peter bialobrzeski, shanghai, 2001 (#57). image from h. & d. zielske, nanpu bridge, shanghai,...

11
Peter Bialobrzeski , Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from www.pdnonline.com H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.

Upload: jessica-parsons

Post on 14-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001

(#57). Image from

www.pdnonline.com

H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.

Page 2: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

Bialobrzeski denounced the Zielskes and told websites that the pair had actually called years earlier for advice about exposures, film, and vantage points.

The Zielskes, who claimed in an open letter that the images "had nothing in common," were soon fending off a charge that hasn't been leveled in fine-art circles for a while:

PLAGIARISM.PLAGIARISM.

Bialobrzeski

The Zielskes

Page 3: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

There is a fine line between copying and homage.Homage = Inspiration.Copying = Plagiarism.

Page 4: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

We all know that ideas come from many sources: they recur, regenerate, take new forms, and mutate

into alternative forms. In the world of art and design, there seems to be an

implicit understanding that any original work can and will evolve into the work of others, eventually

working its way into our broader visual culture.

Is it acceptable to use the work of another when it might be a critical part

of the final artifact?

Page 5: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

Visual Plagiarism?

Galliano advert, c. 2007 William Klein, c. 1992

http://www.epuk.org/The-Curve/456/visual-plagiarism

Page 6: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

While copying a process or design may be part of learning and developing your creative process, your finished artifacts must either elaborate an idea or develop and move forward what someone else has done.

You can do this by changing something in the original that will create a unique effect and

new artwork:

Page 7: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

Jeff Koons, String of Puppies, 1988. Polychrome on wood;

62 x 37 ins.

Photograph: Art Rogers, Puppies, 1985. Offset lithograph on coated paper; 4 5/8 x 5 3/4 ins. © Art Rogers

http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=6467

Page 8: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

CAN BE DEFINED AS:A quotation of visual media, such as:•artwork•photography•popular culture•music videos•films•technology etc.

By quoting visual media for your own art work, you change its meaning. You create a new context. Your art work has a different meaning from the original.

http://education.qld.gov.au/tal/tips/02523.html

Page 9: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

Examples of Appropriation:

Page 10: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

While copying a process or design may be part of learning and developing your creative process, your finished artifacts must either elaborate an idea or develop and move forward what someone else has done.

You can do this by changing something in the original that will create a unique effect and

new artwork:

Page 11: Peter Bialobrzeski, Shanghai, 2001 (#57). Image from   H. & D. Zielske, Nanpu Bridge, Shanghai, 2002. Image from zielske.de.zielske.de

• http://mikerbaker.com/knack/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/mona_blair_tn.jpg• http://www.faculty.de.gcsu.edu/~dvess/ids/fap/mona7.htm• http://www.art.com/products/p14452957-sa-i1754892/the-mona-lisa-says-goodbye-

when-the-painting-is-stolen-from-the-louvre-paris.htm?sorig=cat&sorigid=0&dimvals=0&ui=1c4d773ed72b42c18668544182f7198d&searchstring=mona+lisa• http://www.art.com/products/p13719389-sa-i2731708/andy-warhol-double-mona-

lisa-c1963.htm?sorig=cat&sorigid=0&dimvals=0&ui=1c4d773ed72b42c18668544182f7198d&searchstring=mona+lisa

Mona Lisa Appropriations citations