on the quantitative effects

5
International Journal of Modern Physics and Application International Journal of Modern Physics and Application International Journal of Modern Physics and Application International Journal of Modern Physics and Application 2014; 1(3): 38-42 Published online September 20, 2014 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/ijmpa) Keywords The Theory of Relativity, Absolute Space-Time Theory, Quantitative Effects, Analytic Method of Effect Energy, Quantum Effects Received: August 25, 2014 Revised: September 01, 2014 Accepted: September 02, 2014 On the quantitative effects Chang-Wei Hu Beijing Relativity Theory Research Federation Shanghai Branch China Email address [email protected] Citation Chang-Wei Hu. On the Quantitative Effects. International Journal of Modern Physics and Application. Vol. 1, No. 3, 2014, pp. 38-42. Abstract The physical phenomena what modern physics describes seem all very peculiar, which results from the quantitative effects deviating from the absolute space-time theory. The absolute space-time theory, which describes the world with invariable space-time standards, is a fundamental space-time theory; while actual space-time standards can vary with environment, and thus, the actual measuring data are always to deviate from the absolute space-time theory and the quantitative effects occur. A light is the most exact tool measuring space-time in the modern physics, whose space-time standards have a variability and leads up to the quantitative effects such as relativistic and quantum effects. The relativistic equations of the quantitative effects and the analytic method of effect energy are proposed, they can be used to describe relativistic phenomena simply. 1. Introduction In physical world, it is considered generally that a mathematical model in accord with experimental data reflects the truth of thing. Actually it must necessarily be so. The meaning of many things are becoming more and more clear along with the development of science, but the meaning of some things even are becoming more and more fuzzy, the time and space are just such. The space, time and mass are the most foundational physical quantity in classical physics, where the three dimensional space is the stage, the one dimensional time is the process and the objects (the matter with mass) are the performers, they are interrelated as well as independent each other. Such a description accords with human sensation. The theory of relativity changed the space-time theory of classical physics, it believes that the space and time can vary with velocity or gravitational potential, and the space-time may be bent, which give us a feel that look at oneself in the distorting mirror. The concepts of space and time even are blurred by the statistical interpretation of the wave function, the uncertainty relation and so on in the quantum theory, where the physical quantities including space and time all are replaced by the unpredictable operators. The space even is described into a high dimensional world in the theories of supersymmetry and extra dimension etc[1][2]., in which there are invisible many dimensional spaces except the visible three dimensional spaces. Consequently, even some consider that the concept of space and time are the phantasms, say, they apply only to the macroscopic as having statistical essence as temperature[3]. But space and time exist everywhere, can we leave the space-time in reality? Why are the space and time with universality becoming more and more elusive along with the development of physics? Some would say: the world is complicated originally, human understanding is always from the simple to the complicated. It is right only half of this word, in fact, humanity can turn a theory from the complicated into the simple on a new theoretical highness. I have pointed out[4] that the absolute and relativistic space-time theories are two different space-time theories in nature, and

Upload: don-hass

Post on 17-Aug-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

The physical phenomena what modern physics describes seem all very peculiar, which results from the quantitative effects deviating from the absolute space-time theory.

TRANSCRIPT

International Journal of Modern Physics and Application International Journal of Modern Physics and Application International Journal of Modern Physics and Application International Journal of Modern Physics and Application 2014; 1(3): 38-42 Published online September 20, 2014 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/ijmpa) Keywords The Theory of Relativity, Absolute Space-Time Theory, Quantitative Effects, Analytic Method of Effect Energy, Quantum Effects Received: August 25, 2014 Revised: September 01, 2014 Accepted: September 02, 2014 On the quantitative effects Chang-Wei Hu Beijing Relativity Theory Research Federation Shanghai Branch China Email address [email protected] Citation Chang-Wei Hu. On the Quantitative Effects. International Journal of Modern Physics and Application. Vol. 1, No. 3, 2014, pp. 38-42. Abstract The physical phenomena what modern physics describes seem all very peculiar, which results from the quantitative effects deviating from the absolute space-time theory. The absolutespace-timetheory,whichdescribestheworldwithinvariablespace-time standards, is a fundamental space-time theory; while actual space-time standards can vary with environment, and thus, the actual measuring data are always to deviate from the absolute space-time theory and the quantitative effects occur. A lightisthemost exacttoolmeasuringspace-time inthemodern physics,whosespace-timestandards haveavariabilityandleadsuptothequantitativeeffectssuchasrelativisticand quantumeffects. The relativisticequationsof the quantitative effects and the analytic methodofeffectenergyareproposed,theycanbeusedtodescriberelativistic phenomena simply. 1. Introduction Inphysicalworld,itisconsideredgenerallythatamathematicalmodelinaccord with experimental data reflects the truth of thing.Actuallyitmustnecessarily be so. Themeaningofmanythingsarebecomingmoreandmoreclearalongwiththe development of science, but the meaning of some things even are becoming more and more fuzzy, the time and space are just such. Thespace,timeandmassarethemostfoundationalphysicalquantityinclassical physics, where the three dimensional space is the stage, the one dimensional time is the process and the objects (the matter with mass) are the performers, they are interrelated as well as independent each other. Such a description accords with human sensation. The theory of relativity changed the space-time theory of classical physics, it believes thatthespaceandtimecanvarywithvelocityorgravitationalpotential,andthe space-timemaybebent,whichgiveusafeelthatlookatoneselfinthedistorting mirror. The concepts of space and time even are blurred by the statistical interpretation of the wave function, the uncertainty relation and so on in the quantum theory, where the physical quantities including space and time all are replaced by the unpredictable operators. The space even is described into a high dimensional world in the theories of supersymmetryandextradimensionetc[1][2].,inwhichthereareinvisiblemany dimensionalspacesexceptthevisiblethreedimensionalspaces.Consequently,even some consider thatthe concept of space and time are the phantasms,say, they apply only to the macroscopic as having statistical essence as temperature[3]. But space and time exist everywhere, can we leave the space-time in reality? Whyarethespaceandtimewithuniversalitybecomingmoreandmoreelusive alongwiththedevelopmentofphysics?Somewouldsay:theworldiscomplicated originally,humanunderstandingisalwaysfromthesimpletothecomplicated.Itis right only half of this word, in fact, humanity can turn a theory from the complicated into the simple on a new theoretical highness. I have pointed out[4] that the absolute and relativistic space-time theories are two different space-time theories in nature, and 39Chang-Wei Hu:On the Quantitative Effects proposedtheideaofthequantitativeeffects,whichcan simplifytheunderstandingtothemodernphysicstosome extent. Theabsolutespace-timetheory,whichdescribesthe worldwithaninvariablespace-timestandards,canbe thoughtasthemostfoundationalspace-timetheory. However, the actual standard tools of length and time, such asrulers,clocksandlight,canvarywiththeenvironment due to temperature, velocity and gravitational potential.The physics is a experimental science, its theoretical data should accordwiththeexperimentaldata.Thus,therearealways certain differences between the physical quantitative relation andtheabsolutespace-timetheory.Theeffectscausedby this differences are called quantitative effects, which are the insignificantintheconditionoflowvelocityorthe macroscopic,otherwisetheywouldbecomeobvious.Both oftherelativisticandquantumeffectsarethequantitative effects,thatistosay,theyaretheresultsthattheactual quantitativerelationsdeviatefromtheabsolutespace-time theory.Then,whatthemodernphysicsdescribesarethe quantitative effects on the basis of classical physics. It is the quantitative effects that twist the physical description. 2. Two ifferent !"ace#Time Theories in $ature Thequantitativeeffectsrelatetospace-time,letusstate begin with the Newtonian space-time theory. Newtonianspace-timetheoryiscalledtheabsolute space-time theory. Newton said[5]: I do not define time, space, place and motion, as being wellknowntoall.OnlyImustobserve,thatthevulgar conceive those quantities under no other notions but from the relation they bear to sensible objects. And thence arise certainprejudices,fortheremovingofwhich,itwillbe convenient to distinguish them into absolute and relative, true and apparent, mathematical and common. Absolute,true,andmathematicaltime,ofitself,and fromitsownnatureflowsequablywithoutregardto anything external, and by another name is called duration; relative,apparent,andcommontime,issomesensible and external (whether accurate or unequable) measure of duration by the means of motion, which is commonly used instead of true time ; such as an hour, a day, a month, a year. Absolutespace,initsownnature,withoutregardto anything external, remains always similar and immovable. Relative space is some movable dimension or measure of the absolute spaces. Fortheabovesaying,thereareabsolutespace-timeas wellastherelativespace-timeintheabsolutespace-time theory.Measuringisacourseofcomparisonbetween measuringtoolandmeasuredbody,andtheabsolutespace andtimecannotbemeasureddirectlybecausetheyhave nothing to do with matter and its motion. Therefore physical space-timeareallthemeasurablerelativespace-time,and weknowtheabsolutespace-timethroughtherelative space-time.Then,whatisthemostfoundational characteristicoftheabsolutespace-timetheory?Itisthe invariability of space-time standards, which leads to the each independenceofspaceandtime,andbothofthemhave nothing to do with material environment. Anintuitionofindividualpersonororganizationis unreliable generally, and it is probable that the human total intuition is just the truth. The as being well known to all is like an axiom. The absolutespace-time theory,which is an axiominclassicalphysics,canberegardedasthemost foundational space-time theory. Owing to the invariability of space-timestandards,everywherewecanestablisharigid threedimensionalcoordinatesystemandonedimension timeaxis,whicharejustamathematicalexpressionofa relativespace-timeintheabsolutespace-timetheory.The mathematical expression of absolute space-time theory is the Galileantransformationwheretheintervalsofspaceand timearetheconstantquantity,namelytheinvariabilityof space and time standards. The general measuring-rods and clocks can vary with the temperature,whichcannotbebelievedthatthespaceand timearechangingbecausepeoplemayprovethatthese changesareonlythechangesofthemeasuring-rodsand clocks themselves with more accurate space-time measuring tools.Thescientistswouldtakethechangesofspace-time standardsasthechangesofspace-timeitselfifthemost exact space-time measuring tool can change. Thelightvelocityistheknownmostquickvelocity spreading information. Now the most accurate standards of length and time are defined by light. For example, a metre, the SI unit of length, being the length of the path travelled by lightinvacuumduringatimeintervalof 1/(299,792,458108)second[6],wherethelengthofthe pathtraveledbylightinvacuumduringatimeintervalof one second is always 299792458 meters whether it is fast or slow, the light speed become an invariable definitional speed. The modern physics is just established on the basis of such a space-timestandard,whichmeanswhatthemodernphysis describesarethequantitativeeffectswithlightasthe measureofspace-time.Wecanimaginethereisastanding wavefixedonamovingbody,itswavelengthwould contractobservedinthestationarysystemalongwithan increase of the velocity, and it is contracted into a point when the velocity of this body reach the light velocity. An observer in the stationary system, he would consider that the distance traveledbylightinaunittimeisdecreased,orthetime becomesslowerinmovingsystemthanitinthestationary system if the light velocity is invariable. Taking a change of the space-time standard as a change of space-time itself is a practicable mathematical modelinthe modern physics. The description on the basis of absolute space-time theory iscalledabsolutedescription;andthedescriptiononthe basis of experimental data is called quantitative description. International Journal of Modern Physics and Application 2014; 1(3): 38-4240 Thequantitativeeffectsarecausedbythedifference between these two descriptions. %. The &uantitative Effects of 'elativity Thetheoryofrelativityisatheoryofthequantitative descriptionandtherelativisticeffectsarethequantitative effects. The theory of relativity, in fact, does not depart from theabsolutespace-timetheorybecauseitexplainshowthe space-timestandardchangeswiththehelpoftheproper quantities, and according to the explanation that a rigid three dimensionalcoordinatesystemandonedimensionaltime axisarejustamathematicalexpressionofarelative space-timeintheabsolutespace-timetheory,theproper quantitiesintherelativityarethequantitiesofabsolute description. The coordinate system and time axis in the relativity are nonrigid,andcanvarywithvelocityorgravitational potential.Thespecialtheoryofrelativityshowsthatina inertiaframeofreference,therelationshipsbetweenunit lengthdr or unit timedt and velocityv areasinEqs. (1) and (2): 02 21 /dtdtv c=,(1) 2 201 / dr v c dr = ,(2) Where 0dr and 0dt aretheproperunitlengthandtime, respectively. They do not vary with velocity and are used to measure the change of space-time standards on an objects in relativemotionwithanyvelocity.Thus,theyaretheunit lengthandtimeintheabsolutedescriptiononthisinertia frame of reference, and Eqs.(1) and (2) are the equations of quantitative effects in the special theory of relativity. Similarly,thegeneraltheoryofrelativitystatesthatthe unit lengthdr or unit timedt can vary with gravitational potential.Asimpleexpressioncanbeobtainedwiththe equivalentprincipleandconservationofenergy:Letan object whose initial velocity is zero falls freely in an isolated gravitationalfieldofastar.Whenitisadistancer away fromthestar,itsvelocityisv ,andthegravitational potentialis , which is zero when it is infinitely far away from the star. Then, 2102mv m + =i.e., 212v = (3) Substituting (3) into (1) and (2) gives 0 02 21 2 / 1 2 /dt dtdtc GM c r = =+ (4) 2 20 01 2 / 1 2 / dr c dr GM c rdr = + = (5) Eqs.(4)and(5)areidenticalwiththeresultsofthe Schwarzschild solution in the general theory of relativity[7]. The 0dtand 0drin(4)and(5)aretheunitlengthand unittimeonthereferenceframethatisfarawayfromthe gravitationalfield.Theydonotvarywiththegravitational potential; that is, they are the unit length and unit time in the absolutedescription.Eqs.(4)and(5)aretheequationsof quantitative effects in the general theory of relativity. Theequationsofquantitativeeffectscanbeusedto explainrelativisticphenomenasimply.Twoexamplesare given below. The experiment on the delay of radar echo showed that the velocityoflightbecomesslowerinagravitationalfield, whichcanbesolvedsimplyusingEqs.(4)and(5):the relationbetweenthevelocitiesofthequantitative description ( / dr dt ) and the absolute description(0 0/ dr dt) is 22 00 0201 2 // (1 2 / ) // 1 2 /c drdr dt c dr dtdt c+= = ++(6) Let the velocity of light without the gravitational field be c. Then,thevelocityoflightwithunitof 0 0/ dr dtinthe gravitational field is 20 22(1 2 / ) (1 )GMc c c cc r = + = ( )0 0/ dr dt (7) Eq.(7)isidenticaltotheresultofthegeneraltheoryof relativity[8]. Obviously,theconclusionthatthevelocityoflight becomesslowerinagravitationalfieldisanabsolute description, which is the result of measuring the velocity of lightoverthewholegravitationalfieldwithaninvariable space-timestandard,say,thespace-timestandardonthe earth. Quantitatively, the principle of the invariability of the velocity of light is still established in the gravitational field becausewherethestandardsofspace-timecanvarywith gravitationalpotential.Usingthequantitativespace-time standard of one point to measure the velocity of light of this point,accordingto(6),ifthequantitativeunit / dr dt is substitutedfortheabsoluteunit 0 0/ dr dtin(7),thenthe velocityoflightisalwaysconstantc.Thereforethe invariabilityoflightvelocityisaquantitativeeffect,and therearecertaincomplementaritiesbetweenabsoluteand quantitative descriptions. Asforthegravitationalredshift,itisbecausethe space-time standards can vary with gravitational potential. A.Einsteinpointedoutthatthefrequencyoflight corresponds to the time frequency of a clock[9]. According to (4), it is 41Chang-Wei Hu:On the Quantitative Effects 021 2 /vvGM c r=(8) Equation(8)showsthatthefrequencyoflightcanvary with the gravitational potential. If the vector radii of a light beam are1r and2r successively in a gravitational field, it can be shown that 22 12211 2 /1 2 /GM c r vvGM c r=(9) Equation (9) is the formula of the gravitational red shift of spectral-line in the Schwarzschild geometry[8]. (. The Analytic )ethod of Effect Ener*y Accordingtothemass-energyrelation 2E mc = ,the relativisticmass-velocityequation 02 21 /mmv c=canbe turn into energy-velocity equation: 200 22 2(1 )21 /E vE Ecv c= +(10) Substituting (3) into (10) gives 00 0 2 22(1 ) 11 2 /E MGE E Ec c rc = = + +(11) Eqs.(10)and(11)showthattheenergyofarelativistic bodymayberesolvedintoproperenergy0E ofproper motionandeffectenergy 20 22vEcor 0 2GMEc rofeffect motion, where the proper energy is the energy in the absolute description;whiletheeffectenergyisaenergycausedby quantitative effects. The effect motion is only a quantitative effect,whichcannotchangethesystemofpropermotion, andyetit can only change the systems direction of proper motion. Such a analytic method is called analytic method of effectenergy,whichisarecognizedfashiontoquantitative effect.Isthisanalyticmethodeffective?Letustryto calculate the precession of a planet perihelion with it. The system of proper motion of a planet is the ellipse, its effectenergydoesnotchangetheformofthisellipse,and onlymakeswholeellipserotatedslowly,namelythe precession. Calculatingalongtheorbitofaplanet,theangular displacementbetweentwoadjacentperiheliais + 2 , wherethe istheprecessionangle.Heretheenergyof ellipticmotionsystemistheproperenergy,andthe precession is caused by effect energy, which rolls ellipse as a whole.Theprecessionenergyisaextrakineticenergyof angulardirection,anditsdirectionisidenticalwiththe kineticenergyofangulardirectionofpropermotion.Then theprecessionanglecanbederivedsimple:toderivethe ratio of angular direction kinetic energy between precession andpropermotion,andthus,applyingtheanalyticmethod ofeffectenergy,theprecessionanglecanbeobtainedin proportion when the planet accomplishes a periods elliptic motion. Forcircularorbit,allofkineticenergyaretheangular directionkineticenergy,whosevalueishalfofpotential energybecausethegravitationalacceleration22v GMar r= =, which leads to 21 12 2GMmv mr=. Therefore angular direction kinetic energy of a planet is 130E(0Eis the sum of energy of proper motion). For elliptic orbit, part of kinetic energy is the radial direction kinetic energy,which has nothing to do withangulardirectionmotion.Whentheplanetliestoan aphelion, its kinetic energy is the least 2( )GMma c +; when the planetliestoaperihelion,itskineticenergyisthelargest 2( )GMma c , then the average kinetic energy of elliptic motion is: ( )21 1 14 2 1GMmGMma c a c a e + = + ,( e isthe eccentricity);whilethekineticenergyofcircularmotion with radiusa is 2GMma, which is 21 e times as much as theaveragekineticenergyofellipticmotionwithlong axis a .Thereforetheangulardirectionkineticenergyof proper motion is approximately 2013eE. According to the the analytic method of effect energy, the angulardirectionkineticenergyoftheplanetprecessionis 0 2Ec , while that of proper motion is 2013eE, the ratio of them is ( )2 231 c e . Therefore when the planet accomplishes a periods elliptic motion ( 2 ), the angle of precession is ( )2 2 2 22 3 6(1 ) 1GMac e c e = = (12) whichisidenticalwiththeformulathatisderivedbythe general theory of relativity[8], which shows that the analytic method of effect energy is effective. +. &uantum Effect, a &uantitative Effect in )icrosco"ic !ystem The quantum mechanics was established on the basis of a series of experiments. Therefore the quantum effect would is aquantitativeeffectIt.Letusmakesomeanalysesfrom International Journal of Modern Physics and Application 2014; 1(3): 38-4242 different angles below. Applying the analytic method of effect energy to uniform motioninastraightline,itseffectmotioncanonlybea transverse vibration or the spin whose direction is parallel to themoving direction because its proper motion systemis a straightline.Istheresuchaneffectmotion? Macroscopically it seems not probable, but it is only too true microscopicallybecausethemicroscopicparticlesall possessthewave-particledualityandintrinsicspin,which may be regarded as the manifestations of quantitative effects in microscopic system. Moreover the Schrodinger equation is a semi-qualitative, semi-quantitativeandnon-relativistictheory,itcanderive the quantization of some physical quantities, but the spin is placedintothetheoreticalframeworkasanadditional degreeoffreedom;whileDiracequation,arelativistic equation of quantum mechanics, includes automatically the spinquantumnumberofparticles[10],whichindicates further that the quantization of intrinsic spin of a particle is a reflectionofthequantitativeeffectofthespecialtheoryof relativity in the microscopic system Theinvariabilityoflightvelocityisamostbasic relativistic quantitative effect, which means that any photon modelwouldhavecertaincommonnature,weassumethat one period of a high-frequency lightwave is a photon, and theelectromagneticamplitudeofanyphotonisidentical quantitatively.Attentionplease,low-frequency electromagnetic waves one period is not one photon, which relatestothemicroscopicstructureofaphysicalvacuum, and it does not be made discussion in this paper. Ihadpointedoutthatthelightisasecondsoundinthe superfluidofmacroscopic physical vacuum, whose density is homogeneous and isotropic in quantitative description[4]. As is known to all, the average value of energy density of a wave is 2 22A = , where the is the density of a medium,theA isamplitudeandthe iscircular frequency.Inavacuum,the andA aretheconstant quantitatively,thenthe isonlyrelatedto , 2 . Ontheotherhand,Asinglephotonistheplanepolarized wave, and the area of a photon is inversely proportional to its frequency, therefore the energy of a photon isE v , thus,E hv = ( h is the Planck constant). -. Conclusion Physicalspace-timeismeasurablerelativespace-time. Thetheoryofabsolutespace-time,whichincludesthe relativespace-time,describestheworldwithainvariable space-timestandarditcanberegardedasafoundational space-time theory;while modernphysics describe physical phenomona with light as the measure of space-time, whose standards are variable,andthus,whatthemodernphysics describesdeviatefromtheabsolutespace-timetheoryin quantityandthequantitativeeffectsincludingthe relativistic and quantum effectsoccur. The proper quantities intherelativityaretheparticularquantitiesofabsolute description.Therearecertaincomplementaritiesbetween the absolute and quantitative descriptions. Inthefinalanalysis,thequantitativeeffectsrusult fromthefunctionofphysicalvacuum:thespace-time standardscanvarywiththedensityofphysical vacuum[4].A.EinsteinbelievedthatGoddoesnotplay dice.Heisrightinessence,buthedoesnotknowthe existenceofquantitativeeffects.Whatthequantitative experimentssustainaretheviewpointsofN.Bohrbecause quantitativeexperimentsincludetheresultsofquantitative effects.Ifwefoundamethodofmeasuringspace-time which is uninfluenced by physical vacuum, weshould have a new space-time theory. Objectively, the space is three dimensional,and the time isonedimensional.Therelativisticandquantumeffects resultfromthequantitativeeffects.Asforsocalledhigh dimensionalspacesaretotakesomeindependentphysical parametersasthespaces,whichareonlymathematical models and not real spaces, just as the isospin space is not a realspaceandisamathematicalmodeldescribingthe chargeindependenceofnuclearforce.Foraccordingwith thefacts,thesehigherdimensionaltheoriesstressthatthe spaces higher than three dimensions are the invisible due to the compactification or strong bend[2]. Moreover the duality relationshipsbetweenthetheoriesoftendimensional superstring and eleven dimensional supergravity confuse the concept of dimension and show that these higher dimensions are not real dimensions of the space. The physics does not depart from the mathematics, but a quantitativerelationshipisonlyapresentation.the mathematics can not replace the physics. 'eferences [1]S. T. Yan, S. Nadis, The Shape of Inner Space, Brockman Inc (2010). [2]L. Randail, Warped Passages, Penguin Press (2006). [3]B.Greene,TheFabric of theCosmos:Space,Timeandthe Texture of Reality, Penguin Press (2004). [4]C.W.Hu,Vacuum,Space-Time,MatterandModelsof SmarandacheGeometry,EducationalPublishers,USA (2012). [5]I.Newton,TheMathematicalPrinciplesofNatural Philosophy, Daniel Adee, New-york (1846). [6]A Dictionary of Physics, Oxford, New York, 2009 [7]J.D.Walecka,IntroductiontoModernPhysicsTheoretical Foundation, Word Scientific PublisingCo, Lodon(2008) [8]H. C. Ohanian, R. Ruffini, Gravitation and Spacetime, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. (1994). [9]A. Einstein, Relativity The Special and The General Theory, Methuen & Co. Ltd, London,(1955). [10]R.K.Su,QuantumMechanics,HigherEducationPress, Beijing (2002)