obia for combining lidar and multispectral data to ... · pdf fileivth international...
TRANSCRIPT
IVIVthth International Conference, International Conference, & li i& li iLIDAR & SAR applicationLIDAR & SAR application
OBIA for combining LiDAR and multispectral data to characterizemultispectral data to characterize forested areas and land cover
in tropical regionin tropical region
StéphaneStéphane DupuyDupuy11, , GérardGérard LainéLainé1,1, and Thierry Tormosand Thierry Tormos22
(1)(1) CIRAD,CIRAD, UMRUMR TETIS,TETIS, EarthEarthObservationObservation forfor EnvironmentEnvironment andandLandLand Management,Management, Montpellier,Montpellier,
((22)) IRSTEA,IRSTEA, URUR MALY,MALY, PolePole ONEMAONEMA //IRSTEAIRSTEA freshwaterfreshwater hydroecologyhydroecology,,Lyon,Lyon, FF‐‐6933669336,, FranceFranceLandLand Management,Management, Montpellier,Montpellier,
FF‐‐3439834398,, FranceFranceLyon,Lyon, FF 6933669336,, FranceFrance
The French National Agency for Water and Aquatic EnvironmentsThe French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Study area
375 km²
Mayotte is an island of the ComoroArchipelago located at the entranceof the Mozambique Channel
2GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
qFrench territory : overseas department
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Forest areas in MayotteSince 2002, five forest reserves were established to preserve biodiversity of Mayotte
(5550 ha = 15% of the territory)( y)
Forest complexes are more or less degraded inside reserves because of old and actual human pressures
Agricultural activity in reserves(direct human pressure)( p )
Eroded areas result from slash and Clearing of local
3GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
burn cultivation species
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Forest areas in MayotteSince 2002, five forest reserves were established to preserve biodiversity of Mayotte
(5550 ha = 15% of the territory)
Forest complexes are more or less degraded inside reserves because of old
( y)
and actual human pressures
Presence of Lianas(indirect human pressure)
Invasive specie( p )
C ll d f
4GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Collapsed forest areas
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Forest areas in MayotteSince 2002, five forest reserves were established to preserve biodiversity of Mayotte
(5550 ha = 15% of the territory)
Forest complexes are more or less degraded inside reserves because of old
( y)
and actual human pressures
Managers need spatial information about :1‐ status (degraded or not) of forest areas inside reserves2‐ presence of human pressures inside and outside reserves
5GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazilto prioritize preservation and restoration strategies
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Objective: Mapping forest types, their status, and human pressuresp
Classification schemeForest types inside reserve …. and their status
Canopy height :[5‐10] m
Canopy height : ≥10 m
h f d
Not degraded / potentially degraded
Mangrove
Forest plantation (reforestation)
Need toLidar & multispectral
Other forested areas
Human pressures (direct and indirect)Forest plantation (reforestation)
Collapsed forest area induced by lianas
remotely sensed data
Eroded areas (bare soil / herbaceous / fern)
Artificial surfaces ( urban and agricultural)
Other land cover classes
6GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Other land cover classesNatural Low vegetation / Shrub cover / bare soil / bare saline soil / beach dune / water …
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Lidar data Lidar cloud points
1 x 1 m, October 2008
DSMDigital Surface Model
DTMDigital Terrain Model
difference
DHMDigital Height ModelDigital Height Model
Median filter(3×3 m)
DCM
DCMDigital Canopy Model
Popescu et al., 2002
7GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
DCM
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Multispectral data
Spot 5 XS Aerial photographies (orthophotos)Spot 5 XSGreen, Red, Near Infra‐Red and
Medium infra‐Red10 x 10 m June 2005
Aerial photographies (orthophotos)Blue, Green, Red, and
Near Infra‐Red0 5 x 0 5 m November 2008
8GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
10 x 10 m, June 2005End of wet season
0.5 x 0.5 m, November 2008Dry season
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Thematic dataMMangrove o MangroveMangrove
Eroded areaso Forest plantationso Eroded areas
Forest plantations
o Forest plantationso Collapsed forest areas with lianao Artificial surfaces (Built up area,
R lti f
Main road, Mine dump....)
Resulting from :1‐ available topographic data or2‐ previous photo‐interpretation studies based on multispectral images
9GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Two pre‐processing on DCM data1‐For improving segmentation of forest type
Based on DCM Based on Max filter and DCMp g g yp
Max filter(3×3 m)
Object boundaries
(3×3 m)Popescu et al., 2002
10GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Two pre‐processing on DCM data2‐ For enhancing the classification of forest types status (degraded or not)
CooccuNo degraded area
DCM profile on transect
530 5
Haralick texture : GLCM variance all
directionsm) 15
2025
ce23
4
51 m x 51 m.he
ight (m
0510
5 ckvaria
n0
16
Degraded area
Cano
Cano
py
2530
35
Haralic
45
6CaCo
1015
20
> 2 potentially degraded2
311
051
0 50 100 150
< 2 not degraded
01
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Image classification techniqueII
OBIAo Multi‐level segmentation approach
II
o Classification based on expert knowledge rules
NN
Softwareo eCognition 8 using multi‐resolution algorithm (region growing technique)
12GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result ConclusionOBIA workflow
vector
data
Segmentation (level 1)
Step 1: Thematic classification Step 1
ThematicNo Thematic
max filterTh
ematic Classification
(level 1)
Step 2: Height classification
Mangrove
Eroded areas
Built areas
LiDAR de
DCM
Segmentation (level 2)
l f
Step 2…
erived data
canopy h
e)
Classification (level 2)
Merging same class
≤ 5 m 5 - 10 m ≥ 10 m
≥ 10 m pot. degraded
5 – 10mNo degradedheight co‐occurr
variance
ral data
y + Spot 5 im
age Adjacent objects
Segmentation
Step 3: Land cover classification
Step 3
p g
≥ 10 mno degraded
5 – 10 mPot. degraded
g
rence
Multispe
ctal pho
tography Segmentation
(level 3)
Classification
pWater
Bare soils
bare soils on Erodedareas
…
13GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
(aeri
(level 3)
3 successive segmentation‐classification processes…
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result ConclusionMap accuracy
Control data derived from field measurements
August and October 2009 and January 2010
• Global accuracy : 84 %• Kappa index : 80 %• Kappa index : 80 %
• Highly accurate results for(more than 80%)(more than 80%)‐ forest types‐ shrub and low vegetation• Poorest accuracy for(less than 80 %)‐bare soil on eroded area
14GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
‐herbaceous on eroded area
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result ConclusionInterest for forest managers
Precise localization of eroded areas within reserves
Support managers in prioritization of
reforestation strategies
15GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result ConclusionInterest for forest managers
Support managers in prioritization of forest restoration strategies
(cutting fruit tree, promoting local(cutting fruit tree, promoting local species)
Precise localization of forested areas potentially degraded (due to agriculturaldegraded (due to agricultural
activity in this example)
16GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Conclusion
=> OBIA is a suitable framework for exploitingmultisource information in segmentationmultisource information, in segmentationprocess as well as in the classification process
=> LiDAR data was found particularly favorable for characterizingf l d h fforest types in a tropical context, due to the information itprovides on canopy height and its heterogeneity
17GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result Conclusion
Outlook=> discriminating forest types according to their composition> discriminating forest types according to their composition (deciduous, evergreen or mixed)
we have attempted in this study with these data but …we have attempted in this study with these data but …
Spot 5 satellite image was not acquiredh i bl d (J h) f
A hi h di t i h t it
at the suitable date (June month) fordiscriminating deciduous to evergreen
A high radiometric heterogeneitybetween the numerous orthophotos
A High presence of shadows onA High presence of shadows onorthophotos
Exploring more radiometric VHSR images acquired at suitable period
18GEOBIA 2012 May 7‐9, 2012 ‐ Rio de Janeiro ‐ Brazil
p g g q pand acquisition conditions : quickbird or pleiades images for example
Context Objective Data Pre‐processing Method Result ConclusionGEOBIA 2012GEOBIA 2012
Ri d J i B ilRi d J i B ilRio de Janeiro BrazilRio de Janeiro Brazil
OBIA for combining OBIA for combining LiDARLiDAR and multispectral data to and multispectral data to characterize forested areas and land cover in tropical region characterize forested areas and land cover in tropical region
StéphaneStéphane [email protected]@[email protected]@cirad.fr
GérardGérard LainéLainéThierry TormosThierry Tormos
Thanks for your attention!Thanks for your attention!