nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

22
Presenters Sheryl Abshire, Ph.D. Cindy Cummings, Ed.D. Diane Mason, Ph.D. Kay Abernathy, Ed.D. PK-12 Teacher Use of Web 2.0 Tools

Upload: lamar-university

Post on 20-May-2015

275 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

PresentersSheryl Abshire, Ph.D. Cindy Cummings, Ed.D.Diane Mason, Ph.D. Kay Abernathy, Ed.D.

PK-12 Teacher Use of Web 2.0 Tools

Page 2: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Introduction• Students are engaged in a world of Web 2.0 tools.• Tools have quickly made their way into

classrooms.• Teachers must be prepared to guide this use in

educational settings.• The workplace demands expertise in these

various technologies in order to compete in a 21st century workplace (McArthur Foundation, 2008).

Page 3: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Rationale for Study• There is a need for current research about the

teacher’s specific use of Web 2.0 tools in the PK-12 classroom.

• There is a gap in the literature regarding use of Web 2.0 tools by elementary, middle, and high school teachers.

Page 4: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Research QuestionHow do PK-12 Teachers use of Web 2.0 tools differ between elementary, middle, and high school teachers?

Page 5: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Web 2.0• 24/7 availability of Web 2.0 tools can also be

extremely motivating (Cook & Harrison, 2008).• Pk-12 teachers play a vital role in using Web

2.0 tools in designing learning activities that provide opportunities for interaction with learning and higher academic success (Murphy & Lebans, 2008).

Page 6: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Web 2.0• Adoption Rate of Web 2.0 Tools = Perceived

Usefulness (PU) * Perceive Ease of Use (PEOU) (Karrer, 2006).

• Inherent characteristics of Web 2.0 are so aligned with significant educational pedagogies we are going to have to dramatically rethink our educational institutions and expectations because of them (Hargadon, 2009).

Page 7: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Elementary Teachers• According to Ravitz, Becker, and Wong elementary teachers are more constructivist in their thinking (2000) and constructivist teachers tend to have more effective student use of technology in classrooms (Ravitz et al. 2000).• Elementary teachers are slightly more likely to be a member of a social networking site ("A survey of," 2009).

Page 8: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Middle School Teachers• Blogs and wikis are best used in mathematics with

word problem solving tasks needing collaboration, communication and group work rather than used in daily homework, individual students' work or one answer tests or exams (Zein & Majdalani, n.d.).

• Newlit.org was created for middle school teacher professional development and sharing about wiki use in language arts (Knobel & Lankshear, 2009).

Page 9: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Middle School Teachers• Teachers should model use of digital tools so middle

school students develop digital citizenship (Miller, Thompson, & Franz, 2009).

• Using academic social networks for collaboration permits student active learning rather than passive learning in language arts (Taranto, Dalbon, & Gaetano, 2011).

• Online discussions, such as discussion forums for literature circles are engaging for middle school students (Day & Kroon, 2010).

Page 10: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

High School Teachers• With job-embedded support on use of Web 2.0

tools, secondary teachers appreciate, value, and use the tools for teaching and learning (Murphy & Lebans, 2008).

• In a study by Crook and Harrison (2008), 74% of students surveyed had social networking accounts while 7.3% of teachers used a social networking site in teaching and learning.

Page 11: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

High School Teachers• In a 2010 study, of 97% of classroom teachers

with access to technology only 64% of secondary school teachers indicated they used technology for teaching and learning (Gray, Thomas & Lewis, 2010).

Page 12: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Methodology• Quantitative

– Survey– Self-reported use of Web 2.0 tools with students

• Descriptive Analysis to report teacher responses– Elementary (PK-5th grades)– Middle (6th-8th grades)– High (9th-12th grades)

-

Page 13: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Quantitative Sample• Distributed survey to 289 ETL graduates.• 16 not valid email addresses• 2 opt outs – not PK -12 educators• Possible respondents - 271• 110 completed survey – 40.5 % response rate• Reporting specifically on the use of Web 2.0

tools with PK-12 students(Question #10)

Page 14: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Tools Elementary Middle HighN=36 N=17 N=22

Google Tools 66.7% 100% 63.6%Wikis 41.7% 82.4% 36.4%Blogs 44.4% 82.4% 59.1%Discussion Forums 19.4% 76.5% 22.7%Twitter 8.3% 23.5% 4.5%Facebook 8.3% 58.8% 4.5%Wordle 47.2% 41.2% 27.3%

Animoto 50% 29.4% 31.8%Slideshare 13.9% 47.1% 13.6%Prezi 22.2% 41.2% 68.2%Scratch 5.6% 29.4% 4.5%Stykz 5.6% 21.5% 0%None 13.9% 0% 4.5%

Web 2.0 Usage Data

Page 15: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

Results• Middle School Teachers only group where 100% of

teachers use some sort of tool.• Rank percent ordering revealed that at least 50% of

elementary teachers use Google tools (67.7%) and Animoto (50%).

• Most middle school teachers used Google tools (100%), Wikis (82.4%), Blogs (82.4%), Discussion Forums (7 6.5%) Facebook (58.8%).

• High School teachers used Prezi (68.2%),Google tools (63.6%), Blogs (59.1%).

Page 16: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

DiscussionConclusions Evidence supports the Kober and Lankshear (2009)

research from the National Middle School Association that Middle School teachers are more fully engaged in the use of Web 2.0 tools.

Middle school teacher’s use of Web 2.0 tools, particularly blogs and wikis appear to be supported by the work of Knoble and Lankshear (2009) concerning professional development offerings that provide practical experience for teachers.

Page 17: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

DiscussionImplications• Researchers should define Google tools and examine the frequency and specific use of the Google Tools.• Researchers should investigate barriers that might have prevented elementary and high school teachers from using the Web 2.0 tools in their classroom.

Page 18: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

DiscussionSuggestions for Future Research • More research related to the use of Web 2.0

tools in specific core content areas.• Research related to the PK-12 implementation

as related to categories of Web 2.0 tools such as problem-solving, communication, productivity, and research.

Page 19: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

References• A survey of k-12 educators on social networking and content-sharing tools. (2009). Retrieved from

http://www.edweb.net/fimages/op/K12Survey.pdf • Crook, C., & Harrison, C. (2008). Web 2.0 Technologies for Learning at Key Stages 3 and 4:

Summary Report. Retrieved from http://www.becta.org.uk • Day, D., & Kroon, S. (2010). Online literature circles rock!" Organizing online literature circles in a middle

school classroom. Middle School Journal, 42(2), 18-28.• Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. National Center for Education Statistics, (2010). Teachers’ use of

educational technology in u.s. public schools: 2009. Retrieved from website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf

• Hargadon, S. (2008). Moving Toward Web 2.0 in K-12 Education. Retrieved from• http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2008/10/moving-toward-web-20-in-k-12-education/• Karrer, T., (2006, September 22 ). Adoption of Web 2.0 and eLearning 2.0 Revisited [Web log post].

Retrieved from http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2006/09/adoption-of-web-20-and-elearning-20.html• Knobel, M. & Lankshear, C. (2009). Digital literacies: Wikis, digital literacies, and professional growth.

Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(7), pp. 631-634. • MacArthur Foundation. (November, 2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from

the digital youth project. Retrieved from http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf

• Murphy, J., & Lebans, R. (2008). Unexpected outcomes: Web 2.0 in the secondary school classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 134-147.

Page 20: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

References• Miller, N. C., Thompson, N. L., & Franz, D. P. (2009). Proactive strategies to

safeguard young adolescents in the cyberage. Middle School Journal, 41(1), 28-34. • Ravitz, J. L., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y-T (2000). Constructivist-Compatible Beliefs and

Practices Among U.S. Teachers. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey, Report 4. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine (July).

• Taranto, G., Dalbon, M., & Gaetano, J. (2011). Academic social networking brings web 2.0 technologies to the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 42(5), 12-19.

• Zein, R. & Majdalani, M. (n.d.). Implementation of blogs and wikis in a middle school mathematics classroom: An exploratory case study. Retrieved from Education and Information Technology Digital Library at http://editlib.org/noaccess/40078.

Page 21: Nssa albuquerque final oct_11_2012

For More Information: Lamar University

Beaumont, TXhttp://lamar.edu/

http://stateu.com/lamar/Presentation URL: http://tinyurl.com/8ur7xzr