overview of hipercap results so far - sintef · 2016. 10. 3. · project overview. wp1 absorption...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview of HiPerCap results so farMatesa seminar, Oslo, Norway 16th June, 2016
Hanne Kvamsdal (SINTEF)
Outline
Project overview
Project objectives
Technology development in the project
Technology assessment and benchmarking
2
EU project HiPerCap
• EU-Australia twinning project• Coordinator: SINTEF MC
(Dr. Hanne Kvamsdal)• Partners:
• 13 EU partners• 1 from Australia• 1 from Russia
• Duration:• 4 years, Jan 2014 - Dec 2017
• Budget:• 7.7 M€ (4.9 M€ from EU)
3
http://www.sintef.no/projectweb/hipercap/
4
Project objectives
• Develop environmentally benign energy- and cost-efficienttechnologies for post-combustion capture
• Develop a methodology for fair comparison and benchmarking of the technologies
• Develop technology roadmap for the two most promisingtechnologies
5
Key focus on potential of the capture technologies
Specific objectives• Reduction of 25% energy pentalty compared to the State-
of-the-Art
Post-Combustion capturetechnologies in HiPerCap
• Absorption• Proof-of-concept of 4 solvent concepts• Feasibility study of bio-mimicking concept
• Adsorption• Testing of various sorbents including "green" sorbents• Studying two reactor systems (fixed-bed and moving-bed)
• Membrane• Hybrid (polymer + nanoparticles) membranes• Supported ionic liquid membranes
6 Images: www.co2crc.com.au
WP4 Assessment of new and emerging technologies and processes
WP 1 Absorption
Concepts- Catalysed systems- Low temperature
regeneration
Chemicals/materials- Enzyme activators- Strong bicarbonate
formers
WP5 Roadmap for demonstration of selected technologies
WP 3 Membranes
Concepts- Module design
Materials-Mixed Matrix membranes-Ionic liquids
WP 2 Adsorption
Concepts- Monoliths- Moving bed
Materials- Sorbent
development
Project overview
WP1 ABSORPTION (LED BY TNO)
8
Enzyme catalysis of CO2 absorption (led by Procede)
• Enzymes in solvents can drastically accelerate the capture of CO2. It’s an environmentally friendly promotor.
Idea
• Testing of carbonic anhydrase and develop and test an optimized process in a pilot plant
Work in the project
• Enzyme stability throughout the process and separation of the enzymes prior to desorption due to the high temperature
Challenges for this technology
• 40 wt% DMMEA + enzymes best results so far, challenges with column heights to achieve 90% capture and some safety issues with DMMEA for testing
Results so far
WP1 ABSORPTION
9
Precipitation solvent systems (led by TNO)
• Regeneration of only the CO2 containing part of the solvent. Minimization of emission by the use of amino acids.
Idea
• Develop an process with the focus optimization of the absorber packing.
Work in the project
• Process control with solids present and the handling of large scale slurries.
Challenges for this technology
• Models for vapour-liquid-solid equilibria and several other thermodynamic properties developed based on experiments
• Preliminary flowsheet calculations shows thermal heat requirement of 2.4-2.5 GJ/ton CO2 (benchmark solvent is 2.8-2.9), 15% improvement
Results so far
WP1 ABSORPTION
10
Strong bicarbonate forming solvents (Led by NTNU)
• Bicarbonate forming solvents with high pKa will accelerate reaction kinetics and allow for lower regeneration temperature.
Idea
• Screening activity to find promising candidates for detailed studies.
Work in the project
• There are many candidates. Low absorption rates might require a promotor (investigate connection with the enzyme task)
Challenges for this technology
• Two solvents identified, extra tests with a promoter shows promising results energetically• The best one has some stability and environmental issues
Results so far
WP1 ABSORPTION
11
Integration of CO2 absorption with utilization (by algae) (Led by TNO)
• Use algae to “eat” the CO2 from the solvent loaded by the flue gas. Create biomass as a product.
Idea
• Process development (algae strain, solvent, operation conditions). Test proof of concept with real flue gas.
Work in the project
• Solvent selection, optimize process conditions, resistance against impurities in flue gas.
Challenges for this technology
• Concept developed and experimentally proven• Process model is developed for scale-up studies
Results so far
Algae Bioreactor
Algae Biomass
Nutrients
Light
Down stream processing
Biomass
C o n c e p t
Products
Abso
rber
Makeup water
CO2-lean gas
CO2-rich gas
Rich solvent
Bottom Tray
Top Tray
Lean solvent
WP1 ABSORPTION
12
Study of bio-mimicking systems ( Led by SINTEF)
• Perform a fundamental study of CO2 binding mechanism in nature an determine processes for the utilization industry.
Idea
• Review and assessment of potential candidates. Perform screening experiments.
Work in the project
• Define some possible systems.
Goal
• 2 zinc complexes (bio-mimicking catalysts) synthesized and tested• Increase in absorption rate (MDEA reference), but small compared to carbonic anhydrase
(biocatalyst)
Results so far
WP2 ADSORPTION (LED BY CSIC)
13
Sorbent development ( Led by CSIC)
• Development of low temperature solid sorbents, low cost and with a high surface area. Integrate them in a process.
Idea
• Production and characterization of possible candidates.
Work in the project
• Identification of materials suitable for the targeted process environment.
Challenges
• Low-temperature carbon-based solid sorbents (both particulates and structured) developed, characterized and tested
• Targeted adsorption capacities reached, experimental facilities and materials have been set up, characterization tests completed
• Exchange of two samples between CSIRO and CSIC
Results so far
MAST Carbon monolith
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Amou
nt o
f CO
2ad
sorb
ed (m
mol
g-1
)
Pressure (kPa)
0 ˚C30 ˚C50 ˚C70 ˚CToth
CO2 isotherms on MAST’s monolith
WP2 ADSORPTION (LED BY CSIC)
14
Process development ( Led by CSIC)
• Develop temperature swing adsorption processes by means of fixed and circulating moving beds
Idea
• Tests in labs relevant for fixed bed and circulating bed conditions, but with real flue gas conditions at coal and NG fired power stations
• Tests in pilots with real flue gas from coal power station (TNO Maasvlakte pilot)
Work in the project
• Develop correlations describing kinetics and equilibrium relations for multi-component systems.
Challenges
• Breakthrough experiments in a lab-scale fixed bed unit with synthetic humid flue gas on carbon monoliths• Process development based on simulation of fixed-bed cyclic process using Aspen Adsorption model
parameters based on lab experiments • Unit models for the different sections of the moving bed unit are being developed and implemented in
gPROMS
Results so far
CO2 H2 N2
SCADA system
Extractor hood
Column
Activated carbon
Mix
er
Thermocouple
Back pressure regulator (BPR)
Micro-GCM
T
TC
P
Heating coil
PC
He
Gas feeding system Adsorption column Gas analysis
Fixed-bed experimental set-up
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.12
0.15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
y CO
2
Time (min)
RN1AD2215SEP31
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0 300 600 900 1200
y H2O
Time (min)
RN1AD2215SEP31
Breakthrough curves: RN1 (granular-biomass), AD2 (monolith-biomass) and 215sep31 (monolith-resin)
WP2 ADSORPTION (LED BY CSIC)
15
Process modeling ( Led by SINTEF)
• Develop process concepts for a full scale adsorption plant including the thermo-process integration with the power-plant
Idea
• Simulations to determine optimal design for integration with the power-plant
Work in the project
• High uncertainty level in the models as data from relevant pilot plant are very limited .
Challenges
• A two-stage approach for the fixed-bed is established in order to meet the recovery (85%) and purity specifications (95% dry basis) for the CO2
Results so far
MBTSA process
WP3 MEMBRANES (LED BY NTNU)
16
Hybrid and supported ionic liquid membrane development
• Investigate high flux mixed matrix membrane with incorporated nanoparticles in a polymer. • Develop supported ionic liquid membranes
Idea
• For the hybrid membranes: realization of the membranes and study the transport phenomena. For the ionic liquid membranes: development, preparation and performance testing. Perform modeling work.
Work in the project
• Performance. Large scale manufacturing and durability
Challenges
• Hybrid membranes: Two types prepared, but targeted performance was not reached. SO2 tests promising regarding durability.
• Ionic Liquids NTNU: 3 ionic-liquids + polymer chosen, so far high permeance, but low selectivity. Will test and optimize with a new polymer
• Ionic Liquids TIPS: Improved performance by inclusion of a selective layer support, targeted values almost reached for the performance, will optimize further
• Model developed for the hybrid membrane and a two stage process model is develop using Aspen Plus
Results so far
WP4 BENCHMARKING (LED BY DNVGL)
17
Develop and apply an assessment methodology for emerging technologies on different TRL-level
• Develop a KPI based methodology with a consistent way of scaling up to a representative scale of application.
Idea
• Define a clear base case, use defined system boundaries, modeling approach and comparison criteria. Select the two most promising technologies.
Work in the project
• Develop a fair methodology for comparison of immature and technologies at different TRL levels.
Challenges
• Methodology developed based on two stage selection process• Reference case established and the integrated process simulated• Starting collecting available data especially from WP1
Results so far
WP5 ROADMAP DEVELOPMENT (LED BY UNIPER, FORMER E.ON)
• Develop a technological roadmap for the industrial demonstration of two chosen technologies. Furthermore, we also aim to identify any gaps in knowledge required for implementing the technologies at industrial pilot units.
• A plan will be made for demonstrating the technology at an industrial pilot plant.
• Depending on the specific technology to be further studied, additional activities such as experimental lab activities for improved models and further process optimization are foreseen in order to reduce the uncertainty in the performance data prior to the final benchmarking.
18
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
19
Thanks to co-authors:Inna Kim1, Peter van Os2, Covadonga Pevida3, May-Britt Hägg4, Jock Brown5, Robin Irons6, and Paul Feron7
1. SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Norway2. TNO, Netherlands3. CSIC, Spain4. NTNU, Norway5. DNVGL Oil and Gas, Norway6. UNIPER, U.K.7. CSIRO, Australia
This work is performed within the HiPerCap project. The project receives funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 608555. The industrial partners who also financially support the project are also gratefully acknowledged.
Thank you for the attention!