numerical modeling in physical oceanography

103
Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography Joanna Staneva ICBM, Univerity of Oldenbirg

Upload: gigi

Post on 05-Jan-2016

67 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography. Joanna Staneva ICBM, Univerity of Oldenbirg. What do we study?. Geophysical fluid dynamics. Oceanography Meteorology Climate dynamics. MOTIVATION. Changes in the world ocean are going to be important factors in any global change processes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Joanna Staneva

ICBM, Univerity of Oldenbirg

Page 2: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

What do we study?

Page 3: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Geophysical fluid dynamics

• Oceanography

• Meteorology

• Climate dynamics

Page 4: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

MOTIVATION• Changes in the world ocean are going to be important factors

in any global change processes.

• It is difficult to build an „universal'' ocean model that can treat accurately phenomena on all spatial and temporal scales in the various ocean basins.

• This is due both to finite computer size and CPU speed, and to an imperfect description of the physical processes, such as turbulence.

• Ocean modeling efforts have diversified into different classes,

Page 5: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Classification of Ocean Models

Page 6: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Free Surface and Rigid Lid Models

• In reality, the ocean surface is free to deform under the influence of wind, heating and tidal forces. We find wind-driven waves and surges up to several meters high on its surface. These are typically short-lived, have short spatial scales and fast wave speeds.

• In order to avoid the severe limitation on the time step due to the fast gravity waves, one puts a rigid lid on the ocean as this affects the large-scale motions only slightly. The first such model was formulated by Bryan.

• This model has been recently reformulated by Killworth et al. to retain the free surface by treating the fast modes separately. Models that treat the fast waves implicitly have been developed by Hurlburt et al.

Page 7: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Fixed Level, Isopycnal, Sigma-

Coordinate and Semi-Spectral Models • The models of Bryan and Killworth et al. have all used

fixed levels in the vertical -direction, with a variable spacing of the depth levels.

• On the other hand, Blumberg and Mellor and Haidvogel et al. have introduced a stretched coordinate - referred to as sigma defined as =z/D, where D is the fluid depth.

• In addition Haidvogel et al. have introduced a semi-spectral representation of the vertical dimension (sigma layout) in terms of Chebyshev polynomials (collocation method).

Page 8: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 9: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 10: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Barotropic vs. Baroclinic Models

• Ocean models describe the response of a variable density ocean to atmospheric momentum and heat forcing. This response can very simply be represented in terms of eigenmodes of a linearized system of equations.

• The 0-th mode is equivalent to the vertically-averaged component of the motion, also known as the barotropic mode.

• The higher modes are called baroclinic modes and are associated with higher order components of the vertical density profile.

Page 11: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Barotropic vs. Baroclinic Models

Page 12: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Barotropic vs. Baroclinic Models

• Many ocean models make the hydrostatic shallow water approximation, in which the pressure depends only on the depth , i.e. it's given by the classic hydrostatic relation  

dp/dz=z• This relation holds if the horizontal dimensions

of the ocean volume under consideration are much larger than the vertical dimension, hence the shallow water designation.

• A particular form of the baroclinic models are the so-called reduced gravity models. These are essentially isopycnal models of several deformable layers where the lowest layer has infinite depth and zero velocity.

Page 13: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Barotropic Models Why a barotropic model is interesting and

important? • The free surface elevation couples directly to the

barotropic mode. (using of satellite altimeter measurements of the free surface elevation). Thus information from altimeters may first enter the ocean model through the barotropic mode, where it represents a direct forcing

• The presence of the fast free surface gravity waves. The simple explicit finite-difference schemes treating such waves are subject to severe time step limitations, so that solution of the barotropic mode may lead to large CPU requirements.

Page 14: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 15: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Model Equations for a Barotropic Ocean Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible flow on a rotating Earth

where:

Page 16: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Boundary conditions

closed boundaries in a rectangular geometry

Page 17: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Forcing for Barotropic Models

The circulation in a barotropic ocean is generally the result of two kinds of ``forcings'':

• the wind stress at the ocean's surface• the source-sink mass flows at the basin

boundaries. The source flows could be ocean currents that enter the basin due to wind forcing in an adjacent basin, or enter simply to replace mass driven out by the wind or baroclinic pressure gradients in the model basin. Sink flows have similar origins.

Page 18: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 19: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 20: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 21: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 22: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Distribution of Temperature and Salinity

Annual mean sea surface temperature

Page 23: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Distribution of Temperature and Salinity

Annual mean sea surface salinity

Page 24: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 25: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 26: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Bottom Topography • Bottom depth is one of the most important

parameters for a realistic ocean model.• Bottom depth is derived from acoustic soundings

from a ship. • Very high resolution (approaching 1 km) bottom

topography is generally not available in the public domain.

• The best resolution public domain topography thus far is the gridded ETOP5 at NCAR, which contains 5 min resolution of Earth's topography.

• Another topographic data set is the DBDB-5 (Digital Bathymetry Data Base at 5 min intervals), developed by the U.S. Naval Oceanographic

Page 27: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 28: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 29: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

On finite differencing

• Typical equation in Oceanography and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (GFD)

• On finite differences• Finite difference form of equations• Higher order schemes• Time evolution• More complex models and grid arrangements• PROBLEMS!

Page 30: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

On finite differencing

• Typical equation in Oceanography and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (GFD)

• On finite differences• Finite difference form of equations• Higher order schemes• Time evolution• More complex models and grid arrangements• PROBLEMS!

Page 31: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Typical equations in Oceanography

• Equations

• Boundary conditions

),,( xtF

xD

xxU

t

or

)(tb

)())(()(

0

tbtax

t

x

Page 32: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

On finite differencing

• Typical equation in Oceanography and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (GFD)

• On finite differences• Finite difference form of equations• Higher order schemes• Time evolution• More complex models and grid arrangements• PROBLEMS!

Page 33: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Taylor expansion

For the first order derivative

...)(

!3

1)(

!2

1)(

!1

1)()( 3

3

32

2

2

x

x

xx

x

xx

x

xxxx

which is correct to order: )(~)( 2

xOx

xO

x

xO

x

xxx

x

x

)()()()( 2

Page 34: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

More accurate scheme

For the first order derivative

which is correct to order: )( 2xO

x

xO

x

xxxx

x

x

)(

2

)()()( 3

...)(

6

1)(

2

1)()()(

...)(

6

1)(

2

1)()()(

33

32

2

2

33

32

2

2

xx

xx

x

xx

x

xxxx

xx

xx

x

xx

x

xxxx

Page 35: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Second order derivative

(1)+(2) and rearranging:

which is correct to order: )( 2xO

2

4

22

2 )()()(2)()(

x

xO

x

xxxxx

x

x

...)(

6

1)(

2

1)()()(

...)(

6

1)(

2

1)()()(

33

32

2

2

33

32

2

2

xx

xx

x

xx

x

xxxx

xx

xx

x

xx

x

xxxx

Page 36: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Thin fluid layersLarge aspect ratio

Page 37: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Highly turbulentGulf stream: Re~1012

Page 38: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Large variety of scales

Parameterizations are important in geophysical fluid dynamics

Page 39: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days

• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year• El Nino: 2-5 years.• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10 years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 40: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Tropical hurricane Floyd

Page 41: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days

• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years

• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year• El Nino: 2-5 years.• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10 years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 42: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Plankton bloom

Page 43: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Plankton bloom

Page 44: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Plankton bloom

Page 45: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Plankton bloom

Page 46: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years

• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year• El Nino: 2-5 years.• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10 years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 47: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 48: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year

• El Nino: 2-5 years.• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10 years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 49: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Normal state

Page 50: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Initial ENSO state

Page 51: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

The ENSO state

Page 52: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

The ENSO state

Page 53: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year• El Nino: 2-5 years.

• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10 years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 54: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Positive NAO phase Negative NAO phase

Page 55: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography
Page 56: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year• El Nino: 2-5 years.

• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10

years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 57: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Ozon at Antartic

Page 58: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year• El Nino: 2-5 years.• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10 years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.

• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.

• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 59: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Temperature in the North Atlantic

Page 60: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Ocean conveyer belt

Page 61: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Timescales

• Atmospheric low pressures: 10 days• Seasonal/annual cycles: 0.1-1 years• Ocean eddies: 0.1-1 year• El Nino: 2-5 years.

• North Atlantic Oscillation: 5-50 years.• Turnovertime of atmophere: 10 years.• Anthropogenic forced climate change: 100 years.• Turnover time of the ocean: 4.000 years.

• Glacial-interglacial timescales: 10.000-200.000 years.

Page 62: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Orbital forcing

Page 63: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Glacial-interglacial cycles

Page 64: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Ice coverage, sea level

Page 65: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

What model will we use?

Page 66: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Mathematical modelsMathematical models • Development and evaluation of coupled modelling

capabilities calibrated against data from observations.

• The numerical models aim to develop the necessary tools for the integrated study of physical and ecosystem dynamics.

• Great efforts have to be made to ensure the interdisciplinary connections. The oil and chemical spill modeling can be integrated in the "real-time" simulations. The assimilation would additionally enhance this mathematical tool.

Page 67: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution

Numerical models of ocean currents have many advantages.

• They simulate flows in realistic ocean basins with realistic bottom topography.

• They include the influence of viscosity and non-linear dynamics.

• They are used to calculate possible future flows in the ocean.

• They interpolate between sparse observations of the ocean produced by ships, drifters, and satellites.

Page 68: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution

Numerical models are not without problems.

"There is a world of difference between the character of the fundamental laws, on the one hand, and the nature of the computations required to breathe life into them, on the other''-Berlinski (1996).

• The models can never give complete descriptions of the oceanic flows even if the equations are integrated accurately.

• The problems arise from several sources.

Page 69: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution Discrete equations are not the same as continuous

equations

• Discretization is essential for computer implementation and cannot be dispensed with.

• The essence of the difficulty is that the dynamics of discrete systems is only cloosely related to that of continuous systems-indeed the dynamics of discrete systems is far richer than that of their continuous counterparts-and the approximations involved can create spurious solutions.

Page 70: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution Calculations of turbulence are difficult

• Numerical models provide information only at grid points of the model. They provide no information about the flow between the points.

• Yet, the ocean is turbulent, and any oceanic model capable of resolving the turbulence needs grid points spaced millimeters apart, with time steps of milliseconds. Clearly, such a model can be used only for flow in a small box.

• Practical ocean models have grid points spaced tens to hundreds of kilometers in the horizontal, and tens to hundreds of meters in the vertical.This means that turbulence cannot be calculated directly, and the influence of turbulence must be parameterized.

Page 71: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution Practical models must be simpler than the real

ocean

• Models of the ocean must run on available computers.

• This means oceanographers further simplify their models, usually giving up resolution in the horizontal or vertical.

• They cannot, for example, run the most detailed models of oceanic circulation for thousands of years to understand the role of the ocean in climate.

Page 72: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution Initial conditions are not well known.

How to initialize the model? • We do not know accurately the present velocity and

density in the ocean.• The best we can do is to start at rest using the best

estimates of the ocean's density field, such as that contained in cöimatic data produced by Levitus

• .... or we can use the output from an earlier run of the model or a similar model. Still, there are difficulties.

• ....and the oceans take hundreds of years to come to equilibrium with the atmosphere, so models must run for hundreds of years to get the right deep circulation.

Page 73: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution Numerical code has errors

Do you know of any software without bugs (errors)?

• Numerical models use many subroutines each with many lines of code which are converted into instructions understood by the computer circuitry using other software called a compiler. Eliminating all software errors is impossible.

• With careful testing, the output may be correct, but the accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Plus, numerical calculations cannot be more accurate than the accuracy of the floating-point numbers and integers used by the computer. Round-off errors cannot be ignored.

Page 74: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical models Some Words of Caution Summary

• Despite these many sources of errors, most are small in practice.

• Numerical models of the ocean are giving the most detailed and complete views of the circulation available to oceanographers.

• Some of the simulations contain unprecedented details of the flow.

• I included the words of warning not to lead you to believe the models are wrong, but to lead you to accept the output with a grain of salt.

Page 75: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Numerical Models in Oceanography

• Mechanistic models are simplified models used for studying processes. Because the models are simplified, the output is easier to interpret than output from more complex models. (including models for describing planetary waves, the interaction of the flow with sea-floor features, or the response of the upper ocean to the wind ).

• Simulation models are used for calculating realistic circulationof oceanic regions. The models are often very complex because all important processes are included, and the output is difficult to interpret.

Page 76: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Primitive - Equation Models

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Modular Ocean Model MOM

• perhaps the most widely used model growing out of the original Bryan-Cox code.

• It consists of a large set of modules that can be configured to run on many different computers to model many different aspects of the circulation.

• The model is widely use for climate studies and and for studying the ocean's circulation over a wide range of space and time scales

• The model uses the momentum equations, equation of state, and the hydrostatic and Boussinesq approximations. Subgrid-scale motions are reduced by use of eddy viscosity. Versions 3+ of the model has a free surface, realistic bottom topography, and it can be coupled to atmospheric models.

Page 77: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Primitive - Equation Models

Semtner and Chervin's Global Model

• was perhaps the first, global, eddy-resolving model based on the Bryan-Cox models

• It has much in common with the MOM and it provided the first high resolution view of ocean dynamics.

• It has a resolution of 0.5° x 0.5° with 20 levels in the vertical.• It has simple eddy viscosity, which varies with scale; and it does

not allow static instability. • In contrast with earlier models, it is global, it resolves the largest

turbulent eddies, and it has realistic bottom topography and coastlines. Originally, it had a rigid lid to eliminate fast-moving waves such as tides.

• More recent versions of the model have a free surface, eliminating the restrictions of the rigid lid.

Page 78: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Primitive - Equation Models

Parallel Ocean Program Model• produced by Smith, Dukowicz, and Malone(1992). The modifications included removing the rigid-lid at the surface,

improving the numerical algorithms, and adding realistic coasts, islands, and unsmoothed bottom topography.

• The model has 1280 x 896 grid points on a Mercator grid which extends from 78° S to 78° N, and 20 levels in the vertical. The Mercator projection gives grid spacing that decreases with latitude at the same rate that the diameter of typical eddies decreases. Horizontal resolution varies from 6.5km at the highest latitudes to 31.25 km at the Equator.

• The model was initialized using temperature and salinity calculated from Semtner's(1993) 0.25° model. The model was then integrated for a 10-year period beginning in 1985 using various surface-forcing functions.

Page 79: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Primitive - Equation Models

Miami Isopycnal Coordinate Ocean Model MICOM

• All the models just described use x, y, z coordinates. Such a coordinate system has disadvantages. For example, mixing in the ocean is easy along surfaces of constant density, and difficult across such surfaces.

• A more natural coordinate system uses x, y, , where is density. A model with such coordinates is called an isopycnal model.

• Essentially, (z) is replaced with z(). Furthermore, because isopycnal surfaces are surfaces of constant density, horizontal mixing is always on constant-density surfaces in this model.

Page 80: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

                                    

Instantaneous, near-surface geostrophic currents in the Atlantic for October 1, 1995 calculated from the Parallel Ocean Program numerical model developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.The length of the vector is the mean speed in the upper 50 m of the ocean; the direction is the mean direction of the current.

Page 81: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

 

Output of Bleck's Miami Isopycnal Coordinate Ocean Model MICOM. It is a high-resolution model of the Atlantic showing the Gulf Stream, its variability, and the circulation of the North Atlantic (FromBleck).

Page 82: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Coastal Models

• The great economic importance of the coastal zone has led to the development of many different numerical models for describing coastal currents, tides, and storm surges.

• The models extend from the beach to the continental slope, and they can include a free surface, realistic coasts and bottom topography, river runoff, and atmospheric forcing.

• Because the models don't extend very far into deep water, they need additional information about deep-water currents or conditions at the shelf break.

Page 83: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Storm-Surge Models• Storms coming ashore across wide, shallow, continental

shelves drive large changes of sea level at the coast called storm surges. The surges can cause great damage to coasts and coastal structures.

• Calculating storm suges is not easy. Here are some reasons, in a rough order of importance.

1. The distribution of wind over the ocean is not well known. 2. The shoreward extent of the model's domain changes with time. 3. The drag coefficient of wind on water is not well known for

hurricane force winds. The drag coefficient of water on the seafloor is also not well known.

4. The models must include waves and tides which influence sea level in shallow waters.

5. Storm surge models must include the currents generated in a stratified, shallow sea by wind.

Page 84: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

     

Topographic map of the Gulf of Maine showing important features of the Gulf. (From Lynch et al, 1993).

Page 85: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Triangular, finite-element grid used to compute flow in the Gulf of Maine shown in the previous figure. Note that the size of the triangles varies with depth and rate of change of depth. (From

Lynch et al, 1993).

Page 86: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Coupled Ocean and Atmosphere Models

• Coupled numerical models of the atmosphere and the ocean are used to study the climate system, its natural variability, and its response to external forcing.

• The most important use of the models has been to study how Earth's climate might respond to a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere.

• Other important uses of coupled models include studies of El Niño and the meridional overturning circulation. The former varies over periods of a few years, the latter varies over a period of a few centuries.

Page 87: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Nested modelAllows a very fine model set-up for a limited area using results

from coarse grid simulations.

Involves two simulations running simultaneously:

The main run – the whole area (relatively coarse grid) The secondary model - much smaller area (finer numerical grid)

Merging grids

Page 88: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

BSH ModelRegions

Page 89: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

MIKE 21 - NESTED HYDRODYNAMIC MODULE

Using a nested grid provides a feedback mechanism between the large and fine grid boundaries,

It is possible to resolve the flow fields in narrow channels or inlets within a coarse grid nearshore model using the enhanced resolution of finer grids.

Page 90: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

DATA ASSIMILATION

METHOD: We solve for the IC and forcing, which provide the best model-data comparisons

Global Ocean example:

Variability of Sea Level Height and oceanic state using 4D-VAR data assimilation

We assimilate: T/P data, SST, transports, T,SControl parameters: NCEP data and Levitus climatology

Page 91: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Sea level variabilityobtained by Global Ocean

Assimilation

Page 92: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

WHY A MODEL CAN DO BETTER THAN CORRELATIONS BETWEEN EVENTS?

 

The synergy between the different human forcings cannot be assessed from simple correlations between ecological observations and historical correlations.   Mechanistic models, which describe the kinetics between biological and chemical compartments as a function of meteorological and human forcings provide a powerful tool which encompass this complexity.   When validated the model can be used for management purpose. 

Page 93: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Black Sea example

Implementing such a model for the north-western Black Sea is our objective during the DANUBS project.

 

The ecological model ERSEM is used in order to assess the response of the north-western Black Sea ecosystem to human-induced changes and meteorological forcing

Page 94: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

MIT General circulation model

Page 95: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

MIT General circulation model

• General fluid dynamics solver• Atmospheric and ocean physics• Sophisticated mixing schemes• Biogeochemical modules• Efficient solvers• Sophisticated coordinate system• Automatic adjoint schemes• Data assimilation routines

• Finite difference scheme• F77 code• Portable

Page 96: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

MIT General circulation model

Spherical coordinates “Cubed sphere”

Page 97: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

MIT General circulation model

Page 98: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Some computational aspects

Page 99: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Experiments with 60*60*20 grid points

Page 100: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Specfp (swim)

0100200300400500600700

Ru

n t

ime

Page 101: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Compiler

• Portland Group (PGF) ca 8000 s

• GNU fortran compiler 7750 s

• Intel Fortran Compiler (IFC) 6225 s

Page 102: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Important Concepts 1. Numerical models solve discrete equations, which are not the

same as the equations of motion described in earlier chapters. 2. Numerical models cannot reproduce all turbulence of the coean

because the grid points are tens to hundreds of kilometers apart. 3. Numerical models are used to simulate oceanic flows with

realistic and useful results. The most recent models include heat fluxes through the surface, wind forcing, mesoscale eddies, realistic coasts and sea-floor features.

4. Numerical models can be forced by real-time oceanographic observations from ships and satellites to produce forecasts of oceanic currents especially eddies.

5. Coupled ocean-atmosphere models have much coarser spatial resolution so that that they can be integrated for hundreds of years to simulate the natural variability of the climate system and its response to increased CO2 in the atmosphere.

Page 103: Numerical Modeling in Physical Oceanography

Thanks for your attention