optical monitoring

Upload: ghallab-alsadeh

Post on 03-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    1/47

    CIAN Supercourse 2011

    Optical Performance Monitoring toEnable Robust and Reconfigurable

    Optical Networks

    Alan Willner

    University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, CA 90089-2565

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    2/47

    USCs OCLab

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    3/47

    Outline

    1. Overarching Perspective

    2. Optical Performance Monitoring- optically-assisted techniques

    - receiver based techniques

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    4/47

    Differential Phase-Shift-Keying (DPSK)

    DPSK

    t

    1 1 0 1 00

    RZ-DPSK

    t

    1 1 0 1 00

    Pulse appears in every bit

    Constant optical power

    Energy is information.

    Information is sent during 0 bits.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    5/47

    Multi-level Modulation Formats in Optics

    Benefits from coherent detection:

    More effective for pol-demuxing Digital processing for mitigation

    1 bit/symbol 2 bits/symbol 4 bits/symbol~112 Gbaud

    OOK

    DPSKDB/PSBT

    ~56 Gbaud

    DQPSK

    (4-ASK)

    ~28 Gbaud

    PDM-(D)QPSK

    (16-DPSK)

    "#$%&'

    ()$%&'

    ( )

    "#$%&'

    ()$%&'

    "#$%&'

    ()$%&'

    "#$%*'

    ()$%*'

    8 bits/symbol~14 Gbaud

    16-QAM

    8-PSK/2-ASK

    "#$%&'

    ()$%&'

    "#$%*'

    ()$%*'

    !"#"$"%&"' )* +,%-"$. /0&12"0345&"%2. 678 9

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    6/47

    DPSK & DQPSK

    T

    -

    DPSK

    Re{E}

    Im{E}

    ! 3-dB sensitivity improvement! Less sensitive to nonlinearity

    ! ! 0 0

    Input signal

    1 1

    1 1

    0 1 0

    T

    -

    DQPSK

    Re{E}

    Im{E}

    ! Spectrally efficient - 2 bit/s/Hz! Tolerant to dispersion

    Input

    signal

    T

    -

    +45

    -45

    I

    I

    Q

    Q

    I

    Q

    T

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    7/47

    Polmux Concept

    0001

    11 10

    000001

    011 010

    100

    101

    111 110

    Regular (D)QPSK

    2 bits per symbol

    Polmux (D)QPSK

    3 bits per symbol

    polarization

    axis

    polarization

    axis

    Polarization is another dimension to carry information, so Polmux is more spectrally efficient.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    8/47

    DPSK & Polarization-Multiplexing

    T

    -

    D(Q)PSK

    Re{E}

    Im{E}

    ! Less sensitive to nonlinearity! 3-dB sensitivity improvement

    ! ! 0 0

    Input signal

    1 1

    1 1

    0 1 0

    T

    Pol-muxing doubles the spectral efficiency!

    enhanced performance

    Pol-muxed

    DPSK channelPC

    PC PBC

    DPSK

    DPSK

    H

    V

    t

    t

    H

    V

    t

    PBS

    DPSK

    DPSK

    PC

    H

    t

    V

    t

    Transmitter Receiver

    Data 1

    Data 2

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    9/47

    Latest Results on High Capacity/S.E. Transmission

    32Tb/s PDM-RZ-8QAM over 580km Ultra-low-loss Fiber

    PDM-RZ-8QAM Digital coherent detection EDFA-only Amplification 25GHz-spaced 320x114Gb/s length / loss ratio82.8km / 14.6dB

    X. Zhou, OFC 2009 PDP

    72x100Gb/s over 7040km Large Effective Area Fiber

    G. Charlet, OFC 2009 PDP

    100Gb/s channels

    88x80km distance Raman-Erbiumamplification

    coherent receiver

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    10/47

    10 bit/s/Hz Spectral Efficiency

    Spectral Efficiency

    " Challenge: to explore multilevel optical modulation formats" Pack more bits per symbol: DQPSK, APSK, OFDM, QAM" Powerful tool: orthogonal modulation

    Improving Spectral Efficiency

    Pol-Mux 1 Gsymbol/s, 128 QAM

    (14Gbit/s) (BW: 1.4 GHz)

    Several Examples

    ModulationSpectral

    EfficiencyReference

    10!112 Gbit/sPolMux16-QAM

    6.2 bit/s/HzA. H. Gnauck

    PDPB82009

    8!

    65.1 Gbit/scoherentPolMux-OFDM

    7 bit/s/Hz H. TakahashiPDPB7OFC2009

    PolMux1Gsymbol/s128 QAM14 Gbit/s

    10 bit/s/HzH. GotoJThA45

    OFC2008

    To date, largest spectral efficiency

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    11/47

    Predictedbursting of bubble in 97

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    12/47

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    13/47

    Heterogeneous Systems: One Network Fits All

    Future

    Heterogeneous

    Network

    Economics: Early market entry of new services (CATV??)

    Variable QoSDifferent

    Modulation Formats

    Multiple

    Wavelength Ranges

    Circuit +PacketSwitching?

    Variable

    Bit Rate

    Sub-carrier

    Multiplexing

    (D+A)?

    Hardware should be reconfigurable and transparent An intelligent network could use the optimalmethod fromthe application/user viewpoint.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    14/47

    Think wireless laptop LAN

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    15/47

    Self-Managed Networks

    Adaptive Resources Diagnose and repair BW allocation Gain/Loss

    Dispersion Compensation -Routing

    Look-up tables

    A

    C

    D

    B

    E

    Today :Measure, Make,

    Tweak, Pray.

    Automation + Intelligence + Monitoring

    Keep the person out of the loop

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    16/47

    Monitoring the State of the Network

    UbiquitousMonitoring

    Monitor non-catastrophic datadegradation

    Isolate specific impairments

    Detect

    Attacks

    Locate

    Faults

    Diagnose &

    Assess Repair

    DamageReroute &

    Balance Traffic

    Window of operability is shrinking Monitoring is required

    Ubiquitous deploymentGraceful routing based onphysical state of network?

    Telcos: Human Error(~1/3 of outages)

    MaliciousBehavior

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    17/47

    OPM

    CD PMD OSNR Power Crosstalk

    Hardware# Optical/RF filter# Low-speed detectorSoftware# Pattern recognition

    using neuron networks

    and data constellations

    Spec# Update rate# Isolation# Advanced modulation

    format

    # One or more faults

    NC & MActions Impacted by OPM

    What impairment is affecting the traffic/data? Should compensation be tuned? Should format/rate be changed? Should QoS be changed? Should routing table be changed?

    Network &

    Switching Fabric

    Determine each parameter:

    For example:

    Level 0 = no problem Level 10 = channel outage

    Design of Optical Performance Monitor

    PARAGON

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    18/47

    Monitoring for an Efficient Network

    Robert Shapiro, former Undersecretary of Commerce:

    Accommodating the fast-rising demands on bandwidth willrequire a significant acceleration in industry investments totaling $300 billion to $1 trillion for the US.

    $Operate closer to the red line.$Less need to over-build.$Increase mean-time-to-failure.$Decrease mean-time-to-repair.$Decrease human error.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    19/47

    Multivariable Routing

    < j, #j>

    a. Fiber length

    b. Signal degradationc. Amplificationand transients

    " Component non-idealities# Signal degradation

    # Each link and node has a set of parameters (a, b, c)# Must interpret the cost function for routing table# Determine ranges of these parameters for

    inclusion into network model

    Interoperability with fiber plant # of nodes

    Size of network

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    20/47

    Outline

    1. Overarching Perspective

    2. Optical Performance Monitoring- optically-assisted techniques

    - receiver based techniques

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    21/47

    Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    22/47

    Arbitrarily

    Polarized signal+

    Unpolarized noise

    Polarization

    controller

    Ps + Pase

    Polarizer

    (Parallel)

    Polarizer

    (Orthogonal)

    Ps + 0.5*Pase

    0.5*Pase

    Y. C. Chung et. al., JLT, 2006

    ! The received signal (together with noise) is split into two orthogonalpolarization components.

    ! The polarization ratio is a measure of the OSNR (Ps/Pase).! The performance could be affected by various polarization effects.

    OSNR Monitoring Using Polarization Nulling

    Transparent to multiple input data format and bit rate

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    23/47

    ! Using partial bit delay-line Interferometer (DLI)! OSNR is proportional to the Ratio (=Pconst/ Pdest)!Applicable to OOK, DPSK data

    Y. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08

    OSNR Monitoring for Multiple Modulation Formats

    T

    PowerMeter

    Power

    Meter

    Pconst

    Pdest

    Input

    signaldelay

    )2

    1

    4

    1(

    )2

    1

    4

    3(

    PP

    PP

    noisesignal

    noisesignal

    Ratio

    +

    +

    =

    Signal has coherent interference, noise doesnt

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    24/47

    ! Using partial bit delay-line Interferometer (DLI)! OSNR is proportional to the Ratio (=Pconst/ Pdest)!Applicable to OOK, DPSK data

    Y. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08

    OSNR Monitoring for Multiple Modulation Formats

    FSR=1/T

    Constructive portDestructive port Monitor tones to isolate-- CD and PMD

    Insensitive to CD and PMD DB / AMI have tones OSNR -- only S coherent, not N

    T

    PowerMeter

    Power

    Meter

    Pconst

    Pdest

    Input

    signaldelay

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    25/47

    Channel Monitoring using Integrated Filters

    )2

    1

    4

    1(

    )2

    1

    4

    3(

    PP

    PP

    noisesignal

    noisesignal

    Ratio

    +

    +

    =

    OSNR:Signal has coherent interference, not noise

    CD & PMD

    Tones affected differently by CD & PMDY. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    26/47

    Dependence on Chromatic Dispersion

    Temperature Dependence

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

    DispersionChang

    e,

    D(ps/nm)

    NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    L=1000 km

    L=500 km

    L=200 km

    Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km

    d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

    DispersionChang

    e,

    D(ps/nm)

    NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    L=1000 km

    L=500 km

    L=200 km

    Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km

    d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    Temp Change, C

    Temperature Dependence

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

    DispersionChang

    e,

    D(ps/nm)

    NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    L=1000 km

    L=500 km

    L=200 km

    Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km

    d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

    DispersionChang

    e,

    D(ps/nm)

    NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    L=1000 km

    L=500 km

    L=200 km

    Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km

    d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit

    Temp Change, C

    Data Rate Dependence

    Dispersionps

    nmkmBit-Rate

    Doubled

    Time Half Freq. Double

    -1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T-1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T

    Penalty increases

    FOURtimes

    Time Freq

    Data Rate Dependence

    Dispersionps

    nmkmBit-Rate

    Doubled

    Time Half Freq. Double

    -1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T-1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T

    Penalty increases

    FOURtimes

    Time Freq

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    27/47

    Vestigial Sideband Optical Filtering

    Frequency

    BW

    $f

    VSB-UVSB-L

    Optical Carrier

    fU f0 fL

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    28/47

    Time delay ( t ) between two VSB signals is a function of

    chromatic dispersion

    Bits can be recovered from either part of the spectrum

    40-Gb/s

    RZ Data

    VSB-L

    VSB-U

    f

    Dispersion

    f

    O/E t

    Chromatic DispersionMonitoring Using Clock Phase

    Isolate CD from PMD effects Low cost

    Q. Yu, JLT, Dec., 2002

    Filteredspectrum

    Entirechannel

    Filteredspectrum

    0 50 100 1500.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    Intensity

    Time (ps)

    0 50 100 1500.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    Intensity

    Time (ps)

    Q. Yu, JLT, 2003

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    29/47

    Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD)cross section

    Elliptical Fiber Core

    side view

    PMD induces randomlychanging degradations.

    Critical limitation at>10 Gbit/s data rates.

    The 2 polarization modes propagate at different speeds.

    1st-order PMD = DGD

    Probability of Exceeding a Specific DGD (%)

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    0.111050

    Maxwelliandistribution

    tailProb

    ability

    Distribution

    0 10 20 30 40 500 10 20 30 40 50

    0.111050

    Differential Group Delay (ps)

    Maxwelliandistribution

    tail

    Significant higher-order effects can exist.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    30/47

    In Phase

    t

    tAxis 2

    Axis 1

    Out of Phase

    $%

    Axis 2

    Axis 1

    CarrierUpperclock

    Lowerclock

    PMD

    (AxisDelay)

    Power

    f

    CD

    (Freq.

    Delay)

    In Phase

    t

    tLower

    Upper

    Out of Phase

    $%

    Lower

    Upper

    Two Clocks

    Upper Clock

    RF Clock Tone Fading

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    31/47

    PMD Monitoring by Narrowband Filtering

    Opticalspectrum

    detection

    ElectricalDomain

    Clock fadeswith

    PMD & CD

    detection

    Clock fadeswith

    PMD only

    w/o filter

    w/ partial filtering

    SMF

    Upper & Lower Clocks

    Only Upper Clock

    T. Luo, et al., PTL, 2004

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    w/ filter

    DGD (ps)

    RelativeClock

    Power(dB)

    DGD (ps)

    RelativeClockPower(dB)

    320 ps/nm

    0 ps/nm

    640 ps/nm

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    w/o filter

    CD = 0 ps/nm

    320 ps/nm

    640 ps/nm

    ~20d

    B

    < 3 dB

    f

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    32/47

    T

    Power

    Meter

    Power

    Meter

    Const.

    Dest.Input

    signal

    OSNR monitor Processing

    Partial bit

    Power ratio of twoports indicates OSNR.

    This OSNR monitor istransparent to various

    data formats.

    OPMs Using Delay-Line Interferometer

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    33/47

    Channel Monitoring using Integrated Filters

    )2

    1

    4

    1(

    )2

    1

    4

    3(

    PP

    PP

    noisesignal

    noisesignal

    Ratio

    +

    +

    =

    OSNR:Signal has coherent interference, not noise

    CD & PMD

    Tones affected differently by CD & PMDY. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    34/47

    11/7/11 34

    PMD Monitoring of Phase-Modulated

    Data Using Interfermetric Filter

    ! The two outputs of the PBS represent the constructive and destructive filtersof a standard Mach-Zehnder delay-line interfometer (FSR = 1/!").

    ! At the destructive port, the monitored RF power will change with the DGD-generated interferometric filter response.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    35/47

    11/7/11 35

    Experimental Results

    The RF power measured at 170 MHz increases by ~ 20 dB in thepresence of 0 to 100 ps of DGD.

    Chromatic dispersion-insensitive measurements to be within + 1 dB.

    DGD (ps)

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    RFPow

    er(dBm)

    -40

    -45

    -50

    -55

    -60

    -65

    -70

    RFPow

    er(dBm)

    -40

    -45

    -50

    -55

    -60

    -65

    -70

    Chromatic Dispersion (ps/nm)

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    10-Gb/s NRZ-DPSK

    20-Gb/s NRZ-DQPSK

    J.-Y. Yang et. al., PTL, 2008

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    36/47

    Significance of Higher-order PMD

    Ref: M. Karlsson, et al., Optics Letters, 1999;

    H. Kogelnik, et al., JLT 2003.

    "It is sometimes stated that once the signal bandwidth is large enough for second-order PMD

    to be important, then all other higher order terms become important too. If this were strictly

    true, then higher order PMD compensation would be a hopeless task there is a need for

    closer examination of these bandwidth limitations.

    $&

    ACF

    (ps2) $&PSP

    -H. Kogelnik, et al., JLT 2003

    PSP Bandwidth

    Autocorrelation Function of PMD Vector Higher-orders become

    important if signal BW

    > $&PSP

    Theory

    Measurement

    Fiber typeOld fiber

    PMD = 0.5 ps/km1/2

    New fiberPMD = 0.1 ps/km1/2

    Future fiberPMD = 0.05 ps/km1/2

    1 Tb/s Transmission

    Limit due to PMD40 m

    1 km

    4 km

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    37/47

    Combined Effects of PMD and PDL

    Polarization Mode Dispersion

    Polarization Dependent Loss (PDL)

    Optical

    Components

    (PDL=? dB)

    $%Different

    Attenuation

    PSP1 (PSP2

    Differential

    Group Delay

    PSP1(PSP2

    Fiber with high PMD

    PSP1

    PSP2

    PSP 1

    PSP2

    PSP1

    PSP2

    PSP1(PSP2

    PDL:

    Frequency-dependent

    attenuation

    PMD:

    Enhanced time spreading

    B. Huttner, et al., JSTQE, 2000

    L.-S. Yan, etal., PTL, 2003

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    38/47

    Combined Effects of PMD and PDL

    Probability density function of 15 PMD sections

    Without PDLWith 15 PDL sections

    (each: 0.2 dB)

    L.-S. Yan et. al., JLT 2004

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    39/47

    Outline

    1. Overarching Perspective

    2. Optical Performance Monitoring- optically-assisted techniques

    - receiver based techniques

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    40/47

    Coherent Detection

    !"#$%& ( ")*!+ , + %,-./ +

    01 + %23+0( "#$%& ")*-./$ 01#2 1)*3% ( 0)#$%& 4 ))*3 &

    All linear distortions (Dispersion, PMD, PDL) can

    theoretically be fully compensated. Nonlineardistortion can be partially compensated

    Coherently

    ReceivedElectrical Signal

    ~

    Electric Field

    Vector ofOptical Signal

    LinearSystem

    Signal Amplitude Signal Phase

    90oHybrid

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    41/47

    # Limited to receivers.

    MotivationAsynchronous Sampling (by MDI)

    (Asynchronous sampling)

    Clean Noise CD

    PMD Crosstalk All

    Input

    DataDelay

    Sampling

    On-Off-Keying Data

    Unique impairment pattern!multiple impairments monitoring

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    42/47

    Router

    ONE

    ONE

    Router

    Router

    Optical Network

    End Customer

    Re-route or feed backinformation tocontrol the ONE

    Trained receiversto

    automatically identifyimpairments

    ONE

    Send error

    signals

    Fiber link withvarious impairments

    Router

    Self-Managed Optical Networks

    ! Monitored information can be sent to the network controller andoptical network elements to rapidly reroute the data information

    X. Wu et al, J. Lightwave Technol. 27 (16), 2009.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    43/47

    Concept - ANNs Trained w/ Eye Diagram Parameters

    ! It is obvious that different impairment combinations producedistinct features in the eye diagrams! The input parameters for training are derived from eye diagrams

    % Q-factor, eye-closure, jitter, and crossing amplitude! The controlled impairments are used as outputs for training

    Tx

    Rx

    OSNR = 36 dBCD = 0DGD = 0

    OSNR = 28 dBCD = 0DGD = 0

    OSNR = 20 dBCD = 0DGD = 0

    OSNR = 28 dB

    CD = 60 ps/nmDGD = 0

    OSNR = 28 dB

    CD = 0DGD = 10 ps

    OSNR = 28 dB

    CD = 60 ps/nmDGD = 10 psF

    iberLink

    X. Wu et al, J. Lightwave Technol. 27 (16), 2009.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    44/47

    Artificial Neural Networks

    Advantages of ANN Approach

    ! Efficient identification and isolation of multiple impairments! Enhanced monitoring range and sensitivity! Simple and fast processing of the monitored information! Format transparent

    X. Wu et al, J. Lightwave Technol. 27 (16), 2009.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    45/47

    Crossing Amp.

    OSNRCD

    DGD

    3-Layer ANN Model12 Hidden Neurons

    64 Testing Samples

    Q-factor

    Closure

    Jitter

    OSNR

    CD

    DGD

    3-Layer ANN Model

    12 Hidden Neurons

    Conjugant Gradient

    Training

    125 Samples

    Q-factor

    Closure

    Jitter

    Crossing Amp.

    40-Gb/s RZ-OOK testing results

    40-Gb/s RZ-DPSK testing results

    Training Errors for OOK and DPSK Systems

    Block Diagrams for ANN Training and Testing

    X. Wu, ECOC 2008

    OSNR/CD/PMD Identifications using ANNs

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    46/47

    OSNR=36,

    CD=0, DGD=0

    OSNR = 16, CD=0,

    DGD = 0

    OSNR = 36, CD=60,

    DGD = 0

    OSNR = 36, CD=0,

    DGD = 10

    OSNR = 20, CD=45,

    DGD = 7.5

    OSNR = 16, CD=60,

    DGD = 10

    Concept - ANNs Trained w/ Delay-Tap Plot Parameters

    ! It is obvious that different impairment combinations producedistinct features in the delay-tap plots

    X. Wu et al, ECOC 2009, paper P3.04.

  • 8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring

    47/47