optical and electrical characterization of lipidbilayers ...agn2114/nagelyangsummer2011... · sijun...
TRANSCRIPT
Optical and Electrical Characterization of Lipid Bilayers on Various Substrates
Shepard GroupBioIGERT RPUAshley Nagel, Columbia UniversitySijun Yang, Cornell University
What is a lipid bilayer?How is it formed?How are they characterized?What substrates are used?What additional experiments are done?What are the project’s future directions &
eventual applications?
Contents
What is a lipid bilayer?A lipid consists of a hydrophilic
phosphate group head, and a
hydrophobic fatty acid tail.
Lipid Bilayers
Lipid Bilayers
Hydrophobic tails stick together to form liposomes, micelles, and bilayers (energetically favorable)
Lipid bilayers are what compose our cell membranes. Bilayers can be formed artificially as well.
Lipid Bilayers
Supported Lipid Bilayers Supported lipid bilayers are formed by collapsing liposomes onto a
hydrophilic substrate
Process is spontaneous
Lipid Bilayers
Transmembrane ProteinsOne of many functions of proteins is to transport molecules
and ions across the cell membrane
ATPase and Gramicidin are used in this project
ATP is used by ATPase in active transport of ions against concentration gradient
Techniques
Techniques
Why Different Substrates?Glass is standard, but non-conductive. Bottom electrode is
necessary to allow for electrical measurements.
Lipids Used: 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC)
1% Fluorescent lipids used for imaging experiments
Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)
488nm wavelength excitation, 530nm emission
Lipids provided by Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
Techniques
ProcedureCleaning
Reconstitution
Extruding
Formation
Rinsing
Techniques
Optical Characterizations:Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP)
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177
200
200.5
201
201.5
202
202.5
203
203.5
204
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177
200
200.5
201
201.5
202
202.5
203
203.5
204
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Un-smoothed, un-normalized
Exponentially smoothed, un-normalized
Smoothed, Normalized
Inte
nsi
ty
Inte
nsi
tyIn
ten
sity
Position Position
Position
Techniques
Optical Characterizations:Line Profiles (saline-washed glass)
Good Bilayer RecoveryDiffusion is GaussianSlope of normalized line profile decreases
Bad Bilayer RecoveryBleaching resembles diffusion recoverySlope of line profile remains constant
Techniques
Optical Characterizations:Line Profiles: Good vs Bad
Axelrod & Soumpasis Method:
Kapitza Method:
Expected Diffusion Coefficients for Glass: 0.1 to 10 um^2/sec
Techniques
Optical Characterizations:Diffusion Coefficient
Diffusion (Axelrod) coefficients:18.3419.4720.5321.1619.522.3918.14
Avg: 19.93
Diffusion (Kapitza) coefficients:28.8624.326.8
29.8125.7332.5128.32
Avg: 28.05
Inte
nsi
ty
Inte
nsi
ty D
iffer
ence
Time (s) Time (s)
TechniquesOptical Characterizations:Matlab Plotted Intensity Profiles (saline-washed glass)
– Uses the line profiles to measure rate of diffusion in both X and Y directions through use of Fast Fourier Transform
– Gave much smaller but inconsistent values
– Diffusion coefficient seemed too dependent on time
D0.550.200.360.241.108.70
Time (s)60120180240300360
Techniques
Optical Characterizations:Diffusion Coefficient - Matlab code provided by Professor
Lance Kam
log(Freq/Hz)
log(Freq/Hz)
Electrical Characterizations: Cyclic Voltammetry (CV)
– Potential sweep gives qualitative information about redox reactions
Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)– Bode Plot: Phase angle and Magnitude
– Data fitted circuit models of bilayer and substrate
log(
imp
edan
ce/O
hms)
Ph
ase
Ang
le
90°
0°
Techniques
Well-formed Bilayer Badly-formed Bilayer
Techniques
Electrical Characterizations:EIS: Good vs Bad
Substrates
Indium-Tin Oxide (ITO)Transparent conductor coated on glass
Shown in literature to support bilayers
Substrates
Indium-Tin Oxide (ITO)Optical Characterization
– Line profile shows improper bilayer recovery
FRAP Line Profile
Inte
nsi
ty
Position
Substrates
Indium-Tin Oxide (ITO)Electrical Characterization
– Supports FRAP evidence of unstable bilayer formation
Substrates
PEDOT-PSS Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate)
Transparent polymer
Conductor
Applied by spin coating
Substrates
PEDOT-PSSOptical Characterization
– Line profile suggests improper bilayer formation
FRAP Line Profile
Inte
nsi
ty
Position
Substrates
PEDOT-PSSElectrical Characterization
– Supports FRAP evidence of unstable bilayer formation
– Data does not conform to expectations
AFM image of bilayer over patterned substrate
SiO2
Electrode/Silicon
Substrates
Nano-Fabricated Patterned Substrate
Substrates
Nano-Fabricated Patterned SubstrateOptical Characterization
– Line profile shows clear diffusive recovery
FRAP Line Profile
Inte
nsi
ty
Position
SubstratesNano-Fabricated Patterned SubstrateElectrical Characterization
– EIS supports promising bilayer formation
Substrates
Tethered Bilayer (Hydrophobic Substrate)Constructed by adsorbing a functional group to the surface
of an otherwise non-hydrophilic substrate
Substrates
Tethered Bilayer: GoldGold slide treatments allow for the formation of a Self-
Assembled Monolayer (SAM)
Changes the surface chemistry of the substrate to allow for self-assembly of lipid bilayers– Cysteamine(2-aminoethanethiol)
– Silane((3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 1121314151 61 7181 92 02 12 22 32 425262728293 03 13 23 33 43 53 63 73839404142434445464 74849505 15 25 35 45 55657585960616 263646 56 66 76 86 97071727374757 67 778798 08 18 28 3848586878889909192939495969 79 89 91 001 0110 210 310 410 510 61 071 081 091 1 01 1 111 211 311 411 511 611 71 1 81 1 912 012 112 212 31 241 251 2612 71 281 291 301 3113213313 413 513 613 713 813 91 401 411 421 431 441 451 461 4714 814 915 015 115 21 531 541 551 561 571 581 591 6016116216316416516 616 716 816 917 017 117 217 317 41 751 761 77
0
0 .1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
0 .5
0 .6
0 .7
0 .8
0 .9
1
Substrates
Gold: Thiol SolutionOptical Characterization
– Line profile shows inconclusive recovery
– Some bilayers are stable: maybe promising
FRAP Line Profile
Inte
nsi
ty
Position
Substrates
Gold: Thiol SolutionElectrical Characterization
– Results are preliminary
Substrates
Gold: Stamping with Cysteamine, Silane or Ethanol Control
Soak PDMS stamp in SAM solution
Dry and lightly press onto gold slide
Substrates
Gold: Stamping with Cysteamine, Silane or Ethanol Control
Bilayer forms in stamped regions
Forming a Vertical Bilayer: Separate two saline solution chambers
with thin Teflon
Poke hole through Teflon
Fill chambers with lipids
Change solution level of chambers on both side such that lipids “zip” across the hole in Teflon, forming a lipid bilayer
Disadvantage: bilayers last about 6hrs at longest
Vertical Bilayer
Vertical Bilayers: Electrical Characterization
Blue: TeflonBrown: Teflon with holesRed: Bilayer over hole
Vertical Bilayer
Further characterization of substrates with actual membrane protein
Consistent diffusion coefficient analysisElectrical settings optimizationPerfection of tethering/lipid bilayer formation
proceduresAFM images of bilayers with proteins and of the
bilayer on all the substrates
Eventual biobattery/ biosensor using lipid bilayer research and transmembrane proteins
Future Steps
Bye, lab!
Thank You!
To our mentors:
Siddharth Ramakrishnan, PhD
Jared Roseman
And to:
Professor Ken Shepard
Professor Lance Kam
Ria Miranda
And to Viewers like you!
Acknowledgments
ReferencesAlvarez, PE, C. A. Gervasi, A. E. Vallejo., 2007, Impedance Analysis of Ion Transport Through Supported Lipid Membranes Doped with Ionophores: A New Kinetic Approach., Journal Biol Phys 33:421–431
Erbe, A., 2007, Calculation of the diffusion coefficient from FRAP (FPR) data.
Feng, J., Ci, Y. X., Zhang, C. Y., Ottova, A. L., Tien, H. T., 1999, Photoelectric measurements of self-assembled and supported planar lipid bilayers: a new technique for studying apoptosis, Electrochemistry Communications, p. 145 - 147.
Janshoff, Andreas . Claudia Steinem., 2006, Transport across artificial membranes–an analytical perspective., Anal Bioanal Chem (2006) 385: 433–451.
Kaufmann, S., Kumar, K., and Reimhult, E., 2011, Preparation and Dynamic Patterning of Supported Lipid Membranes Mimicking Cell Membranes, Methods in Molecular Biology, v. 751, ch. 28.
Vladimir Atanasov., 2005, Membrane on a Chip: A Functional Tethered Lipid Bilayer Membrane on Silicon Oxide Surfaces., Biophysical Journal,Vol.89,September 2005, p.1780–1788.
Ro¨mer, Wilfred, Claudia Steinem.,2004, Impedance Analysis and Single-Channel Recordings on Nano-Black Lipid Membranes Based on Porous Alumina., Biophysical Journal Volume 86 February 2004 955–965.
Srinivasan, M.P, T. V. Ratto, P. Stroeve, and M. L. Longo., 2001, Patterned Supported Bilayers on Self-Assembled Monolayers: Confinement ofAdjacent Mobile Bilayers., Langmuir, 17, 7951-7954.
Steinem, Claudia, Andreas Janshoff, Wolf-Peter Ulrich, Manfred Sieber, Hans-Joachim Galla., 1996, Impedance analysis of supported lipid bilayer membranes: a scrutiny of different preparation techniques., Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1279 (1996) 169-180.
Tien, H.T.,1984, Cyclic Voltammetry of Bilayer Lipid Membranes., J. Phys. Chem. 1984,88, 3172-3174.
Tien H,T., L. Ottovaa,1998, Supported planar lipid bilayers (s-BLMs) as electrochemical biosensors., Electrochimica Acta, Vol. 43, No. 23, pp. 3587±3610.
Urisu, T., Rahman, M., Uno, H., Tero, R., and Nonogaki, Y., 2005, Formation of high-resistance supported lipid bilayer on the surface of a silicon substrate with microelectrodes, Nanomedicine, p. 317 - 322.
Vladimir Atanasov., 2005, Membrane on a Chip: A Functional Tethered Lipid Bilayer Membrane on Silicon Oxide Surfaces., Biophysical Journal,Vol.89,September 2005, p.1780–1788.
http://www.embl.de/eamnet/frap/html/overview.html
Images
http://www.quora.com/What-keeps-a-phospholipid-bilayer-of-one-cell-from-fusing-with-the-bilayer-of-another-cellhttp://www.avantilipids.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1786&Itemid=460&catnumber=770375http://bio1151b.nicerweb.com/Locked/media/ch07/bilayer.htmlhttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/Phospholipids_aqueous_solution_structures.svg/300px-Phospholipids_aqueous_solution_structures.svg.pnghttp://popups.ulg.ac.be/Base/docannexe/image/6568/img-11.jpghttp://esciencenews.com/files/images/20080723320550.jpghttp://rxrecall.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/proton_pump.jpghttp://www.avantilipids.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=532&Itemid=296http://www.cf.gu.se/digitalAssets/725/725440_FRAP_recovery.gifhttp://www.sigmaaldrich.com/prodimages/i/ito_slides.jpghttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijp/2009/650509.fig.001.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=pdms+stamping&um=1&hl=en&tbm=isch&tbnid=xhn_ypZmuBcWoM:&imgrefurl=http://gmwgroup.harvard.edu/research/soft_lithography_and_nanofabrication/&docid=ZeUDkFWDhXS3gM&w=500&h=384&ei=0eMyToOLJs3pgQeGpdGUDQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=178&vpy=424&dur=127&hovh=196&hovw=255&tx=122&ty=94&page=1&tbnh=136&tbnw=178&start=0&ndsp=28&ved=1t:429,r:14,s:0&biw=1639&bih=800
Questions?