pne as mass tracers dark-to-luminous properties of early-type galaxies nicola r. napolitano kapteyn...
TRANSCRIPT
PNe as mass tracersDark-to-luminous properties of early-type
galaxies
Nicola R. Napolitano Kapteyn Institute Groningen (NL)
ESO workshop: PNe beyond the Milky Way. Garching 19-21 May 2004
Collaborators N. Douglas Kapteyn InstitutePN.S Consortium K. Kuijken Un. Leiden
M. Arnaboldi INAF-OATM. Capaccioli INAF-OACA. Romanowsky Un. NottinghamM. Merrifield Un. NottinghamH. Merrett Un. NottinghamK. Freeman Mt. StromloO. Gerhard Un. Basel
PNe as mass tracersDark-to-luminous properties of early-type
galaxies
ESO workshop: PNe beyond the Milky Way. Garching 19-21 May 2004
Observed trends of the M/L in early type galaxies
Inner stellar kinematics(long-slit spectroscopy)
PNe kinematics
When we measure =M/L ratios in galaxies we basicly deal withdark-to-luminous mass distribution
B Mlum MDM
LB Mlum MDM
Mlum
assuming a radially constant stellar mass-to-light radius, * (from
stellar population synthesis models)
At every radius, R, (in B band for example):
BR
1 MDMRMlumRdark-to-luminous
mass fraction
In presence of a significant(?) dark halo, this quantity must grow with
the distance from the center: OK!
HOW MUCH in order to be consistent with CDM(=NFW+cvir)?
Can we predict the radial run of the M/L in galaxies?
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
NFW 97MDM=MDM(Mvir, cvir)
Hernquist (1990)Mlum=Mlum(Ml,tot,,Re)
MDM=MDM(Mvir) Mlum=Mlum(Ml,tot)
Stellar syntesis mod
Shen et al. (2003)Shen et al. (2003)
cvir20Mvir1011Msun
0.13Bullock et al. (2001)Bullock et al. (2001)
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
fb1
Mtot
Mb Mb MDM
Mb1
SFMvirMl,tot
fvir MvirMl,tot
1
SF1fb
1Ml,tot SFMb
Formation efficiencyFormation efficiency
Baryon fraction (CMB)Baryon fraction (CMB)Bennett et al. 2003Bennett et al. 2003
Re4.5Ml,tot1011Msun
0.56 kpc
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.1x1011Msol
sf=0.1 (Padmanabhan et al. 04)sf=0.2 (Fukugita et al. 98)sf=0.6 (Guzik&Seljak 02 Marinoni&Hudson 02)
M/Ls increase more quickly for decreasing efficiencies and ...
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.1x1011Msol
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.4x1011Msol
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 5x1011Msol
MA
SS
…and M/Ls increase more quickly for increasing masses Are these trends observed in early-type galaxies?
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 5x1011Msol
MA
SSNGC 1399
BR
out in
Rout Rin
M/L gradients
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Log Ml,tot
sf=0.6
sf=0.2
sf=0.1
sf
M/L
gra
die
nts
sf=0.6
sf=0.2
sf=0.1
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Log Ml,tot
Plateau
Spread distribution
Gerhard et al. 01 Magorrian&Ballantyne01
sf=0.6
sf=0.2
sf=0.1
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Log Ml,tot
Napolitano et al. 2002
Equilibrium?
Log Ml,tot
Inconsistent withsf < 0.6 at 95% s.l.
Low concentrationsc=5±2
Log Ml,tot
Baryon physics in galaxy luminous regions not accounted in simulation [adiabatic collapse (de Jong et al. 2003, Dutton et al. 2003)?];
hydrodynamical simulations (Meza et al. 2003, Wright et al. 2004) found DM not to be dominant up to 5Re in low-luminosity compact galaxies
Halo stripping?
ConclusionsWe have a “toy-model” to make predictions of the M/L trend in the CDM framework, to be compared with future PNe observations AND other dynamical tracers (GCs, Xrays, lensing). Thanks to the PN.S statistical samples of PN radial velocities are reaching the precision which will allow to discriminate the efficiency of the baryon cooling in galaxies.
We have shown on a sample of 21 galaxies that the M/L gradients by PN and stellar kinematics are generally in agreement with the CDM expectations with some “critical points”:
a) nearly L* galaxies are in conflict with “reasonable” formation efficiency unless we do not assume low-concentration halos (at odd with collisionless CDM simulations, but qualitatively expected in adiabatic collapse picture);
b) low-luminosity/gradients galaxies are tendentially more consistent with very high formation efficiency (sf0.6) while high-luminosity/gradients galaxies are spread on all the range of allowed efficiencies (sf=0.1-0.6). The turn-off point is around Ml,tot =1.2x1011 Msun, i.e. around L* luminosities (MB ~ -20.2).
More (accurate) M/L estimates are needed in order to confirm these results….
FUTURE...
…The PN Spectrograph
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.4x1011Msol
Precisions of 20% at 5-6 Re in order to discriminate modelsSuch a precisions are expected to be reached with the PN.S
Dichotomy of ETs in DM properties as well as in luminous properties?
faint bright
boxy disky core power-law
Such a dichotomy is observed in X-ray properties(Pellegrini 1999)
Turn-off pointMB ~ -20.5L* galaxies
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.1x1011MsolNGC 3379
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.4x1011Msol
NGC 5128
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 5x1011Msol
MA
SSNGC 1399
…and M/Ls increase more quickly for increasing masses Are these trends observed in early-type galaxies?
sf=0.6
sf=0.2
sf=0.1
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Log Ml,tot
Plateau
Spread distribution
gra
die
nts
Observed trends of the M/L in early type galaxies
M/L “gradients” for systems with PNe
kinematics
gra
die
nts
Observed trends of the M/L in early type galaxies
M/L “gradients”from PNe kinematics+
systems with extended long-slit
spectroscopy (out to 2 Re)
PNe have been extensively used in the recent past to constrain the mass distribution in early-type galaxies up to
unprecedented distances from the galaxy center
Early works were based on poor statistical sample (the reliability of which has been discussed in Napolitano et al. 2001)
year GALAXY n.PNe Rout/Re M/LM/L*
1986 M32 15 6 6 31993 N3379 29 3.5(6) 7 71994 N1399 37 5 21-45 91995 N5128 433 5 10 41995 N3384 68 7 9 -1996 N4406 19 3 13 -1998 N1316 43 2.5 8 42001 N4472 24 5 21 8Recently the improved observation techniques are allowing much larger samples
2001 N4697 535 3 11 92003 N821 100 ->150 5 15 82003 N4494 100 ->250 5 6 -2003 N3379 110 ->300 5 7 72004 N5128 780 15 14 4
Observed trends of the M/L in early type galaxies
Inner stellar kinematics(long-slit spectroscopy)
PNe kinematics
B /
*
Observed trends of the M/L in early type galaxies
Inner stellar kinematics(long-slit spectroscopy)
PNe kinematics
Observed trends of the M/L in early type galaxies
Sample of 21 ETGs
In order to improve statisticswe have added a sample of ETGs with extended long-slit
spectroscopy data
B /
*
B/
* B
/*
/ *
Observed trends of the M/L in early type galaxies
Sample of 21 ETGs
In order to improve statisticswe have added a sample of ETGs with extended long-slit
spectroscopy data
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.1x1011Msol
NGC 3379
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.4x1011Msol
NGC 5128
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 5x1011Msol
MA
SSNGC 3379
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.1x1011Msol
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 1.4x1011Msol
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
Ml,tot = 5x1011Msol
MA
SS
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
NGC 5128
Ml,tot = 1.4x1011Msol
* = 3.5
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
NGC 1399
Ml,tot = 5x1011Msol
* = 9
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
NGC 3379
Ml,tot = 1.5x1011Msol
* = 7
Stellar population versus dynamical M/L
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Napolitano et al. 2002
Equilibrium?
Low concentrationc=5±2
2
sf=0.1sf=0.2sf=0.6
NFWrsrrs1 rrs2
Mvir
4 Acvir1r1 r2
Acvir ln1 cvir cvir1 cvir
lumrM
2
0.55 Re
rr 0.55 Re3 Re4.5 M0.56
cvir20Mvir1011Msun
0.13
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Star mass following an Hernquist (1990) profile
NFW dark halos with concentrations by Bullock et al. (2001)
Luminous mass and dark mass are 1-parameter family models
MDM/Mlum is a 2-parameter quantity: total stellar mass, M* , and virial mass, Mvir (or concentration cvir).
NFWrsrrs1 rrs2
Mvir
4 Acvir1r1 r2
Acvir ln1 cvir cvir1 cvir
lumrM
2
0.55 Re
rr 0.55 Re3Re4.5 M
0.56
cvir20Mvir1011Msun
0.13
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
Luminous mass and dark mass are 1-parameter family models
MDM/Mlum is a 2-parameter quantity: total stellar mass, M* , and virial
mass, Mvir (or concentration cvir).
R, B
R
1RMDM
Mlumout
MDMMlumin
Hernquist (1990)
NFW97 profileShen et al. (2003)
Bullock et al. (2001)
Total stellar mass virial mass
M SFMbar
fbar1
Mtot
Mbar Mbar MDM
Mbar1
SFMvirM
fvir MvirM
1
SF1fbar
1
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
M* and Mvir are related to the efficiency which the baryons cool in stars with,assuming that the original baryon fraction is the same for all the dark halosand close to the cosmic value from CBM measurements (Bennett et al. 2003)
where
Star formation efficiency
R, B
R
1RMDM
Mlumout
MDMMlumin
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
NGC 5128
Ml,tot = 1.4x1011Msol
* = 3.5
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
NGC 1399
Ml,tot = 5x1011Msol
* = 9
Predicted M/Ls in CDM framework
BR
1 MDMRMlumR
NGC 3379
Ml,tot = 1.5x1011Msol
* = 7