optical monitoring
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
1/47
CIAN Supercourse 2011
Optical Performance Monitoring toEnable Robust and Reconfigurable
Optical Networks
Alan Willner
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA 90089-2565
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
2/47
USCs OCLab
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
3/47
Outline
1. Overarching Perspective
2. Optical Performance Monitoring- optically-assisted techniques
- receiver based techniques
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
4/47
Differential Phase-Shift-Keying (DPSK)
DPSK
t
1 1 0 1 00
RZ-DPSK
t
1 1 0 1 00
Pulse appears in every bit
Constant optical power
Energy is information.
Information is sent during 0 bits.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
5/47
Multi-level Modulation Formats in Optics
Benefits from coherent detection:
More effective for pol-demuxing Digital processing for mitigation
1 bit/symbol 2 bits/symbol 4 bits/symbol~112 Gbaud
OOK
DPSKDB/PSBT
~56 Gbaud
DQPSK
(4-ASK)
~28 Gbaud
PDM-(D)QPSK
(16-DPSK)
"#$%&'
()$%&'
( )
"#$%&'
()$%&'
"#$%&'
()$%&'
"#$%*'
()$%*'
8 bits/symbol~14 Gbaud
16-QAM
8-PSK/2-ASK
"#$%&'
()$%&'
"#$%*'
()$%*'
!"#"$"%&"' )* +,%-"$. /0&12"0345&"%2. 678 9
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
6/47
DPSK & DQPSK
T
-
DPSK
Re{E}
Im{E}
! 3-dB sensitivity improvement! Less sensitive to nonlinearity
! ! 0 0
Input signal
1 1
1 1
0 1 0
T
-
DQPSK
Re{E}
Im{E}
! Spectrally efficient - 2 bit/s/Hz! Tolerant to dispersion
Input
signal
T
-
+45
-45
I
I
Q
Q
I
Q
T
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
7/47
Polmux Concept
0001
11 10
000001
011 010
100
101
111 110
Regular (D)QPSK
2 bits per symbol
Polmux (D)QPSK
3 bits per symbol
polarization
axis
polarization
axis
Polarization is another dimension to carry information, so Polmux is more spectrally efficient.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
8/47
DPSK & Polarization-Multiplexing
T
-
D(Q)PSK
Re{E}
Im{E}
! Less sensitive to nonlinearity! 3-dB sensitivity improvement
! ! 0 0
Input signal
1 1
1 1
0 1 0
T
Pol-muxing doubles the spectral efficiency!
enhanced performance
Pol-muxed
DPSK channelPC
PC PBC
DPSK
DPSK
H
V
t
t
H
V
t
PBS
DPSK
DPSK
PC
H
t
V
t
Transmitter Receiver
Data 1
Data 2
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
9/47
Latest Results on High Capacity/S.E. Transmission
32Tb/s PDM-RZ-8QAM over 580km Ultra-low-loss Fiber
PDM-RZ-8QAM Digital coherent detection EDFA-only Amplification 25GHz-spaced 320x114Gb/s length / loss ratio82.8km / 14.6dB
X. Zhou, OFC 2009 PDP
72x100Gb/s over 7040km Large Effective Area Fiber
G. Charlet, OFC 2009 PDP
100Gb/s channels
88x80km distance Raman-Erbiumamplification
coherent receiver
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
10/47
10 bit/s/Hz Spectral Efficiency
Spectral Efficiency
" Challenge: to explore multilevel optical modulation formats" Pack more bits per symbol: DQPSK, APSK, OFDM, QAM" Powerful tool: orthogonal modulation
Improving Spectral Efficiency
Pol-Mux 1 Gsymbol/s, 128 QAM
(14Gbit/s) (BW: 1.4 GHz)
Several Examples
ModulationSpectral
EfficiencyReference
10!112 Gbit/sPolMux16-QAM
6.2 bit/s/HzA. H. Gnauck
PDPB82009
8!
65.1 Gbit/scoherentPolMux-OFDM
7 bit/s/Hz H. TakahashiPDPB7OFC2009
PolMux1Gsymbol/s128 QAM14 Gbit/s
10 bit/s/HzH. GotoJThA45
OFC2008
To date, largest spectral efficiency
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
11/47
Predictedbursting of bubble in 97
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
12/47
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
13/47
Heterogeneous Systems: One Network Fits All
Future
Heterogeneous
Network
Economics: Early market entry of new services (CATV??)
Variable QoSDifferent
Modulation Formats
Multiple
Wavelength Ranges
Circuit +PacketSwitching?
Variable
Bit Rate
Sub-carrier
Multiplexing
(D+A)?
Hardware should be reconfigurable and transparent An intelligent network could use the optimalmethod fromthe application/user viewpoint.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
14/47
Think wireless laptop LAN
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
15/47
Self-Managed Networks
Adaptive Resources Diagnose and repair BW allocation Gain/Loss
Dispersion Compensation -Routing
Look-up tables
A
C
D
B
E
Today :Measure, Make,
Tweak, Pray.
Automation + Intelligence + Monitoring
Keep the person out of the loop
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
16/47
Monitoring the State of the Network
UbiquitousMonitoring
Monitor non-catastrophic datadegradation
Isolate specific impairments
Detect
Attacks
Locate
Faults
Diagnose &
Assess Repair
DamageReroute &
Balance Traffic
Window of operability is shrinking Monitoring is required
Ubiquitous deploymentGraceful routing based onphysical state of network?
Telcos: Human Error(~1/3 of outages)
MaliciousBehavior
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
17/47
OPM
CD PMD OSNR Power Crosstalk
Hardware# Optical/RF filter# Low-speed detectorSoftware# Pattern recognition
using neuron networks
and data constellations
Spec# Update rate# Isolation# Advanced modulation
format
# One or more faults
NC & MActions Impacted by OPM
What impairment is affecting the traffic/data? Should compensation be tuned? Should format/rate be changed? Should QoS be changed? Should routing table be changed?
Network &
Switching Fabric
Determine each parameter:
For example:
Level 0 = no problem Level 10 = channel outage
Design of Optical Performance Monitor
PARAGON
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
18/47
Monitoring for an Efficient Network
Robert Shapiro, former Undersecretary of Commerce:
Accommodating the fast-rising demands on bandwidth willrequire a significant acceleration in industry investments totaling $300 billion to $1 trillion for the US.
$Operate closer to the red line.$Less need to over-build.$Increase mean-time-to-failure.$Decrease mean-time-to-repair.$Decrease human error.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
19/47
Multivariable Routing
< j, #j>
a. Fiber length
b. Signal degradationc. Amplificationand transients
" Component non-idealities# Signal degradation
# Each link and node has a set of parameters (a, b, c)# Must interpret the cost function for routing table# Determine ranges of these parameters for
inclusion into network model
Interoperability with fiber plant # of nodes
Size of network
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
20/47
Outline
1. Overarching Perspective
2. Optical Performance Monitoring- optically-assisted techniques
- receiver based techniques
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
21/47
Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
22/47
Arbitrarily
Polarized signal+
Unpolarized noise
Polarization
controller
Ps + Pase
Polarizer
(Parallel)
Polarizer
(Orthogonal)
Ps + 0.5*Pase
0.5*Pase
Y. C. Chung et. al., JLT, 2006
! The received signal (together with noise) is split into two orthogonalpolarization components.
! The polarization ratio is a measure of the OSNR (Ps/Pase).! The performance could be affected by various polarization effects.
OSNR Monitoring Using Polarization Nulling
Transparent to multiple input data format and bit rate
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
23/47
! Using partial bit delay-line Interferometer (DLI)! OSNR is proportional to the Ratio (=Pconst/ Pdest)!Applicable to OOK, DPSK data
Y. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08
OSNR Monitoring for Multiple Modulation Formats
T
PowerMeter
Power
Meter
Pconst
Pdest
Input
signaldelay
)2
1
4
1(
)2
1
4
3(
PP
PP
noisesignal
noisesignal
Ratio
+
+
=
Signal has coherent interference, noise doesnt
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
24/47
! Using partial bit delay-line Interferometer (DLI)! OSNR is proportional to the Ratio (=Pconst/ Pdest)!Applicable to OOK, DPSK data
Y. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08
OSNR Monitoring for Multiple Modulation Formats
FSR=1/T
Constructive portDestructive port Monitor tones to isolate-- CD and PMD
Insensitive to CD and PMD DB / AMI have tones OSNR -- only S coherent, not N
T
PowerMeter
Power
Meter
Pconst
Pdest
Input
signaldelay
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
25/47
Channel Monitoring using Integrated Filters
)2
1
4
1(
)2
1
4
3(
PP
PP
noisesignal
noisesignal
Ratio
+
+
=
OSNR:Signal has coherent interference, not noise
CD & PMD
Tones affected differently by CD & PMDY. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
26/47
Dependence on Chromatic Dispersion
Temperature Dependence
-100
-50
0
50
100
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
DispersionChang
e,
D(ps/nm)
NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
L=1000 km
L=500 km
L=200 km
Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km
d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
-100
-50
0
50
100
-100
-50
0
50
100
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
DispersionChang
e,
D(ps/nm)
NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
L=1000 km
L=500 km
L=200 km
Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km
d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
Temp Change, C
Temperature Dependence
-100
-50
0
50
100
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
DispersionChang
e,
D(ps/nm)
NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
L=1000 km
L=500 km
L=200 km
Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km
d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
-100
-50
0
50
100
-100
-50
0
50
100
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
DispersionChang
e,
D(ps/nm)
NRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
L=1000 km
L=500 km
L=200 km
Dispersion Slope ~ 0.08 ps/nm2km
d0/dT ~ 0.03 nm/CNRZ 40 Gbit/s Limit
Temp Change, C
Data Rate Dependence
Dispersionps
nmkmBit-Rate
Doubled
Time Half Freq. Double
-1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T-1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T
Penalty increases
FOURtimes
Time Freq
Data Rate Dependence
Dispersionps
nmkmBit-Rate
Doubled
Time Half Freq. Double
-1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T-1/T 1/T0-1/2T 1/2T
Penalty increases
FOURtimes
Time Freq
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
27/47
Vestigial Sideband Optical Filtering
Frequency
BW
$f
VSB-UVSB-L
Optical Carrier
fU f0 fL
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
28/47
Time delay ( t ) between two VSB signals is a function of
chromatic dispersion
Bits can be recovered from either part of the spectrum
40-Gb/s
RZ Data
VSB-L
VSB-U
f
Dispersion
f
O/E t
Chromatic DispersionMonitoring Using Clock Phase
Isolate CD from PMD effects Low cost
Q. Yu, JLT, Dec., 2002
Filteredspectrum
Entirechannel
Filteredspectrum
0 50 100 1500.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Intensity
Time (ps)
0 50 100 1500.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Intensity
Time (ps)
Q. Yu, JLT, 2003
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
29/47
Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD)cross section
Elliptical Fiber Core
side view
PMD induces randomlychanging degradations.
Critical limitation at>10 Gbit/s data rates.
The 2 polarization modes propagate at different speeds.
1st-order PMD = DGD
Probability of Exceeding a Specific DGD (%)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.111050
Maxwelliandistribution
tailProb
ability
Distribution
0 10 20 30 40 500 10 20 30 40 50
0.111050
Differential Group Delay (ps)
Maxwelliandistribution
tail
Significant higher-order effects can exist.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
30/47
In Phase
t
tAxis 2
Axis 1
Out of Phase
$%
Axis 2
Axis 1
CarrierUpperclock
Lowerclock
PMD
(AxisDelay)
Power
f
CD
(Freq.
Delay)
In Phase
t
tLower
Upper
Out of Phase
$%
Lower
Upper
Two Clocks
Upper Clock
RF Clock Tone Fading
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
31/47
PMD Monitoring by Narrowband Filtering
Opticalspectrum
detection
ElectricalDomain
Clock fadeswith
PMD & CD
detection
Clock fadeswith
PMD only
w/o filter
w/ partial filtering
SMF
Upper & Lower Clocks
Only Upper Clock
T. Luo, et al., PTL, 2004
-30
-20
-10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
w/ filter
DGD (ps)
RelativeClock
Power(dB)
DGD (ps)
RelativeClockPower(dB)
320 ps/nm
0 ps/nm
640 ps/nm
-30
-20
-10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
w/o filter
CD = 0 ps/nm
320 ps/nm
640 ps/nm
~20d
B
< 3 dB
f
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
32/47
T
Power
Meter
Power
Meter
Const.
Dest.Input
signal
OSNR monitor Processing
Partial bit
Power ratio of twoports indicates OSNR.
This OSNR monitor istransparent to various
data formats.
OPMs Using Delay-Line Interferometer
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
33/47
Channel Monitoring using Integrated Filters
)2
1
4
1(
)2
1
4
3(
PP
PP
noisesignal
noisesignal
Ratio
+
+
=
OSNR:Signal has coherent interference, not noise
CD & PMD
Tones affected differently by CD & PMDY. Lize, et. al., PTL 07 and JLT 08
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
34/47
11/7/11 34
PMD Monitoring of Phase-Modulated
Data Using Interfermetric Filter
! The two outputs of the PBS represent the constructive and destructive filtersof a standard Mach-Zehnder delay-line interfometer (FSR = 1/!").
! At the destructive port, the monitored RF power will change with the DGD-generated interferometric filter response.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
35/47
11/7/11 35
Experimental Results
The RF power measured at 170 MHz increases by ~ 20 dB in thepresence of 0 to 100 ps of DGD.
Chromatic dispersion-insensitive measurements to be within + 1 dB.
DGD (ps)
0 20 40 60 80 100
RFPow
er(dBm)
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
-70
RFPow
er(dBm)
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
-70
Chromatic Dispersion (ps/nm)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
10-Gb/s NRZ-DPSK
20-Gb/s NRZ-DQPSK
J.-Y. Yang et. al., PTL, 2008
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
36/47
Significance of Higher-order PMD
Ref: M. Karlsson, et al., Optics Letters, 1999;
H. Kogelnik, et al., JLT 2003.
"It is sometimes stated that once the signal bandwidth is large enough for second-order PMD
to be important, then all other higher order terms become important too. If this were strictly
true, then higher order PMD compensation would be a hopeless task there is a need for
closer examination of these bandwidth limitations.
$&
ACF
(ps2) $&PSP
-H. Kogelnik, et al., JLT 2003
PSP Bandwidth
Autocorrelation Function of PMD Vector Higher-orders become
important if signal BW
> $&PSP
Theory
Measurement
Fiber typeOld fiber
PMD = 0.5 ps/km1/2
New fiberPMD = 0.1 ps/km1/2
Future fiberPMD = 0.05 ps/km1/2
1 Tb/s Transmission
Limit due to PMD40 m
1 km
4 km
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
37/47
Combined Effects of PMD and PDL
Polarization Mode Dispersion
Polarization Dependent Loss (PDL)
Optical
Components
(PDL=? dB)
$%Different
Attenuation
PSP1 (PSP2
Differential
Group Delay
PSP1(PSP2
Fiber with high PMD
PSP1
PSP2
PSP 1
PSP2
PSP1
PSP2
PSP1(PSP2
PDL:
Frequency-dependent
attenuation
PMD:
Enhanced time spreading
B. Huttner, et al., JSTQE, 2000
L.-S. Yan, etal., PTL, 2003
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
38/47
Combined Effects of PMD and PDL
Probability density function of 15 PMD sections
Without PDLWith 15 PDL sections
(each: 0.2 dB)
L.-S. Yan et. al., JLT 2004
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
39/47
Outline
1. Overarching Perspective
2. Optical Performance Monitoring- optically-assisted techniques
- receiver based techniques
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
40/47
Coherent Detection
!"#$%& ( ")*!+ , + %,-./ +
01 + %23+0( "#$%& ")*-./$ 01#2 1)*3% ( 0)#$%& 4 ))*3 &
All linear distortions (Dispersion, PMD, PDL) can
theoretically be fully compensated. Nonlineardistortion can be partially compensated
Coherently
ReceivedElectrical Signal
~
Electric Field
Vector ofOptical Signal
LinearSystem
Signal Amplitude Signal Phase
90oHybrid
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
41/47
# Limited to receivers.
MotivationAsynchronous Sampling (by MDI)
(Asynchronous sampling)
Clean Noise CD
PMD Crosstalk All
Input
DataDelay
Sampling
On-Off-Keying Data
Unique impairment pattern!multiple impairments monitoring
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
42/47
Router
ONE
ONE
Router
Router
Optical Network
End Customer
Re-route or feed backinformation tocontrol the ONE
Trained receiversto
automatically identifyimpairments
ONE
Send error
signals
Fiber link withvarious impairments
Router
Self-Managed Optical Networks
! Monitored information can be sent to the network controller andoptical network elements to rapidly reroute the data information
X. Wu et al, J. Lightwave Technol. 27 (16), 2009.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
43/47
Concept - ANNs Trained w/ Eye Diagram Parameters
! It is obvious that different impairment combinations producedistinct features in the eye diagrams! The input parameters for training are derived from eye diagrams
% Q-factor, eye-closure, jitter, and crossing amplitude! The controlled impairments are used as outputs for training
Tx
Rx
OSNR = 36 dBCD = 0DGD = 0
OSNR = 28 dBCD = 0DGD = 0
OSNR = 20 dBCD = 0DGD = 0
OSNR = 28 dB
CD = 60 ps/nmDGD = 0
OSNR = 28 dB
CD = 0DGD = 10 ps
OSNR = 28 dB
CD = 60 ps/nmDGD = 10 psF
iberLink
X. Wu et al, J. Lightwave Technol. 27 (16), 2009.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
44/47
Artificial Neural Networks
Advantages of ANN Approach
! Efficient identification and isolation of multiple impairments! Enhanced monitoring range and sensitivity! Simple and fast processing of the monitored information! Format transparent
X. Wu et al, J. Lightwave Technol. 27 (16), 2009.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
45/47
Crossing Amp.
OSNRCD
DGD
3-Layer ANN Model12 Hidden Neurons
64 Testing Samples
Q-factor
Closure
Jitter
OSNR
CD
DGD
3-Layer ANN Model
12 Hidden Neurons
Conjugant Gradient
Training
125 Samples
Q-factor
Closure
Jitter
Crossing Amp.
40-Gb/s RZ-OOK testing results
40-Gb/s RZ-DPSK testing results
Training Errors for OOK and DPSK Systems
Block Diagrams for ANN Training and Testing
X. Wu, ECOC 2008
OSNR/CD/PMD Identifications using ANNs
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
46/47
OSNR=36,
CD=0, DGD=0
OSNR = 16, CD=0,
DGD = 0
OSNR = 36, CD=60,
DGD = 0
OSNR = 36, CD=0,
DGD = 10
OSNR = 20, CD=45,
DGD = 7.5
OSNR = 16, CD=60,
DGD = 10
Concept - ANNs Trained w/ Delay-Tap Plot Parameters
! It is obvious that different impairment combinations producedistinct features in the delay-tap plots
X. Wu et al, ECOC 2009, paper P3.04.
-
8/12/2019 Optical Monitoring
47/47