part 2 (after lunch) - iwrp...statement a: approved for public release. distribution is unlimited...

1Statement A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is unlimited (22 February 2019).

Part 2 (After Lunch)

*Lunch is available for purchase in the Kona Coast Ballroom


Topic ID Short Title

LAHAINA BAY

IWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0019Wide Band Satellite Communications On the Move (WBSOTM) System Replacement Antenna

IWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0023 ID Access Management (IdAM)IWRP-RPP-19-PAC-0024 Platinum Husky Phase 1IWRP-RPP-19-PAC-0026 Forward Manufacture of Expendable PlatformsIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0028 Automated Industrial Control System (ICS) ModelingIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0029 Ruggedized Polymer Key Metric Information (KMI) BracketIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0031 Network as a Service (NaaS)IWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0032 Navy Enterprise Service Desk (NESD)IWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0033 Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Unmanned Relay

Grand PacificIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0037 Project Schedule and AnalysisIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0038 Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)IWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0039 Remote Telescope Management

IWRP-RPP-19-PAC-0042Small Size, Weight and Power (SWaP) GPS-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing Service (GPNTS)

IWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0043 USMC Mobile Remote TowerIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0044 Visual Display System (VIDS)IWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0047 Enterprise Application Performance ManagementIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0048 GPS M-code Prototype Compatibility Analysis and SupportIWRP-RPP-19-LANT-0049 Afloat Integrated Learning Environment (AILE) c2c24 Evaluation


One-on-One Sessions Commence(Lahaina Bay & Grand Pacific Ballrooms)

Naval Information Warfare Center Atlantic

Statement A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is unlimited (22 February 2019).

Mr. Pete Vandemeulebroecke “Van”NIWC Atlantic

Program and Project Competency Lead

NIWC Atlantic is part of the Naval Research & Development Establishment (NR&DE)

5

SPAWAR Systems CommandGlobal Presence


Bahrain

Tampa FLCharleston NIWC Atlantic HQ Germany

Italy

San Diego CA SPAWAR HQ

NIWC Pacific HQ

Hampton Roads VA

New Orleans LA

Hawaii

Spain

Washington D.C

SPAWAR Systems CommandMission: SPAWAR identifies, develops, delivers and sustains information

warfighting capabilities supporting naval, joint, coalition and other national missions.Vision: Rapidly delivering cyber warfighting capability from seabed to space.

SPAWAR consists of more than 10,000 employees deployed globally and near fleet concentration areas.

Antarctica

Japan

Guam

Everett WA

Feb 2019

Partial display of SPAWAR personnel assignment locations

Chantilly VA SSFA

6

NIWC Atlantic


Mission: Serving our Nation by delivering information warfare solutions that protect national security. Includes: communication systems

(radios), networking systems (routers/switches), cyber operations (red team/forensics/ network defense), intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (sensors/decision support

applications), business systems (benefits/personnel) and information security.

Mobile C4I DoD Component Enterprise Data Center

Global Distance Support Help Desk

Ship Systems Submarine Communications

Vehicle IT Integration Ballistic Missile Defense

Feb 2019

7

Capabilities - Across the Full Life Cycle


▼ Research development and integration support developing advanced

▼ Rapidly prototype and demonstrate capabilities solving emergent Naval technology needs.

technologies ensuring Naval technology superiority for the Navy and Marines Corps.

Installation and Support Engineering, Development, Test and Evaluation Science and Technology

TodayThe Navy in Operation

TomorrowThe Navy in Construction

FutureThe Navy in Planning

▼ Engineer C4ISR capabilities for critical tactical systems:- CANES, Computer Network

Defense systems, Cryptologic Carry-On Program, SSEE, Software Defined Radios

- end-to-end C4ISR systems in tactical vehicles

▼ Integrate and Install modernized C4ISR systems into ships, submarines and supporting shore stations

▼ Engineer and support satellite and inertial navigation systems

▼ Technology assessments on combatant crafts for future AAVs. SOCOM combatant craft navigation development

Service Academies Swarm ChallengeAmphibious Assault

Vehicle (AAV)

▼ Network Integration & Engineering Facility (NIEF)

▼ Networks and Satellite Communication Gateways

▼ Urban 5th Generation Marine Advanced Naval Tech Exercise demonstrations

Next Gen narrowband satellite communication system, the Mobile User Objective System



Mr. Vince SquitieriNIWC Pacific

Communications and Networks Deputy Department Head

Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific

NIWC Pacific is part of the Naval Research & Development Establishment (NR&DE)

9

NIWC Pacific Mission


From concept to capability via…

…research, development, engineering and support of integrated C4ISR, cyber and space systems across all warfighting domains and to rapidly prototype, conduct test and

evaluation, and provide acquisition, installation and in-service engineering support.

10

NWIC Pacific Capabilities - Across the Full Life Cycle


Installation and Support Engineering, Development, Test and Evaluation Science and Technology

TodayThe Navy in Operation

TomorrowThe Navy in Construction

FutureThe Navy in Planning

Nano Satellites

C4ISR for Unmanned Vehicles

Mixed Reality

Cryogenic Exploitation of RF

Marine Mammals

Production, InstallationIn-Service Support

.

Advanced Antenna ResearchUser Center Design3D Printing/ AM Integrated Cyber

Operations Human Machine

TeamingCyber Security

NetworksIntegrated Fires

FDECO

Graphene

Biologically-Inspired Autonomous Sensing

Space Command & Control

Collaborative Software Armory


Information Warfare Research Project(IWRP)


Mr. Don SalleeNIWC Atlantic

IWRP Program Manager

NIWC Atlantic is part of the Naval Research & Development Establishment (NR&DE)


IWRP

13

IWRP Scope and Execution Process


IWRP is an opportunity for the consortium members to identify research topics in addition to

government identified research topics

Cyber Warfare

Data Science/Analytics Technologies

Assured Communications

Cloud Computing

Enterprise Resource Tools

Collaboration and Social Networking

Autonomy

Internet of Things (IoT) Embedded Systems

Mobility

Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)

On-Demand Manufacturing

Technologies that would enable and improve Assured Command and Control (AC2)

Technologies that would enable or improve Battlespace Awareness

Technologies that would enable or improve Integrated Fires

IWRP Technology Areas

IWRP

14

Other Transaction Authority


15

Definitions of Prototype

▼ A prototype project may involve: a proof of concept a pilot a novel application of commercial technologies for defense

purposes a creation, design, development, demonstration of technical or

operational utility; or combinations of the foregoing, related to a prototype

▼ The quantity should generally be limited to that needed to prove technical or manufacturing feasibility or evaluate military utility


17

OTA 101 Overview &Consortium Member BIDS

Training

Consortium Based Other Transaction Agreement

Terminology

OTA – Other Transaction Agreement CM – Consortium Manager AO – Agreements Officer AOR – Agreement Officer Representative RPP – Request for Prototype Project BA – Base Agreement PPA – Prototype Project Agreement

19

OTA Authority “2371b” for Prototypes

20

Under the authority of 10 U.S.C. section 2371b, the Department of Defense has authority to carry out prototype projects that are: directly relevant to enhancing the mission effectiveness of

military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or

to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the armed forces.

Consortium OTA Basics

An “enterprise partnership” between the Government and a consortium of technology developers/providers in a specific domain where…. The “Government” partner can be a single sponsor (program

executive officer) or multiple sponsors coordinated through a lead agency

The “Consortium” partner is a group of for-profit, not-for-profit, universities and other academic research organizations having competence in the technical domain of interest

The parties are connected through a binding “contract - like” instrument called an “Other Transaction” that operates outside the normal Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)

21

Rationale for Using an OTA

Generally, the reason for using OT authority is that the Government needs to obtain leading edge prototype R&D from commercial sources, but some organizations are unwilling or unable to comply with the Government’s procurement regulations

By using an OT instead of a contract, an agency and its partners are able to develop a flexible arrangement tailored to the project and the needs of the participants:

Additionally OTAs promote “a more collaborative working relationship,” which can be more conducive to R&D than the type of relationship established by a contract.

Source: L. Elaine Halchin - CRS Report to Congress, July 2011 22

What’s Different from the FAR?

What does not apply under an OT? Competition in Contracting Act IP rights can differ Truth in Negotiations Act Contract Disputes Act Procurement Protest System DoD Grants and Agreements Regulations (DODGARS) Cost Accounting Standards for nontraditional Award Recipients

Relief from FAR and supplemental regulations Not required to comply with all of the FAR, DFARS

Flexibility to use “best practices” Costs reasonable, but still requires due diligence to award

federal dollars Schedule and other requirements are enforceable Payment arrangements promote on-time performance

23

Relationship of Parties

Government Control Selects projects and approvestheir

costs/milestones, etc. Approves and modify theSOW Provides technical oversight Approves deliverables prior to payment Redirects or cancels any project not

meeting expectation / requirements Conducts project / program reviews Stage-gate decisions Sets terms andconditions

Funding Sponsor(SPAWAR/NIWC)

Other Transaction Agreement

NIWC AO

IWRP Consortium

Manager(ATI)

BaseAgreements

$$

Sub-Agreements

IWRP Consortium

Membership Agreement

Member, MemberMember, MemberMember, MemberMember, MemberMember, Member

Individual Member Prototype Project

AgreementsAOR

24

IWRP

Authority/Requirements Nontraditional Defense Contractors Significant Participation Cost Share Intellectual Property Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Collaboration Key Documents

Important Topics

25

Use of Authority/Requirements

Significant participation of at least one nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution in the prototype project

At least one third of the total cost of the prototype project is to be paid out of funds provided by parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government (cost share)

All significant participants in the transaction other than the Federal Government are small businesses or nontraditional defense contractors

Senior procurement executive approves due to need for innovative business arrangements or structures

26

Nontraditional Defense ContractorDefinition

An entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the issue date of the solicitation, any contract or subcontract for the Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards (CAS)prescribed pursuant to Section 1502 of Title 41 and the regulations implementing such section

27

Are you a Nontraditional?

Small businesses are not subject to full CAS and therefore are considered nontraditionals

Large business NOT subject to full CAS are considered nontraditionals

Ultimately each member must self-certify status The prior definition should be used to determine if you

qualify Other Transaction Information form when proposing

NAICS Code for the OTA is: 541715

28

Nontraditional Defense Contractor

A nontraditional defense contractor (NDC) can be: At the Prime level Subcontractors Teammembers “Intra-company” business units Lower tier vendors Teaming partners don’t have to be IWRP Consortium

members, but are encouraged to join the consortium

29

Significant Contribution

Rationale to justify a significant contributioninclude: Supplying a key technology or products Accomplishing a significant amount of the effort Causing a material reduction in cost or schedule,

and/or Improvement in performance

Government is the final determination of significant contribution.

30

Cost Share

Without significant participation of a nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution, project can still be awarded under OTA if 1/3 of the project cost is provided as cost share unless the specific RPP states otherwise.

Cost sharing: Cash or in-kind resources expended during a prototype award by the Consortium Member or lower tier subcontractors that are necessary and reasonable for accomplishment of the project.

31

Cost Share Requirements

Cash: Outlays of funds to perform the SOW. Cash includes labor, materials, new equipment, and relevant subcontractor efforts. Sources include new IR&D funds, profit or fee from another contract, overhead or capital equipment expense pool. New IR&D funds offered to be spent on the Statement of Work and subject to the direction of the project’s management may be utilized as cost share.

In-Kind: Reasonable value of in-place equipment, materials or other property used in performance of the project.

32

Cost Share Requirements

Additional Cost Share requirements Must be verifiable from financial records Must not be included as a cost sharing contribution

for any other Federal Government contract vehicle. Cost Share cannot be paid by the Federal

Government under another contract vehicle, except IR&D

Sunk costs or costs incurred before the start of the proposed project, foregone fees or profits, bid and proposal costs, value claimed for intellectual property or prior research, parallel research or investment

33

Intellectual Property

Data and Patent Rights covered in the Base Agreement

Negotiable – Members assert rights in proposals Neither CM nor Consortium have any rights to

Members intellectual property CM will assist Members with the reporting of

subject inventions, the proper use of data rights assertions, and the proper use of data rights legends on deliverables

34

Organizational Conflict of Interest

OCI clause requires Consortium to monitor all potential conflicts of interest

Ensure prototype-level performance does not conflict with other agreements or contracts

All white papers and proposals will address potential conflicts of interest and any proposed mitigation.

Right of Government to limit Consortium Member Entity(ies)' involvement under this Agreement

Mitigation plan may be acceptable on case-by-case basis.

35

Collaboration OTAs afford flexibility in communication between Gov’t and

Industry Prior to solicitation release During white paper and full proposal development, until

the RPP closes

Networking with Gov’t and IWRP Consortium members Webinars General Membership Meetings Industry Days, including Opportunities for 1-on-1 meetings

Other IWRP Consortium Communication Up-to-date information through email and the forward-facing and members-only websites

36

Key Documents

IWRP Consortium Base Agreement Between ATI and IWRP Consortium member organization Serves as baseline agreement for all future project agreements Flows down applicable T&Cs from OTA between Gov’t and IWRP Government does not intend to negotiate different terms with

each IWRP Consortium member so negotiations limited and applicable to all members

IWRP Consortium Project Agreement Issued by ATI to member under Base Agreement Result of Government selection and funding on OTA Government retains technical oversite Defines the particulars of the awarded project Includes IP, data right assertions, SOW, milestones, payment

instructions, etc.37

Project Solicitation & Proposal Submission Process

Process Overview

39

Consortium Manager

via BIDS

Solicitations and Submission

Requests for Prototype Projects (RPPs) Government defines each topic, to include technical

requirements The RPP contains proposal preparation instructions and

indicates process to be used (i.e. White Paper to Full Proposal)

Proposers Conference ATI offers webinar to address proposal preparation

Submission Submissions via secure upload to ATI for compliance screening ATI distributes submissions to government for source selection

40

RPP Release

RPPs, any amendments, and supplementary information can be found in the Solicitations tab of the IWRP Members Only website. The Members Only site is the official source of

information regarding active solicitations The IWRP Consortium Manager will revise official

guidance (if required) and post any such revisions on the Members Only web site. One Stop Shopping, except for classified attachments

41

Proposal Selection The Government may: Select the proposal for award; Place the proposal in the Basket if funding currently is

unavailable; or Reject the proposal (it will not be placed in the Basket).

Basket Provision The Government reserves to the right to consider prototype

project submissions for up to 18 months after submission. May be funded at any time during the 18-month period after

the Government has reconfirmed validity of the submission.

42

IWRP Contact Information

General Assistance or [email protected]

Contract or Proposal Related [email protected]

43

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

BIDSProposal and Evaluation

Management System

44

What is BIDS?

• AcqCenter’s BAA Information Delivery System (BIDS)

• BIDS is a web accessible, secure, fully automated and paperless solicitation management application

• Members respond to solicitations via BIDS• Government evaluates via BIDS• Feedback to Members is provided via BIDS

45

What will BIDS Replace?

• Online submission forms for proposal submittal• Government evaluation forms • Feedback letters• Note: Classified data will not submitted via BIDS

46

General Process

• Members• Create an account by clicking on New Registration• Complete basic submission information• Upload required documents/volumes per the solicitation• Receive confirmation emails on successful submission • Once available, the submitter will be able to login to review

feedback

• Government• Individual Technical and then Consensus evaluations are completed• Acquisition and Legal review, provide comments, verify• Acquisition approves final source selection documentation

47

BIDS Interfaces With All Stakeholders

Product Submission

Technical Evaluation

ConsensusContracting Approval

SubmitterNotification

Contracting and Legal

IWRP Members

Government Technical Experts

Government Managers

48

Why Members Will Like BIDS

• Quickly get detailed information about requirement listings

• Registering process takes less than 5 minutes

• Submission form is simple and easy to fill out

• Check submission status at anytime

• Online Help, FAQs and email support available

49

Why Evaluators Will Like BIDS

• Automated notification emails• “To Do List” shows what needs attention• Submissions reviewable online• Pick lists and radio buttons speed evaluations• Previous evaluations are available for reference

50

Other Key Features and Benefits of BIDS• Solid Security

All data transmitted via encryption over SSLSupport for X.509 (Public Key Certificates for Secure Browsing)Granular access assigned by userMulti-Factor Authentication

• Scalable and adaptable to support any size or type source selection effort

• Provides a data warehouse that is quickly queried, rapidly enhanced and easily archived

• Green (paperless) solution• Stable and mature COTS application

51

Training

• Intuitive user interfaces reduces learning curve• Application screens have a consistent “look and feel”• Online training and “Quick Card” available• Submitting via BIDS training will be provided as part of

Proposer Conferences • Separate Training provided to government evaluation

teams

52

Next Steps

• BIDS will be used for RPPs as of 20 February 2019

• IWRP BIDS site is now live and account creation information will be released, to include a submitter “Quick Card”

53

54

Networking Break

55

Open Networking

56

Adjourn

57

Quarterly Industry Day