piney point water management plan fy04/05
TRANSCRIPT
Major Transfer Categories
0
100200
300
400500
600
700800
900
10001100
1200
13001400
1500
LimeTreated
DomesticWWTP
IndustrialReuse
RO Barge Total
Mill
ion
Gal
lon
s 2004
2003
2002
2001
15-Day Average Ammonia Loading 2003-2004
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1/24
/03
3/24
/03
5/24
/03
7/24
/03
9/24
/03
11/2
4/03
1/24
/04
3/24
/04
5/24
/04
7/24
/04
NH3 loading, lbs/day Target loading lbs/day
15-Day Average Ammonia Loading - 2004
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1/1/
04
1/15
/04
1/29
/04
2/12
/04
2/26
/04
3/11
/04
3/25
/04
4/8/
04
4/22
/04
5/6/
04
5/20
/04
6/3/
04
6/17
/04
7/1/
04
7/15
/04
7/29
/04
NH3 loading, lbs/day Target loading lbs/day
Daily Ammonia Concentration 12/03 - 8/04
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
4012
/1/0
3
1/1/
04
2/1/
04
3/1/
04
4/1/
04
5/1/
04
6/1/
04
7/1/
04
8/1/
04
NH
3, m
g/l
NH3, mg/l
Surface Water Discharge
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
Gallo
ns pe
r Wee
k
R. Osmosis
Double Lime
TotalDischarge
The Updated Near-Term and Long-TermConsumption Rates are as Follow:
• August 2004:• October 2006:• December 2006:
1.0 MGD
0.5 MGD
0.3 MGD
May be decreased even further depending on conditions
FY 04/05Water Management Plan:
• Reverse Osmosis
• New Spray Evaporation System
• Slurry Wall
• Double Lime and Aeration System
AMMONIAREMOVAL
PONDS
PLANNED SPRAYEVAPORATION SYSTEM
LIME SLUDGEDISPOSAL CELL
SECOND STAGELIME TREATMENT
FIRST STAGELIME TREATMENT
OVERVIEW OF WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
U.S. FILTERREVERSE OSMOSIS
SYSTEM
Ph Adjustment
CURRENTPROCESS WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Alternative Jul-Sept. 2003 Oct-Dec 2003 Jan-Mar 2004 Apr-June 2004 FY 2005
(gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (MM Gals)
Total Required 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 365
Evaporation -0- 0-200,000 50,000-200,000 50,000-200,000 54
Reverse Osmosis 400,000- 400,000- 400,000- 0-400,000 146
700,000 700,000 700,000
600,000 600,000 550,000 950,000 Lime Precip. 300,000- 100,000- 100,000- 400,000- 165
Discharge Quality
Scenario TN lbs/day
A. Average Full year 32
B. 10-04 thru 6-05 (withevap)
19-27
C. RO early termination 50
D. Worst Case 100
Piney Point ITN
• Preference for proposals that use proven and tried methods, and higher ranking given to plans that minimize ammonia nitrogen loadings to surface waters.
• Respondents can utilize DEP water management plan or develop their own.