pol comm 8 tabloid politics
DESCRIPTION
The focus is on dumbing down here and debating whether the tabloidisation or celebrification of politics is negative making it seem trivial or, as Michael Temple argues, a positive force for engagement. Eighth lecture for final year students on the Political Communication option in Bournemouth UniversityTRANSCRIPT
The tabloidisation of politicsLecture 8
The Vicious Circle
Politicians Spin
Public Cynical
JournalistsSpin
33
Media Consumption: Influencers vs. General Population
Influencers are voracious consumers of media
They put more emphasis on person-to-person channels
They are big fans of national newspapers and talk radio
Media Usage: Gen. Pop vs Influencers
4%
8%
13%
14%
17%
23%
30%
31%
35%
53%
53%
63%
64%
68%
12%
18%
13%
23%
32%
26%
48%
51%
51%
63%
67%
70%
78%
73%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business magazine
News magazine
Celebrity endorsement
Trade magazine or newsletter
Product review in consumer magazines
Consumer magazines
Talk radio
Advice from co- workers
Cable/satellite network news
Advice from family/ friends
National newspapers
Regional television news
Major network television news
Local newspaper
I nfluencers
Gen Pop
44
Influencers are using new media channels and devices at twice the rate of GP
They have embraced new mediums such as podcasts and videocasts
They are much more interested in blogs than GP
PR Implication: Rethink the methods used to reach them
Media Usage: Gen. Pop vs Influencers
3%
3%
5%
7%
8%
9%
9%
11%
13%
16%
10%
12%
8%
19%
19%
23%
19%
23%
0% 20% 40%
Blogs written by MPs
Virtual communities
Company sponsoredblast email
Mobile media
Podcasts
Videocast/webcast
J ournalist blogs
RSS news feed
Non- journalist blogs
I nfluencers
Gen Pop
Media Consumption: Influencers vs. General Population
55
First Choice for News and Information Sources: Influencers vs. GP
Just like consumers state-side, most in the U.K. turn first to television and the Internet to get information, but Influencers elaborate on TV news!
Sources the U.K. Turns to First
1%
1%
2%
6%
11%
36%
44%
0%
0%
2%
11%
10%
42%
36%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Other
Mobile media
Friends/ family
Radio
Newspapers
Internet
Television
I nfluencers
Gen Pop
But: what the people watch
The impact upon politics News competes with other genres News focuses on key frames
Conflict Personal lives Mistakes
Journalists are adversarial Rise of the Rottweiler (Barnett)
Political Information is marginalised Politics is dramatised / but drama can be politicised
Relocating Politics Politics moves into other genres
Real-life TV The bear-pit Comedy Drama
But what images are constructed for us?
Cultivation theory (Gerbner & Gross, 1976)
Blockbuster Democracy Joe Mathews ‘The People's Machine’ 2006 Political attitudes & perceptions shaped more
by movies, pop culture than politics Result is a merger in style of communication /
presentation The rise and success of the celebrity politician
Cultivation Theory Revisited What do we learn about politics?
And our perception of politicians?
Possible Effects Politics is viewed as part of popular culture Politicians are ‘emotionalised’ Politics/Politicians not taken seriously Politics is not seen as important Politicians are seen as idiotic
The dumbing down of politics Public are not informed properly Politicians talk in simple soundbites Debate is stifled Media malaise Cynicism in politics
But whose fault is it??
In defence of dumbing down Makes politics more accessible Makes politics interesting The disengaged are more aware of policy
making(see work of Michael Temple)
Thoughts Is there evidence all media dumb down? Is there evidence media compete with other
genres when presenting information? Is dumbing down good or bad? Based on your conclusion, how should
politicians promote themselves?