organic matrix-mediated biomineralization functions: mechanical design – strength and toughness...
TRANSCRIPT
Organic matrix-mediated biomineralization
Functions:
mechanical design – strength and toughness
mineral passivation – stabilization from dissolution/phase transformation
mineral nucleation – location and organization of nucleation sites
– structure and crystallographic orientation
boundary organization – partitioning with semi-permeable frameworks
The organic matrix is a preformed insoluble macromolecular framework that is a key mediator of controlled biomineralization.
Organic matrices as mechanical frameworks
0
100
200
0.01 0.02 0.03
Strain (l/l)
Str
ess/
MP
a
Antler
Femur
Nacre
Bone strength
normal no matrixtension 130 MPa 6 MPacompression 150 MPa 40 MPa
Young’s modulus 17 GPa 16 GPa(stress/strain = stiffness)
Organic frameworks play an important role in the mechanical design of biomineralized tissues such as bones, shells and teeth. Many of the general functions of these biominerals – movement, protection, cutting and grinding – are dependent on mechanical properties, such as strength and toughness, which are specifically associated with inorganic-organic composites.
Macromolecules and the organic matrix - a general model
Two-component model
Nucleating Functional surface acidic macromolecules
Hydrophobic Structuralframework cross-linked macromolecules
CaCO3
Ca phosphate soluble/insoluble macromolecules
silica
HCl/EDTA
HNO3/HF
N
H
C
H
C
O
CH2
CO O-
N
H
C
H
C
O
CH2
CH2
CO O-
N
H
C
H
C
O
CH2
CCOO-OC
H-O
N
H
C
H
C
O
CH2
OH
Asp Glu -Glu Ser PSer
N
H
C
H
C
O
CH2
O
P O-O
O
-
Acidic macromolecules
SYSTEM FRAMEWORK ACIDIC
Bone and dentine Collagen Glycoproteins (osteopontin, osteonectin)Proteoglycans (chondroitin sulfate)Gla-containing proteinsOsteocalcin
Tooth enamel Amelogenin Glycoproteins (enamelins)
Mollusc nacre -chitin Glycoproteins (nacrein, N66)Silk-like proteins (MSI 60)
N16/N14 Lustrin A
Crab cuticle -chitin Glycoproteins
Diatom shells Frustulins Glycoproteins (HEP200, silaffins)
Silica Sponges Silicatein ???
Plant silica Cellulose Proteins/carbohydrates
Macromolecules and organic matrix-mediated biomineralization
Matrix macromolecules in bone
collagen (90 wt%) + non-collagenous proteins and proteoglycans
synthesis of helical polypeptide chains
enzymatic modification of amino acids (proline and lysine hydroxylation)
self-assembly of triple-stranded helix filaments
secretion into the extracellular space
enzymatic removal of short peptides from filament ends
self-assembly of collagen fibrils
formation of cross-links
mature collagen fibrils
biomineralization
Biosynthesis of collagen
osteoblast
extracellular space
Collagen – type I
1000 amino acids 30 % glycine (Gly) + 20% proline (Pro) + hydroxyproline (Hyp)
[Gly-X-Y]338 triplets often as [Gly-Pro-Hyp]
Pro
Pro
Pro
Pro
Gly
Gly
A B C
steric constraints helical backbone
small Gly triple superhelix
tropocollagen
coiled-coil 3.3 residues /turn
280 nm
1.5 nm
Tropocollagen interchain interactions:
steric, H-bonding (NH-OC, OH)
covalent crosslinks involving lysines
N C C
H H O
H
N
H2C
C
H
CH2
C
O
CH2
N
H2C
C
H
CH2
C
O
C
OH
H
Tropocollagen – assembly of collagen fibrils
N
C C
C
CNN N
Revised quarter-stagger model: five overlapping zones
Mismatch due to crosslinks near C and N ends.
Hole zones: 40 x 5 nm
grooves [001]
[110]
[110]-
Top face
CollagenGrooveDirection
Side face
End face
CollagenFibrilAxis
HAP crystals aligned in hole zone/grooves
Non-collagenous proteins in bone
MACROMOLECULES MOLECULAR COMPOSITION MASS (x 103 )
Acidic glycoproteins
Osteonectin 44 (bovine) Asp/GluSialoprotein II 200 Asp[Glu]9 Phosphoprotein 40 Asp/Glu/PSerPhosphophoryns (dentine) 100 (human) [Ser-Asp]n [PSer]8
Proteoglycans (cartilage)Bone proteoglycans 350 chondroitin sulfate Cartilage proteoglycans 1,000 chondroitin/keratin sulfate
Gla proteins
Osteocalcin 6 -carboxyGlu (x3)Matrix Gla protein 15 -carboxyGlu (x5)
N
H
C
H
C
O
CH2
CCOO-OC
H-O
-Glu
OH O
H HH
OHH
CH2OH
HH O
HH
NHCOCH3H
OH
CH2OSO3-
O
O
H O
HH
OHH
OH
COO-
HOH O
H HH
NHCOCH3H
CH2OSO3-
HOO
Chondroitin 6-sulfate Keratan sulfate
Tooth enamel proteins
Ameloblast
Ca2+ HPO42-
20nmnanosphere
Amelogenin monomer
c axis
Hydroxyapatite crystal+ enamelin sheath
amelogenins
180 amino acids (hydrophobic, Pro, Leu ..)25k monomer 20 nm nanospheres (gel)
spatial control of c axis growth
Only 5 % organic macromolecules
enamelins
60k highly acidic (Asp, Glu)
sheath around HAP crystals
Matrix macromolecules from shell nacre Aragonite
Acidicmacromolecules
Silk-fibroin-likehydrophobic proteins
-chitina
b
c
- chitin; R = -NHCOMe
Antiparallel -pleated sheet
MSI 60, N16; Ala, Gly-rich
-CO, -NH hydrogen bonds
Laminated hybrid structure
nacrein[Asp-Glu-PSer]
Macromolecules from silica biomineralization
Diatoms Frustulins HEP200 Silaffins (HF-extractable)
high Mr (75k) glycoproteins [Cys-Glu-Gly-Asp-Cys-Asp] + [Gly]n
25% Ser/Thr low Mr (4 to 17k)+ 20% Asp/Glu polylysine repeats
+ oligo-N-methylpropylamino
Sponge spicules Silicatein
x3 subunits; 20% Ser/Thrcatalytic (hydrolytic) properties in vitro
N
H
C
H
C
O
CH2
CH2
CH2
CH2
N
CH2 CH2 CH2 NH+]n
C
[
H2+
H3
Organic matrix-mediated nucleation
The activation energy for nucleation is lowered by specific interfacial interactions between functional groups on the organic matrix and ions in supersaturated solution.
no organic surface
organic matrix
G
G*N(2)
G*N(1)
rr*(1)r*
(2)
– control nucleation rate and number of sites
– organization of nucleation sites on organic surface
– structural selectivity of mineral polymorphs
– crystallographic alignment of nuclei on the organic surface.
Organic matrix-mediated nucleation – structural control
1
2
2
2
22
2
11
1
1
1A A A
BB B
G I II III1 no matrix
2 matrix
A, B polymorphs
A kinetically favoured (no matrix)
Outcomes
I. promotion of non-specific nucleation - reduced activation energies for A and B, no change in the outcome of mineralization.
II. promotion of structure-specific nucleation of polymorph B - crystallographic recognition at matrix surface; activation energy of state 2B < 2A
III. promotion of a sequence of structurally non-specific to highly specific nucleation – variations in levels of recognition of nuclei A and B and reproducibility of matrix structure (genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors).
Interfacial molecular recognition
Latticegeometry
Charge Polarity Stereo-chemistry
Spacesymmetry
Topography
Inorganic nucleus
Organic matrix
Lowering of the activation energy for nucleation can arise from matching of charge, polarity, structure and stereochemistry at the interface between an inorganic nucleus and organic macromolecular surface.
The shape of the interface and the degree of chemical complementarity are important factors in this process.
Electrostatic accumulation – ionotropic model
Anionic surface ligands accumulate metal cations by electrostatic binding (ionotropy)
Site-directed ordering over nucleation scale by clustering – high spatial charge density
High capacity binding high localised supersaturation +
Low affinity binding migration of surface-bound ions to nucleus
Or, charge matching of preformed nuclei in regions of high spatial charge density
A B C
FeIII
FeII
O2
ferroxidase centre
2FeII + O2 + 4H2O 2FeOOH + H2O2 + 4H+
nucleation groove
Electrostatic accumulation – nucleation in ferritin
Surface topography
concave convex planar
concave surfaces – high spatial charge density + good nucleation sites 3-D clustering of ions
convex surfaces – dissipated charge density poor nucleation sites limit on number of nucleation sites
planar substrates – localized charge distributions 2-D nucleation sitesstructural matching
Structural matching – the geometric model
- - - - -
-
+ +
-
+ +
- - -
-
+ +
-
+ +
- - -
+ +
- -
+ +
-
+ +
- - -
+ +
-
+ +
- -
x
y
Nucleating crystal
Organic matrix
Distances between regularly spaced binding sites on the surface of the organic matrix are commensurate with lattice spacings in particular crystal faces.
x
nacre
Structural matching in nacre
Tandem repeats of [Asp-X] explain the specific nucleation of the (001) face of aragonite on the surface of anti-parallel -pleated sheet proteins in shell nacre.
XRD and electron diffraction: a and b axes of -sheet and lattice are co-aligned
good matching along a directions; less so along b directions
Stereochemical matching in nacre
Importance of side group stereochemistry coordination environments, multidentate binding, cooperativitycharge balance
0.797
0.496
0.499
0.499 120°90°
(001) face; values in nm
Calcite ( ) vs aragonite ( ) (001) faces
Similar lattice geometry but different Ca2+ and CO3
2- stereochemistry
Calcite; CN = 6, planar CO32- all coaligned
Aragonite; CN = 9, planar CO32- x2 types
stereochemistry in crystal face
Oriented nucleation on soap films
surfactanthydrophobic tail
hydrophilic headgroup
Langmuir monolayers
air
supersaturated CaHCO3(aq)
Limiting area for single alkyl chain = 0.2 nm2
Oriented nucleation of calcium carbonate under Langmuir monolayers
CH3(CH2)16COOH CH3(CH2)19OSO3H
unit cell a axis to monolayer surface c axis to monolayer surface
NO oriented nucleation under CH3(CH2)17OH Ca2+ binding required !
A
B
carboxylate monolayer
sulfated monolayer
air
supersaturated CaHCO3 (aq)
Ca2+ binding
0.5 nm
0.5 nm
0.5 nm
0.5 nm
Matching of headgroup and orientation of CO3
2- anions in nucleatedcrystal face
Ca2+ binding
Matching of headgroup distance and Ca2+ spacing in nucleated crystal face