optimizing nutrient removal review & case studies

146
1 Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies Webinar for Tennessee Wastewater Operators February 17, 2021 Grant Weaver, PE & wastewater operator President CleanWaterOps [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 06-May-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

1

Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review &

Case StudiesWebinar for TennesseeWastewater Operators

February 17, 2021

Grant Weaver, PE & wastewater [email protected]

Page 2: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Strategies for Optimizing Nutrient Removal

Week 1: Nitrogen RemovalWeek 2: Phosphorus Removal

Today: Nitrogen & Phosphorus Review & Case StudiesFeb 24: N&P Removal in Oxidation Ditch wwtpsMar 3: N&P Removal in SBRsMar 10: N&P Removal in Conventional Activated Sludge

Mar 17: Brainstorming N&P Removal Opportunities for Tennessee Wastewater Treatment Plants

2

Page 3: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nutrient Removal Knowledge

3

Page 4: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 5: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Step 1: Convert Ammonia (NH4) to Nitrate (NO3)

Step 2: Convert Nitrate (NO3) to Nitrogen Gas (N2)

Oxygen-rich Aerobic ProcessDon’t need BOD for bacteria to growBacteria are sensitive to pH and temperature

Oxygen-poor Anoxic ProcessDo need BOD for bacteria to growBacteria are hardy

Page 6: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Ammonia Removal -1st Step of N Removal

Page 7: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Ammonia (NH4)

Ammonia RemovalAmmonia (NH4) is converted to Nitrate (NO3)

Page 8: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Ammonia Removal

Ammonia (NH4)

Oxygen (O2)

Page 9: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Ammonia Removal

Ammonia (NH4)

Alkalinity

Oxygen (O2)

H+

Page 10: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Ammonia (NH4)

Nitrite (NO2)

Alkalinity

Oxygen (O2)

H+

Ammonia Removal

Page 11: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Ammonia Removal

Ammonia (NH4)

Nitrite (NO2)

Alkalinity

Oxygen (O2) Oxygen (O2)

H+

Page 12: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Ammonia Removal

Ammonia (NH4)

Nitrite (NO2)

Nitrate (NO3)

Alkalinity

Oxygen (O2) Oxygen (O2)

H+

Page 13: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrification:Ammonia (NH4) is converted to Nitrate (NO3)

Oxygen Rich HabitatMLSS* of 2500+ mg/L (High Sludge Age / MCRT / low F:M)ORP* of +100 to +150 mV (High DO)Time* (high HRT … 24 hr, 12 hr, 6 hr)Low BOD

Consumes Oxygen Adds acid - Consumes 7 mg/L alkalinity per mg/L of NH4 → NO3

*Approximate, each facility is different.

Page 14: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrate Removal - 2nd

Step of N removal

Page 15: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrate Removal

Nitrate (NO3)

Page 16: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrate Removal

Nitrate (NO3)

BOD

Page 17: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrate Removal

Nitrate (NO3)

Nitrogen Gas (N2)

BOD

Page 18: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrate Removal

Nitrate (NO3)

Nitrogen Gas (N2)

OxygenBOD

Page 19: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrate Removal

Nitrate (NO3)

Nitrogen Gas (N2)

Alkalinity

OxygenBOD

Adds DO (dissolved oxygen)Consumes BODGives back alkalinity … beneficially raises pH

Page 20: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Denitrification: Nitrate (NO3) is converted to Nitrogen Gas (N2)

Oxygen Poor HabitatORP* of -100 mV or less (DO less than 0.3 mg/L)Surplus BOD* (100-250 mg/L: 5-10 times as much as NO3)Retention Time* of 1-2 hours

Gives back OxygenGives back Alkalinity (3.5 mg/L per mg/L of NO3 → N2)

*Approximate, each facility is different.

Page 21: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrogen Removal

DO: Dissolved Oxygen

ORP: Oxygen Reduction Potential

MLSS: Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids

HRT: Hydraulic Retention Time

BOD: Biochemical Oxygen Demand

Alkalinity

Note: All numbers are approximations, “rules of thumb”

Step 1: Nitrification (Ammonia Removal)

1 mg/L or more

+100 mV or more +

2500 mg/L or more

6 or more hours

less than 20 mg/L

60 mg/L or more

Alkalinity is lost

Step 1: Denitrification (Nitrate Removal)

Less than 0.2 mg/L

Less than -100 mV

Same

1 or more hours

100 mg/L or more

Alkalinity is gained

Page 22: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

22

Page 23: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

MLE Process(Modified Ludzack-Ettinger)

Page 24: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Internal Recycle

Secondary Clarifier

Return Sludge

Aerobic Zone

Anoxic Zone

NH4 NO3

MLE (Modified Ludzack-Ettinger) Process

Page 25: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Internal Recycle

Secondary Clarifier

Return Sludge

Aerobic Zone

Anoxic Zone

NH4

MLE (Modified Ludzack-Ettinger) Process

NO3

Page 26: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Internal Recycle

Secondary Clarifier

Return Sludge

Aerobic Zone

Anoxic Zone

NH4N2

MLE (Modified Ludzack-Ettinger) Process

NO3

Page 27: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

27

Page 28: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Sequencing Batch ReactorSBR

Page 29: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

IdleAir ON

Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)Ammonia (NH4) Removal: Nitrification

Sludge Storage

NO3NH4

SBR #1 SBR #2

Page 30: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

IdleAir OFF

Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)Nitrate (NO3) Removal: Denitrification

Sludge Storage

N2NO3

SBR #1 SBR #2

Page 31: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Air ONDecant / Waste

Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)Settle, Decant & Waste Sludge

Sludge Storage

SBR Process Control:Establish cycle times that are long enough to provide optimal habitats.And, short enough to allow all of the flow to be nitrified and denitrified.

SBR #1 SBR #2

Page 32: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

32

Page 33: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Oxidation Ditch

Page 34: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Secondary Clarifier

Oxidation Ditch

Anoxic Zone

Aerobic Zone

Anoxic Zone

Aerobic Zone

NH4

Page 35: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Secondary Clarifier

Oxidation Ditch

Anoxic Zone

Aerobic Zone

Anoxic Zone

Aerobic Zone

NO3

NH4

Page 36: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Secondary Clarifier

Oxidation Ditch

Anoxic Zone

Aerobic Zone

Anoxic Zone

Aerobic Zone

NO3

N2

Page 37: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

37

Page 38: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 39: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Biological Phosphorus Removal

Step 1: prepare “dinner”

VFA (volatile fatty acids) production in anaerobic/fermentive conditions

Step 2: “eat”

Bio-P bugs (PAOs, “phosphate accumulating organisms”) eat VFAs in anaerobic/fermentive conditions … temporarily releasing more P into the water

Step 3: “breathe” and grow

Bio-P bugs (PAOs) take in almost all of the soluble P in aerobic conditions as they grow and reproduce

Page 40: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

40

Page 41: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Biological Phosphorus Removal:Mainstream Flow Fermentation Processes

Page 42: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

In Anaerobic Tank …

Bacteria break down complex BOD into VFAs (volatile fatty acids).

VFAs

Page 43: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

PO4

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

In Anaerobic Tank …

Bacteria break down complex BOD into VFAs (volatile fatty acids).

PAO bacteria (phosphate accumulating organisms) take in VFAs as energy source & temporarily release PO4 (phosphate) into solution.

VFAs

Page 44: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

PO4

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

In Anaerobic Tank …

Bacteria break down complex BOD into VFAs (volatile fatty acids).

PAO bacteria (phosphate accumulating organisms) take in VFAs as energy source & temporarily release PO4 (phosphate) into solution.

In Aeration Tank …

Energized PAO bacteria take PO4 out of solution.

Page 45: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

PO4

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

In Anaerobic Tank …

Bacteria break down complex BOD into VFAs (volatile fatty acids).

PAO bacteria (phosphate accumulating organisms) take in VFAs as energy source & temporarily release PO4 (phosphate) into solution.

In Aeration Tank …

Energized PAO bacteria take PO4 out of solution.

Page 46: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anoxic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

Pre-anoxic zone to …

Strengthen anaerobic conditions in anaerobic tank

Minimize VFA use by denitrifying bacteria – the ones that convert Nitrate (NO3) to Nitrogen Gas (N2) – by “feeding” influent to the denitrifiers.

Anaerobic Tank

Page 47: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anoxic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

Pre-anoxic zone to …

Strengthen anaerobic conditions in anaerobic tank

Minimize VFA use by denitrifying bacteria – the ones that convert Nitrate (NO3) to Nitrogen Gas (N2) – by “feeding” influent to the denitrifiers.

PO4

Anaerobic Tank

VFAs

Page 48: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anoxic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

Pre-anoxic zone to …

Strengthen anaerobic conditions in anaerobic tank

Minimize VFA use by denitrifying bacteria – the ones that convert Nitrate (NO3) to Nitrogen Gas (N2) – by “feeding” influent to the denitrifiers.

PO4

Anaerobic Tank

Page 49: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Mainstream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anoxic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

Pre-anoxic zone to …

Strengthen anaerobic conditions in anaerobic tank

Minimize VFA use by denitrifying bacteria – the ones that convert Nitrate (NO3) to Nitrogen Gas (N2) – by “feeding” influent to the denitrifiers.

PO4

Anaerobic Tank

Page 50: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

50

Page 51: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Biological Phosphorus Removal: Combined Sidestream & Mainstream Fermentation

Page 52: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Sidestream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

VFAs

Fermentation

Page 53: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Sidestream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

VFAs

Fermentation

Page 54: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Sidestream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

VFAs

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

StorageFermentation

Page 55: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Sidestream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

PO4

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

StorageFermentation

Page 56: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Sidestream Fermentation Process

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

PO4

Nitrogen Interference: Nitrate (NO3) will consume VFAsGravity

Thickener Sludge Storage

Fermentation

Page 57: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Bio-P Removal: Sidestream Fermentation Process

Secondary Clarifier

Gravity Thickener Sludge

StorageFermentation

Anoxic Tank

Anaerobic Tank

Aeration Tank

Page 58: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

58

Page 59: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

59

Page 60: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Less than 3x ortho-P leaving Anaerobic Tank

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

StorageFermentation

If Anaerobic Tank isn’t really anaerobic …

… turn off mixer(s)

Page 61: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

3x ortho-P leaving Anaerobic Tank but high effluent P

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

StorageFermentation

1. Poor removal in Aeration Tank …

2.0 mg/L DO / +150 mV ORP6.8+ pHIf seasonal, maybe too little BOD

2. Rerelease … most likely in clarifier(s)

Profile ortho-P through the plant

Page 62: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Optimizing Bio-P Removal: Mainstream or Sidestream Fermentation

Anaerobic Tank2 hour HRT (hydraulic retention time)*ORP of -200 mV* 25 times as much BOD as influent ortho-P*Ortho-P release (3 times influent ortho-P)*

Aeration TankDO of 2.0 mg/LORP of +150 mVpH of 7.0+*Ortho-P concentration of 0.05 mg/L*

*Approximate: Every Plant is Different

Page 63: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

63

Page 64: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Getting creative …

Biological Phosphorus removal from plants not designed as EBPR (enhanced biological

phosphorus removal) facilities

64

Page 65: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Home Grown Sidestream Fermenter

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Anaerobic Tank

Gravity Thickener Sludge

StorageFermentation

Page 66: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Home Grown Sidestream Fermenter

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Gravity Thickener Sludge

Storage

Page 67: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Home Grown Sidestream Fermenter

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Gravity Thickener Sludge

StorageFermenter

Page 68: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Primary Clarifier

Home Grown Sidestream Fermenter

Aeration Tank

Secondary Clarifier

Gravity Thickener Fermenter

Page 69: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

69

Grant [email protected]

Page 70: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Number of Operators at your plant

70

Page 71: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

TENNESSEE71

AthensColliervilleCookevilleCowan

HarrimanLafayetteNashville Dry CreekNorris

Page 72: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Cookeville, Tennessee Population: 33,500 15 MGD design flow

72

Page 73: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

73

Cookeville

Page 74: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

74

Page 75: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

75

Page 76: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 77: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Cookeville - As Designed

Page 78: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Cookeville - As Now Operated

Page 79: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Cookeville - As Now Operated

Page 80: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Cookeville - As Now Operated

Page 81: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

81

Grant [email protected]

Page 82: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Norris, Tennessee Population: 1,450 0.2 MGD design flow

82

Page 83: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

83

Norris

Page 84: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

84

Page 85: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

85

Page 86: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

86

Norris

Page 87: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

87

Norris

Page 88: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

88

Grant [email protected]

Page 89: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nashville Dry Creek Population: 678,000 24 MGD design flow

Page 90: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

90

Nashville Dry Creek

Page 91: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

91

Nashville Dry Creek

Page 92: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

92

Nashville Dry Creek

Page 93: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

93

Nashville Dry Creek

Page 94: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Grant [email protected]

94

Page 95: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Harriman, Tennessee Population: 6,200 1.5 MGD design flow

Page 96: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Harriman, Tennessee

Actual Flow Effluent Nitrogen (mg/L) Effluent Phosphorus (mg/L)

(MGD) Historical Average After Optimization Historical Average After Optimization

1.2 21.5 2.3 2.9 1.4

Page 97: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

97

Harriman - As Designed

Page 98: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

98

Harriman - As Operated

Page 99: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

99

Harriman - As Operated

Page 100: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

100

Harriman - As Operated

Page 101: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

101

Harriman - As Operated

Page 102: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

102

Harriman - As Operated

Page 103: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

103

Grant [email protected]

Page 104: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Athens, Tennessee Population: 13,850 6.0 MGD design flow

104

Page 105: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 106: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

106

Athens

Page 107: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

107

Grant [email protected]

Page 108: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 109: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Pratt, Kansas Population: 6,600 1.0 MGD design flow

109

Page 110: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

110

Page 111: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

111

Grant [email protected]

Page 112: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Wichita, Kansas Population: 390,000 54.4 MGD design flow

112

Page 113: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

113

Wichita Pilot Study

Nitrogen RemovalCycle aeration on/off in Aeration Basin 6

Phosphorus RemovalSide stream fermenter using abandoned centrate tanks

Page 114: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

114

Grant [email protected]

Page 115: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

MONTANA

115

Page 116: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Conrad, Montana Population: 2,500 0.5 MGD design flow

116

Page 117: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 118: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 119: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Conrad, Montana - Nitrogen Removal

Page 120: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Conrad, Montana - Phosphorus Removal

Page 121: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Conrad, Montana - Phosphorus Removal

Page 122: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

122

Grant [email protected]

Page 123: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Chinook, Montana Population: 1,250 0.5 MGD design flow

123

Page 124: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 125: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 126: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

126

Grant [email protected]

Page 127: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Helena, Montana Population: 31,500 5.4 MGD design flow

Page 128: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 129: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies
Page 130: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

130

Helena, Montana - Nitrogen Removal

Page 131: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

131

Helena, Montana - Phosphorus Removal

Page 132: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

132

Grant [email protected]

Page 133: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Acknowledgements, Part 1

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & CONSERVATION (TDEC)Karina Bynum, Sherry Wang, George Garden, Jenny Dodd, Jason Benton, Eddie Bouzied, Bryan Carter, David Duhl, Jordan Fey, Oakley Hall, Michael Murphy, Steve Owens, Rob Ramsey, Sherwin Smith, Robert Tipton, Sandra Vance, John West, Ariel Wessel-Fuss … ATHENSGreg Hayes, Russell Coleman & John SullivanCOOKEVILLERonnie Kelly, Tom Graham & John BufordHARRIMANRay Freeman NASHVILLEJohnnie MacDonald & David TuckerNORRISTony Wilkerson & Doug Snelson

133

Page 134: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Acknowledgements, continued

TENNESSEE, continued Brett Ward (UT-MTAS), Dewayne Culpepper (TAUD), Larry Gamblin (Bartlett), Danny Neely (Baileyton), David Harrison (Collierville), Nic Willis (Cowan), Darryl Green (Henderson), Jack Hauskins & Rocky Hudson (Lafayette) …

KANSAS Tom Stiles … Rod Geisler … Shelly Shores-Miller … Nick Reams … Ryan Eldredge … Kyle Salmon … Mike Disipio … Dave Carr … Clint Gregor … Bruce Hurt … Anthony Zell … Jeff Shanline & Jay Angood (PRATT) … Jamie Belden & Becky Lewis (WICHITA)

MONTANA Paul LaVigne … Pete Boettcher … Josh Viall … Mike Abrahamson … Drue Newfield … Bill Bahr … Dave Frickey … Curt Konecky … Del Phipps … Aaron Losing … Robert Seamons … Grant Burroughs … Gene Connell … Terry Campbell … Anna Miller … Eric Miller & Cory Fox (CHINOOK) … Keith Thaut (CONRAD) … Mark Fitzwater & entire staff (HELENA)

EPA Paul Shriner … Tina Laidlaw … Brendon Held … Craig Hesterlee … Tony Tripp …

… and, many more!

Page 135: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nutrient Removal Knowledge

135

Page 136: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Nitrogen & Phosphorus Removal in Oxidation DitchesWednesday, February 2410:00 - 11:45 AM Central Time…………………………………………………………

Mar 3: N&P Removal in SBRsMar 10: N&P Removal in Conventional Activated SludgeMar 17: Brainstorming N&P Removal Opportunities for Tennessee Wastewater Treatment Plants

Page 137: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Great Bend, Kansas Population: 13,400 3.6 MGD design flow

137

Page 138: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

138

Grant [email protected]

Page 139: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

Helena, Montana Population: 31,500 5.4 MGD design flow

Page 140: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

140

Page 141: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

141

Page 142: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

142

Page 143: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

143

Page 144: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

144

Page 145: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

TENNESSEE145

Page 146: Optimizing Nutrient Removal Review & Case Studies

146