numerical modelling of soil structure interaction problem
TRANSCRIPT
Oasys User Group ForumNumerical Modelling of
Soil-structure Interaction Problems
Hoe Yeow
SoftwareIn-house Oasys SAFE for 2D problems
Propped excavation Berm excavation Tunnel & tunnelling
-20.00 20.00 60.00 100.0
X [m]Scale x 1:500 y 1:500
-5.000
.0
5.000
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
Y [m
]
Façade model Embankment and slope
SoftwareBP00.1
In-house Oasys LS-Dyna for 3D problems (PC based)
Car crash Air bag
Gravity foundation Tunnelling Piled raft
BRICK soil modelState of the art non-linear, small strain fine grain soil model(Simpson 92)
London ClaySingapore Marine ClayFlorence claysBangkok clays Hong Kong CDG (back analyses only)
Why Numerical Modelling? HP000.1
• Design requirements
• Economic design
• Justifying critical design
• Complex problems, evaluating risks
• Investigate failures
• Ground movement damage assessments
• Client’s requirements
Design Requirements (Potts and Zdravkovic, 1999)
Economic DesignBP00.1
2m
HomogeneousIsotropicclay
1m
= 20kN/m3
d
1m c5kPa25 = 0.67sw = 0
8m
1
3
5
7
9 8.7m
7.3m
6.0m
LE PseudoFE FE/FD
Wa
ll E
mb
ed
me
nt
d (
m)
500
1000
1152
837734
LE PseudoFE FE/FD
Cal
cula
ted
Max
imum
ULS
Wal
l BM
(kN
m/m
)
• minimum saving of £860,000• reduction of excavation programme
from 15 months to 6 months
page 145 …..
… combined numerical modelling and observation methodValue for money - Batheaston Bypass BP00.1
(1998)
Value for money – Canary Wharf Piled Raft BP00.1
• Base grouted bored pile (capacity m)• Raft action to increase mean effective stress• Savings of 30% in piling cost• Complex soil-structure interaction
Justifying critical design and approval BP00.1
Metsovitikos Bridge (original design)
Tunnelling operation
- complex ground conditions- highly 3D- slope stability- ubiquitous joint model
- complex SCL sequence(previously known as NATM)
- large excavation next to existing tunnels
Gravity anchor foundation
Ashford Box Design (1.8km cut and cover, 15m deep)BP00.1
• Non-symmetrical• Interaction btw. walls• Permanent under slab
drainage system• Permeability, kh > kv• Observation method
Complex problem, evaluate construction risks and approval
RC bored pile, 1.8m diameter
Steel tunnel 3.68m diameter, 0.508m segment width, 124mm flange thickness
Each elementis 0.508m wide,to represent a segment
Horizontal displacement
Deformed shape
200x magnified
Investigate failure BP00.1
Hull tunnel
Heathrow Express Tunnel Collapse
Ground Movement & Damage Assessments BP00.1
Excavation
Computedtunnel’sdistortion
Effects on existing tunnels
Britannic House
Client’s requirements (Florence TAV Station, Italy)
Tension piles
Pseudo-FEFREW
Railway loading
• Non linear, small strain soil model
• Coupled consolidation• Compare with pseudo-FE
computation
Non-linear soil model
Wall
28m
SAFE
Prop 1
Prop 2