performance appraisal and wellbeing in the workplace - business breakfast
TRANSCRIPT
Friday 30th September
The Growth Hub Business Breakfast
Time to Sack the annual appraisal?
David DawsonThe Business School
University of [email protected]
www.linkedin.com/in/daviddawsonatwork
The rise and rise of the performance appraisal
1992 (Bevan and Thompson)
1998 (Armstrong and Baron)
2009 (CIPD) 2015 (CEB)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage of Organisations Performing Annual Ap-praisals
Appraisals: “Done but done badly”?
• Only 20% of HR professionals agreed that PA impacted individual performance
• And 21% agreed that it impacted organisational performance
• Circa 55% of employees think that their performance appraisal process is unfair
• Deloitte reports that 58% organisations don’t think PA is an effective use of time
• IES echoes continuing dissatisfaction with appraisals especially from managers
Who’s sacking the annual appraisal
• CEB reports that in 2011 1% of fortune 500 firms were ending annual performance appraisals
• By 2016 that was 12%• Deloitte survey shows that 70% of organisations are reviewing
PA• Notable examples:– Adobe – touch points– Accenture – project based feedback– Deloitte – project based feedback and weekly check ins– Microsoft - connects– GE – app based PD@GE
The new performance appraisal
• Simple
• Accessible (use apps)
• Useful feedback (timely & regular)
• Emphasises enhancement through coaching (looks
forward)
• Supports managers’ skills first
• De-couples pay
Contact Me
David DawsonThe Business SchoolPark CampusUniversity of [email protected]/in/daviddawsonatwork
Physical activity and wellbeing in the workplace
Deborah Potts - CEOMatt Coldrey – Workplace Activity Consultant30th September 2016
We’re here today to:• Convince you that you should be prioritising an
active workforce
• Help you understand the barriers that exist to this and how you as businesses can help
• Show you how we can help
Vision: everyone in Gloucestershire active every day
Who are Active Gloucestershire?
What we doInsight Making activity happen Funding
DemographicsMarket research
Behaviour changeImpact evaluation
Consultation
NetworkingTrainingAdvice
Toolkits and templatesEvents
ChallengesCampaigns
Activity finder
Bid writingFunding
ConsultancyInvestment readiness
New funding
Benefits of activity for businesses
Issues faced by businesses• Absenteeism– Costs UK businesses £32bn per year
• Presenteeism– Twice the cost of absenteeism
• Employee retention– Costs UK business £4bn per year
• Low employee productivity– Output per hour worst since records began
• Poor team cohesion and working relationships
Influence of physical activity• Reducing risk of chronic illness• Alleviating symptoms of mental illness• Boosts immune system• Kick starts metabolism and increases energy
levels• Improves staff moral and team cohesion• Increases creative though, cognitive
performance and improves memory• Improves mood and coping• Helps to reduce stress levels
Influence of physical activity
So what’s stopping you?
Barriers to physical activity• British working culture• Physical environment• Individuals’ attitudes• Lack of time• Motivation• Confidence• Poor experiences• Lack of opportunity and resource
What can you do?
What can you do?
How can Active Gloucestershire help?
• Surveys for your staff• Case studies and best practice• Health and wellbeing charter• Toolkits and templates• Networks and sharing• Challenges and events• Volunteering opportunities• Bespoke plans• Team building• Bespoke
We need to be in it together
But.....................................................................
We want you to:• Commit to be part of our movement for change
• Work with us and others to explore how to create an active workforce
• Share your learning
An Active Gloucestershirewill be a more
Productive,Positive
& Vibrant place
to liveand work
Thank you
The Cost of Inactivity to Business
• Absenteeism– Costs UK businesses £32bn per year
• Presenteeism– Twice the cost of absenteeism
• Employee retention– Costs UK business £4bn per year
• Low employee productivity– Output per hour worst since records began
• Poor team cohesion and working relationships
