paint product stewardship initiative chicago, il september 20-21, 2004

Paint Product Stewardship Initiative

Chicago, IL

September 20-21, 2004

September 20-21, 2004 Chicago IL

PSI Paint Stewardship Meeting 2

Dialogue Mission

We will seek to develop voluntary

initiatives/agreements to enhance product stewardship in the paint industry by January 1, 2005



Road Map

MEETING 2

MEETING 3

MEETING 1

AGREEMENTS

START

December 2003 April 2004 June 2004 September 2004

Workgroups #1-3•Develop findings•Draft work plans

Workgroups #8-10•Develop Findings•Draft work plans

Workgroups #4-7•Develop Findings

•Draft work plans

Discuss Priority Issues and Strategies

•Groups #1-3: present findings/plans• Discuss Issues/Strategies #4-7

•Groups #4-7: present findings/plans• Discuss Issues/Strategies #8-10

MEETING 4

Review progress Ratify agreements

Dialogue Meeting

Workgroup Activity



Boston Meeting Outcomes Agreement on:

Stakeholder roles Dialogue mission Dialogue focus Dialogue purpose Problem statement Dialogue goals

Confirmed road map



Issues Discussed in Boston MA

Leftover Paint Disposal Collection (Financing)



Issues Discussed in Sacramento CA

Non-paint uses of leftover paint Sale of paint with recycled content Recycled paint manufacturing (Financing)



Issues Discussed in in Washington DC

Sorting Managing containers Transportation (Financing)



Chicago Meeting Objectives Agreement on:

MOU Project Portfolio Funding Project Portfolio and Dialogue Steering Committee Logistics Workgroup Logistics



Project Decision Criteria Is there anything in the materials that you do

not understand? Do you believe the information from this

project is critical to developing a nationally coordinated leftover paint management strategy?

Do you have objections to the proposed cost? Do you have objections to the timeline?



We Have Come a Long Way Increased understanding – all participants Increased manufacturer and retailer

involvement New relationships and spinoffs have

already begun Positions have moved A lot done in a short amount of time



Memorandum of Understanding



Process for Developing Current Draft MOU

Washington DC Finance Committee MOU Committee – full dialogue Multi-stakeholder Committee 9 drafts



Process to Finalize MOU Review Version #9 – Overview Highlight key issues to resolve Proceed section by section

Limit time on minor issues Focus on key issues

Working meeting – project on screen/edit



Process to Finalize MOU Agree on Project Portfolio Agreement at meeting on MOU Review/agreement by management outside

meeting Signature



Major Sections of MOU I. The Agreement II. Preamble III. Findings IV. Goals and Objectives V. Scope of Work Attachments

A: Project Portfolio (summary, write ups) B: Steering Committee Composition



Key Issues Already Resolved in MOU

“MOU” “nationally coordinate” vs. “national” Affirmed project goals MOU is not legally binding MOU does not waive rights and obligations

of any party



Key Issues Already Resolved in MOU

Product stewardship definition Purpose of projects Timeframe for resuming financing

discussion – 18 months Continue meeting for 2 years



Key Issues to Resolve in MOU Project Portfolio Funding for the Project Portfolio Decision point (date) on whether we need a

financing system NOT discussing decision point (date) on

TYPE of financing system needed



WORKGROUPS



Workgroups

Root Causes of Leftover Paint/Education/ Regulatory Barriers & Disincentives

Infrastructure/Reuse/Containers Markets Financing



PROJECT PORTFOLIO



Project Portfolio 22 Portfolio projects 10 Related projects All Portfolio projects to be completed

within 18 months Some projects started Some projects completed/near completion Some projects to be determined (TBD)



FUNDING PROJECTS AND THE DIALOGUE



Portfolio of Projects Total Cost =

Consultants = PSI (incl. 25% overhead) = In-kind = Contingency/future projects (15%) =



Portfolio of Projects Funding share PSI role

Staff to Steering Committee Assist in project oversight Assist project leads to report to Committee

Raise government issues from those not active in dialogue



PSI/Dialogue Facilitation Proposed services – 2 years

Meetings Steering Committee: 8 PPSI full dialogue: 4

Workgroup conference calls 4 workgroups @ 1 call/month (96 calls/2 years)

Travel Overhead: 25%

Proposed cost: $125,000/year



STEERING COMMITTEE



Criteria for Steering Committee Membership

Active participation in dialogue Time available to participate over next 2 years Ability to develop collaborative solutions Strong representative of constituent interests (not

just for own agency, company, organization) Decision makers Funders



Role of Steering Committee PSI

Staff to Steering Committee Assist in project oversight Assist project leads to report to Committee

Present recommendations to full PPSI dialogue group for decision

Review and monitor projects/provide input to workgroups

Assist with contracting out certain project work



Committee Obligations 8 Committee Meetings (4 to coincide with

PPSI full dialogue meetings) Conference calls



Steering Committee Composition

Manufacturers – 4 (NPCA 3, Dunn Edwards)

Recyclers – 1 (Amazon) Retailers – 1 (Home Depot?) State government – 3 (TBD) Local government – 2 (Recycler, TBD) Federal government –1 (EPA?)



WORKGROUP LOGISTICS



Workgroup Roles Review/monitor projects/provide input Conduct projects Assist in contracting services to complete

projects



Logistics Meeting and call frequencies Workgroup leads



MEETING WRAP UP



Next Steps

Confirm MOU process to signature Confirm workgroups and follow up Next steps for funding Next steps for steering committee Stakeholder assessment



Next Steps

Schedule next meetings/conference calls Steering Committee PPSI Dialogue

Publicity/media coverage/signing ceremony

paint product stewardship initiative chicago, il september 20-21, 2004

Documents

paint industry

leftover paintsale of

sacramento canonpaint

project portfolioagreement

project portfolio summary

overviewhighlight key

present findingsplans

minor issuesfocus