nunu poe phil 1722 section- 60 diana pretty from england not allow assisted suicide in england have...
TRANSCRIPT
Diana PrettyFrom England
Not allow assisted suicide in England
Have family
Was rejected from both England and European Human Right
Motor Neuron DiseaseMND ( Information )Progressive DiseaseOver 40 yrs old, between 50-70 Men & Women 1:21 or 2 per 100,000 diagnosed each year in U.K
SymptomsMuscle weaknessLater, difficulty with mouth, throat, neck
TreatmentCannot prevent from developing
Continue…..
Up to 5,000 people in Britain have MND It stops the brain sending messages to muscles, which waste
More people die of MND than Aids Most sufferers stay mentally alert
It's not contagious
What she was willing…Diagnosed in 1999 (43 yrs old)In 2000, wrote to Tony Blair to change lawIn 2001, Ask public prosecution for husband can
help herOctober, 2001, England high court reject,
November, confirm by law lord BinghamMarch, 2002, European court; 12 hrs with
ambulanceApril, 2002, European human right court
rejectedDied in 2002 at hospice
Sadly,Lost her right to end of her life in England
European human right court also rejected her appeal
Main PartiesDianna Pretty
Brian Pretty( husband)
Tony Blair ( Prime Minister)
David Calvert Smith ( Public prosecution, England)
Lord justice Tuckey ( High court, England)
Lord Bingham (Law Lord, England)
European Human Right Court
Ethical IssueTerminal illnessPatient agreed voluntarily Her husband wanted to help
Why could not justice let her die?Who needed to agree for that?Does someone have a right to help dying?Should Mercy killing or Assisted suicide be
allowed?
Autonomy: Self-determination; right of patient
to participate in …..
Patient felt lose her right
Even it was voluntary, lost decision
Justice: Deals with fairness, deserts, and distribution of good and services …..
Diane Pretty speaks through her husband Brian: "I feel I have no rights“
Justice is not for individual emotion, but it can be distributed.
Netherland, Belgium, Switzerland
Utilitarian: Consequence based ethicist believeGood reside in the promotion of happiness or the greatest net increase of pleasure over pain
Could not win to die so that she could not die with dignity
Utilitarian ethic did not apply in this case
If physicians or laws helped her that would have been an utilitarian solution.
Kantian: Duty based ethical believeIt would be wrong or right because it does not depend on situation or consequences
England high court and European human right decide as a duty-oriented
76 native British go to Switzerland for assisted suicide with non-physician although England practice Kantian ethic
Analysis of Assisted SuicideProponentNeed to change lawBoth in political and
health careTerminal ill people
will satisfyCan spend money
for others area( research, organ transplant)
OpponentDoes not need to
change lawConservative people
will be happyNeed more hospice
care and palliative careKeep society maintain
stable
Continue…..I would choose an utilitarian theory
Good for patient and family not only financial but also benefit to others proponents’ claims
Some terminal ill patients will be happy to claim to die with dignity
Autonomy and human rights will be validated
Continue…Cannot harm to physician role, just allowed
to family members can involve in assisted suicide
Everyone should have a right to assistance for dying, if patient will not recover
Should allow assisted suicide: not mercy killing!!
No one should not have a benefit with her death!!!
ReferencesEdge, R S, & Groves, J R. (2006). Ethic of health care. NY:
Delmar. Print.
Humphrys, John. "End-of-Life Decisions Are Personal and Should Be Respected." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Apr. 2011.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/beds/bucks/herts/6647419.stm
"Supporter of Death with Dignity." Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Apr. 2011.