picovir (pleconaril) nda 21-245 treatment of acute vri in adults (common cold)
TRANSCRIPT
Picovir
(Pleconaril)
NDA 21-245
Treatment of acute VRI in adults
(Common Cold)
Agenda
• Overview of NDA and issues– Russ Fleischer, PA-C, MPH
• Statistical review of efficacy– Thomas Hammerstrom, PhD
• Safety and summary– Russ Fleischer, PA-C, MPH
Clinical Development Program
• VRI NDA 21-245 submitted July 31, 2001– 2 pivotal studies
• 843-043 and 843-044 (400 mg TID x 5 days)
– 4 phase 2 studies
• 843-010 • 843-013 • 843-020• 843-032
Application Issues
• Overall study resultsOverall study results• Patient subgroupsPatient subgroups• Possible analysis populations• Identification of infected patientsIdentification of infected patients• Resistance • Food effect• Safety
Overall Study Results
• Difficulty demonstrating treatment effects Difficulty demonstrating treatment effects – Enteroviral meningitisEnteroviral meningitis– Hand, foot, and mouth diseaseHand, foot, and mouth disease– Early VRI studiesEarly VRI studies
• Phase 3 VRI studies demonstrate Phase 3 VRI studies demonstrate – Median 0.5 day faster time to resolution in all Median 0.5 day faster time to resolution in all
randomized patientsrandomized patients– Median 1.0 day faster time to resolution in Median 1.0 day faster time to resolution in
infected patientsinfected patients
Patient Subgroups
• Discordant results in smokers Discordant results in smokers • Difficulty drawing conclusions in elderly Difficulty drawing conclusions in elderly
patientspatients• Patients with co-morbid conditions
excluded from pivotal studies
Possible Analysis Populations
• Infected (ITT-I) – Identify infected patients– Demonstrate treatment effect– No harm in uninfected
• All randomized (ITT)– More reflective of actual use– Prescribed based on symptoms with no rapid
diagnostic assay– Prescribed to asymptomatic patients
Identification of Infected Patients
Nasal mucus sample
TaqMan RT-PCR Assay
ELOSA (RT-PCR) Assay
Virus Culture
PCR+
PCR-
PCR-
PCR+
61% PCR+ 63% Culture+
PCR-
TaqMan RT-PCR Assay
• Qualitative– Reported to detect 90/101 rhinovirus, 3/53 enterovirus,
and 0/2 parechovirus serotypes– Sensitivity 93% (88-97%)– Assay run for 60 cycles – 0.1 fluorescence level considered positive
• Quantitative– Inadequate controls– Lack of reproducible sampling
• Quantification of viral nucleic acid not validated
Fluorescence versus Cycle
ELOSA RT-PCR Assay
• Used to re-test TaqMan negative samples• Reported to identify 101/101 rhinovirus,
53/53 enterovirus, and 1/2 parechovirus serotypes
• Sensitivity 97% for picornavirus
TaqMan and ELOSA Gel Analysis
Gel #4
M - +22 23 24 25 26 27 28 157
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
M - + 158
159
160
-- + MMM-
< <
Viral Culture
• Only PCR+ samples cultured– HeLa cells expressing ICAM at 33oC
• Reported positive or negative based on presence of cytopathic effects– No serotyping conductedNo serotyping conducted
Resistance in Pivotal Studies
• 23.7% overall – 13% baseline lack of susceptibility – 10.7% loss of susceptibility (treatment-emergent)
• No data on specific serotypes• 3/4 with baseline lack of susceptibility had
single amino acid change at VP1 position 98• Single amino acid substitutions led to
100-fold decrease in susceptibility
Time to Primary EndpointTreatment Emergent Resistance
Median
days
PBO (n=333) 8.6
Pleconaril (n=286) 6.5
Pleconaril (n=28) 4.9
Time to Primary EndpointBaseline Lack of Susceptibility
Not
Susceptible
Susceptible
PBO 4.8 days (n=45)
8.3 days (n=335)
Pleconaril 8.1 days (n=50)
6.4 days (n=314)
Food Effect
• Pleconaril exposure increased 4.0-6.5 fold Pleconaril exposure increased 4.0-6.5 fold with high fat/calorie mealwith high fat/calorie meal
• In hepatic impaired, AUC In hepatic impaired, AUC 40% (18-55%)40% (18-55%)– Partially due to lower fat and meal Partially due to lower fat and meal
• Patients instructed to take pleconaril within Patients instructed to take pleconaril within 15 minutes of full meal or snack15 minutes of full meal or snack– Adherence unknownAdherence unknown– Impact on efficacy unknownImpact on efficacy unknown
Safety
• General tolerabilityGeneral tolerability– HeadachesHeadaches– Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea
• CYP3A4 inductionCYP3A4 induction– Menstrual disordersMenstrual disorders– Potential for unintended pregnancies Potential for unintended pregnancies – Potential interactions with other medicationsPotential interactions with other medications
• Tachycardia/palpitationsTachycardia/palpitations
Pleconaril Adult Phase 2 7-day Treatment Studies
Study Regimens Endpoint Results (median days)
843-020 Pleconaril 400 mg BID (n=335) Pleconaril 400 mg TID (n=347) PBO (n=340)
Time (days) to resolution of all VRI symptoms sustained for 48 hours
ITT Pleconaril BID 8.0 Pleconaril TID 8.0 PBO 8.0 ITT-I Pleconaril BID 8.0 Pleconaril TID 9.0 PBO 8.0
843-032 Pleconaril 400 mg TID (n=436) PBO (n=439)
Time (days) to resolution of all VRI symptoms sustained for 24 hours
ITT Pleconaril 9.0 PBO 9.0 ITT-I Pleconaril 9.0 PBO 9.5
Phase 2 Limitations
• Difficulty identifying infected patients• Outcomes impacted by
– Uncontrolled and undocumented concomitant cold medication use
– Inclusion of smokers– Inclusion of patients with fever– Inclusion of patients with allergic rhinitis– Stringent endpoints– Initiation of treatment late in disease
Studies 843-043 and 843-044Design
• Double-blind, placebo controlled • Healthy adults >18 years of age• Moderate to severe rhinorrhea• VRI symptoms <24 hours • Answer “yes” to “Are your symptoms due
to a cold?”• Excluded allergic rhinitis, fever >100,
underlying pulmonary, cardiac, immunocompromised, or serious illnesses
Studies 843-043 and 843-044Design
• Randomization stratified by– Smoking status– Pre-use of cold medications
• 400mg pleconaril or PBO TID x 5 days• Clinic visits day 3, 6, and 18• Patient diaries for 18.5 days • Acetaminophen/dextromethorphan
provided
Studies 843-043 and 843-044Design
• Ordinal severity scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, cough, pharyngeal signs, mylagia and malaise
• Nasal mucus collected days 1, 3, and 6 for virologic testing– Experimental TaqMan PCR assay– Experimental ELOSA for TaqMan negative
samples– Only PCR+ samples cultured
Studies 843-043 and 843-044 Demographics (ITT)
PBO Pleconaril
(n=1,050) (n=1,046)
Gender
Male 31% 31%
Female 69% 69%
Age (mean years) 36 36
Range 18-86 17-82
Smokers 28% 29%
Pre-treatment cold med users 30% 30%
Median hours between first symptom 19.8 20.1
and first dose
Baseline severity score* 9 9
PCR positive at baseline 61% 62%
*Maximum score=18
Pleconaril Efficacy Results
Thomas Hammerstrom, PhD
Statistical Reviewer
Division of Antiviral Drug Products
Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
• Pivotal Phase 3 Trials 43 and 44– Endpoint: Time to no rhinorrhea, five other symptoms all
mild or absent, and no cold medication use for 48 hours
• Phase 2 Trials 10, 20 and 32– Endpoint: Time to no rhinorrhea, five other symptoms all
mild or absent for 48 hours
• Analysis populations: PCR+ and ITT– ELOSA assay for trials 20 and 32 – TaqMan plus ELOSA for trial 43 and 44
• Results based on the two slightly different endpoints were nearly identical in studies 43 and 44
PCR and Culture Status(Trial 43)
STATUS/ARM PBO Pleconaril
Enrolled 526 526
PCR positive at baseline
Positive culture 196 201
Negative culture 104 120
PCR negative at baseline,
positive day 3-6 24 13
Total PCR positive 324 334
Never PCR positive 202 192
PCR and Culture Status(Trial 44)
STATUS/ARM PBO Pleconaril
Enrolled 524 520
PCR positive at baseline
Positive culture 224 206
Negative culture 115 121
PCR negative at baseline,
positive day 3-6 11 16
Total PCR positive 350 343
Never PCR positive 174 177
Quartiles of Time to HealingPCR+ Patients (ITT-I)
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 p value
43 PBO 300 5.0 7.5 12.5
Pleconaril 321 4.0 7.0 11.0 0.023
44 PBO 339 5.0 8.5 12.5
Pleconaril 327 4.0 7.0 11.0 0.008
Quartiles of Time to HealingAll Randomized Patients (ITT)
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 p value
43 PBO 526 4.0 7.5 12.5
Pleconaril 526 4.0 7.0 11.5 0.13
44 PBO 524 4.5 8.0 13.0
Pleconaril 520 4.0 7.0 11.5 0.014
Quartiles of Time to HealingPCR+ Patients
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 p value
20 PBO 128 5.0 8.0 13.0
Pleconaril 147 5.0 9.0 13.0 0.70
32 PBO 205 8.5 12.5 >20
Pleconaril 173 8.5 12.0 17.5 0.51
Quartiles of Time to HealingAll Randomized
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 p value
20 PBO 334 5.0 8.0 15.0
Pleconaril 340 4.0 8.0 12.0 0.011
32 PBO 432 8.0 12.0 19.5
Pleconaril 427 8.0 12.0 19.5 0.82
Loss to Follow-UpPCR + Patients
Trial 43 44
Arm PBO Pleconaril PBO Pleconaril
Enrolled 300 321 339 327
Day 0 5 11 8 6
Days 1-5 11 8 5 4
Days 6-15 2 2 1 3
Days >16 46 46 57 46
Impact of Pre-Treatment Cold Medication Use (PCR+ Non-Users)
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3
43 PBO 215 4.5 7.5 11.5
Pleconaril 220 3.5 6.5 10.5
44 PBO 219 5.0 8.5 12.5
Pleconaril 214 3.5 6.5 10.5
Impact of Pre-Treatment Cold Medication Use (PCR+ Users)
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3
43 PBO 85 6.5 9.0 14.5
Pleconaril 101 4.0 7.5 13.5
44 PBO 120 5.0 8.5 13.0
Pleconaril 113 4.5 8.5 12.0
Impact of Smoking(PCR+ Non-Smokers)
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3
43 PBO 224 5.0 7.5 12.0
Pleconaril 219 3.5 6.5 10.5
44 PBO 249 5.0 8.5 12.5
Pleconaril 240 3.5 6.5 10.5
32 PBO 206 6.0 10.5 15.5
Pleconaril 173 5.5 8.0 13.5
Impact of Smoking(PCR+ Smokers)
Trial Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3
43 PBO 76 5.5 8.0 13.5
Pleconaril 102 5.5 9.0 14.0
44 PBO 90 5.0 8.5 12.5
Pleconaril 87 5.5 9.0 15.0
32 PBO 75 7.5 10.5 16.0
Pleconaril 67 7.5 11.0 19.5
Gender Analysis-PCR+Trials 43 and 44
Gender Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3
Female PBO 427 5.5 8.5 13.5
Pleconaril 439 4.0 7.0 11.5
Male PBO 212 4.0 7.0 11.0
Pleconaril 209 3.0 6.0 11.0
Smokers by Gender-PCR+Trials 43 and 044
Gender Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3
Female PBO 109 5.5 9.0 13.0
Pleconaril 122 6.0 9.0 14.5
Male PBO 57 3.5 6.5 12.0
Pleconaril 67 4.5 8.5 14.5
Time to Resolution of Individual Symptoms-Trial 43 (PCR+)
Symptom Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 P
Rhinorrhea PBO 300 4.0 7.0 11.0
Pleconaril 321 3.0 6.0 10.5 .040
Congestion PBO 284 4.0 6.5 10.0
Pleconaril 310 3.5 5.5 8.5 .021
Cough PBO 224 3.5 6.0 10.5
Pleconaril 251 3.0 6.0 11.0 .51
Malaise PBO 258 2.5 4.5 8.0
Pleconaril 280 2.5 4.0 6.5 .039
Time to Resolution of Individual Symptoms-Trial 43 (PCR+)
Symptom Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 P
Myalgia PBO 160 2.5 3.5 6.0
Pleconaril 164 1.5 2.5 4.5 .0001
Sore throat PBO 258 2.0 3.0 6.0
Pleconaril 274 1.5 2.5 4.5 .0001
Cold Med Use PBO 109 2.0 3.0 5.0
Pleconaril 102 2.0 3.0 4.5 .24
Time to Resolution of Individual Symptoms-Trial 44 (PCR+)
Symptom Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 P
Rhinorrhea PBO 338 4.5 7.5 12.0
Pleconaril 327 3.0 6.010.5 .0023
Congestion PBO 317 4.0 6.5 10.0
Pleconaril 313 3.5 6.0 10.0 .20
Cough PBO 232 3.5 7.0 12.5
Pleconaril 240 3.5 6.0 11.0 .37
Malaise PBO 292 3.0 4.0 6.5
Pleconaril 274 2.5 4.0 7.5 .51
Time to Resolution of Individual Symptoms-Trial 44 (PCR+)
Symptom Arm N Q1 Q2 Q3 P
Myalgia PBO 169 2.0 3.5 6.0
Pleconaril 157 2.0 3.0 6.0 .10
Sore throat PBO 292 1.5 3.0 5.0
Pleconaril 274 1.5 3.0 5.0 .77
Cold Med Use PBO 138 2.0 3.5 5.5
Pleconaril 109 2.0 3.0 5.0 .63
Secondary EndpointsPCR+ Patients
Trial Endpoint Pleconaril PBO Difference P
43 Days impaired 3.48 3.85 -.38 .19
44 Days impaired 3.52 3.70 -.17 .50
43 Nights impaired 2.73 3.45 -.72 .005
44 Nights impaired 2.96 3.28 -.31 .20
43 Complications .08 .06 .02 .38
44 Complications .06 .04 .01 .48
Efficacy Conclusions-1
• Pleconaril is statistically significantly superior to placebo in the PCR+ population
• If the assay has low false negative rate, then the PCR+ population includes most infected subjects and statistical significance confirms the pleconaril effect
Efficacy Conclusions-2
• Pleconaril showed no statistically significant benefit in the PCR+ populations of trials 20 and 32, with a slightly different endpoint and slightly different recruitment criteria
• Pleconaril will be used in the whole population, in which the estimated benefit is approximately 0.5 day
Efficacy Conclusions-3
• Pleconaril has no effect in smokers. This absence of benefit has been confirmed in three separate studies: 43, 44, and 32
Safety Review
• VRI safety database (n=4,468)– 2,488 treated with pleconaril– 1,986 treated with placebo
• No deaths or significant laboratory abnormalities
• Adverse events generally similar• DCs due to adverse events similar
– Headache, GI most common for both groups
General Adverse Events >2%in Pivotal Studies
PBO Pleconaril
(n=1,050) (n=1,046)
Headache 21% 23%
Diarrhea 7% 7%
Nausea 4% 6%
Vomiting 2% 2%
Abdominal pain 4% 2%
Sinusitis 2% 3%
Bronchitis 3% 3%
Increased cough 3% 3%
Dizziness 1% 2%
Rhinitis 3% 2%
Menstrual disorders <1% 2%
Menstrual Disorders
• Early menses/intermenstrual bleeding, Early menses/intermenstrual bleeding, menorrhagia, menstrual disorder NOSmenorrhagia, menstrual disorder NOS
• Observed in 5-7 day treatment studiesObserved in 5-7 day treatment studies• Significant increased frequency in 6-week Significant increased frequency in 6-week
prophylaxis studyprophylaxis study– Women re-consented– Barrier method recommended– Menstrual disorders targeted AEs
Menstrual Disorders
PBO Pleconaril
OC users 0/223(0%)
7/229(3.1%)
Non-OC users 1/792(0.1%)
1/787(0.1%)
PBO Pleconaril QD Pleconaril BID
OC users 22/81(27%)
57/98(58%)
47/58(81%)
Non-OC users 22/132(16%)
17/128(13%)
24/144(16%)
Treatment Studies
Prophylaxis Study
CYP3A4 Induction
• IV midazolam AUC 28% (24-33%)• Ethinyl estradiol AUC 35% (29-40%)• No significant change in norethindrone PK
• Single dose T1/2 180 hours
• Multiple dose T1/2 >1000 hours
• Maximum and duration of induction unknown• Potential to effect
– immunosuppressants, antiarrhythmics, calcium channel blockers, protease inhibitors, Viagra
Potential Risk of Unintended Pregnancies
• 20% OC users (n=690)• 13 pregnancies
– 8 pleconaril • 2 in 156 OC users (400 BID in 6-week study)
– 1 ongoing (EDC June 10, 2002)
– 1 abortion
– 5 placebo• 1 in OC user
– Outcome unknown
Potential Risk of Unintended Pregnancy
• CYP3A4 induction of ethinyl estradiol likely to impact at least entire cycle
• 10.4 million women between 15-44 used of a “pill” form of contraception*– Expected OC failure ~1/100 women/year of use
(range 0-2.5)– 2/156 in 6 weeks appears higher than expected
• Pleconaril not teratogenic, mutagenic, or genotoxic in animal studies
*AGI, 1998
Tachycardia/Palpitations
• Theophylline CYP1A2 probe study– 15 healthy theophylline-naïve volunteers– Theophylline 450 mg day 1, pleconaril 400 mg
TID days 4-10, 450 mg theophylline dose on day 8
– 3/15 tachycardia/palpitations during pleconaril/theophylline administration
abdominal pain, nausea, dizziness, syncope– Theophylline AUC 15% (4%-28%)
• No significant PK changes in 3 with palpitations
Tachycardia/Palpitations
• Adult VRI studies– 7 pleconaril with palpitations/tachycardia (0.3%)
• 3 reported onset within one hour of ingestion• 4 discontinued• 1 serious (ER visit)• No pleconaril re-challenge
– 2 placebo (0.1%)• 1 on day 5 within 1 hour• 1 on day 2 within 30 minutes
Summary of Application Issues
• Overall study results– Efficacy in phase 2 not demonstrated– Efficacy in phase 3
• 0.5 day benefit in all randomized• 1.0 day benefit in PCR+• Efficacy in smokers not demonstrated• No data in patients with co-morbid conditions
Summary of Application Issues
• Identification of infected patients possible Identification of infected patients possible • Quantitative performance not establishedQuantitative performance not established• No serotyping of positive culturesNo serotyping of positive cultures• ResistanceResistance
– Delayed resolution in patients with baseline lack Delayed resolution in patients with baseline lack of susceptibilityof susceptibility
– Shorter duration of illness in patients with loss of Shorter duration of illness in patients with loss of susceptibility susceptibility
– Single amino acid substitutions can lead to Single amino acid substitutions can lead to significant resistancesignificant resistance
Summary of Application Issues
• Analysis populations– Expected uses
• Prescribed to symptomatic with no diagnostic assay• Prescribed to asymptomatic for use at first symptom
• Food requirement– Administration with a full meal
• Requires initiation within 24 hours of symptom onset
Summary of Application Issues
• SafetySafety– CYP3A4 inductionCYP3A4 induction
• Menstrual disordersMenstrual disorders• Potential for OC failure and unintended pregnanciesPotential for OC failure and unintended pregnancies• Potential to impact efficacy of other medications Potential to impact efficacy of other medications
– Tachycardia/palpitationsTachycardia/palpitations– General tolerabilityGeneral tolerability
• HeadachesHeadaches• Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrheaNausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea
PleconarilReview Team
• Nara Battula• Anita Bigger• Jim Farrelly• Leslie Furlong• Zi Qiang Gu• Tom Hammerstrom• Katherine Laessig• Steve Miller• Julian O’Rear
• Kellie Reynolds• Destry Sillivan• Greg Soon• Kathleen Whitaker• Jenny Zheng