partners for healthy lifestyles
DESCRIPTION
Working Today For A Healthier Tomorrow. Piedmont Health District. PARTNERS FOR HEALTHY LIFESTYLES. Barbara Jackson-Marshall RN, MPH, CHES Assistant Director For Prevention Programs Tim Powell, MPHMark Levine, MD, MPH EpidemiologistDistrict Health Director - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PARTNERS FOR HEALTHY LIFESTYLES
Barbara Jackson-Marshall RN, MPH, CHES
Assistant Director For Prevention Programs
Tim Powell, MPH Mark Levine, MD, MPH
Epidemiologist District Health Director
Piedmont Health District/Virginia Department of Health
Farmville, VA
VIRGINIA & PIEDMONT HEALTH DISTRICT
PIEDMONT DEMOGRAPHICS• Seven counties, of approximately 2830 square
miles, with a total population of 97,103. – 34.3 persons per square mile.
• 36 percent of Piedmont residents are African American, and 2 percent are of other non-white race.
• Average median household income for the district is $31,563.– 17.2 percent of residents live below the poverty level. – Unemployment rate of 4.7 in 2002.
• All 7 counties listed as Medically Underserved Areas, 5 as Healthcare Provider Shortage Areas.
Demographics Cont.
• 30.1 percent of Piedmont residents suffer from obesity, an estimated 22,592 persons.
• 8.6 percent of Piedmont adults suffer from diagnosed diabetes, an estimated 6,455 persons.
RATIONALE CVD is a significant public health concern in our
rural health community. Compared to the state and nation, these residents
are more likely to be poor, African American, and have difficulty accessing medical care.
African-Americans in Piedmont are significantly more likely than whites to be overweight, poor, and have sedentary lifestyles.
African-Americans have higher rates of mortality from chronic diseases, particularly cardiovascular disease.
RATIONALE
The health disparities are wider than that of Virginia and the United States.
The Church serves as both the principal meeting area and key motivator for change amongst Piedmont’s African-American adult population.
PARTNERS FOR HEALTHY LIFESTYLES 2000
The District investigated whether a faith-based intervention could
reduce cardiovascular risk factors.
GOAL: INCREASE HEALTHY YEARS OF LIFE
OBJECTIVE:
To educate and support participants to change, improve and maintain healthy behaviors by reducing fat intake and increasing physical activity to 3 days a
week for at least 20 minutes a day.
*Note: This has changed to 5 days a week for at least 30 minutes a day.
METHOD• Phase I - Introduction
Form partnerships with African American churches within the health district.
Churches were recruited to participate in the PHL program. Selected and trained volunteer Lay Health Workers (LHW)
to facilitate the church meetings and assist with collecting data, monitoring progress, and serve as the “motivator”.
Participants enrolled and frequency and dates for meeting times established.
Establish Buddy system. Baseline data collected and self reported medical history
taken.
INDICATORS
Church participation ( minimum of 12 participants) – family is encouraged to attend
Body Mass Index Waist circumference Dietary fat intake - self report form Physical activity level – self report log
METHOD• Phase II - Education intervention on Cardio-
vascular Risk factors Nutrition – “Managing Soul Food” “Praisercise” – engage participants in physical
activity and walking to gospel music Gospel Aerobics” soft aerobics at weekly meetings Attempted to overcome cultural dietary and exercise
norms Other Risk factors – Hypertension, Cholesterol,
Diabetes
Phase II continued
Subject chosen by participants Sharing Activity - Engaged the participants into a
“mind set” that CVD is a significant health issue and that its effects are modifiable.
Introduced to monitoring/tracking logs for physical activity, dietary fat intake and Personal Commitment Goal
Incentives were used as motivators for successes at intervals and for completion of the program.
METHOD
• Phase III - Maintenance Period Participants record their dietary fat intake and
physical activity weekly LHW collects data, supports and motivates
participants to decrease fat intake and increase physical activity
District program manager and part time program coordinator worked with the LHW
Change In Cardiovascular RisksBMI, PHD 2000
65%
22%
13%
79%
17%
8%
38% 38%
25%
58%
47%
11%
60%
10%
30%
63%
20%17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Church of
Christ
Sharon
Baptist
High Rock Gravel Hill Bible Way All
Churches
Decreased No Change Increased
Change in Cardiovascular RisksWaist (inches), PHD 2000
78%
17%
4%
92%
0%8%
88%
0%
13%
95%
5%0%
50%
10%
40%
83%
7% 10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Church of
Christ
Sharon
Baptist
High Rock Gravel Hill Bible Way All
Churches
Decreased No Change Increased
Change In Cardiovascular RisksDietary fat (%calories), PHD 2000
78%
13%9%
96%
0% 4%
100%
0% 0%
95%
0% 5%
70%
20%
10%
88%
6% 6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Church of
Christ
Sharon
Baptist
High Rock Gravel Hill Bible Way All
Churches
Decreased No Change Increased
Change In Cardiovascular RisksExercise (> 20 minutes/day,3 days/week),
PHD 2000
4%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
90%
1%
99%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Church of
Christ
Sharon
Baptist
High Rock Gravel Hill Bible Way All
Churches
Baseline Follow-up
FY 2000 Church Locations
FY 2000-2003 Church Locations
BARRIERS/CHALLENGES Isolation Small church congregations Lack of Interest Difficulty conceptualizing the relationship between
church and personal health Establishing trust and credibility Rural setting – lack of public transportation Collaboration among churches was complicated Pastors do not live in the community. The Pastor may
minister more than one church. Sustainability – LHW were trained to continue the
program the following year. Pastors supported continuing the program.
Practices that created a spiritual basis, spiritual support, spiritual guidance, fellow encouragement,
and helped participants accept, but into, and perceive long term changes to improve
personal/family health behaviors. Courtship” with churches during the months of
June – August. District and the Church identified scriptures that
connected the principles of the program to the individual church doctrine.
“M & M Break” “Motivation & Meditation Break” - “affirmation” of good health and healthy body which stemmed from one of the scriptures.
“ Prayer Partner” – support person
LESSONS LEARNED
Importance of meeting people “where they are”. Listen - Enter the individual church with the approach
of “how can I help you” and paying attention to the health/needs of the individual congregation.
Get the Pastor’s sanction and members want him and/or his wife actively involved in the program.
Operate within the culture and practices of each individual church/faith-based organization.
Establish trust and credibility Don’t promise something that you can’t deliver. Open and honest communication.
SUSTAINABILITY LHW were trained to continue the program the
following year. Pastors supported continuing the program
Overcome funding decreases by expanding the partnerships to local organizations to promote centralized locations.
Work with local schools and fitness centers to provide community opportunity for physical activity
Get community support to expand the program, get a champion and/or advocates for the program
Seek other grant funding
Keys To Success As Reported by the Focus Group Belief in the methods Belief in the connection between health and religion Good health is determined by behavior change and
consistency The body is sacred; take care of it through good
nutrition and eating habits Monitoring food intake is more important that
dieting (fads) Weight control and exercising/physical activity
require persistence and consistency The PHL program can result in life long or long
term outcomes
• Healthy bodies come in all sizes
CONCLUSION
FAITH- BASED INTERVENTIONS ARE A COMPELLING AND POWERFUL FORCE OF LIFESTYLE BEHAVIOR CHANGE IN
RURAL AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITIES
Change in Average Weight by Year, Partners for Healthy Lifestyles Program,Piedmont Health District
-1.6%
-4.9%
-2.1%
-1.8%
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
Poun
ds
Baseline 200.8 188.1 210.9 203.1
Follow-up 197.3 184.1 200.4 199.7
2000 2001 2002 2003
Change in Average Body Mass Index by Year,Partners for Healthy Lifestyles Program,
Piedmont Health District-3.4%-6.3%
-3.2%
-1.8%
27.0
28.0
29.0
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
34.0
35.0
36.0
Bod
y M
ass
Inde
x
Baseline 33.2 31.0 34.9 35.0
Follow-up 32.6 30.0 32.7 33.8
2000 2001 2002 2003
Change in Average Waist Inches by Year, Partners for Healthy Lifestyles Program, Piedmont Health District
-2.9%
-3.2%
-3.7%-4.4%
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Inch
es
Baseline 38.4 38.2 40.2 41.8
Follow-up 36.7 36.8 38.9 40.6
2000 2001 2002 2003