philosophy of science

12
The Philosophy of the Social Sciences Introduction The social sciences seek to conduct a science of phenomena that have no mass. At the same time, these sciences must adhere to the logic and rules of science. How is it possible to conduct a science of phenomena that have no

Upload: nikolai

Post on 16-Aug-2015

250 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

DESCRIPTION

philoophy of science

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Introduction

• The social sciences seek to conduct a science of phenomena that have no mass.

• At the same time, these sciences must adhere to the logic and rules of science.

• How is it possible to conduct a science of phenomena that have no mass?

Page 2: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Nominalism: Definitions

• Realism: Abstract concepts are real in their consequences.

• Nominalism: Abstract concepts reflect the logical error of reification: misplaced concreteness based upon unnecessary subjectivity. The concrete is real.

Page 3: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Nominalism: Role of the Scientist

• Realism: Observe, as best as possible, the consequences of abstract reality.

• Nominalism: The social scientist has no other option but to observe the actual behavior of humans. Collective behavior is the simple aggregation of individuals’ behaviors.

Page 4: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Nominalism: Issues Facing Science

• Realism: Challenged by obtaining valid and reliable measures. How does one measure an abstract concept?

• Nominalism: Challenged by understanding collective behavior. What is the basis of social order?

Page 5: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Nominalism: Application

• Realism: Observations and interpretations can be used to understand abstract concepts.

• Nominalism: Observations and interpretations can be used to advance “grounded theory”: theory that can be traced to direct observations of human behavior.

Page 6: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Idealism: Definitions

• Realism: One reality to be observed as best as possible.

• Idealism: Multiple realities, each valid at the same time.

Page 7: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Idealism: Role of the Scientist

• Realism: Observe as best as possible. “Data speak for themselves.”

• Idealism: The scientist has no option except to impose structure upon observations. “Data do not speak for themselves.”

Page 8: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Idealism: Issues Facing Science

• Realism: Can be challenged by aberrations in observations.

• Idealism: Can be challenged by differences in observations.

Page 9: Philosophy of Science

The Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Realism vs. Idealism: Application

• Realism: Observations and interpretations are value neutral (as best as possible).

• Idealism: • Observations and interpretations reflect the

subjectivity of the society. • Interpretations can be used to promote

advocacy.• Scientists are bound by “verstehen.”

Page 10: Philosophy of Science

An Example

Page 11: Philosophy of Science

An Example

Structure-Functionalism

• The Adaptation is the production of food.• The Goals are multiple, with “feed the world” as

the one being given priority.• The appeal to Integration is that “together” we will

achieve our goal.• As a nation with vast resources, we have a moral

obligation (Latent function) to “feed the world.”

Page 12: Philosophy of Science

An Example

Marxian/Critical

• This poster represents an attempt by powerful agribusiness firms to create a “false consciousness” among consumers that their true purpose is to feed the world.

• Instead, these powerful actors seek to distract us from their exploitation of the environment, animals, and our health and well-being so as to maximize their profits.