overview of the ceqa process calafco staff workshop april 15, 2010 fernando avila...

80
Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila @bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best & Krieger, LLP 3750 University Ave., Ste. 400 Riverside, CA 92502 Fax: (951) 686-3083

Upload: cuthbert-rogers

Post on 11-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Overview Of The CEQA Process

CALAFCO Staff WorkshopApril 15, 2010

Fernando [email protected]

(213) 787-2549 (Direct)Best Best & Krieger, LLP

3750 University Ave., Ste. 400Riverside, CA 92502Fax: (951) 686-3083

Page 2: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

A little history . . .A little history . . .

The California Environmental Quality Act The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") was adopted in 1970 and signed into ("CEQA") was adopted in 1970 and signed into law by Governor Reagan.law by Governor Reagan.

Regarded as the foundation of environmental law Regarded as the foundation of environmental law and policy in California.and policy in California.

Modeled after the National Environmental Policy Modeled after the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA"). The Federal Act was adopted in Act ("NEPA"). The Federal Act was adopted in 1969 and signed into law by President Nixon. 1969 and signed into law by President Nixon. CEQA has become more restrictive than NEPA, CEQA has become more restrictive than NEPA, which is more procedural than substantive.which is more procedural than substantive.

Page 3: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

There are Four “Parts” to There are Four “Parts” to CEQA: CEQA:

1.1. The StatuteThe Statute: located at Public Resources : located at Public Resources Code section 21000 Code section 21000 et seqet seq. .

2.2. State CEQA GuidelinesState CEQA Guidelines: located at 14 : located at 14 California Code of Regulations section California Code of Regulations section 15000 15000 etet seqseq. The State Guidelines are . The State Guidelines are prepared by the State Resources Agency prepared by the State Resources Agency to implement CEQA and reflect case law. to implement CEQA and reflect case law.

3.3. Local CEQA GuidelinesLocal CEQA Guidelines: Public Agencies : Public Agencies are required to adopt their own local are required to adopt their own local CEQA guidelines or to adopt the State CEQA guidelines or to adopt the State CEQA Guidelines.CEQA Guidelines.

4.4. Case Law.Case Law. CEQA is constantly interpreted CEQA is constantly interpreted by the Courts. by the Courts.

Page 4: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Objectives of CEQAObjectives of CEQA(State CEQA Guidelines § (State CEQA Guidelines §

15002) 15002) Disclose Significant EffectsDisclose Significant Effects Disclose ReasoningDisclose Reasoning Identify Alternatives and MitigationIdentify Alternatives and Mitigation Implement Alternatives & Implement Alternatives &

MitigationMitigation Foster Agency CoordinationFoster Agency Coordination Enhance Public Participation in the Enhance Public Participation in the

Planning ProcessPlanning Process

Page 5: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

The PlayersThe Players

Page 6: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

The Lead AgencyThe Lead Agency Public agency with principal responsibility of Public agency with principal responsibility of

carrying out or approving a project.carrying out or approving a project. Decides what CEQA document to prepare.Decides what CEQA document to prepare. First, a public agency is the lead agency for its own First, a public agency is the lead agency for its own

projects, even if within another agency’s projects, even if within another agency’s jurisdiction. (Examples: City to build sewage jurisdiction. (Examples: City to build sewage treatment plant or school district to build new high treatment plant or school district to build new high school.)school.)

Second, for private projects, the agency with Second, for private projects, the agency with general governmental powers is the lead agency. general governmental powers is the lead agency. (Example: developer wishes to build 5,000 houses (Example: developer wishes to build 5,000 houses and needs land use approvals from City.)and needs land use approvals from City.)

Lastly, if all else is equal, it is the agency that acts Lastly, if all else is equal, it is the agency that acts first.first.

Agency squabbles can be resolved by the OPR.Agency squabbles can be resolved by the OPR.

Page 7: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Responsible AgenciesResponsible Agencies

A public agency that has some discretionary A public agency that has some discretionary approval or permitting power over the project. approval or permitting power over the project. Usually much narrower authority, such as Usually much narrower authority, such as California Department of Fish & Game or the California Department of Fish & Game or the Regional Water Quality Control Boards. Regional Water Quality Control Boards.

Supposed to actively participate in the CEQA Supposed to actively participate in the CEQA process.process.

Must rely on lead agency’s CEQA document but Must rely on lead agency’s CEQA document but issues its own findings regarding the project.issues its own findings regarding the project.

Must also impose all feasible mitigation Must also impose all feasible mitigation measures.measures.

Page 8: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

LAFCOs: Lead or LAFCOs: Lead or Responsible Agencies?Responsible Agencies?

LAFCOs seem to usually act as responsible LAFCOs seem to usually act as responsible agencies,agencies, because 1) they don’t have general because 1) they don’t have general governmental powers (rather, they are single-governmental powers (rather, they are single-purpose agencies) and 2) they often don’t act purpose agencies) and 2) they often don’t act first.first.

Prezoning: CEQA Guidelines state that the city Prezoning: CEQA Guidelines state that the city doing the prezoning is the lead agency. doing the prezoning is the lead agency. (15051b2)(15051b2)

Landowner-initiated boundary change petitions: Landowner-initiated boundary change petitions: LAFCO is lead agency. (LAFCO is lead agency. (People ex rel Younger v. People ex rel Younger v. LAFCO LAFCO (1978) 81 Cal.App.3d 464.)(1978) 81 Cal.App.3d 464.) However, this would change if the petition is part of a However, this would change if the petition is part of a

larger project for which traditional land use approvals larger project for which traditional land use approvals are sought from an agency with general government are sought from an agency with general government powers.powers.

Page 9: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Real Party in InterestReal Party in Interest

For private projects, the project For private projects, the project developer is the real party in developer is the real party in interest.interest.

General financial responsibility for General financial responsibility for project.project.

Usually indemnifies the lead agency.Usually indemnifies the lead agency.

Page 10: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

The PublicThe Public Public participation is an essential Public participation is an essential

feature of CEQA, with members of the feature of CEQA, with members of the public holding a "privileged position" in public holding a "privileged position" in the CEQA process.the CEQA process.

CEQA allows numerous opportunities for CEQA allows numerous opportunities for the public to review and comment on the public to review and comment on CEQA documents.CEQA documents.

Also contains a citizen enforcement Also contains a citizen enforcement provision allowing the public and other provision allowing the public and other agencies to file lawsuits to ensure agencies to file lawsuits to ensure compliance with the law.compliance with the law.

Page 11: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSIMPACTS

A Substantive QuestionA Substantive Question

Page 12: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

What constitutes an What constitutes an environmental impact?environmental impact?

Substantial or potentially substantial adverse Substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the physical environment. Includes change in the physical environment. Includes both direct impacts (i.e., occurring at the same both direct impacts (i.e., occurring at the same time/place as the project) time/place as the project) andand reasonably reasonably foreseeable indirect impacts (i.e., occurring foreseeable indirect impacts (i.e., occurring some distance or at a later time but are still some distance or at a later time but are still foreseeable). (foreseeable). (State CEQA Guidelines State CEQA Guidelines § § 1535815358.).)

Must impact the “physical environment” (ex.: Must impact the “physical environment” (ex.: issuance of permit to remodel the issuance of permit to remodel the interiorinterior of a of a home in a historic neighborhood did not impact home in a historic neighborhood did not impact the physical environment).the physical environment).

Page 13: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Identifying Significant Impacts Identifying Significant Impacts on the Environmenton the Environment

Additionally, a lead agency may find Additionally, a lead agency may find that a project has a significant that a project has a significant environmental impact based on:environmental impact based on: Model Initial Study ChecklistModel Initial Study Checklist CEQA’s Mandatory Findings of SignificanceCEQA’s Mandatory Findings of Significance Agency Adopted Regulatory StandardsAgency Adopted Regulatory Standards Consultation with Other AgenciesConsultation with Other Agencies Agency Thresholds of Significance (CEQA Agency Thresholds of Significance (CEQA

encourages public agencies to adopt encourages public agencies to adopt thresholds of significance for whole thresholds of significance for whole jurisdiction)jurisdiction)

Expert testimony (battle of the experts)Expert testimony (battle of the experts)

Page 14: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

CEQA’s Three CEQA’s Three Part ProcessPart Process

Page 15: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Three QuestionsThree Questions

Is it a Project?Is it a Project? Is it Exempt?Is it Exempt? What Level of Review is Required?What Level of Review is Required?

Page 16: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Do you have a Do you have a “Project?”“Project?”The First QuestionThe First Question

Page 17: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Project Project (Public Resources (Public Resources Code § 21065)Code § 21065)

The whole of an action, which has the potential for The whole of an action, which has the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and that is any physical change in the environment, and that is any of the following:of the following:1.1. Direct Public Agency ActionDirect Public Agency Action such as such as construction activities and adoption/amendment of construction activities and adoption/amendment of general plans;general plans;2.2. Agency Supported ActionAgency Supported Action through public through public contracts, loans, grants, etc.contracts, loans, grants, etc.3.3. Agency Approved ActionAgency Approved Action such as issuance of such as issuance of lease, permit, license or other entitlement for use by lease, permit, license or other entitlement for use by a public agency. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15378.) a public agency. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15378.)

Page 18: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

A Project is a A Project is a Discretionary ActDiscretionary Act

Generally requires an exercise of Generally requires an exercise of judgment or deliberation, as judgment or deliberation, as opposed to a ministerial action. opposed to a ministerial action. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15357.) (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15357.)

Discretionary actions would include Discretionary actions would include approvals of general plans or approvals of general plans or conditional use permits. Ministerial conditional use permits. Ministerial actions are exempt from CEQA. actions are exempt from CEQA. (State CEQA Guidelines, 15268.)(State CEQA Guidelines, 15268.)

Page 19: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

No Discretion = Not a No Discretion = Not a ProjectProject

Drilling a well in backyard in most areas Drilling a well in backyard in most areas (unless discretionary approval is needed).(unless discretionary approval is needed).

The following actions are presumed to be The following actions are presumed to be ministerial and therefore exempt from ministerial and therefore exempt from CEQA:CEQA:1.1. Issuance of building permits; Issuance of building permits; 2.2. Issuance of business licenses;Issuance of business licenses;3.3. Approval of final subdivision maps;Approval of final subdivision maps;4.4. Approvals of individual utility service Approvals of individual utility service connections and disconnections.connections and disconnections.

Page 20: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Non-ProjectsNon-Projects Proposals for legislation to be enacted by the State Proposals for legislation to be enacted by the State

Legislature.Legislature. Certain continuing administrative or maintenance Certain continuing administrative or maintenance

activities, such as purchasing supplies.activities, such as purchasing supplies. Submissions of proposals to a statewide or local Submissions of proposals to a statewide or local

vote.vote. Creation of government funding mechanisms or Creation of government funding mechanisms or

other government fiscal activities that do not other government fiscal activities that do not involve commitment to specific projects that may involve commitment to specific projects that may result in physical environmental impacts.result in physical environmental impacts.

Organizational or administrative activities of Organizational or administrative activities of governments.governments.

(State CEQA Guidelines section 15378)(State CEQA Guidelines section 15378)

Page 21: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Examples of LAFCO Examples of LAFCO ActionsActions

That are “Projects”That are “Projects” An annexation. (An annexation. (Bozung v. LAFCOBozung v. LAFCO

(1975) 13 Cal.3d 263.)(1975) 13 Cal.3d 263.) A deannexation. (A deannexation. (People ex rel Younger People ex rel Younger

v. LAFCOv. LAFCO (1978) 81 Cal.3d 464.) (1978) 81 Cal.3d 464.) New LAFCO sphere of influence New LAFCO sphere of influence

guidelines. (guidelines. (City of Livermore v. City of Livermore v. LAFCOLAFCO (1986) 184 Cal.App.3d 531.) (1986) 184 Cal.App.3d 531.)

Page 22: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Examples of LAFCO ActionsExamples of LAFCO Actions(cont’d.)(cont’d.)

That are not “Projects”That are not “Projects” Detachment. (Detachment. (Simi Valley Recreation & Simi Valley Recreation &

Park Dist. v. LAFCO Park Dist. v. LAFCO (1975) 51 (1975) 51 Cal.App.3d 648.)Cal.App.3d 648.)

Adoption of sphere of influence. (Adoption of sphere of influence. (City City of Agoura Hills v. LAFCOof Agoura Hills v. LAFCO (1988) 198 (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 480.)Cal.App.3d 480.)

Page 23: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Caveat!Caveat! There’s no bright line rule that a specific action There’s no bright line rule that a specific action

is always or never a “project” under CEQA.is always or never a “project” under CEQA. Note that in the cases just cited, an annexation and Note that in the cases just cited, an annexation and

adoption of SOI guidelines were subject to CEQA, adoption of SOI guidelines were subject to CEQA, whereas the adoption of an actual SOI was not.whereas the adoption of an actual SOI was not.

It’s a highly fact-specific, case-by-case inquiry.It’s a highly fact-specific, case-by-case inquiry. Whether “the whole of the action would have a Whether “the whole of the action would have a

potential to result in a direct physical change in potential to result in a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment” is indirect physical change in the environment” is our lodestar.our lodestar.

Page 24: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Breaking it Down Breaking it Down FurtherFurther

In looking at whether our lodestar In looking at whether our lodestar question is fulfilled, need to consider question is fulfilled, need to consider the “whole of the action.”the “whole of the action.” The entire underlying activity of which The entire underlying activity of which

an approval is a part, and not each an approval is a part, and not each approval viewed separately.approval viewed separately.

Page 25: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Breaking it Down Breaking it Down FurtherFurther

What is a “reasonably foreseeable indirect What is a “reasonably foreseeable indirect effect”?effect”? If the agency’s action is a necessary step that starts in If the agency’s action is a necessary step that starts in

motion a chain of events that will foreseeably result in motion a chain of events that will foreseeably result in impacts on the physical environment, the action is impacts on the physical environment, the action is subject to CEQA.subject to CEQA.

However, if the action only establishes the ability of However, if the action only establishes the ability of an agency to take further future action, but does not an agency to take further future action, but does not commit that agency to take that course, that further commit that agency to take that course, that further action and its impacts are not part of the same action and its impacts are not part of the same “project” as the original action.“project” as the original action.

This can be subjective, and inconsistent case law This can be subjective, and inconsistent case law exists applying these tests.exists applying these tests.

Page 26: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

EXEMPTIONSEXEMPTIONS

The Second Question:The Second Question:

If it is a Project, is it exempt?If it is a Project, is it exempt?

Page 27: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Statutory Exemptions Statutory Exemptions (State CEQA Guidelines § (State CEQA Guidelines §

15260 15260 etet seq.seq.) ) These exemptions are enacted by These exemptions are enacted by

the Legislators. As such, even if the the Legislators. As such, even if the actions may have environmental actions may have environmental impacts, the exemption is impacts, the exemption is mandatory. mandatory. Many of the statutory Many of the statutory exemptions are listed in the State exemptions are listed in the State CEQA Guidelines section 15260 CEQA Guidelines section 15260 etet seqseq. They are also located in other . They are also located in other codes.codes.

Page 28: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Examples of Statutory Examples of Statutory Exemptions: Exemptions:

Ministerial Projects;Ministerial Projects; Preparation of UWMP; Preparation of UWMP; Emergency Projects; andEmergency Projects; and Feasibility or Planning Studies for Feasibility or Planning Studies for

possible future action.possible future action.

Page 29: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Categorical Exemptions Categorical Exemptions

Categorical exemptions are Categorical exemptions are found in the State CEQA found in the State CEQA Guidelines section 15301 Guidelines section 15301 etet seqseq. . Developed by the Resources Developed by the Resources Agency as classes of projects that Agency as classes of projects that will not have a significant effect will not have a significant effect on the environment. on the environment.

Page 30: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Examples of Categorical Examples of Categorical Exemptions:Exemptions:

Replacement or Reconstruction of Replacement or Reconstruction of Facilities;Facilities;

Changes in organization of local Changes in organization of local agencies;agencies;

Installation of small new equipment; Installation of small new equipment; andand

Actions by regulatory agencies to Actions by regulatory agencies to protect the environmentprotect the environment

Page 31: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Two LAFCO Categorical Two LAFCO Categorical ExemptionsExemptions

Section 15320. Governmental Section 15320. Governmental reorganizations are exempt if they reorganizations are exempt if they do not change the area in which do not change the area in which previously existing powers were previously existing powers were exercised, including establishment exercised, including establishment of a subsidiary district, consolidation of a subsidiary district, consolidation of two districts, or merger of a of two districts, or merger of a district within a city into that city.district within a city into that city.

Page 32: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Two LAFCO Categorical Two LAFCO Categorical ExemptionsExemptions

(cont’d.)(cont’d.) Section 15319. Section 15319.

Subsection (a): Annexations of areas Subsection (a): Annexations of areas containing structures developed to the containing structures developed to the density allowed by current zoning are density allowed by current zoning are exempt as long as any utility services are exempt as long as any utility services are designed to serve only the existing designed to serve only the existing development.development.

Subsection (b): Annexation of individual Subsection (b): Annexation of individual small parcels for construction of minimum-small parcels for construction of minimum-size facilities that are exempt from CEQA size facilities that are exempt from CEQA under Section 15303.under Section 15303.

Page 33: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Point of Distinction: Point of Distinction: Statutory vs. Categorical Statutory vs. Categorical

ExemptionsExemptions Although Statutory Exemptions are Although Statutory Exemptions are

Mandatory, Categorical Exemptions Mandatory, Categorical Exemptions are NOT and Will Not Apply In are NOT and Will Not Apply In Certain Circumstances Certain Circumstances Historical resourcesHistorical resources Endangered SpeciesEndangered Species Environmentally Sensitive and UniqueEnvironmentally Sensitive and Unique

Page 34: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

The "Catchall" The "Catchall" Exemption Exemption

““Where it can be seen with certainty that Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on question may have a significant effect on the environment.” (Section 15061, subd. the environment.” (Section 15061, subd. (b)(3).) (b)(3).)

Cautionary note: This is hard to defend Cautionary note: This is hard to defend in court because the burden is on the in court because the burden is on the lead agency to prove the exemption lead agency to prove the exemption applies, and not on the petitioner to applies, and not on the petitioner to prove that it does not. prove that it does not.

Page 35: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Notice of ExemptionNotice of Exemption

Filed with the County Clerk or Clerk of Filed with the County Clerk or Clerk of the Board of Supervisors the Board of Supervisors followingfollowing Agency approval of the project. Starts Agency approval of the project. Starts 35‑day statute of limitations period for 35‑day statute of limitations period for legal challenges ‑ if not filed and posted legal challenges ‑ if not filed and posted by the County, the statute of limitations by the County, the statute of limitations is is 180 days180 days. (Guidelines § 15026(d)). (Guidelines § 15026(d))

Generally, the filing of a Notice of Generally, the filing of a Notice of Exemption is not required.Exemption is not required.

Any staff member can fill it out.Any staff member can fill it out.

Page 36: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

or

County Clerk

County of:

FROM:

1. Project Title:

2. Project Location – Identify street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map identified by quadrangle name):

3. (a) Project Location – City:

(b) Project Location – County:

4. Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of Project:

5. Name of Public Agency approving project:

6. Name of Person or Agency carrying out project:

7. Exempt status: (check one)

(a) Ministerial project.

(b) Not a project.

(c) Emergency Project.

(d) Categorical Exemption.

State type and class number:

(e) Declared Emergency.

(f) Statutory Exemption.

State Code section number:

(g) Other. Explanation:

8. Reason why project was exempt:

9. Contact Person:

Telephone:

10. Attach Preliminary Exemption Assessment (Form “A”) before filing.

Date Received for Filing: Signature (Lead Agency Representative)

(Clerk Stamp Here) Title

Page 37: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

INITIAL STUDYINITIAL STUDY

The Third QuestionThe Third Question

If it is a Project, and it’s not If it is a Project, and it’s not exempt, what is required?exempt, what is required?

Page 38: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Purpose of the Initial StudyPurpose of the Initial Study(State CEQA Guidelines § (State CEQA Guidelines §

15063(a))15063(a)) Allows the lead agency to determine Allows the lead agency to determine

whether to prepare a Negative whether to prepare a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Addendum or EIRDeclaration, Addendum or EIR

Helps the lead agency refine the issues Helps the lead agency refine the issues that need to be discussed in an EIRthat need to be discussed in an EIR

An Initial Study is not required if the An Initial Study is not required if the Lead Agency elects to prepare an EIRLead Agency elects to prepare an EIR

Page 39: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Form of Initial StudyForm of Initial Study

Checklist with explanatory answers is Checklist with explanatory answers is okay. Appendix G of the State CEQA okay. Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines can be used. Guidelines can be used.

Local CEQA Guidelines.Local CEQA Guidelines. No "naked" checklist allowed. No "naked" checklist allowed. Incorporation of other reports Incorporation of other reports

permitted. permitted. Can be prepared by staff or a Can be prepared by staff or a

consultant.consultant.

Page 40: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM

1. Project Title:

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

4. Project Location:

5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:

6. General Plan Designation: 7. Zoning:

8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.)

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.)

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement):

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality

Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils

Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning

Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing

Public Services Recreation Transportation / Traffic

Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance

Page 41: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency):

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature

Date

Printed Name

For

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:

1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).

2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.

3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross -referenced).

Page 42: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

I. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:

a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?

b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?

c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?

II. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:

a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?

b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?

c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?

d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?

Page 43: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

ConsultationConsultation

Other agencies Other agencies Project applicantProject applicant Consultants and ExpertsConsultants and Experts PublicPublic

Page 44: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Initial StudyInitial Study

Timing: Generally 30 days for a Timing: Generally 30 days for a private projectprivate project

Notice: No notice requirement for IS Notice: No notice requirement for IS (***however, must provide notice for (***however, must provide notice for ND, MND or EIR.) ND, MND or EIR.)

Funding: Can charge applicant a Funding: Can charge applicant a “reasonable fee” for estimated cost “reasonable fee” for estimated cost of preparing an initial studyof preparing an initial study

Page 45: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Types of CEQA Types of CEQA DocumentsDocuments

Negative DeclarationNegative Declaration Mitigated Negative DeclarationMitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Impact ReportEnvironmental Impact Report

Page 46: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

(State CEQA Guidelines §§ (State CEQA Guidelines §§ 15063(b)(2), 15070)15063(b)(2), 15070)))

A negative declaration is appropriate if the initial study A negative declaration is appropriate if the initial study concludes that there is no substantial evidence, or concludes that there is no substantial evidence, or reasonable inference there from, that the project may reasonable inference there from, that the project may have significant adverse environmental impacts.have significant adverse environmental impacts.

The Negative Declaration form can be prepared by The Negative Declaration form can be prepared by staff, but only the decisionmaking body or person can staff, but only the decisionmaking body or person can adopt it. Staff can file the adopted Negative adopt it. Staff can file the adopted Negative Declaration.Declaration.

NEGATIVE NEGATIVE DECLARATIONDECLARATION

Page 47: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Public ReviewPublic Review(State CEQA Guidelines § (State CEQA Guidelines §

15073)15073) Typically 20 days. Typically 20 days. 30 days if the project is of statewide, 30 days if the project is of statewide,

regional or area wide significance. regional or area wide significance. 30 days if State agency review is 30 days if State agency review is

required. (See State CEQA required. (See State CEQA Guidelines section 15206.)Guidelines section 15206.)

Page 48: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Consideration and AdoptionConsideration and Adoption(State CEQA Guidelines § (State CEQA Guidelines §

15074)15074) The lead agency considers the negative The lead agency considers the negative

declaration at a noticed public meeting. declaration at a noticed public meeting. Responses to any comments received not Responses to any comments received not required but should be done anyway if required but should be done anyway if controversial project. controversial project.

Standard for Adoption ‑ If the decision making Standard for Adoption ‑ If the decision making body determines in light of the whole record body determines in light of the whole record that the project that the project will notwill not have a significant effect have a significant effect on the environment, it adopts the Negative on the environment, it adopts the Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration. If Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration. If the project "the project "MAYMAY" have a significant effect, then " have a significant effect, then an EIR is required. an EIR is required.

Page 49: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Approval of ProjectApproval of Project

Only Only afterafter adoption of Negative Declaration. adoption of Negative Declaration. Then, file a Notice of Determination (NOD) Then, file a Notice of Determination (NOD)

within five business days in order to start the within five business days in order to start the statute of limitations.statute of limitations.

Staff may prepare, execute and file the NOD.Staff may prepare, execute and file the NOD.

Page 50: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION

TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

or

County Clerk

County of:

Address:

FROM: City of:

Address:

Contact:

Phone:

TO: Office of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3044 (U.S. Mail) Sacramento, California 95812-3044

1400 Tenth Street, Room 222 (overnight delivery) Sacramento, California 95814

SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.

Project Title:

State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to SCH):

Contact Person:

Telephone Number:

Specific Project Location – Identify street address and cross street or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 ½’ topographical map identified by quadrangle name):

General Project Location (City and/or County):

Project Description:

This is to advise that the ( Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) approved the above described project on: and made the following determinations:

1. The project will have a significant effect on the environment.

The project will NOT have a significant effect on the environment

2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.

A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.

A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.

3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project.

Mitigation measures were NOT made a condition of the approval of the project.

Page 51: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

A mitigated negative declaration is A mitigated negative declaration is appropriate if there is substantial appropriate if there is substantial evidence that significant impacts evidence that significant impacts might occur, but the project can might occur, but the project can be modified to eliminate all of the be modified to eliminate all of the significant impacts or reduce them significant impacts or reduce them to below a level of significance.to below a level of significance.

MITIGATED NEGATIVE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONDECLARATION

Page 52: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Mitigation MeasuresMitigation Measures

Consider economic, environmental, Consider economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological legal, social, and technological factorsfactors

Mitigation measures must be Mitigation measures must be fully enforceablefully enforceable

"Takings" clause is a constraint – "Takings" clause is a constraint – nexus and rough proportionality nexus and rough proportionality

Page 53: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Approval of ProjectApproval of Project Only Only afterafter adoption of Negative adoption of Negative

Declaration.Declaration. Distinct from approval of Project involving Distinct from approval of Project involving

negative declaration, approval of Project negative declaration, approval of Project for which MND is prepared must include for which MND is prepared must include adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting PlanReporting Plan Specify what the mitigation isSpecify what the mitigation is Must be enforceable (shall/must/will not Must be enforceable (shall/must/will not

should/may/might)should/may/might) Specify when mitigation will take place and Specify when mitigation will take place and

who will verifywho will verify

Page 54: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Standard of PreparationStandard of Preparation

Rather low threshold ‑ there is a presumption Rather low threshold ‑ there is a presumption in CEQA in favor of preparing EIR’s.in CEQA in favor of preparing EIR’s.

Standard ‑ If there is Standard ‑ If there is any substantial any substantial evidenceevidence to support a fair argument that the to support a fair argument that the project project maymay have have significantsignificant environmental environmental impacts. impacts.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTSREPORTS

Page 55: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Types of EIRsTypes of EIRs Project EIR. Project EIR. Most common type of EIR, analyzes impacts of Most common type of EIR, analyzes impacts of

an individual activity or specific project.an individual activity or specific project. Program EIR.Program EIR. First tier document for an agency program or First tier document for an agency program or

series of actions that can be characterized as one large series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Subsequent activities are evaluated in comparison project. Subsequent activities are evaluated in comparison with the project to see if additional CEQA documents must be with the project to see if additional CEQA documents must be prepared.prepared.

Master EIR.Master EIR. Type of first tier document prepared for certain Type of first tier document prepared for certain types of actions. Intended to streamline the process, but types of actions. Intended to streamline the process, but "expires" after 5 years. "expires" after 5 years.

Focused EIR.Focused EIR. EIR for a subsequent project identified in a EIR for a subsequent project identified in a Master EIR.Master EIR.

Staged EIR.Staged EIR. Similar to a program EIR but contemplates Similar to a program EIR but contemplates additional EIRs to supplement the first.additional EIRs to supplement the first.

Tiered EIR.Tiered EIR. Separate but related projects. Later tiers move Separate but related projects. Later tiers move from general to specific analysis of projects. from general to specific analysis of projects.

Page 56: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Additional Types of EIRsAdditional Types of EIRs Subsequent/Supplemental EIR.:Subsequent/Supplemental EIR.: Need contain only Need contain only

the information necessary to make the previous EIR the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate. Given the same notice and public review as is adequate. Given the same notice and public review as is given to a draft EIR under Section 15087. given to a draft EIR under Section 15087. Supplemental EIRs may be circulated without re-Supplemental EIRs may be circulated without re-circulating the previous draft or final EIR.circulating the previous draft or final EIR.

Addendum: The Lead or Responsible Agency should Addendum: The Lead or Responsible Agency should prepare an addendum if only “minor technical changes” prepare an addendum if only “minor technical changes” or additions are necessary to make the document or additions are necessary to make the document adequate, and the changes made by the addendum do adequate, and the changes made by the addendum do not raise important new issues about the significant not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment. Need not be circulated for effects on the environment. Need not be circulated for public review. However, the decision-making body must public review. However, the decision-making body must consider the addendum with the final EIR or Negative consider the addendum with the final EIR or Negative Declaration prior to making a decision on the project.Declaration prior to making a decision on the project.

Page 57: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Requirements for Requirements for Discussing Mitigation Discussing Mitigation

Measures in EIRsMeasures in EIRs For each potentially significant impact, the lead For each potentially significant impact, the lead

agency must:agency must: Discuss whether the measure avoids or substantially Discuss whether the measure avoids or substantially

reduces significant environmental effectreduces significant environmental effect Distinguish measures proposed by project proponentsDistinguish measures proposed by project proponents Identify responsibility for implementationIdentify responsibility for implementation Discuss basis for selecting particular measureDiscuss basis for selecting particular measure Discuss significant side effect associated with Discuss significant side effect associated with

implementation of each mitigation measureimplementation of each mitigation measure

MITIGATIONMITIGATION

Page 58: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Purpose of an EIRPurpose of an EIR

Informational.Informational.

Demonstrational.Demonstrational.

Accountability. Accountability.

Page 59: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Who May Prepare an Who May Prepare an EIR?EIR?

Lead Agency staff.Lead Agency staff. Other public or private entity.Other public or private entity. Project applicant or its consultantProject applicant or its consultant Third party consultant. Third party consultant. Note - Before using a draft prepared by Note - Before using a draft prepared by

another person, the Lead Agency must another person, the Lead Agency must subject the draft to the agency's own review subject the draft to the agency's own review and analysis. The draft EIR which is sent out and analysis. The draft EIR which is sent out for public review must reflect the for public review must reflect the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. independent judgment of the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency is responsible for the The Lead Agency is responsible for the adequacy and objectivity of the draft EIR. adequacy and objectivity of the draft EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines section 15084.)(State CEQA Guidelines section 15084.)

Page 60: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Lead Agency Lead Agency ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities

Review & Analysis ‑ Must exercise Review & Analysis ‑ Must exercise its Independent Judgment.its Independent Judgment.

Consultant contract execution ‑ Consultant contract execution ‑ within 45 days of decision to prepare within 45 days of decision to prepare an EIR. an EIR.

Must make findings before approval Must make findings before approval of Projectof Project

Page 61: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Responsible Agency Responsible Agency ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities

Agency with some discretionary approval Agency with some discretionary approval authorityauthority

Must actively participate in the Lead Must actively participate in the Lead Agency’s CEQA process, review the CEQA Agency’s CEQA process, review the CEQA documents and use the document when documents and use the document when making a decision on the projectmaking a decision on the project

Must prepare own findings and file an NOD. Must prepare own findings and file an NOD. Don’t need to certify the EIR, just consider it and Don’t need to certify the EIR, just consider it and

make findings as to significant impacts that are make findings as to significant impacts that are within the responsible agency’s jurisdiction.within the responsible agency’s jurisdiction.

Page 62: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Responsible Agency Responsible Agency PitfallsPitfalls

Statutes give a responsible agency limited Statutes give a responsible agency limited means to address inadequate lead agency means to address inadequate lead agency analysis.analysis.

First, if consulted with, the responsible First, if consulted with, the responsible agency must comment on the lead’s agency must comment on the lead’s document. document. If it still doesn’t like the document after project If it still doesn’t like the document after project

approval, it must file suit or forever hold its peace. approval, it must file suit or forever hold its peace. If the SOL has run and it was consulted with, the If the SOL has run and it was consulted with, the

responsible agency is bound to treat the lead’s responsible agency is bound to treat the lead’s CEQA document as 100% valid, unless…CEQA document as 100% valid, unless…

Page 63: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Responsible Agency Responsible Agency PitfallsPitfalls

Second, if the responsible agency can show Second, if the responsible agency can show that changes to the project, the that changes to the project, the circumstances under which it is circumstances under which it is undertaken, or the revelation of “new undertaken, or the revelation of “new significant information that couldn’t have significant information that couldn’t have been previously known show that a been previously known show that a Subsequent EIR (or ND/MND) must be Subsequent EIR (or ND/MND) must be prepared…. prepared…. ……then, the responsible agency may prepare a then, the responsible agency may prepare a

SEIR (or SND/SMND) and deal with the SEIR (or SND/SMND) and deal with the changes.changes.

Page 64: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Responsible Agency Responsible Agency PitfallsPitfalls

Third, if the lead agency never consulted Third, if the lead agency never consulted with the responsible agency when the with the responsible agency when the original CEQA document was processed and original CEQA document was processed and the SOL has expired, the responsible the SOL has expired, the responsible agency can assume lead agency status and agency can assume lead agency status and restart the CEQA process.restart the CEQA process.

As an aside, it should also be noted that if a As an aside, it should also be noted that if a lead agency’s CEQA document is being lead agency’s CEQA document is being litigated against, responsible agencies must litigated against, responsible agencies must treat it as a valid CEQA document until the treat it as a valid CEQA document until the litigation is resolved.litigation is resolved.

Page 65: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Public ReviewPublic Review

30 day minimum.30 day minimum.

45 days required for projects of 45 days required for projects of statewide, regional or area wide statewide, regional or area wide significance, or projects that need significance, or projects that need state agency approval (most state agency approval (most projects.)projects.)

Page 66: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Commenting on an EIRCommenting on an EIR

Authority to CommentAuthority to Comment: Any person or : Any person or entity other than a Responsible Agency entity other than a Responsible Agency may submit oral or written comments to a may submit oral or written comments to a Lead Agency concerning any Lead Agency concerning any environmental effects of a project being environmental effects of a project being considered by the Lead Agency. (State considered by the Lead Agency. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15044) CEQA Guidelines, § 15044)

Timing:Timing: May comment during the public May comment during the public review periods or before the close of the review periods or before the close of the public hearing. public hearing.

Page 67: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Commenting on an EIR Commenting on an EIR (cont.)(cont.)

E-mailE-mail (Public Resources Code, § 21091[d][3]) (Public Resources Code, § 21091[d][3]) The Lead Agency must accept comments on a The Lead Agency must accept comments on a DEIR, Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative DEIR, Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or any CEQA notice via e-mail and Declaration or any CEQA notice via e-mail and must treat e-mail comments as equivalent to must treat e-mail comments as equivalent to written comments. written comments.

Responsible Agencies:Responsible Agencies: A Responsible Agency A Responsible Agency should review and comment on draft EIRs and should review and comment on draft EIRs and Negative Declarations for projects that the Negative Declarations for projects that the Responsible Agency will later be asked to Responsible Agency will later be asked to approve. Comments should be as specific as approve. Comments should be as specific as possible and supported by either oral or written possible and supported by either oral or written documentation.documentation.

Page 68: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Responses to CommentsResponses to Comments

Must respond to each comment received Must respond to each comment received during the comment period. May respond during the comment period. May respond to late comments. It is highly to late comments. It is highly recommended that the lead agency recommended that the lead agency respond to all comments received. respond to all comments received.

Responses may be incorporated as Responses may be incorporated as revisions to the draft EIR or as a separate revisions to the draft EIR or as a separate section in the Final EIR. (State CEQA section in the Final EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15088.) Guidelines, § 15088.)

Page 69: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

““10 Day Rule”10 Day Rule”

At least ten (10) days prior to At least ten (10) days prior to certifying the Final EIR, the lead certifying the Final EIR, the lead agency must provide a written agency must provide a written response to response to any agencyany agency which has which has submitted timely comments on the submitted timely comments on the Draft EIR. But typically lead agency Draft EIR. But typically lead agency will send the entire final EIR to all will send the entire final EIR to all commentors. (21092.5/15088)commentors. (21092.5/15088)

Page 70: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

RecirculationRecirculation

Lead agency must recirculate an EIR when "significant" Lead agency must recirculate an EIR when "significant" new information is added to the EIR, or if the Draft EIR new information is added to the EIR, or if the Draft EIR is so inadequate and conclusory that meaningful public is so inadequate and conclusory that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. (State CEQA review and comment were precluded. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15088.5.) Guidelines, § 15088.5.)

Recirculation not required where information added to Recirculation not required where information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR. If the insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR. If the revision is limited to a few chapters or portions of the revision is limited to a few chapters or portions of the EIR, the Lead Agency need only recirculate the EIR, the Lead Agency need only recirculate the chapters or portions that have been modified. chapters or portions that have been modified.

A decision to not recirculate an EIR must be supported A decision to not recirculate an EIR must be supported by substantial evidence in the record.by substantial evidence in the record.

Page 71: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Final EIRFinal EIR

The Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR, The Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR, any comments and responses to any comments and responses to

comments.comments.

Page 72: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Public HearingPublic Hearing

Not required under CEQA but may be required Not required under CEQA but may be required for the underlying action.for the underlying action.

However, agencies are However, agencies are encouragedencouraged to include to include environmental review as a topic when the agency environmental review as a topic when the agency holds a hearing on a project. A public hearing on holds a hearing on a project. A public hearing on the environmental impact of a project the environmental impact of a project shouldshould be be held if the Lead Agency determines it would held if the Lead Agency determines it would facilitate the purposes and goals of CEQA. A facilitate the purposes and goals of CEQA. A draft EIR, MND or ND draft EIR, MND or ND shouldshould be used as a basis be used as a basis for discussion. (CEQA Guidelines Section for discussion. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15202). 15202).

Page 73: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

EIR CertificationEIR Certification

Staff considers the Final EIR and makes a Staff considers the Final EIR and makes a recommendation to the decisionmaking body recommendation to the decisionmaking body regarding whether the Final EIR is in order and regarding whether the Final EIR is in order and whether it has been completed in compliance with whether it has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State Guidelines and the lead agency’s CEQA, the State Guidelines and the lead agency’s local guidelines. local guidelines.

Before approving a project, a lead agency must Before approving a project, a lead agency must certify that the final EIR was prepared in certify that the final EIR was prepared in compliance with CEQA and was presented to the compliance with CEQA and was presented to the lead agency’s decision making body for review and lead agency’s decision making body for review and consideration before approving the project. Lead consideration before approving the project. Lead agency must also certify that the EIR reflects the agency must also certify that the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency. independent judgment of the lead agency.

Page 74: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Copy of Final EIRCopy of Final EIR

Guidelines Section 15095 Guidelines Section 15095 requiresrequires the lead agency to file a copy of the the lead agency to file a copy of the final EIR with the planning agency of final EIR with the planning agency of any city or county where significant any city or county where significant environmental effects may occur. In environmental effects may occur. In addition, the applicant must be addition, the applicant must be required to provide a copy of the required to provide a copy of the certified final EIR to each responsible certified final EIR to each responsible agency (PRC Section 21092.5(a)). agency (PRC Section 21092.5(a)).

Page 75: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

FindingsFindings (PRC § 21156; Guidelines § (PRC § 21156; Guidelines §

15091)15091) Lead and responsible agencies must prepare Lead and responsible agencies must prepare

written findings of fact for each significant written findings of fact for each significant environmental impact identified in the EIR. A environmental impact identified in the EIR. A finding is a written statement made by the finding is a written statement made by the decision making body that explains how it dealt decision making body that explains how it dealt with each significant impact and alternative. with each significant impact and alternative.

An agency must make findings for each An agency must make findings for each significant impact if the project has been significant impact if the project has been changed, including adoption of mitigation changed, including adoption of mitigation measures to avoid or substantially reduce the measures to avoid or substantially reduce the magnitude of the impact. The agency must magnitude of the impact. The agency must ensure that adopted measures are fully ensure that adopted measures are fully enforceable through permit conditions, enforceable through permit conditions, agreements or other measures.agreements or other measures.

Page 76: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Findings (cont.)Findings (cont.) If lead or responsible agency cannot make these If lead or responsible agency cannot make these

findings, it must find that (i) changes to the project findings, it must find that (i) changes to the project are within another agency’s jurisdiction and such are within another agency’s jurisdiction and such changes have been made or should be adopted or changes have been made or should be adopted or (ii) specific economical/social/legal/technical/other (ii) specific economical/social/legal/technical/other considerations make mitigation measure or considerations make mitigation measure or alternative infeasiblealternative infeasible..

Findings must be well-organized and allow reader Findings must be well-organized and allow reader to understand how the lead agency addressed to understand how the lead agency addressed every significant impact and alternative. If every significant impact and alternative. If mitigation measure or alternative is found mitigation measure or alternative is found infeasible, must explain specific reasons for infeasible, must explain specific reasons for rejection. The mere fact that an alternative may be rejection. The mere fact that an alternative may be more expensive does not necessarily make it more expensive does not necessarily make it infeasibleinfeasible. .

Page 77: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Statement of Overriding Statement of Overriding ConsiderationsConsiderations

A Lead Agency cannot approve a project if it will A Lead Agency cannot approve a project if it will have significant effects on the environment unless it have significant effects on the environment unless it finds that the benefits outweigh the unavoidable finds that the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects. adverse environmental effects.

The statement of overriding considerations is a The statement of overriding considerations is a written statement explaining why the City is willing written statement explaining why the City is willing to accept each significant effect. The statement to accept each significant effect. The statement states forth the specific overriding social, economic, states forth the specific overriding social, economic, legal, technical or other beneficial project aspects legal, technical or other beneficial project aspects supporting the City’s decision and must be based on supporting the City’s decision and must be based on substantial evidence in the final EIR or elsewhere in substantial evidence in the final EIR or elsewhere in the record. the record.

Page 78: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Statement of Overriding Statement of Overriding Considerations (cont.)Considerations (cont.)

Typically, a statement of overriding Typically, a statement of overriding considerations begins with a summary of the considerations begins with a summary of the unavoidable impacts and the lists the factors that unavoidable impacts and the lists the factors that justify approving the project despite these justify approving the project despite these impacts. For example, if a development project impacts. For example, if a development project would result in unavoidable impacts, potential would result in unavoidable impacts, potential benefits would include: creation of local jobs, benefits would include: creation of local jobs, construction of a new school, and/or increase to construction of a new school, and/or increase to the tax base.the tax base.

Findings required ‑ benefits outweigh impacts. Findings required ‑ benefits outweigh impacts.

Page 79: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Approval of ProjectApproval of Project

Only Only AFTERAFTER the EIR is the EIR is certified. (Certification certified. (Certification based on findings, based on findings, Overriding Overriding Considerations, MMRP, Considerations, MMRP, Approval)Approval)

Page 80: Overview Of The CEQA Process CALAFCO Staff Workshop April 15, 2010 Fernando Avila Fernando.Avila@bbklaw.com@bbklaw.com (213) 787-2549 (Direct) Best Best

Notice of DeterminationNotice of Determination (Negative Declarations, MNDs, (Negative Declarations, MNDs,

EIRs)EIRs) Within five Within five workingworking days of project approval, days of project approval,

staff files a Notice of Determination with the staff files a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. The Clerk must post the Notice County Clerk. The Clerk must post the Notice within 24-hours of receipt. If lead agency is within 24-hours of receipt. If lead agency is state agency, or if any state agency approval state agency, or if any state agency approval is required, NOD must also be filed with Office is required, NOD must also be filed with Office of Planning and Research.of Planning and Research.

A 30-day statute of limitations for legal A 30-day statute of limitations for legal challenges begins to run once the NOD has challenges begins to run once the NOD has been filed with, been filed with, and posted byand posted by, the County , the County Clerk. If NOD is not filed, the statute of Clerk. If NOD is not filed, the statute of limitations is 180 days.limitations is 180 days.

Staff simultaneously and conspicuously posts Staff simultaneously and conspicuously posts the Notice at lead agency offices.the Notice at lead agency offices.