overview: the polyvagal theory alternative organizing …the polyvagal theory: the autonomic nervous...
TRANSCRIPT
The following document is a reproduction of slides presented at a workshop in Zurich conducted on May 18-19, 2003. The material contained in this document are only for the educational use of the workshop participants.
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The Polyvagal Theory: The Autonomic Nervous System RevisitedImplications for Somatic Psychotherapists
Stephen W. Porges, Ph.D. Brain-Body Center
Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
[email protected]© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Overview: The Polyvagal Theory1. Evolution provides an organizing principle to understand
neural regulation of the human autonomic nervous system.
2. Three neural circuits form a phylogenetically-ordered response hierarchy that regulate behavioral and physiological adaptation to safe, dangerous, and life threatening environments.
3. “Neuroception” of danger or safety or life threat trigger these adaptive neural circuits.
4. New models relating neural regulation to health, learning, and social behavior may be reversed- engineered into treatments.
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Alternative Organizing Principles
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The metaphor of safety: A basic principle of our nervous system
Environmentoutside the bodyinside the body
Nervous System
Safety Danger
Neuroception
Spontaneously engages otherseye contact, facial expression, prosody supports visceral homeostasis
Defensive strategiesfight/flight behaviors (mobilization)
Life threat
Defensive strategiesdeath feigning/shutdown (immobilization)
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Evolution
X-X+X+X-X+Mammals
X+X+X-X+Reptiles
X+X-X+Amphibians
X+X-X+Teleosts
X-X+Elasmobranchs
X+Cyclostomes
NAAD/mSNSDMXCHMNeural Regulation of the Heart in Vertebrates
CHM = chromaffin tissue DMX = dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus SNS = sympathetic nervous system AD/m = adrenal medulla NA = nucleus ambiguus
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Polyvagal Theory: Emergent “Emotion” Subsystems
VVC SNS DVCheart ratebronchigastrointestinalvasoconstrictionsweatadrenal medullatearsvocalizationfacial muscles
+ / -+ / -
+ / -+ / -+ / -
++
+++
-
--
+
eyelidsmiddle ear muscles
+ / -+ / -
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Polyvagal Theory: Phylogenetic Stages of Neural Control
Dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus
Immobilization (death feigning, passive avoidance)
Unmeyelinated vagus(DVC – dorsal vagal complex)
I
Spinal cordMobilization (active avoidance)
Sympathetic-adrenal system(SNS – sympathetic nervous system)
II
Nucleus ambiguusSocial communication, self-soothing and calming, inhibit sympathetic-adrenal influences
Myelinated vagus(VVC – ventral vagal complex)
III
Lower motor neurons
Behavioral FunctionANS ComponentStage
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
VVC SNS DMX
Communication
Mobilization
Immobilization
+
+
+
FunctionStructure
Head
Limbs
Viscera
Polyvagal Theory: A Phylogenetic Hierarchy of Response Strategies
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Phylogenetic Organization of the ANS: The Polyvagal Theory
head
visceralimbs
trunk
“old” vagus
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Phylogenetic Organization of the ANS: The Polyvagal Theory
head
visceralimbs
trunk
Sympathetic NervousSystem
Corticospinal Pathways
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Mobilization: Flight
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Mobilization: Fight
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Phylogenetic Organization of the ANS: The Polyvagal Theory
head
visceralimbs
trunk
“new” vagusCorticobulbar pathways
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The “Smart” Vagus and Social Engagement System
Cranial Nerves V,VII,IX,X,XI
Muscles of Mastication
Middle Ear Muscles
Facial Muscles
Larynx Heart
Head Turning
Bronchi
Pharynx
cortex
brainstem
environment© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Social Engagement System:Emergent Behaviors at Birth
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Looking and Listening: Common Neurophysiological Mechanisms
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The Listening Project:Before Intervention
Borg & Counter, 1989Scientific Americant
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
VVC SNS DMX
Communication
Mobilization
Immobilization
+
+
+
FunctionStructure
Head
Limbs
Viscera
Polyvagal Theory: A Phylogenetic Hierarchy of Response Strategies
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The Face: A Critical Component of a Social Engagement System
•Unlike reptiles, the mammalian nervous system needs a “caregiver” to survive and signals the caregiver via the muscles of the face and head.
•The face is “hardwired” to the neural regulation of visceral state via a mammalian “neural circuit.”
•Physical and mental illness retract the “mammalian” neural circuit with the resultant symptoms of a face that does not work.
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Unveiling Darwin
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Social Engagement System: Observable Deficits in Several Psychiatric and
Behavioral Disorders
• Prosody
• Gaze
• Facial expressivity
• Mood and affect
• Posture during social engagement
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Phylogenetic Organization of the ANS: The Polyvagal Theory
head
visceralimbs
trunk
“new” vagusCorticobulbar pathways
My Child’s Face Does Not Work!
Gabriel Metzu, The Sick Child
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
When Other Faces Do Not Work!
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Beauty is a journey that starts with a
choice… Learn about your
Choices
Beauty is a journey that starts with a
choice… Learn about your
Choices
When the nervous system fails use Botox!
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Autism
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The “Social Nervous System”
Frontal cortex
Precentral gyrus
Medullary source nuclei of SVE
Laryngeal Pharyngeal
Head turning
Facial Middle ear HeartBronchi Thymus
Muscles of the Head
Neuropeptides
AVP OT
HPA axis
Visceromotor Components
Somatomotor Components© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Voodoo Death: Insights into PTSD
His cheeks blanch, and his eyes become glassy, and the expression of his face becomes horribly distorted. He attempts to shriek but usually the sound chokes in his throat, and all that one might see is froth at his mouth. His body begins to tremble and his muscles twitch involuntarily. He sways backward and falls to the ground, and after a short time he appears to be in a swoon. He finally composes himself, goes to his hut and there frets to death.
R. Herbert Basedow (1925), The Australian Aboriginal
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Voodoo Death: Insights into PTSD
• Voodoo Death was defined as death due not disease or injury, but do to emotional stress.
• Cannon assumed that even this "immobilized" response would be associated with increased sympathetic nervous system excitation.
• "If in the future, however, any observer has opportunity to see an instance of voodoo death, it is to be hoped that he will conduct the simpler tests before the victim's last gasp.”
Cannon, W.B. (1942) "Voodoo" death. Amer. Anthropol., 44: 169.
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Hopelessness: Vagal or Sympathetic Mechanisms?
“...we believe that human victims, like our rats, may well die a parasympathetic rather than a sympathico-adrenal death, as Cannon postulated”
C.P. Richter (1957)
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
A New Paradigm?
• If social behaviors are not learned, are they emergent properties of specific neurophysological states?
• If dysfunctional social behavior is a spontaneously occurring emergent property of the nervous system (i.e., part of a feedback loop), could intervention strategies be focused on manipulating or supporting the neurophysiological states (e.g., engaging and exercising feedback loops) from which social behavior would spontaneously occur?
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
New Model
Mobilization
“Insult”
Behavioral/PsychologicalOutcomes
Immobilization
Social Nervous System
Social CommunicationState regulation
HyperarousalHypervigilance
AvoidantSocial Withdrawal
Affect limitationsSelf-medication
Dissociative statesRisk of Suicide
HypertensionGut problems
Anxiety disorders
HypotensionVasovagal syncope
Fibromyalgia
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Reverse Engineering: A Treatment Model
Mobilization
Intervention
Behavioral/PsychologicalOutcomes
Immobilization
Social Nervous System
Social Communication
Enhanced social behavior, affect regulation, state regulation
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Principle 1. Less is more (fragile system)Principle 2. The intervention must occur in a “safe” environment (“neuroception”)Principle 3. The auditory system has an efferent component that actively select human voice from background sounds (corticobulbar)Principle 4. Due to common embryological development in the nervous system, the cortical regulation required to select human voice will improve state regulation and social behavior (special visceral efferent pathways - SVE)
The Listening Project:Principles of Intervention
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Principle 1. Less is more (fragile system)Principle 2. The intervention must occur in a “safe” environment (“neuroception”)Principle 3. The auditory system has an efferent component that actively select human voice from background sounds (corticobulbar)Principle 4. Due to common embryological development in the nervous system, the cortical regulation required to select human voice will improve state regulation and social behavior (SVE)
The Listening Project:Principles of Intervention
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The Listening Project:During Intervention
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Improved Social Engagement
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Percentage of Children
0 20 40 60 80 100
hearing sensitivityspontaneity
communicationspeech
listeningcontingencyrelatedness
eye contactbehavioral organization
em otional control
affect expressionhyperactivity
Improvem ent post Intervention-1Improvem ent post Placebo-1
Behavioral Improvements
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Follow-up Assessments
Percentage of C h ildren
0 20 40 60 80 100
Im m ediate Im provem entIm provem ent fo llow ing 1 m onthIm provem ent fo llow ing 3 m onths
hearing sensitiv ity
spon tane itycom m unica tion
speechlisten ing
con tingencyre latedness
eye contact
behaviora l organizationem otional contro l
affect express ionhyperactiv ity
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
John’s Story: Before
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Six Months Later
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Measuring Eye Gaze
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reservedOff = 79% Eye = 10% Mouth = 11%
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Off = 21% Eye = 33% Mouth = 46%© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The Listening Project:Effects of the Intervention?
Triggers the “Social Engagement System”
Stimulates processes associated with attention, intention, and contingency
Increases looking, listening, vocalizing and responding
Increases the “integration” of social engagement behaviors
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
What we know?
• Noticeable effects on the Social Engagement System in 3-5 year old ASD
• Effects observed in about 80% of approximately 100 subjects
• Parental reports
• Behavioral coding of video tapes
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
What Needs to be Done?• Apply The Listing Project to other psychiatric diagnostic categories that have affect regulation problems.
•Validate the neural mechanisms mediating the behavioral changes (fMRI, NIRS, ANS, facial EMG & IR thermography) to demonstrate the involvement of frontal areas of cortex (i.e. corticobulbar pathways).
•Expand intervention strategies to efficiently trigger neural circuits to support social behavior
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Summary• “Neuroception” of safety or danger mediates the
beneficial consequences of social behavior.• Autonomic reactions to challenges are organized
in a phylogenetically-determined hierarchy.• Various atypical behaviors are adaptive for short
periods.• Several psychopathologies are expressed as
deficits in the Social Engagement System.• Biologically-based behavioral interventions can
trigger neural circuits that mediate positive social behavior.
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
The Future of Biobehavioral Research:New Organizational Principles
Several physical and psychiatric diseases are emergent properties of the neural regulation of the autonomic nervous system (feedback, evolution, development)
New diagnoses and new treatments will emphasize measurement and manipulation of the neural regulation of the autonomic nervous system
Environments will be designed that support the functions of the nervous system
– Computers that modulate neural regulation of the ANS
– Quiet environments
– Nervous system “friendly” classrooms
– Improved social behavior: People need people – a biological basis
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved
Blissful, but not social!
© 2003 Stephen W. Porges. All rights reserved