patient safety/ quality improvement project overview
DESCRIPTION
Patient Safety/ Quality Improvement Project Overview. Ariane Marie-Mitchell, MD, PhD, MPH. Health Care Problem. State reason for action Provide supporting data if available. Example: Health Care Problem. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Patient Safety/Quality Improvement
Project OverviewAriane Marie-Mitchell,
MD, PhD, MPH
Health Care Problem
• State reason for action• Provide supporting data if available
Example: Health Care Problem
There is a much longer delay for 1st dose delivery of antibiotics ordered between 11pm and 7am compared to day time averages
This results in wasted time from the nurses and pharmacists, wasted medications, and poor quality of patient care
3
Historical Data – The Problem
4
Stakeholder Analysis• Who is involved? Who is affected?• Try Mind Mapping• Start interviewing- qualitative baseline data
StakeholderAnalysis
ProvidersNurses
Pharmacists
Patients
Patientfamilies
Admin./PSR
Couriers
Charge nurse
• What are you trying to accomplish?• Specify
– numeric goals (how good?)– time frame (by when?)– patient population/system (for whom?)
Define the Aim
K. Shannon, 2012
Aim for Quality Health CareSafe — Avoid injuries to patients from the care that is intended to help them. Safety must be at the forefront of patient care.Timely — Reduce waiting for both patients and those who give care. Prompt attention benefits both the patient and the caregiver. Effective — Match care to science; avoid overuse of ineffective care and underuse of effective care. Efficient — Reduce waste. The health care system should constantly seek to reduce the waste and the cost of supplies, equipment, space, capital, ideas, time and opportunities. Equitable — Close racial and ethnic gaps in health status. Race, ethnicity, gender and income should not prevent anyone from receiving high-quality care.
Patient-Centered — Honor the individual and respect choice. Each patient’s culture, social context and specific needs deserve respect, and the patient should play an active role in making decisions about her own care.
IOM, 2001
Example. Specific Aim
• “Decrease delivery delay in 1st dose antibiotic by 50% between 2300 and 0700 on units 6100-6300 by February 20, 2012”
Identify Measures of Change
• Outcome Measurese.g. Duration of delay in administration of 1st dose antibiotics
• Process Measurese.g. % of antibiotic following forms fillede.g. % of fax orders with telephone follow-up
• Balancing Measurese.g. Staff satisfaction
10
• Fishbone Diagrams• Flowcharts
Cause-Effect Analysis
Constructing a Fishbone Cause and Effect Diagram
– Get the right people in the room– State and clarify the “effect”– Brainstorm list for 4 Ms/P involved in the
process or effect interested in– Brainstorm causes for each of these– For each cause ask “why” 5 times to get to
underlying causes
K. Shannon, 2012
K. Shannon, 2012
Example: Fishbone Diagram
Communication
System FailuresMachines
Process
Different levels of knowledge
Poor process understanding
Poor MD RN communication
Understaffed 2300-0700Old fax machines
Repeat orders via fax
Unreliable tube system
Unaware of effect on
ABX Delay
No EMR = extra steps
# of pharmacy units open
14
Constructing a Flowchart
Start/EndStart/End
Process/Task
DecisionDecision
Sequence
Input/Output
Delay
Document
Prescription RenewalThe process begins when the patient requests renewal.The Product of Value is that the prescription is delivered.
(need more info)
(enough info provided)
Name, DOB, Medication, Dose,Frequency, Pharmacy
Review chart: medication sheet, last visit, next visit, other parent or pharmacy info
Call patient
Phone call
Call for Medicaid Prior Approval
Discuss with clinician
(consistent) (not consistent)
(PA not needed) (PA needed)
Page 2
Example:Flowchart
Select Change• Focus on a change concept
eliminate waste, improve work flow, optimize inventory, change work environment, improve patient interface, manage time, reduce variation, improve error proofing, improve service
• Perform effort vs yield analysis
Low effortLow yield
High effortLow yield
High effortHigh yield
Low effortHigh yield
Evidence Review
• Identify relevant literature or best practice models
• Who else has thought about this problem and tried to fix?
• Critically appraise and describe how relates to your project aim
Example: Evidence ReviewBackground • Pneumonia = 600, 000 Medicare hospitalizations/yr• Previous Medicare Guidelines recommend antibiotic treatment within 8 hrs of
hospital arrival. Methods • Retrospective cohort study design
– 18, 209 Medicare patients (>65 yrs) hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (July 1998-March 1999)
– Outcomes: 1) severity-adjusted mortality (in hospital and 30 day)2) readmission within 30 days of discharge3) length of stay (LOS)
Conclusions • Antibiotic administration <4 hours of arrival was associated with
decreased mortality and LOS among a random sample of older inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia who had not received antibiotics as outpatients.
Houck, P, et al. Timing of Antibiotic Administration and Outcomes for Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:637-644. 19
Test a Change
Who,What,When, Where
CollectData
Repeat,Tweak,Stop
AnalyzeResults
Act Plan
Study Do
A PS D
APS
DD SP A
Plan• Specify a hypothesis• Use SMART ObjectivesSpecific - have a single purposeMeasurable - tied to a result statementAttainable/realistic - know your barriers and resourcesResponsibilities clear – tie names to each objectiveTime connected - clear completion dates (consider creating a timeline)
1. Interview charge nurse, nurses, couriers and pharmacists during a full overnight shift (11p-7a) by day 7- Jose
2. Conduct a literature review of best practices by day 7- Paymonh3. Meet as a team to do cause-effect analysis by day 9- team4. Collect quantitative data on initial state using Form 1a by day
10- Brent and Craig5. Meet as a team to discuss potential interventions by day 12-
team6. Discuss intervention plan with pharmacists, couriers and nurses
and implement by day 16- Jose and Paymohn 7. Collect quantitative data on follow-up state using Forms 1b and
2a by day 20 and analyze- Brent and Craig
Example: SMART Objectives
22
Do
• Two types of data1. Qualitative
e.g. interviews, focus groups, suggestion boxesshow quotations, summarize themes
2. Quantitativee.g. anything that can be countedshow run charts, bar charts, pie charts…
• How did you collect the data?• What sample did you use and what was your
reasoning?
Study
• Qualitative Data• Quantitative
Data– What did you
learn?– Where does this
lead you?
Example: Qualitative Data1. Parents observed speech problems by age 4 and as young as
11 months “Around 10 months I noticed she was not starting to talk like my other
children did”
2. A minority of children received Early Intervention “I asked the doctor about it but they were just like oh, he’ll grow out
of it” “We were supposed to have a lady come to the house and stuff but it
was impossible because I was working full-time and he was at daycare”
May June July August September October November December Janurary February March0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
55%
75%
84% 85% 85% 85%
91% 91% 90%
97%
21%
47%
93%
87% 87%93%
100% 100%
93%
100%95% 95%
All PracticesOur DataGoal (95%)Pe
rcentage
Example: Quantitative Data
Added BMI% to vitals
Incorporated BMI% into nursing data collection
Automated BMI% calculation
Act
• How does your data inform your understanding of the health care problem?
• How does your data influence your interpretation of how to improve the system?
• What will you do next?
Sustainability
• What barriers do you perceive to sustaining the change?
• What resources are available to sustain the change?
• What is the cost-benefit of the old process versus the new process?
References
• References for literature cited• Names of faculty/staff interviewed• Location of sites where processes observed, or
any other relevant info
Quality ResearchImprovement
Aim(s)Hypotheses
MethodsMeasures
Next steps
Results
Act Plan
Study Do
A PS D
APS
DD SP A
≠
Quality Improvement• Intervention is
demonstrated, known, or widely accepted
• Project limited to implementing a practice to improve quality of care
• Performance data collected for clinical, practical or administrative purposes only
Research• Systematic investigation
designed to contribute to generalizable knowledge
• Project involves introducing an untested intervention and data is being collected to establish scientific evidence of its efficacy
IRB approval required *** IRB approval not requiredbut ask if uncertain or if considering publication
IHI Open School QI Practicum
• Optional• Receive additional guidance and a Certificate
– Sign agreement with faculty mentor– Submit aim/plan and receive feedback– Submit cause-effect diagram, PDSA cycles, run
chart, and summary