peru out of step incident r2 cfh markup

Upload: jeremias-ponce-montalvo

Post on 14-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    1/27

    An Out-of-Step Event in thePeruvian Power System

    Yofre JacomeCOES SINAC

    Peru

    Western Protective Relaying Conference

    October, 2007

    Charles HenvilleHenville Consulting

    Inc.

    Presented by

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    2/27

    2

    Overview

    Background on loss of stability

    Impact on system voltages

    Differential or distance protection

    October 2002 Event

    Disturbance records

    Actions since the disturbance

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    3/27

    3

    Relevant factors

    Voltage fluctuations

    Limitations of differential protection

    systems

    Benefits of modern multifunction relays

    Reasons for operating limits

    Benefits of remedial action schemes

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    4/27

    4

    Weak interconnections

    System A

    Y MVASystem B

    Z MVA (Z>Y)

    Weak tie

    (Rated capability

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    5/27

    5

    Example system

    Line ALine B

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    6/27

    6

    Equal area criterion (stable)

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 50 100 150

    Angle (Degrees)

    Power(PU)

    Pre-faultPost-fault

    Fault

    Acceleration

    area

    Decceleration

    area

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    7/27

    7

    Damped recovery oscillations

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    time (s)

    Angle(Degrees)

    Oscillations leading to

    stable equilibrium

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    8/27

    8

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 50 100 150Angle (Degrees)

    Power(PU)

    Pre-faultPost-fault

    Fault

    Acceleration

    area

    Deccel'n.

    area

    Equal area criterion (unstable)

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    9/27

    9

    Angular separations of sources

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    time (s)

    Angle(Degrees)

    Loss of synchronism

    Oscillations leading to

    stable equilibrium

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    10/27

    10

    Voltage Oscillations

    d

    P

    Electrical Center

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    11/27

    11

    WECC Planning Standards

    Fi ure W-1 From NERC/WECC Plannin Standards

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    12/27

    12

    d

    P1

    P2

    P3

    P1 : Steady state stability limit

    P2: Transient stability limitP3 : Loss of synchronism

    Relay response to out of step conditions

    Distance Relays

    Differential relays see no fault!

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    13/27

    13

    Controlled Separation

    100 MW

    50 MW

    Grid

    70 MW 30 MW 40 MW

    Electrical Center

    Controlled separation point

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    14/27

    14

    Frequency changes

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    15/27

    15

    An out-of-step event

    At 13:09 hours on 22 October, 2002

    In the South Eastern Region of Peru

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    16/27

    South

    Eastern

    Area

    System

    Diagram

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    17/27

    17

    FAUL

    T

    FAULT

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    18/27

    18

    Event record from faulted line

    (L-1008)

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    19/27

    19

    Moquegua Terminal of L-2030

    Trigger10/09/2002

    01:09:06 PM.380

    t/s-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

    IR R

    -10

    0

    10

    t/s-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

    IS R

    -10

    0

    10

    t/s-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

    IT R

    -10

    0

    10

    t/s-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

    VR R

    -50

    0

    t/s-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

    VS R

    -50

    0

    t/s-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

    VT R

    -50

    0

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    20/27

    20

    Comparison of out-of-step voltages

    t/s17.8 17.9 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6

    K2:Va a_1/V

    -50

    0

    50

    K1:VR R

    -50

    0

    50

    Tintaya V max 1.07 pu

    Moquegua V max 1.00 puMoquegua

    V min 0.85 pu

    Voltage in phase

    Maximum voltage

    Voltage out of phaseMinimum voltage

    Tintaya V min 0.53 pu

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    21/27

    21

    62 Seconds of asynchronous

    interconnection

    Trigger10/09/2002

    01:09:06 PM.380

    t/s10 20 30 40 50 60

    IR R

    -10

    0

    10

    t/s10 20 30 40 50 60

    IS R

    -10

    0

    10

    t/s10 20 30 40 50 60

    IT R

    -10

    0

    10

    t/s10 20 30 40 50 60

    VR R

    -50

    0

    t/s10 20 30 40 50 60

    VS R

    -50

    0

    t/s10 20 30 40 50 60

    VT R

    -50

    0

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    22/27

    22

    Frequency Divergence

    South-eastern

    Frequency

    SEIN Frequency

    Underfrequency

    load shedding

    in SEIN

    Machupicchu

    Generator trip

    Generation

    plant trip

    (by operator)

    SE Area

    load loss

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    23/27

    23

    Actions following the event

    Impose operating limits

    Replaced some protections with new

    systems including out of step blockingand tripping

    Replaced some power system

    stabilizers

    Implemented generation shedding RAS

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    24/27

    24

    Operating Limit Nomograph

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    25/27

    25

    Two different system responses

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    26/27

    26

    Conclusions

    Weak interconnections are exposed to out of

    step conditions

    Out of step conditions should be avoided but, if

    they happen:

    Systems should be separated in a controlled manner

    Load and generation should be balanced in

    separated regions

    Re-synchronization might happen, but it might

    not!

    Real life events validate system models

  • 7/29/2019 Peru Out of Step Incident R2 CFH Markup

    27/27

    27

    Questions?