oral presentation final

24
STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR TWO STOREY CARPARK IN UNITEC STUDENT :BAKHTAYAR ZALMAY SUPERVISOR : JONATHAN LEAVER

Upload: bakhtayar-zalmay

Post on 16-Apr-2017

149 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oral Presentation Final

STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR TWO STOREY CARPARK IN UNITEC STUDENT :BAKHTAYAR ZALMAYSUPERVISOR : JONATHAN LEAVER

Page 2: Oral Presentation Final

DESCRIPTION

Page 3: Oral Presentation Final

AIMS• UNDER EQUIVALENT STATIC

HORIZONTAL FORCE FOR EACH LEVEL

• DEFLECTION BY MULTIFRAME

• ANALYSIS AND DESIGN STRUCTURE

• MATERIAL COSTS

• BEST OPTIONS

Page 4: Oral Presentation Final

OBJECTIVES• DEFLECTION: CONCRETE & STEEL

• CALCULATION : STEEL, CONCRETE & REINFORCING SLAB FOR BOTH OPTION

• M*, V* , N*

• 1.2G+1.5Q , 1.35G & EU+G+0.3Q

• MATERIAL COST : CONCRETE & STEEL

• SCHEDULE OF QUANTITIES

Page 5: Oral Presentation Final

METHODOLOGY• PRELIMINARY DESIGN OPTION 1 & 2

• PERMEANT ACTION

• EQUIVALENT STATIC HORIZONTAL FORCE FOR EACH LEVEL

• DESIGN BEAM , COLUMN AND FLOOR

• COST ESTIMATE

• THE FINAL DESIGN

Page 6: Oral Presentation Final

CONCRETE OPTION 1• PRELIMINARY DIMENSION

• PERMANENT ACTIONS

• SEISMIC WEIGHT

• WT = W1 + W2

• =360.49 + 279.62

• = 640.12 KN

Page 7: Oral Presentation Final

DEFLECTION • DEFLECTION BY MULTIFRAME

• PERIOD OF VIBRATION BY RAYLEIGH METHOD

• EQUIVALENT STATIC HORIZONTAL FORCE FOR EACH LEVEL

D2= 7.087 MM = 0.007M

D1= 4.956 MM = 0.004M

Page 8: Oral Presentation Final

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Page 9: Oral Presentation Final

DESIGN BEAM • DESIGN FOR BOTH LEVELS

• COMPRESSION AND TENSION ZONE

• AREA OF REINFORCEMENT AS=T

FY

• BARS= 3 D10 @ 40MM

• CHECK M* CAP= T. JD

Page 10: Oral Presentation Final

DESIGN BEAM • P MIN ≤ P EFFECTIVENESS ≤ P MAX √

• SHEAR REINFORCED REQUIRED

• AV=AREA OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

• 2 LEGGED 10 MM STIRRUPS

• METHODOLOGY AND CALCULATION USED FOR BOTH TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL SECTION

Page 11: Oral Presentation Final

DESIGN COLUMN

Page 12: Oral Presentation Final

DESIGN COLUMN• MAX M* & CORRESPONDING N*

• USING COLUMN DESIGN CHART

• FINDING PT FORM 0.7 AND 0.8 CHARTS

• GROSS AREA OF SECTION

• AG= PT X AS

• 4 D16 BARS

Page 13: Oral Presentation Final

DESIGN COLUMN• P MIN ≤ P EFFECTIVENESS ≤ P MAX √

• SHEAR REINFORCED REQUIRED

• AV=AREA OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

• R10 @ 150 C/C

• METHODOLOGY AND CALCULATION USED FOR BOTH TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL SECTION

Page 14: Oral Presentation Final

DESIGN FOR SLAB FOR BOTH

OPTION • FROM PRELIMINARY DESIGN

• TWO WAY SLAB WITH EDGE OF BEAM TABLE 2.2 NZ 3101 2006

• BENDING MOMENTS FROM

• 1.2 G +1.5 Q BOTH LEVELS

• M*X &M*Y = B WU LX2

• BX AND BY TALBE C 6.2

Page 15: Oral Presentation Final

DESIGN OF SLAB• NO OF BAR = AS REQ

• AS DIA

• 7 HD12 @ 150MM PER 1 M

• TERMINATION POINTS 0.15 LN

• ACCORDING TO STANDARD

Page 16: Oral Presentation Final

STEEL OPTION 2

• PRELIMINARY DIMENSION

COLUMN 310 UC158

BEAM 250UB37.3

• PERMANENT ACTIONS

• SEISMIC WEIGHT

• WT = W1 + W2

• =302.19 + 243.03

• = 545.22 KN

Page 17: Oral Presentation Final

STEEL • DEFLECTION BY MULTIFRAME

• PERIOD OF VIBRATION BY RAYLEIGH METHOD

• EQUIVALENT STATIC HORIZONTAL FORCE FOR EACH LEVEL

D2= 0.558 MM

D1= 0.295 MM

Page 18: Oral Presentation Final

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

BEAM 250UB37.3

• ULTIMATE AND SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATES

• SECTION & MEMBER AND SHEAR CAPACITY

• NZS 3404 1999

• BENDING MOVEMENT M*X AND M*Y

• CALCULATE ᶿM*

• MEMBER * M CAPACITY ≤ SECTION M* CAPACITY

Page 19: Oral Presentation Final

COLUMN 310 UC158

• SECTION & MEMBER CAPACITY

• AXIAL COMPRESSION & TENSION

• N* ≤ N ᶿ S

• N* ≤ Nᶿ C

Page 20: Oral Presentation Final

SCHEDULE OF QUANTITIES FOR BOTH

CONCRETE & STEEL• COSTS WERE TAKEN FROM RAWLINSON'S

NZ CONSTRUCTION HAND BOOK 2001

• ALL PRICE INCLUDED SUPPLY , DELIVERY , PLACING AND FIXING AND LABOURS

• COMPARE THE SCHEDULES WITH RESPECT TO $$$$$ COST $$$$$

Page 21: Oral Presentation Final
Page 22: Oral Presentation Final

CONCLUSIONS • TWO STOREY CAR PARK

• AS/NZS 1170, NZS 3101, NZS 3404

• CONCRETE IS ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR MATERIALS FOR BUILDINGS BECAUSE IT HAS

• HIGH COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, FLEXIBILITY IN ITS FORM AND IT IS WIDELY AVAILABLE.

• FOR SAFETY CONCRETE STRUCTURAL BUILDING, A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MUST UNDERSTAND OF THE LOADING/ACTIONS, STRUCTURE ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN.

Page 23: Oral Presentation Final

REFERENCES 1. AS/NZS 1170.0:2002 STRUCTURAL DESIGN ACTION- GENERAL PRINCIPLES. STANDARDS AUSTRALIAN/NEW ZEALAND.

2. AS/NZS 1170.1:2002 STRUCTURAL DESIGN ACTION- PERMANENT, IMPOSED AND OTHER ACTIONS. STANDARDS AUSTRALIAN/NEW ZEALAND.

3.AS/NZS 1170.5:2004 STRUCTURAL DESIGN ACTION- EARTHQUAKE ACTIONS. STANDARDS AUSTRALIAN/NEW ZEALAND

4.AS/NZS 2890.6:2009: PARKING FACILITIES PART 6: OFF-STREET PARKING FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES. STANDARDS AUSTRALIAN/NEW ZEALAND.

5.BERKOWSKI, P., DMOCHOWSKI, G., & KAZBERUK, M., (2013). ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL AND MATERIAL DEGRATION OF A CAR-PARK’S RC BEARING

STRUCTURE DUE TO CITY ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES. PROCEDIA ENGINEERING.57, 183-192. RETRIEVED FROM HTTP://WWW.SCIENCEDIRECT.COM/

6.GOOGLE. (2015). RETRIEVED FROM HTTPS://WWW.GOOGLE.CO.NZ/MAPS/PLACE/UNITEC+INSTITUTE+OF+TECHNOLOGY/@-

36.8787877,174.7093156,2378M/DATA=!3M1!1E3!4M2!3M1!1S0X6D0D4720A3564DCF:0XAC4FD7893E9A560F

7.RAWLINSONS PUBLICATIONS. (2011).RAWLINSONS NEW ZEALAND CONSTRUCTION HANDBOOK: AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND: PRINT LINK LTD.

Page 24: Oral Presentation Final

QUESTION