pheromones and other semiochemicals of click beetles - a … · 2013. 12. 5. · pheromones and...

of 33 /33
Pheromones and other semiochemicals of click beetles - a European perspective Miklós Tóth Plant Protection Institute, Ctr. Agric. Res. Hung. Acad. Sci., Budapest, Hungary Presented at the ESA Meeting, Knoxville TN, USA, 11-14 November 2012.

Author: others

Post on 30-Dec-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • Pheromones and other semiochemicalsof click beetles - a European

    perspective

    Miklós Tóth

    Plant Protection Institute, Ctr. Agric. Res. Hung.Acad. Sci., Budapest, Hungary

    Presented at the ESA Meeting, KnoxvilleTN, USA, 11-14 November 2012.

  • Wireworms, the larvae of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) areimportant soil-dwelling polyphagous pests all over the world.

    www.naturamediterraneo.com

    www.photoshelter.com

  • Traditional forecast and monitoring involves labour-intensive soilsampling methods,

    Photo L. Furlan

  • and to obtain wireworms from soil samples collected is time-consuming(several days or more). Photo L. Furlan

  • Pheromone-baited traps are much easier and simpler to use.

    However, the pheromonecomposition should be

    identified first!

    On the picture: the YATLOR FUNNEL (or YF ) trap design specifically developed forpheromone trapping of click beetles (Furlan, Inform. Fitopat. 10:49, 2004)

    Photo M. Tóth

  • The very first chemical structures elucidated from click beetles (female-produced pheromone) came from North America and were organic acids

    Pheromone structures - first identifications

    OH

    O

    valeric acid (pentanoicacid)

    Limonius californicus

    (Jacobson, Science 159:208,1968)

    OH

    O

    caproic acid (hexanoicacid)

    Limonius canus

    (Butler, Environ. Entomol. 4:229,1975)

    Limonius californicuswww.bugguide.net

  • In Europe, starting from the eighties, a number of geranyl and farnesylesters were identified mainly by scientists from the Soviet Union.

    Pheromone structures - first identifications

    OO

    geranyl butyrate[(E)-3,7)-dimethyl-2,6-

    octadienyl butyrate]

    i.e. A. sputator

    Example structures:

    O

    O

    (E,E)-farnesyl acetate[(E)-3,7,11)-trimethyl-2,6,10-

    dodecatrienyl acetate]

    i.e. A. ustulatus

    First report on similar structures from: Oleschenko, 1979 (cited inKamm, Coleopt. Bull. 37:16, 1983)

  • In the 1990-s we identified new and revisited known (but inactive)pheromones of elaterids (important in Central and Western Europe)

    Pheromone structures - my lab’s contribution

    4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 min

    IS

    IS

    IS

    IS

    IS

    obscurus

    ustulatus

    sordidus

    litigiosus

    lineatus

    brevis

    sputator

    ger.but.

    IS

    ger.i-val.ger.oct.

    ger.hex. farn.acet.

    farn.but.

    GC analysis of pheromone gland extracts of Agriotes spp.(after Tóth, J. Chem. Ecol.. 28:1641, 2002, and Pest Manag. Sci. 59:417, 2003)

    A. ustulatusA. obscurusA. sordidusA. litigiosusA. lineatusA. brevisA. sputator

    first identification

    improved publishedcompositionconfirmed knowncomposition

    A. rufi-palpisA. proxi-mus

  • One reason for the relativelyfrequent necessity of revisitingpublished structures may be thatmost early identifications werebased on direct gland extracts,which may not necessarilyrepresent composition emittedinto the air by the females.

    Pheromone structures - my lab’s contribution

    supposedpheromoneglands /reservoirs

    ovary

    accessory gland

    bursa

    oviduct

    (After Ivaschenko, Zool. Zh. 59:225,1980).

  • 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 min

    int. std.

    geranyl octanoate

    retention region ofgeranyl butyrate

    Gland extracts of A. lineatus were dominated by a single very large peakof geranyl octanoate, geranyl butyrate was hardly detectable (ratio of

    octanoate:butyrate = 100:

  • geranyl-octanoate

    geranyl-butyrate

    int.std.

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 min

    (After Vuts, Chemoecol. 22:23, 2012)

    In volatile collections the butyrate was well visible (ratio ofoctanoate:butyrate = 100:10)

    Gland extract vs. volatile collection (example No. 1)

    mV

    0

    5

    10

    volatiles

  • Ger

    anyl

    buta

    noat

    e

    Ger

    anyl

    hexa

    noat

    e

    Ger

    anyl

    octa

    noat

    e

    Ner

    ylis

    oval

    erat

    e

    E,E

    -far

    nesy

    lac

    etat

    e

    A.li

    nea

    tus

    Rümlang, May 23 - August 14,1997

    10 - - - - - 030 - - - - - 2

    100 - - - - - 010 1 - - - - 27310 - 1 - - - 210 - - 1 - - 110 - - - 1 - 010 - - - - 1 1

    Ger

    anio

    l

    Total caughtin test:

    279beetles

    In the field the presence of the butyrate was absolutely necessary forattraction.

    Gland extract vs. volatile collection (example No. 1)

    (After Tóth, Pest Manag. Sci. 59:417, 2003)

  • Ger

    anyl

    buta

    noat

    e

    Ger

    anyl

    hexa

    noat

    e

    Ger

    anyl

    octa

    noat

    e

    Ner

    ylis

    oval

    erat

    e

    E,E

    -far

    nesy

    lac

    etat

    e

    A.li

    nea

    tus

    Rümlang, May 23 - August 14,1997

    10 - - - - - 030 - - - - - 2

    100 - - - - - 010 1 - - - - 27310 - 1 - - - 210 - - 1 - - 110 - - - 1 - 010 - - - - 1 1

    Ger

    anio

    l

    Total caughtin test:

    279beetles

    It appears that volatile collections reflect better the true pheromonecomposition of a given species than gland extracts do.

    Gland extract vs. volatile collection (example No. 1)

    (After Tóth, Pest Manag. Sci. 59:417, 2003)

  • Agriotes sordidus

    geranyl hexanoate

    E,E-farnesylhexanoate

    int. std.

    ?

    glands

    volatiles

    15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 50 min

    ratio ger:farn =1:1

    ratio ger:farn =1:

  • Agriotes sordidus

    geranyl hexanoate

    E,E-farnesylhexanoate

    int. std.

    ?

    glands

    volatiles

    15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 50 min

    ratio ger:farn =1:1

    ratio ger:farn =1:

  • Agriotes sordidus

    geranyl hexanoate

    E,E-farnesylhexanoate

    int. std.

    ?

    glands

    volatiles

    15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 50 min

    ratio ger:farn =1:1

    ratio ger:farn =1:

  • Pheromone traps in use in EuropeAs a result of our studies pheromone traps are available for 9 Agriotesspp., (including all of the most important click beetle pests) in Europe.

    Agriotes sputator(geranyl butyrate)

    April May June July August1 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 30 15

    0

    2

    4

    0

    20

    0

    2

    0

    5

    (total caught: 202 beetles)

    A. lineatus(geranyl octanoate + ger.butyrate)

    (total caught: 1202 beetles)

    A. rufipalpis(geranyl hexanoate)

    (total caught: 92 beetles)

    A. ustulatus(E,E)-farnesyl acetate)

    (total caught: 461 beetles)

    mea

    n ca

    tch

    / tra

    p (+

    S.E

    .)

    Debrecen, Hungary, 1999

    (after Szarukán I. et al., unpublished)

  • Pheromone traps in use in Europe

    gallicus catches

    A. sordidus /rufipalpis baitGeranyl hexanoate

    1998 - 2006

    rufipalpis catches

    sordidus catches

    Cidnopus pilosus catch

    no catch

    One application of the traps in recent years was to determine theoccurrence and abundance of the click beetle spp. in Europe.

    (after Furlan, IOBC/wprs Bull. 30:19, 2007)

  • lineatus catches

    proximus catches

    A. lineatus baitGeranyl octanoate + geranylbutyrate

    1998 - 2006

    no catch

    Pheromone traps in use in EuropeOne application of the traps in recent years was to determine the

    occurrence and abundance of the click beetle spp. in Europe.

    (after Furlan, IOBC/wprs Bull. 30:19, 2007)

  • Click beetle pheromone traps capture large numbers of males. In somespecies, however, users reported on the presence of females in the catch!

    Females responding to the pheromone

    The phenomenon most frequently was reportedin:

    A. sordidus and A. brevis –Lorenzo Furlan, Italy

    A. ustulatus – István Szarukán,Hungary

  • On closer scrutiny, beetle catches in pheromone baited traps indeedcontained a sizeable proportion of female beetles in these species!

    Females responding to the pheromone

    A. brevis

    Veneto, Italy, 2001

    pheromone components:(E,E)-farnesyl butyrate +

    geranyl butyrate www.elateridae.com

    A. ustulatuspheromone component:(E,E)-farnesyl acetate

    Eraclea, Italy, 2000

    Total caught: 114 beetles

    A. sordidus

    Berton-Greggio, Italy, 2001

    pheromone component:geranyl hexanoate

    Total caught: 367 beetlesTotal caught: 1173 beetles

  • Female catches in pheromone baited traps were significantly higher thanin unbaited traps.

    Females responding to the pheromone

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    1 0

    1 2

    1 4

    1 6

    BREVbait unbaited

    A. brevis

    Total caught: 194 beetles

    P= 0.0011

    Eraclea, Italy, 2000

    Mea

    n ca

    tche

    s (+

    SE)

    pheromonebait

    pheromone components:(E,E)-farnesyl butyrate +

    geranyl butyrate www.elateridae.com

    A. ustulatus

    P< 0.0001

    pheromone component:(E,E)-farnesyl acetateDebrecen, Hungary, 2003

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2

    mg30 unb(test)

    A. sordidus

    P= 0.0001

    Berton-Greggio, Italy, 2001

    pheromone component:geranyl hexanoate

    Total caught: 42 beetles Total caught: 116 beetles

    0

    1

    2

    3

  • In EAG screenings of synthetic pheromone compounds of click beetles,female antennae showed similar response spectra as male antennae,

    responding best to the respective pheromone component.

    Females responding to the pheromone

    0100200300400500600700800

    control

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    mea

    n no

    rmal

    ized

    res

    pons

    es (

    +SE

    )%

    standard

    pheromone

    (E,E

    )-fa

    rnes

    ylac

    etat

    e(E

    ,E)-

    farn

    esyl

    buty

    rate

    (E,E

    )-fa

    rnes

    ol

    gera

    niol

    gera

    nyl

    buty

    rate

    gera

    nyl

    hexa

    noat

    ege

    rany

    lis

    oval

    erat

    ege

    rany

    loc

    tano

    ate

    air

    Agriotessordidus

  • This suggested that females were capable of detecting their respectivepheromone components.

    Females responding to the pheromone

    control

    mea

    n no

    rmal

    ized

    res

    pons

    es (

    +SE

    )%

    standard

    pheromone

    (E,E

    )-fa

    rnes

    ylac

    etat

    e(E

    ,E)-

    farn

    esyl

    buty

    rate

    (E,E

    )-fa

    rnes

    ol

    gera

    niol

    gera

    nyl

    buty

    rate

    gera

    nyl

    hexa

    noat

    ege

    rany

    lis

    oval

    erat

    ege

    rany

    loc

    tano

    ate

    air

    0

    5 0

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    0

    5 0

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    pheromone

    Agriotesbrevis

  • Female catches in pheromone baited traps showed dose dependence,similar to catches of male beetles.

    Females responding to the pheromone

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    0 10 30 100 mg

    mea

    n / t

    rap

    (+SE

    )m

    ean

    / tra

    p (+

    SE)

    a b c c

    a b bc c

    (total caught:709 beetles)

    (total caught:109 beetles)

    A. sordidusBerton-Greggio, Italy, 2001

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    A. ustulatusCessalto, Italy, 2003

    (total caught:1708 beetles)

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5 (total caught:91 beetles)

    0 10 30 100 mg

    a b bc c

    a ab bc c

  • The demonstrated female attraction to the resp. pheromone brings up thepossibility of developing a trap catching females also.

    Females responding to the pheromone

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    0 10 30 100 mg

    mea

    n / t

    rap

    (+SE

    )m

    ean

    / tra

    p (+

    SE)

    a b c c

    a b bc c

    (total caught:709 beetles)

    (total caught:109 beetles)

    A. sordidusBerton-Greggio, Italy, 2001

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    A. ustulatusCessalto, Italy, 2003

    (total caught:1708 beetles)

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5 (total caught:91 beetles)

    0 10 30 100 mg

    a b bc c

    a ab bc c

  • In the flower visitor A. ustulatus, a floral lure has been discovered, whichattracts both females and males.

    Efficient click beetle traps for both sexes?

    0

    5

    1 0

    mea

    n / t

    rap

    (+SE

    )

    (total caught:935 beetles)

    Debrecen, Hungary, 2006

    0

    5

    1 0

    (total caught:839 beetles)

    Composition of baits:

    (E)-anethol

    (E)-cinnam-aldehyde

    (After Tóth, Acta Phytopath. Hung. 46:235, 2011)

    Sex ratio in catch of the 2component floral lure

    (total caught 1232 beetles)

    = present = absent

  • 0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0

    floral lure

    pheromone

    white colour

    ba

    (total caught:4814 beetles)

    Debrecen, 2008

    f(total caught:2532 beetles)

    f

    Eraclea, 2008

    mea

    n ca

    tch

    +SE

    c

    d

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0 ba

    c

    White colour (a known attractive visual cue for A. ustulatus) showednegligible influence on traps baited with floral or pheromonal lures

    Efficient click beetle traps for both sexes?

    (After Tóth M. et al., in preparation)

  • 0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0

    floral lure

    pheromone

    white colour

    ba

    (total caught:4814 beetles)

    Debrecen, 2008

    f(total caught:2532 beetles)

    f

    Eraclea, 2008

    mea

    n ca

    tch

    +SE

    c

    d

    0

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0 ba

    c

    The addition of the pheromone to the floral lure in the same trapincreased catches of females!

    Efficient click beetle traps for both sexes?

    (After Tóth M. et al., in preparation)

  • ba

    Debrecen, 2008(total caught: 6123 beetles)

    Eraclea, 2008

    mea

    n ca

    tch

    +SE

    Most female specimens were caught in traps with both floral ANDpheromonal baits

    ba

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0

    3 5

    4 0

    4 5

    5 0

    5 5

    6 0

    c

    0

    1 02 0

    3 04 0

    5 06 0

    7 08 0

    9 0100

    110120

    130140

    (total caught: 34325 beetles)

    pheromone

    white colour

    f

    m

    floral lure

    Efficient click beetle traps for both sexes?

    (After Tóth M. et al., in preparation)

  • ba

    Debrecen, 2008(total caught: 6123 beetles)

    Eraclea, 2008

    mea

    n ca

    tch

    +SE

    A similar phenomenon (that the presence of the pheromone increases theeffect of floral bait on females) is unusual with sex pheromones

    ba

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0

    3 5

    4 0

    4 5

    5 0

    5 5

    6 0

    c

    0

    1 02 0

    3 04 0

    5 06 0

    7 08 0

    9 0100

    110120

    130140

    (total caught: 34325 beetles)

    pheromone

    white colour

    f

    m

    floral lure

    Efficient click beetle traps for both sexes?

    (After Tóth M. et al., in preparation)

  • ba

    Debrecen, 2008(total caught: 6123 beetles)

    Eraclea, 2008

    mea

    n ca

    tch

    +SE

    The phenomenon is frequently reported with aggregation pheromones, soelaterid pheromones may have to be reclassified.

    ba

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    3 0

    3 5

    4 0

    4 5

    5 0

    5 5

    6 0

    c

    0

    1 02 0

    3 04 0

    5 06 0

    7 08 0

    9 0100

    110120

    130140

    (total caught: 34325 beetles)

    pheromone

    white colour

    f

    m

    floral lure

    Efficient click beetle traps for both sexes?

    (After Tóth M. et al., in preparation)

  • Acknowledgements

    Scientists cooperating inunpublished results shown:

    Bálintné Csonka, É. (Hungary)Francke, W. (Germany)

    Furlan, L. (Italy)Subchev, M. (Bulgaria)Szarukán, I. (Hungary)Tolasch, T. (Germany)Toshova, T. (Bulgaria)

    Vuts, J. (Hungary)Yatsynin, V.G. (Russia)

    nextpage: firstpage: