percentage of sales approach:

53
Percentage of sales approach: COMPUTERFIELD CORPORATION Financial Statements Income statement Balance sheet Sales $12,0 00 C A $5000 Debt $8250 Costs 9,800 FA $7000 Equit y $3750 Net Income $2,20 0 Tota l $1200 0 Total $1200 0 1

Upload: cianna

Post on 23-Feb-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Percentage of sales approach:. EFN and Capacity Usage. Suppose COMPUTERFIELD is operating at 75% capacity: 1. What would be sales at full capacity? (1p) 2. What is the capital intensity ratio at full capacity? (1p) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Percentage of sales approach:

13-1

Percentage of sales approach:COMPUTERFIELD CORPORATION

Financial Statements

Income statement Balance sheet

Sales $12,000 C A $5000 Debt $8250

Costs 9,800 FA $7000 Equity $3750

Net Income $2,200 Total $12000 Total $12000

Page 2: Percentage of sales approach:

13-2

EFN and Capacity UsageSuppose COMPUTERFIELD is

operating at 75% capacity: 1. What would be sales at full

capacity? (1p) 2. What is the capital intensity

ratio at full capacity? (1p)3. What is EFN at full capacity and

Dividend payout ratio is 25%?(ignore accounts payable) (1p)

Page 3: Percentage of sales approach:

Q 1:12,000/.75=16,000; Full capacity as % increase16,000/12,000 = 1.33 Income statementSales $12,000Costs $9,800N I $2,200Ret earnings 2,200*.75=1,650New ret earnings

1,650*1.33=2,195.5There is no indication that any

changes took place in % cost for the proforma income statement, we can get the same result by increasing RE or by creating proforma IS

13-3

Page 4: Percentage of sales approach:

New assets neededCA5000*1.33=6,650TA =6,650+700013,650capital intensity ratio at full capacity =13,650/16,000 =0.8531EFN =0 change in TA = 1650 which

is less than the retained earnings, we can fully finance internally full capacity operation. 13-4

Balance sheet

C A $5000

Debt $8250

FA $7000

Equity $3750

Total $12000

Total $12000

Page 5: Percentage of sales approach:

StatisticsAverage and std deviation of

returns (2p)Z score for first year return (1p)

13-5

Priceyear 0 102year 1 110year 2 98year 3 120year 4 115

Page 6: Percentage of sales approach:

16000; 33% increase in sales CA increase 1650capital intensity =.8531

Price Returns percentageyear 0 102 year 1 110 0.078431 7.843137year 2 98 -0.10909 -10.9091year 3 120 0.22449 22.44898year 4 115 -0.04167 -4.16667 Aver 3.80409 Std 14.65101 Z-sc 0.275684

Page 7: Percentage of sales approach:

13-7

Percentage of sales approach:COMPUTERFIELD CORPORATION

Financial Statements

Income statement Balance sheet

Sales $12,000 C A $5000 Debt $8250

Costs 9,800 FA $7000 Equity $3750

Net Income $2,200 Total $12000 Total $12000

Page 8: Percentage of sales approach:

RETURN RISK AND THE SECURITY MARKET LINEHTTP://WWW.QUANTFINANCEJOBS.COM/JOBDETAILS.ASP?DBID=&GUID=&JOBID=9913

HTTP://WWW.QUANTSPOT.COM/JOBS/TORONTO

Chapter 13

Page 9: Percentage of sales approach:

Chapter OutlineExpected Returns and Variances

of a portfolioAnnouncements, Surprises, and

Expected ReturnsRisk: Systematic and

UnsystematicDiversification and Portfolio RiskSystematic Risk and BetaThe Security Market Line (SML)

Page 10: Percentage of sales approach:

Expected Returns (1)

Expected returns are based on the probabilities of possible outcomes

Expected means average if the process is repeated many times

10

n

iiiRpRE

1

)(

Expected return = return on a risky asset expected in the future

Page 11: Percentage of sales approach:

Expected Returns (2)

11

Probability Expected returnStock A Stock B

Boom 0.2 20% 15%Normal 0.4 10% 8%

Recession -5% 2%

• RA =

• RB =

• If the risk-free rate = 3.2%, what is the risk premium for each stock?

Page 12: Percentage of sales approach:

Variance and Standard Deviation (1)

Unequal probabilities can be used for the entire range of possibilities

Weighted average of squared deviations

12

n

iii RERp

1

22 ))((σ

Page 13: Percentage of sales approach:

Variance and Standard Deviation (2)

Consider the previous example. What is the variance and standard deviation for each stock?

Stock A

Stock B13

Page 14: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolios

The risk-return trade-off for a portfolio is measured by the portfolio expected return and standard deviation, just as with individual assets

14

Portfolio = a group of assets held by an investor

Portfolio weights = Percentage of a portfolio’s total value in a particular asset

Page 15: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio WeightsSuppose you have $ 20,000 to invest

and you have purchased securities in the following amounts. What are your portfolio weights in each security?◦$5,000 of A

◦$9,000 of B

◦$5,000 of C

◦$1,000 of D15

Page 16: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio Expected Returns (1)The expected return of a portfolio is

the weighted average of the expected returns for each asset in the portfolio

You can also find the expected return by finding the portfolio return in each possible state and computing the expected value

16

m

jjjP REwRE

1

)()(

Page 17: Percentage of sales approach:

Expected Portfolio Returns (2)Consider the portfolio weights

computed previously. If the individual stocks have the following expected returns, what is the expected return for the portfolio?◦A: 19.65%◦B: 8.96%◦C: 9.67%◦D: 8.13%

E(RP) =

17

Page 18: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio Variance (1)Steps:1. Compute the portfolio return for

each state:RP = w1R1 + w2R2 + … + wnRn

2. Compute the expected portfolio return using the same formula as for an individual asset

3. Compute the portfolio variance and standard deviation using the same formulas as for an individual asset

18

Page 19: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio Variance (2)Consider the following

informationInvest 60% of your money in Asset

A◦State Probability A B

◦Boom .5 70%10%

◦Recession .5 -20%30%

1. What is the expected return and standard deviation for each asset?

2. What is the expected return and standard deviation for the portfolio?

19

Page 20: Percentage of sales approach:

Solution:

20

Page 21: Percentage of sales approach:

Another Way to Calculate Portfolio VariancePortfolio variance can also be

calculated using the following formula:

Correlation is a statistical measure of how 2 assets move in relation to each other

If the correlation between stocks A and B = -1, what is the standard deviation of the portfolio?

ULULULUULLP CORRxxxx ,22222 2

21

Page 22: Percentage of sales approach:

Solution:

22

Page 23: Percentage of sales approach:

Different Correlation Coefficients (1)

23

Page 24: Percentage of sales approach:

Different Correlation Coefficients (2)

13-24

Page 25: Percentage of sales approach:

Different Correlation Coefficients(3)

25

Page 26: Percentage of sales approach:

Possible Relationships between Two Stocks

26

Page 27: Percentage of sales approach:

Diversification (1)There are benefits to

diversification whenever the correlation between two stocks is less than perfect (p < 1.0)

If two stocks are perfectly positively correlated, then there is simply a risk-return trade-off between the two securities.

27

Page 28: Percentage of sales approach:

Diversification (2)

28

Page 29: Percentage of sales approach:

Expected vs. Unexpected Returns

Expected return from a stock is the part of return that shareholders in the market predict (expect)

The unexpected return (uncertain, risky part):◦At any point in time, the unexpected

return can be either positive or negative

◦Over time, the average of the unexpected component is zero

29

Total return = Expected return + Unexpected return

Page 30: Percentage of sales approach:

Announcements and NewsAnnouncements and news

contain both an expected component and a surprise component

It is the surprise component that affects a stock’s price and therefore its return

30

Announcement = Expected part + Surprise

Page 31: Percentage of sales approach:

Systematic RiskRisk factors that affect a large

number of assets

Also known as non-diversifiable risk or market risk

Examples: changes in GDP, inflation, interest rates, general economic conditions

31

Page 32: Percentage of sales approach:

Unsystematic RiskRisk factors that affect a limited

number of assets

Also known as diversifiable risk and asset-specific risk

Includes such events as labor strikes, shortages.

32

Page 33: Percentage of sales approach:

ReturnsUnexpected return = systematic

portion + unsystematic portion

Total return can be expressed as follows:

Total Return = expected return + systematic portion + unsystematic portion

33

Page 34: Percentage of sales approach:

Effect of Diversification Portfolio diversification is the

investment in several different asset classes or sectors

Diversification is not just holding a lot of assets

34

Principle of diversification = spreading an investment across a number of assets eliminates some, but not all of the risk

Page 35: Percentage of sales approach:

The Principle of DiversificationDiversification can substantially

reduce the variability of returns without an equivalent reduction in expected returns

Reduction in risk arises because worse than expected returns from one asset are offset by better than expected returns from another

There is a minimum level of risk that cannot be diversified away and that is the systematic portion 35

Page 36: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio Diversification (1)

36

Page 37: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio Diversification (2)

37

Page 38: Percentage of sales approach:

Diversifiable (Unsystematic) Risk

The risk that can be eliminated by combining assets into a portfolio

If we hold only one asset, or assets in the same industry, then we are exposing ourselves to risk that we could diversify away

The market will not compensate investors for assuming unnecessary risk

38

Page 39: Percentage of sales approach:

Total RiskThe standard deviation of returns

is a measure of total risk

For well diversified portfolios, unsystematic risk is very small

Consequently, the total risk for a diversified portfolio is essentially equivalent to the systematic risk

39

Page 40: Percentage of sales approach:

Systematic Risk PrincipleThere is a reward for bearing risk

There is no reward for bearing risk unnecessarily

The expected return (and the risk premium) on a risky asset depends only on that asset’s systematic risk since unsystematic risk can be diversified away

40

Page 41: Percentage of sales approach:

Measuring Systematic RiskBeta (β) is a measure of systematic risk

Interpreting beta:◦β = 1 implies the asset has the same

systematic risk as the overall market◦β < 1 implies the asset has less

systematic risk than the overall market

◦β > 1 implies the asset has more systematic risk than the overall market 41

Page 42: Percentage of sales approach:

High and Low Betas

42

Page 43: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio BetasConsider the previous example

with the following four securities◦Security Weight Beta◦A .1333.69

◦B .2 0.64◦C .2671.64

◦D .4 1.79What is the portfolio beta?

43

Page 44: Percentage of sales approach:

Beta and the Risk PremiumThe higher the beta, the greater

the risk premium should be

The relationship between the risk premium and beta can be graphically interpreted and allows to estimate the expected return

44

Page 45: Percentage of sales approach:

Consider a portfolio consisting of asset A and a risk-free asset. Expected return on asset A is 20%, it has a beta = 1.6. Risk-free rate = 8%.

45

Page 46: Percentage of sales approach:

Portfolio Expected Returns and Betas

46

Rf

Page 47: Percentage of sales approach:

Reward-to-Risk Ratio: The reward-to-risk ratio is the

slope of the line illustrated in the previous slide◦Slope = (E(RA) – Rf) / (A – 0)◦Reward-to-risk ratio =

If an asset has a reward-to-risk ratio = 8?

If an asset has a reward-to-risk ratio = 7?

47

Page 48: Percentage of sales approach:

The Fundamental ResultThe reward-to-risk ratio must be

the same for all assets in the market

If one asset has twice as much systematic risk as another asset, its risk premium is twice as large

48

M

fM

A

fA RRERRE

)()(

Page 49: Percentage of sales approach:

Security Market Line (1)The security market line (SML) is

the representation of market equilibrium

The slope of the SML is the reward-to-risk ratio: (E(RM) – Rf) / M

The beta for the market is always equal to one, the slope can be rewritten

Slope = E(RM) – Rf = market risk premium

49

Page 50: Percentage of sales approach:

Security Market Line (2)

50

Page 51: Percentage of sales approach:

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

The capital asset pricing model defines the relationship between risk and return

E(RA) = Rf + A(E(RM) – Rf)

If we know an asset’s systematic risk, we can use the CAPM to determine its expected return

51

Page 52: Percentage of sales approach:

CAPMConsider the betas for each of the

assets given earlier. If the risk-free rate is 4.5% and the market risk premium is 8.5%, what is the expected return for each?Security Beta Expected Return

A 3.6B .7C 1.7D 1.9

52

Page 53: Percentage of sales approach:

Factors Affecting Expected Return

Time value of money – measured by the risk-free rate

Reward for bearing systematic risk – measured by the market risk premium

Amount of systematic risk – measured by beta

53