policy, planning & legislative servicespolicy, planning & legislative services presentation...
TRANSCRIPT
Policy, Planning & Legislative Services Presentation to the
43rd Annual MARO Spring Leadership ConferenceWednesday, June 7, 2017
Matt Lori, Senior Deputy Director
2
Mission The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
provides opportunities, services, and programs that promote a
healthy, safe, and stable environment for residents to be
self-sufficient.
Vision Develop and encourage
measurable health, safety and self-sufficiency outcomes that reduce and prevent risks, promote equity,
foster healthy habits, and transform the health and human services system to improve the
lives of Michigan families.
Our Guiding Principles
To ensure that MDHHS policy development, implementation, and legislative priorities are aligned
with the department’s strategic goals.
Mission
3
• Obtained a Health Professional Shortage Area designation from the federal government allowing us to expand the State Loan Repayment program in Flint to encourage more pediatric providers to practice in that area
• Nurse Professional Fund is providing nurses, nurse practitioners, and nursing students to provide clinical services and public education in Flint. This efforts targets:
o Latino Community
o Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Action on Flint Declaration of Emergency
4
Overview
• Policy
• Planning
• Michigan Rehabilitation Services
• Bureau of Community Services
• Legislative Affairs & Constituent Services
Policy, Planning & Legislative Services
5
Overview• State Innovation Model (SIM)• Health Information Technology• Health Disparities• Integrated Service Delivery• Other Policy Initiatives, including:
o Human Trafficking Health Advisory Boardo Prescription Drug and Opioid Abuse Task Force Implementation o Mental Health and Wellness Commission Implementationo People Group o NGA Super Utilizers Policy Academy Participant
Policy
6
Background
• $70 million Michigan State Innovation Model (SIM) began February 2015
• Develop and test state-led, multi-payer healthcare payment and service delivery models to improve health outcomes, increase quality of care, and reduce costs
• Rolling out multiple initiatives to support patient-centered healthcare that coordinates with community organizations to address social determinants of health
State Innovation Model
7
Patient Centered Medical Home Launched January 1, 2017, statewide
• Nearly 360 primary care practices• Over 2,100 primary care providers• Over 350,000 Medicaid beneficiaries• Sustain and expand foundation developed through the Michigan Primary Care
Transformation (MiPCT) demonstration• Enhancements:
o Transitions of careo Managing costo Creating clinical-community linkages to address social and other wellness
factors
State Innovation Model
8
Health Information Exchange Implement the Relationship and Attribution Management Platform (RAMP)
• Includes the following information sharing use cases:o Health provider directory (HPD), registering providers in the
information exchange networko Active care relationship service (ACRS), attributing patient records
with registered providerso Common key service (CKS), consolidating patient records under a
common patient identifiero Quality measure information (QMI), standardizing quality measures
and reporting process across payers• Forms information sharing and exchange foundation to build care
coordination and value-based payment efforts in the future
State Innovation Model
9
Community Health Innovation Regions
• Piloting development of local, multi-sector infrastructure to improve population health
o Governance to include healthcare payers and providers along with public health, mental health, and other community groups
o Consolidate disparate community needs assessment and improvement planning efforts into single effort
o Operationalize clinical-community linkage partnerships and processes to inform ongoing and upstream decision making to address social determinants of health and health inequities
• State Program Guidance released in November 2016
State Innovation Model
10
• Five regions developing and submitting local operational plans in April:
o Muskegon
o Jackson
o Washtenaw/Livingston
o Genesee
o Northwest Lower Michigan
State Innovation Model
11
Health Information Technology• Support the Health Information Technology Commission created by PA 137-06
• Coordinate MDHHS activities with the State Designated Entity for Health Information Exchange and the Trusted Data Sharing Organizations in Michigan
• Offer recommendations on strategic alignment and direction on policy issues related to health IT and secure date exchange
• Coordinate and align health IT and data sharing efforts with statewide transformation initiatives
• Align federal health IT priorities with MDHHS health IT policy to ensure the right data for the right person is at the right point of care
12
• Established in 1988 to provide a persistent and continuing focus on eliminating health disparities among Michigan’s populations of color
• Designated MDHHS lead for PA 653 related activities, including the annual legislative report
• Initiates programs and policies to eliminate health disparities. Priority strategies include:
o Improve race/ethnicity data collection and data systems
o Strengthen government capacity to develop effective programs and partnerships
o Improve social determinants through public education and evidence-based interventions
o Ensure equitable access to quality healthcare
o Strengthen community engagement, capacity, and empowerment
Health Disparities Reduction and Minority Health Section
13
Brief Overview
• Integrated Service Delivery (ISD) is an enterprise strategy to bring together a diverse set of benefits and services in a holistic, customer-focused experience aimed at impacting health, safety and self-sufficiency outcomes
Integrated Service Delivery
14
ISD Strategy Includes Multiple Key Components
• Integrated Service Delivery Portal-Online needs assessment, connection to services, and development of goals to improve stability
• Universal Caseload Management-Assigns tasks to groups of staff members working on a specific part of the casework process, allowing casework to be shared across teams and offices and improving efficiency
• Contact Center-A streamlined customer contact point which better manages incoming phone calls and other contact types, offers self-service options over the phone and routes customer contacts
• Supporting Services- System and information integration strategies including both technological infrastructure and data sharing arrangements which support ISD
Integrated Service Delivery
15
MDHHS Activities to Date
• Developed a business process and technology roadmap to accomplish budgeting, procurement and high level requirements design
• Chartered the three key components of ISD being developed in FY17 and completed detailed discovery and business requirements processes for each component
• Currently designing and developing the technological systems, business processes, program policies and readiness supports needed to move forward with practical tests (i.e. pilots) of new ISD components in late 2017
• Preparing to pilot the ISD Portal with customers and community partners in one county beginning in September 2017
• Preparing to pilot the combined universal caseload and contact center components in two counties in January 2018
Integrated Service Delivery
16
Prescription Drug and Opioid Abuse Task Force Implementation
• 12 recommendations of the Prescription Drug and Opioid Abuse Task Force are the responsibility of MDHHS
• All 12 recommendations are either complete, in progress, or ongoing
• These recommendations include:
o Working to reduce doctor and pharmacy shopping
o Increase access to care
o Increase access to Naloxone
17
Prescription Drug and Opioid Abuse Task Force Implementation
• Coordination point on prescription drug and opioid abuse efforts for:
o All MDHHS administrations
o Other state agencies
o External stakeholders
• Efforts include:
o Program improvements
o Grant activities
o Public awareness campaign
18
Prescription Drug and Opioid Abuse Task Force Implementation
• Federal 21st Century CURES act will provide $16.37 to Michigan to enhance our opioid abuse efforts
• Treatment funding will be used to:
o Increased funding, promotion, training, and support for Medication Assisted Treatment
o Increased use of peer supports
• Prevention funding will be used to:
o Increase community prevention strategies
o Increase access to Naloxone 19
Section 298 Initiative
20
Boilerplate Language in Fiscal Year 2017 Appropriations Act
“The department shall work with a workgroup to make recommendations regarding the most effective financing model and policies for behavioral health services to improve the coordination of behavioral and physical health services for individuals with mental illnesses, intellectual and developmental disabilities and substance use disorders.”
Section 298 Initiative
21
Time Period Event or Activity
February 2016 Executive Budget Proposal
March 2016 – June 2016 Lieutenant Governor’s Workgroup
July 2016 Creation of 298 Facilitation Workgroup
September 2016 – November 2016 Affinity Group Process
November 2016 – December 2016 Development of Policy Recommendations
January 2017 Submission of Interim Report
January 2017 – February 2017 Financing Model Proposal Process
February 2017 – March 2017 Development of Financing Model Recommendations
March 2017 Submission of Final Report
March 2017 – Present Legislative Discussion of Report
Section 298 Initiative
22
Components of the Final Report• 70 Policy Recommendations• 6 Financing Model Recommendations• Benchmarks for Implementation (a.k.a. Performance Metrics)• Transition Plan (a.k.a. High‐Level Process Map)
Section 298 Initiative
23
Themes from the Section 298 Final Report• Improve the coordination of physical health and behavioral health services• Increase the availability of resources at the service delivery level• Achieve greater uniformity in access to services on a statewide basis• Strengthen the consistency of policies and procedures across the system• Encourage innovation and collaboration in service delivery at the local
level• Ensure transparency and accountability to local communities and the
greater public
Section 298 Initiative
24
Ongoing Process• The legislature is considering different financing models as part of the
appropriations process.• House Proposal• Senate Proposal• Conference Committee
• The Department is also reviewing and evaluating the 70 policy recommendations to identify potential next steps for policy changes.
Overview
• Healthcare Workforce
• Certificate of Need
• Pathways to Potential
• Central Grants Management
Planning & Program Development
25
• Increasing the Healthcare Workforce
o Provides state loan repayment for primary care providers located in underserved areas of Michigan
o Supports the recruitment and retention of international medical graduates
• Ensuring Access to Services Meets Demand
o Supports the development of community health centers
o Provides federal funds to Michigan’s free clinics
• Creating Health Planning Tools
o Designation and re-designation of healthcare shortage areas
o Identifies characteristics of the uninsured in Michigan
o Disseminates the annual County Health Rankings
Healthcare Workforce
26
Health Professionals currently receiving federal or state loan repayment or other benefits for serving in health professional shortage areas as supported by MDHHS
International medical graduates able to serve MI citizens through the J1 Visa waiver as recommended by MDHHS
Federally Qualified Health Centers and Community Health Centers, rural health clinics, school based clinics new or expanded this year with support from MDHHS
Free clinics, providing care to residents that have no means to pay, that receive support from MDHHS
609
86
18
42
Healthcare Workforce
27
Healthcare WorkforceFocus: State Loan Repayment Program (SLRP)
28
Incentivizes Recruitment & Retention of Primary Care Providers in Underserved Areas
• Repays up to $200,000 in medical education debt for eight years of service
• In 2016, SLRP targeted strengthening the primary care workforce in Genesee County by awarding loan repayment to 11 primary care providers in Flint, MI
• In 2017, SLRP will continue to focus on retaining Genesee County providers, and will focus on recruiting Inpatient Child/Adolescent Psychiatrists, which are in a critically short supply in Michigan
Healthcare WorkforceFocus: State Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) placements FY13-17
29
65 MSLRP Provider awarded in 2017188 MSLRP Provider awarded 2013‐16
Certificate of Need
30
Promotes the availability and accessibility of quality health care services
• The Certificate of Need Commission establishes standards for 15 types of health care services and equipment including hospital beds & nursing home beds
• Certificate of Need approval is needed to initiate, replace or relocate any of the covered services or equipment
• Strives to balance cost, quality and access of Michigan’s healthcare services
Michigan Certificate of NeedQuick Statistics FY16
Letters of Intent received
Applications filed
Projects approved
Facilities surveyed and data collected to gauge compliance
442
320
303
1,137
31
Pathways to Potential
32
• Pathways to Potential targets five outcome areas: attendance, education, health, safety and self-sufficiency
• Provides centrally located services with a network of supports and community coordinated services to create a positive impact on students and families
• Success Coaches placed in a school to meet with students and families to identify and remover barriers and to connect to a network of available services
• Pathways to Potential started in 2012 with 124 schools participating. Currently, Pathways to Potential has expanded to 259 schools in 34 counties
• At the end of the 2014-2015 school year, there was a reduction in chronic absenteeism of 37.23% in the 219 Pathways schools
Pathways to Potential
33
Pathways to Potential Success Coaches are Serving Families
in 259 School Statewide
Pathways to PotentialQuick Statistics FY16
Interactions Pathways to Potential Success Coaches had with or on behalf of students in Michigan
Barriers to academic success identified by Pathways to Potential Success Coaches
Referrals, resources or follow‐up initiated by Pathways to Potential Success Coaches
Interactions where the primary purpose was to address attendance issues
73,930
168,780
86,952
26,228
34
Pathways to Potential
35
Strategic Goals for 2017
• Maintain a continuous decrease in chronic absenteeism by 10% since the school begins participation
• Measure and monitor the overall success of program through student engagement
• Expand to more rural areas
• Partner with districts and the Michigan Department of Education to create and collect more meaningful metrics
• Increase connections with community partners to provide services and donations
Central Grants Management
36
Goal: Ensure all grant funds are coordinated to meet the Department’s mission.
• Builds upon a process improvement initiative
• Streamlines Department approvals and internal communication
• Assists programs in finding new funding sources
• Acts as a liaison between all areas of the Department to link similar programs together
Michigan Rehabilitation ServicesOverview
• Michigan Rehabilitation Services partners with individuals and employers to achieve employment outcomes and independence for individuals with disabilities
• Serves applicants seeking employment by providing individual counseling based on individual experience, abilities, functional limitation, and the essential functions of a specific job
• Services business customers in providing expertise and resources to help locate, match, and accommodate employees with disabilities
37
MRS performance data FY15Performance Measures Federal Standards MRS Performance
Number Employment Outcomes
Michigan Benchmark = 6,695
6,821
Percent Employed >55.8% 59.6%
Employed Competitively >72.6% 94.8%
Significantly Disabled >62.4% 81.2%
Earnings Ratio >0.52 0.6
Self‐Support >53.0% 70.4%
Minority Ratio >0.80 0.84
38
Michigan Rehabilitation Services
Bureau of Community Services
Overview
• Housing and Homeless Services
• Crime Victims Services Programs
• Michigan Domestic and Sexual Violence Prevention and Treatment Board
• Community Action Agencies (CAAs)
39
Housing and Homeless ServicesFY16 Outcomes
40
Provided 827,056 bed nights of emergency shelter or motel
Assisted 35,463
people with housing assistance
Delivered permanent housing to 10,564 people
Crime Victim Compensation
Last resort for unpaid medical bills, loss of earnings, burial costs, counseling needs
The Sexual Assault Forensic Exam Program, also known as S.A.F.E. Response, allows sexual
assault victims to receive a forensic exam at no cost.
Crime Victim Assistance
Federal pass‐through dollars to local public and
non‐profit agencies engaging in direct services
to victims of crime through a competitive
grant process
Crime Victim Rights and Assessment
Revenue
Restricted funding to support Crime Victims Rights
ActivitiesFunds Prosecuting Attorneys
and Juvenile CourtsSupports mandatory
notification rights of crime victims including the
Michigan Crime Victims Notification Network
Provides advocate training to better assist victims
Crime Victims Services Programs
41
Contracts, Partnerships & Funding
$19.03 million funding for local domestic/sexual violence and child advocacy services awarded in almost 180 contracts
Manage funds from 17 different Federal/State funding sources
Statewide partnerships with the Attorney General, Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards, Prosecuting Attorney’s Association of Michigan and the Michigan Coalition to End Domestic/Sexual Violence
Client Services Provided in FY 2016
273,399 Emergency Shelter Nights
9,949 Adults/Children were provided Emergency Shelter
2,139 Adults/Children received SANE services
8,411 Children received forensic interviews
84,289 Domestic violence and 10,198 sexual assault crisis calls
23,614 Adults/Children were provided non‐residential counseling
Key Initiatives in 2016Michigan Sexual Assault Evidence Kit Tracking and Reporting Commission
MiTEAM DV/Enhancement Safe and Together Model Training
Staff support for:Campus Sexual Assault and Title IXDetroit Sexual Assault Kit SummitMultiple OVW TrainingsFirst Lady of Michigan’s Campus Sexual Assault Summit
Michigan Domestic and Sexual Violence Prevention and Treatment Board
42
Community Action Agencies (CAAs)
53,223children
56,727seniors
6,724deliverable fuel
assistance
1,573weatherized
units
2015
Com
mun
ity Services B
lock Grant Ann
ual R
eport, Wea
therization
Prog
ram Yea
r 15, and
Michigan En
ergy Assistan
ce Program
FY2
016
MDH
HS Burea
u of Com
mun
ity Action & Econo
mic Opp
ortunity
43
Summary of services and a sample of the populations served by Michigan CAAs included:
201,864 low‐income individuals
Human TraffickingHuman Trafficking Health Advisory Board
• Created in 2014
• Includes mental health professionals, child trauma specialists, ER nurses, physicians, hospitalists, and survivors
• Mission:
• Coordinate the sharing of information about health services available to survivors of trafficking in Michigan
• Partner with local health agencies to improve health services for survivors
• Improve the awareness, education, and training of health professionals about the issue of human trafficking
• Make recommendations to the legislature to improve state laws and rules related to health services for survivors
44
Human TraffickingOther Related Projects
• 2016 Statewide Public Awareness Campaign
• Targeted ads and materials in airports, buses, malls, and doctors offices across the state
• Human Trafficking Emergency Room Protocol Pilot
• Grant with Genesys Health in Genesee Co. to develop and implement an emergency room protocol for identifying, treating, and connecting victims of trafficking with community resources
• Four health systems are participating in the pilot (Genesys, Hurley, St. Mary’s Standish, & St. Joseph)
45
The picture can't be displayed.
46
25 Most Common Diagnoses for ED Visits for High Utilizers (All Diagnoses)April 2014 – March 2015 Uses All Header‐Level Diagnosis Codes V‐Codes Not Included Number of Visits Diagnosis Code Long Description 162,595 3051 Tobacco use disorder 122,855 4019 Unspecified essential hypertension 60,737 25000 Diabetes mellitus w/out mention of complication, type II or unspecified, not stated as uncontrolled 55,786 30000 Anxiety state, unspecified 53,333 49390 Asthma, unspecified type, unspecified 49,486 78900 Abdominal pain, unspecified site 49,090 33829 Other chronic pain 47,558 53081 Esophageal reflux 46,967 311 Depressive disorder, not elsewhere classified 41,545 7840 Headache 40,380 78650 Chest pain, unspecified 37,240 7862 Cough 35,930 7245 Backache, unspecified 35,612 78701 Nausea with vomiting 32,394 78909 Abdominal pain, other specified site 30,030 7295 Pain in limb 29,692 2724 Other and unspecified hyperlipidemia 27,181 29680 Bipolar disorder, unspecified 26,797 7242 Lumbago 26,189 5990 Urinary tract infection, site not specified 26,009 496 Chronic airway obstruction, not elsewhere classified 23,698 78605 Shortness of breath 23,145 4280 Congestive heart failure, unspecified 22,258 33819 Other acute pain 20,557 34590 Epilepsy, unspecified, without mention of intractable epilepsy 47
High and Super High Utilizers
Number of ED Visits % of High Utilizers
5 ‐ 9 80.08%
10 ‐ 14 11.97% Total High Utilizers 67,634
15 ‐ 19 3.85% Total Super High Utilizers 2,770
20 ‐ 39 3.30%
40 ‐ 99 0.73%
100+ 0.07%
Number of ED Visits by High Utilizers
100+ 0.07%
40 ‐ 99 0.73%
20 ‐ 39 3.30%
15 ‐ 19 3.85%
10 ‐ 14 11.94%
5 ‐ 9 80.08%
*High Utilizer definition: 5 or more ED visits and 6 or more months of continuous Medicaid coverage between April 2014 and March 2015
*Super High Utilizer definition: Same criteria as High Utilizer, but with 20 or more ED visits
48
High and Super High Utilizers
High Utilizer Super High Utilizer
Has MH Diagnosis 70.09% 96.39%
No MH Diagnosis 29.91% 3.61%
Percentage With at Least One Mental Health
Diagnosis on an ED Claim or Encounter, by Utilization
Category
High Utilizer Super High Utilizer
70.09% 96.39%
Note: Includes those that had at least one claim of encounter with some diagnosis involving mental health 49
Super High Utilizers and High UtilizersSuper High Utilizers High Utilizers Overall
In Managed Care 75.13% 75.32% 75.17%In Healthy Michigan Plan 24.37% 20.84% 27.64%PIHP Contact 49.86% 29.56% 8.65%In MIChoice During Year 1.16% 1.52% 0.52%Were Pregnant During Year 3.39% 7.43% 2.81%In NF During Year 3.75% 3.23% 1.69%
Other Characteristics Among Categories
80.00%70.00%60.00%50.00%40.00%30.00%20.00%10.00%0.00%
In Managed Care In Health
Michigan Plan
PIHP Contact
In MIChoice During Year
Were Pregnant During Year
In NF During Year
Super High Utilizers High Utilizers Overall50
Policy, Planning and Legislative Services Senior Deputy Director: Matt LoriPhone: (517) 241-4040Website: http://www.michigan.gov/mdhhsLegislative Service Bureau: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(n4rbq4jwj2dfwz1qybtu01cu))/mileg.aspx?page=home
MDHHS Contact Info and Useful Links