participatory mapping in pune

35
CANDELA SANCHEZ [email protected] PARTICIPATORY MAPPING IN PUNE’S SLUMS - INDIA

Upload: candelasre

Post on 16-Jul-2015

346 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Participatory mapping in pune

C A N D E L A S A N C H E Z C A N D E L A . S R E @ G M A I L . C O M

PARTICIPATORY MAPPING IN PUNE’S SLUMS - INDIA

Page 2: Participatory mapping in pune

CO

NT

EN

TS

• Ambitions of Research

• Overview of the Area

• Partners and Participants

• Mapping Shankar Maharaj

• Challenges

• Observations

Page 3: Participatory mapping in pune

1. AMBITIONS OF RESEARCH

Aims

• To further understanding of the

feasibility and limitations of

using VGI and Web 2.0

technologies to map slums in

India.

• To further understanding of the

political, social and technical

impediments of participatory

mapping and the ability this

has to empower slum

communities.

Page 4: Participatory mapping in pune

1. AMBITIONS OF RESEARCH

Objectives

1. Participatory Mapping

2. Mapping: what for?

GeoreferencedSMS Reports

3. Project based on (1) and (2):

Crowdmap

4. Empowerment,

really?

Page 5: Participatory mapping in pune

2. OVERVIEW OF THE AREA

1: 54500

Source: Source: Mapbox (TileMill) on the left and OpenStreetMap on the right.

Page 6: Participatory mapping in pune

2. SHANKAR MAHARAJ

Source: OpenStreetMap (left) and google maps (right).

Page 7: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 8: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 9: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 10: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 11: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 12: Participatory mapping in pune

3. PARTNERS AND PARTICIPANTS

Partners: Mashal NGO

• MASHAL (Maharashtra Social Housing and Action League) – founded in 1985.

• NGO based in Pune which works in partnership with Pune Municipal Corporation to implement Slum Rehabilitation Projects.

• Pune Slum Atlas

Page 13: Participatory mapping in pune

3. PARTNERS AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants: Shankar Maharaj

• Around 15-20 people came to the general meetings we had at Shankar Maharaj.

• 2 people volunteered to map Shankar Maharaj

• 13 women volunteered to send SMS reports

Page 14: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 15: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 16: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 17: Participatory mapping in pune

4. MAPPING SHANKAR MAHARAJ

1. Initial Phase: Meetings (Mashal and Shankar Maharaj)

2. Mapping:

a. Recording Tracks and POIs

b. OSM

3. Crowdmap and FrontlineSMS

4. Final Phase: SMS Reports

Page 18: Participatory mapping in pune

4. MAPPING SHANKAR MAHARAJ

1. Initial Phase: Meetings

2. Mapping:

a. Recording Tracks and POIs

b. OSM

3. Crowdmap and FrontlineSMS

4. Final Phase: SMS Reports

Page 19: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 20: Participatory mapping in pune

4. MAPPING SHANKAR MAHARAJ

1. Initial Phase: Meetings

2. Mapping:

a. Recording Tracks and POIs

b. OSM

3. Crowdmap and FrontlineSMS

4. Final Phase: SMS Reports

Page 21: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 22: Participatory mapping in pune

4. MAPPING SHANKAR MAHARAJ

1. Initial Phase: Meetings

2. Mapping:

a. Recording Tracks and POIs

b. OSM

3. Crowdmap and FrontlineSMS

4. Final Phase: SMS Reports

Page 23: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 24: Participatory mapping in pune

4. MAPPING SHANKAR MAHARAJ

1. Initial Phase: Meetings

2. Mapping:

a. Recording Tracks and POIs

b. OSM

3. Crowdmap and FrontlineSMS

4. Final Phase: SMS Reports

Page 25: Participatory mapping in pune

5. CHALLENGES

Challenges

Technical

PoliticalSocial

Page 26: Participatory mapping in pune

5. CHALLENGES

Technical

• (very) Narrow streets and weak GPS signal

• Tags given with QGIS/JOSM were not recognised after uploading

data to OSM (Potlatch tagging)

• Lack in the range of tags recognised by OSM

• Not enough “resolution” in OSM

• SMS: Language

Page 27: Participatory mapping in pune
Page 28: Participatory mapping in pune

4. CHALLENGES

Technical

• (very) Narrow streets and weak GPS signal

• Tags given with QGIS/JOSM were not recognised after uploading

data to OSM (Potlatch tagging)

• Lack in the range of tags recognised by OSM

• Not enough “resolution” in OSM

• SMS: Language

Page 29: Participatory mapping in pune

• 38 POIs were recorded

• 21 show on the OSM map

Page 30: Participatory mapping in pune

4. CHALLENGES

Technical

• (very) Narrow streets and weak GPS signal

• Tags given with QGIS/JOSM were not recognised after uploading

data to OSM (Potlatch tagging)

• Lack in the range of tags recognised by OSM

• Not enough “resolution” in OSM

• SMS: Language

Page 31: Participatory mapping in pune

4. CHALLENGES

Social

• Language

• Difficult and very time consuming to organise meetings in Shankar

Maharaj

• Difficult to gain the trust of the community

• Maps – what for?

• Who actually benefits from participatory mapping?

Page 32: Participatory mapping in pune

4. CHALLENGES

Political

• Opposition from Local Government (PMC)

• Opposition from Area Corporators

• SMS were banned by the National Government due to protests and

riots in Pune and Mumbai

Page 33: Participatory mapping in pune

5. OBSERVATIONS

• Digital Divide: Wide access to mobile phones and few people

have computers at their houses.

• Community Participation: Time

• Empowerment does not exist as a concept?

• “Participation is still dependency”

• Data boom – no room for “qualitative” information?

• Participatory Mapping unsustainable?

Page 34: Participatory mapping in pune

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to especially thank Robin McLaren for sponsoring this

project and for his academic support. I would also like to thank

William Mackaness for his enthusiasm and great support.

Finally, I am extremely grateful to MASHAL and the people of Shankar

Maharaj for welcoming me and allowing me to work with them.

Page 35: Participatory mapping in pune