peritonsillar abscess: i&d vs needle aspiration mandisa mciver, md cohen children’s medical...
TRANSCRIPT
Peritonsillar Abscess:
I&D vs Needle Aspiration
Mandisa McIver, MDCohen Children’s Medical Center of New York
Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Outline
Definition of peritonsillar abscess (PTA)
ED management options
Literature Review
Summary/Recommendations
Definition
Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) Collection of pus within the space between the
tonsil and the superior constrictor muscle Most common deep infection of head and neck Adolescents, adults
ED Management Options
In many ED settings, the ED physician is treating pts with PTA
Important to know which method is the most successful with the least number of complications
Carotid artery may sit millimeters away from the posterior extent of the PTA.
The DebateNeedle Aspiration
? Easier to perform
? Minimal trauma
? Well tolerated by pts
Risk of puncture to Carotid A, Jugular V, Parotid Gland
I&D
? More definitive
? More painful
? Risk of pulmonary aspiration of pus
Adult Literature Review
Adult literature has multiple studies
I&D vs needle aspiration
Primary Outcome Acute resolution of illness
Secondary Outcomes Recurrence rate Pain Complications- bleeding, pulmonary aspiration
Adult Literature ReviewSuccess Rates
Spires et al, 1987, 62 pts I&D (100%), Needle Aspiration (95%)
Stringer et al, 1988, 52 pts I&D (93%), Needle Aspiration (92%)
Maharaj et al, 1991, 60 pts I&D (90%), Needle Aspiration (87%)
No significant statistical difference
Adult Literature ReviewSuccess Rates
Wolf, et al, 1994
74 pts had I&D
86 pts had needle aspiration
I&D group: no immediate recurrence 3/74 (4%) had late recurrent episode
Needle aspiration group: 24/86 had single needle aspiration 38/86 had a repeat needle aspiration 24/86 (23%) had 2 or more repeat needle
aspirations
Statistically significant difference in recurrence rate
Literature Review
Johnson, et al, 2003
Medline search, 42 articles
Overall PTA recurrence rate is 10-15%
Concluded that both needle aspiration and incision and drainage are effective for initial management
Management is the same for adults and cooperative children
Pediatric Literature Review
Weinberg E, et al 1993, Prospective study, 3 year period
43 children with PTA, ages 7-18 yr
All treated with needle aspiration
94% success rate
No bleeding/airway/anesthetic complications
Pediatric Literature Review
Schraff, et al, 2001, retrospective chart review, 10 year period
83 children with PTA, (10m-18y), seen by ENT
51% treated in ED
42 I&D, 12 needle aspiration (2 required 2nd needle aspiration)
No recurrent PTAs
Pediatric Literature Review
Recommendations:
Cooperative child: Consider conscious sedation
Uncooperative child: CT scan or US Conscious sedation or OR
Hx of previous PTA, recurrent tonsillitis, OSA OR for tonsillectomy
Summary/Recommendations
Both needle aspiration and I&D are effective management options for drainage of PTAs
Similar success rates
Appropriate f/u is necessary for possible repeat drainage
Children are more challenging and therefore may require sedation or OR management
References
Johnson, FR, et al. An evidence-based review of the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:332-43
Maharaj D, et al. Management of peritonsillar abscess. J Laryngol Otol. 1991 Sep;105(9)743-5
Stringer SP, et al. A randomized trial for outpatient management of peritonsillar abscess. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Mar;114(3):296-8
Spires JR, et al. Treatment of peritonsillar abscess. A prospective study of aspiration vs incision and drainage. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Sep;113(9):984-6.
Viljoen, M, Loock, JW. Quinsy treated by aspiration: the volume of pus at initial aspiration is an accurate predictor of the need for subsequent re-aspiration. Clin Otolaryngol. 2007, 32, 98-102.
Wolf M, et al. Peritonsillar abscess: repeated needle aspiration versus incision and drainage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994 Jul:103(7):554-7
Weinberg E, et al. Needle aspiration of peritonsillar abscess in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993. Feb:119(2)169-72.
Schraff, S, et al. Peritonsillar abscess in children: a 10-year review of diagnosis and management. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 57 (2001) 213-218.
References
Apostolopoulos NJ, et al. Peritonsillar abscess in children. Is incision and drainage an effective management? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995 Mar;31(2-3):129-35.
Herzon, FS. Harris P. Mosher Award thesis. Peritonsillar abscess: incidence, current management practices, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Laryngoscope. 1995 Aug;105(8 Pt Suppl 74):1-17.
Ozbek C, et al. Use of steroids in the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. June 2004, Vol 118, pp.439-442
Friedman NR, et al. Peritonsillar abscess in early childhood. Presentation and management. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123:630-632
Scott PM, et al. Diagnosis of peritonsillar infections: a prospective study of ultrasound, computerized tomography and clinical diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol 1999; 113:229-23
Ramirez-Schrempp, et al. Ultrasound Soft Tissue Applications in the Pediatric Emergency Department. To drain or not to drain? Pediatric Emergency Care. Vol 25, Number 1, Jan 2009.
Bauer, et al. The safety of conscious sedation in peritonsillar abscess drainage. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Vol 127. Dec 2001