optimized chilled water plant controls 2013-11-12-1 · pdf fileoptimizing chilled water plant...

78
Optimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Upload: vanthien

Post on 01-Feb-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Optimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls

Steven T. Taylor, PETaylor EngineeringAlameda, CA

November 12, 2013

Page 2: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

2

Agenda

Chilled Water Distribution System Selection

Determining Optimized Sequences Chilled Water Pump Control Chilled Water Temperature and DP

Setpoint Reset Tower Fan Speed Control Condenser Water Pump Control Chiller Staging Waterside Economizer Control

Page 3: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

3

Primary Resources Optimized Design & Control of Chilled Water

Plants, ASHRAE Journal• Part 1: Chilled Water Distribution System Selection• Part 2: Condenser Water Distribution System Design• Part 3: Pipe Sizing and Optimizing ∆T • Part 4: Chiller & Cooling Tower Selection• Part 5: Optimized Control Sequences

All are available at no charge from http://www.taylor-engineering.com/publications/articles.shtml

Page 4: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

4

Optimizing Energy Usage Chillers

• Type, efficiency, size, VSD Cooling Towers

• Fan type, efficiency, approach, range, speed control, flow turndown

Chilled Water Pumps• Arrangement, flow rate (delta-T), pressure drop, VSD

Condenser Water Pumps• Flow rate (delta-T), pressure drop

Air Handling Units• Coil sizing, air-side pressure drop, water-side pressure

drop

Page 5: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

5

RecommendedChilled Water Distribution Arrangement

Independent Variables Recommended SystemNumber of

Coils/Loads ServedNumber of

ChillersSize of Coils/Loads

ServedControl Valves

Distribution Type

One Any Any None Primary-only single coil

More than one One Small (< ~100 gpm)2-way and 3-way

Primary-only, single chiller

Few coils serving similar loads

More than one

Small (< ~100 gpm) 3-way Primary-only constant flow

Many coils serving similar loads or any serving dissimilar loads

More than one

Small (< ~100 gpm) 2-wayPrimary-Only or

Primary-Secondary

More than one Any Large Campus 2-way Primary−Distributed Secondary

More than one AnyLarge coils (> ~100

gpm)None Primary−Coil Secondary

Page 6: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

6

CHILLER

CHW PUMP

OPTIONAL STORAGE

TANK

COIL

SUPPLY AIR TEMPERATURE

SUPPLY WATER TEMPERATURE

Single Coil – Single Chiller

Page 7: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

7

CHILLER

CHW PUMP

COIL2-WAY VALVE

SUPPLY WATER TEMPERATURE

VFD

DP SENSOR

3-WAY VALVE

Primary-only - Single chiller

3-Way Valve• Sized for minimum flow of

chiller• Locate at end of system

• Engage mass• Retain self-balancing

Page 8: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

8

Primary-only Constant Flow

Page 9: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

9

Secondary Pump w/ VFD

at Chiller Plant

2-Way Control Valves at AHUs

Secondary Pump w/ VFD

at Chiller Plant

2-Way Control Valves at AHUs

Primary/Secondary

Page 10: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

10

Primary/Distributed Secondary

Central Plant

Distributed Secondary

Pump w/ VFD -Typical at each

Building

No Secondary Pumps at

Plant

Page 11: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

11

Distributed P/S versus Conventional P/S or P/S/T

Advantages• Reduced Pump HP - Each Pump Sized for Head

From Building to Plant• Self-balancing• No Over-pressurized Valves at Buildings Near Plant• Reduced Pump Energy, Particularly When One or

More Buildings Are off Line• No Expensive, Complex Bridge Connections Used

in P/S/T Systems• Similar or Lower First Costs

Disadvantages (vs. P/S)• Pump room needed at building • Higher expansion tank pre-charge and size

Page 12: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

12

Primary/Coil Secondary

Large AHU-1

Distributed Secondary

Pump w/ VFD -Typical at each AHU

No Secondary Pumps at Plant

Large AHU-2

No Control Valves at AHUs

Page 13: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

13

Hybrid systems

Page 14: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

14

Advantages of VFD Coil Pumps versus Conventional P/S system

Reduced Pump HP • Each pump sized for head from coil to plant• Eliminated 10 feet or so for control valves

Self-balancing• No need for or advantages to balancing valves, reverse return

Lower Pump Energy• No minimum DP setpoint• Pump efficiency constant

Better Control• Smoother flow control - no valve hysteresis• No valve over-pressurization problems

Usually Lower First Costs Due to Eliminated Control Valves, Reduced Pump and VFD HP

Page 15: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

15

Disadvantages of VFD Coil Pumps versus conventional P/S system

Cannot Tap into Distribution System without Pump• May be problem with small coils (low flow, high

head pump) Possible Reduced Redundancy/Reliability

unless Duplex Coil Pumps are Added Possible Low Load Temperature

Fluctuations• Minimum speed on pump motor• May need to cycle pump at very low loads

Page 16: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

16

Primary-only System

BYPASS VALVE

Headered Pumps & Auto Isolation Valves Preferred to Dedicated Pumps:• Allows slow staging• Allows 1 pump/2 chiller operation• Allows 2 pump/1 chiller operation if there is low ∆T

Flow Meter or DP Sensor Across Chiller

Page 17: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

17

Advantages of primary-only versus primary/secondary system

Lower First Costs Less Plant Space Required Reduced Pump HP

• Reduced pressure drop due to fewer pump connections, less piping

• Higher efficiency pumps (unless more expensive reduced speed pumps used on primary side)

Lower Pump Energy• Reduced connected HP• “Cube Law” savings due to VFD and variable flow

through both primary and secondary circuit

Page 18: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

18

Pump EnergyPrimary vs. Primary/Secondary (3-chiller plant)

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

% GPM

Pum

p kW

Primary-only

Primary-secondary

Page 19: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

19

Disadvantages of primary-only versus primary/secondary system

Failure of Bypass Control• Not as fail-safe - what if valve or controls fail?• Must avoid abrupt flow shut-off (e.g. valves interlocked with

AHUs all timed to stop at same time)• Must be well tuned to avoid chiller short-cycling

Flow Fluctuation when Staging Chillers On• Flow drops through operating chillers• Possible chiller trips, even evaporator freeze-up• Must first reduce demand on operating chillers and/or slowly

increase flow through starting chiller; causes temporary high CHWS temperatures

(Problems above are seldom an issue with very large plants, e.g. more than 3 chillers)

Page 20: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

20

Primary-only System Staging

1000 GPM

0 GPM

0 GPM

Page 21: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

21

Primary-only System Staging

500 GPM

500 GPM

0 GPM

Page 22: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

22

Variable FlowPrimary/Secondary with CHW Storage

Advantages• Peak shaving• Simplifies chiller staging• Provides back-up for chiller

failure• Secondary water source for fire

department• Secondary water source for

cooling towers Disadvantages

• Installed cost• Space

Page 23: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

23

Primary-only vs. Primary/Secondary

Use Primary-only Systems for:• Plants with many chillers (more than three) and with

fairly high base loads where the need for bypass is minimal or nil and flow fluctuations during staging are small due to the large number of chillers; and

• Plants where design engineers and future on-site operators understand the complexity of the controls and the need to maintain them.

Otherwise Use Primary-secondary• Also for plants with CHW storage

Page 24: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Optimizing Control Sequences

Page 25: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Generic Chilled Water Plant 1000 Tons total capacity Dual chillers/pumps/towers Variable speed drives on

everything (optional on CWPs)

Page 26: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

26

Optimum Sequences All plants are different

• Tower efficiency, approach• Chiller efficiency, unloading control• Pump efficiency, head, unloading control• Number of chillers, pumps, towers

Too many independent variables• CT fan speed• Chiller staging• CW pump speed

What is the optimum control sequence for a given plant?

Can sequences be generalized to apply to any plant based on plant design parameters?

Page 27: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

27

Equipment Models Chillers

• Hydeman et al, Regression Based Electric Chiller Model• Multi-point calibration using zero-tolerance manufacturer’s

data Towers

• DOE-2.2 model calibrated using manufacturer’s data Pumps

• Multiple piping sections ∆P=C*GPM1.8

• Pump efficiency from regression of manufacturer’s data VFD and motor efficiency

• Part load curves from manufacturer’s data

Page 28: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

28

Generic Plant Design Options

Plant• Office building • Peak Load = 900 ton• Two chillers each 500 ton• Two CW pumps & towers• Two CHW pumps• All variable speed

Climate: • 3C: Oakland• 4B: Albuquerque• 5C: Chicago

Chillers: • A: two stage R-123 hermetic• B: one stage R-134a open

drive

Tower Approach• -A: 3 ~ 5F• -B: 5 ~ 7F• -C: 7 ~ 10F• -D: 9 ~ 12F

Tower Range: • -1: 9F• -2: 12F• -3: 15F

Tower Efficiency • H: ~90 gpm/hp• M: ~70 gpm/hp• L: ~50 gpm/hp

Page 29: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Theoretical Optimum Plant Performance (TOPP) Model

Run Time: ~5 hours/run * 216 runs = 1080 hours, not including analysis!

Page 30: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

30

TOPP Plant Energy: Oakland

Page 31: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

31

Determining Sequences

Plot TOPP results vs. various independent variables to see if there are trends

Once independent variables are selected, determine correlations

Test the sequence using the models to see how close they are to the TOPP

Page 32: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Chilled Water Pumps

Page 33: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

33

Controlling CHW Pumps

Primary-only and Secondary CHW Pumps• Control speed by differential pressure

measured as far out in system as possible and/or reset setpoint by valve demand

• Stage pumps by differential pressure PID loop speed signal:Start lag pump at 90% speedStop lag pump at 40% speedFor large HP pumps, determine flow and speed

setpoints with detailed energy analysis

Page 34: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

34

VSD Pump Power vs. Setpoint

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Percent GPM

Perc

ent P

ump

kW

DP setpoint = Design HeadDP setpoint = Head*.75DP setpoint =Head/2DP setpoint =Head/3DP setpoint = 0 (reset)

Page 35: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

35

Chilled Water Setpoint Reset Reset Impacts

• Resetting CHWST upwards reduces chiller energy but will increase pump energy in VSD variable flow systems

• Dehumidification Reset with “open” or indirect control loops (e.g. OAT) can starve coils

and reduce dehumidification Reset by control valve position will never hurt dehumidification −

humidity of supply determined almost entirely by supply air temperature setpoint, not CHWST

Recommendations• Reset from control valve position using Trim & Respond logic• For variable flow systems with VSDs

Reset of CHWST and VSD differential pressure setpoint must be sequenced − not independent like VAV systems since control valves are pressure-dependent

Sequence reset of CHWST and DP − next slide…

Page 36: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

36

CHWST/DP Setpoint Reset for VSD CHW System

Back off on CHWST first Then back off on DP setpoint first Reverse this for constant speed chillers

Tmin+ 15ºF

Tmin

DPmax

5 psi

CHW setpoint

CHW setpoint

DP setpoint

DP setpoint

CHW Plant Reset 0 100% 50%

Page 37: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

37

CHW vs. DP Setpoint Reset

Plant with 150 ft CHW pump head, variable speed chillers

Page 38: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

38

CHW Pump Staging

Percent of Design Flow

Percent of Pump Speed

Opt

imum

Num

ber o

f P

umps

One Pump: CHWFR <47% Two Pumps: CHWFR >47% Time delays to prevent short-cycling

TOPP Model Results

Page 39: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Cooling Towers

Page 40: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

40

Tower Isolation Options

1. Select tower weir dams & nozzles to allow one pump to serve all towers

• Always most efficient• Almost always least

expensive• Usually possible with 2 or 3

cells2. Install isolation valves

on supply lines only• Need to oversize equalizers

3. Install isolation valves on both supply & return

• Usually most expensive • Easiest to design• Valve sequencing issues and

possible failure

COOLINGTOWER #1

COOLINGTOWER #2

COOLINGTOWER #3

COOLINGTOWER #1

COOLINGTOWER #2

COOLINGTOWER #3

COOLINGTOWER #1

COOLINGTOWER #2

COOLINGTOWER #3

Page 41: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

41

Tower Fan Control

Free Cooling~ 15% of Capacity

Single SpeedFan

Two-Speed orVariable-SpeedFan

% Capacity

% Power

One Cell Tower

Page 42: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

42

Tower Fan Control

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%

% Capacity

% P

ower

Two 1-Speed Fans

Two 2-Speed Fans

One 1-Speed Fan andOne 2-Speed Fan

Free Cooling Below 15% Capacity

Two Variable Speed

Two Cell Tower

Page 43: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

43

Tower Efficiency LCC

90 GPM/HP 70 GPM/HP 50 GPM/HP

1000 ton Oakland Office

ASHRAE Efficiency:

The flow rate the tower can cool from 95F to 85F at 75F wetbulb temperature divided by fan power (GPM/HP)

Page 44: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

44

Tower ApproachOakland Office Oakland Data Center

Page 45: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

45

Optimum Approach Temperature

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

Tower App

roach + Ra

nge

Cooling Degree‐Days ‐ base 50F

OaklandChicago

Albuquerque

Miami

AtlantaLas Vegas

50CWA CDDTT 001.027

Page 46: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

46

Tower Efficiency Guidelines

Use Propeller Fans • Avoid centrifugal except where high static needed• Consider low-noise propeller blade option and high

efficiency tower where low sound power is required Efficiency

• Minimum 80 gpm/hp for commercial occupancies• Minimum 100 gpm/hp for 24/7 plants (data centers)

Approach• Commercial occupancies: See previous slide

8°F to 9°F for Bay Area

• 24/7 plants (data centers): 3°F

Page 47: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

47

Reset by Wetbulb Temperature?

Page 48: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

48

“Lift” (CWRT-CHWST) vs. %Load

Lift Reset Best Fit for Offices

Wetbulb reset best for data centers since load does not vary

Page 49: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

49

Tower Control LIFT = A*PlantLoadRatio + B

• Bounded by minimum LIFT at minimum PLR (from manufacturer) and maximum LIFT (design lift)

• CWRT setpoint = LIFT + CHWST• Control CT fans to maintain CWRT

A and B coefficients • Best optimized by modeling• Rough estimate:

LIFTd= design lift = CWRTdesign – CHWSTdesign LIFTm= Minimum lift at minimum loadA = (LIFTd – LIFTm)/0.7B = LIFTd - A

Page 50: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Condenser Water Pump

Page 51: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

51

CW pump Control

Constant speed CW pumps• Stage along with chillers

Variable speed CW pumps?

Page 52: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

52

%CW Loop Flow vs. %Plant Load

Page 53: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

53

VSD CWP Control Logic

Pump speed control• CWFR = C*PLR + D • CWFSP = CWFR*CWDF• Control speed to maintain CW flow at setpoint

Staging• Same logic as CHW pumps

Disadvantages• Requires flow meter• C and D coefficients only optimized by simulation

Page 54: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

54

CWLoopFlowRatio = C*PlantLoadRatio + D

C = ‐0.0000811 * CDD55 + ‐0.01293 * WB + 3.486 * NPLV + ‐0.02476 * APPROACH + 0.07400 * RANGE D = ‐0.797 + 2.282 * IPLV + 0.002196 * APPROACH + ‐0.00795 * RANGE

Coefficient C Coefficient D

Page 55: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

55

Even Optimum Savings are Small

OaklandMiami AtlantaLas

Vegas Albuquerque Chicago

Page 56: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

56

Answer: VFDs on CWPs are Not Cost Effective for Office Buildings

Life

Cyc

le C

osts

, $

Page 57: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

57

Energy Use May Increase!Performance in Miami using C and D optimized for Oakland

Oakland

Page 58: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

58

Miami

Oakland :Miami:

y = 0.9069x + 0.0388

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

CW gpm

% Total Plant  Design Capacity

CW gpm vs % Load

Page 59: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

59

Recommendations

For offices etc., use constant speed pumps

For data centers and other 24/7 plants• Use VFDs• Determine C and D coefficients through

modelingOther logic may increase energy usage

Page 60: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

Chiller Staging

Page 61: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

61

Staging Fixed Speed Chillers

Fixed Speed Chillers• Operate no more chillers than required to meet

the load • Stage on when operating chillers maxed out as

indicated by measured load (GPM, T), CHWST, flow, or other load indicator.

• For primary-secondary systems w/o check valve in the common, start chiller to ensure Primary-flow > Secondary-flow

• Stage off when measured load/flow indicates load is less than operating capacity less one chiller – be conservative to prevent short cycling

Page 62: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

62

Staging Variable Speed Chillers

Page 63: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

63

Part Load Chiller Performancew/ Zero ARI Tolerance

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

% Load (with Condenser Relief)

%kW

Fixed SpeedVariable Speed

Page 64: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

64

Two-Chiller Plant Performance at Low Load

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

% Plant Load

%P

lant

kW

(in

clud

ing

PC

HW

& C

W p

umps

)

Variable Speed - one ch illerFixed Speed - one chillerVariable Speed - two chille rsFixed Speed - two chille rs

Running two VFD chillers is more efficient until 35% load

Running two fixed speed chillers always uses more energy

Page 65: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

65

Cautionary Note

Staging logic must limit possibility for surge operation for centrifugal chillers

Some variable speed chillers don’t dynamically measure surge conditions• You will lose some of the savings with primary-

only variable flow systems because minimum speed may have to be increased to avoid surge

• You may have premature tripping due to onset of surge otherwise

• This is only an issue with variable evaporator flow systems (like primary-only variable flow)

Page 66: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

66

Surge Region

Ref

riger

ant H

ead

Load

100% speed90%

80%

70%

60%

Ref

riger

ant L

ift

Load

Staging & Surge

One ChillerTwo Chillers

One ChillerTwo Chillers

Page 67: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

67

Correlation with Lift & Load

Page 68: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

68

Generic Control Sequences All-variable speed plant

FTTESPLR CHWSCWR )(

Stage Chillers on

Nominal Capacity Stage up to next stage if either: Stage down to

lower stage if:

0 All off 0 −

Any Chiller Plant Requests and

OAT>LOT and schedule is active

2 Lead chiller 50%

for 15 minutes load greater than

SPLR

CHW Plant Reset = 100 for 15

minutes, and load greater than 30%

No Chiller Plant Requests for 5

minutes or OAT<(LOT-5F)

or schedule is inactive

3 Both chillers 100% − −

for 15 minutes load less than

SPLR

Page 69: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

69

Determining E and F

TE Correlations• E = 0.057 - 0.000569*WB - 0.0645*IPLV -

0.000233*APPROACH - 0.000402*RANGE + 0.0399*KW/TON

• F = -1.06 + 0.0145*WB + 2.16*IPLV + 0.0068*APPROACH + 0.0117*RANGE -1.33*KW/TON

Need to test for reasonablenessDefault values

• E=0.004 and F = 0.30

Page 70: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

70

Example

Oakland office building All variable speed plantTOPP model coefficients

• A = 47, B =5.2• C = 1.3, D = 0.13• E = 0.009, F = 0.21

Page 71: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

71

TOPP vs. Real Sequences

Page 72: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

72

Waterside Economizers

Page 73: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

PLATE & FRAMEHEAT EXCHANGER

CHILLER #1

CHILLER #2

COOLINGTOWER #2

COOLINGTOWER#1

Non-Integrated

Economizer

65F

Twb 34F

44F

47F

47F

44F

Hours in SF Bay Area with Twb <= 34F??

10 hrs/yr

Page 74: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

PLATE & FRAMEHEAT EXCHANGER

CHILLER #1

CHILLER #2

EITHER PUMPOR VALVE

(NOT BOTH)

COOLINGTOWER #2

COOLINGTOWER#1

MODULATINGVALVE Integrated

Economizer Primary/Secondary

65F

Twb 52F

59F

47F

62F

59F

Hours in SF Bay Area with Twb <= 52F??

4000 hrs/yr

9%

47F41%

0%

50%load

Page 75: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

COOLINGTOWER #2

COOLINGTOWER#1

PLATE & FRAMEHEAT EXCHANGER

CHILLER #1

CHILLER #2

BYPASSWSE-ONLY

MODULATINGVALVE

Integrated Economizer Primary Only

65F

Twb 52F

59F

47F

62F

59F

15%

47F38%

38%

90%load

75%load

Page 76: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

76

Integrated WSE Control Sequences

Run all air handlers, including redundant units with variable speed drives

Reset CHWST setpoint based on valve demand Enable WSE if CHWRT > predicted HXLWT + 2

• Predicted HXLWT = Ambient wetbulb + HX_Approach + Tower_Approach HX_Approach = Design HX approach * %HX-Load Tower_Approach = Design Tower approach for office type occupancies

= Adjust based on WBT from manufacturer’s data for data center– see slide 5

Disable WSE if HXLWT > CHWRT - 2 Disable chiller(s) when HXLWT ≤ CHWST setpoint Enable chiller(s) when CHWST > setpoint Run as many tower cells as minimum flow will allow Tower speed:

• When WSE is disabled control speed “normally”• When WSE and chiller(s) are enabled run 95% speed• When chiller is disabled control speed to maintain CHWST setpoint76

Page 77: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

77

Summary

In this seminar, you have learned how to• Select optimum chilled water distribution system• Optimally controlChilled Water PumpsChilled Water Temperature and DP Setpoint ResetTower FansCondenser Water PumpsChiller StagingWaterside Economizers

Page 78: Optimized Chilled Water Plant Controls 2013-11-12-1 · PDF fileOptimizing Chilled Water Plant Design & Controls Steven T. Taylor, PE Taylor Engineering Alameda, CA November 12, 2013

78

Questions