passenger facility charge application #1 county airport authority (ccaa) punta gorda airport (pgd)...

Passenger Facility Charge Application #1

February 2017

APPLICATION

PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT PFC ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

The undersigned Chair of the Charlotte County Airport Authority assures and certifies, with respect to the PFC application and projects including each individual project work element submitted in its application to impose a PFC at the Punta Gorda Airport: 1) Responsibility and authority of the public agency. It has legal authority to impose a PFC and to finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the public agency’s governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the public agency to act in connection with the application. 2) Compliance with regulation. It will comply with all provisions of 14 CFR Part 158. 3) Compliance with state and local laws and regulations. It has complied, or will comply, with all applicable State and local laws and regulations. 4) Environmental, airspace and airport layout plan requirements. It will not use PFC revenue on a project until the FAA has notified the public agency that:

a) Any actions required under the National Environmental Policy act of 1969 have been completed;

b) The appropriate airspace finding has been made; and

c) The FAA Airport Layout Plan (ALP) with respect to the project has been approved. 5) Nonexclusivity of contractual agreements. It will not enter into any exclusive long-term lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for projects funded with PFC revenue. Such leases or use agreements will not preclude the public agency from funding, developing, or assigning new capacity at the airport with PFC revenue. 6) Carryover provisions. It will not enter into any lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for a facility financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC if such agreement for such facility contains a carryover provision regarding a renewal option which, upon expiration of the original lease, would operate to automatically extend the term of such agreement with such carrier in preference to any potentially competing air carrier or foreign air carrier seeking to negotiate a lease or use agreement for such facilities. 7) Competitive access. It agrees that any lease or use agreement between the public agency and any air carrier or foreign air carrier for any facility financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC will contain a provision that permits a public agency to terminate the lease or use agreement if:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY (CCAA)PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT (PGD)CIP ANALYSIS

PROJECT COST FAA FDOTCCAA

FUNDED SIB FUNDED TOTAL

Estimated Entitlement Funds$2,531,906

FBO DESIGN 2016 250,000 125,000 125,000 250,000

MASTER PLAN 2016 1,100,000 990,000 55,000 55,000 1,100,000

GA Apron / TW Design / Construct 2016 3,000,000 2,700,000 150,000 150,000 3,000,000

PARKING LOT EXIT 2016 350,000 175,000 175,000 350,000

New 100 space Lot Equipment 2016 120,000 60,000 60,000

100 Spaces Parking Lot 2016 350,000 100,000 100,000 200,000

5,170,000 3,960,000 665,000 665,000 4,850,000

Estimated Entitlement Funds$2,953,600

TERMINAL APRON CONSTRUCT 2017 1,330,000 1,197,000 66,500 66,500 1,330,000

TERMINAL / APRON DESIGN 2016 300,000 270,000 15,000 15,000 300,000

FBO 2017 2,400,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 2,400,000

4,030,000 1,467,000 1,281,500 81,500 1,200,000 4,030,000

$2,340,000 Entitlement FundsNORTHRAMP Overlay / Seal 2018 1,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000

1,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000

$2,340,000 Entitlement FundsSOUTHRAMP Overlay / Seal 2019 1,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000

MAINTENANCE FACILITY 2019 500,000 250,000 250,000 500,000

2,000,000 1,350,000 325,000 325,000 2,000,000

$2,340,000 Entitlement FundsRW 4‐22 ‐ OVERLAY 2020 3,000,000 2,700,000 150,000 150,000 3,000,000

3,000,000 2,700,000 150,000 150,000 3,000,000

MAINTENANCE FACILITY 2021 500,000 250,000 250,000 500,000

Perimeter Road Phase 1 2021 2,500,000 2,250,000 125,000 125,000 2,500,000

Construct Customs Facility 2021 750,000 375,000 375,000 750,000

RW 15‐33 OVERLAY 2022 2,250,000 2,025,000 112,500 112,500 2,250,000

9/27 Convert to TW H 2023 4,000,000 3,600,000 200,000 200,000 4,000,000

Perimeter Road Phase 2 2024 2,500,000 2,250,000 125,000 125,000 2,500,000

RW 4‐22 Ext EA 2025 600,000 540,000 30,000 30,000 600,000

Design and Construct 22 End ext 2026 2,105,400 1,894,860 105,270 105,270 2,105,400

Purchase Mitigation Credits 2026 1,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000

TW D Rehab 2027 2,000,000 1,800,000 100,000 100,000 2,000,000

PARKING LOT EXPANSION (WHEN NEEDED) 800,000 400,000 400,000 800,000

19,505,400 15,709,860 1,897,770 1,897,770 19,505,400

35,205,400 35,205,400 4,394,270 3,194,270 1,200,000 35,205,400

PROJECT INFORMATION/

ATTACHMENT Bs

Project 01-001 - Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 2. Project Number: 01-001 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $131,966 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-022-2008)

Pay-as-you-go $19,795 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-024-2008) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $151,761 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-022-2008 $2,507,364 3-12-0067-024-2008 $376,104 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $2,883,468 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0


Revised 8/31/2010

Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $3,035,229 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12” portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG-III standards. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.


Revised 8/31/2010

How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance the capacity of the Airport by providing an aircraft parking apron of sufficient strength for the size and weight of commercial aircraft now utilizing the Airport. It will also enhance capacity by ensuring that the aircraft parking apron is in proper condition for aircraft operations and to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139, Certification of Airports. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition


Revised 8/31/2010

benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2008 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): July 2009 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:


Revised 8/31/2010

For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 01-002 - Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 2. Project Number: 01-002 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50


Pay-as-you-go $1,791 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-025-2009) Pay-as-you-go $3,176 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-028-2009) Pay-as-you-go $13,158 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-029-2010) Pay-as-you-go $13,158 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-030-2010) Pay-as-you-go $6,971 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-031-2011)

Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $41,181 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-023-2008 $111,240

3-12-0067-025-2009 $68,073 3-12-0067-028-2009 $120,687 3-12-0067-029-2010 $500,000 3-12-0067-030-2010 $500,000 3-12-0067-031-2011 $264,877


Revised 8/31/2010

Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $1,564,877 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $41,181 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $41,181 Total Project Cost: $1,647,239 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway 03-21 to Runway 04-22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7” of asphalt. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters:


Revised 8/31/2010

Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ]


Revised 8/31/2010

Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance safety at the Airport by reducing the potential for aircraft collision at the intersection of Runways 04 and 33. It will also enhance safety by reducing the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors and to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139, Certification of Airports. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport’s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access


Revised 8/31/2010

Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): October 2007


Revised 8/31/2010

Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2007 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________


Revised 8/31/2010

Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 1.02 – Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension

Before

After

Project 01-003 - Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 2. Project Number: 01-003 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $83,533 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-026-2009) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $83,533 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-026-2009 $2,390,250 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $2,390,250 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $42,280


Revised 8/31/2010

Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $42,280 Total Project Cost: $2,516,063 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40’ wide and were widened to 60’ wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4” of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE


Revised 8/31/2010

Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?


Revised 8/31/2010

If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance the capacity of the Airport by providing taxiway access to and from Runway 04/22 of sufficient strength for the size and weight of commercial aircraft now utilizing the Airport. It will also enhance safety by eliminating the need of commercial service aircraft to back taxi on the runway. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway 04-22. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.


Revised 8/31/2010

Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2009 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): February 2010 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain.


Revised 8/31/2010

13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.


Revised 8/31/2010

If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 01-004 - Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment 2. Project Number: 01-004 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50


Pay-as-you-go $26,249 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-033-2014) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $54,412 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-031-2011 $535,101 3-12-0067-033-2014 $472,478 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $1,007,579 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0


Revised 8/31/2010

State Grants $26,248 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $26,248 Total Project Cost: $1,088,239 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport’s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500-gallon water tanks and s 205-gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA8371001833. The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 – a 2014 E-One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE1008879. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules.


Revised 8/31/2010

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance safety by ensuring that the Airport has the equipment necessary for the proper level of aircraft rescue and fire fighting based on the size of aircraft utilizing the Airport. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/5220-10, Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition


Revised 8/31/2010

benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): January 2008 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): March 2015 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:


Revised 8/31/2010

For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 01-005 - Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 2. Project Number: 01-005 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $4,540 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-031-2011) Pay-as-you-go $51,500 (100% of third lift device) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $56,040 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-031-2011 $86,260 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $86,260 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds:


Revised 8/31/2010

State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $142,300 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD-80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/5360-14 and 150/5220-21B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE


Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance capacity by providing a means of passenger enplaning and deplaning which is safe and efficient. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.


Revised 8/31/2010

Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use


Revised 8/31/2010

Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.)


Revised 8/31/2010

ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 01-006 - Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension 2. Project Number: 01-006 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $3,304 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-031-2011) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $3,304 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-031-2011 $62,769 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $62,769 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $


Revised 8/31/2010

Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $66,073 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project 01-002 above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.


Revised 8/31/2010

If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport.


Revised 8/31/2010

10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity and safety at the Airport by providing additional runway takeoff and landing distances for aircraft utilizing Runway 04/22. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension. Conversion of this lead-in taxiway to active runway pavement increased the total length of Runway 04/22 to 7,195 feet. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or


Revised 8/31/2010

PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2010 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No


Revised 8/31/2010

Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects.


Revised 8/31/2010

If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 1.06 – Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension

Before

After

Project 01-007 - Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 2. Project Number: 01-007 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $1,545 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-031-2011) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $1,545 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-031-2011 $29,355 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $29,355 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $


Revised 8/31/2010

Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $30,900 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.


Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

10. Project Objective: This project will enhance safety by ensuring that the pavement markings at runway intersections meet standards for warning pilots of the runway intersection. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or


Revised 8/31/2010

PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2010 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No


Revised 8/31/2010


Project 01-008 - Expand Terminal Building

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Expand Terminal Building 2. Project Number: 01-008 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: $819,158 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $819,158 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-032-2012 $590,927 3-12-0067-033-2014 $6,457,631 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $7,048,558 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ 2017 $686,424 $686,424 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $686,424


Revised 8/31/2010

Other Funds: State Grants $1,095,793 Local Funds $460,577 Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $1,556,370 Total Project Cost: $10,110,510 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport’s passenger terminal building and reconfiguration of the existing structure. The project included a reconfiguration of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360-9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/5360-13, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand. Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make-up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: 4 Number of gates: 2 Number of baggage facilities: 1 At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: 20 Number of gates: 6 Number of baggage facilities: 2


Revised 8/31/2010

Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: +16 Number of gates: +4 Number of baggage facilities: +1 Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ]


Revised 8/31/2010

LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity at the Airport by providing expanded space for all terminal functions including ticketing areas, passenger screening functions and passenger hold room areas as demanded by the significant increase in passenger volume at the Airport. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future


Revised 8/31/2010

needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports 2007 – 2014; Airport records for 2015):

Calendar Year

Total Enplanements

2007 7,0312008 53,0732009 64,6502010 87,0412011 147,6982012 99,8972013 171,1212014 336,9052015 418,017

FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study:


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): November 2014 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): March 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO


Revised 8/31/2010

b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve.


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Phase 1 and 2 New Construction

Prorate PFC EligibleNon PFC Eligible Total

$ 911,145.34 $ 911,145.34 $ 8,905.31 $ 8,905.31 $ 10,554.45 $ 10,554.45

$ 789,604.32 $ 789,604.32 $ 1,235,034.83 $ 1,235,034.83 $ 77,437.50 $ 77,437.50

$ 125,663.84 $ 125,663.84 $ 19,789.59 $ 19,789.59 $ 18,965.02 $ 18,965.02

$ 410,304.00 $ 410,304.00 $ 6,145.84 $ 6,145.84

$ 70,625.86 $ 70,625.86 $ 10,719.36 $ 10,719.36

$ 26,386.11 $ 26,386.11 $ 9,526.04 $ 9,526.04

$ 12,009.98 $ 12,009.98 $ 10,719.36 $ 10,719.36 $ 85,145.39 $ 85,145.39

$ 11,216.15 $ 11,216.15 $ 43,737.85 $ 43,737.85 $ 13,193.05 $ 13,193.05 $ 43,737.85 $ 43,737.85

$ 24,890.62 $ 24,890.62 $ 10,140.62 $ 10,140.62

$ 10,575.96 $ 10,575.96 $ 15,336.93 $ 15,336.93 $ 15,336.93 $ 15,336.93 $ 15,666.75 $ 15,666.75

$ 292,644.08 $ 292,644.08 $ 1,460,800.98 $ 1,460,800.98 $ 153,699.09 $ 153,699.09 $ 5,631,134.80 $ 318,524.20 $ 5,949,659.00

$ 5,277.22 $ 5,277.22 $ 8,757.81 $ 8,757.81 $ 58,078.12 $ 58,078.12 $ 15,825.52 $ 15,825.52 $ 27,195.31 $ 27,195.31 $ 8,757.81 $ 8,757.81 $ 3,994.79 $ 3,994.79 $ 111,239.58 $ 111,239.58 $ 239,126.16 $ 226,324.17 $ 12,801.99 $ 239,126.16

$ 5,857,458.97 $ 331,326.19 $ 6,188,785.16 94.65% 5.35% 100.00%

Phase 3 and 4 Reconfigure Existing Space

PFC EligibleNon PFC Eligible Total

$ 391,937.11 $ 391,937.11 $ 250,725.13 $ 250,725.13

$ 148,077.08 $ 148,077.08 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 12,267.63 $ 12,267.63 $ 17,908.94 $ 17,908.94

$ 97,718.13 $ 97,718.13 $ 231,134.75 $ 231,134.75 $ 5,820.41 $ 5,820.41 $ ‐ $ ‐

$ 8,596.29 $ 8,596.29 $ 4,924.96 $ 4,924.96 $ 32,723.61 $ 32,723.61 $ 34,146.37 $ 34,146.37 $ 49,428.67 $ 49,428.67 $ 870,200.27 $ 415,208.81 $ 1,285,409.08

$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 3,382.80 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 3,382.80 $ 2,290.10 $ 1,092.70 $ 3,382.80

$ 872,490.37 $ 416,301.51 $ 1,288,791.88 67.70% 32.30% 100.00%

Overall Eligibility CalculationFor Design & Construction Phase Services

PFC Eligible Total PFC Eligible %PHASE 1 & 2 $ 5,857,458.97 $ 6,188,785.16 94.65%PHASE 3 & 4 $ 872,490.37 $ 1,288,791.88 67.70%ALLOWANCE $ ‐ $ 100,000.00 0.00%HOLD ROOM ‐ CO 1 $ 221,936.00 $ 221,936.00 100.00%AVG. ELIGIBILITY $ 6,951,885.34 $ 7,799,513.04 89.13%

Use Room # SFPassenger Screening 117 5525Private Screening 117A 54Leo 117B 64

IT 117C 32

Hold Room Circulation 121 4788

Mechancial & Electrical to Prorate

Hold Rooms 121A 7489

TSA Storage 125 40Rest Room 126 394

Electrical 121B 57

Concession Shell Only 122 504TSA 123 762TSA 123A 120TSA 123B 115Circulation Corridor 124 2488

Vestibule 127 65Storage 128 160Janitorial 129 62Rest Room 130 67Vestibule 131 65Rest Room 132 475

Rest Room 136 244

Mechanical 133 378

IT (Airline) 134 73

Vestibule 137 80Rest Room 138 244Storage 140 162Janitorial 141 66Rest Room 142 59Baggage Office 143 93Baggage Office 144 93Baggage Office 145 95In‐bound Baggage Handling 146 2857Baggage Claim 147 8858

IT 148 26

IT 134A 103

Circulation Corridor 150 932Subtotal ‐ Phase 1&2 37093

Mechanical 149 724

Electrical 135 177Electrical 135A 57

Total Phases 1&2 38647

Use Room # SF

Circulation

Sub‐Total Phase 3&4

Ticketing Lobby 101 4377Ticketing Circulation 101B 2800Ticketing Airline 101A 1353

Janitorial 109 78111 62

Circulation 112 96

Equipment 103 65Storage 105 137

Unfinished Offices 108 3574

Storage 106 200TSA Bag Screening 107 1511

15471

IT 110 81IT 105A 34Electrical 104 90Mechanical 102 406

Mechancial & Electrical to Prorate

Total Phases 3&4 $1,288,791.88 16082

Subtotal ‐ Mechanical & Electrical 1554

Subtotal ‐ Mechanical & Electrical 611

Rest Room 114 299Rest Room 115 312Waiting Room 121A 552

Janitorial

113 55

Charlotte County Airport AuthorityPunta Gorda AirportPFC Project 01‐008 ‐ Terminal Expansion

PFC Total PFC Not Grant Work Eligibility % Cost Eligible PFC Eligible

Design (AIP 32 funding)

Terminal Design 89.13% 853,041 760,315 92,726

Subtotals 853,041 760,315 92,726

Construction (AIP 33 funding)

Construction ‐ Phases 1 & 2 94.65% 6,188,785 5,857,685 331,100

Construction ‐ Phases 3 & 4 67.70% 1,288,792 872,512 416,280

Allowance 0.00% 100,000 ‐ 100,000

Hold Room (Change Order 2) 100.00% 221,936 221,936 ‐

Construction Fee 89.13% 322,000 286,999 35,001

Construction Phase Services 89.13% 188,436 167,953 20,483

Construction / Grant Admin 89.13% 182,827 162,954 19,873

IFE Construction Phase Services 89.13% 2,000 1,783 217

Subtotals 8,494,776 7,571,821 922,955

Baggage Belts ‐ Future AIP Grant

Baggage Belts 100.00% 762,693 762,693 ‐

TOTAL PROJECT 10,110,510 9,094,830 1,015,680

Funding Sources:

AIP 32 590,927 590,927 ‐

AIP 33 6,457,631 6,457,631 ‐

AIP Future 686,424 686,424 ‐

State ‐ AIP 32 scope of work 39,085 32,829 6,256

State ‐ AIP 33 scope of work 1,018,573 469,726 548,847

State ‐ AIP Future match 38,135 38,135 ‐

Local Funds 460,577 ‐ 460,577

Subtotal 9,291,352 8,275,672 1,015,680

Balance ‐ PFC Eligible Costs 819,158 819,158 ‐

Total Funding 10,110,510 9,094,830 1,015,680

Project 01-009 - Reconfigure Access Road

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Reconfigure Access Road 2. Project Number: 01-009 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $23,186 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-032-2012) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $23,186 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-032-2012 $417,362 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $417,362 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $23,187


Revised 8/31/2010

Local Funds $79,724 Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $102,911 Total Project Cost: $543,459 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE


Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity by improving the vehicle throughput capacity of the roadway and reducing congestion. This is necessary for the efficient movement of passengers and baggage at the curb. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.


Revised 8/31/2010

Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): February 2013 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): November 2013 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.


Revised 8/31/2010


Project 1.09 – Reconfigure Access Road

Before

After

Project 01-010 - Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan 2. Project Number: 01-010 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $6,900 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-032-2012) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $6,900 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-032-2012 $124,200 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $124,200 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds:


Revised 8/31/2010

State Grants $6,900 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $6,900 Total Project Cost: $138,000 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO


Revised 8/31/2010

[X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.


Revised 8/31/2010

How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: The objective of this project is to enhance safety at the Airport by identifying and assessing wildlife hazards at the airport and developing a plan to manage those hazards. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: 14 CFR 139.337, Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.


Revised 8/31/2010

Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): November 2012 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): March 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain.


Revised 8/31/2010

13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.


Revised 8/31/2010


Project 01-011 - Construct a Portion of Taxiway A

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 2. Project Number: 01-011 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $136,662 (Local match – AIP #3-12-0067-034-2015) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $136,662 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ 3-12-0067-034-2015 $2,459,913 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $2,459,913 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $136,662


Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60’ wide asphalt taxiway pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.


Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity by eliminating a bottleneck at Taxiways C and D and will allow air traffic control to clear aircraft from the runway more quickly. The project will reduce travel distance between the terminal and Runway 22, increasing the efficient of aircraft ground movements. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway 04-22 is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway 15-33 and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.


Revised 8/31/2010

Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): December 2015 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): August 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.


Revised 8/31/2010


Project 01-012 - Update Airport Master Plan Study

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Update Airport Master Plan Study 2. Project Number: 01-012 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50



Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular 150-5070-6, Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport’s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e-ALP as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities:


Revised 8/31/2010

Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules.


Revised 8/31/2010

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: The objective of this project is to enhance capacity by ensuring that the long term development of the airport is appropriate based on current and forecasted aviation demand and undertaken in accordance with applicable standards. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The Airport’s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports 2007 – 2014; Airport records for 2015):

Calendar Year

Total Enplanements

2007 7,0312008 53,0732009 64,6502010 87,041


Revised 8/31/2010

2011 147,6982012 99,8972013 171,1212014 336,9052015 418,017

FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs.


Revised 8/31/2010

12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): May 2018 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by:


Revised 8/31/2010

__________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 01-013 - Conduct Environmental Assessment

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Conduct Environmental Assessment 2. Project Number: 01-013 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50



Revised 8/31/2010

Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $18,069 Total Project Cost: $361,394 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5-year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?


Revised 8/31/2010

If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity at the Airport by ensuring that projects identified for near-term construction have received the appropriate environmental review and approval prior to execution of those projects. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Those projects included in the 5-year CIP are likely to be identified for near-term construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders 1050.1F and 5050.4B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application.


Revised 8/31/2010

If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): May 2018 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No


Revised 8/31/2010

Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use


Revised 8/31/2010

Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 01-014 - Extend Terminal Apron to the North

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Extend Terminal Apron to the North 2. Project Number: 01-014 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $131,125 (Local match – future AIP grant) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $131,125 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ 2017 $2,360,250 $0 $2,360,250 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $2,360,250 Other Funds: State Grants $131,125


Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG-III standards. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE


Revised 8/31/2010



Revised 8/31/2010

If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity by providing for additional aircraft parking positions at the terminal. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD-80 / A-320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.


Revised 8/31/2010

Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2017 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): September 2017 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.)


Revised 8/31/2010


T

W

"

D

"

T

W

"

F

"

BLAST FENCE

4

6

'

9

3

'

1

5

5

'

100' R

60' R

9

3

'

2

5

'

A

-3

2

1

A

-3

2

0

22' MIN. CLEARANCE

T

O

F

A

LEGEND

CONCRETE PAVEMENT (9653 SY)

ASPHALT PAVEMENT (3191 SY)

BLAST FENCE

22' MIN.

CLEARANCE

22' MIN. CLEARANCE

00 80'

Project 1.14 – Extend Terminal Apron to the North

Project 01-015 - Construct Air Traffic Control Tower

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Construct Air Traffic Control Tower 2. Project Number: 01-015 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $832,028 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $832,028 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $3,328,100 Local Funds $


Revised 8/31/2010

Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $3,328,100 Total Project Cost: $4,160,128 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order 6480.4, Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Process. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO


Revised 8/31/2010

[X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.


Revised 8/31/2010

How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances safety and capacity by providing positive control of commercial and general aviation aircraft operating at the Airport. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non-towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. Approach and departure control was available from Ft. Myers TRACON and Miami Center. The construction of an air traffic control tower was the principal recommendation of the Airport’s Master Plan update completed in March 2008. At the time of the start of construction, the airport was accommodating almost 90,000 operations per year and supported more than 270 based aircraft. The Airport was home to 10 commercial aviation businesses providing services including charter, sales, maintenance and flight instruction. Public safety and emergency operators were also based at and used the airport for life-saving missions. Two commercial service airlines were operating at the Airport. The dynamic fleet mix ranged from single engine Cessna 152’s to Airbus 319’s. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport. FOR FAA USE


Revised 8/31/2010

Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): February 2012 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes


Revised 8/31/2010

[ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. [ ] YES [ ] NO b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:


Revised 8/31/2010

16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. __________________________ ________________ ______________ Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

Project 1.15 – Construct Air Traffic Control Tower

Project 01-016 - Install Instrument Landing System

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Install Instrument Landing System 2. Project Number: 01-016 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $297,791 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $297,791 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $1,691,163 Local Funds $


Revised 8/31/2010

Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $1,691,193 Total Project Cost: $1,988,954 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat-I ILS. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE


Revised 8/31/2010

Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?


Revised 8/31/2010

If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances safety by providing aircraft with the technology to arrive and depart from Runway 04 during periods of inclement weather when the Airport can not be located based on visual observation alone. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.


Revised 8/31/2010

Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): May 2015 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): September 2015 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A


Revised 8/31/2010


November 9, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration. Airport District Office. 5950 Hazetime National Dr. Suite 400 Orlando FL To whom it may concern, Since its inaugural flight at Punta Gorda airport (KPGD), Allegiant Air has been continually expanding its operation in this market. Today, KPGD is a pilot domicile from which we operate a fleet of MD-80 and Airbus A320 aircraft to markets throughout the eastern half of the continental United States. Three years ago, prior to implementation of the Airbus fleet, Allegiant Air operated only the MD-80 at KPGD. A limitation of the MD-80 is the lack of a navigation capability to perform RNAV instrument approach procedures. Allegiant Air’s Flight Safety department identified the benefit of installing a precision approach at KPGD, and began a dialogue with the Charlotte County Airport Authority to explore possibilities for installing an ILS on the airfield. Thanks to the Charlotte County Airport Authority, the availability of the ILS to runway 4 has virtually eliminated the number of weather diversions and associated operational disruptions that occurred prior to its commissioning. Even with the transition to the Airbus fleet, the ILS provides an important weather capability, since Allegiant Air’s operations specifications only authorize operation of the Airbus to RNAV LNAV weather minima which are higher than that provided by the ILS to runway 4. We encourage the FAA to continue to support the ILS at KPGD. Recognizing the outstanding and award-winning efforts of the Charlotte County Airport Authority, we also encourage the FAA to support their continued efforts on airport improvements. Regards, Brian Heinitz Manager, Flight Safety Allegiant Air

Project 01-017 - PFC Application Costs

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: PFC Application Costs 2. Project Number: 01-017 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $58,910 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $58,910 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds $


Revised 8/31/2010

Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $58,910 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.


Revised 8/31/2010

If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective:


Revised 8/31/2010

Development resulting from this PFC application will preserve and enhance capacity and safety at the Airport. The funding provided for in this PFC application will fund the projects needed to preserve and enhance capacity and safety. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project is necessary to develop the PFC program. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or


Revised 8/31/2010

PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): June 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): July 2022 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No


Revised 8/31/2010


Project 01-018 - Mitigate Wetlands

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Mitigate Wetlands 2. Project Number: 01-018 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [X] Impose Only: [ ] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $250,000 (Local match – Future AIP grant) Pay-as-you-go $2,500,000 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $2,750,000 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ 2018 $2,250,000 $0 $2,250,000 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $2,250,000 Other Funds:


Revised 8/31/2010

State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $5,000,000 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis


Revised 8/31/2010

7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?


Revised 8/31/2010

If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances safety at the Airport by mitigating wildlife attractants which could pose a threat to aircraft arriving to and departing from the Airport. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, 2016. This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.


Revised 8/31/2010

Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2018 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2020 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): December 2018


Revised 8/31/2010


AIRPO

RT FE

ATUR

ES

FIGURE3

Path

: I:\M

isc_

Jobs

\Car

twrig

ht\P

unta

Gor

da A

irpor

t\Wild

life

Haz

ard

Ass

essm

ent 2

012\

appl

icat

ions

\mxd

\figu

res\

Figu

re 3

- A

irpor

t Fea

ture

s.m

xd, D

ate

Sav

ed: 4

/14/

2014

9:3

5:49

AM

PUNT

A GOR

DAAIR

PORT

Wildlif

e Haza

rd Ass

essme

nt

Aerial Image Feb 2010 - Mar 2011: © 2010 DigitalGlobe Image courtesy of USGS Earthstar Geographics

LegendAirport Property Line

SIDA (No Access)

Runway ProtectionZone (RPZ)

Wetland

Airfield Pavement/

0 1,200Feet

Sources:- URS Inc., 2013

Project 01-019 - PFC Administration Costs

Revised 8/31/2010

PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: 17-01-C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: PFC Administration Costs 2. Project Number: 01-019 3. Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00

[ ] $4.00 [ ] $4.50

6. Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $3,590 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $3,590 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds $


Revised 8/31/2010

Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $3,590 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? [ ] YES [ ] NO If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES [ ] NO. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? [ ] YES [ ] NO c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? [ ] YES [ ] NO d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. [ ] YES [ ] NO What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A


Revised 8/31/2010

If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC’s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: PFC-eligible costs included in this PFC project are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.


Revised 8/31/2010

If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order 5200.8, with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] YES [ ] NO [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE __ Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) _____________________________________ Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ______________ __ Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) _________________________ CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date ________________ __ Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) ____________________________ __ Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) ________________________________________ __ Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) ___________________________________ __ Project does not qualify under “significant contribution “ rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA’s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective:


Revised 8/31/2010

Development resulting from this PFC application will preserve and enhance capacity and safety at the Airport. The funding provided for in this PFC application will fund the projects needed to preserve and enhance capacity and safety. FOR FAA USE __ Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] __ Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport __ Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport __ Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project is necessary to administer the PFC program. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or


Revised 8/31/2010

PGL ____); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph ___ of Order 5100.38_ or PGL ____); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. 47505; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. 47504. [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. 40117(a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier ___________, percentage of annual boardings _______); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter ______ [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): June 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): July 2022 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No


Revised 8/31/2010


AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION

AND PUBLIC NOTICE

Attached is the summary of the consultation with the air carriers operating at the Airport, including:

(i) A list of all carriers operating at the Airport and a list of those notified

(ii) A list of carriers that acknowledged receipt of the notice

(iii) A copy of the information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting

(iv) Lists of carriers that certified agreement and disagreement with the proposed projects

(v) A summary of substantive comments by carriers contained in the certificates of disagreement with the proposed projects, and the Airport’s reasons for proceeding.

(also attached is a copy of the Airline Notice, the consultation meeting agenda, and the sign-in sheet)

(i) The carriers listed below operated at least one scheduled flight into Punta Gorda Airport or

appeared on the latest official FAA publication of the Air Carrier Activity Information System as having a “significant business interest” and therefore were sent a PFC notice of proposed application #1 via certified mail on September 23, 2016:

Allegiant Air LLC Falcon Air Express Frontier Airlines Inc. Miami Air International, Inc.

(ii) Delivery confirmation (of the notice) were obtained by the Airport for all of the air carriers

who received a notice.

(iii) Copies of all information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting including the following:

Powerpoint presentation provided at the consultation meeting

(iv) The Airport did not receive any letters of Certification of Agreement or disagreement with

the proposed application.

(v) There were no letters of disagreement received by the Airport by any Air Carrier.

Punta Gorda Airport (PGD)

Proposed Passenger Facility Charge Application #1

Project Descriptions

“Impose and Use” Projects 01-001 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12” portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG-III standards. The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris. The start date for this project was September 2008 and was completed in July 2009. The total cost of this project was $3,035,229 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #22 and #24 in the amount of $2,883,468. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $151,761. 01-002 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway 03-21 to Runway 04-22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7” of asphalt. This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport’s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron. The start date for this project was October 2007 and was completed in December 2007. The total cost of this project was $1,647,239 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #23, #25, #28,

#29, #30 and #31 in the amount of $1,564,877. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $41,181 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $41,181. 01-003 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40’ wide and were widened to 60’ wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4” of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights. The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway 04-22. The start date for this project was March 2009 and was completed in February 2010. The total cost of this project was $2,516,063 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #26 in the amount of $2,390,250. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $42,280 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $83,533. 01-004 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Equipment This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport’s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500-gallon water tanks and s 205-gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA8371001833. The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 – a 2014 E-One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE1008879. These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/5220-10, Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was January 2008 and it was completed in March 2015. The total cost of this project was $1,090,740 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #31 and #33 in the amount of $1,009,829. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $40,455 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $40,456. The funding breakdown by purchase is as follows:

Unit AIP Grant # AIP Funds State Funds PFC Funds Total ARFF71 31 $535,101 $0 $28,163 $563,264 ARFF72 33 $472,478 $26,248 $26,249 $524,975 Totals $1,007,579 $26,248 $54,412 $1,088,239

01-005 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD-80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/5360-14 and 150/5220-21B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft. These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport. The start date for this project was September 2010 and is estimated to be completed in December 2016. Two of the lift devices were acquired utilizing AIP funds. The third was acquired with 100% local airport funds. The total cost of this project was $142,300 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $86,260. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $4,540 plus the cost of the third lift acquired entirely with local funds in the amount of $51,500. The total PFC amount requested is $56,040. 01-006 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project 01-002 above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage. This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December 2010. The total cost of this project was $66,073 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $62,769. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $3,304. 01-007 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings. This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December 2010. The total cost of this project was $30,900 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $29,355. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $1,545.

01-008 Expand Terminal Building This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport’s passenger terminal building and rehabilitation of the existing structure. The project included a rehabilitation of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360-9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/5360-13, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand. Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make-up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors. The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports 2007 – 2014; Airport records for 2015):

Calendar Year

Total Enplanements

2007 7,031 2008 53,073 2009 64,650 2010 87,041 2011 147,698 2012 99,897 2013 171,121 2014 336,905 2015 418,017

The start date for this project was November 2014 and it was completed in March 2016. The funding breakdown by grant is as follows:

AIP Funds PFC Funds State Funds Local Funds

Total

AIP Grant 32 $590,927 $32,829 $39,085 $190,200 $853,041 AIP Grant 33 $5,634,211 $313,012 $1,249,568 $936,553 $8,133,344 Baggage System $0 $606,889 $155,804 $0 $762,693 Totals $6,225,138 $952,730 $1,444,457 $1,126,753 $9,749,078

01-009 Reconfigure Access Road This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert. This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building. The start date for this project was February 2013 and it was completed in November 2013. The total cost of this project was $543,459 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $417,362. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $23,187. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining eligible local match of $23,187. Ineligible costs totaled $79,724 and were funded with State and Airport funds. 01-010 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. 14 CFR 139.337, Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation. The start date for this project was November 2012 and it was completed in March 2016. The total cost of this project was $138,000. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $124,200. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $6,900 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $6,900. 01-0011 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60’ wide asphalt taxiway

pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting. This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway 04-22 is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway 15-33 and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate. The start date for this project was December 2015 and is estimated to be completed in August 2016. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,733,237. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #34 in the amount of $2,459,913. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $136,662 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $136,662. 01-012 Update Airport Master Plan Study This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular 150-5070-6, Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport’s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e-ALP as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste. The Airport’s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May 2018. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,087,746 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $978,971. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $54,387 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $54,388. 01-013 Conduct Environmental Assessment This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5-year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation.

Those projects included in the 5-year CIP are likely to be identified for near-term construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders 1050.1F and 5050.4B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May 2018. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $361,394 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $325,255. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $18,069 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $18,070. 01-014 Extend Terminal Apron to the North This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG-III standards. Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD-80 / A-320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2017 and it is estimated to be completed in September 2017. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,622,500 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in the amount of $2,360,250. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $131,125 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $131,125. 01-015 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order 6480.4, Air Traffic Control

Tower Siting Process. Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non-towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and

the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport. The start date for this project was March 2010 and was completed in February 2012. The total cost of this project was $4,160,128 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $3,328,100 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $832,028. 01-016 Install Instrument Landing System This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat-I ILS. Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather. The start date for this project was May 2015 and was completed in September 2015. The total cost of this project was $1,988,954 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $1,691,163 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $297,791. 01-017 PFC Administration Costs PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Also included are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. The total cost of this project is $62,500. PFCs are anticipated to provide 100% funding for this project. This project started in June 2016 and will be complete in July 2022. “Impose Only” Project 01-018 Mitigate Wetlands This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation. Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, 2016. This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife

Attractants on or Near Airports. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2018 and it is estimated to be completed in December 2020. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $5,000,000 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in of approximately $2,250,000. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $250,000 plus the costs in excess of available AIP funds estimated to be $2,500,000. The total PFC amount requested is $2,250,000. Alternative Projects for “Impose Only” Projects Alternative Project #1 – Taxiway E Extension This project includes the extension of Taxiway E of approximately 1,700’ of asphalt pavement to provide a full length parallel taxiway for Runway 09/27. This would include the relocation of the existing Taxiway E to meet the ADG-III standards. The project also includes the construction of drainage structures, pavement markings and airfield lighting. The estimated cost for this project is $2,550,000. Alternative Project #2 – Apron Expansion to the North of Runway 09/27 This project includes the construction of additional aircraft parking apron north of Runway 09/27. The construction of aprons and taxilanes will be of asphalt pavement. The additional parking apron will provide 80 aircraft parking positions. The project also includes pavement markings, apron lighting and perimeter fencing. The estimated cost for this project is $3,150,000.

1

PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGENEW PFC APPLICATION #1

AIRLINE CONSULTATION MEETINGOCTOBER 25, 2016

Agenda• Introductions• Proposed “Impose and Use” and

“Impose Only” Application #1 –Projects Description

• Proposed Financial Plan• Next Steps in the PFC Process• Questions and Comments

2

Proposed PFC Application #1Impose and Use Projects:

1.01 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation

1.02 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension1.03 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 11.04 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF)

Equipment1.05 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices1.06 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension1.07 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings1.08 Expand Terminal Building1.09 Reconfigure Access Road

Proposed PFC Application #1Impose and Use Projects:

1.10 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan

1.11 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A1.12 Update Airport Master Plan Study1.13 Conduct Environmental Assessment1.14 Extend Terminal Apron to the North1.15 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower1.16 Install Instrument Landing System1.17 PFC Administration Costs

Impose Only Project:1.18 Mitigate Wetlands

3

Proposed PFC Application #1

• PFC Revenue – Impose ‐ $5,657,156• PFC Revenue – Use ‐ $2,907,156• PFC Level ‐ $2.00• Estimated Collection Start Date – July 1, 2017• Estimated Collection End Date – July 1, 2022• Proposed Carrier Exemptions – None

Project 1.01 – Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation

Description: This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12” portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG‐III standards.

Need: The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris.

• Project Start Date: September 2008 • Project Completion Date: July 2009• Total Project Cost: $3,035,229• FAA Grant: $2,883,468• PFC Funds: $151,761

4

Project 1.01 – Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation, Phase 1

Project 1.01 – Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation, Phase 2

5


Description: This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway 03‐21 to Runway 04‐22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7” of asphalt.


Need: This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport’s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron.

• Project Start Date: October 2007• Project Completion Date: December 2007• Total Project Cost: $1,647,239• FAA Grant: $1,564,877• State Grant: $41,181• PFC Funds: $41,181

6


Before

After

Project 1.03 – Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1

Description: This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40’ wide and were widened to 60’ wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4” of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights.

Need: The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway 04‐22.

• Project Start Date: March 2009• Project Completion Date: February 2010• Total Project Cost: $2,516,063• FAA Grant: $2,390,250• State Grant: $42,280• PFC Funds: $83,533

7

Project 1.03 – Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1

Project 1.04 – Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Equipment

Description: This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport’s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E‐One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500‐gallon water tanks and s 205‐gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E‐One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA8371001833. The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 – a 2014 E‐One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE1008879.

Need: These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/5220‐10, Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139.

• Project Start Date: January 2008• Project Completion Date: March 2015• Total Project Cost: $1,088,239• FAA Grant: $1,007,579• State Grant: $26,248• PFC Funds: $54,412

8

Project 1.05 – Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices

Description: This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD‐80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/5360‐14 and 150/5220‐21B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft.

Need: These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport.

• Project Start Date: September 2010• Project Completion Date: December 2016• Total Project Cost: $142,300• FAA Grant: $86,260• PFC Funds: $56,040

Project 1.05 – Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices

9


Description: This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project 01‐002 above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage.

Need: This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension.

• Project Start Date: September 2010• Project Completion Date: December 2010• Total Project Cost: $66,073• FAA Grant: $62,769• PFC Funds: $3,304


Before

After

10

Project 1.07 – Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings

Description: This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340‐1J, Standards for Airport Markings.

Need: This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139.

• Project Start Date: September 2010 • Project Completion Date: December 2010• Total Project Cost: $30,900• FAA Grant: $29,355• PFC Funds: $1,545

Project 1.07 – Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings

11

Project 1.08 – Expand Terminal Building

Description: This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport’s passenger terminal building and rehabilitation of the existing structure. The project included a rehabilitation of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360‐9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non‐hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/5360‐13, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand.

Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make‐up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors.


Need: The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports 2007 – 2014; Airport records for 2015):

• Project Start Date: November 2014• Project Completion Date: March 2016• Total Project Cost: $9,749,978• FAA Grant: $6,225,138• State Grant: $1,444,457• PFC Funds: $952,730• Local Funds: $1,126,753

Calendar Year

Total Enplanements

2007 7,0312008 53,0732009 64,6502010 87,0412011 147,6982012 99,8972013 171,1212014 336,9052015 418,017

12



Description: This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert.

Need: This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building.

• Project Start Date: February 2013• Project Completion Date: November 2013• Total Project Cost: $543,459• FAA Grant: $417,362• State Grant: $23,187• PFC Funds: $23,187

13



Before

After

14

Project 1.10 – Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan

Description: The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation.

Need: 14 CFR 139.337, Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA).

• Project Start Date: November 2012• Project Completion Date: March 2016• Total Project Cost: $138,000• FAA Grant: $124,200• State Grant: $6,900• PFC Funds: $6,900

Project 1.11 – Construct a Portion of Taxiway A

Description: This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60’ wide asphalt taxiway pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting.

Need: This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway 04‐22 is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway 15‐33 and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate.

• Project Start Date: December 2015• Project Completion Date: August 2016• Total Project Cost: $2,733,237• FAA Grant: $2,459,913• State Grant: $136,662• PFC Funds: $136,662

15

Project 1.11 – Construct a Portion of Taxiway A

Project 1.12 – Update Airport Master Plan Study

Description: This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular 150‐5070‐6, Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport’s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e‐ALP as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste.

16

Project 1.12 – Update Airport Master Plan Study

Need: The Airport’s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements.

• Project Start Date: September 2016• Project Completion Date: May 2018• Total Project Cost: $1,087,746• FAA Grant: $978,971• State Grant: $54,387• PFC Funds: $54,388

Project 1.13 – Conduct Environmental Assessment

Description: This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5‐year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5‐year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation.

17

Project 1.13 – Conduct Environmental Assessment

Need: Those projects included in the 5‐year CIP are likely to be identified for near‐term construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders 1050.1F and 5050.4B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects.

• Project Start Date: September 2016• Project Completion Date: May 2018• Total Project Cost: $361,394• FAA Grant: $325,255• State Grant: $18,069• PFC Funds: $18,070


Description: This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG‐III standards.

Need: Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD‐80 / A‐320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground.

• Project Start Date: March 2017• Project Completion Date: September 2017• Total Project Cost: $2,622,500• FAA Grant: $2,360,250• State Grant: $131,125• PFC Funds: $131,125

18



19


Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order 6480.4, Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Process.


Need: Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non‐towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport.

• Project Start Date: March 2010• Project Completion Date: February 2012• Total Project Cost: $4,160,128• State Grant: $3,328,100• PFC Funds: $832,028

20


Project 1.16 – Install Instrument Landing System

Description: This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat‐I ILS.

Need: Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather.

• Project Start Date: May 2015• Project Completion Date: September 2015• Total Project Cost: $1,988,954• State Grant: $1,691,163• PFC Funds: $297,791

21

Project 1.17 – PFC Administration Costs

Description: PFC‐eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Also included are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application.

Need: This project is necessary to develop and administer the PFC program.

• Project Start Date: June 2016• Project Completion Date: July 2022• Total Project Cost (100% PFC Funded): $62,500

Project 1.18 – Mitigate Wetlands

Description: This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation.

Need: Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public‐use airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, 2016. This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/5200‐33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports.

• Project Start Date: March 2018• Project Completion Date: December 2020• Total Project Cost: $5,000,000• FAA Grant: $2,250,000• PFC Funds: $2,750,000

22



Alternative Project #1 – Taxiway E ExtensionThis project includes the extension of Taxiway E of approximately 1,700’ of asphalt pavement to provide a full length parallel taxiway for Runway 09/27. This would include the relocation of the existing Taxiway E to meet the ADG‐III standards. The project also includes the construction of drainage structures, pavement markings and airfield lighting. The estimated cost for this project is $2,550,000.

Alternative Project #2 – Apron Expansion to the North of Runway 09/27This project includes the construction of additional aircraft parking apron north of Runway 09/27. The construction of aprons and taxilanes will be of asphalt pavement. The additional parking apron will provide 80 aircraft parking positions. The project also includes pavement markings, apron lighting and perimeter fencing. The estimated cost for this project is $3,150,000.

23

Project 1.18 – Mitigate Wetlands ‐Alternative Projects

Proposed PFC Application #1 –Financial Plan Summary

Project Total State PFC PFC Other State/ Total No. Project Title AIP Grant(s) AIP Local Match Local Match Other Local Funds Project Cost

01‐001 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 22, 24 2,883,468 ‐ 151,761 3,035,229 01‐002 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 23, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31 1,564,877 41,181 41,181 1,647,239 01‐003 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 26 2,390,250 42,280 83,533 2,516,063 01‐004 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment 31, 33 1,007,579 26,248 54,412 1,088,239 01‐005 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 31 86,260 ‐ 4,540 51,500 142,300 01‐006 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension 31 62,769 ‐ 3,304 66,073 01‐007 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 31 29,355 ‐ 1,545 30,900 01‐008 Expand Terminal Building 32, 33 6,225,138 345,841 345,841 606,889 2,225,368 9,749,077 01‐009 Reconfigure Access Road 32 417,362 23,187 23,186 79,724 543,459 01‐010 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management P 32 124,200 6,900 6,900 138,000 01‐011 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 34 2,459,913 136,662 136,662 2,733,237 01‐012 Update Airport Master Plan Study 35 978,971 54,387 54,388 1,087,746 01‐013 Conduct Environmental Assessment 35 325,255 18,069 18,070 361,394 01‐014 Extend Terminal Apron to the North Future 2,360,250 131,125 131,125 2,622,500 01‐015 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower None ‐ ‐ ‐ 832,028 3,328,100 4,160,128 01‐016 Install Instrument Landing System None ‐ ‐ ‐ 297,791 1,691,163 1,988,954 01‐017 PFC Administration Costs None ‐ ‐ ‐ 62,500 62,500 01‐018 Mitigate Wetlands Future 2,250,000 ‐ 250,000 2,500,000 5,000,000

Totals 23,165,647 825,880 1,306,448 4,350,708 7,324,355 36,973,038 5,657,156$ Total Impose PFCs2,907,156$ Total Use PFCs

24

Next Steps In PFC Application Process

October 25, 2016 Airline Consultation Meeting

November 25, 2016 Deadline for Airline Certification of Agreement or Disagreement with Proposed Application #1Deadline for Public Comments

December 15, 2016 Airport Authority Approval of PFC Resolution

December 30, 2016 Submit Proposed Application #1 to the FAA

January 31, 2017 FAA determines application to be substantially complete

April 30, 2017 Latest Day for FAA approval of new application if no disagreement

July 1, 2017 PFC Application #1 Collection Start Date

Questions/Comments

PUBLIC COMMENT

Attached is the Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment as required by Part 158 – Passenger Facility Charges – Section 158.24.

This Notice was posted on the Airport’s website on September 23, 2016 allowing the public to file comments through October 28, 2016. No Comments were provided by the public related to the projects contained in this application.

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO

PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES Charlotte County Airport Authority is providing an opportunity for public comment until October 28, 2016 related to our proposed new “Impose and Use” and “Impose Only” Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application #1 for the Punta Gorda Airport. This written notice is provided in accordance with requirements contained in Federal Aviation Regulation 49 CFR Part 158.24 Passenger Facility Charge. The Authority plans to implement the PFC rate of $2.00 per enplaned passenger. We anticipate collection on this application to begin on July 1, 2017. Future PFC projects will likely extend the expiration date. The total PFC revenue to be collected for projects in this application (impose authority) is $5,657,156. The total PFC use authority requested in this application is $3,157,156. The PFC expiration date for this application is estimated to be July 1, 2022. The seventeen “Impose and Use” projects and one “Impose Only” project in this application are described below. “Impose and Use” Projects 01-001 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12” portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG-III standards. The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris. The start date for this project was September 2008 and was completed in July 2009. The total cost of this project was $3,035,229 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #22 and #24 in the amount of $2,883,468. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $151,761. 01-002 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway 03-21 to Runway 04-22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway

renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7” of asphalt. This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport’s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron. The start date for this project was October 2007 and was completed in December 2007. The total cost of this project was $1,647,239 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #23, #25, #28, #29, #30 and #31 in the amount of $1,564,877. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $41,181 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $41,181. 01-003 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40’ wide and were widened to 60’ wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4” of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights. The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway 04-22. The start date for this project was March 2009 and was completed in February 2010. The total cost of this project was $2,516,063 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #26 in the amount of $2,390,250. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $42,280 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $83,533. 01-004 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Equipment This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport’s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500-gallon water tanks and s 205-gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA8371001833. The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 – a 2014 E-One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE1008879.

These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/5220-10, Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was January 2008 and it was completed in March 2015. The total cost of this project was $1,090,740 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #31 and #33 in the amount of $1,009,829. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $40,455 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $40,456. The funding breakdown by purchase is as follows:

Unit AIP Grant # AIP Funds State Funds PFC Funds Total ARFF71 31 $535,101 $0 $28,163 $563,264 ARFF72 33 $472,478 $26,248 $26,249 $524,975 Totals $1,007,579 $26,248 $54,412 $1,088,239

01-005 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD-80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/5360-14 and 150/5220-21B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft. These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport. The start date for this project was September 2010 and is estimated to be completed in December 2016. Two of the lift devices were acquired utilizing AIP funds. The third was acquired with 100% local airport funds. The total cost of this project was $142,300 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $86,260. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $4,540 plus the cost of the third lift acquired entirely with local funds in the amount of $51,500. The total PFC amount requested is $56,040. 01-006 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project 01-002 above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage. This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December 2010. The total cost of this project was $66,073 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $62,769. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $3,304.

01-007 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings. This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December 2010. The total cost of this project was $30,900 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $29,355. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $1,545. 01-008 Expand Terminal Building This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport’s passenger terminal building and rehabilitation of the existing structure. The project included a rehabilitation of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360-9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/5360-13, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand. Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make-up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors. The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports 2007 – 2014; Airport records for 2015):

Calendar Year

Total Enplanements

2007 7,031 2008 53,073 2009 64,650 2010 87,041

2011 147,698 2012 99,897 2013 171,121 2014 336,905 2015 418,017

The start date for this project was November 2014 and it was completed in March 2016. The funding breakdown by grant is as follows:

AIP Funds PFC Funds State Funds Local Funds

Total

AIP Grant 32 $590,927 $32,829 $39,085 $190,200 $853,041 AIP Grant 33 $5,634,211 $313,012 $1,249,568 $936,553 $8,133,344 Baggage System $0 $606,889 $155,804 $0 $762,693 Totals $6,225,138 $952,730 $1,444,457 $1,126,753 $9,749,078

01-009 Reconfigure Access Road This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert. This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building. The start date for this project was February 2013 and it was completed in November 2013. The total cost of this project was $543,459 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $417,362. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $23,187. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining eligible local match of $23,187. Ineligible costs totaled $79,724 and were funded with State and Airport funds. 01-010 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. 14 CFR 139.337, Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation.

The start date for this project was November 2012 and it was completed in March 2016. The total cost of this project was $138,000. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $124,200. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $6,900 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $6,900. 01-0011 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60’ wide asphalt taxiway pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting. This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway 04-22 is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway 15-33 and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate. The start date for this project was December 2015 and is estimated to be completed in August 2016. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,733,237. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #34 in the amount of $2,459,913. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $136,662 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $136,662. 01-012 Update Airport Master Plan Study This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular 150-5070-6, Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport’s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e-ALP as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste. The Airport’s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May 2018. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,087,746 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $978,971. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $54,387 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $54,388.

01-013 Conduct Environmental Assessment This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5-year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation. Those projects included in the 5-year CIP are likely to be identified for near-term construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders 1050.1F and 5050.4B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May 2018. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $361,394 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $325,255. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $18,069 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $18,070. 01-014 Extend Terminal Apron to the North This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG-III standards. Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD-80 / A-320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2017 and it is estimated to be completed in September 2017. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,622,500 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in the amount of $2,360,250. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $131,125 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $131,125. 01-015 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA

and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order 6480.4, Air Traffic Control

Tower Siting Process. Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non-towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport. The start date for this project was March 2010 and was completed in February 2012. The total cost of this project was $4,160,128 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $3,328,100 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $832,028. 01-016 Install Instrument Landing System This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat-I ILS. Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather. The start date for this project was May 2015 and was completed in September 2015. The total cost of this project was $1,988,954 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $1,691,163 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $297,791. 01-017 PFC Administration Costs PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Also included are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. The total cost of this project is $62,500. PFCs are anticipated to provide 100% funding for this project. This project started in June 2016 and will be complete in July 2022.

“Impose Only” Project 01-018 Mitigate Wetlands This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation. Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, 2016. This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife

Attractants on or Near Airports. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2018 and it is estimated to be completed in December 2020. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $5,000,000 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in of approximately $2,250,000. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $250,000 plus the costs in excess of available AIP funds estimated to be $2,500,000. The total PFC amount requested is $2,250,000. Alternative Projects for “Impose Only” Projects Alternative Project #1 – Taxiway E Extension This project includes the extension of Taxiway E of approximately 1,700’ of asphalt pavement to provide a full length parallel taxiway for Runway 09/27. This would include the relocation of the existing Taxiway E to meet the ADG-III standards. The project also includes the construction of drainage structures, pavement markings and airfield lighting. The estimated cost for this project is $2,550,000. Alternative Project #2 – Apron Expansion to the North of Runway 09/27 This project includes the construction of additional aircraft parking apron north of Runway 09/27. The construction of aprons and taxilanes will be of asphalt pavement. The additional parking apron will provide 80 aircraft parking positions. The project also includes pavement markings, apron lighting and perimeter fencing. The estimated cost for this project is $3,150,000. Comments or a request for more detailed project descriptions should be sent to James Parish, P.E., President/CEO, 28000 A-1 Airport Road, Punta Gorda, FL 33982.

Employment Contact

Charlotte County Airport Authority

News Releases

Monthly Statistics

Employment

Meeting and Events Calendar

Economic Impact Study

Legal notices

Public Notice PFC-1

Tentative Budget Hearing ad

Meeting Change Ad

Notice of Emergency Meeting June 24, 2016

Notice of Special Meeting April 26, 2016

Meeting Cancelation Ad

Emergency Meeting April 14, 2016

Tentative Budget Ad

Emergency Meeting August 25, 2015

Special Meeting July 2, 2015

Workshop April 9, 2015

Disclaimer

Under Florida's very broad public records law, e-mail communication to and

from the Charlotte County Airport Authority is subject to public disclosure.

Quicklinks

Home

Contact Us

About Punta

Gorda Airport

Employment

Badging and

Drivers

Education

Flight Info

Arrivals/Departures

Airlines

Flight Tracking

Flight Map

Parking & Ground Transportation

Directions, Map and

Rates

Rental Cars

Taxi/Shuttle Service

Airport Information

Airport Services

Security and Alerts

Lost and Found

Frequently Asked

Questions

511 Travel Information

Noise Mitigation Program

Airport Facilities

Terminal Diagram

Runway Diagrams

NOTAMS

Air Traffic Control

ASOS Weather

Tie-Down/Hangar

Rentals

Dining and Lodging

Aviation Fuel Prices

Pilot and Gift Shop

Tenant Directory

Related Links

Services

Contact Information

28000 A-1 Airport

Road

Punta Gorda, FL

33982

Phone 941-639-1101

Fax 941-639-4792

www.flypgd.com

Contact Us

Copyright © 2016 Charlotte County Airport Authority Site created by 4What

You are here: Home > About CCAA > Legal notices

About CCAA

FLIGHTINFO

PARKING & GROUNDTRANSPORTATION

AIRPORTINFORMATION

ABOUTCCAA

BUSINESSOPPORTUNITIES

GENERALAVIATION

AIRPORTFACILITIES

Search

Page 1 of 2Legal notices

9/23/2016http://www.flypgd.com/legal-notices/

Leibowitz

Oval

Leibowitz

Oval

ALTERNATIVE USES/PROJECTS

Attachment E Alternative Projects for “Impose Only” Project 01-018

Alternative Project #1 – Taxiway E Extension This project includes the extension of Taxiway E of approximately 1,700’ of asphalt pavement to provide a full length parallel taxiway for Runway 09/27. This would include the relocation of the existing Taxiway E to meet the ADG-III standards. The project also includes the construction of drainage structures, pavement markings and airfield lighting. This project is necessary to provide for the relocation of general aviation facilities away from the terminal building complex in order to provide for future expansion of the terminal complex. The estimated cost for this project is $2,550,000. Alternative Project #2 – Apron Expansion to the North of Runway 09/27 This project includes the construction of additional aircraft parking apron north of Runway 09/27. The construction of aprons and taxilanes will be of asphalt pavement. The additional parking apron will provide 80 aircraft parking positions. The project also includes pavement markings, apron lighting and perimeter fencing. This project is necessary to provide for the relocation of general aviation facilities away from the terminal building complex in order to provide for future expansion of the terminal complex. The estimated cost for this project is $3,150,000.

ATTACHMENT G

ALP/AIRSPACE/ENVIRONMENTAL

ATTACHMENT G: AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP), AIRSPACE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS

ALL PROJECTS FOR WHICH IMPOSE AND USE OR USE AUTHORITY IS REQUESTED IN THE APPLICATION MUST BE LISTED UNDER EACH TYPE OF FINDING BELOW. *****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************************************* PFC Application Number: ******************************************************************************************************************* I. ALP Findings

1. Current ALP approval date: October 6, 2009 List proposed project(s) shown on this ALP: 01-001 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 01-002 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 01-003 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 01-006 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension 01-007 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 01-008 Expand Terminal Building 01-009 Reconfigure Access Road 01-011 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 01-014 Extend Terminal Apron to the North 01-015 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower 01-016 Install Instrument Landing System

2. List proposed project(s) not required to be shown on an ALP: 01-004 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment

01-005 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 01-010 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard

Management Plan 01-012 Update Airport Master Plan Study 01-013 Conduct Environmental Assessment 01-017 PFC Administration Costs

*****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************************************** Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency’s finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA’s nonconcurrance below. ******************************************************************************************************************** II. Airspace Findings

1. FAA Airspace finding date: __________________ (repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding: 01-001 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 01-002 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 01-003 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 01-006 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension 01-007 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 01-008 Expand Terminal Building 01-009 Reconfigure Access Road

01-011 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 01-014 Extend Terminal Apron to the North 01-015 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower 01-016 Install Instrument Landing System

2. List proposed project(s) not required to have an airspace determination

01-004 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment 01-005 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 01-010 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard

Management Plan 01-012 Update Airport Master Plan Study 01-013 Conduct Environmental Assessment 01-017 PFC Administration Costs

*****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************************************** Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency’s finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA’s nonconcurrance below. ******************************************************************************************************************* III. Environmental Findings

1. List proposed project(s) which are categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental review:

01-001 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 01-002 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 01-003 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 01-004 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment 01-005 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 01-006 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension 01-007 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 01-008 Expand Terminal Building 01-009 Reconfigure Access Road 01-010 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management

Plan 01-011 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 01-012 Update Airport Master Plan Study 01-013 Conduct Environmental Assessment 01-014 Extend Terminal Apron to the North 01-016 Install Instrument Landing System 01-017 PFC Administration Costs

2. Date of FAA Finding of No Significant Impact: _______________

(repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding:

01-015 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower – June 4, 2010

3. Date of FAA environmental record of decision: ________________

(repeat as necessary) List proposed project(s) covered by this finding:

*****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************************************* Public agency information confirmed? YES [ ] PARTIALLY [ ] NO [ ] For each project which the ADO/RO disagrees with the public agency’s finding, discuss the reason(s) for the FAA’s nonconcurrance below. ******************************************************************************************************************* Application Reviewed by: ____________________________ ____________________ _________________ Name Routing Symbol Date

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

I. 2014 Final Enplanement Report

II. 2015 Preliminary Enplanement Report

III. Airport Authority PFC Resolution

IV. Financial Summaries

ATCO - Nonscheduled/On-Demand Air Carriers, filing FAA Form 1800-31. Aero Jet Services LLC (J7EA) 0 4 4 Flexjet Llc (J7SA) 0 96 96 ATCO Total 0 100 100 CRAC - Large Certificated Air Carriers, filing T-100. Allegiant Air LLC (G4) 314,244 0 314,244 Falcon Air Express (FCQ) 0 11,946 11,946 Frontier Airlines, Inc. (F9) 0 151 151 Miami Air International, Inc. (GL) 0 10,141 10,141 Republic Airlines (YX#) 0 27 27 Swift Air, Llc (09Q) 0 296 296 CRAC Total 314,244 22,561 336,805

SITE TOTAL 314,244 22,661 336,905

Selection Criteria: , LOCID: PGD, Year: 2014 Page 1 of 1

FAA - Office Of AirportsReport Date 01/29/2016

Source CY 2014FAA ACAIS

Enplanements by Air Carrier for Calendar Year 2014Punta Gorda (PGD)

PGDGary Quill28000 A-1 Airport Rd, Punta Gorda, FL 33982

SCHEDULE TYPE |--------------- ENPLANEMENTS ----------------|CARRIER NAME (CARRIER CODE) SCHEDULED NONSCHEDULED TOTAL

Charlotte County Airport AuthorityPunta Gorda AirportSummary of PFC Projects ‐ Application #1

Project Total State PFC Total

No. Project Title AIP Grant(s) 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Future AIP Funds Funds Local Funds Project Cost

Impose and Use Projects:

01‐001 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 22, 24 2,507,364 376,104 2,883,468 ‐ 151,761 3,035,229

01‐002 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 23, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31 111,240 68,073 120,687 500,000 500,000 264,877 1,564,877 41,181 41,181 1,647,239

01‐003 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 26 2,390,250 2,390,250 42,280 83,533 2,516,063

01‐004 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment 31, 33 535,101 472,478 1,007,579 26,248 54,412 1,088,239

01‐005 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 31 86,260 86,260 ‐ 56,040 142,300

01‐006 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension 31 62,769 62,769 ‐ 3,304 66,073

01‐007 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 31 29,355 29,355 ‐ 1,545 30,900

01‐008 Expand Terminal Building 32, 33, Future 590,927 6,457,631 686,424 7,734,982 1,095,793 819,158 460,577 10,110,510

01‐009 Reconfigure Access Road 32 417,362 417,362 23,187 23,186 79,724 543,459

01‐010 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan 32 124,200 124,200 6,900 6,900 138,000

01‐011 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 34 2,459,913 2,459,913 136,662 136,662 2,733,237

01‐012 Update Airport Master Plan Study 35 978,971 978,971 54,387 54,388 1,087,746

01‐013 Conduct Environmental Assessment 35 325,255 325,255 18,069 18,070 361,394

01‐014 Extend Terminal Apron to the North Future 2,360,250 2,360,250 131,125 131,125 2,622,500

01‐015 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower N/A ‐ ‐ 832,028 3,328,100 4,160,128

01‐016 Install Instrument Landing System N/A ‐ ‐ 297,791 1,691,163 1,988,954

01‐017 PFC Application Costs N/A ‐ ‐ 58,910 58,910

01‐019 PFC Administration Costs N/A ‐ ‐ 3,590 3,590

Impose Only Project:

01‐018 Mitigate Wetlands Future 2,250,000 2,250,000 ‐ 2,750,000 5,000,000

Totals 2,507,364 111,240 376,104 68,073 2,390,250 120,687 500,000 500,000 978,362 1,132,489 6,930,109 2,459,913 1,304,226 5,296,674 24,675,491 1,575,832 5,523,584 5,559,564 37,334,471

Local Match 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

Grant Status Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Open Open Open Open

AIP Grants

passenger facility charge application #1 county airport authority (ccaa) punta gorda airport (pgd)...

Documents