pablo roybal elementary · -1.2 2.9 -1.4 2.8 - - - - -1.3 2.8 - - - - -1.3 2.8 -1.5 2.7 -1.4 2.8 -...

0

25

50

75

100

Ov

era

ll P

oin

ts

2012 2013 2014

District:Grade Range: 72123Code:

Pojoaque Valley Public Schools

Pablo Roybal Elementary

School Grade Report Card2014

Final Grade

B

75.0 100.0

60.0 75.0

50.0 60.0

37.5 50.0

37.5

A

B

C

D

F

to <

TotalPoints

Final School Grade

65.2460.4

B

3 Year Average

This SchoolStatewide C Benchmark

PK 03

to <

to <

to <

to <

-

0.0

Certified

SchoolPoints

30.34

6.33

5.8

Student Growth of Lowest Performing Students

Current Standing

Student Growth of Highest Performing Students

10

20

20

40

PossiblePointsGrade

B

F

C

B

How did students perform in the most recent school year? Students are tested on how well they met targets for their grade level.

How well did the school help individual students improve? The highest performing students are those whose prior scores placed them in the top three quarters (75%) of their school. Individual student growth over the past 3 years is compared to the state benchmark.

11.29

8.68

Bonus Points

5Does the school show exceptional aptitude for involving students and parents in education, reducing truancy, and promoting extracurricular activities?

3.19

School Growth

10CIn the past 3 years did the school increase grade level performance? For example did this year's 3rd graders improve over last year's 3rd graders? 5.41

How well did the school help individual students improve? The lowest performing students are those whose prior scores placed them in the bottom quarter (25%) of their school. Individual student growth over the past 3 years is compared to the state benchmark.

Does the school foster an environment that facilitates learning? Are teachers using recognized instructional methods, and do students want to come to school?

Opportunity to Learn

21.3

7.2

7.5

15.3

1.6

School Grading 2014

Reading (%)

14 10 15

2321

24

57 63 50

6 7 10

2012 2013 2014

Math (%)

8 5 9

27 2529

60 6560

5 4 2

2012 2013 2014

Performance is considered on grade level when students score either Proficient or Advanced.

Reading

Math

These next pages show the school's results divided into smaller groups to show how specific classes of students are doing. The information explains how a school compares to other schools, and identifies groups within the school that are performing well or that need additional instructional support based on achievement. Points that the school earned on each of the indicators are provided in more detail, and when summed will arrive at the totals on the first page summary.

Proficient and Advanced (%)

Current Standing

Knowing how many students are proficient in a given year is a measure of the school’s overall success. Single-year performance will vary with differing classes of students. Therefore, Current Standing uses up to 3 years of data to provide a more accurate picture of the school's achievement.

Current Standing is augmented with Value Added Modeling (VAM) by capturing the school's size, student mobility, and prior student performance. Details of VAM can be found in the PED's School Grading Technical Manual at: http://webapp2.ped.state.nm.us/SchoolData/SchoolGrading.aspx.

Proficient and Advanced (Pts)



60.4 63.9 56.7 - - 61.2 - 51.1 <2.0 40.5 84.2 57.1

7.55

62.6 63.9 61.2 - - 63.8 - 51.1 14.3 35.7 84.2 52.4

7.82

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian

EnglishLanguageLearners

Studentswith

DisabilitiesEconomically

DisadvantagedAsianMF

Gender Race / EthnicityRedesignated

EnglishProficient

Value Added Model (Pts) 7.50


Details of Each Grade Indicator

3 Year Summary

Advanced

Proficient

Nearing Proficient

Beginning Step

School Grading 2014 Pablo Roybal Elementary of 6

ReadingDifference from

Expected Growth (SS Points)

School Growth

Points Earned

Math

0.098

2.93

-0.697

2.49

School Growth is shown in scaled score points, which range from 0 to 80 for both reading and math. A school that grows an average of +2 scaled score points a year shows that the school is generally improving their ability to increase student achievement.

School growth compares the students enrolled in the current year to students from prior years. While these are partly different sets of students, the school that is improving will do a better job each year of impacting their achievement. Unlike Current Standing, School Growth accounts for improvement of all students, not just those reaching proficient.

School Growth is augmented with Value Added Modeling (VAM) which accounts for the school's size, student mobility, and prior student performance. Details of VAM can be found in the PED"s School Grading Technical Manual at: http://webapp2.ped.state.nm.us/SchoolData/SchoolGrading.aspx

Student Growth

-5

5

2012 2013 2014

SS P

ts p

er Y

ear

2012 2013 2014

Just like schools, individual student achievement is expected to improve over time. Student growth is shown as the average change in scaled score (SS) points per year, and is averaged for all students in each group for up to 3 years. Student groups are further divided into highest and lowest performing subgroups.Scores on the assessment range from 0 to 80, and a score of 40 indicates that a student is proficient or on grade level. A student's prior test scores are used to estimate how the student should perform today. When growth is positive (+) students score better than expected in the current year: • Above 0 means that the group, in general, scored higher than expected. This is an exciting finding, especially when students are below the proficiency line, because they are closing the achievement gap and catching up to their higher-performing classmates. • Near 0 means that the group scored about as expected. While some students may have performed better than anticipated (positive growth), they were equally balanced by students that did poorer (negative growth). • Below 0 means that the group performed below expectations and students are losing ground when compared to their peers.Details of Student Growth and scaled scores are explained in the Technical Guide on the PED website: http://webapp2.ped.state.nm.us/SchoolData/SchoolGrading.aspx

Reading Growth

Math Growth

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

-2.3 - - -2.3 - -2.4 -2.4 - -2.5 -2.3

2.38

3.94

6.35

4.93

AllStudents

AfricanAmericanWhite Hispanic

AmIndian


Studentswith

DisabilitiesEcon

DisadvAsianMaleFemale


EnglishProficient

Remaining Gap Between Highest and Lowest Performing Students in 2014

Range

2.0 - - 2.0 - 1.9 1.9 - 1.8 2.1 -2.4 2.0

-.9 - - -.9 - - -.9 -1.2 -1.0 - 3.4 - - 3.4 - - 3.4 3.1 3.3 - -1.0 3.4

-2.7 - - -2.7 - -2.9 -2.9 - -3.0 -2.6 1.4 - - 1.4 - 1.3 1.3 - 1.1 1.6 -2.7 1.4

-1.2 - - -1.3 - - -1.3 -1.5 -1.4 - 2.9 - - 2.8 - - 2.8 2.7 2.8 - -1.4 2.8

18.0

18.0

Reading

Math

Scaled Score Differences

Growth for lower performing students must be sufficient to meaningfully close the achievement gap. Minimums required annually are: Math +1.3 per year Reading +1.7 per year

Student Growth in Scaled Score Points per Year Highest 75%

Lowest 25% Reading Math

-.7

-0.3

1.7

1.7

Range Range Range Range Range Range Range Range Range Range


OTL Survey Questions

Opportunity to Learn (OTL)

The successful school invites students to be part of a thriving learning culture that uses proven teaching methods. A school's learning environment is reflected in a survey of classroom practices (OTL Survey) and in student attendance.

OTL Survey (Average Total Score)

OTL Survey (Points)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith


DisadvantAsianMF


English Proficient

2.9

3.8

3.0

3.2

3.5

3.6

3.6

2.8

4.5

2.9

34.3

3.0 2.9 - - 2.9 - 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.9

3.8 3.8 - - 3.8 - 3.9 4.0 3.5 4.2 3.8

3.1 2.9 - - 2.9 - 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.5 2.7

3.1 3.3 - - 3.1 - 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.1

3.7 3.3 - - 3.5 - 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.1

3.8 3.4 - - 3.6 - 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.5

3.7 3.5 - - 3.7 - 3.2 3.6 2.9 3.3 3.9

2.8 2.9 - - 2.8 - 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.9 2.8

4.7 4.3 - - 4.6 - 4.2 4.5 4.1 4.2 4.9

3.0 2.9 - - 2.9 - 3.2 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.6

35.0 33.5 - - 34.2 - 34.7 34.4 31.5 34.2 34.6

Color Key: 4 or 5, Rated High 2 or 3, Rated Mid 0 or 1, Rated Low

3.81

OTL Attendance (Student Average)

OTL Attendance (Points)

92.5 92.3 92.7 87.8 - 93.4 - 89.8 92.3 82.0 93.6 95.8

4.87

The answer to each question ranges from 0 (Never) to 5 (Always), with a midpoint score of 2.5. Schools that scored higher demonstrated better classroom teaching practices.

1. My teacher introduces a new lesson by reminding us of things we already know.

2. My teacher explains why what we are learning is important.

3. My teacher explains how learning each lesson will help us in the future.

4. Everybody gets a chance to answer questions.

5. My teacher wants me to explain my answers.

6. My teacher explains things in different ways so everyone can understand.

7. My teacher helps me when I do not understand.

8. I use different mateirals and tools to help me practice what I am learning.

9. My teacher makes sure I understand.

10. My teacher takes the time to summarize what we learn each day.

Bonus Points

While most schools provide a sampling of athletics, club participation opportunities, and parent meetings, a few schools stand out among the rest. These schools are recognized for their extraordinary dedication to keeping students invested in school, and their efforts in empowering parents to engage actively in their child's education. Bonus points indicate those schools that have gone above and beyond the others.

Parental EngagementStudent Engagement Truancy ImprovementExtracurricular Activities

Schools must include all of their enrolled students in the annual statewide assessment. If the percentage of the All Students group is less than 95%, the school's letter grade is reduced by one grade. Supplemental Accountability Schools (SAM) and small schools with fewer than 40 students receive special consideration.

>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Reading (%)

>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Math (%)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith



Gender Race / Ethnicity RedesignatedEnglish

Proficient

Participation


Ranks High Ranks Mid Ranks Low

Current Standing 3 7 715 2

Similar Schools

While statewide comparisons are helpful, schools may want to see how they rank next to their peers that have similar students and settings. The figures below show how this school contrasts with other schools in the state that are most like it in student characteristics.

School Growth 23 24 2625 33

Student Growth, Lowest 25% 36 30 3629 34

Opportunity to Learn 43 46 4645 41

ELL SWD Ethnicity ED Mobility

Student Growth, Highest 75% 14 10 1110 20

Schools are grouped into categories that have similar proportions of English language learners (ELL), students with disabilities (SWD), ethnicities, economically disadvantaged (ED), and mobile students. Different schools are in each category set. A composite score incorporates all categories into a general measure of at-risk students. Higher ranking schools had more points in that indicator.

6

25

32

41

Composite

11

School Rank

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

45

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

Supplemental Information

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

Students (% Tested) 30.2 67.6 12.910.1 99.3

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

Rank Total Rank Total Rank Total Rank Total Rank Total Rank Total

Reading

School Growth Targets

Math

80.2 - - 82.4 - 71.4 76.7 - 73.9 78.9 81.8

21.1 - - 25.8 - - 20.6 30.8 15.8 20.0 21.7

74.8 - 75.0 - 69.2 61.9 - 56.5 88.9 75.0 74.5

2.8 - 3.6 - - 3.2 .0 .0 - 6.3 .0

88.2

-

-

-

Customized targets, called School Growth Targets (SGTs), guide a school's path toward proficiency. These goals increase every year and challenge schools to identify student groups that might be struggling to keep up with their peers. Students who are not proficient but have made large enough gains to become proficient in the next 3 years are considered "on track" to proficiency and are included in the percentages below.

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Target 61.0%

Graduation

Target 55.0%

Highest 75% (%)

Lowest 25% (%)

Highest 75% (%

Lowest 25% (%)

Target 73.7%

For high schools graduation rates for the Cohort of 2013 are available on page 5.

All White AfrAmer

Hisp Asian AmIndian

Proportion of Students Reaching the Target

ELLSWDED

ReadingMath

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Target

MF REP All White AfrAmer

Hisp Asian AmIndian

ELLSWDEDMF REP


42.4 - - - 40.0 40.0 26.4 37.3 47.2 43.9 40.7

School History

Student performance over time can demonstrate the success of interventions and school reform. Scaled scores (SS) range from 0 to 80, and 40 is the threshold for proficiency (on grade level). For a more detailed history see the NMPED website: http://www.ped.state.nm.us/AssessmentAccountability/AcademicGrowth/NMSBA.html

42.3

Reading

Math

- - - 40.4 38.3 38.3 48.0 42.4 42.3

42.9 - 41.2 32.2 36.6 47.1 43.7 42.1

40.5

42.7

42.6

- 42.5 - 43.4

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

41.0 41.9 - - - 39.5 30.8 36.1 44.9 42.6 41.4 42.2

42.8 - 41.5 37.1 39.1 49.6 42.0 43.6 - 42.9 - 42.6

42.2 - 39.8 30.2 36.4 48.1 43.1 41.2 - 42.6 - 39.52014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

2014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

Student Promotion

Students that are prepared and progress to a higher grade each year (matriculate) indicate that the school is successfully moving students toward graduation. However, if the school's achievement in Reading and Math is subpar, and yet most students are being promoted, the school may be inattentive to a student's need to repeat grade-level instruction before moving on.

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Percent of students scoring Beginning Step (lowest) in the prior year that moved to a higher grade.

Grade 3 to Grade 4 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

Grade 5 to Grade 6 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

Grade 8 to Grade 9 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

-

-

-

The Statewide C grade was established in the first year of school grading as the midpoint of all schools. It was fixed in 2011 as the framework for all future letter grades and is not recalculated each year.Final letter grades are established at the 90th and 50th percentiles, which represent 75 and 50 points respectively. For high schools that do not have members of 4-year 5-year or 6-year graduation cohorts, the scale is abbreviated and letter grades are adjusted to account for the school's remaining non-cohort indicators or non-cohort years.A dash is substituted where a school has too few students (N<10) to meet confidentiality requirements for reporting.Feeder schools are schools that do not have students in tested grades 3-8, 10, or 11. These school are rated using the performance of their alumni.Redesignated English Proficient are students that were once English Language Learners and have since become fluent. New Mexico began this reporting category in 2012 and some data systems have not yet caught up. These fields are marked with "N/A" (not yet available).During the 2013-2014 school year, schools across New Mexico piloted assessments on computers. To recognize these efforts, schools that offered the SBA on computers received bonus credit based on the number of students participating.

End Notes

1

2

34

5

6


0

25

50

75

100

Ov

era

ll P

oin

ts

2012 2013 2014



Pojoaque Intermediate


Final Grade

C

75.0 100.0

60.0 75.0

50.0 60.0

37.5 50.0

37.5

A

B

C

D

F

to <

TotalPoints

Final School Grade

53.1245.9

D

3 Year Average


04 05

to <

to <

to <

to <

-

0.0

Certified

SchoolPoints

25.02

0.84

5.8


Current Standing


10

20

20

40

PossiblePointsGrade

B

D

F

A



11.63

9.22

Bonus Points


1.44

School Growth

10DIn the past 3 years did the school increase grade level performance? For example did this year's 3rd graders improve over last year's 3rd graders? 4.97




21.3

7.2

7.5

15.3

1.6

School Grading 2014

Reading (%)

8 11 8

3044

36

4937

49

12 9 8

2012 2013 2014

Math (%)

15 20 15

3544

31

4031

45

9 5 10

2012 2013 2014


Reading

Math



Current Standing






56.5 60.3 52.6 61.5 - 55.8 - 51.3 18.8 7.7 60.5 57.8

7.07

54.3 48.9 60.0 69.2 - 53.5 - 47.7 6.3 7.7 55.8 55.6

6.79

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient




3 Year Summary

Advanced

Proficient

Nearing Proficient

Beginning Step

School Grading 2014 Pojoaque IntermediatePage 2 of 6



School Growth

Points Earned

Math

-0.293

1.39

-0.345

3.58




Student Growth

-5.00E+00

5.00E+00

2012 2013 2014

SS P

ts p

er Y

ear

2012 2013 2014


Reading Growth

Math Growth

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

-3.6 - - -3.7 - -3.7 -3.7 - - -3.7

0.19

0.65

4.07

7.56

AllStudents


AmIndian


Studentswith

DisabilitiesEcon



EnglishProficient


Range

.6 - - .6 - .6 .5 - - .6 -3.7 .6

-.8 - - -1.0 - -.8 -.9 -1.1 -1.2 -.8 3.5 - - 3.3 - 3.5 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.5 -1.0 3.3

-4.3 -4.1 - -4.2 - -4.3 -4.3 - - -4.2 -.2 .0 - -.1 - -.2 -.2 - - -.1 -4.1 .0

-3.1 - - -3.1 - -3.5 -3.2 -3.5 -3.4 -3.1 1.0 - - 1.0 - .6 .9 .6 .7 1.1 -3.2 .9

11.0

15.0

Reading

Math





-2.2

-1.5

1.0

2.5



OTL Survey Questions




OTL Survey (Points)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith


DisadvantAsianMF


English Proficient

3.5

3.9

3.7

3.5

4.3

4.0

4.4

3.0

4.6

3.5

38.1

3.5 3.4 3.3 - 3.5 - 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.4

4.0 3.9 4.1 - 3.9 - 4.0 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.0

3.6 3.7 3.5 - 3.7 - 3.4 3.7 4.2 4.3 3.7

3.4 3.5 3.1 - 3.6 - 3.1 3.5 3.3 2.8 3.5

4.4 4.3 4.5 - 4.3 - 4.4 4.3 4.7 4.5 4.4

4.2 3.8 3.8 - 4.1 - 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.0

4.5 4.3 4.7 - 4.4 - 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.4 4.4

3.0 3.1 2.8 - 3.0 - 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.1 3.0

4.6 4.6 4.6 - 4.6 - 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6

3.5 3.4 3.3 - 3.5 - 3.7 3.5 3.1 3.3 3.2

38.3 37.9 37.8 - 38.3 - 37.2 38.2 39.2 38.7 38.1


4.23


OTL Attendance (Points)

94.7 94.5 94.9 92.9 - 95.0 - 93.8 94.4 93.5 94.4 94.8

4.98


1. My teacher introduces a new lesson by reminding us of things we already know.


3. My teacher explains how learning each lesson will help us in the future.

4. Everybody gets a chance to answer questions.



7. My teacher helps me when I do not understand.

8. I use different mateirals and tools to help me practice what I am learning.

9. My teacher makes sure I understand.


Bonus Points




>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Reading (%)

>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Math (%)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




Proficient

Participation




Similar Schools








35

29

34

19

Composite

43

School Rank

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46

46


( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

Students (% Tested) 9.4 69.9 8.75.8 95.3

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )


Reading


Math

41.0 - - 40.0 - 40.0 36.2 - - 47.2 34.3

30.3 - - 25.5 - 33.3 29.1 18.2 11.1 33.3 27.3

37.4 36.4 39.6 - 28.6 28.8 - - 33.3 29.0 46.2

3.1 - 3.8 - .0 .0 .0 .0 7.4 .0 6.5

37.3

40.7

-

-


AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Target 61.0%

Graduation

Target 55.0%

Highest 75% (%)

Lowest 25% (%)

Highest 75% (%

Lowest 25% (%)

Target 73.7%


All White AfrAmer

Hisp Asian AmIndian


ELLSWDED

ReadingMath

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Target


Hisp Asian AmIndian

ELLSWDEDMF REP


40.3 42.7 - - 39.4 39.2 30.4 30.2 40.6 41.0 39.5

School History


39.3

Reading

Math

40.4 - - 37.0 26.0 29.9 38.5 40.8 37.7

39.1 38.9 37.2 29.2 31.6 41.2 39.7 38.5

37.2

40.3

39.7

- 39.9 - 34.5

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

40.0 41.6 40.4 - - 38.2 28.7 33.4 45.2 43.7 39.1 42.2

36.4 37.3 34.3 24.6 26.4 36.1 36.1 36.7 - 36.6 - 34.5

39.4 43.0 38.0 27.4 27.5 39.8 38.5 40.4 - 39.5 - 38.02014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

2014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

Student Promotion


AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient


Grade 3 to Grade 4 (%) >98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 - - -- -

Grade 5 to Grade 6 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

Grade 8 to Grade 9 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

-

-

-


End Notes

1

2

34

5

6


0

25

50

75

100

Ov

era

ll P

oin

ts

2012 2013 2014



Pojoaque 6th Grade Academy


Final Grade

F

75.0 100.0

60.0 75.0

50.0 60.0

37.5 50.0

37.5

A

B

C

D

F

to <

TotalPoints

Final School Grade

36.3649.2

D

3 Year Average


06 06

to <

to <

to <

to <

-

0.0

Certified

SchoolPoints

11.28

1.99

5.8


Current Standing


10

20

20

40

PossiblePointsGrade

F

F

F

A



6.90

9.17

Bonus Points


0.00

School Growth

10BIn the past 3 years did the school increase grade level performance? For example did this year's 3rd graders improve over last year's 3rd graders? 7.02




21.3

7.2

7.5

15.3

1.6

School Grading 2014

Reading (%)

187 14

3438

42

41 4737

8 8 6

2012 2013 2014

Math (%)

2716 23

41

38

50

3043

24

2 4 2

2012 2013 2014


Reading

Math



Current Standing






43.2 53.1 33.8 - - 44.3 - 37.1 <2.0 10.0 48.1 35.0

5.40

26.5 25.0 27.9 - - 30.2 - 20.0 9.1 <2.0 14.8 10.0

3.31

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient




3 Year Summary

Advanced

Proficient

Nearing Proficient

Beginning Step

School Grading 2014 Pojoaque 6th Grade AcademyPage 2 of 6



School Growth

Points Earned

Math

0.143

3.10

-0.217

3.91




Student Growth

-5

5

2012 2013 2014

SS P

ts p

er Y

ear

2012 2013 2014


Reading Growth

Math Growth

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

-3.1 - - -3.2 - -3.3 -3.3 - - -3.2

0.41

1.57

3.84

3.06

AllStudents


AmIndian


Studentswith

DisabilitiesEcon



EnglishProficient


Range

1.1 - - 1.1 - 1.0 1.0 - - 1.1 -3.2 1.0

-1.8 - - -1.9 - - -1.9 - - -1.8 2.5 - - 2.3 - - 2.4 - - 2.5 -2.0 2.3

-3.9 - - -3.9 - -4.3 -4.0 - - -4.1 .2 - - .3 - -.2 .1 - - .0 -3.9 .2

-2.7 - - -2.9 - - -2.8 - - -2.6 1.4 - - 1.2 - - 1.3 - - 1.5 -2.8 1.3

11.0

12.0

Reading

Math





-1.8

-1.0

1.0

1.1



OTL Survey Questions Reading



OTL Survey (Points Earned)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith


DisadvantAsianMF

Gender Race / Ethnicity Redesignated English

Proficient

3.4

4.1

3.3

3.4

4.6

3.7

4.0

3.4

3.8

3.4

36.8

3.6 3.1 - - 3.4 - 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.2

4.0 4.1 - - 4.1 - 4.2 4.1 4.1 3.7 4.0

3.3 3.3 - - 3.4 - 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.2

3.4 3.4 - - 3.4 - 3.3 3.4 2.5 3.4 3.2

4.6 4.5 - - 4.7 - 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.1 4.4

3.7 3.6 - - 3.6 - 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7

4.2 3.9 - - 4.0 - 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.9 4.1

3.3 3.5 - - 3.5 - 2.9 3.4 3.9 4.3 3.2

3.9 3.8 - - 3.8 - 3.7 3.7 4.3 4.2 3.7

3.6 3.1 - - 3.4 - 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.1 3.2

37.5 36.2 - - 37.0 - 34.5 36.7 36.0 37.3 35.9


4.13


OTL Attendance (Points Earned)

95.8 96.2 95.5 - - 95.8 - 95.9 95.6 95.7 96.7 96.4

5.04

1. My teacher introduces a new topic by connecting to things I already know.


3. My teacher explains how learning a new topic is a foundation for other topics.

4. Every student gets a chance to answer questions.


6. My teacher knows when I understand, and when I do not.


8. My teacher gives me helpful feedback on work I turn in.

9. My teacher checks our understanding.




OTL Survey Questions Math

3.6

4.0

3.5

3.5

4.5

3.7

4.1

3.5

3.9

3.6

3.7 3.6 - - 3.7 - 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.9 3.6

3.9 4.2 - - 4.1 - 3.9 4.1 3.6 4.1 4.0

3.6 3.5 - - 3.6 - 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.7 3.4

3.5 3.5 - - 3.5 - 3.0 3.5 2.9 4.0 3.1

4.6 4.4 - - 4.6 - 4.3 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.6

3.7 3.6 - - 3.6 - 3.5 3.6 3.2 3.9 3.6

4.2 3.9 - - 4.1 - 4.0 4.1 3.6 4.7 4.1

3.6 3.4 - - 3.6 - 2.8 3.5 3.5 4.2 3.2

4.0 3.8 - - 3.9 - 3.6 3.8 3.8 4.1 3.7

3.7 3.6 - - 3.7 - 3.5 3.6 3.0 4.2 3.0












Bonus Points





Similar Schools








24

10

29

8

Composite

30

School Rank

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

30

30

30

30

30

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

30

30

30

30

30


( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

Students (% Tested) 7.6 79.5 9.18.3 95.5

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )


38.2 - - - 37.6 37.1 25.4 27.1 39.0 40.1 36.4

School History


40.4

Reading

Math

- - - 36.7 30.7 30.8 43.3 42.1 38.2

34.3 - 32.2 22.9 26.0 37.4 34.7 33.9

38.6

38.3

41.0

- 34.0 - 33.8

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

35.9 37.7 - - - 36.4 23.4 29.4 40.5 38.8 36.7 37.5

38.3 - 37.1 28.5 31.0 41.2 39.5 36.8 - 38.8 - 36.1

35.2 - 33.8 24.2 26.1 33.5 34.8 35.6 - 35.8 - 32.22014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

2014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)


>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Reading (%)

>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Math (%)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




Proficient

Participation


Reading


Math

46.7 - - 48.0 - 46.2 38.6 - - 46.2 47.5

17.5 - - 12.9 - - 17.1 - - 16.7 17.9

23.2 - 23.5 - 18.2 17.8 - - 13.2 18.6 26.9

.0 - .0 - - .0 - - .0 .0 .0

46.3

23.1

-

-


AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Target 61.0%

Graduation

Target 55.0%

Highest 75% (%)

Lowest 25% (%)

Highest 75% (%

Lowest 25% (%)

Target 73.7%


All White AfrAmer

Hisp Asian AmIndian


ELLSWDED

ReadingMath

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Target


Hisp Asian AmIndian

ELLSWDEDMF REP

Student Promotion


AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient


Grade 3 to Grade 4 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

Grade 5 to Grade 6 (%) >98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 - - >98.0>98.0 >98.0

Grade 8 to Grade 9 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

-

-

-


End Notes

1

2

34

5

6


0

25

50

75

100

Ov

era

ll P

oin

ts

2012 2013 2014



Pojoaque Middle


Final Grade

D

75.0 100.0

60.0 75.0

50.0 60.0

37.5 50.0

37.5

A

B

C

D

F

to <

TotalPoints

Final School Grade

42.1448.3

D

3 Year Average


07 08

to <

to <

to <

to <

-

0.0

Certified

SchoolPoints

10.52

4.23

5.8


Current Standing


10

20

20

40

PossiblePointsGrade

F

D

D

B



12.53

8.66

Bonus Points


0.58

School Growth

10CIn the past 3 years did the school increase grade level performance? For example did this year's 3rd graders improve over last year's 3rd graders? 5.62




21.3

7.2

7.5

15.3

1.6

School Grading 2014

Reading (%)

19 16 11

33 3634

45 4550

3 2 4

2012 2013 2014

Math (%)

17 21 22

4850 49

33 28 29

1 1 0

2012 2013 2014


Reading

Math



Current Standing






54.5 58.1 50.6 71.4 - 55.3 - 48.4 6.3 18.8 66.4 44.9

6.81

29.0 29.7 28.4 42.9 - 30.8 - 24.0 6.3 5.8 34.5 16.3

3.63

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient




3 Year Summary

Advanced

Proficient

Nearing Proficient

Beginning Step

School Grading 2014 Pojoaque MiddlePage 2 of 6



School Growth

Points Earned

Math

0.573

4.41

-1.118

1.21




Student Growth

-5

5

2012 2013 2014

SS P

ts p

er Y

ear

2012 2013 2014


Reading Growth

Math Growth

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

-2.6 -2.3 - -2.6 - -2.6 -2.7 - -2.9 -2.6

1.07

3.15

5.64

6.89

AllStudents


AmIndian


Studentswith

DisabilitiesEcon



EnglishProficient


Range

1.7 1.9 - 1.6 - 1.7 1.6 - 1.4 1.6 -2.7 1.6

-.2 - - -.3 - -.2 -.3 -.5 -.3 - 4.1 - - 4.0 - 4.1 4.0 3.7 4.0 - -.3 4.0

-3.4 -3.1 - -3.4 - -3.5 -3.5 -3.9 -3.9 -3.3 .7 1.0 - .7 - .6 .6 .2 .2 .8 -3.4 .7

-1.6 - - -1.7 - -1.7 -1.7 -2.1 -1.8 -1.6 2.5 - - 2.4 - 2.4 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.5 -1.8 2.3

13.0

12.0

Reading

Math





-1.3

-0.5

1.5

2.3







AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith


DisadvantAsianMF


Proficient

3.1

3.4

2.9

3.3

4.0

2.9

3.2

2.6

3.0

3.1

31.1

3.1 3.0 3.3 - 3.0 - 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

3.4 3.4 2.9 - 3.4 - 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.3

2.8 3.1 3.6 - 2.9 - 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9

3.3 3.4 3.5 - 3.4 - 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.3

4.0 4.0 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.0

2.9 3.0 3.0 - 3.0 - 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.7 3.0

3.1 3.4 2.9 - 3.3 - 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3

2.4 2.8 2.0 - 2.7 - 2.4 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.4

3.0 3.1 2.9 - 3.1 - 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.0

3.1 3.0 3.3 - 3.0 - 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5

30.5 31.8 31.4 - 31.3 - 30.1 31.1 32.7 30.8 30.6


3.59



96.3 96.4 96.2 94.4 - 96.7 - 94.8 96.1 95.5 95.9 97.2

5.07














3.5

3.3

3.1

3.5

4.2

3.2

3.4

3.1

3.4

3.5

3.5 3.5 4.1 - 3.5 - 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.7 3.3

3.2 3.4 3.1 - 3.3 - 3.4 3.3 3.8 3.7 3.0

2.9 3.3 3.1 - 3.1 - 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.0 3.1

3.4 3.6 3.1 - 3.5 - 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5

4.2 4.3 4.4 - 4.2 - 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.2

3.2 3.2 3.3 - 3.2 - 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.2 3.1

3.3 3.4 3.4 - 3.4 - 3.3 3.4 4.1 3.6 3.2

3.0 3.1 3.2 - 3.1 - 3.0 3.0 3.5 2.8 2.9

3.4 3.4 3.6 - 3.4 - 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.3

3.5 3.5 4.1 - 3.5 - 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.3 2.8












Bonus Points





Similar Schools








22

18

4

20

Composite

26

School Rank

30

30

30

30

30

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

30

30

30

30

30


( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

Students (% Tested) 20.7 66.2 13.89.6 95.5

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )


40.3 45.6 - - 39.4 38.6 28.8 32.8 42.8 41.5 39.1

School History


38.7

Reading

Math

43.8 - - 37.3 27.0 31.6 41.2 40.0 37.5

36.6 39.5 35.3 27.7 31.0 39.4 37.4 35.7

37.1

40.2

38.7

- 36.9 - 34.6

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

37.5 38.6 43.6 - - 35.6 28.1 31.8 42.4 40.9 36.1 39.0

35.1 39.2 33.3 24.8 28.6 36.9 35.3 35.0 - 35.1 - 33.8

34.9 40.7 33.3 25.0 27.7 37.4 35.7 34.1 - 35.1 - 32.72014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

2014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)


>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 93.3 - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Reading (%)

>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 93.3 - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Math (%)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




Proficient

Participation


Reading


Math

57.1 81.8 - 56.3 - 54.8 51.9 - 30.4 59.6 54.3

41.5 - - 40.0 - 38.9 38.8 23.1 41.3 44.4 39.1

29.1 33.3 29.1 - 25.8 26.4 9.1 11.5 27.4 28.0 30.4

4.4 - 3.0 - 5.6 2.6 .0 .0 .0 2.5 6.0

60.4

-

-

-


AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Target 61.0%

Graduation

Target 55.0%

Highest 75% (%)

Lowest 25% (%)

Highest 75% (%

Lowest 25% (%)

Target 73.7%


All White AfrAmer

Hisp Asian AmIndian


ELLSWDED

ReadingMath

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Target


Hisp Asian AmIndian

ELLSWDEDMF REP

Student Promotion


AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient


Grade 3 to Grade 4 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

Grade 5 to Grade 6 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

Grade 8 to Grade 9 (%) - - - - - - - - -- -

-

-

-


End Notes

1

2

34

5

6


3 Year Average




A

B

C

D

F

TotalPoints

Pojoaque High

Final Grade

B

Final School Grade

65.35


64.0

C

09 12-

0

25

50

75

100

Ove

rall

Po

ints

2012 2013 2014

75.0 100.0

65.0 75.0

50.0 65.0

35.0 50.0

35.0

to <

to <

to <

to <

to <0.0

Certified

1 . 6

1 2 . 5

3 . 6

6 . 0


Current Standing


8

10

10

30

PossiblePointsGrade

C

C

A

C


How well did the school help individual students improve? The highest performing students are those whose prior scores placed them in the top three quarters (75%) of their school. Individual student growth over the past 3 years is compared to the state

SchoolPoints

12.70

7.90

9.99

6.14

7 . 7

Bonus Points


College and Career ReadinessAre students prepared for what lies ahead after high school? Schools receive credit when students participate in college entrance exams, and coursework leading to dual credit and vocational certification. The school receives additional credit when students meet success goals.

1 2 . 8

9 . 0A

D

12.06

11.09 17

15

2.25

5 . 8

School Growth

10FIn the past 3 years did the school increase grade level performance? For example did this year's 10th graders improve over last year's 10th graders?

3.22


How does the school contribute to on-time graduation? On-time means within 4 years, and to a lesser extent, within 5 and 6 years for students who require longer.



Graduation

New Mexico School Grading 2014

Reading (%)

14 12 13

39 41 43

37 40 40

10 7 3

2012 2013 2014

Math (%)

11 12 17

54 60 55

3027 26

4 2 2

2012 2013 2014


Reading

Math



Current Standing






43.7 52.8 34.1 - - 44.2 - 36.4 <2.0 10.3 36.1 34.2

4.81

28.1 30.3 25.7 - - 28.0 - 23.3 4.5 3.4 23.9 26.3

3.08

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient




3 Year Summary

Advanced

Proficient

Nearing Proficient

Beginning Step

Page 2 of 7 Pojoaque HighNew Mexico School Grading 2014



School Growth

Points Earned

Math

0.503

2.47

0.024

0.75




Student Growth

-5

5

2012 2013 2014

SS P

ts p

er Y

ear

2012 2013 2014


Reading Growth

Math Growth

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

Highest 75% (SS/Yr)

Lowest 25% (SS/Yr)

Highest 75% (Pts)

Lowest 25% (Pts)

-3.5 - - -3.6 - -3.7 -3.7 - - -3.7

5.00

4.99

3.52

4.38

AllStudents


AmIndian


Studentswith

DisabilitiesEcon



EnglishProficient


Range

.7 - - .6 - .6 .6 - - .6 -3.7 .5

-2.5 - - -2.5 - -2.4 -2.5 -2.9 -2.7 -2.4 1.8 - - 1.8 - 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.6 1.9 -2.5 1.7

-3.5 - - -3.5 - -3.6 -3.6 - - -3.6 .6 - - .6 - .6 .5 - - .5 -3.5 .6

-2.5 - - -2.5 - -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.6 -2.5 1.6 - - 1.6 - 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 -2.5 1.6

10.0

11.0

Reading

Math





2.5

2.2

.6

1.6

N/A N/A







AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith


DisadvantAsianMF


Proficient

3.1

3.2

2.9

3.6

3.9

2.7

3.0

3.2

2.9

3.1

30.8

3.3 2.9 - - 3.1 - 2.9 3.1 2.7 2.7 3.2

3.4 2.9 - - 3.2 - 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1

3.0 2.7 - - 2.9 - 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.8

3.7 3.5 - - 3.6 - 3.4 3.6 3.0 3.1 3.4

4.0 3.9 - - 3.9 - 4.0 3.9 4.1 3.9 3.9

2.8 2.7 - - 2.8 - 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.7

3.2 2.9 - - 3.0 - 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.3 2.9

3.4 2.9 - - 3.2 - 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.1

3.1 2.6 - - 2.9 - 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8

3.3 2.9 - - 3.1 - 2.9 3.1 2.5 2.2 2.3

32.3 29.2 - - 30.9 - 29.3 30.8 30.5 29.3 30.1


3.16



94.4 94.7 94.2 92.4 - 94.9 - 92.2 94.1 92.0 92.5 94.8

2.98














2.7

2.5

2.6

3.0

3.6

2.4

2.5

2.2

2.5

2.7

2.7 2.7 - - 2.7 - 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.8 2.7

2.6 2.5 - - 2.6 - 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.1 2.7

2.7 2.6 - - 2.6 - 2.7 2.6 2.0 1.9 2.6

3.0 3.1 - - 3.0 - 3.3 3.0 2.4 2.2 3.0

3.6 3.5 - - 3.5 - 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.6

2.4 2.4 - - 2.4 - 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.4

2.5 2.6 - - 2.5 - 3.0 2.5 2.6 2.1 2.6

2.2 2.2 - - 2.2 - 2.3 2.4 2.3 1.9 2.2

2.5 2.5 - - 2.5 - 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.4

2.7 2.7 - - 2.7 - 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.7 1.9












Participation (% of Cohort)

Success (% of Participants)

Participation (Pts)

Success (Pts)

79.1 80.6 77.7 83.3 >98.0 82.8 >98.0 72.2 57.3 79.3 N/A 65.0

4.0

81.1 86.4 76.3 91.9 >98.0 81.2 >98.0 84.1 78.5 78.2 N/A 75.8

8.1

ACT

AccuPlacer

Advanced Placement

SAT

PLAN

PSAT

56.0 62.8 50.1 63.0 >98.0 60.3 >98.0 50.3 31.5 51.5 - 38.6

<2.0

2.3 2.6 2.1 18.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 3.5 <2.0 <2.0 - 3.0

50.0

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 -<2.0

33.1 39.4 27.5 18.0 <2.0 39.3 >98.0 28.9 9.0 30.4 - 17.0

Dual Credit

Career Technical Education

International Baccalaureate

46.6 52.1 41.8 58.5 <2.0 44.9 <2.0 47.1 48.0 48.4 - 51.1

<2.0

27.5 37.7 18.4 27.0 <2.0 32.8 <2.0 27.3 11.9 28.8 - 12.2

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 -<2.0

55.5 45.1 33.8 <2.0 55.1 >98.0 42.4 13.8 45.9 - 38.6

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 -<2.0

College and Career Readiness (CCR)

High school students are expected to participate in at least one college or career readiness program. These activities include one of the following: 1) College entrance assessments (SAT, SAT Subject Test, PSAT, ACT, PLAN, Compass, or Accuplacer) 2) Evidence that the student can pass a college level course (Advanced Placement, Dual Credit, or IB) 3) Eligibility for an industry recognized certification (Career Technical Education, SAM School Supplemental)Points are given separately for students' participation and for their success. To be considered successful students must meet established benchmarks. Details are in the School Grading Technical Guide on the PED website at http://webapp2.ped.state.nm.us/SchoolData/SchoolGrading.aspx.

CCR follows the Shared Accountability model used for cohort graduation rates. Cohorts are fully described in the Graduation Technical Manual on the PED website at http://ped.state.nm.us/Graduation/index.html.

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Compass <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 -<2.0

SAM School Supplemental <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0<2.0

SAT Subject Test <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 -<2.0

50% or Higher

20% -50%

Below 20%

Percent of School's Cohort of 2013 Participating in Each CCR Opportunity

Cohort of 2012 - 5-Year Rate



Growth in 4-Year Rates SAM Rates

GraduationStudents are expected to graduate in 4 years. However, some students require longer and are captured in 5-year and 6-year rates. Similar to School Growth, the expectation is that the school increase the percent of successful 4-year graduates over time. SAM schools (Supplemental Accountability Model) are a subset of schools that target returning dropouts or students with disabilities. These schools receive an additional rate that reflects their ability to graduate any student, not just cohort members, in a given year. Details of the federally approved graduation rules are in the Graduation Technical Manual on the PED website

Percent Graduating

Growth Index (Increase) SAM Graduation (%)

Points Earned

Points Earned

76.1 79.9 72.8 93.7 - 76.1 - 73.4 67.4 79.0 N/A 70.2

6.09

79.1 82.0 76.1 65.3 - 81.0 - 76.4 73.0 83.1 N/A 73.9

2.37

78.0 85.2 72.2 78.0 - 77.2 - 68.2 64.5 74.1 N/A 83.3

1.56

-1.9

1.07

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Percent Graduating

Points Earned

Percent Graduating

Points Earned

This school did not qualify to be a SAM school.Value Added Modeling takes into account the school's prior 3 years.


Bonus Points





Similar Schools








24

31

25

24

Composite

6

School Rank

35

35

35

35

35

34

34

34

34

34

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

34

35

35

35

35

35

35


( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

Students (% Tested) 10.0 57.6 7.17.6 97.7

Graduation 25 26 2528 20 1835 34 35353435

College and Career Readiness 7 16 2017 9 735 34 35353435

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )


Reading


Math

48.8 - - 48.2 - 40.7 43.8 - - 56.4 39.6

9.2 - - 11.1 - .0 8.0 .0 .0 6.3 11.4

34.6 - 33.9 - 35.7 31.3 - - 30.4 35.2 34.0

.0 - .0 - .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0

33.7

13.8

-

-


AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

Target 61.0%

Graduation

Target 55.0%

Highest 75% (%)

Lowest 25% (%)

Highest 75% (%

Lowest 25% (%)

Target 73.7%


All White AfrAmer

Hisp Asian AmIndian


ELLSWDED

ReadingMath

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Highest 75%

Lowest 25%

Target


Hisp Asian AmIndian

ELLSWDEDMF REP


37.9 - - - 36.9 36.7 24.9 28.4 37.8 39.8 36.0

School History


39.4

Reading

Math

42.2 - - 38.2 27.9 29.6 38.9 41.7 36.9

36.7 38.7 36.6 29.4 30.5 35.7 36.2 37.2

37.8

37.9

39.3

- 37.1 - 34.0

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

37.8 39.2 39.9 - - 35.7 28.0 29.8 40.8 41.7 37.1 40.1

35.6 39.2 34.8 25.9 28.7 35.2 36.1 35.1 - 35.5 - 34.8

34.9 - 33.7 27.0 27.1 34.5 35.3 34.5 - 34.9 - 34.62014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

2014 (Avg SS)

2013 (Avg SS)

2012 (Avg SS)

Grade 9 to Grade 10 (%)

Grade 10 to Grade 11 (%)

Student Promotion

Students that are prepared and progress to a higher grade each year (matriculate) indicate that your school is successfully moving students toward graduation. However, if the school's achievement in Reading and Math is subpar, and yet most students are being promoted, the school may be inattentive to a student's need to repeat grade-level instruction before moving on.

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




EnglishProficient

- - - - - - - - -- -

>98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 - - >98.0- >98.0

>98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 - - -- >98.0

-

-

-Grade 11 to Grade 12 (%)

The Statewide C grade was established in the first year of school grading as the midpoint of all schools. It was fixed in 2011 as the framework for all future letter grades and is not recalculated each year.Final letter grades are established at the 90th and 50th percentiles, which represent 75 and 50 points respectively. For high schools that do not have members of 4-year 5-year or 6-year graduation cohorts, the scale is abbreviated and letter grades are adjusted to account for the school's remaining non-cohort indicators or non-cohort years. However high schools that were graded on this restricted scale have their points adjusted upward to the 100 point scale in order to report 3-year averages.A dash is substituted where a school has too few students (N<10) to meet confidentiality requirements for reporting.Feeder schools are schools that do not have students in tested grades 3-8, 10, or 11. These school are rated using the performance of their alumni.Redesignated English Proficient are students that were once English Language Learners and have since become fluent. New Mexico began this reporting category in 2012 and some data systems have not yet caught up. These fields are marked with "N/A" (not yet available).During the 2013-2014 school year, schools across New Mexico piloted assessments on computers. To recognize these efforts, schools that offered the SBA on computers received bonus credit based on the number of students participating.

End Notes

1

2

3

Percent of students scoring Beginning Step (lowest) in the prior year advancing to the next grade .

4

5

6


>98.0 >98.0 97.8 - - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Reading (%)

>98.0 >98.0 >98.0 - - >98.0 - >98.0 >98.0 >98.0 ->98.0Math (%)

AllStudents

AfrAmerWhite Hisp

AmIndian


Studentswith




Proficient

Participation


pablo roybal elementary · -1.2 2.9 -1.4 2.8 - - - - -1.3 2.8 - - - - -1.3 2.8 -1.5 2.7 -1.4 2.8 -...

Documents