plant physiology preview. published on august 12, …...2015/08/12 · type ii system is the most...
TRANSCRIPT
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
1
1
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize 2
3
4
5
Corresponding Author A Mark Cigan DuPont Pioneer 7300 NW 62nd Ave Johnston 6
IA 50131 USA 7
Telephone 1-(515)-535-3904 8
E-mail MarkCiganPioneercom 9
10
11
Research Area Breakthrough Technologies 12
13
Plant Physiology Preview Published on August 12 2015 as DOI101104pp1500793
Copyright 2015 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
2
Targeted Mutagenesis Precise Gene Editing and Site-Specific Gene 14
Insertion in Maize Using Cas9 and Guide RNA 15
16
Sergei Svitashev1 Joshua K Young1 Christine Schwartz Huirong Gao S Carl Falco 17
and A Mark Cigan 18
19
Trait Enabling Technologies 20
DuPont Pioneer 7300 NW 62nd Avenue Johnston Iowa 50131 USA 21
22
23
24
25
Summary 26
27
Advances in double-strand break technologies modernize genome editing in maize28
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
3
Footnotes 29
1 These authors contributed equally to the article 30
Address correspondence to MarkCiganPioneercom 31
32
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in 33
this article in accordance with the Journal policy described in the Instructions for 34
Authors (httpwwwplantphysiolorg) is Mark Cigan (MarkCiganPioneercom) 35
36
AMC and SCF conceived the project SS JKY HG and AMC designed the 37
experiments SS JKY and CS performed the experiments SS JKY CS and 38
AMC analyzed the data SS and AMC wrote the article 39
40
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
4
41
ABSTRACT 42
Targeted mutagenesis editing of endogenous maize genes and site-specific insertion 43
of a trait gene using Cas9-guide RNA technology is reported in Zea mays DNA vectors 44
expressing maize codon-optimized Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease and 45
single guide RNAs were co-introduced with or without DNA repair templates into maize 46
immature embryos by biolistic transformation targeting five different genomic regions 47
upstream of the liguleless-1 gene (LIG) male fertility genes (MS26 and MS45) and 48
acetolactate synthase genes (ALS1 and ALS2) Mutations were subsequently identified 49
at all sites targeted and plants containing biallelic multiplex mutations at LIG MS26 and 50
MS45 were recovered Biolistic delivery of guide RNAs (as RNA molecules) directly into 51
immature embryo cells containing pre-integrated Cas9 also resulted in targeted 52
mutations Editing the ALS2 gene using either single-stranded oligonucleotides or 53
double-stranded DNA vectors as repair templates yielded chlorsulfuron resistant plants 54
Double-strand breaks generated by RNA guided Cas9 endonuclease also stimulated 55
insertion of a trait gene at a site near liguleless-1 by homology-directed repair Progeny 56
demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of mutations edits and targeted gene 57
insertions The examples reported in this study demonstrate the utility of Cas9-guide 58
RNA technology as a plant genome editing tool to enhance plant breeding and crop 59
research needed to meet growing agriculture demands of the future 60
61
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
5
INTRODUCTION 62
The evolution of plant breeding one of the first scientific activities known in the 63
history of human kind has allowed rapid progress of our civilization and continues to be 64
important for the improvement of crops and sustainability of agriculture Traditional 65
breeding however is limited by the starting genetic diversity With the advent of 66
modern molecular biology breederrsquos options have been substantially broadened 67
allowing the purposeful transfer of genetic information from either related or diverse 68
organisms into different plant species thus specifically improving agricultural 69
performance The most common methods of DNA delivery particle bombardment and 70
Agrobacterium infection lead to random gene insertions throughout the genome 71
Integration of trait genes into a specific location is considerably more attractive and can 72
be accomplished through homology-directed repair (HDR) While a few publications 73
before 2009 have reported successful direct application of HDR to modify endogenous 74
plant genes this occurs at impractically low frequencies (Halfter et al 1992 Offringa et 75
al 1993 Miao and Lam 1995 Kempin et al 1997 Hanin et al 2001 Terada et al 76
2002 Terada et al 2007) Studies in different organisms including plants have 77
demonstrated that coincident generation of targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) 78
is central to improving the frequency (up to 1000-fold or more) of gene editing and site-79
specific gene insertion via HDR (Puchta et al 1993 Choulika et al 1995 Smih et al 80
1995 Puchta et al 1996) DSBs in eukaryotic cells can be repaired using two different 81
pathways ndash non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and HDR (Roth and Wilson 1986 82
Moore and Haber 1996 Puchta et al 1996 Jasin and Rothstein 2013) The NHEJ 83
pathway is most common in somatic cells and is prone to imperfect repair which results 84
in mutations such as deletions insertions inversions or translocations HDR although 85
less frequent can be directed by the addition of DNA molecules homologous to the 86
DSB region By using repair DNA templates that contain sequence variation or promote 87
the insertion of expression cassettes gene editing and site-specific gene integration can 88
be achieved 89
During the past decade different nucleases capable of generating targeted DSBs 90
were developed and have become important tools to improve gene editing and site-91
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
6
specific integration in different species including plants (Puchta and Fauser 2014 92
Voytas and Gao 2014 Kumar and Jain 2015) While Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) 93
customized homing endonucleases (meganucleases) and transcription activator-like 94
effector nucleases (TALENs) advanced genome editing the recently discovered Cas-95
guide RNA system has revolutionized the field (Doudna and Charpentier 2014 Hsu et 96
al 2014) This technology emerged from a bacterial adaptive defense system which 97
includes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and 98
CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease which protects the host from plasmid and viral 99
infection (Barrangou et al 2007) Three CRISPR-Cas systems (Type I II and III) with 100
different mechanisms have been described in bacteria and archea (Makarova et al 101
2011 Makarova et al 2011) Type II system is the most simple and requires a single 102
RNA-guided Cas9 protein for recognition and cleavage of invading DNA (Gasiunas et 103
al 2012 Jinek et al 2012) To generate site-specific DSB the system minimally 104
requires Cas9 protein and a duplex of CRISPR RNA (crRNA) a trans-encoded CRISPR 105
RNA (tracrRNA) and the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) which flanks 106
the 3rsquo end of the crRNA-targeted sequence (Gasiunas et al 2012 Cong et al 2013) It 107
has been demonstrated that fusion of the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single guide RNA 108
(gRNA) molecule not only simplified the system consisting now of two instead of three-109
components but also significantly improved the frequency of genomic DNA cleavage 110
(Jinek et al 2012 Mali et al 2013) Thus in contrast to ZFNs meganucleases and 111
TALENs which require sophisticated protein engineering to establish specific target site 112
recognition (Smith et al 2000 Arnould et al 2006 Smith et al 2006 Maeder et al 113
2008 Boch et al 2009 Weber et al 2011) Cas9-gRNA reagents are simple to design 114
Targeting of genomic sequences by Cas9-gRNA relies on binding of PAM nucleotides 115
(NGG for S pyogenes) by Cas9 and base-pairing of the gRNA to the adjacent target 116
site sequence 117
The Cas9-gRNA system has been shown to function in many different 118
organisms including plants To date it has been used to generate targeted gene 119
modifications in multiple plant species Arabidopsis thaliana Citrus sinensis Nicotiana 120
benthamiana Nicotiana tabaccum Oryza sativa Solanum lycopersicum Sorghum 121
bicolor Triticum aestivum (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) Zea mays (Liang et 122
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
7
al 2014) and Glycine max (Jacobs et al 2015) The majority of these studies 123
however report genome modifications in plants via NHEJ to generate mutations and 124
gene knock-outs While knock-outs are very valuable and allow gene function analysis 125
their application is limited HDR brings other opportunities in genome editing but has 126
been more challenging As a result reports describing successful gene editing or site-127
specific trait gene integration through HDR in plants are limited (Cai et al 2009 Shukla 128
et al 2009 Townsend et al 2009 Ainley et al 2013 DHalluin et al 2013 Li et al 129
2013 Shan et al 2013 Zhang et al 2013) 130
The data presented in this report demonstrate that the Cas9-gRNA system can 131
efficiently facilitate simultaneous multiple gene knockouts native gene editing and site-132
specific gene integration in maize Analysis of T1 plants established that the gene 133
knockouts edits and insertions were heritable and exhibited expected Mendelian 134
segregation This is the first report of Cas9-gRNA technology application in maize 135
demonstrating gene mutagenesis upon direct delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA 136
molecules native gene editing and site-specific gene integration 137
138
139
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
2
Targeted Mutagenesis Precise Gene Editing and Site-Specific Gene 14
Insertion in Maize Using Cas9 and Guide RNA 15
16
Sergei Svitashev1 Joshua K Young1 Christine Schwartz Huirong Gao S Carl Falco 17
and A Mark Cigan 18
19
Trait Enabling Technologies 20
DuPont Pioneer 7300 NW 62nd Avenue Johnston Iowa 50131 USA 21
22
23
24
25
Summary 26
27
Advances in double-strand break technologies modernize genome editing in maize28
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
3
Footnotes 29
1 These authors contributed equally to the article 30
Address correspondence to MarkCiganPioneercom 31
32
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in 33
this article in accordance with the Journal policy described in the Instructions for 34
Authors (httpwwwplantphysiolorg) is Mark Cigan (MarkCiganPioneercom) 35
36
AMC and SCF conceived the project SS JKY HG and AMC designed the 37
experiments SS JKY and CS performed the experiments SS JKY CS and 38
AMC analyzed the data SS and AMC wrote the article 39
40
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
4
41
ABSTRACT 42
Targeted mutagenesis editing of endogenous maize genes and site-specific insertion 43
of a trait gene using Cas9-guide RNA technology is reported in Zea mays DNA vectors 44
expressing maize codon-optimized Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease and 45
single guide RNAs were co-introduced with or without DNA repair templates into maize 46
immature embryos by biolistic transformation targeting five different genomic regions 47
upstream of the liguleless-1 gene (LIG) male fertility genes (MS26 and MS45) and 48
acetolactate synthase genes (ALS1 and ALS2) Mutations were subsequently identified 49
at all sites targeted and plants containing biallelic multiplex mutations at LIG MS26 and 50
MS45 were recovered Biolistic delivery of guide RNAs (as RNA molecules) directly into 51
immature embryo cells containing pre-integrated Cas9 also resulted in targeted 52
mutations Editing the ALS2 gene using either single-stranded oligonucleotides or 53
double-stranded DNA vectors as repair templates yielded chlorsulfuron resistant plants 54
Double-strand breaks generated by RNA guided Cas9 endonuclease also stimulated 55
insertion of a trait gene at a site near liguleless-1 by homology-directed repair Progeny 56
demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of mutations edits and targeted gene 57
insertions The examples reported in this study demonstrate the utility of Cas9-guide 58
RNA technology as a plant genome editing tool to enhance plant breeding and crop 59
research needed to meet growing agriculture demands of the future 60
61
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
5
INTRODUCTION 62
The evolution of plant breeding one of the first scientific activities known in the 63
history of human kind has allowed rapid progress of our civilization and continues to be 64
important for the improvement of crops and sustainability of agriculture Traditional 65
breeding however is limited by the starting genetic diversity With the advent of 66
modern molecular biology breederrsquos options have been substantially broadened 67
allowing the purposeful transfer of genetic information from either related or diverse 68
organisms into different plant species thus specifically improving agricultural 69
performance The most common methods of DNA delivery particle bombardment and 70
Agrobacterium infection lead to random gene insertions throughout the genome 71
Integration of trait genes into a specific location is considerably more attractive and can 72
be accomplished through homology-directed repair (HDR) While a few publications 73
before 2009 have reported successful direct application of HDR to modify endogenous 74
plant genes this occurs at impractically low frequencies (Halfter et al 1992 Offringa et 75
al 1993 Miao and Lam 1995 Kempin et al 1997 Hanin et al 2001 Terada et al 76
2002 Terada et al 2007) Studies in different organisms including plants have 77
demonstrated that coincident generation of targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) 78
is central to improving the frequency (up to 1000-fold or more) of gene editing and site-79
specific gene insertion via HDR (Puchta et al 1993 Choulika et al 1995 Smih et al 80
1995 Puchta et al 1996) DSBs in eukaryotic cells can be repaired using two different 81
pathways ndash non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and HDR (Roth and Wilson 1986 82
Moore and Haber 1996 Puchta et al 1996 Jasin and Rothstein 2013) The NHEJ 83
pathway is most common in somatic cells and is prone to imperfect repair which results 84
in mutations such as deletions insertions inversions or translocations HDR although 85
less frequent can be directed by the addition of DNA molecules homologous to the 86
DSB region By using repair DNA templates that contain sequence variation or promote 87
the insertion of expression cassettes gene editing and site-specific gene integration can 88
be achieved 89
During the past decade different nucleases capable of generating targeted DSBs 90
were developed and have become important tools to improve gene editing and site-91
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
6
specific integration in different species including plants (Puchta and Fauser 2014 92
Voytas and Gao 2014 Kumar and Jain 2015) While Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) 93
customized homing endonucleases (meganucleases) and transcription activator-like 94
effector nucleases (TALENs) advanced genome editing the recently discovered Cas-95
guide RNA system has revolutionized the field (Doudna and Charpentier 2014 Hsu et 96
al 2014) This technology emerged from a bacterial adaptive defense system which 97
includes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and 98
CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease which protects the host from plasmid and viral 99
infection (Barrangou et al 2007) Three CRISPR-Cas systems (Type I II and III) with 100
different mechanisms have been described in bacteria and archea (Makarova et al 101
2011 Makarova et al 2011) Type II system is the most simple and requires a single 102
RNA-guided Cas9 protein for recognition and cleavage of invading DNA (Gasiunas et 103
al 2012 Jinek et al 2012) To generate site-specific DSB the system minimally 104
requires Cas9 protein and a duplex of CRISPR RNA (crRNA) a trans-encoded CRISPR 105
RNA (tracrRNA) and the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) which flanks 106
the 3rsquo end of the crRNA-targeted sequence (Gasiunas et al 2012 Cong et al 2013) It 107
has been demonstrated that fusion of the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single guide RNA 108
(gRNA) molecule not only simplified the system consisting now of two instead of three-109
components but also significantly improved the frequency of genomic DNA cleavage 110
(Jinek et al 2012 Mali et al 2013) Thus in contrast to ZFNs meganucleases and 111
TALENs which require sophisticated protein engineering to establish specific target site 112
recognition (Smith et al 2000 Arnould et al 2006 Smith et al 2006 Maeder et al 113
2008 Boch et al 2009 Weber et al 2011) Cas9-gRNA reagents are simple to design 114
Targeting of genomic sequences by Cas9-gRNA relies on binding of PAM nucleotides 115
(NGG for S pyogenes) by Cas9 and base-pairing of the gRNA to the adjacent target 116
site sequence 117
The Cas9-gRNA system has been shown to function in many different 118
organisms including plants To date it has been used to generate targeted gene 119
modifications in multiple plant species Arabidopsis thaliana Citrus sinensis Nicotiana 120
benthamiana Nicotiana tabaccum Oryza sativa Solanum lycopersicum Sorghum 121
bicolor Triticum aestivum (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) Zea mays (Liang et 122
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
7
al 2014) and Glycine max (Jacobs et al 2015) The majority of these studies 123
however report genome modifications in plants via NHEJ to generate mutations and 124
gene knock-outs While knock-outs are very valuable and allow gene function analysis 125
their application is limited HDR brings other opportunities in genome editing but has 126
been more challenging As a result reports describing successful gene editing or site-127
specific trait gene integration through HDR in plants are limited (Cai et al 2009 Shukla 128
et al 2009 Townsend et al 2009 Ainley et al 2013 DHalluin et al 2013 Li et al 129
2013 Shan et al 2013 Zhang et al 2013) 130
The data presented in this report demonstrate that the Cas9-gRNA system can 131
efficiently facilitate simultaneous multiple gene knockouts native gene editing and site-132
specific gene integration in maize Analysis of T1 plants established that the gene 133
knockouts edits and insertions were heritable and exhibited expected Mendelian 134
segregation This is the first report of Cas9-gRNA technology application in maize 135
demonstrating gene mutagenesis upon direct delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA 136
molecules native gene editing and site-specific gene integration 137
138
139
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
3
Footnotes 29
1 These authors contributed equally to the article 30
Address correspondence to MarkCiganPioneercom 31
32
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in 33
this article in accordance with the Journal policy described in the Instructions for 34
Authors (httpwwwplantphysiolorg) is Mark Cigan (MarkCiganPioneercom) 35
36
AMC and SCF conceived the project SS JKY HG and AMC designed the 37
experiments SS JKY and CS performed the experiments SS JKY CS and 38
AMC analyzed the data SS and AMC wrote the article 39
40
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
4
41
ABSTRACT 42
Targeted mutagenesis editing of endogenous maize genes and site-specific insertion 43
of a trait gene using Cas9-guide RNA technology is reported in Zea mays DNA vectors 44
expressing maize codon-optimized Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease and 45
single guide RNAs were co-introduced with or without DNA repair templates into maize 46
immature embryos by biolistic transformation targeting five different genomic regions 47
upstream of the liguleless-1 gene (LIG) male fertility genes (MS26 and MS45) and 48
acetolactate synthase genes (ALS1 and ALS2) Mutations were subsequently identified 49
at all sites targeted and plants containing biallelic multiplex mutations at LIG MS26 and 50
MS45 were recovered Biolistic delivery of guide RNAs (as RNA molecules) directly into 51
immature embryo cells containing pre-integrated Cas9 also resulted in targeted 52
mutations Editing the ALS2 gene using either single-stranded oligonucleotides or 53
double-stranded DNA vectors as repair templates yielded chlorsulfuron resistant plants 54
Double-strand breaks generated by RNA guided Cas9 endonuclease also stimulated 55
insertion of a trait gene at a site near liguleless-1 by homology-directed repair Progeny 56
demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of mutations edits and targeted gene 57
insertions The examples reported in this study demonstrate the utility of Cas9-guide 58
RNA technology as a plant genome editing tool to enhance plant breeding and crop 59
research needed to meet growing agriculture demands of the future 60
61
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
5
INTRODUCTION 62
The evolution of plant breeding one of the first scientific activities known in the 63
history of human kind has allowed rapid progress of our civilization and continues to be 64
important for the improvement of crops and sustainability of agriculture Traditional 65
breeding however is limited by the starting genetic diversity With the advent of 66
modern molecular biology breederrsquos options have been substantially broadened 67
allowing the purposeful transfer of genetic information from either related or diverse 68
organisms into different plant species thus specifically improving agricultural 69
performance The most common methods of DNA delivery particle bombardment and 70
Agrobacterium infection lead to random gene insertions throughout the genome 71
Integration of trait genes into a specific location is considerably more attractive and can 72
be accomplished through homology-directed repair (HDR) While a few publications 73
before 2009 have reported successful direct application of HDR to modify endogenous 74
plant genes this occurs at impractically low frequencies (Halfter et al 1992 Offringa et 75
al 1993 Miao and Lam 1995 Kempin et al 1997 Hanin et al 2001 Terada et al 76
2002 Terada et al 2007) Studies in different organisms including plants have 77
demonstrated that coincident generation of targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) 78
is central to improving the frequency (up to 1000-fold or more) of gene editing and site-79
specific gene insertion via HDR (Puchta et al 1993 Choulika et al 1995 Smih et al 80
1995 Puchta et al 1996) DSBs in eukaryotic cells can be repaired using two different 81
pathways ndash non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and HDR (Roth and Wilson 1986 82
Moore and Haber 1996 Puchta et al 1996 Jasin and Rothstein 2013) The NHEJ 83
pathway is most common in somatic cells and is prone to imperfect repair which results 84
in mutations such as deletions insertions inversions or translocations HDR although 85
less frequent can be directed by the addition of DNA molecules homologous to the 86
DSB region By using repair DNA templates that contain sequence variation or promote 87
the insertion of expression cassettes gene editing and site-specific gene integration can 88
be achieved 89
During the past decade different nucleases capable of generating targeted DSBs 90
were developed and have become important tools to improve gene editing and site-91
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
6
specific integration in different species including plants (Puchta and Fauser 2014 92
Voytas and Gao 2014 Kumar and Jain 2015) While Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) 93
customized homing endonucleases (meganucleases) and transcription activator-like 94
effector nucleases (TALENs) advanced genome editing the recently discovered Cas-95
guide RNA system has revolutionized the field (Doudna and Charpentier 2014 Hsu et 96
al 2014) This technology emerged from a bacterial adaptive defense system which 97
includes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and 98
CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease which protects the host from plasmid and viral 99
infection (Barrangou et al 2007) Three CRISPR-Cas systems (Type I II and III) with 100
different mechanisms have been described in bacteria and archea (Makarova et al 101
2011 Makarova et al 2011) Type II system is the most simple and requires a single 102
RNA-guided Cas9 protein for recognition and cleavage of invading DNA (Gasiunas et 103
al 2012 Jinek et al 2012) To generate site-specific DSB the system minimally 104
requires Cas9 protein and a duplex of CRISPR RNA (crRNA) a trans-encoded CRISPR 105
RNA (tracrRNA) and the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) which flanks 106
the 3rsquo end of the crRNA-targeted sequence (Gasiunas et al 2012 Cong et al 2013) It 107
has been demonstrated that fusion of the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single guide RNA 108
(gRNA) molecule not only simplified the system consisting now of two instead of three-109
components but also significantly improved the frequency of genomic DNA cleavage 110
(Jinek et al 2012 Mali et al 2013) Thus in contrast to ZFNs meganucleases and 111
TALENs which require sophisticated protein engineering to establish specific target site 112
recognition (Smith et al 2000 Arnould et al 2006 Smith et al 2006 Maeder et al 113
2008 Boch et al 2009 Weber et al 2011) Cas9-gRNA reagents are simple to design 114
Targeting of genomic sequences by Cas9-gRNA relies on binding of PAM nucleotides 115
(NGG for S pyogenes) by Cas9 and base-pairing of the gRNA to the adjacent target 116
site sequence 117
The Cas9-gRNA system has been shown to function in many different 118
organisms including plants To date it has been used to generate targeted gene 119
modifications in multiple plant species Arabidopsis thaliana Citrus sinensis Nicotiana 120
benthamiana Nicotiana tabaccum Oryza sativa Solanum lycopersicum Sorghum 121
bicolor Triticum aestivum (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) Zea mays (Liang et 122
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
7
al 2014) and Glycine max (Jacobs et al 2015) The majority of these studies 123
however report genome modifications in plants via NHEJ to generate mutations and 124
gene knock-outs While knock-outs are very valuable and allow gene function analysis 125
their application is limited HDR brings other opportunities in genome editing but has 126
been more challenging As a result reports describing successful gene editing or site-127
specific trait gene integration through HDR in plants are limited (Cai et al 2009 Shukla 128
et al 2009 Townsend et al 2009 Ainley et al 2013 DHalluin et al 2013 Li et al 129
2013 Shan et al 2013 Zhang et al 2013) 130
The data presented in this report demonstrate that the Cas9-gRNA system can 131
efficiently facilitate simultaneous multiple gene knockouts native gene editing and site-132
specific gene integration in maize Analysis of T1 plants established that the gene 133
knockouts edits and insertions were heritable and exhibited expected Mendelian 134
segregation This is the first report of Cas9-gRNA technology application in maize 135
demonstrating gene mutagenesis upon direct delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA 136
molecules native gene editing and site-specific gene integration 137
138
139
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
4
41
ABSTRACT 42
Targeted mutagenesis editing of endogenous maize genes and site-specific insertion 43
of a trait gene using Cas9-guide RNA technology is reported in Zea mays DNA vectors 44
expressing maize codon-optimized Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease and 45
single guide RNAs were co-introduced with or without DNA repair templates into maize 46
immature embryos by biolistic transformation targeting five different genomic regions 47
upstream of the liguleless-1 gene (LIG) male fertility genes (MS26 and MS45) and 48
acetolactate synthase genes (ALS1 and ALS2) Mutations were subsequently identified 49
at all sites targeted and plants containing biallelic multiplex mutations at LIG MS26 and 50
MS45 were recovered Biolistic delivery of guide RNAs (as RNA molecules) directly into 51
immature embryo cells containing pre-integrated Cas9 also resulted in targeted 52
mutations Editing the ALS2 gene using either single-stranded oligonucleotides or 53
double-stranded DNA vectors as repair templates yielded chlorsulfuron resistant plants 54
Double-strand breaks generated by RNA guided Cas9 endonuclease also stimulated 55
insertion of a trait gene at a site near liguleless-1 by homology-directed repair Progeny 56
demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of mutations edits and targeted gene 57
insertions The examples reported in this study demonstrate the utility of Cas9-guide 58
RNA technology as a plant genome editing tool to enhance plant breeding and crop 59
research needed to meet growing agriculture demands of the future 60
61
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
5
INTRODUCTION 62
The evolution of plant breeding one of the first scientific activities known in the 63
history of human kind has allowed rapid progress of our civilization and continues to be 64
important for the improvement of crops and sustainability of agriculture Traditional 65
breeding however is limited by the starting genetic diversity With the advent of 66
modern molecular biology breederrsquos options have been substantially broadened 67
allowing the purposeful transfer of genetic information from either related or diverse 68
organisms into different plant species thus specifically improving agricultural 69
performance The most common methods of DNA delivery particle bombardment and 70
Agrobacterium infection lead to random gene insertions throughout the genome 71
Integration of trait genes into a specific location is considerably more attractive and can 72
be accomplished through homology-directed repair (HDR) While a few publications 73
before 2009 have reported successful direct application of HDR to modify endogenous 74
plant genes this occurs at impractically low frequencies (Halfter et al 1992 Offringa et 75
al 1993 Miao and Lam 1995 Kempin et al 1997 Hanin et al 2001 Terada et al 76
2002 Terada et al 2007) Studies in different organisms including plants have 77
demonstrated that coincident generation of targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) 78
is central to improving the frequency (up to 1000-fold or more) of gene editing and site-79
specific gene insertion via HDR (Puchta et al 1993 Choulika et al 1995 Smih et al 80
1995 Puchta et al 1996) DSBs in eukaryotic cells can be repaired using two different 81
pathways ndash non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and HDR (Roth and Wilson 1986 82
Moore and Haber 1996 Puchta et al 1996 Jasin and Rothstein 2013) The NHEJ 83
pathway is most common in somatic cells and is prone to imperfect repair which results 84
in mutations such as deletions insertions inversions or translocations HDR although 85
less frequent can be directed by the addition of DNA molecules homologous to the 86
DSB region By using repair DNA templates that contain sequence variation or promote 87
the insertion of expression cassettes gene editing and site-specific gene integration can 88
be achieved 89
During the past decade different nucleases capable of generating targeted DSBs 90
were developed and have become important tools to improve gene editing and site-91
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
6
specific integration in different species including plants (Puchta and Fauser 2014 92
Voytas and Gao 2014 Kumar and Jain 2015) While Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) 93
customized homing endonucleases (meganucleases) and transcription activator-like 94
effector nucleases (TALENs) advanced genome editing the recently discovered Cas-95
guide RNA system has revolutionized the field (Doudna and Charpentier 2014 Hsu et 96
al 2014) This technology emerged from a bacterial adaptive defense system which 97
includes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and 98
CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease which protects the host from plasmid and viral 99
infection (Barrangou et al 2007) Three CRISPR-Cas systems (Type I II and III) with 100
different mechanisms have been described in bacteria and archea (Makarova et al 101
2011 Makarova et al 2011) Type II system is the most simple and requires a single 102
RNA-guided Cas9 protein for recognition and cleavage of invading DNA (Gasiunas et 103
al 2012 Jinek et al 2012) To generate site-specific DSB the system minimally 104
requires Cas9 protein and a duplex of CRISPR RNA (crRNA) a trans-encoded CRISPR 105
RNA (tracrRNA) and the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) which flanks 106
the 3rsquo end of the crRNA-targeted sequence (Gasiunas et al 2012 Cong et al 2013) It 107
has been demonstrated that fusion of the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single guide RNA 108
(gRNA) molecule not only simplified the system consisting now of two instead of three-109
components but also significantly improved the frequency of genomic DNA cleavage 110
(Jinek et al 2012 Mali et al 2013) Thus in contrast to ZFNs meganucleases and 111
TALENs which require sophisticated protein engineering to establish specific target site 112
recognition (Smith et al 2000 Arnould et al 2006 Smith et al 2006 Maeder et al 113
2008 Boch et al 2009 Weber et al 2011) Cas9-gRNA reagents are simple to design 114
Targeting of genomic sequences by Cas9-gRNA relies on binding of PAM nucleotides 115
(NGG for S pyogenes) by Cas9 and base-pairing of the gRNA to the adjacent target 116
site sequence 117
The Cas9-gRNA system has been shown to function in many different 118
organisms including plants To date it has been used to generate targeted gene 119
modifications in multiple plant species Arabidopsis thaliana Citrus sinensis Nicotiana 120
benthamiana Nicotiana tabaccum Oryza sativa Solanum lycopersicum Sorghum 121
bicolor Triticum aestivum (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) Zea mays (Liang et 122
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
7
al 2014) and Glycine max (Jacobs et al 2015) The majority of these studies 123
however report genome modifications in plants via NHEJ to generate mutations and 124
gene knock-outs While knock-outs are very valuable and allow gene function analysis 125
their application is limited HDR brings other opportunities in genome editing but has 126
been more challenging As a result reports describing successful gene editing or site-127
specific trait gene integration through HDR in plants are limited (Cai et al 2009 Shukla 128
et al 2009 Townsend et al 2009 Ainley et al 2013 DHalluin et al 2013 Li et al 129
2013 Shan et al 2013 Zhang et al 2013) 130
The data presented in this report demonstrate that the Cas9-gRNA system can 131
efficiently facilitate simultaneous multiple gene knockouts native gene editing and site-132
specific gene integration in maize Analysis of T1 plants established that the gene 133
knockouts edits and insertions were heritable and exhibited expected Mendelian 134
segregation This is the first report of Cas9-gRNA technology application in maize 135
demonstrating gene mutagenesis upon direct delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA 136
molecules native gene editing and site-specific gene integration 137
138
139
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
5
INTRODUCTION 62
The evolution of plant breeding one of the first scientific activities known in the 63
history of human kind has allowed rapid progress of our civilization and continues to be 64
important for the improvement of crops and sustainability of agriculture Traditional 65
breeding however is limited by the starting genetic diversity With the advent of 66
modern molecular biology breederrsquos options have been substantially broadened 67
allowing the purposeful transfer of genetic information from either related or diverse 68
organisms into different plant species thus specifically improving agricultural 69
performance The most common methods of DNA delivery particle bombardment and 70
Agrobacterium infection lead to random gene insertions throughout the genome 71
Integration of trait genes into a specific location is considerably more attractive and can 72
be accomplished through homology-directed repair (HDR) While a few publications 73
before 2009 have reported successful direct application of HDR to modify endogenous 74
plant genes this occurs at impractically low frequencies (Halfter et al 1992 Offringa et 75
al 1993 Miao and Lam 1995 Kempin et al 1997 Hanin et al 2001 Terada et al 76
2002 Terada et al 2007) Studies in different organisms including plants have 77
demonstrated that coincident generation of targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) 78
is central to improving the frequency (up to 1000-fold or more) of gene editing and site-79
specific gene insertion via HDR (Puchta et al 1993 Choulika et al 1995 Smih et al 80
1995 Puchta et al 1996) DSBs in eukaryotic cells can be repaired using two different 81
pathways ndash non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and HDR (Roth and Wilson 1986 82
Moore and Haber 1996 Puchta et al 1996 Jasin and Rothstein 2013) The NHEJ 83
pathway is most common in somatic cells and is prone to imperfect repair which results 84
in mutations such as deletions insertions inversions or translocations HDR although 85
less frequent can be directed by the addition of DNA molecules homologous to the 86
DSB region By using repair DNA templates that contain sequence variation or promote 87
the insertion of expression cassettes gene editing and site-specific gene integration can 88
be achieved 89
During the past decade different nucleases capable of generating targeted DSBs 90
were developed and have become important tools to improve gene editing and site-91
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
6
specific integration in different species including plants (Puchta and Fauser 2014 92
Voytas and Gao 2014 Kumar and Jain 2015) While Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) 93
customized homing endonucleases (meganucleases) and transcription activator-like 94
effector nucleases (TALENs) advanced genome editing the recently discovered Cas-95
guide RNA system has revolutionized the field (Doudna and Charpentier 2014 Hsu et 96
al 2014) This technology emerged from a bacterial adaptive defense system which 97
includes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and 98
CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease which protects the host from plasmid and viral 99
infection (Barrangou et al 2007) Three CRISPR-Cas systems (Type I II and III) with 100
different mechanisms have been described in bacteria and archea (Makarova et al 101
2011 Makarova et al 2011) Type II system is the most simple and requires a single 102
RNA-guided Cas9 protein for recognition and cleavage of invading DNA (Gasiunas et 103
al 2012 Jinek et al 2012) To generate site-specific DSB the system minimally 104
requires Cas9 protein and a duplex of CRISPR RNA (crRNA) a trans-encoded CRISPR 105
RNA (tracrRNA) and the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) which flanks 106
the 3rsquo end of the crRNA-targeted sequence (Gasiunas et al 2012 Cong et al 2013) It 107
has been demonstrated that fusion of the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single guide RNA 108
(gRNA) molecule not only simplified the system consisting now of two instead of three-109
components but also significantly improved the frequency of genomic DNA cleavage 110
(Jinek et al 2012 Mali et al 2013) Thus in contrast to ZFNs meganucleases and 111
TALENs which require sophisticated protein engineering to establish specific target site 112
recognition (Smith et al 2000 Arnould et al 2006 Smith et al 2006 Maeder et al 113
2008 Boch et al 2009 Weber et al 2011) Cas9-gRNA reagents are simple to design 114
Targeting of genomic sequences by Cas9-gRNA relies on binding of PAM nucleotides 115
(NGG for S pyogenes) by Cas9 and base-pairing of the gRNA to the adjacent target 116
site sequence 117
The Cas9-gRNA system has been shown to function in many different 118
organisms including plants To date it has been used to generate targeted gene 119
modifications in multiple plant species Arabidopsis thaliana Citrus sinensis Nicotiana 120
benthamiana Nicotiana tabaccum Oryza sativa Solanum lycopersicum Sorghum 121
bicolor Triticum aestivum (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) Zea mays (Liang et 122
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
7
al 2014) and Glycine max (Jacobs et al 2015) The majority of these studies 123
however report genome modifications in plants via NHEJ to generate mutations and 124
gene knock-outs While knock-outs are very valuable and allow gene function analysis 125
their application is limited HDR brings other opportunities in genome editing but has 126
been more challenging As a result reports describing successful gene editing or site-127
specific trait gene integration through HDR in plants are limited (Cai et al 2009 Shukla 128
et al 2009 Townsend et al 2009 Ainley et al 2013 DHalluin et al 2013 Li et al 129
2013 Shan et al 2013 Zhang et al 2013) 130
The data presented in this report demonstrate that the Cas9-gRNA system can 131
efficiently facilitate simultaneous multiple gene knockouts native gene editing and site-132
specific gene integration in maize Analysis of T1 plants established that the gene 133
knockouts edits and insertions were heritable and exhibited expected Mendelian 134
segregation This is the first report of Cas9-gRNA technology application in maize 135
demonstrating gene mutagenesis upon direct delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA 136
molecules native gene editing and site-specific gene integration 137
138
139
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
6
specific integration in different species including plants (Puchta and Fauser 2014 92
Voytas and Gao 2014 Kumar and Jain 2015) While Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) 93
customized homing endonucleases (meganucleases) and transcription activator-like 94
effector nucleases (TALENs) advanced genome editing the recently discovered Cas-95
guide RNA system has revolutionized the field (Doudna and Charpentier 2014 Hsu et 96
al 2014) This technology emerged from a bacterial adaptive defense system which 97
includes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and 98
CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease which protects the host from plasmid and viral 99
infection (Barrangou et al 2007) Three CRISPR-Cas systems (Type I II and III) with 100
different mechanisms have been described in bacteria and archea (Makarova et al 101
2011 Makarova et al 2011) Type II system is the most simple and requires a single 102
RNA-guided Cas9 protein for recognition and cleavage of invading DNA (Gasiunas et 103
al 2012 Jinek et al 2012) To generate site-specific DSB the system minimally 104
requires Cas9 protein and a duplex of CRISPR RNA (crRNA) a trans-encoded CRISPR 105
RNA (tracrRNA) and the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) which flanks 106
the 3rsquo end of the crRNA-targeted sequence (Gasiunas et al 2012 Cong et al 2013) It 107
has been demonstrated that fusion of the crRNA and tracrRNA into a single guide RNA 108
(gRNA) molecule not only simplified the system consisting now of two instead of three-109
components but also significantly improved the frequency of genomic DNA cleavage 110
(Jinek et al 2012 Mali et al 2013) Thus in contrast to ZFNs meganucleases and 111
TALENs which require sophisticated protein engineering to establish specific target site 112
recognition (Smith et al 2000 Arnould et al 2006 Smith et al 2006 Maeder et al 113
2008 Boch et al 2009 Weber et al 2011) Cas9-gRNA reagents are simple to design 114
Targeting of genomic sequences by Cas9-gRNA relies on binding of PAM nucleotides 115
(NGG for S pyogenes) by Cas9 and base-pairing of the gRNA to the adjacent target 116
site sequence 117
The Cas9-gRNA system has been shown to function in many different 118
organisms including plants To date it has been used to generate targeted gene 119
modifications in multiple plant species Arabidopsis thaliana Citrus sinensis Nicotiana 120
benthamiana Nicotiana tabaccum Oryza sativa Solanum lycopersicum Sorghum 121
bicolor Triticum aestivum (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) Zea mays (Liang et 122
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
7
al 2014) and Glycine max (Jacobs et al 2015) The majority of these studies 123
however report genome modifications in plants via NHEJ to generate mutations and 124
gene knock-outs While knock-outs are very valuable and allow gene function analysis 125
their application is limited HDR brings other opportunities in genome editing but has 126
been more challenging As a result reports describing successful gene editing or site-127
specific trait gene integration through HDR in plants are limited (Cai et al 2009 Shukla 128
et al 2009 Townsend et al 2009 Ainley et al 2013 DHalluin et al 2013 Li et al 129
2013 Shan et al 2013 Zhang et al 2013) 130
The data presented in this report demonstrate that the Cas9-gRNA system can 131
efficiently facilitate simultaneous multiple gene knockouts native gene editing and site-132
specific gene integration in maize Analysis of T1 plants established that the gene 133
knockouts edits and insertions were heritable and exhibited expected Mendelian 134
segregation This is the first report of Cas9-gRNA technology application in maize 135
demonstrating gene mutagenesis upon direct delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA 136
molecules native gene editing and site-specific gene integration 137
138
139
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
7
al 2014) and Glycine max (Jacobs et al 2015) The majority of these studies 123
however report genome modifications in plants via NHEJ to generate mutations and 124
gene knock-outs While knock-outs are very valuable and allow gene function analysis 125
their application is limited HDR brings other opportunities in genome editing but has 126
been more challenging As a result reports describing successful gene editing or site-127
specific trait gene integration through HDR in plants are limited (Cai et al 2009 Shukla 128
et al 2009 Townsend et al 2009 Ainley et al 2013 DHalluin et al 2013 Li et al 129
2013 Shan et al 2013 Zhang et al 2013) 130
The data presented in this report demonstrate that the Cas9-gRNA system can 131
efficiently facilitate simultaneous multiple gene knockouts native gene editing and site-132
specific gene integration in maize Analysis of T1 plants established that the gene 133
knockouts edits and insertions were heritable and exhibited expected Mendelian 134
segregation This is the first report of Cas9-gRNA technology application in maize 135
demonstrating gene mutagenesis upon direct delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA 136
molecules native gene editing and site-specific gene integration 137
138
139
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
8
RESULTS 140
141
Targeted Mutations in Maize 142
To test whether maize-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 endonuclease can generate 143
DSBs and alter maize sequences through error-prone NHEJ repair 12 different sites at 144
5 genomic locations were targeted for cleavage (Fig 1 and Supplemental Table S1) 145
These target sequences were selected first by identifying the NGG PAM sequence 146
required for S pyogenes Cas9 and then capturing the 17-24 nucleotides immediately 147
upstream of the PAM sequence for use as the spacer in the gRNA To ensure good U6 148
polymerase III expression and not introduce a mismatch within the gRNA spacer all 149
target sequences contained a G at their 5rsquo end Two of these locations one near 150
liguleless-1 and another within the 5th exon of the maize fertility gene MS26 were 151
previously mutated in corn by custom designed homing endonucleases named LIG34 152
(Gao et al 2010) and Ems26 (Djukanovic et al 2013) respectively To indirectly 153
compare the efficiency of generating DSBs by Cas9-gRNA to these homing 154
endonucleases maize immature embryos were bombarded with DNA vectors 155
containing constitutively expressed meganucleases (LIG34 Ems26) or Cas9 156
components (S pyogenes Cas9 ZmUbiCas9 and gRNAs ZmPolIIIgRNA) and helper 157
genes (ODP2 and Wus) then analyzed by amplicon sequencing for the presence of 158
mutations at the target sites Embryos bombarded with either Cas9 or gRNA DNA 159
expression cassettes served as controls Embryos were harvested 7 days after 160
bombardment total genomic DNA extracted and fragments surrounding the targeted 161
sequences were amplified by PCR Barcoded PCR amplicons were sequenced to an 162
approximate depth of 400000 to 800000 reads aligned to their reference sequence 163
and analyzed It is important to emphasize that during bombardment only a small 164
percentage of embryo cells receive vectors with Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes 165
while the majority of the cells were not transformed and would be expected to contain 166
unmodified DNA sequences As shown in Table 1 in contrast to controls Cas9-gRNA 167
treated embryos yielded a high frequency of mutations With the exception of one 168
gRNA (MS45-CR1) the majority of the gRNAs tested yielded mutation frequencies 169
greater than 13 Notably embryos transformed with gRNAs that targeted the same 170
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
9
sequences as LIG34 and Ems26 endonucleases yielded 10- to 20-fold higher mutation 171
frequencies (39 vs 02 and 175 vs 013 respectively) Ten of the most 172
prevalent mutations generated by either the LIG-CR3 gRNA or the LIG34 homing 173
endonuclease are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 In contrast to the predominance 174
of various size deletions present in the sequences derived from the LIG34 175
endonuclease treated embryos and in agreement with previous reports (Feng et al 176
2014) the most common types of mutations promoted by LIG-CR3 guided Cas9 were 177
single nucleotide insertions and single nucleotide deletions Similar results were 178
observed for all other gRNAs used in this study (data not shown) 179
Maize embryos stably transformed by co-bombardment with Cas9 gRNA and 180
selectable and visible marker gene (MoPAT-DsRED) were resistant to treatment with 181
bialaphos due to the presence of the phosphinotricin acetyl transferase gene MoPAT 182
and displayed red fluorescence These traits allowed selection and growth of 183
transformed calli regeneration of fertile plants and evaluation of inheritance of the 184
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
10
Cas9-gRNA induced mutations describe above in subsequent generations As shown in 185
Table 2 mutations were recovered at all targeted loci when multiple gRNA expression 186
cassettes were introduced either in duplex or triplex with mutant read frequencies 187
similar to those when gRNAs were delivered individually These results demonstrate 188
that the maize codon-optimized RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously introduce 189
mutations at multiple loci in a single transformation experiment The frequency of stable 190
event recovery has been reported to be an indicator of cytotoxicity due to off-target 191
recognition for ZFNs in human cell lines and plants (Cornu et al 2007 Szczepek et al 192
2007 Townsend et al 2009) In this multiplex experiment the frequency of 193
establishing callus sectors growing on selection was very similar (more than 1 event per 194
embryo when helper genes are co-bombarded) to the frequency in control experiments 195
(no gRNA delivery) Normal event recovery suggests that for the gRNAs used in this 196
experiment off-target activity was either absent or below a level sufficient to confer 197
detectable cytotoxicity 198
Red fluorescing callus indicative of a stably integrated DsRED gene were used 199
to regenerate plants from these multiplex gRNA experiments Thirty T0 plants (25 200
duplex and 5 triplex) were selected for mutation detection at the target site by copy-201
number determination using qPCR and by direct sequencing of the targeted alleles 202
qPCR analysis revealed that all 30 plants were mutated at the corresponding target 203
sites with a high percentage of plants containing bi-allelic mutations (LIGCas-3 ndash 91 204
MS26Cas-2 ndash 77 MS45Cas-2 ndash 100 Supplemental Table S2) To corroborate the 205
results generated by qPCR DNA fragments spanning these three target sites were 206
amplified by PCR cloned and sequenced from selected plants Sequencing data were 207
in agreement with the qPCR results confirming the high frequency of mutations at all 208
three sites (Table 3) and as expected T0 plants containing bi-allelic mutations at either 209
Ms26 or Ms45 were male sterile (Cigan et al 2001 Djukanovic et al 2013) (data not 210
shown) Plants were also screened by Cas9 and guideRNA-specific PCR 211
(Supplemental Table S3) for the presence of stably integrated copies of Cas9 and 212
gRNA DNA expression cassettes As shown in Table 3 plant 5 did not contain 213
detectable Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes suggesting that transient delivery of 214
DNA vectors was sufficient to confer biallelic mutations in this experiment Due to this 215
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
11
observation this plant was selected for transmission studies This plant was fertilized 216
using pollen from wild-type Hi-II plants to produce T1 progeny Examination of these T1 217
plants by qPCR and DNA sequencing demonstrated sexual transmission of parental 218
mutations with expected segregation ratios for all three sites tested (LIGCas-3 ndash 1615 219
[Wt+T] MS26Cas-2 ndash 1412 [Wt+AWt+G] MS45Cas-2 ndash 1413[Wt+TWtdel) 220
Additional plants pollinated with wild-type pollen and containing multiple biallelic gene 221
mutations in the first generation were observed to transmit these mutant alleles to 222
progeny in an expected Mendelian fashion (data not shown) These results 223
demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can simultaneously cleave multiple chromosomal 224
loci and sexually transmit these mutations to progeny 225
226
Transient gRNA Delivery into Cells with Pre-Integrated Cas9 Generates Mutations 227
in Maize 228
As described above co-delivery of DNA vectors containing Cas9 and gRNA 229
expression cassettes into maize embryos yielded heritable mutations However it has 230
been shown in Arabidopsis (Feng et al 2014) and wheat (Wang et al 2014) that 231
progeny plants often do not follow expected Mendelian (11) segregation In the present 232
study segregation distortion was also observed in progeny of two T0 plants (data not 233
shown) One possibility is that stable integration and constitutive expression of gRNAs 234
and Cas9 endonuclease in T0 and T1 plants leads to somatic mutations and 235
consequently to chimeric plants To overcome the potential problems associated with 236
stable integration of DNA vectors containing Cas9-gRNA components gRNA in the 237
form of in vitro synthesized RNA molecules was co-bombarded with the Cas9 DNA 238
vector and analyzed for mutations by amplicon sequencing 7 days post-transformation 239
As shown in Table 4 in contrast to the delivery of both Cas9 and gRNA expressed from 240
DNA vectors the mutation frequencies observed when LIG-CR3 gRNA delivered as 241
RNA were approximately 100-fold lower (26 vs 002 respectively) 242
One possible explanation for this difference may be the requirement for 243
coincident function of Cas9 and gRNA was not met when gRNA was delivered as RNA 244
and Cas9 as a DNA vector To test this idea two Agrobacterium vectors (Supplemental 245
Fig S2) containing maize-codon optimized Cas9 under the transcriptional control of a 246
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
12
constitutive (maize UBI) or a temperature regulated (maize MDH) promoter were 247
introduced into Hi-II embryo cells to establish lines containing pre-integrated genomic 248
copies of Cas9 endonuclease These Agrobacterium T-DNAs also contained an 249
embryo-preferred END2 promoter regulating the expression of a blue-fluorescence 250
gene (AmCYAN) as a visible marker and an interrupted copy of the DsRED gene 251
transcriptionally regulated by a maize Histone 2B promoter Part of the DsRED 252
sequence was duplicated in a direct orientation (369 bp fragment) and consisted of two 253
fragments of the DsRED (RF-FP) gene which were separated by a 347 bp spacer that 254
could be targeted by gRNAs (Supplemental data) DSBs within the spacer region 255
promote intramolecular recombination restoring function to the disrupted DsRED gene 256
which results in red fluorescing cells Maize plants with single-copy T-DNA inserts 257
containing either UBICas9 or MDHCas9 were used as a source of immature embryos 258
for delivery of gRNAs as DNA expression cassettes or as described later as in vitro 259
transcribed RNA Blue-fluorescing embryos containing pre-integrated Cas9 were 260
excised and incubated at 280C (UBICas9) or at 370C (MDHCas9) for 24 hours Post-261
bombardment embryos with MDHCas9 were incubated at 370C for 24 hours and then 262
moved to 280C As shown in Supplemental Figure S3 in contrast to control (no gRNA) 263
UBICas9 and MDHCas9 containing embryos bombarded with two DNA-expressed 264
gRNAs that targeted sequences within the 347 bp spacer readily produced red 265
fluorescing foci after 5 days demonstrating expression of functional Cas9 protein in 266
these plants 267
To measure mutation frequencies at the LIG and MS26 endogenous target sites 268
LIG-CR3 and MS26-CR2 gRNAs as DNA vectors (25 ngshot) or as RNA molecules 269
(100 ngshot) were delivered into MDHCas9 and UBICas9 containing embryo cells 270
with temperature treatments described above In these experiments embryos were 271
harvested two days post-bombardment and analyzed by amplicon sequencing As 272
opposed to the results observed in the previous experiment nearly similar frequencies 273
were detected for gRNAs delivered as DNA vectors and as RNA molecules particularly 274
in the case of Cas9 regulated by the Ubiquitin promoter (Table 4) Together these data 275
demonstrate that delivery of gRNA in the form of RNA directly into maize cells 276
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
13
containing a pre-integrated Cas9 is a viable alternative to DNA delivery for the 277
generation of mutations in plant cells 278
279
Editing Maize ALS2 280
Sulfonylurea herbicides prevent branched amino acid biosynthesis in plants due 281
to the inhibition of the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Haughn et al 1988 Lee et 282
al 1988 Yu and Powles 2014) Resistance to one of these herbicides chlorsulfuron 283
has been described as a result of single amino acid changes in the ALS protein at 284
position 197 in Arabidopsis (Pro to Ser) (Haughn et al 1988) and tobacco (Pro to Gln 285
or Ala) (Lee et al 1988) and at a corresponding location position 178 in soybean (Pro 286
to Ser) (Walter et al 2014) 287
ALS was chosen for gene editing to demonstrate that RNA-guided Cas9 can 288
facilitate specific DNA sequence changes in a native maize gene There are two ALS 289
genes in maize ALS1 and ALS2 located on chromosomes 4 and 5 respectively (Burr 290
and Burr 1991) with 94 sequence identity at the DNA level In the first experiments 291
gRNA-expressing DNA vectors targeting three different sites within both ALS1 and 292
ALS2 genes were tested (Fig 1D and Supplemental Table S1) As these gRNAs were 293
not gene-specific both ALS1 and ALS2 were mutated with approximately the same 294
efficiency (data not shown) and resulted in low stable event recovery As acetolactate 295
synthase is a critical enzyme for cell function in plants callus events containing 296
simultaneous bi-allelic knockouts of ALS1 and ALS2 genes would not be expected to 297
survive It is likely that the rare events recovered in this experiment did not receive 298
gRNA or Cas9 necessary to generate mutations and therefore contained one or more 299
functional ALS alleles Alternatively alleles may have been mutated but still retained 300
wild-type function To overcome this problem an ALS2 specific ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 301
2A) was designed based on the polymorphisms between ALS1 and ALS2 nucleotide 302
sequences and tested As shown in Figure 2B amplicon sequence analysis revealed 303
that ALS2 was highly preferred over ALS1 when ALS-CR4 gRNA was used One 304
important difference contributing to this result was that ALS1 lacks an NGG PAM 305
sequence required for DNA cleavage by the S pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease 306
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
14
To generate ALS2 edited alleles a 794 bp fragment of homology was cloned into 307
a plasmid vector and two 127 nt single-stranded DNA oligos were tested as repair 308
templates (Fig 2C) The 794 bp fragment had the same sequence modifications as 309
Oligo1 Repair templates contained several nucleotide changes in comparison to the 310
native sequence (Fig 2C and Supplemental data) Single-stranded Oligo1 and the 794 311
bp repair templates included a single nucleotide change which would direct editing of 312
DNA sequences corresponding to the proline at amino acid position 165 to a serine 313
(P165S) as well as three additional changes within the ALS-CR4 target site and PAM 314
sequence Modification of the PAM sequence within the repair template altered the 315
methionine codon (AUG) to isoleucine (AUU) which naturally occurs in the ALS1 gene 316
(Fig 2 A and C) A second 127 nt single-stranded oligo repair template (Oligo2) was 317
also tested which preserved the methionine at position 157 but contained three 318
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
15
additional single nucleotide changes in the sequence which would influence base 319
pairing with the ALS-CR4 gRNA (Fig 2C) 320
Approximately 1000 immature embryos per treatment were bombarded with the 321
two oligo or single plasmid repair templates Cas9 ALS-CR4 gRNA and MoPAT-322
DsRED in DNA expression cassettes and placed on media to select for bialaphos 323
resistance conferred by PAT Five weeks post-transformation two hundred (per 324
treatment) randomly selected independent young callus sectors growing on selective 325
media were separated from the embryos and transferred to fresh bialaphos plates The 326
remaining embryos (gt800 per treatment) with developing callus events were transferred 327
to the plates containing 100 ppm of chlorosulfuron as direct selection for an edited ALS2 328
gene A month later a total of 384 randomly picked callus sectors growing on bialaphos 329
(approximately 130 events for each repair template) and 7 callus sectors that continued 330
growing on media with chlorsulfuron were analyzed by PCR amplification and 331
sequencing Edited ALS2 alleles were detected in nine callus sectors two derived from 332
the callus sectors growing on bialaphos and generated using the 794 bp repair DNA 333
template and the remaining 7 derived from chlorosulfuron resistant callus sectors 334
edited using the 127 nt single-stranded oligos three by Oligo1 and four by Oligo2 (Fig 335
2D and Supplemental Table S4) The second ALS2 allele in these callus sectors was 336
mutated as a result of NHEJ repair (data not shown) Analysis of the ALS1 gene 337
revealed only wild-type sequence confirming high specificity of the ALS-CR4 gRNA 338
Plants were regenerated from 7 out of 9 callus sectors containing edited ALS2 339
alleles for additional molecular analysis and progeny testing DNA sequence analysis of 340
ALS2 alleles confirmed the presence of the P165S modifications as well as the other 341
nucleotide changes associated with the respective repair templates T1 and T2 progeny 342
of two T0 plants generated from different callus events (794 bp repair DNA and Oligo2) 343
were analyzed to evaluate the inheritance of the edited ALS2 alleles Progeny plants 344
derived from crosses using pollen from wild type Hi-II plants were analyzed by 345
sequencing and demonstrated sexual transmission of the edited alleles observed in the 346
parent plant with expected 11 segregation ratio (5756 and 4749 respectively) To test 347
whether the edited ALS sequence confers herbicide resistance selected four-week old 348
segregating T1 plants with edited and wild-type ALS2 alleles were sprayed with four 349
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
16
different concentrations of chlorsulfuron (50 100 (1x) 200 and 400 mgliter) Three 350
weeks after treatment plants with an edited allele showed normal phenotype while 351
plants with only wild-type alleles demonstrated strong signs of senescence (Fig 3A) In 352
addition embryos isolated from seed that had been pollinated with wild-type HI-II pollen 353
were germinated on media with 100 ppm of chlorsulfuron Fourteen days after 354
germination plants with edited alleles showed normal height and a well-developed root 355
system while plants with wild-type alleles were short and did not develop roots (Fig 356
3B) 357
These experiments demonstrate that Cas9-gRNA can stimulate HDR-dependent 358
targeted sequence modifications in maize resulting in plants with an edited endogenous 359
gene which properly transmits to subsequent generations 360
361
HDR-Mediated Gene Insertion 362
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
17
In contrast to Agrobacterium- or biolistic-mediated delivery of trait genes which can 363
often result in random insertions and potential disruption of native gene function 364
double-strand breaks using site-directed nucleases would allow for precise gene 365
integration at a desired genomic location In this experiment given the differences in 366
mutation frequencies observed between RNA-guided Cas9 and meganucleases 367
described above the ability of these two DSB technologies to promote site-specific 368
gene insertion was compared in maize As LIG-CR3-guided Cas9 cleaves genomic 369
DNA at the same position as LIG34 meganuclease these DSB reagents were selected 370
for this study DNA donor repair template contained the constitutively expressed PAT 371
gene (UBIMoPAT) flanked by approximately 10 kb of DNA fragments homologous to 372
genomic sequences immediately adjacent to the LIG cleavage site (Supplemental Fig 373
S1 S4 and Supplemental data) This donor vector was co-bombarded with Cas9 and 374
LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassettes or LIG34 homing endonuclease vector In a 375
separate experiment Cas9 gRNA and a modified donor DNA template containing UBI 376
regulated MoPAT-DsRED fusion flanked with the same regions of homology were 377
delivered on the same vector (Supplemental Fig S4) To compare different delivery 378
systems this vector was moved into Agrobacterium strain LBA4044 and used in an 379
Agrobacterium-meditated transformation experiment 380
As delivery of the donor DNA would result in both random and targeted 381
insertions approximately two month old callus sectors growing on bialaphos-containing 382
media were screened for mutations and gene insertions at the LIG target site In 383
contrast to sectors derived from biolistic-transformed LIG34 meganuclease qPCR 384
copy-number analysis revealed that Cas9-gRNA yielded a higher target site mutation 385
frequency (gt83 vs 6 mutant reads Table 5) Notably for the Cas9-gRNA system 386
the mutation frequency was independent of the delivery method (bombardment or 387
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation) Callus events that contained site-specific 388
gene insertions were identified by junction PCR using primer pairs shown in Figure 4A 389
Amplification products from positive integration events were verified by subcloning and 390
sequencing As shown in Table 5 two of the 288 callus events in the meganuclease 391
experiment yielded amplicons across both junctions (07 HDR frequency) while 392
biolistic delivery of Cas9-gRNA and donor DNA resulted in frequencies of 25 and 4 393
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
18
when used either separately or as a single vector respectively Screening of the 192 394
callus events from Agrobacterium-mediated delivery did not produce amplicons 395
indicative of HDR-mediated gene insertions (Table 5) suggesting that biolistic 396
transformation is the preferred delivery method to generate gene insertions at the LIG 397
site in maize 398
T0 plants regenerated from 7 independent HDR positive events generated in the 399
experiment when donor DNA Cas9 and gRNA were delivered separately were used 400
for additional molecular characterization DNA blot hybridization analysis of 401
regenerated plants was conducted using genomic- and donor DNA-specific probes 402
shown in Figure 4A These analyses in addition to sequencing across the entire 403
inserted fragment (Supplemental data) demonstrated that plants regenerated from two 404
events (Events 1 and 2) contained a single copy of an intact MoPAT gene indicative of 405
homology-directed gene insertion at the LIG target site (Fig 4) Plants regenerated 406
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
19
from the remaining 5 events contained extra rearranged and randomly integrated 407
copies of MoPAT It should be noted that upon further molecular examination of Events 408
1 and 2 by PCR analysis the Cas9 and gRNA DNA vectors were not detected in plants 409
suggesting that transient expression of these components was sufficient to stimulate 410
gene integration 411
To examine transmission and segregation of MoPAT T0 plants from Events 1 412
and 2 were fertilized with wild-type pollen to produce T1 seeds Ninety-six T1 progeny 413
plants from Event 1 and 64 plants from Event 2 were analyzed by junction PCR and gel 414
electrophoresis and demonstrated expected Mendelian segregation of the gene 415
integrated at the LIG target site (4848 and 3133 respectively) DNA hybridization 416
analysis performed on 20 random junction PCR positive T1 plants from both events 417
using DNA probes described above confirmed nuclear stability and integrity of MoPAT 418
in progeny plants (data not shown) 419
Together these genetic and molecular data demonstrate that maize optimized 420
RNA-guided Cas9 can be used to stimulate homology-directed repair for the insertion of 421
genes at specific locations in maize chromosomes Moreover in these experiments the 422
frequency of site-specific trait integration depended upon the endonuclease target site 423
cleavage efficiency and repair template delivery method 424
425
426
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
20
DISCUSSION 427
During the past decade several technologies ZFNs meganucleases TALENs 428
and recently Cas9-gRNA system were developed to generate targeted DSB that can 429
be used for genome editing by NHEJ or HDR DSB technologies have three major 430
applications in plant biotechnology gene mutagenesis resulting in gene knock-outs 431
gene editing allowing modification of a gene product or metabolic pathway in a desired 432
way and site-specific trait insertion which would allow gene stacking in plant breeding 433
programs Here we reported successful application of the Cas9-gRNA technology to 434
generate multiple gene knock-outs ALS2 gene editing resulting in plants resistant to 435
chlorsulfuron and site-specific gene integration in an important crop species maize 436
437
Guide RNA Evaluation by Amplicon Sequencing 438
Maize transformation is a time consuming process often taking three to four 439
months from DNA delivery into immature embryo cells to plant regeneration Thus 440
testing the DSB reagents is an important step in developing proper tools for genome 441
editing experiments The rapid method based on amplicon sequencing described here 442
allows for evaluation of mutation frequencies at any chromosomal site targeted by 443
different gRNAs within two weeks after transformation Analysis of multiple gRNAs 444
(including ones not presented in this report) indicated that gt90 of the guides tested led 445
to a high frequency of mutations at the corresponding target sites Additional studies 446
will be needed to determine if the inability of certain guide RNAs that did not promote 447
high frequencies of mutations in planta can be attributed to such factors as target site 448
accessibility secondary structure of gRNA molecules andor high frequency of flawless 449
DSB repair at some target sites 450
451
NHEJ-Mediated Gene Mutagenesis 452
Selected gRNAs with high mutation frequencies were used in multiplexed 453
(duplexed and triplexed) targeted mutagenesis experiments All genes were targeted 454
with 100 success rate and more than 80 of the regenerated T0 plants contained 455
biallelic mutations These results along with previous publications illustrate that the 456
Cas9-gRNA technology can be used to efficiently promote the alteration of individual or 457
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
21
multiple gene sequences (for review see Kumar and Jain 2015) gene families or 458
homologous genes in polyploid species (Wang et al 2014) and delete chromosomal 459
segments of various sizes (Brooks et al 2014 Zhou et al 2014 Gao et al 2015) In 460
this report analysis of T0 plants and T1 segregating populations indicated that stably 461
integrated Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes remain active often resulting in 462
chimeric T0 plants and segregation distortions Similar observations have been 463
previously reported in several plant species (Brooks et al 2014 Feng et al 2014 464
Jiang et al 2014 Wang et al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) At the same time T0 plants 465
regenerated from callus events without integrated Cas9-gRNA components were not 466
chimeric and exhibited proper sexual transmission of the mutated alleles to the next 467
generation These results suggest that transient delivery of Cas9 and gRNA is sufficient 468
to mutagenize multiple alleles and can speed the discovery and breeding process In 469
mammalian systems both Cas9 and gRNA can be delivered transiently in the form of 470
RNA-protein complex providing high mutation frequencies (Kim et al 2014 Lin et al 471
2014 Zuris et al 2015) However this approach has limited application among plant 472
species due to the currently available transformation methods Therefore one method 473
to limit the Cas9-gRNA system to transient activity is to deliver gRNA in the form of RNA 474
molecules rather than DNA expression cassettes In this report simultaneous delivery 475
of gRNA in the form of RNA and a DNA vector containing a Cas9 expression cassette 476
yielded about 100-fold lower frequencies of mutations in comparison to the control in 477
which both components were delivered as DNA vectors Because Cas9-gRNA is a two 478
component system both gRNA and Cas9 protein must be present in a cell at the same 479
time In the experiment in which gRNA and a Cas9 gene were delivered 480
simultaneously this condition likely was not met due to the predicted rapid turnover of 481
RNA molecules and the delayed and therefore non-coincidental expression of 482
functional Cas9 protein encoded on a DNA vector To overcome this challenge maize 483
lines containing constitutively or conditionally expressed pre-integrated Cas9 were 484
generated Amplicon sequence analysis performed on embryos two days after 485
transformation demonstrated that transient gRNA delivery into the maize embryo cells 486
with pre-integrated Cas9 resulted in mutation frequencies comparable to delivery of 487
Cas9 and gRNA as DNA vectors It is likely that the frequency of mutations would be 488
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
22
reduced in comparison to the experiments when DNA vectors were used to deliver 489
gRNAs because expression cassettes often stably integrate into the genome and as 490
the result the Cas9-gRNA system continues to be active Nevertheless delivery of 491
gRNA as RNA may not limit successful gene editing and site-specific gene integration 492
as gene insertion events were recovered without stable integration of either Cas9 or 493
gRNA expression vectors Therefore gRNA delivery in the form of RNA can be a viable 494
alternative to gRNA delivery in DNA vectors for plant gene and genome editing 495
496
HDR-Mediated Gene Editing and Targeted Gene Insertion 497
While gene mutagenesis can be the result of the error-prone process of DNA 498
DSB repair through NHEJ gene editing and targeted gene integration rely on the HDR 499
repair pathway Cas9-gRNA has been well documented in different plant species for 500
targeted gene mutagenesis both single and multiplexed (for review see Kumar and 501
Jain 2015) however examples of HDR-mediated gene editing and site-specific gene 502
insertion have been limited to model systems (Li et al 2013 Shan et al 2013) Until 503
now delivery of the gene of interest and its targeted insertion via HDR in plants remains 504
a serious challenge (Feng et al 2013 Voytas and Gao 2014) 505
Genes and genomes in many important crop species are often present in 506
multiple copies due to rearrangements duplications andor polyploidization In some 507
instances all copies of a gene may need to be mutagenized to result in complete 508
inactivation However in some cases only one copy of a gene family would require 509
editing to produce a desired phenotype In the present study the acetolactate synthase 510
(ALS) gene was chosen to test the ability of the Cas9-gRNA system to facilitate 511
endogenous gene editing via HDR in maize immature embryo cells transformed by 512
particle bombardment ALS is a well characterized gene family consisting of two genes 513
ALS1 and ALS2 which can be edited to confer plant resistance to sulfonylurea class 514
herbicides Several gRNAs targeting both genes simultaneously or ALS2 uniquely 515
were tested Delivery of a guideRNA targeting both ALS1 and ALS2 lead to low 516
recovery of stable events likely due to the high frequency of biallelic knock-out 517
mutations and the important nature of the gene However when an ALS2-specific 518
gRNA was tested typical frequencies of event recovery were observed To edit ALS2 519
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
23
three different repair templates (double-stranded vector DNA and two single-stranded 520
oligos) were tested All three experimental designs resulted in editing of ALS2 521
indicating that small single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were sufficient for gene 522
editing experiments in maize Although all regenerated plants contained integrated and 523
presumably functional copies of Cas9 and gRNA expression cassettes only wild-type 524
alleles of ALS1 were observed suggesting high targeting specificity by the ALS2-CR4 525
gRNA This experiment demonstrated that by carefully choosing target sites and 526
corresponding gRNAs multiple or individual genes within a family may be targeted if 527
sufficient nucleotide polymorphisms are present between the family members 528
Targeted gene insertion allows clustering of multiple genes in a genomic location 529
which would allow for segregation as a single locus significantly simplifying the 530
breeding process Previously gene insertion at a specific target site was demonstrated 531
using ZFNs in tobacco (Cai et al 2009) and maize (Shukla et al 2009 Ainley et al 532
2013) and meganucleases in cotton (DHalluin et al 2013) The Cas9-gRNA system 533
was tested for its ability to facilitate targeted gene insertion in maize immature embryo 534
cells in comparison to a meganuclease targeting the same genomic location Two 535
different delivery systems biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were 536
tested Only particle bombardment experiments resulted in events with a gene inserted 537
into the target site through an HDR process Delivery of the donor DNA on the same 538
plasmid with Cas9-gRNA components yielded approximately two times higher 539
frequency of integration events in comparison to experiments in which components 540
were delivered as separate vectors In this experiment Cas9-gRNA yielded 541
approximately 5 times more integration events than LIG34 meganuclease This 542
observed difference was likely due to the higher activity of Cas9-LIG-CR-3 gRNA as 543
determined by the mutation frequencies measured at the target site The inability to 544
recovery integration events in the Agrobacterium-mediated experiment may be 545
explained by the low number of copies of the T-DNA delivered into the plant cell 546
compared with particle bombardment which delivers multiple copies of all DNA 547
molecules However this does not necessarily mean that Agrobacterium transformation 548
cannot result in HDR-mediated gene integration but likely indicates lower frequency of 549
such events (Svitashev unpublished observations) Therefore selection of a delivery 550
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
24
method is very important and should be considered based on the goal of individual 551
experiments 552
The efficiency of gene editing and targeted gene insertions has typically been 553
associated with the activity of a nuclease and therefore frequency of mutations at a 554
given target site Although the ability of a nuclease to generate DSB is the most 555
important condition this is not the only requirement and can sometimes be misleading 556
in predicting frequency of HDR at the target site Factors such as efficiency of DSB 557
repair target site accessibility presence of repetitive sequences close to the target site 558
and yet to be discovered factors may significantly affect frequencies of gene editing and 559
targeted gene insertions Our unpublished data indicate that although similar mutation 560
rates can be observed at different target sites gene editing and gene insertion 561
frequencies can vary from less than 1 to as high as 15 562
563
CONCLUSIONS 564
Only three years after the first publications introduced the Cas-gRNA system it 565
has become the DSB technology of choice for many laboratories working in the field of 566
genome editing The advantages of the system lay not only in its simplicity and activity 567
but also in its versatility to more fully address problems associated with DSB technology 568
applications in plant biology These challenges include the inability to generate DSBs at 569
a specific genomic location and lack of complete specificity that can result in off-target 570
DNA cleavage In the not too distant future increasing the density of target sites may 571
be achieved by the discovery and utilization of new Cas9 proteins with different PAM 572
recognition sequences PAM diversity would be particularly useful in plant species with 573
high AT content while longer PAM sequences may increase the proportion of unique 574
and highly specific target sites Testing of S pyogenes Cas9-gRNA in a variety of plant 575
species has resulted in extremely low frequency of non-specific DNA cleavage and 576
therefore high specificity of the system (Feng et al 2013 Shan et al 2013 Brooks et 577
al 2014 Zhang et al 2014) While targeting various sites may yield different results 578
incorporation of the Cas9 D10A nickase (Gasiunas et al 2012) may further improve 579
gene editing options for Cas9 as the nickase version has been successfully applied to 580
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
25
improve specificity (Mali et al 2013 Cho et al 2014 Fauser et al 2014) 581
Furthermore transient delivery of purified Cas9 protein and gRNA (as a 582
ribonucleoprotein complex) into human culture cells has demonstrated high frequencies 583
of targeted mutagenesis and gene editing while reducing off-target mutations (Kim et 584
al 2014 Lin et al 2014) These combined approaches may further improve the 585
precision and accuracy of genome modification in plants Thus targeted mutagenesis 586
or editing of specific genes or gene families to yield new allelic variants will no longer be 587
a limiting step for the discovery of gene function and establishment of their relationship 588
to complex biological pathways Adoption of robust genome modification methods to 589
introduce genetic variation aided by inexpensive sequencing and new plant 590
transformation methods will accelerate the continued development of new breeding 591
techniques to address challenges of modern agriculture 592
593
MATERIALS AND METHODS 594
595
Plasmids and Reagents Used for Plant Transformation 596
Standard DNA techniques as described in Sambrook et al (Sambrook et al 597
1898) were used for vector construction The Cas9 sequence from Streptococcus 598
pyogenes M1 GAS (SF370) was maize codon-optimized and designed to contain the 599
potato ST-LS1 intron (Accession number X04753 (nucleotides 2837-2892) at 600
nucleotide position (+402-591) To facilitate nuclear localization of the Cas9 protein in 601
maize cells the SV40 (MAPKKKRKV) and the A tumefaciens VirD2 602
(KRPRDRHDGELGGRKRAR) nuclear localization signals were added at the amino and 603
carboxyl-termini of the Cas9 open reading frame respectively (Supplemental data) 604
The chemically synthesized Cas9 gene contained on a 4335 kb NcoI-HpaI DNA 605
fragment was subcloned into PHP17720 (Sabelli et al 2009) digested with NcoI-HpaI 606
which links Cas9 to a maize constitutive Ubiquitin-1 promoter including the first intron (ndash607
899 to+1092 Christensen et al 1992) while transcription is terminated by the addition 608
of the 3rsquo sequences from the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene (PinII) (nucleotides 2ndash609
310 (An et al 1989) to generate UBICas9 vector Single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were 610
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
26
designed using the methods described by Mali et al 2013 A maize U6 polymerase III 611
promoter and terminator residing on chromosome 8 (nt 165535024-165536023 Maize 612
(B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) were isolated and used to direct initiation 613
and termination of gRNAs respectively Two BbsI restriction endonuclease sites were 614
introduced in an inverted tandem orientation with cleavage orientated in an outward 615
direction as described in Cong et al 2013 to facilitate the rapid introduction of maize 616
genomic DNA target sequences into the gRNA expression constructs (Supplemental 617
data) Only target sequences starting with a G nucleotide were used to promote 618
favorable polymerase III expression of the gRNA The guideRNA expression cassettes 619
contained on a 11 kb XhoI-EcoRI DNA fragment were subcloned into Bluescript SK 620
vectors and used for bombardment and subsequent vector construction 621
Two Agrobacterium-transformation vectors were designed and introduced into 622
maize to generate stably integrated Cas9 expression cassettes To generate 623
constitutively expressed Cas9 the UBICas9 vector was digested with HindIII-EcoRI to 624
release a 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment (UBICas9) and this fragment was subcloned 625
into HindIII-EcoRI digested plasmid pSB11 (Ishida et al 1996) To generate the 626
UBICas9 T-DNA vector the pSB11-UbiCas9 vector was digested with NotI and a 58 627
kb NotI fragment containing the blue-fluorescence gene (CFP AmCYAN1 Clontech 628
Laboratories Inc CA USA) regulated by the maize END2 promoter (Chromosome 8 nt 629
171120325-171119383 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) a visible 630
marker for the identification of transformed embryos) and a red fluorescence gene 631
(pDsRED Express Product number 632412 Clontech Laboratories Inc CA USA) 632
regulated by the maize Histone 2B promoter (Chromosome 3 nt 16569805ndash16571259 633
Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v38)) was subcloned downstream of 634
UBICas9 A portion of DsRED gene in this vector was duplicated (nt 148-516) in a 635
direct orientation with 369 bp of overlap The duplicated fragments were separated by a 636
347-bp spacer contained sequences compatible for recognition and targeting by gRNAs 637
and the LIG34 meganuclease (Supplemental Fig S2) To generate a conditionally 638
expressed Cas9 (MDHCas9) a 1048 bp fragment of temperature regulated promoter 639
from the maize mannitol dehydrogenase gene (MDH Chromosome 2 nt 8783228-640
8784275 Maize (B73) Public Genome Assembly (AGP_v32)) was modified to contain 641
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
27
an RcaI restriction site at the 3rsquo end of the sequence (Cigan and Unger-Wallace 2013) 642
to accommodate translational fusion to the maize optimized Cas9 to generate 643
MDHCas9 expression cassette The 66 kb HindIII-EcoRI DNA fragment in UBICas9 644
T-DNA vector was replaced with the MDHCas9 DNA contained on a 57 kb HindIII-645
EcoRI DNA fragment to generate the MDHCas9 T-DNA vector These plasmids were 646
introduced into Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 (Komari et al 1996) by electroporation 647
using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad CA USA) as described by Gao (Gao et al 2010) 648
To generate gRNA in the form of RNA molecules the maize-optimized U6 649
polymerase III gRNA expression cassettes were amplified by PCR using a 5rsquo 650
oligonucleotide primer that also contained the sequence of the T7 polymerase promoter 651
and transcriptional initiation signal just 5rsquo of the spacer to gene T7 in vitro transcription 652
was carried out with the AmpliScribetrade T7-Flashtrade kit (Epicentre WI USA) according 653
to the manufacturerrsquos recommendations and products were purified using NucAwaytrade 654
Spin Columns (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc USA) followed by ethanol 655
precipitation 656
The LIG34 and the Ems26 endonucleases vectors were previously described 657
(Gao et al 2010 Djukanovic et al 2013 respectively) Plasmids containing cell 658
division promoting polypeptides ZmODP2 and ZmWus and selectable and visible 659
markers MoPAT-DsRED (a translational fusion of the bialophos resistance gene 660
phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase and the red fluorescent protein DsRED) were 661
previously described in Ananiev et al 2009 662
For ALS2 gene editing single-stranded 127 nt long oligos (sense and antisense 663
strands) homologous to the fragment spanning the ALSCas-4 target site with 4 and 7 664
single nucleotide changes (Fig 2C) were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies 665
IA USA) SNPs within gRNA target site and PAM sequence were introduced to prevent 666
the donor DNA from cleavage by Cas9 protein and SNPs a C to T Oligo1 and a C to T 667
and a G to C replacements downstream from the cleavage site to change proline to 668
serine at position 165 in the ALS2 gene These oligos (sense and antisense strands) 669
were annealed to generate double-stranded DNA digested with BcoDI and ligated to 670
PCR amplified genomic DNA fragments upstream and downstream from the oligo 671
sequence with primers 5rsquo-ACAGCCGCCGCAACCATGGCCA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-672
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
28
ACCATGGGGACGGAATCGAGCA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-673
ATAAGAGTAGTTGTGACCGGGA-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-674
CTGCTCAAGCAACTCAGTCGCAGGG-3rsquo (reverse) respectively also digested with 675
BcoDI to extend the total homology region to 794 bp and cloned into the pUC19 vector 676
Vectors for HDR-mediated targeted genome integration were generated by 677
flanking a UBIMoPAT or UBIMoPAT-DsRED fusion with 1099 bp and 1035 bp maize 678
genomic DNA fragments homologous to the sequences immediately upstream and 679
downstream from the cleavage site of the of LigCas-3 target HR1 and HR2 680
respectively (Fig 4A) Vector containing the MoPAT-DsRED fusion was retrofitted 681
either with UBICas9 and U6gRNA or LIG34 meganuclease expression cassettes 682
(Supplemental Fig S4B) For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector 683
containing expression cassettes shown on Supplemental Figure S4B was moved into 684
the A tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Red 685
CA USA) 686
687
Plant Material 688
Publicly available maize (Zea mays L) hybrid high type II (Hi-II) line (Armstrong 689
and Green 1985) was obtained from internal Pioneer sources 690
To generate plants with either constitutive or regulated expression of Cas9 691
protein constructs described above and shown in Supplemental Figure S2 were used to 692
transform Hi-II maize embryos using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation 693
Regenerated T0 plants were screened by qPCR and DNA blot hybridization analysis for 694
single-copy T-DNA insertions Independent UBICas9 (4) and DHCas9 (11) T-DNA 695
containing plants were identified T0 plants were fertilized with wild-type Hi-II pollen and 696
blue fluorescing embryos were used for further biolistic transformation experiments 697
698
Maize Transformation 699
Biolistic-mediated transformation of maize immature embryos was performed as 700
described in Ananiev et al (Ananiev et al 2009) with slight modification Briefly the 701
DNA was precipitated onto 06 microm (average diameter) gold microprojectiles using a 702
water-soluble cationic lipid TransITreg-2020 (Mirus WI USA) as follows 50 microl of gold 703
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
29
particles (water solution 10 mgml) and 1 microl of TransIT-2020 water solution were added 704
to the premixed DNA constructs (DNA and RNA amounts used in each experiment are 705
shown in Supplemental Table S5) mixed gently and incubated on ice for 10 min DNA-706
coated gold particles were then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 1 minute The pellet was 707
rinsed with 100 microl of absolute alcohol and resuspended by a brief sonication 708
Immediately after sonication DNA-coated gold particles were loaded onto the center of 709
a macrocarrier (10 microl each) and allowed to air dry Immature maize embryos 8-10 days 710
after pollination were bombarded using a PDS-1000He Gun (Bio-Rad CA USA) with a 711
rupture pressure of 425 PSI Post-bombardment culture selection and plant 712
regeneration were performed as previously described (Gordon-Kamm et al 2002) 713
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation followed the detailed protocol previously 714
described in Gao et al 2010 Regenerated plantlets were moved to soil where they 715
were sampled and grown to maturity in greenhouse greenhouse conditions 716
717
PCR qPCR Analysis and Amplicon Sequencing 718
For PCR analysis DNA was extracted from a small amount (05 cm in diameter) 719
of callus tissue or two leaf punches as described in Gao et al 2010 PCR was 720
performed using REDExtract-N-AmpTM PCR ReadyMix (Sigma USA) or Phusionreg High 721
Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) according to the manufacturerrsquos 722
recommendations PCR amplified fragments were cloned using the pCR21-TOPO 723
cloning vector (Life Technologies Inc USA) The primers used in PCR and qPCR 724
reactions are shown in Supplemental Table 3 qPCR analysis was performed as in (Wu 725
et al 2014) As mutations within a population of individual callus sectors may differ 726
from simple (single base pair insertions or deletions) to complex (deletions and 727
additions) sequence modifications target site copy-number as determined by qPCR 728
analysis was used to as a semi-qualitative method to determine mutation frequencies 729
In general mutation frequency was measured based on target site allele copy-number 730
both alleles are defined to be intact if target site copy-number is 2 and the event would 731
be called wild type Events for which qPCR revealed target site copy-number reduced 732
to one would be scored as one mutated allele and one wild type allele Finally if both 733
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
30
alleles of the target site are modified the copy-number is zero and event would be 734
called ldquonullrdquo 735
For deep sequencing analysis 60-90 Hi-II maize immature embryos were co-736
bombarded with the maize optimized Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA expression 737
cassettes or I-CreI modified endonuclease vectors and screenable marker UBIMoPAT-738
DsRED and cell division promoting genes UBIZmODP2 and IN2ZmWUS2 Seven 739
days after bombardment 20-30 of the most uniformly transformed embryos (based on 740
transient expression of DsRED) from each treatment were pooled and total genomic 741
DNA was extracted The DNA region surrounding the intended target site was amplified 742
by PCR using Phusionreg High Fidelity PCR Master Mix (NEB MA USA) adding the 743
amplicon-specific barcodes and Illumina sequencing through two rounds of PCR The 744
primers used in the primary PCR reaction are shown in Supplemental Table 3 and the 745
primers used in the secondary PCR reaction were 5rsquo-746
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACG-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-747
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATA-3rsquo (reverse) The resulting PCR amplifications were 748
purified with a Qiagen PCR purification spin column (Qiagen Germany) concentration 749
measured with a Hoechst dye-based fluorometric assay combined in an equimolar 750
ratio and single read 100 nucleotide-length amplicon sequencing was performed on 751
Illuminarsquos MiSeq Personal Sequencer with a 30-40 (vv) spike of PhiX control v3 752
(Illumina FC-110-3001) to off-set sequence bias Only those reads with a ge1 nucleotide 753
INDEL arising within the 10 nt window centered over the expected site of cleavage and 754
not found in the negative controls were classified as NHEJ mutations NHEJ mutant 755
reads with the same mutation were counted and collapsed into a single read and the top 756
10 most prevalent mutations were visually confirmed as arising within the expected site 757
of cleavage The total numbers of visually confirmed mutations were then used to 758
calculate the percentage of mutant reads based on the total number of reads of an 759
appropriate length containing a perfect match to the barcode and forward primer 760
761
DNA Isolation and Blot Hybridization Analysis 762
For DNA isolation and blot hybridization analyses maize leaf tissue (approximately 25 763
g fresh weight) from transformed and control plants was freeze-dried and ground Total 764
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
31
genomic DNA was extracted as described in Cigan et al 2001 Five micrograms of 765
DNA from each sample were digested overnight with HindIII and the DNA fragments 766
were separated on a 08 agarose gel run at 23 V overnight DNA was transferred to a 767
nylon membrane (Roche Germany) using standard protocol (Sambrook et al 1989) 768
and fixed to the membrane by UVirradiation of 150 mJ in a Gene Linker (Bio-Rad CA 769
USA) Membranes were pre-hybridized for 1 hour in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Germany) 770
at 50degC Hybridization probes LIG-5rsquo (459 bp) LIG-3rsquo (456 bp) and Mo-PAT (446 bp) 771
were labeled by PCR with primers 5rsquo-AGCTTTATCCATCCATCCATCGC-3rsquo (forward) 772
and 5rsquo-AATTCTCGTACGTACAGCACGCG-3rsquo (reverse) 5rsquo-773
ACCCCTACAGCCACTTAGTCTCCG-3rsquo (forward) and 774
GCCAGAGAGATCGAGATCGATGGA-3rsquo (reverse) and 5rsquo-775
GTGTGCGACATCGTGAACCACT-3rsquo (forward) and 5rsquo-TCGAAGTCGCGCTGCCAGAA-776
3rsquo (reverse) respectively using the DIG Probe PCR Synthesis Kit (Roche Germany) 777
according to manufacturerrsquos recommendations Hybridization was performed overnight 778
at 50degC Membranes were washed twice in 2times SSC01 SDS at room temperature 779
followed by three washes in 01times SSC01 SDS for HR probe or 005times SSC005 780
SDS for Mo-PAT probe at 63degC Membranes were prepared for detection by washing 781
at room temperature in 1times Wash Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 10 782
minutes then 1times Blocking Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 60 minutes 783
followed by 1times Antibody solution (Anti-Digoxigenin-AP Fab Fragments (Roche 784
Germany) in 1times Blocking Buffer) for 60 minutes and finally three times in 1times Wash 785
Buffer for 8 minutes per wash Detection was done by placing membranes in 1times 786
Detection Buffer (DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set) for 5 minutes removing to a clean 787
tray and pipetting CDP-Star ready-to-use (Roche Germany) onto the membranes then 788
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak USA) 789
790
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 791
Authors are thankful to Brian Lenderts Meizhu Yang Shan Zhao Wally Marsh 792
Susan Wagner and Min Zeng for technical and maize transformation support DuPont 793
Pioneer Controlled Environment group for managing plants and Genomics group for 794
DNA sequencing The authors extend special thanks to Brooke Peterson-Burch for 795
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
32
bioinformatics support Wayne Crismani Jeff Sander Doane Chilcoat Philippe Horvath 796
and the anonymous Plant Physiology reviewers for thoughtful comments and 797
suggestions 798
799
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
33
800
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 801 Table S1 Maize genomic sites targeted by Cas9-gRNA system 802
Table S2 T0 plant analysis by qPCR for mutations at maize target loci of 30 T0 plants 803 produced in the multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 804
Table S3 List of primers used in the study 805
Table S4 Edited ALS2 events recovered using different templates and selection 806
Table S5 DNA and RNA amounts used in bombardment experiments (single shot) 807
Figure S1 Ten of the most prevalent mutations generated by either the Cas9-gRNA 808 system or the LIG34 homing endonuclease identified by deep sequencing of the PCR 809 amplicons across the corresponding target site 810
Figure S2 Agro vector for stable integration of the ZmUBICas9 into the maize 811
genome 812
Figure S3 Repair of the RF-FP gene via intramolecular homologous recombination 813
Figure S4 Constructs used for HDR-mediated targeted gene insertion at the liguleless-814
1 region using Cas-gRNA system and LIG34 meganuclease 815
Nucleotide sequence of maize optimized Cas9 816
Nucleotide sequence of LIG-CR3 gRNA expression cassette 817
Nucleotide sequence and description of the donor DNA in the integration 818
experiment 819
Nucleotide sequence and description of the RF-FP repair cassette 820
821
822
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
34
823
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
35
824
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
36
Table 1 Percentage of mutant reads at 5 different target sites 7 days post-825
transformation 826
Target DSB Reagents Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIG (Chr 2)
LIG34 meganuclease 616536 1211 020
LIG-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 716854 33050 461
LIG-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 711047 16675 235
LIG-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 713183 27959 392
MS26 (Chr 1)
Ems26 meganuclease 512784 642 013
MS26-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 575671 10073 175
MS26-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 543856 16930 311
MS26-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 538141 13879 258
MS45 (Chr 9)
MS45-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 812644 3795 047
MS45-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 785183 14704 187
MS45-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 728023 9203 126
ALS1 (Chr 4) and ALS2
(Chr 5)
ALS-CR1 gRNA+Cas9 434452 9669 223
ALS-CR2 gRNA+Cas9 472351 6352 135
ALS-CR3 gRNA+Cas9 497786 8535 172
Controls Cas9 only 640063 1 000
LIG-CR1 gRNA only 646774 1 000
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
37
Table 2 Read counts and percentage of mutant reads at maize target sites in 827
multiplexed Cas9-gRNA experiments 7 days post-transformation 828
829
830
Target Site Co-Transformed gRNAs Total Number
of Reads
Number of Mutant Target Gene
Reads
Percentage of Mutant Reads in
Target Gene
LIGCas-3
LIGCas-3 645107 12631 196
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 579992 10348 178
LIGCas-3 MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 648901 12094 186
MS26Cas-2
MS26 Cas 2 699154 17247 247
MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 717158 10256 143
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 613431 9931 162
MS26Cas-2 MS45Cas-2 LIGCas-3 471890 7311 155
MS45Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 503423 10034 199
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 480178 8008 167
MS45Cas-2 MS26Cas-2 LIGCas-3 416711 7190 173
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
38
831
Table 3 Mutation analysis at maize target sites in multiplexed experiments 832
Target Sites
T0 Plant
qPCR Results
LIG34 TS MS26 TS MS45 TS Stable
Integration
Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Cas9 gRNA
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas2
1 nullnull 1bp del 2bp del+
1 bp ins
1bp ins
(A) 19bp del - - Yes Yes
2 nullnull 1bp ins
(T) 1bp del
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G) - - Yes Yes
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2 3 hetnull - -
1bp ins
(C) WT 2bp del 65bp del Yes No
LIGCas-3
MS26Cas-2
MS45Cas-2
4 nullnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
large
mut
1bp ins
(T) 1 bp del 15bp del
large
mut Yes Yes
5 hetnullnull 1bp ins
(T)
Wild-
type
1bp ins
(A)
1bp ins
(G)
1bp ins
(T)
large
mut No No
833 Null indicates that both alleles are mutated het indicates that one alleles is mutated and the other one is 834 wild-type 835 Due to the size and nature of the mutation (likely the transformation vector insertion) it could not be 836 resolved by the methods used in the analysis 837
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
39
Table 4 Percentage of mutant reads at maize LIG and MS26 target sites produced in 838
transient gRNA delivery into wild-type embryos and embryos with pre-integrated Cas9 839
under constitutive (UBI) or regulated (MDH) promoters 840
841
Target Site
Hi-II Embryos Transformation
Percentage of Mutant Reads
2 days post-transformation
7 days post-transformation
LIG
Wild-type Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (DNA) - 260
Cas9 (DNA) + gRNA (RNA) - 002
UBICas9 gRNA (DNA) 122
gRNA (RNA) 186
MDHCas9 event 1
gRNA (DNA) 025 -
gRNA (RNA) 012 -
MDHCas9 event 2
gRNA (DNA) 057 -
gRNA (RNA) 026 -
MDHCas9 event 3
gRNA (DNA) 046 -
gRNA (RNA) 035 -
MS26 MDHCas9
event 2
gRNA (DNA) 058 -
gRNA (RNA) 017 -
842 In these experiments analysis was performed on embryos collected 7 days after transformation while in 843 the experiments with pre-integrated Cas9 analysis was done on embryos collected 2 days after 844 transformation The additional 5 days allows constitutively expressed Cas9 endonuclease to continue 845 DNA cleavage thus accounting for the difference in percentage of mutant reads in the DNA delivery 846 experiments 847
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Cas9-gRNA directed genome editing in maize
40
Table 5 Summary of gene integration at LIG target site 848
849
System Experiment Number of
Events Analyzed
Mutation Frequency LIG
target site
2 Junction PCR Positive Events
LIG34 Meganuclease + donor DNA
Separate vectors
Particle bombardment
288 6 2 (07)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
3 separate vectors
Particle bombardment
480 83 11 (25)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
All in a single vector
Particle bombardment
336 86 14 (41)
LIG-CR3 gRNA + Cas9 + donor DNA
Agrobacterium-mediated delivery 192 84 0
850
851
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Parsed CitationsAinley WM Sastry-Dent L Welter ME Murray MG Zeitler B Amora R Corbin DR Miles RR Arnold NL Strange TL Simpson MACao Z Carroll C Pawelczak KS Blue R West K Rowland LM Perkins D Samuel P Dewes CM Shen L Sriram S Evans SL RebarEJ Zhang L Gregory PD Urnov FD Webb SR Petolino JF (2013) Trait stacking via targeted genome editing Plant BiotechnologyJournal 11 1126-1134
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An G Mitra A Choi HK Costa MA An K Thornburg RW Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3 control region of the potatowound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene Plant Cell 1 115-122
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ananiev E Wu C Chamberlin M Svitashev S Schwartz C Gordon-Kamm W Tingey S (2009) Artificial chromosome formation inmaize (Zea mays L) Chromosoma 118 157-177
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Armstrong CL Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline Planta 164 207-214
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Arnould S Chames P Perez C Lacroix E Duclert A Epinat J-C Stricher F Petit A-S Patin A Guillier S Rolland S Prieto J BlancoFJ Bravo J Montoya G Serrano L Duchateau P Pacircques F (2006) Engineering of Large Numbers of Highly Specific HomingEndonucleases that Induce Recombination on Novel DNA Targets Journal of Molecular Biology 355 443-458
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Barrangou R Fremaux C Deveau H Richards M Boyaval P Moineau S Romero DA Horvath P (2007) CRISPR Provides AcquiredResistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes Science 315 1709-1712
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Boch J Scholze H Schornack S Landgraf A Hahn S Kay S Lahaye T Nickstadt A Bonas U (2009) Breaking the Code of DNABinding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors Science 326 1509-1512
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Brooks C Nekrasov V Lippman Z Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the CRISPRCas9system Plant Physiol 166 1292-1297
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Burr B Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize theoretical and practical considerations Trends inGenetics 7 55-60
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cai C Doyon Y Ainley W Miller J DeKelver R Moehle E Rock J Lee Y-L Garrison R Schulenberg L Blue R Worden A Baker LFaraji F Zhang L Holmes M Rebar E Collingwood T Rubin-Wilson B Gregory P Urnov F Petolino J (2009) Targeted transgeneintegration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases Plant Molecular Biology 69 699-709
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cho SW Kim S Kim Y Kweon J Kim HS Bae S Kim J-S (2014) Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPRCas-derived RNA-guidedendonucleases and nickases Genome Research 24 132-141
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Choulika A Perrin A Dujon B Nicolas J (1995) Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Cell Biol 15 1968-1973
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Christensen AH Sharrock RA Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes structure thermal perturbation of expression andhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
transcript splicing and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation Plant Mol Biol 18 675-689Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger-Wallace E inventors Nov 21 2013 Inducible promoter sequences for regulated expression and methods of useUS Patent Application No 20130312137 A1
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cigan AM Unger E Xu R-J Kendall TL Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 mutant maize requires tapetalexpression of the Ms45 gene Sex Plant Reprod 14 135-142
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cong L Ran FA Cox D Lin S Barretto R Habib N Hsu PD Wu X Jiang W Marraffini LA Zhang F (2013) Multiplex GenomeEngineering Using CRISPRCas Systems Science 339 819-823
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cornu TI Thibodeau-Beganny S Guhl E Alwin S Eichtinger M Joung JK Cathomen T (2007) DNA-binding Specificity Is a MajorDeterminant of the Activity and Toxicity of Zinc-finger Nucleases Mol Ther 16 352-358
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DHalluin K Vanderstraeten C Van Hulle J Rosolowska J Van Den Brande I Pennewaert A DHont K Bossut M Jantz D RuiterR Broadhvest J (2013) Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction PlantBiotechnol J 11 933-941
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Djukanovic V Smith J Lowe K Yang M Gao H Jones S Nicholson MG West A Lape J Bidney D Falco CS Jantz D Lyznik LA(2013) Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designedI-CreI homing endonuclease The Plant Journal 76 888-899
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Doudna JA Charpentier E (2014) The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Science 346 1258096Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fauser F Schiml S Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPRCas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genomeengineering in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 79 348-359
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Mao Y Xu N Zhang B Wei P Yang D-L Wang Z Zhang Z Zheng R Yang L Zeng L Liu X Zhu J-K (2014) Multigenerationanalysis reveals the inheritance specificity and patterns of CRISPRCas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences 111 4632-4637
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Feng Z Zhang B Ding W Liu X Yang D-L Wei P Cao F Zhu S Zhang F Mao Y Zhu J-K (2013) Efficient genome editing in plantsusing a CRISPRCas system Cell Res 23 1229-1232
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao H Smith J Yang M Jones S Djukanovic V Nicholson MG West A Bidney D Falco SC Jantz D Lyznik LA (2010) Heritabletargeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease The Plant Journal 61 176-187
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao J Wang G Ma S Xie X Wu X Zhang X Wu Y Zhao P Xia Q (2015) CRISPRCas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotianatabacum Plant Molecular Biology 87 99-110
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gasiunas G Barrangou R Horvath P Siksnys V (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage forhttpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
adaptive immunity in bacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 E2579-E2586Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gordon-Kamm W Dilkes BP Lowe K Hoerster G Sun X Ross M Church L Bunde C Farrell J Hill P Maddock S Snyder J SykesL Li Z Woo Y-m Bidney D Larkins BA (2002) Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plantretinoblastoma pathway Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 11975-11980
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Halfter U Morris PC Willmitzer L (1992) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana Molecular and General Genetics MGG 231 186-193
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hanin M Volrath S Bogucki A Briker M Ward E Paszkowski J (2001) Gene targeting in Arabidopsis The Plant Journal 28 671-677Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Haughn G Smith J Mazur B Somerville C (1988) Transformation with a mutant Arabidopsis acetolactate synthase gene renderstobacco resistant to sulfonylurea herbicides Molecular and General Genetics MGG 211 266-271
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hsu Patrick D Lander Eric S Zhang F (2014) Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering Cell 1571262-1278
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ishida Y Saito H Ohta S Hiei Y Komari T Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L) mediated byAgrobacterium tumefaciens Nat Biotechnol 14 745-750
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jacobs TB LaFayette PR Schmitz RJ Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPRCas9 BMCbiotechnology 15 16
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jasin M Rothstein R (2013) Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5 a012740
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiang W Yang B Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPRCas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance ofModified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations PLoS One 9 e99225
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jinek M Chylinski K Fonfara I Hauer M Doudna JA Charpentier E (2012) A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonucleasein Adaptive Bacterial Immunity Science 337 816-821
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kempin SA Liljegren SJ Block LM Rounsley SD Yanofsky MF Lam E (1997) Targeted disruption in Arabidopsis Nature 389 802-803
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim S Kim D Cho SW Kim J Kim J-S (2014) Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purifiedCas9 ribonucleoproteins Genome Research 24 1012-1019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Komari T Hiei Y Saito Y Murai N Kumashiro T (1996) Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higherplants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers The Plant Journal10 165-174
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar V Jain M (2015) The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing advances and opportunities Journal of ExperimentalBotany 66 47-57
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee KY Townsend J Tepperman J Black M Chui CF Mazur B Dunsmuir P Bedbrook J (1988) The molecular basis ofsulfonylurea herbicide resistance in tobacco The EMBO Journal 7 1241-1248
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li J-F Norville JE Aach J McCormack M Zhang D Bush J Church GM Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9 Nat Biotech 31 688-691
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang Z Zhang K Chen K Gao C (2014) Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPRCas System Journal ofGenetics and Genomics 41 63-68
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin S Staahl BT Alla RK Doudna JA (2014) Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing ofCRISPRCas9 delivery Elife 3 e04766
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeder ML Thibodeau-Beganny S Osiak A Wright DA Anthony RM Eichtinger M Jiang T Foley JE Winfrey RJ Townsend JAUnger-Wallace E Sander JD Muumlller-Lerch F Fu F Pearlberg J Goumlbel C Dassie Justin P Pruett-Miller SM Porteus MH Sgroi DCIafrate AJ Dobbs D McCray Jr PB Cathomen T Voytas DF Joung JK (2008) Rapid Open-Source Engineering of CustomizedZinc-Finger Nucleases for Highly Efficient Gene Modification Molecular Cell 31 294-301
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova K Aravind L Wolf Y Koonin E (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin andevolution of CRISPR-Cas systems Biology Direct 6 38
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Makarova KS Haft DH Barrangou R Brouns SJJ Charpentier E Horvath P Moineau S Mojica FJM Wolf YI Yakunin AF van derOost J Koonin EV (2011) Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems Nat Rev Micro 9 467-477
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mali P Yang L Esvelt KM Aach J Guell M DiCarlo JE Norville JE Church GM (2013) RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineeringvia Cas9 Science 339 823-826
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miao Z-H Lam E (1995) Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana The Plant Journal 7 359-365Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moore JK Haber JE (1996) Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Molecular and Cellular Biology 16 2164-2173
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Offringa R Franke-van Dijk ME De Groot MJ van den Elzen PJ Hooykaas PJ (1993) Nonreciprocal homologous recombinationbetween Agrobacterium transferred DNA and a plant chromosomal locus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 907346-7350
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1993) Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strandbreaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease Nucleic Acids Research 21 5034-5040
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Dujon B Hohn B (1996) Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 5055-5060
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Puchta H Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants prospects for a bright future The Plant Journal78 727-741
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Roth DB Wilson JH (1986) Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells role for short sequence homologies in the joiningreaction Molecular and Cellular Biology 6 4295-4304
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sabelli PA Hoerster G Lizarraga LE Brown SW Gordon-Kamm WJ Larkins BA (2009) Positive regulation of minichromosomemaintenance gene expression DNA replication and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma gene Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 106 4042-4047
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring HarborLaboratory
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shan Q Wang Y Li J Zhang Y Chen K Liang Z Zhang K Liu J Xi JJ Qiu J-L Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of cropplants using a CRISPR-Cas system Nat Biotech 31 686-688
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shukla VK Doyon Y Miller JC DeKelver RC Moehle EA Worden SE Mitchell JC Arnold NL Gopalan S Meng X Choi VM RockJM Wu Y-Y Katibah GE Zhifang G McCaskill D Simpson MA Blakeslee B Greenwalt SA Butler HJ Hinkley SJ Zhang L RebarEJ Gregory PD Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases Nature459 437-441
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smih F Rouet P Romanienko PJ Jasin M (1995) Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonicstem cells Nucleic Acids Research 23 5012-5019
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Bibikova M Whitby FG Reddy AR Chandrasegaran S Carroll D (2000) Requirements for double-strand cleavage bychimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains Nucleic Acids Research 28 3361-3369
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Smith J Grizot S Arnould S Duclert A Epinat J-C Chames P Prieto J Redondo P Blanco FJ Bravo J Montoya G Pacircques FDuchateau P (2006) A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences Nucleic AcidsResearch 34 e149-e149
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Szczepek M Brondani V Buchel J Serrano L Segal DJ Cathomen T (2007) Structure-based redesign of the dimerizationinterface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Nat Biotech 25 786-793
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terada R Johzuka-Hisatomi Y Saitoh M Asao H Iida S (2007) Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination as aBiotechnological Tool for Rice Functional Genomics Plant Physiol 144 846-856
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-
Terada R Urawa H Inagaki Y Tsugane K Iida S (2002) Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rice 20 1030-1034Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Townsend JA Wright DA Winfrey RJ Fu F Maeder ML Joung JK Voytas DF (2009) High-frequency modification of plant genesusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases Nature 459 442-445
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Voytas DF Gao C (2014) Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges PLoS Biol 12e1001877
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walter KL Strachan SD Ferry NM Albert HH Castle LA Sebastian SA (2014) Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean Pest Management Science 70 1831-1839
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang Y Cheng X Shan Q Zhang Y Liu J Gao C Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew Nat Biotech 32 947-951
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weber E Gruetzner R Werner S Engler C Marillonnet S (2011) Assembly of Designer TAL Effectors by Golden Gate CloningPLoS One 6 e19722
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu E Lenderts B Glassman K Berezowska-Kaniewska M Christensen H Asmus T Zhen S Chu U Cho M-J Zhao Z-Y (2014)Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants In VitroCellular amp Developmental Biology - Plant 50 9-18
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yu Q Powles SB (2014) Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides current understanding Pest Management Science 70 1340-1350Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H Zhang J Wei P Zhang B Gou F Feng Z Mao Y Yang L Zhang H Xu N Zhu J-K (2014) The CRISPRCas9 systemproduces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 797-807
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y Zhang F Li X Baller JA Qi Y Starker CG Bogdanove AJ Voytas DF (2013) Transcription Activator-Like EffectorNucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering Plant Physiology 161 20-27
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou H Liu B Weeks DP Spalding MH Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes inducedby CRISPRCas9 in rice Nucleic Acids Research 42 10903-10914
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuris JA Thompson DB Shu Y Guilinger JP Bessen JL Hu JH Maeder ML Joung JK Chen Z-Y Liu DR (2015) Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo Nat Biotech 33 73-80
Pubmed Author and TitleCrossRef Author and TitleGoogle Scholar Author Only Title Only Author and Title
httpsplantphysiolorgDownloaded on November 7 2020 - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists All rights reserved
- Parsed Citations
- Reviewer PDF
- Parsed Citations
-