please mute your microphone welcome to cesa 10. 2 understanding the new school report card
TRANSCRIPT
Please mute your microphone
Welcome to CESA 10
2
Understanding the New School Report Card
Agenda Overview
Connection To the Bigger Picture: Agenda 2017
Report Card 101-The Basics Digging In Available Resources Next Steps
Wisconsin’s Changing DirectionAgenda 2017
Standards & Instruction What and how should kids learn?
Assessments and Data Systems How do we know if they have
learned it?
School and Educator Effectiveness How do we ensure that students
have highly effective teachers and schools?
School Finance Reform How should we pay for schools?
Standards & Instruction
GOAL: All students career and college ready.
Increase graduation rate from 85.7% to 92% Increase career and college ready from 32% to
67% Close gaps by 50% Increase the percentage of students scoring
proficient in 3rd grade reading and 8th grade math.
http://dpi.wi.gov/sprntdnt/everychild.html
Assessments & Data Systems
New Accountability System Bridge to the new assessments….changed
cutoff scores Adequate Yearly Progress, AYP, is gone School Report Cards Fall, 2012 Next Year, District Report
Cards
New Accountability System
Multiple Measures Two Versions of the Report Card
School Report Card School Report Card Detail
Resources Interpretive Guide Technical Guide
Report Card 101
Report card data should not be shared with the public until October 8th
Public Release-PDFs posted to DPI webpage
PreliminaryFinal-late October/November
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
12
3
4 5
Accountability Score
4 Priority Areas – Engagement Indicators = SCORE
Priority Area 1: Student Achievement-NAEPized Cut Scores
WKCE Reading Scale Score by GradePerformance
Level 3 4 5 6 7 8 10Advanced
507 536 546 573 590 613 644Proficient
475 498 503 525 535 548 566Basic
445 462 464 479 486 493 496Minimal
Performance270 280 290 300 310 330 350
READING Minimal Performance Basic Proficient Advanced
Third Grade 270-393 394-429 430-465 466-640
Fourth Grade 280-395 396-439 440-488 489-650
Fifth Grade 290-400 401-443 444-496 497-690
Sixth Grade 300-417 418-456 457-513 514-730
Seventh Grade 310-433 434-466 467-522 523-780
Eighth Grade 330-444 445-479 480-538 539-790
Tenth Grade 350-455 456-502 503-554 555-820
New
Old
Priority Area 1:Student Achievement
0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Year 2Year 1 Year 3
Score for ReadingScore for Math
ProficientBasicMinimal Advanced
Priority Area 1:Student Achievement
Page 4 & 5: Report Card Detail Points displayed in the tables are weighted
so that higher performance levels, larger numbers of students, and more recent years contribute more to the score for the priority area.
Retroactively adjusted to align with NAEP To protect privacy, data for fewer than 20
students will be replaced with an * on the public report cards
NA used when data is Not Applicable…graduation data on an elementary report card
Priority Area 1:Student Achievement
Page 4 & 5: Report Card Detail What observations can you make about
your school’s data? Do you see any trends that are of
concern? What might you hypothesize about your
observations? How might you use this data?
Priority Area 2: Student Growth
Like pediatric growth percentiles Doctor takes a series of basic measurements. Those measurements are compared to children of
the same age and gender. A child’s measurement places him/her in a growth
percentile. Example: A 6-month-old boy who is 25.5” long falls
into the 75th percentile. He is as long or longer than 75 percent of boys his
age.
Priority Area 2: Student Growth What is being measured?
Rewards progress towards higher performance levels
Deducts points for students regressing below proficient
Rewards schools showing rapid upward movement and having many students who are progressing. Also, rewards schools that are already doing well and maintaining their high performance
Priority Area 2: Student Growth
Priority Area 2: Student Growth
o Points for meeting growth trajectory o Points off for meeting declining trajectory
Priority Area 2:Student Growth
1 pt
1 pt
1 pt
PriorYear
CurrentYear
ReadingScore
MathScore
GrowthScore
+ =
Priority Area 2:Student Growth
Page 6-8: Report Card Detail What observations can you make about
your school’s data? Do you see any trends that are of
concern? What might you hypothesize about your
observations? How might you use this data?
Priority Area 3: Closing Gaps
Provides a measure that corresponds to the statewide goal of having all students improve while narrowing the achievement and graduation gaps that separate different groups of students. Students With Disabilities English Language Learners Low Income Racial/Ethnic Groups
Priority Area 3: Closing Gaps
School Groups Comparison Groups
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Super Group
Racial Ethnic
Priority Area 3: Closing Gaps
Two Components1. Graduation OR Attendance Gaps2. Achievement Gaps
Change in performance from the previous year to the current year is measured for each target group. If the performance of a comparison group declined, the amount of change credited to the associated target groups is reduced.
Priority Area 3: Closing Gaps
Pages 9-11: Report Card Detail What observations can you make about
your school’s data? Do you see any trends that are of
concern? What might you hypothesize about your
observations? How might you use this data?
Priority Area 4: On-Track and Postsecondary
Readiness Component 11. Graduation rate for high schools OR2. Attendance rate for elementary/middle
schools Component 2
1. 3rd grade reading OR2. 8th grade math OR3. ACT participation and performance
Priority Area 4: On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
Graduation Rate = the average of a school’s four-year and six-year cohort graduation rates
Attendance Rate = the number of days of student attendance / total possible days of attendance
Priority Area 4: On-Track and Postsecondary
Readiness 3rd grade reading OR 8th grade math…same format as student achievement
ACT Participation and Performance The percentage of 12th graders tested
divided by the number enrolled The performance
Reading 21 or higher English 18 or higher Math 22 or higher Science 24 or higher
Priority Area 4: On-Track and Postsecondary
Readiness Pages 12-14: Report Card Detail What observations can you make about
your school’s data? Do you see any trends that are of
concern? What might you hypothesize about your
observations? How might you use this data?
How Priority Area Scores Contribute to the Base Accountability Score
Student Engagement Indicators
Three Performance Areas1. Test Participation
Less than 85% (-10) 85-94.9% (-5)
2. Absenteeism of no more than 13% (-5)3. Dropout Rate of no more than 6% (-5)
Schools that fail to meet these goals will receive fixed deductions from the base accountability score they earned across the 4 Priority Areas
Student Engagement Indicators
Page 15: Report Card Detail
What observations can you make about your school’s data?
Do you see any areas of concern? How might you use this data?
The Final Accountability Determination
Accountability Rating Category Level of SupportAccountability Score Range
Minimum Maximum
Significantly Exceeds Expectations Rewards and Replication 83 100
Exceeds Expectations Rewards and Replication 73 82.9
Meets Expectations Local Improvement Efforts 63 72.9
Meets Few Expectations State Interventions 53 62.9
Fails to Meet Expectations State Interventions 0 52.9
Supplementary Report Card Data
Supplementary Report Card Data
In the technical report card, Annual Measurable Objectives for NCLB purposes. All students and each subgroup expected to reach the 90th percentile within 6 years, making a minimum improvement of 1% each year.
By 2016-17, all student groups should reach 50% reading proficiency and 65% math proficiency.
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
Refer to: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/amo.html
Supplementary Report Card Data
Pages 16-18: Report Card Detail What observations can you make about
your school’s data? Do you see any trends that are of
concern? What might you hypothesize about your
observations? How might you use this data?
Review Period
Schools will have 30 days following release of the Secure Preliminary Report Cards to contact the DPI if they have identified a potential data issue.
Available Resources
Accountability Reform Page Interpretive Guide (9/21/12) Technical Guide (9/21/12) Parent Guide (9/21/12) Informational Update on School Report Cards (9/17/12) e-Learning Module: A Guide to Wisconsin’s School Repor
t Card (9/24/12)
e-Learning Module: A Guide to Wisconsin’s School Report Card(Ipad Version) (9/24/12)
Report Card Release Information (9/24/12) Report Card Review Period Inquiry Form (9/24/12)
http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/acct/accountability.html
Available Resources
Every Child a Graduate
Standards and Instruction: What and how should kids learn?
Assessments and Data Systems: How do we know if they learned it?
School and Educator Effectiveness: How do we ensure kids have highly effective teachers and schools?
School Finance Reform: How should we pay for schools? Overview PDF. More Communication Resources.
http://dpi.wi.gov/sprntdnt/everychild.html
Digging In
Review your school report card(s)
Explain each section What questions do you have? How might this data be used?
Next Step:Local Communication Plan
Who are your key stakeholders? What will you communicate to
each group? Consistent but customized
message How will you communicate?
Multiple means, multiple times What is your timeline?
Connecting the Dots
Higher Expectations for Learning Common Core Standards Smarter Balanced Assessment Response to Intervention
Higher Expectations for Educators Educator Effectiveness
GOAL: ALL students college and career ready
