

Pedestrian Sub-Committee

H

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

April 2007



strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority

1.7 Liaison with transport authoritiesLiaise with transport authorities to improve public transport effectiveness to nodal open spaces and foreshore access system

H

1.8 View conservation / management- Identify views and vistas to be conserved- Future view conservation / management studies to consider

views at: - McKye Street at Whatmore Lane - Railway Parade at Wakelin Reserve - Horace Street at Defence Site - Balls Head Drive opp. Coal Loader entry gates - Larkin Street - views to Opera House and City - Waverton Park - views to Berrys Bay and City- Integrate conservation of views to relevant Council planning

controls- Integrate vegetation management into relevant Council planning

controls

H

1.9 Planning controls / mechanismsInvestigate potential for incorporation of mechanisms within Council planning policies to facilitate future foreshore access (land dedication, rights of way, easements) to important missing links

H

6.0 IMPLEMENTATION


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

2.0 Area 1 - Gore Cove


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority

Investigation, Planning & Liaison

2.1 NSW Fisheries Site - Gore CoveLiaison with NSW Fisheries to monitor ongoing status of site and potential for extension of Gore Cove Track to front of existing building

L

2.2 Investigate design opportunity for path upgrade to Russell Street to improve grade / accessibility

Smoothey Park Plan of Management

M

Capital Works

2.3 Lighting upgrade to Smoothey Park to facilitate commuter access to Wollstonecraft Station, including lighting assessment, design and implementation

Smoothey Park Plan of Management

$141,795.00 M

2.4 Path upgrade to Russell Street to improve grade / accessibility Smoothey Park Plan of Management

$20,700.00 M

2.5 Path widening and surface improvements to provide shared pathway through Smoothey Park to facilitate cycle access to Wollstonecraft Station

$43,470.00 M

April 2007


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

3.0 Area 2 - Balls Head Bay


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


3.1 HMAS WaterhenOngoing liaison with Department of Defense to monitor status of access opportunities to HMAS Waterhen

H

3.2 Coal LoaderDetailed design and documentation planning underway

Waverton Peninsula Masterplan

H

3.3 Balls Head DriveReview shared access effectiveness to Balls Head Drive and implement further pedestrian safety measures if required

H

Capital Works

3.4 Wayfi nding signage to Oyster Cove Reserve to better identify public access, and landscape improvements to integrate public access link with typical open space / public domain character

$23,450.00 H

3.5 Orientation marker and information / signage to junction of Balls Head Road and Horace Street to provide direction and information regarding key access routes and points of interest (Coal Loader, Balls Head Reserve, BP Parklands, Waverton Park and Gore Cove)

$5,750.00 H

3.6 Path formalisation and beautification works adjoining HMAS Waterhen (western side Balls Head Road) and extension of unifi ed footpath connection to Coal Loader and BP Parklands

$100,682.50 H

3.7 Coal Loader construction works in accordance with 2005 masterplan subject to progressive implementation


H

3.8 Implement cycleway route to Balls Head Road $1,638.75 M

3.9 Improvements to Horace Street lookout / viewing area $14,547.50 M


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

4.0 Area 3 - Berrys Bay


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


4.1 Working waterfront sitesOngoing liaison and consultation with NSW Maritime to determine and realise access provisions across Working Waterfront sites to south of BP parklands


H

4.2 Quarantine Station site Pursue access opportunities with NSW Maritime through Quarantine Station site (as it is being redeveloped - adaptive reuse)

Water Based Recreation Needs Study 2006

H

4.3 Dolphin WharfOngoing liaison and consultation with NSW Maritime regarding status and berthing potential of Dolphin Wharf - note: NSW Maritime does not support small boat access to the wharf


H

4.4 Noakes Boatyard - rail land accessLiaison with State Rail Authority and investigation into potential to utilise rail lands to the rear of Noakes Boatyard to enable enhanced access to eastern area of Berrys Bay

Water Based Recreation Needs Study2006

H

4.5 Sawmillers Reserve to Blues PointMonitor privately owned foreshore sites between Sawmillers Reserve and Blues Point to carry out opportunities to implement planning mechanisms including potential acquisition to enable land based foreshore access

Water Based Recreation Needs Study2006

O

4.6 Balls Head ReservePrepare a coordinated plan for Balls Head Reserve including paths, lookout areas, signage and furniture to guide future upgrade works

H

Capital Works

4.7 Provision of public access stairway from Blues Point to Blues Point Road including landscape enhancement works to promote public access and prevent carparking (project received grant funding from 2006 SHAP)

$85,000.00 H

4.8 Provision of access steps down foreshore embankment in BP site parkland to allow access to waters edge


$27,140.00 M

4.9 Upgrade of tracks and lookout areas to Balls Head Reserve following preparation of coordinated plan

$64,400.00 M

4.10 Implement access through State Rail cutting above Noakes Boatyard subject to agreement with Authority (note: construction of access elements only)

$122,446.25 M

4.11 Provision and upgrade works to Commodore Street stairway link 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy

$33,925.00 L

April 2007


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

5.0 Area 4 - Lavender Bay


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


5.1 33 East Crescent Monitor and pursue extension of foreshore access from existing boardwalk area


O

5.2 State Rail landOngoing liaison with State Rail to monitor status of disused rail land for future potential as public open space

O

5.3 Quibaree Reserve - dinghy storageInvestigate opportunities for increased dinghy storage to Quibaree Reserve


H

5.4 Lavender Bay Parklands - scheduled 2006/2007Prepare coordinated masterplan for Lavender Bay Parklands (including Quibaree Reserve) to guide landscape and access improvements. Plans to investigate impacts of access on open space / landscape character.

Lavender Bay Parklands Draft Masterplan - underway

H

Capital Works

5.5 Pedestrian lighting to Lavender Bay Foreshore including lighting design and electrical engineering components(investigations as part of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan)


$184,500.00 H

5.6 Implement dinghy storage Water Based Recreation Needs Study 2006

$7,500.00 H

5.7 Implement landscape and access improvements to Quibaree Reserve(investigations as part of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan and Council funding for access / landscape improvements to Quibaree, Watt and Clark Park)


$180,000.00 H

5.8 Refurbishment of amenities block to Quibaree Park(investigations as part of Lavender Bay Parklands Masterplan)

2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy


$200,000.00 H

5.9 Refurbishment of stairs from East Crescent Street to McMahons Point Wharf

2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy

$26,000.00 M

5.10 Refurbish / rebuild deck structure to 33 East Crescent Street Water Based Recreation Needs Study 2006

$44,275.00 M


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

6.0 Area 5 - Milsons Point to Kirribilli


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


6.1 Sydney Harbour BridgePursue opportunities to implement lift access to Sydney Harbour Bridge pedestrian walkway in conjunction with RTA

Sydney Harbour Bridge Interpretation Plan (2006)

O

6.2 Kirribilli PointLiaison with Federal Government to investigate and monitor opportunities for public access to Kirribilli Point

O

6.3 Footpath monitoringMonitor footpath condition to important on street routes

H

Capital Works

6.4 Proposed amenities block to Bradfield Park adjoining Olympic Drive

Bradfi eld Park Masterplan

$230,000.00 H

6.5 Provide signage to street footpath routes $13,800.00 H

6.6 Maintain consistent footpath surface quality and material to important footpath connections

$103,500.00 H

6.7 Pedestrian and feature lighting to areas of Dr Mary Booth lookout $117,875.00 M

6.8 Potential cross park link through Bradfi eld Park $28,433.75 M

6.9 Enhancement of north-south access path to foreshore adjoining Broughton Street

$54,740.00 M

April 2007


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

7.0 Area 6 - Careening Cove


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority

Capital Works

7.1 Boat ramp access upgrade to Milson Park in collaboration with Sydney Flying Squadron


$82,000.00 H

7.2 Upgrade stair access from Milson Park to High Street 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy

$41,112.50 M


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

8.0 Area 7 - Neutral Bay


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


8.1 HMAS PlatypusOngoing liaison and consultation for planning of access and public domain to HMAS Platypus site

Ongoing liaison with NSW Maritime to determine and realise access link from Kesterton Park to HMAS Platypus


Harbour Trust Draft Plan for HMAS Platypus

H

8.2 Adderstone Avenue linkLiaison with residential property owners to Adderstone Avenue to investigate potential for right of way access from HMAS Platypus

H

8.3 Customs Marine HeadquartersLiaison and monitoring of Customs Marine Headquarters to assess potential for access across the site and future potential for the site to come under public ownership

O

8.4 Captain Cook CruisesLiaison and monitoring of Captain Cook Cruises Marina to assess potential for access across the site


O

8.5 Nutcote to Hayes StreetInvestigate feasibility of access connection from Nutcote to Hayes Street including review and monitoring of privately owned foreshore properties through this zone


O

8.6 Neutral Bay - Eastern ForeshoresMonitor redevelopment to eastern side of Neutral bay to incorporate continuation of access link to / from Anderson Park

O

Capital Works

8.7 Kurraba Point formalised dinghy storage and refurbishment to existing boat ramp (project received grant funding from 2006 SHAP)

$182,000.00 H

8.8 Long term access link from Kesterton Park to HMAS Platypus as open space to be developed

$136,850.00 H

8.9 Access link at Nutcote (designs currently underway) $80,000.00 M

8.10 Refurbishment of amenities to Kesterton Park - completed 2006 2004 Draft Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy

C

8.11 Hodgson Lookout park area playground upgrade $150,000 M

April 2007


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

9.0 Area 8 - Shell Cove


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


9.1 Disabled access design reviewUndertake design review of Cremorne Reserve paths to provide ramped connection from existing path to adjoining street at Bogota Street to enable disabled access

Cremorne Reserve Plan of Management

Cremorne Reserve Masterplan 1998

H

9.2 Dinghy storage to Cremorne ReserveInvestigate most ecologically sustainable means of supporting dinghy storage and access in the bay of Shell Cove

H

Capital Works

9.3 Ramp works to Bogota Avenue to facilitate disabled access to western side of Cremorne Reserve

Cremorne Reserve Plan of Management


$4,140.00 H

9.4 Implementation of dinghy storage and access to the bay of Shell Cove

$19,320.00 M

9.5 Implement formalised dinghy storage to Council jetty on western side of Shell Cove

$8,625.00 M


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

10.0 Area 9 - Mosman Bay


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


10.1 Additional lookout to Robertsons PointInvestigate design potential to incorporate additional lookout area to Robertsons Point taking advantage of views to Mosman(design concept completed as part of Cremorne Reserve Masterplan 1998)


C

Capital Works

10.2 Path upgrade works to Lower Spofforth Walk (asphalt pavement) Cremorne Reserve Masterplan 1998

$9,200.00 M

10.3 Implementation of additional lookout to Robertsons Point Cremorne Reserve Masterplan 1998

$7,331.25 L

April 2007


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.5 Action Plans

11.0 Area 10 - Middle Harbour - Willoughby & Long Bay


strategies

Indicative Cost

Priority


11.1 Intertidal accessLiaison with NSW Maritime in regards to potential for intertidal access to Willoughby Bay (see also 1.0 Planning and Investigation - Item 1.1 and 1.5)

H

11.2 Folly PointUndertake coordinated plan for Folly Point incorporating access, launching and dinghy storage facilities (design underway)


H

11.3 Access connections - MosmanLiaise with Mosman Council regarding potential for future access connections into Mosman including connection to open space areas of Quakers Hat Bay

H

11.4 Footpath monitoringMonitor footpath condition to important on street routes

H

Capital Works

11.5 Formalised access paths, dinghy storage and launching facilities to Folly Point (project received grant funding from 2006 SHAP)


$86,365.00 H

11.6 Provide signage to street footpath routes $17,250.00 H

11.7 Maintain consistent footpath surface quality and material to important footpath connections

$156,400.00 H

11.8 Formalisation of access path connection to Tunks Park from West Street (in partnership with Willoughby Council)

$24,725.00 M


6.0 IMPLEMENTATION

6.6 Monitoring & EvaluationThe assessment of performance in all areas of government operations is a fundamental component of Council Corporate Strategies. For North Sydney, it is important that regular reviews of the Foreshore Access Strategy are carried out to ensure that:• Capital works construction items meet access objectives;• Action priority timeframes are being met as appropriate; and• The foreshore access system is progressively evolving to meet the needs of local

and regional recreational users.

The range of appropriate performance indicators for the North Sydney foreshore access system should cover measures of both ‘input’ and ‘output’. Input measures would include but not be limited to:• level of on going funding• input in kind by stakeholders

Output measures relate to provision of recreational opportunities and community recreation benefi ts. This requires measures such as:• number and type of users• comments by local residents, or regular users• feedback from organised groups• expenditure and recurrent costs.

Evaluation of the can be used to determine whether:• the plans strategies and outcomes are being achieved• the plans strategies and outcomes remain appropriate• the expectations of the stakeholders remain appropriate.

It is recommended that annual review of the Strategy be undertaken by Council staff. The primary objectives of this review are to:• Identify actions that have been completed• Review feasibility of projects proposed in the high priority timeframe (1-4 years)• Review project priority based on changing needs - there may be opportunities

that arise or are pursued such as grant funding, availability of land, joint ventures with other government or private bodies etc that may increase an actions priority. Priorities will change over time and review of the Strategy will help to ensure that priorities are kept current.

April 2007


7.0 APPENDIX

7.1 Background Review

(a) Draft North Sydney Harbour Foreshore Access Strategy 2004

This document was prepared by Urban Research & Planning - TTW in April 2004. The Strategy was prepared as a response to the community’s need for improved foreshore access and to assist Council’s ability to receive grants under the Sharing Sydney Harbour Access Program. The Strategy notes that it is a complementary tool to the Foreshore Parks and Reserves Plan of Management and was envisaged to be an ongoing document that would be updated as required through its life.

AimThe Strategy’s vision is as follows:.... to promote accessibility to foreshores and waterways for the whole community in order to enhance their quality of life while maintaining the environmental viability. The vision also aims to improve the connectivity of the harbour side’s access links.

Key Infl uences on the Access StrategyThe creation of this document and subsequent exhibition and review by both the community and Council highlighted that the Strategy was not suffi cient in providing a strategic base for Council’s ongoing review and improvement of foreshore access. Form this Council resolved that a more detailed and strategically focused study was required that greater examined the potential for continuous foreshore access to the LGA.

The document primarily derives its objectives from those outlined in the Sharing Sydney Harbour Access Plan and other objectives already defi ned by Council in previous planning documents such as the Foreshore Parks and Reserves Plan of Management.


7.0 APPENDIX


(b) Sharing Sydney Harbour Access Plan 2003

The Access Plan was jointly prepared by the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources and the Waterways Authority to provide an integrated approach to examine both land and water access issues.

AimThe Access Plan identifi es its vision as:.... to improve public access to, and enhance the recreational enjoyment of, Sydney Harbour and its tributaries for the people of Sydney and visitors to the city.

Key Infl uences on the Access StrategyThe Access Plan identifi es a number of strategic projects that may be developed in the longer term (over the next 20 years). Implementation of these projects will be assisted through the Sharing Sydney Harbour Access Program - a fi ver year capital works program with $2 million of State Government funding offered each year for capital works projects, on a dollar for dollar basis.

Major outcomes of the Plan if all projects were to be implemented would include:

Land-based access improvements• 33 kilometres of new walking tracks and on and off-road cycleways along the

foreshores and connections to the foreshores.• Public access increased from approximately 59% to 73 % of the total 320 kilometres

of foreshore.• Improved intertidal access to 32 kilometres of foreshore where the Waterways

Authority will work to remove structures that impeded such access.• Public domain improvements at 15 locations.

Water-based access improvements• New or improved small boat access facilities at 16 sites.• New or improved pick-up and set-down wharves and jetties at 28 locations.• Improvements to 7 boat ramps.• Two new boat ramps.

Areas specifi cally identifi ed within the North Sydney LGA include the following:• Public domain improvements to the Coal Loader site at Waverton• New wharves / pontoons to Berrys Bay and Lavender Bay• Soft access improvements to Berrys Bay• New walking tracks within the Waverton - Berrys Bay area.

April 2007


7.0 APPENDIX


(c) North Sydney Bike Plan 2004

Prepared by Arup Transportation Planning, this study was primarily undertaken to review and update the existing bicycle policy and to assist Council in making future bike planning policy.

AimThe Bike Plan identifi ed a number of objectives including:• Review and establish a network of routes both on-road and off-road to provide a

safe and convenient cycling for all user groups, including commuter, child cyclists, training cyclists and recreational cyclists.

• Identify and recommend a network of routes for implementation based on the cyclist demand with the bike plan providing cycle facilities dependent on existing and proposed demand.

• Identify the existing and proposed bicycle facilities within the North Sydney Council area and if possible to link them with the network of routes identifi ed.

Key Infl uences on the Access StrategyThe review of existing bike routes identifi ed any defi ciencies and a prioritised list of actions was compiled. The Plan recommends implementation of 18 additional cycle routes, with an emphasis on commuter and longer distance cyclists. The majority of these routes are proposed as on-road facilities. The routes identifi ed aim to extend the existing bike routes and link in with the RTA planned regional routes from the Sydney Harbour Bridge to Chatswood.

Several of the proposed routes have signifi cant access implications to the foreshore. These include:• Milsons Point to Cremorne Point - identifi ed as a high priority• Balls Head Drive - identifi ed as a low priority• Lavender Bay recreational route - identifi ed as a low priority• Wollstonecraft Station to Berry Island - identifi ed as a medium priority• Waters Road to Bannerman Road - identifi ed as a medium priority• Miller Street to McMahons Point Wharf - identifi ed as a medium priority



(d) North Sydney Recreation Needs Study 2005

This study was prepared by GHD to provide a realistic and coordinated sport and recreation strategy for the next ten years.

AimThe aim of the study was: to enable the provision of recreational facilities and services in a rational, equitable and effi cient manner over the next 5-10 years so as to ensure the best allocation of resources.

A further component of the study was to establish the existing recreation opportunities, what is needed by the community and what facilities and services can be realistically provided by Council.

Key Infl uences on the Access StrategyThe community consultation aspect of the strategy identifi ed several core issues in

relation to access including:• Open space linkages and walking trails - the study noted that respondents of all

ages identifi ed the need for more continuous linkages between parkland, sports facilities and other community focal points for walking and cycling.

The study noted that there is strong community support for collaboration between the State Government and the Councils of North Sydney, Lane Cove and Mosman to achieve a regional network of short and long distance walking trails. The need for other facilities to complement walking trails such as directional and interpretive signage, seating, enhanced landscaping, picnic and barbeque facilities and lookout / harbour viewing areas was also identifi ed.

• Bikeways - it was highlighted by the community that there is a need to improve safety along busy regional bike paths as well as more guidance signage to help cyclists and pedestrians navigate their way around the local network.

One of the recommendations within the study is to address gaps in provision for informal recreation. The study suggests that a major priority of this will include provision of a safe, attractive and connective pathway and trail network with bushland and foreshore open space. The study also notes that foreshore open space should be maintained and extended where possible for recreational access and where breaks in continuity occur Council should:• identify land acquisition opportunities, or• attempt to link or divert walking trails by other means of access including the local

road network and easements.

Further recommendations include:• Incorporation of disabled access provisions into parks, reserves and sport /

recreation facilities when modifi cations are taking place, in accordance with Australian Standards.

• Development of a watching brief on the strategic acquisition of foreshore (and other) land parcels to advance the establishment of a continuous recreational trails network.

• The facilitation of good access for water based recreation activities.

7.0 APPENDIX

April 2007


7.0 APPENDIX


(e) Foreshore Parks and Reserves Plan of Management 2003

This Plan of Management (POM) was created to look at all foreshore parks and reserves within the North Sydney area. The Plan draws on information contained within previous studies and compiles this into one comprehensive management tool.

AimTo examine the present day condition and characteristics of Council’s parks and reserves, and the factors that impact upon them. From this assessment clear directions and strategies for future management and development can be established.

Key Infl uences on the Access StrategyOne of the planning issues identifi ed by the POM is access, highlighting that not all areas of the existing foreshore parks and reserves are actually accessible.

The study notes that generally the foreshore parks and reserves are well placed in terms of public transport and that it is Council’s policy to encourage use of public transport throughout the North Sydney area. However limited carparking facilities are perceived as a restriction to the use and appreciation of foreshore areas.

In regards to accessing the water, the POM identifi es that there are currently limited opportunities to directly access the water. Similarly, in some areas topographical conditions make access diffi cult.

The POM identifi es a number of objectives and actions that consider access issues. These include:• Small boat storage may need to occur in a more organised manner to avoid

potential user confl icts. Folly Point was identifi ed as an area where confl icts currently occur.

• Opportunities to improve access should be assessed in areas where access is currently diffi cult.

• Visitors to the foreshore parks and reserves should be encouraged to use public transport.

• Cycle racks should be provided to selected parks and reserves to encourage cycle access.

• Opportunities should be investigated to enable water access from selected parks and reserves. Construction of public jetties, steps etc may provide access opportunity.

• Opportunities to link existing foreshore parks and reserves to facilitate a mix of continuous foreshore access and street-based links should be pursued.


7.0 APPENDIX


(f ) North Sydney Pedestrian Network & Amenity Study 1999

This study was prepared by Keys Young with the intention of creating a pedestrian study that would:• Limit the growth, and if possible reduce car dependency• Promote walking as a viable alternative to cars, at least for shorter trips• Improve pedestrian safety and amenity, raise community awareness both of the

value of walking and the opportunities presented by a well connected pedestrian network.

AimThe primary aim as identifi ed in Council’s brief for the study was:To identify and build on strategic linkages and elements in pedestrian networks in North Sydney area, with particular reference to connections between public transport nodes, entertainment and recreation facilities, commercial / retail, residential, foreshore and open space areas.

Key Infl uences on the Access StrategyThe study focuses on the importance of walking as a means of commuting and recreation. The study provides a number of actions and recommendations that have an ultimate aim of improving the walkability of North Sydney. Many of these recommendations are highlighted within the current Foreshore Access Strategy.

The study notes that ideally continuous foreshore access is achieved, however foreshore land is the most sought after for residential development and is a shrinking asset for maritime based industries or functions. The study identifi es that given the cost and high desirability of foreshore land that it will be necessary for on road footpath connections to link sections of foreshore, however these should aim to limit extensive detours in terms of both horizontal and vertical deviation from the foreshore.

April 2007


7.0 APPENDIX


(g) North Sydney Foreshore Open Space Study 1991

This study was commissioned by Council to investigate opportunities for increasing the level of public access to the foreshore areas of Sydney and Middle Harbours.

AimThe major aim identifi ed within the study was to investigate the means by which greater public use of the foreshore areas of the Municipality may be achieved. It was suggested that this could be achieved by:• Increasing the amount of land available to the public on the foreshores.• By increasing linkages between open space areas to encourage greater frequency

of movement.

Key Infl uences on the Access StrategyThis study was primarily focused upon the viability of land acquisitions and impacts of previous planning documents and controls on the ability of Council to improve the level of public access to the foreshore. The study noted that creation of major new open spaces would appear unlikely given the values and costs of foreshore land and that Council’s priority should be focused on links between the major parks.

The study identifi ed a number of implementation mechanisms that may be utilised to achieve local open space and public access including:• Open space reservations• Powers of resumption and acquisition• Leasehold title• Rights of way• Tax and rate incentives• Protection zoning• Foreshore building lines• Section 94 contributions• Development negotiations• Boardwalks• Funding and purchasing opportunities.

Recommendations specifi cally in regard to access included:• Council should commit to the expansion of foreshore access around the entire

waterfront.• Council should seize opportunities to increase the area of foreshore land available

to the public, and assess the long term benefi t and future opportunities for access.

• Access to the water from the street network should be an important fi rst step to achieving foreshore access.

• Boardwalks may provide a mechanism in which to achieve foreshore access, however these should only be considered in areas where their implementation is sympathetic to the existing shoreline.

April 2007


7.0 APPENDIX

7.2 Capital Works Costs

April 2007


7.0 APPENDIX

7.3 Public Exhibition Review of Submissions

north sydney foreshore access strategy · north sydney foreshore access strategy 1.0 introduction...

Documents