open library

http://flic.kr/p/4Pg28f

Hello.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

My name is George Oates, and I’m leading the Open Library project.

http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/exhibitions/Fantasy_to_Federation/Bellin1753.jpg


By way of

Introduction


http://www.flickr.com/photos/dork/4040497259/Wednesday, February 3, 2010

The Open Library project is produced out of the Internet Archive. We recently moved in to this church in The Richmond in San Francisco. We’re all dreaming about ways we might be able to transform it into a library.



Universal Access toAll Knowledge


Since 1996, the non-profit Internet Archive has been building a digital library of Internet sites and other things in digital form. archive.org has a ton of texts, video, software, live music... all sorts of things.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/george/3481337237/Wednesday, February 3, 2010

We have many computers.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nationallibrarynz_commons/3326203787/


web.archive.org Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Browse through over 150 billion web pages archived from 1996 to a few months ago.

http://web.archive.org

http://web.archive.org

archive-it.orgWednesday, February 3, 2010

Archive-It, a subscription service from the Internet Archive, allows institutions to build and preserve collections of born digital content. Collections are hosted at the Internet Archive data center and are accessible to the public with full-text search. If you’re interested, you can see live demos online - the times are listed on the main page there.

nasaimages.orgWednesday, February 3, 2010

NASA Images was created through a partnership with NASA to bring public access to NASA's image, video, and audio collections in a single, searchable resource.

archive.org/details/textsWednesday, February 3, 2010

1.8MM books

http://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchive/330205088/Wednesday, February 3, 2010

- Many of our scanned books are delivered on the One Laptop Per Child machines...



openlibrary.orgWednesday, February 3, 2010

The Open Library project is about 3 years old, and its overarching goal for is to have a page on the web for every book ever published.

We have gathered about 30 million edition records (23 million are available through the site now) from people like the Library of Congress, University of Toronto, TALIS, San Francisco Public Library and others, with more on the way. We have built a database infrastructure and the wiki interface, and you can search millions of book records, narrow results by facet, and search across the full text of about 1.8 million scanned books.

Wandered into The Library.

What did I find?


I started about 8 months ago. I am a web designer by trade, mostly ignorant of the practice of librarianship and cataloging. In fact, I’d just come from the world of folksonomy at Flickr. No classification systems, full of humans and gorgeous photography.

• Dense library metadata

• Designed for classic institutional search/retrieve practice

• Data is very “dry”, often of poor quality Only title and author, for example

• No insight into the community

Hmm...


Coming in cold... so... what am I dealing with here?

Good!• Loads of data > 23 million edition records

• Small user base < 20,000

• Small team 4 people + 2 advisors

• Small architecture 12 servers

• Flexible framework infogami, web.py


- But, there were also some good things!!

http://flic.kr/p/6xCJQS

Understand relationships


So, what have we got, and how does it all inter-relate?

Any relationship can be made into a hyperlink.




Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records. FRBR.

This is my attempt to understand it. By renaming things :)




Sketches, sketches, sketches



What does it mean to be an

Open Library?


Open to

Exploration



At a guess, ~95% of ins2tu2onal online collec2ons begin with a search UI


‐ There’s a presump2on of knowledge, not encouragement of explora2on‐ How do I know what to search for if I don’t know what you’ve got?

24OBJECTS - MEANS - REASONSRules for a Dictionary Catalogue, Charles A. Cutter. 1904, Page 12.


Charles CuJer: Rules for a Dic2onary Catalog ‐ par2cularly interested to hear that a librarian should righNully expect their patrons to have a 2tle, author or subject in mind.





25


The trouble was, with many Open Library records, there just wasn’t much there... virtually useless?

26


Records in isola2on have no story to tell, nothing to engage with, nothing to explore. Nothing to navigate.

27


28


Wait a minute... what are these things?

29


30


Catalog as

Landscape?http://www.flickr.com/photos/nov03/3639455345/




http://flickr.com/photos/tupwanders/3356077817/

Deconstruction


I’ve learned a wee bit about the history of library metadata... And museum metadata for that matter.... It seems like the 1960s are a bit of a blight for human understanding, since that’s the time when we got all excited about computers and their processing power, and seemingly overwrote a lot of the crafty, poetic description and allusion...

What happens if you blow everything up?



LEADER: 01378cam 2200373I 4500001 ocmocm01143845003 OCoLC005 19951211171151.0008 750117r19531945nyu 000 1 eng u019 $a4338553040 $cSLC$dOCL$dTXA$dSFR$dOCoLC049 $aSFRA092 $aF$bSaLinger 1953100 1 $aSalinger, J. D.$q(Jerome David),$d1919-245 14 $aThe catcher in the rye.260 $a[New York] :$bNew American Library,$c[1953, c1951]300 $a192 p.$c18 cm.490 0 $aSignet book,$vD1667500 $aReprint of the 1945 ed. published by Little, Brown, Boston.590 $aBarbara Grier and Donna McBride collection.650 0 $aTeenage boys$vFiction.650 0 $aBrothers and sisters$vFiction.650 0 $aPreparatory schools$vFiction.650 4 $aAlienation in teenagers$vFiction.650 4 $aTeenage boys$xInterpersonal relations$vFiction.650 4 $aEmotionally disturbed teenage boys$vFiction.690 $aBarbara Grier and Donna McBride collection.655 4 $aQueer pulps.907 $a.b15331775$b10-24-07$c07-20-03998 $axsf$b07-01-03$cm$da$e-$feng$gnyu$h4$i1935 $aADM-9576907 $a.b15331775$b02-23-04$c07-20-03998 $axsf$b07-01-03$cm$da$e-$feng$gnyu$h4$i1945 $aF SaLinger 1953$g1$i31223037153153$lxsfgl$o-$p$0.00$q-$rc$so$t1$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i25499191$z08-05-03


- I don’t want Open Library to jettison librarianship, or neglect to acknowledge the brilliant hard work of librarians over the years...- You could argue that this sort of computer-y librarianship (or any type of “educated classification”) was (perhaps unintentionally) designed to obscure the personal... the practical... the human

- How might we adapt or extend (or revert?) this librarians’ work to appeal to a broader audience?- Let’s see what happens when you explode Library of Congress Subject Headings. This data isn’t even in Open Library - we borrowed it from loc.gov then pulled out the dynamite...

650 0 $aTeenage boys$vFiction.650 0 $aBrothers and sisters$vFiction.650 0 $aPreparatory schools$vFiction.650 4 $aAlienation in teenagers$vFiction.650 4 $aTeenage boys$xInterpersonal relations$vFiction.650 4 $aEmotionally disturbed teenage boys$vFiction.




650 0 $aTeenage boys$vFiction.650 0 $aBrothers and sisters$vFiction.650 0 $aPreparatory schools vFiction.650 0 $aAlienation in teenagers vFiction.650 0 $aTeenage boys$xInterpersonal relations vFiction.650 0 $aEmotionally disturbed teenage boys vFiction.




Teenage boys, Fiction, Brothers and sisters, Preparatory schools, Alienation in teenagers, Teenage boys, Interpersonal relations, Emotionally disturbed teenage boys





So, we’ve exploded all the subject headings into constituent parts, retaining their types (subject, person, place, time, work, org etc), and made them searchable. You can see here a search for any subjects that mention Brothers and Sisters


Looking at the subject page, you can see the Works with the most editions in the top panel, with a handy indicator to tell you if you can read an electronic version....


If I scroll down...we’ve collated all the publish dates of all the editions with that subject


And, we can also display subjects that are used most often in conjunction with “Brothers and Sisters”, as well as the authors who write most about them, and publishers who publish books about them


We can also collect subjects together at the author level. Here you can see what sorts of subjects Salinger writes about...


Subjects related to J. D. Salinger - note that we’ve retained the Place/Person/Time categories, but it’s likely we’ll fold Orgs, Works etc into the more general subject bucket.


Incidentally, my colleague Lance Arthur popped in and updated the Salinger record with a note of his death.

“Books, even after they have been given a shelf and a number, retain a mobility of their own. Left to their own devices, they assemble in unexpected formations; they follow secret rules of similarity, unchronicled genealogies, common interests and themes.”

Alberto Manguel, The Library at NightPage 163, “The Library as Chance”


“Books, even after they have been given a shelf and a number, retain a mobility of their own. Left to their own devices, they assemble in unexpected formations; they follow secret rules of similarity, unchronicled genealogies, common interests and themes.”

Alberto Manguel, The Library at NightPage 163, “The Library as Chance”


Here are some other interesting examples...

Civil War, 1861-1865


Wok Cookery


I’m not sure about you, but I certainly remember the Oates family’s first wok. We tried. Oh, how we tried.

Streets



Any guesses as to this subject?

La Comète de Halley!



Every 75 or 76 years, people write about it again :)


Place and subject?Wondering about whether or not you could actually stand on the surface of Halley’s Comet... Is that a helpful classification of a place?

Which leads me on to the next chapter - a sort of radical exposure...

Open to

Exposure


“Library metadata is diabolically rational.”

Karen Coyle, kcoyle.net


http://flic.kr/p/v5uNzWednesday, February 3, 2010

The act of adding a book to a library catalog is a bit like playing tetris.




- incidentally, there were only 2 matches for the singular “gold mine”- usage volume of any particular heading is indicated by the order of the list. most books == most used heading- i wonder if these lists could help to normalise heading usage somehow... if that’s what we want to do, of course...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/blackbeltjones/4294354526/Wednesday, February 3, 2010

We’ve noticed a TON of minor variations in the way cataloguers enter data... Trivial to us, but very hard for computers to differentiate

http://www.flickr.com/photos/eyeliam/2562666943/


U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 127 books Forest Products Laboratory, 50 books Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 38 books U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 37 books U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, 30 books Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 13 booksU.S. Forest Products Laboratory, 10 booksDept. of Agriculture, 7 books


Prolific authors on the subject of Woodhttp://upstream.openlibrary.org/subjects/wood

So, diabolically rational, and yet, pretty inconsistent, when you can see it in the aggregate like this.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Forest%20Products%20Laboratory%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Forest%20Products%20Laboratory%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Dept.%20of%20Agriculture,%20Forest%20Service,%20Forest%20Products%20Laboratory%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Dept.%20of%20Agriculture,%20Forest%20Service,%20Forest%20Products%20Laboratory%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture,%20Forest%20Service%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture,%20Forest%20Service%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Forest%20Products%20Laboratory,%20Forest%20Service,%20U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Forest%20Products%20Laboratory,%20Forest%20Service,%20U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22U.S.%20Forest%20Products%20Laboratory%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22U.S.%20Forest%20Products%20Laboratory%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Pacific%20Southwest%20Forest%20and%20Range%20Experiment%20Station,%20Forest%20Service,%20U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?q=publisher_facet:%22Pacific%20Southwest%20Forest%20and%20Range%20Experiment%20Station,%20Forest%20Service,%20U.S.%20Dept.%20of%20Agriculture%22+AND+subject_facet:%22Wood%22

Norton 5,072 booksW.W. Norton 2,371 booksW. W. Norton & Company 2,320 booksW. W. Norton 1,577 booksW W Norton & Co Inc 933 booksW W Norton & Co Ltd 824 booksW.W. Norton & Co. 490 booksW.W. Norton & Company 281 booksDistributed by W.W. Norton 269 booksW W Norton & Co Inc (Np) 207 booksJeffrey Norton Pub 151 booksNorton*(ww Norton Co 144 booksW. W. Norton & company, inc. 124 booksW. W. Norton & Co. 120 booksW.W.Norton 112 booksW.W. Norton & Company, inc. 85 booksDistributed by W.W. Norton & Co. 65 booksW W Norton & Co (Sd) 63 booksW.W. Norton & company, inc. 54 booksDistributed to the book trade by W.W. Norton 52 booksW.W. Norton & Company, Inc. 51 booksW.W. Norton & Company Ltd 48 booksW. W. Norton & Company, inc. 46 books


Variants on a publisher’s name

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+Company

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Distributed+by+W.W.+Norton

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Distributed+by+W.W.+Norton

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W+W+Norton+%26+Co+Inc+%28Np%29

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W+W+Norton+%26+Co+Inc+%28Np%29

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Jeffrey+Norton+Pub

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Jeffrey+Norton+Pub

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Norton%2A%28ww+Norton+Co

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Norton%2A%28ww+Norton+Co

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.+W.+Norton+%26+company%2C+inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.+W.+Norton+%26+company%2C+inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.+W.+Norton+%26+Co.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.+W.+Norton+%26+Co.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.Norton

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.Norton

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+Company%2C+inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+Company%2C+inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Distributed+by+W.W.+Norton+%26+Co.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Distributed+by+W.W.+Norton+%26+Co.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W+W+Norton+%26+Co+%28Sd%29

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W+W+Norton+%26+Co+%28Sd%29

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+company%2C+inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+company%2C+inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Distributed+to+the+book+trade+by+W.W.+Norton

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=Distributed+to+the+book+trade+by+W.W.+Norton

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+Company%2C+Inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+Company%2C+Inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+Company+Ltd

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.W.+Norton+%26+Company+Ltd

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.+W.+Norton+%26+Company%2C+inc.

http://upstream.openlibrary.org/search?publisher=Norton&publisher_facet=W.+W.+Norton+%26+Company%2C+inc.


There’s also the issue of using old headings, for example, the sort of heading about a person that contains birth/death dates. Useful disambiguation information. But, what happens when they die?


For those of you who may be unaware, Mr. Bacon is no longer with us.


And it looks like 32 books know that.

History


Publish dates... I’m wondering if a cataloguing system had a required field somewhere...

History

?


Published in the future? Let alone nine thousand nine hundred and ninety nine?

“Build it so anyone can contribute any amount.”

Clay Shirky


So, the idea is, someone sees an error like those publishing dates, and can go into the record to correct them.


Admittedly, this is the editing history of a personal friend, Dinah Sander - who some of you may know - but, after seeing the history graphs with incorrect info - Dinah couldn’t stop herself from jumping in and removing the dodgy data.

Open to

Elaboration


http://flic.kr/p/4itJcB

Substrate:any surface on which a plant or animal lives or on which a material sticks


There’s also an alternate definition which suggests a substrate is catalytic; something that facilitates a reaction.



http://flic.kr/p/4itJcB

What if we consider the library records like that?


- The trick is, these records are like a new language. To use them and operate within them requires specific training. While this is not necessarily a bad thing, and experts are wonderful, it means that people like me (reasonably clever, been to Uni) can’t make use of them.- What we’ve tried to do is reveal the substrate; to show the landscape of librarianship and the beautiful work of classification that has been happening for centuries.- Using the data we already had in our catalog, and without colliding with the taxonomy/vs folksonomy issue.



Tension? http://flic.kr/p/6zyU3UWednesday, February 3, 2010

The Taxonomy vs Folksonomy debate may be represented thusly.

http://flic.kr/p/6zyU3U

http://flic.kr/p/6zyU3U

1) Books are for use.

2) Every reader his [or her] book.

3) Every book its reader.

4) Save the time of the User.

5) The library is a growing organism.


So, on the basis of the idea of our current catalog being a substrate, as Ranganathan suggests in his five laws of library science...

1) Books are for use.

2) Every reader his [or her] book.

3) Every book its reader.

4) Save the time of the User.

5) The library is a growing organism.


Some suggest that this last law was intended more as a pointer to a library’s physical space: its staff, its buildings, its shelves. I think it’s also useful to consider the law in the classification space, particularly if you imagine that the Open Library catalog today is effectively a substrate for further connections, elaboration and even corrections.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/curiousexpeditions/2406513532/Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Release the shackles!



http://flic.kr/p/38TZWednesday, February 3, 2010

What if a catalog looks like this? Is crystalline? What if it is unconstrained by the need to sort, say, alphabetically?

From the artist of this image, Jared Tarbell: “Lines like crystals form at perpendicular angles to existing lines. A complex form emerges. 1000 classic computational substrate, color palette stolen from Jackson Pollock: A simple perpendicular growth rule creates intricate city-like structures. The simple rule, the complex results, the enormous potential for modification; this has got to be one of my all time favorite self-discovered algorithms. Lines likes crystals grow on a computational substrate.”



Activity/History


One of the key components to any happy social system is the visibility of other people, and a sense of activity. This is one of the key elements we’re focussed on in the redesign. This particular list shows all edits by humans on Open Library, and actually, turns out to be a handy way to spot check what’s happening. You’ll notice too, there’s a special tab for the variety of edits that we run across the system using bots. Often pretty mechanical and repetitive, we found that the bots obscure the humans if you just mush everything up in a big list, so we separated them.


So, here’s an example of a record I happened to spot one day as I glanced through the Recent Activity list...


If you look closely, you’ll notice that apparently, this person believes the Collected Poems to be part of the “pooop” series... and that they enjoy bacon.


Open Library is a Wiki. That means that you can see the entire editing history of any one record, and easily undo any errors (or mischief).

http://www.flickr.com/photos/eyeliam/2562666943/Wednesday, February 3, 2010



Open to

Exchange


http://www.flickr.com/photos/emdot/400280705/

Shelf




http://www.flickr.com/photos/arenamontanus/352130655/

Network


The question is: Now that these records are online...how many things can we connect them to?




There are lots and lots of sites on the web that deal with bookish information. Goodreads, Librarything etc. Why not connect Open Library records to these sites too?


The Guardian, for example, also broadcasts !mely bookish information. We’re wondering how we might fold that in to providing jump points for people into Open Library...

“We shouldn't waste people's time making fixes that would be better done by machine.”

Edward Betts, Chief Data Munger, Open Library


Canonical ID?Collect them.


Canonical ID?Exchange them.


http://openlibrary.org/books/olid/OL7440033M

http://openlibrary.org/books/isbn/0385472579


http://openlibrary.org/books/lccn/93005405

http://openlibrary.org/books/oclc/28419896

http://openlibrary.org/books/id/240727

http://openlibrary.org/books/amazon/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/bookmooch/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/goodreads/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/ocaid/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/librarything/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/paperback_swap/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/Your ID Here/...


You can already ping Open Library with an ID other than the Open Library identifier to see if we have any matches.

http://openlibrary.org/books/




http://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/240727-S.jpg


http://covers.openlibrary.org/b/olid/OL7440033M-S.jpg














http://openlibrary.org/books/olid/OL7440033M



http://openlibrary.org/books/lccn/93005405

http://openlibrary.org/books/oclc/28419896

http://openlibrary.org/books/id/240727

http://openlibrary.org/books/amazon/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/bookmooch/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/goodreads/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/librarything/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/ocaid/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/paperback_swap/...

http://openlibrary.org/books/Your ID Here/...






















Looking

Forward


http://www.flickr.com/photos/genkigecko/3371739666/

Tools


Tools to help people help the data.




This is part of the list of Works by J. D. Salinger, which as you can see is far from perfect.Humans can spot in a moment that some of these should be blended. Computers? Not so much.


Similarly, with authors.



http://www.flickr.com/photos/cibi/3149659494/

Lists


- keep track of edits on things you’re interested in, or have edited- export a small subset of records (bibliography, MARC, XML etc)- provide another pivot for navigation in the networked catalog - “George has this book on her “Famous Cheeses” list”



http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=landscape&l=ccWednesday, February 3, 2010

Over time, the hope is that we’ll see a proliferation of different landscapes; different paths through the catalog...



http://www.flickr.com/photos/readinginpublic/3999260222/

Lending


Starting to investigate what it might mean to lend of out-of-print ebooks.If anyone would like to join in on that, please let me know.



http://flickr.com/photos/daveynin/560170975/http://www.flickr.com/photos/nationallibrarynz_commons/3326203787/

upstream.openlibrary.org


We still have a lot to do. I’ve shown you some of the muddiness in the catalog, probably mainly because our data is aggregated from a variety of systems. But, we think it’s a new way to look for a book to read, and that’s exciting! I hope you’ll take some time to poke around the new site. And please, do let me know what you think!



Thank You!George Oates, [email protected]

http://flickr.com/photos/roadsidepictures/244926428/Wednesday, February 3, 2010

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]



open library

Documents

22pacific20southwest20forest20and20range20experiment20station

fenggnyuh4i1935

t1u0v0w0x0

22forest20products20laboratory22

20forest20products20laboratory22

publisherfacetnorton2a28wwnortoncohttp

22forest20products20laboratory

20forest20service22