pid activities 1. summary of work/activities since last cm in berkeley 2. pid parallel session in...
TRANSCRIPT
PID activities
1. Summary of work/activities since last CM in Berkeley
2. PID parallel session in Frascati
3. Topics specific to each subdetector
CKOV1CKOV2
EmCal
4. Issues common to all PID systems
TOF
Gh. Grégoire
MICE collaboration meeting CM12, Frascati 28 June 2005
Phone meetings
Since the PID summary talk at Berkeley in 14-17 Feb. 2005, we held phone conferences about PID on
• March 1
• March 31
• April 13
• May 2
• May 11
• May 25
• June 15
Losses in the cooling channel
CKOV1
TOF
Losses in the end system vs beam emittance Implementation of CKOVs in G4MICETuning EmCal cuts CKOV2 photon collection
Task milestone tables
D&S updates + Milestone tables
Design&Safety issues
TRD update
D&S status
CKOV1 design ideasCKOV2 photon collection
EmCal response
CKOV2 electron efficiency
CKOV1 design issues
Emcal simulation 2
PID sessions in Frascati
Gh. Grégoire
CKOV1
TOF
MuCal theory
CKOV2
MuCal practice
PID in G4MICE
L. CremaldiM. Bonesini
GG
R. SandströmL. Tortora
S. Kahn
1. Parallel session on Sun 26 Jun
2. Plenary session on Mon 27 Jun
EmCal summary A. Tonazzo
TOF M. Bonesini
3
3. Parallel session on Mon 27 Jun pm (software)
Followup from CM 11
This is rather well advancedThanks to P. Drumm, the structure of the TRD chap. 8 has been divided into subsections to allow for easy modifications by the various groups.
1. PID updates of the TRD
2. Realistic drawings of the subdetectors
Converging process underway although time is passing by and audit/construction deadlines seriously approach
3. Tools for the final design
« Field maps, Geant4 particle files, full re-evaluation of the performances »
All are either available or well underway although there are sometimes difficulties to reach the PID requirements of MICE
4. Requirements for DAQ + Controls
Happy to see it progressing !
5
TOF
Conclusions presented by Maurizio Bonesini
design for TOF stations well understood
only some points to be defined connected with choice of size of TOF1/TOF2 PMTs (1.5” vs 2”) and divider for TOF0 PMTs (booster vs active divider)
define electronics chain (TDC for high incoming rate): probable choice CAEN V1290
define the high-demanding calibration system (mainly laser based)
test a prototype asap at LNF BTF, together with EMCAL
Including detailed cost estimates
6
Questions/comments raised about TOFs
• Possibility to reduce the vertical size of TOF0 ?
Reducing its thickness
While keeping a good light collection
It needs beforehand a full understanding of the beam spot at the position of TOF0
• What about the rate capabilities of the PMTs and the proposed electronics with random hits instead of uniformly time-spaced laser pulses?
P. Soler: proposal to perform « real world » tests in the synchrotron vault at RAL
(Associated Dead time ?)
• Why using a complicated laser system for calibration ?
7
Questions/comments about CKOV1
But the responses for pions and muons overlap at the high-momentum end for all « reasonable » radiators
• for not commercially available materials (like aerogel with n=1.12)except
• cryogenic liquids (Liq. H2 with n=1.123) bringing their own (big) set of problems
Aerogel n=1.12
Smaller indices
Smaller light yield
Light collection
in addition to the challenging engineering, safety and operation issues …
10
CKOV2
Aerogel box
Front mirror
Particle entrance window
Particle exit window
Back mirror
Optical windows, Winston cones, PM’s
+ various small elements (clamping pieces for windows)
Talk presented by GG
13
CKOV2 performance
Electronic Threshold
(p.e.)n = 1.02 n = 1.04
0 0.002 0.002
1 0.011 0.003
2 0.214 0.025
3 0.513 0.146
Everything is summarized in the electron detection inefficiency table
14
Questions/comments about CKOV2
• Study of electron detection efficiency based on Tom’s particle files
• Mechanical/optical design understood and optimized (hopefully)
• Simulation: nowhere, not yet started
On behalf of Captain Vittorio
1. Choice of a good internal geometry
2. Proposal to use n=1.04 aerogel
15
EmCal
Talks presented by A. Tonazzo, L. Tortora
Detailed descriptions from concept, to design, construction and simulation
Including detailed cost estimates16
EmCal simulation and performances
Talk presented by R. Sandström
10 mm rad emittance
Muon momentum centered around 200 MeV/c ( 30 MeV/c)
NN training
Performance for subsystemsAssumption target =
efficiency > 99.9 %
purity > 99.8 %
Achieved!
17
Questions/comments about EmCal
• The simulation should be extended up to muon momenta as high as 300 MeV/c.
• The beam particles should come from a full simulation of the MICE beam line.
• Influence of the fibre free zone at the edges of adjacent modules/sectors
• Does the inclusion of CKOV2 input improve the PID performances at higher momenta ?
18
Issues common to all PID systems
1. Full documentation and update of the TRD
Certainly easier today for TOF, CKOV2 and EmCal
2. Internal audit regarding designs and safety
It is an integral and unavoidable duty for the acceptance of our designs
Milestone tables, GANTT charts, supports, DAQ building elements, ancillaries (cables, access, supports) …
3. ...before going before the (external) RAL audit committee and getting hopefully a green light for construction
Many most helpful persons are at hand and willing to help you !
19