pm monitoring
DESCRIPTION
PM Monitoring. Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe. Overview of PM session:. Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting QC (routine checks, audits, and method-specific QC) for: Filter and Continuous PM2.5 Filter and Continuous PM10 Minivols - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PM Monitoring
1
Guest Speaker:Brandy Toft
Leech Lake Ojibwe
![Page 2: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting
QC (routine checks, audits, and method-specific QC) for: ◦ Filter and Continuous PM2.5◦ Filter and Continuous PM10
Minivols General PM QC issues
Overview of PM session:
2
![Page 3: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FRM=Federal Reference MethodFEM = Federal Equivalent Methodnew list available as of 2/1: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/criteria/reference-equivalent-methods-list.pdf
3
![Page 4: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
For NAAQS If comparing to standard, MUST use FRM or
FEM; see 40 CFR 50.7◦ Also look at Appendix C to 40 CFR Part 58 –
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology
You may have purposes other than comparing to NAAQS, and you may want different types of instruments to suit your goals
Can use an FRM (class 1, filter-based), FEM class II (filter-based, like dichots), or FEM class III (continuous), or ARM (someday)
4
![Page 5: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
§50.7 NAAQS for Particulate Matter 2.5 Microns and Smaller 6 PM2.5 continuous methods have been
approved as FEMs PM2.5 Continuous Monitoring
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/contmont.html If PM2.5 continuous FEMs meet Part 53 criteria
used to approve the instrument by comparing to collocated FRMs, EPA supports use of the continuous FEM as a Primary monitor (see spreadsheet for the calcs at above website)
5
![Page 6: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Approved PM2.5 Class III FEMs
Met One BAM-1020 Monitor – EQPM-0308-170 Thermo Scientific Model 5014i or FH62C14-
DHS – EQPM-0609-183 Thermo Scientific Model 5030 SHARP – EQPM-
0609-184 Thermo Scientific Series 8500C FDMS – EQPM-
0609-181 Thermo Scientific 1405-DF FDMS – EQPM-0609-
182 GRIMM Model EDM 180 PM2.5 Monitor – EQPM-
0311-195
![Page 7: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Summary of Operating PM2.5 FEMs:
Method DescriptionMethod
Code
Monitors Reporting
to AQS – Nov. ‘10
Met One BAM-1020 170 67Thermo 8500C FDMS 181 24Thermo 1405-DF FDMS 182 1Thermo 5014i or FH62C14-DHS 183 0
Thermo 5030 SHARP 184 2GRIMM EDM 180 195 0
![Page 8: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ARM = Approved Regional Method No ARMs yet Process of establishing an ARM is the same
as an FEM, must collocate FRM and produce 90 + sample pairs per year with 20 ea season
Regional office must approve (natch)
ARMs ?
8
![Page 9: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
An approved FEM can be designated as primary
The FEM can be collocated with FRM, the FRM being primary
An ARM FEM can be approved (takes at least a year of operation to gather enough data, plus time for approval)
Approved primary FEM or ARM would then report to AQS as 88101, POC 3
3 scenarios for PM2.5 continuous for NAAQS:
9
![Page 10: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PM 2.5 QC Overview:Method CFR Frequency MQO
Flow Rate Verification (QC check)
3.2.3* Once every 4 weeks
<= 4% of Standard & 5% of Design Value
Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audit
3.2.4 Every 6 Months
<= 4% of Standard & 5% of Design Value
Collocated Sampling 3.2.5 15% of Network Every 12 Days
PM2.5, TSP, PM10 :Precision = 10%
PM2.5 PEP Program 3.2.7 Each quarter-(see QA Requirements for NAAQS.xls)
Bias = 10%
10
• See e-cfr, or: http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl
![Page 11: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Who can do these, and with what?Method AQS Who? With What?
Flow Rate Verification (not required to be reported to AQS)
RP Can be site operator, no national certification required, not the same standards that are used to calibrate your analyzer
Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audit
RA Preferably not site operator, no national certification required, not the same standards that are used for monthly QC checks
PM PEP RP, and contractor reports their values
OAQPS/TAMS certified auditor
OAQPS/TAMS equipment
11
General info on filter methods in guidance doc 2.12: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/qa/m212covd.pdf
![Page 12: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Same CFR requirements for filter (FRM-17 methods) and dichot (2 methods) and continuous (6 methods), although there are separate validation templates for filter, continuous & dichot
collocation: ◦ if <= 3 sites, at least 1 FRM collocated with one FEM◦ 1/12 days for SLAMS, 1/6 for PSD
PEP five times each year if fewer than 5 sites FR checks every 4 weeks(RP) with own stnd FR audit every 6 months(RA) with outside stnd
PM2.5:
12
![Page 13: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
§50.7 NAAQS for Particulate Matter 10 Microns and Smaller
FRM are all filter-based methods (40 CFR 50 App. J)
FEM includes continuous methods (40 CFR 53)
BOTH can be compared to the NAAQS for PM10 (40 CFR 50.7)
13
![Page 14: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PM10 FRM: 2 Methods Hi-vol (1130 lpm) method (used for TSP)
with PM10 inlet that directs only PM10 to filter; guidance in EPA Handbook 2.11
Lo-vol sampling at 16.7 L/m; see EPA Handbook 2.10; can be either:◦ Dichot method which split into PM2.5 and PM10;
both filters are weighed◦ Lo-vol sampler (R&P, Andersen, and BGI all
approved as FRM PM10)
14
Both handbooks at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qapollutant.html
![Page 15: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
TEOMs BAMs
PM10 FEM: 2 Methods
15
![Page 16: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PM 10 manual QC:Method CFR Frequency MQO
Flow Rate Verification (QC check) LOW-VOL, 16.7 LPM
3.3.2 Once every 4 weeks
<= 4% of Standard & 5% of Design Value
Flow Rate Verification (QC check) HI-VOL, 1130 LPM
3.3.2 Once every quarter
<= 7% of Standard & 10% of Design Value
Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audit LOW-VOL
3.3.3 Every 6 Months
<= 4% of Standard & 5% of Design Value
Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audit HI-VOL
3.3.3 Every 6 Months
<= 10% of Standard & 10% of Design Value
Collocated Sampling
3.3.1 15% of Network Every 12 Days
Precision = 10%
16
(hi-vol or lo-vol doesn’t matter to the 15%)
![Page 17: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
PM 10 automated QC:Method CFR Frequency MQO
Flow Rate Verification (QC check)
3.2.3 Once every 4 weeks
<= 7% of Standard & 10% of design
Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audit
3.2.4 Every 6 Months
<= 10% of Standard & design
Average Flow Rate
Not in CFR, just in
validation template so
is recommendation
Every 24 hours
Average within 5% of design
17
Plus whatever your instrument manuals call for.
![Page 18: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Who can do these, and with what?Method AQS Frequency Who? With What?
Flow Rate Verification (not required to be reported to AQS)
RP Once every 4 weeks
Can be site operator, no national certification required, not the same standards that are used to calibrate your analyzer
Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audit
RA Every 6 Months
Preferably not site operator, no national certification required, not the same standards that are used for monthly QC checks
18
![Page 19: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
As for all PM, it all hinges on flow rate and careful filter handling
Minivols:
19
![Page 20: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Laboratories!◦ The TAMS Center laboratory provides exemplary reports;
examples available for you to urge your lab to copy (see COC forms in zipped folder)
◦ Also ask for quarterly QC reports◦ TAMS gravimetric services:
http://www4.nau.edu/tams/services/filterlab.asp Flow rate standards must be verified annually,
some guidance in Redbook http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qapollutant.html
Data management (filters require chain of custody; see example COC forms for PEP program in session 7 folder)
General PM QC issues:
20
![Page 21: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
You may be using a non-FRM/FEM, so you can report to AQS using the non-regulatory guidance: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/memos/Non%20Regulatory%20Monitor%20Type%20Guidance.pdf
Flow rate and pressure calcs are made easier with free program: http://www.unitconverterpro.com/
REPORT NEGATIVE VALUES: see your MDL in the table AQS_SplgMethodsFromToolbox.xls in session 7 folder:◦ TEOMs MDL ranges from -10 to -50◦ BAMS MDL ranges from -10 to 4 mg/m3
More PM issues:
21
![Page 22: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
QC forms specific to your instrument are available in EPA draft SOPs in
course downloads folder:
22
![Page 23: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Use resources available:
23
![Page 24: PM Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070500/568168ad550346895ddf5ca7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
It ALL hangs on flow rate PM2.5 PEP auditing necessary for NAAQS
data Your instrument may be able to do “better”
than validation criteria, see your spec sheets
24
PM Monitoring Conclusions: